Field
The technology described herein relates to micromachined ultrasonic transducers (CMUTs) and related apparatus and methods.
Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers (CMUTs) are known devices that include a membrane above a micromachined cavity. The membrane may be used to transduce an acoustic signal into an electric signal, or vice versa. Thus, CMUTs can operate as ultrasonic transducers.
According to an aspect of the application, an ultrasound device is provided, comprising a substrate, a plurality of ultrasonic transducers integrated with the substrate and including a first group of ultrasonic transducers and a second group of ultrasonic transducers, and a plurality of individually electrically controllable bias electrodes including a first bias electrode corresponding to the first group of ultrasonic transducers and a second bias electrode corresponding to the second group of ultrasonic transducers.
According to an aspect of the application, a method of operating an ultrasound device having a substrate and a plurality of ultrasonic transducers integrated with the substrate is provided. The method comprises electrically biasing at a first bias voltage a first bias electrode corresponding to a first group of ultrasonic transducers of the plurality of ultrasonic transducers, and simultaneously with biasing the first bias electrode, electrically biasing at a second bias voltage different than the first bias voltage a second bias electrode corresponding to a second group of ultrasonic transducers of the plurality of ultrasonic transducers.
Various aspects and embodiments of the application will be described with reference to the following figures. It should be appreciated that the figures are not necessarily drawn to scale. Items appearing in multiple figures are indicated by the same reference number in all the figures in which they appear.
According to an aspect of the present application, a segmented biasing scheme is implemented for biasing groups of ultrasonic transducers of an ultrasound device. The ultrasound device may be an ultrasound probe, and may include a plurality of ultrasonic transducers configured to produce and/or detect ultrasound signals. The ultrasonic transducers may be CMUTs. Proper operation of the CMUTs may involve electrically biasing the CMUTs, for example by biasing their membranes. Rather than providing a single bias signal to all the CMUTs, via a common electrode, two or more distinct biasing segments may be created. Thus, different groups of the CMUTs may receive different bias signals, allowing for improved operation.
The aspects and embodiments described above, as well as additional aspects and embodiments, are described further below. These aspects and/or embodiments may be used individually, all together, or in any combination of two or more, as the application is not limited in this respect.
The CMUT 106 may optionally include additional layers, such as isolation layers, oxides (e.g., silicon oxide), or other layers. These are not illustrated for simplicity, and because the various aspects described herein are not limited to use with any particular type of CMUT.
The membrane 204, which may be made of silicon or other suitable material, may be made to vibrate either by applying a voltage to it, such as an alternative current (AC) voltage, or in response to receiving an ultrasound signal. It may be desirable to apply a direct current (DC) bias signal to the membrane. Such a bias signal can cause so-called “spring softening,” or more generally may be used to tune the membrane's ability to vibrate. Thus, application of a suitable bias signal can alter the sensitivity of the CMUT for both transmit and receive mode operation. As shown in
In
While
The larger the dimensions H and W, the more beneficial the ability to independently bias different group of CMUTs of an ultrasound device may be. The manufacturing processes used to make CMUTs may result in variations between CMUTs of an ultrasound device. For example, manufacturing many CMUTs on a wafer will typically involve the use of processes such as deposition, lithography, and etching, which may not be applied uniformly across the wafer. Referring to
Referring again to
In some embodiments, the difference in bias voltages applied to the different bias regions 104a-104h may be between 3% and 30%, between 5% and 20%, or any value or range of values within such ranges. For example, a bias voltage of approximately 60 volts may be applied to bias region 104a and a bias voltage of approximately 80 volts may be applied to bias region 104d. These, however, are non-limiting examples. In some embodiments, two or more of the bias regions 104a-104h may receive the same bias value. In some embodiments, all the bias regions 104a-104h may receive different bias values. The bias value applied to a given bias region may depend on the intended application of the device and the determined behavior of CMUTs within that bias region.
Accordingly, an aspect of the present application provides circuitry and methods for determining a bias value to apply to a bias region of an ultrasound device. Referring to
While
The described operation of detecting CMUT behavior and adjusting an applied bias signal may be performed at limited times in some embodiments. For example, determination of the appropriate bias voltage may be determined once, after manufacture, according to one embodiment. In this sense, the determination of the appropriate bias voltage may be considered a calibration step in manufacturing. In some embodiments, the determination may be performed periodically to account for device aging, for example after a set number of uses of the ultrasound device 500. In some embodiments, the determination may be performed dynamically during operation of the ultrasound device 500.
