The present invention relates generally to the field of bicycles and specifically to front suspensions for bicycles.
Many bicycles have rigid frames that provide little shock absorbing capabilities and instead rely on pneumatic tires to smooth out the bumps on the riding surface. Mountain bikes are specifically designed for off-road riding and are often equipped with front and/or rear shock absorbers to cushion impact on the wheels. These shock absorbers typically have spring-biased and damped telescoping members that will absorb impacts on the wheels.
Bicycle shock absorbers can be heavy and can also have a considerable amount of unsprung weight. Both of these features can be a significant disadvantage on a road bicycle, for which light weight and precise handling are considered very important.
The present invention provides a bicycle comprising front and rear wheels, a frame supported on the front and rear wheels and including a front fork. The front fork comprises a steerer tube defining a steering axis, a fork blade coupled to and extending downward relative to the steerer tube, and a fork tip coupled between the fork blade and the front wheel. The fork tip includes a first arm extending at an angle of 20-100 degrees (preferably 40-85 degrees, and more preferably 66 degrees) relative to the steering axis, a second arm extending at an angle of 50-140 degrees (preferably 70-120 degrees, and more preferably 114 degrees) relative to the steering axis, and an axle support coupled between the second arm and the front wheel. In one embodiment, the first arm and second arm define a gap, and the fork tip further includes a resilient member positioned in the gap.
Other aspects of the invention will become apparent by consideration of the detailed description and accompanying drawings.
Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways.
Referring to
Referring to
The illustrated fork 20 has an effective blade length L from the lower headset bearing 31 to the center 62 of the front axle of about 369 mm and a rake R from the steering axis 30 to the center 62 of about 49 mm. The second center 52 is spaced forward of the center 62 by a distance D1 of about 38 mm, which is about 78% of the rake R.
When viewed from the side, the centerline 58 of the first arm 42 is positioned at a first steering angle α of 66° relative to the steering axis 30 and at a first blade angle θ of 59° relative to the lower blade axis 38. Also, when viewed from the side, the centerline 60 of the second arm 46 is positioned at a second arm angle γ of 45° relative to the centerline 58 of the first arm 42 and at a second steering angle δ of 114° relative to the steering axis 30. Each of the first and second arms 42, 46 is sufficiently strong and flexible to resiliently support the entire weight supported by the fork tip 36. In a preferred embodiment, the fork tip has a stiffness that results in 2 mm-4 mm of travel when riding on the expected road surface.
Referring to
The fork 20 further includes a resilient member 80 positioned in the gap 70. The resilient member 80 provides additional resilient support to the fork tip 36. The resilient member 80 includes an upper concave surface 82 shaped to receive the convex lower surface 72, a middle concave surface 84 shaped to receive the convex rear surface 76, and a lower concave surface 86 shaped to receive the convex upper surface 74. The upper, middle, and lower concave surfaces 82, 84, 86 are contiguous with each other. As a result of the illustrated and described arrangement, the resilient member 80 is shaped to fit completely and securely within the gap 70.
The illustrated resilient member 80 comprises a polyurethane elastomer having a hardness less than the hardness of the first and second arms 42, 46. In the preferred embodiment, the resilient member 80 is permanently secured in the gap 70, such as by adhesive. Alternatively, the resilient member can be held in place in any other appropriate manner, such as using an interference fit, mechanical engagement, or fasteners.
The resilient member 80 can be secured in the gap 70 in such a manner that it can removed from the gap 70 by the user so that a different resilient member can be used. For example, if the resilient member 80 becomes damaged or worn, a replacement resilient member can be substituted. Alternatively, if it is desired to achieve a different resiliency, a resilient member having a different stiffness can be used. For example, if it desired to increase the stiffness of the fork tip 36, a resilient member having less resiliency can be substituted into the gap 70. Such a replacement resilient member could use a stiffer material or a thicker cross-section, for example.
Referring to
Various features of the invention are set forth in the following claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/779,874 filed on Mar. 13, 2013, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1036263 | Kittle | Aug 1912 | A |
1517168 | Rogers | Nov 1924 | A |
2073736 | Duffy | Mar 1937 | A |
4186936 | Offenstadt et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4533153 | Tsunoda et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
5064212 | Yun | Nov 1991 | A |
RE34009 | Schilplin | Jul 1992 | E |
5364115 | Klein et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5382037 | Chang et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5398954 | Chonan | Mar 1995 | A |
5427397 | Chonan | Jun 1995 | A |
5431426 | Ijams et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5899478 | Woodside | May 1999 | A |
5906385 | Voss | May 1999 | A |
5931487 | Koppelberg et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6152472 | Woodside | Nov 2000 | A |
6155370 | Iwai et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6336647 | Iwai et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6517096 | Yih | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6896276 | Sparrow | May 2005 | B1 |
7841612 | French | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20020063410 | Buckmiller et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20090236817 | French | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20110316251 | Lumpkin | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1517168 | Jul 1978 | GB |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2014/018315 dated Jun. 6, 2014 (7 pages). |
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/018315 dated Jun. 6, 2014 (6 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140265225 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61779874 | Mar 2013 | US |