While
Also, while
It should be appreciated from the foregoing that an aspect of the present application provides a method for biasing CMUTs of an ultrasound device. The method may include electrically biasing at a first bias voltage a first bias electrode corresponding to a first group of ultrasonic transducers and, simultaneously with biasing the first bias electrode, electrically biasing at a second bias voltage different than the first bias voltage a second bias electrode corresponding to a second group of ultrasonic transducers. Electrically biasing the first bias electrode may involve electrically biasing a common membrane of a plurality of CMUTs.
Optionally, in response to electrically biasing the first bias electrode, an electrical response of the first group of ultrasonic transducers may be detected and the bias signal may be altered. The first bias voltage may be up to approximately 30% greater than the second bias voltage, or may differ from the second bias voltage by any of the percentages previously listed herein.
Having thus described several aspects and embodiments of the technology of this application, it is to be appreciated that various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those of ordinary skill in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the technology described in the application. It is, therefore, to be understood that the foregoing embodiments are presented by way of example only and that, within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereto, inventive embodiments may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. In addition, any combination of two or more features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods described herein, if such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods are not mutually inconsistent, is included within the scope of the present disclosure.
As a non-limiting example, various embodiments have been described as including CMUTs. In alternative embodiments, piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducers (PMUTs) may be used instead of, or in addition to, CMUTs.
Also, as described, some aspects may be embodied as one or more methods. The acts performed as part of the method may be ordered in any suitable way. Accordingly, embodiments may be constructed in which acts are performed in an order different than illustrated, which may include performing some acts simultaneously, even though shown as sequential acts in illustrative embodiments.
All definitions, as defined and used herein, should be understood to control over dictionary definitions, definitions in documents incorporated by reference, and/or ordinary meanings of the defined terms.
The indefinite articles “a” and “an,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, unless clearly indicated to the contrary, should be understood to mean “at least one.”
The phrase “and/or,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, should be understood to mean “either or both” of the elements so conjoined, i.e., elements that are conjunctively present in some cases and disjunctively present in other cases.
As used herein in the specification and in the claims, the phrase “at least one,” in reference to a list of one or more elements, should be understood to mean at least one element selected from any one or more of the elements in the list of elements, but not necessarily including at least one of each and every element specifically listed within the list of elements and not excluding any combinations of elements in the list of elements. This definition also allows that elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified within the list of elements to which the phrase “at least one” refers, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified.
In the claims, as well as in the specification above, all transitional phrases such as “comprising,” “including,” “carrying,” “having,” “containing,” “involving,” “holding,” “composed of,” and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. Only the transitional phrases “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of” shall be closed or semi-closed transitional phrases, respectively.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5286671 | Kurtz et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 6328696 | Fraser | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6381197 | Savord | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6430109 | Khuri-Yakub et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6443901 | Fraser | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6645145 | Dreschel et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6659954 | Robinson | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6694817 | Degertekin et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6779387 | Degertekin | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6795374 | Barnes et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6831394 | Baumgartner et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6865140 | Thomenius et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6958255 | Khuri-Yakub et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 7030536 | Smith et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7037746 | Smith et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7052464 | Wodnicki | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7104129 | Nasiri et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7125383 | Hoctor et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7247246 | Nasiri et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7250353 | Nasiri et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7257051 | Thomenius et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7285897 | Fisher et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7312440 | Degertekin et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7313053 | Wodnicki | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7375420 | Fisher et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7441321 | Baumgartner et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7441447 | Degertekin et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7442570 | Nasiri et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7451651 | Woychik et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7518251 | Fisher et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7530952 | Huang et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7545012 | Smith et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7557342 | Federov et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7564172 | Huang | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7612483 | Degertekin | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7612635 | Huang | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7615834 | Khuri-Yakub et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7622848 | Lee et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7637149 | Degertekin et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7646133 | Degertekin | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7687976 | Haider et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7745248 | Park et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7759839 | Huang | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7764003 | Huang | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7779696 | Huang | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7846102 | Kupnik et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7878977 | Mo et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7880565 | Huang | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7888709 | Lemmerhirt et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7892176 | Wodnicki et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7956510 | Huang | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8004373 | Huang | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8008105 | Huang | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8008835 | Degertekin | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8018301 | Huang | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8076821 | Degertekin | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8105941 | Huang | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8120229 | Huang | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8133182 | Wagner | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8203912 | Roest et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8222065 | Smeys et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8241931 | Antoine et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
| 8247945 | Huang | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8277380 | Daft et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8309428 | Lemmerhirt et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8315125 | Lemmerhirt et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8327521 | Dirksen et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8334133 | Federov et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8345508 | Wodnicki et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8345513 | Huang | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8363514 | Huang | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8372011 | Degertekin | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8398554 | Degertekin | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8399278 | Lemmerhirt et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8402831 | Kupnik et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8429808 | Huang | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8451693 | Nikoozadeh et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8483014 | Huang | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8526271 | Huang | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8559274 | Huang | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8563345 | Adler et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8647279 | Daft et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8658453 | Lemmerhirt et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8665672 | Soeda et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8852103 | Rothberg et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8957564 | Hiroe et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
| 9061318 | Rothberg et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9067779 | Rothberg et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
| 9242275 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 20040160144 | Daft et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20050121734 | Degertekin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177045 | Degertekin et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050203397 | Degertekin | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20070140515 | Oliver | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167811 | Lemmerhirt et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167812 | Lemmerhirt et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070180916 | Tian et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070215964 | Khuri-Yakub et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080194053 | Huang | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080290756 | Huang | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080296708 | Wodnicki et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080308920 | Wan | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090122651 | Kupnik et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090134497 | Barth et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090148967 | Wodnicki et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090176375 | Benson et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090250729 | Lemmerhirt et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100027830 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100063397 | Wagner | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100225200 | Kupnik et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110084570 | Soeda et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110115333 | Ezaki | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110140224 | Kropelnicki et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110272693 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120074509 | Berg et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120129301 | Or-Bach et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120187508 | Adler et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120193719 | Or-Bach et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120248554 | Klein et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20130096433 | Lemmerhirt et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130116561 | Rothberg et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130161702 | Chen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130169110 | Jeong et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20140057382 | Supino et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140117809 | Zemp | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140217478 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140219062 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140264660 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140288428 | Rothberg et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150016227 | Brock-Fisher | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150084053 | Rothberg et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150087991 | Chen | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150298170 | Rothberg et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160009544 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160296207 | Brock-Fisher | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310992 | Van Rens | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160363609 | Wygant | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170003384 | Christiansen | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2 467 776 | Aug 2010 | GB |
| 10-2013-0134724 | Dec 2013 | KR |
| WO 2009107940 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO 2012017978 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| WO 2014151525 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| [No Author Listed], Sil-Via, TSI & Advanced Features. Silex Microsystems. http://www.silexmicrosystems.com/mems-foundry/sil-via-tsi-advanced-features/ [last accessed Jan. 6, 2015]. 4 pages. |
| Calmes et al., Highly Integrated 2-D Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers. 1999 IEEE Ultrason Symp. 1999;1163-6. |
| Cha et al., Influences of perforation ratio in characteristics of capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers in air. Sensors Actuators A. 2011;171:191-8. |
| Cheng et al., An Efficient Electrical Addressing Method Using Through-Wafer Vias for Two-Dimensional Ultrasonic Arrays. 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. 2000;2:1179-82. |
| Cheng et al., Electrical Through-Wafer Interconnects with Sub-PicoFarad Parasitic Capacitance. 2001 Microelectromechan Syst Conf. Aug. 24, 2001;18-21. |
| Daft et al., Microfabricated ultrasonic transducers monolithically integrated with high voltage electronics. Proc Ultrason Symp. 2004;493-6. |
| Dixon-Warren, Overview of MEMS microphone technologies for consumer applications. MEMS J. Mar. 8, 2011. http://www.memsjournal.com/2011/03/overview-of-mems-microphone-technologies-for-consumer-applications.html [last accessed Feb. 19, 2014]. 10 pages. |
| Doody et al., Modeling and Characterization of CMOS-Fabricated Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasound Transducers. J Microelectromech Sys. Feb. 1, 2011;20(1):104-18. |
| Eccardt et al., Micromachined ultrasound transducers with improved coupling factors from a CMOS compatible process. Ultrasonics. Mar. 2000;38:774-80. |
| Eccardt et al., Surface micromachined ultrasound transducer in CMOS technology. Proc Ultrason Symp. 1996;959-62. |
| Gurun et al., Front-end CMOS electronics for monolithic integration with CMUT arrays: circuit design and initial experimental results. Proc Ultrason Symp. 2008;390-3. |
| Helin et al., Poly-SiGe-based CMUT array with high acoustical pressure. MEMS. 2012 IEEE 25th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems. Jan. 29, 2012;305-8. |
| Kim et al., Design and Test of a Fully Controllable 64×128 2-D CMUT Array Integrated with Reconfigurable Frontend ASICs for Volumetric Ultrasound Imaging. IEEE. International Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. Oct. 7-10, 2012;77-80. doi: 10.1109/ULTSYM.2012.0019. |
| Knight et al., Low Temperature Fabrication of Immersion Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers on Silicon and Dielectric Substrates. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Contr. Oct. 2004;51(10):1324-33. |
| Kupnik et al., CMUT Fabrication Based on a Thick Buried Oxide Layer. Proc IEEE Ultrason Symp. Oct. 2010;2010:547-550. doi:10.1109/ULTSYM.2010.5935935. Epub Jun. 8, 2012. 10 pages. |
| Kupnik et al., Wafer-Bonded CMUT Meets CMOS. 2010 CMOS Emerging Technology Workshop. May 21, 2010;1-22. |
| Lemmerhirt et al., A 32×32 capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer array manufactured in standard CMOS. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. Jul. 2012;59(7):1521-36. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2012.2352. |
| Lemmerhirt et al., An electronically-scanned CMUT-in-CMOS transducer for hemodialysis vascular access monitoring. Ultrason Symp. 2011 IEEE International Conference. Oct. 18, 2011;2193-6. |
| Lin et al., Packaging of Large and Low-Pitch Size 2D Ultrasonic Transducer Arrays. MEMS Conf. 2010;508-11. |
| Lu et al., Investigation of thermal stress influence on CMUT in standard CMOS process. Info Auto. 2009 ICIA International Conference. Jun. 22, 2009;1447-51. |
| Manzanares et al., Air-coupled MUMPs capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers with resonant cavities. Ultrason. 2012;52:482-9. |
| Nikoozadeh et al., Forward-Looking Intracardiac Ultrasound Imaging Using a 1-D CMUT Array Integrated With Custom Front-End Electronics. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Contr. Dec. 2008;55(12):2651-60. |
| Noble et al., A cost-effective and manufacturable route to the fabrication of high-density 2D micromachined ultrasonic transducer arrays and (CMOS) signal conditioning electronics on the same silicon substrate. Proc Ultrason Symp. 2001;941-5. |
| Noble et al., Low-temperature micromachined CMUTs with fully-integrated analogue front-end electronics. Proc Ultrason Symp. 2002;1045-50. |
| Oralkan et al., Volumetric Imaging Using 2D Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer Arrays (CMUTs): Initial Results. 2002 IEEE Ultrason Symp. 2002;1083-6. |
| Oralkan et al., Volumetric Ultrasound Imaging Using 2-D CMUT Arrays. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Contr. Nov. 2003;50(11):1581-94. |
| Park et al., Fabrication of Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers via Local Oxidation and Direct Wafer Bonding. J Microelectromechan Syst. Feb. 2011;20(1):95-103. |
| Torkkeli et al., Capacitative microphone with low-stress polysilicon membrane and high-stress polysilicon backplate. Sensors and Actuators. 2000;85:116-23. |
| Tsuji et al., Low Temperature Process for CMUT Fabrication with Wafer Bonding Technique. IEEE Intl Ultrason Symp Proc. 2010;551-4. |
| Um et al., An Analog-Digital-Hybrid Single-Chip RX Beamformer with Non-Uniform Sampling for 2D-CMUT Ultrasound Imaging to Achieve Wide Dynamic Range of Delay and Small Chip Area. IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. Feb. 12, 2014;426-8. |
| Wodnicki et al., Multi-Row Linear CMUT Array Using CMUTs and Multiplexing Electronics. Proc Ultrason Symp. 2009;2696-9. |
| Wolffenbuttel et al., Low-temperature silicon wafer-to-wafer bonding using gold at eutectic temperature. Sensors and Actuators A. 1994;43:223-9. |
| Wygant et al., Integration of 2D CMUT Arrays with Front-End Electronics for Volumetric Ultrasound Imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Contr. Feb. 2008;55(2):327-42. |
| Xu et al., Characterization of improved Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers (CMUTS) using ALD high- [Kappa] dielectric isola. MEMS. 2014 IEEE 27th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems. Jan. 26, 2014;584-7. |
| Yu et al., Dual-bottom-electrode CMUT based on standard CMOS process. NEMS. 2001 IEEE International Conference. Feb. 20, 2011;21-4. |
| Zahorian et al., Single chip CMUT arrays with integrated CMOS electronics: fabrication process development and experimental results. Proc Ultrason Symp. 2008;386-9. |
| Zhuang et al., Integration of trench-isolated through-wafer interconnects with 2d capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer arrays. Sensors Actuators A. 2007;138:221-9. |
| Zhuang et al., Wafer-bonded 2-D CMUT arrays incorporating through-wafer trench-isolated interconnects with a supporting frame. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. Jan. 2009;56(1):182-92. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1018. |
| Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated Jan. 23, 2017 for Application No. PCT/US2016/064325. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 7, 2017 for Application No. PCT/US2016/064325. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170157646 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |