The invention relates to the field of bicycle trainers for temporarily attaching a bicycle to a frame and for providing variable resistance to pedaling during a training course.
Bicycle trainers have been used in various forms for many decades. Early versions of stationary bicycles allowed a user to pedal on a stand for exercise. See U.S. Pat. No. 4,958,832 (Kim 1990). Over time, technology has progressed to a point where stationary bicycles are computerized for various training options. The computerized exercise equipment allows a rider to simulate hills by adjusting the position of the bicycle and to vary resistance to pedaling via a control system attached to the gears in place on the equipment. One problem with stationary bicycles is that each user has to adjust the settings for their own preferences. Additionally, the stationary bicycle must come in a one-size-fits-all version, meaning that the user has limited options in features such as seat style and tire size.
Over time, the market increased to a point where individualized trainers have been developed, allowing users to attach their personal bicycle to a portable trainer. For example, one brand that has been successful to date is known as CycleOps®. The CycleOps® incorporates a means of adding resistance to the back tire revolution and thereby varying the resistance to pedaling a temporarily attached bicycle.
U.S. Patent Application Nos. 2004/0053751 (Pizolato 2004) and 2005/0209064 (Peterson 2005) disclose modern style bicycle trainers that attach to the back tire of a standard bicycle. The Pizolato '751 application provides a connection to the rear axle of a bicycle with latitude for side to side movement when the rider faces an increased resistance to pedaling. An electrical control generator provides the resistance to pedaling. The Peterson '064 application provides a rear tire mount but requires removing the front tire to exercise on the bicycle. Springs at the back of the trainer provide a righting force when the user stands to pedal. Peterson discloses fluid-filled cylinders, magnetic assemblies, and airflow devices to control the resistance to pedaling.
Other developments in bicycle trainers include mechanisms for adjusting the front tire of a bicycle during trainer exercises. U.S. Pat. No. 7,083,551 (Lassanske 2006) provides a mechanical apparatus for lifting the front tire of a bicycle connected to a trainer frame at the back tire. The Lassanske patent, however, requires the user to manually place the front tire of the bicycle in a one of several select positions at different heights. Generally, the Lassanske device uses a pedestal for raising the front end of the bicycle via several support members.
U.S. Patent Application No. 2007/0004565 (Gebhardt 2007) provides a more extensive combination of trainer options by attaching the rearward driven tire on the bicycle to a trainer frame with a resistance device pressing against the back tire. The front of the trainer lifts the bicycle up and down, and the front and back parts of the trainer are electronically controlled for a more realistic riding experience. In preferred embodiments, the Gebhardt patent application utilizes linear actuator motors electronically controlled by a common signal to determine the height of the front tire lift and the resistance of the resistance device. Gebhardt also connects the front tire lift and rear tire resistance via cabling, bearing assemblies, and mechanical linkage assemblies. Gebhardt adjusts the rear tire position during front tire elevation changes only by an apparently stationary axle clamp.
More modern bicycle trainers also include electronics to control the tire position and resistance to pedaling in a training scenario. U.S. Patent Application No. 2002/0055422 (Airmet 2002) discloses a training apparatus for temporarily attaching a standard bicycle to a trainer controlled by electronic inputs. The trainer simulates an environment where the operator experiences three-dimensional motion and pedaling resistance similar to that of riding a real bicycle. The resistance to pedaling is a variable electromagnetic resistor controlled by input from interactive data received from an associated control system. The rear tire of the bicycle is held in place by axle locking mechanisms that are fixed in place. A rocker assembly allows the bicycle to simulate turns by tilting the bicycle left and right at angles that are in accordance with the rider's position and commands from the control system. The Airmet '422 application, however, provides no way to adjust the front tire elevation or any adjustments to front and back translation of the bicycle.
Other trainers with electronic components connected thereto include U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0073546 (Lassanske 2003) (showing a generator connected to the rear tire for powering the trainer components); 2005/0008992 (Westergaard 2005); and 2006/0229163 (Waters 2006). Each of these publications includes components necessary for electronically controlling a bicycle's position on a trainer. While these documents show various combinations of front tire and rear tire lifts that a rider can use to maneuver a bicycle in a simulated training circuit, none of these embodiments provides for new ways of controlling the resistance element engaging the back tire. Furthermore, none of these published patent applications provides for any forward and backward translation of the bicycle during times of raising and lowering the front tire.
Accordingly, there exists a need in the art of bicycle trainers for an apparatus that allows for electronic simulation of real world bicycle courses in a stationary trainer. The trainer preferably includes improved mechanisms for applying resistance to the rear bicycle tire and allows for limited bicycle movement that is still sufficient to provide a more realistic training experience.
The invention is a bicycle trainer to which a standard bicycle temporarily attaches for exercise and simulated rides. A lifting mechanism raises and lowers the front tire, and in preferred embodiments, a frame engages the rear tire to hold the rear tire in an elevated position against a resistance cylinder. The resistance cylinder provides a force against rear tire revolution. In one preferred embodiment, the trainer is characterized by the frame including rear tire supports that allow the bicycle to translate forward and backward as necessary to simulate uphill and downhill riding courses. In this embodiment, translation of the bicycle creates variable resistance as a function of the rear tire pressure against the frame's resistance cylinder.
The forward/backward translation of the bicycle is necessary during training maneuvers that include raising and lowering the front tire. In a preferred embodiment, the forward and backward movement is made possible by rollers temporarily attached to the rear bicycle tire axle and the trainer frame. The rollers, and therefore the bicycle as well, are allowed limited forward and backward movement to enhance the simulated riding experience as the front end of the trainer raises up and down.
In other preferred embodiments, the trainer includes a selection of mechanisms for controlling the amount of resistance applied to the rear tire. As noted above, one source of rear tire revolution is a resistance cylinder against which the rear tire turns. The resistance cylinder may incorporate a resistance fluid to provide variable resistance to rear tire movement.
The resistance fluid in the cylinder provides an opportunity for additional control of the resistance to pedaling. The resistance to pedaling may be determined by the volume of resistance fluid in the cylinder. In this embodiment, the cylinder may include baffles that turn within the fluid in direct response to pedaling the back tire (i.e., the more fluid in the cylinder, the more resistance the baffles encounter). In one preferred embodiment, the volume of resistance fluid changes by pumping the resistance fluid into and out of a reservoir associated with the resistance cylinder.
Pumping the resistance fluid into and out of the reservoir allows additional embodiments of the invention. For example, dual pumps may be used to displace a high density resistance fluid in one direction while adding a lower density resistance fluid from an opposite end of the reservoir. The density of the resistance fluid, therefore, provides another means of controlling the resistance faced by the baffles turning within the resistance fluid.
In another embodiment, the rear tire resistance is controlled by a tilting mechanism that allows the body of the bicycle to tilt back and forth against the resistance cylinder as the front tire is lifted up and down. The pivoting of the bicycle about this tilting mechanism creates a variable resistance as a function of rear tire pressure against the cylinder attached to the trainer. In other words, the bicycle is lifted in front and allowed to traverse an arcuate path to provide varying pressure of the back tire against the resistance cylinder.
The invention disclosed herein further includes other mechanisms for controlling the resistance that the back tire encounters during a work out. The resistance cylinder may be controlled by cabling that loosens and tightens in accordance with the front lifting mechanism operation. The resistance cylinder may also engage the back tire at various pressure levels controlled by hydraulic lifts or even a lever having ends that are controlled by a common energy source.
The invention is a bicycle trainer (10) that provides variable resistance to pedaling and allows for a rider to simulate a real-world bicycle course, including maneuvering up and down hilly terrain. Overall, the trainer (10) engages both the front tire (25) and the back tire (26) of the bicycle (12) and adjusts each according to the rider's preferences for training. One useful aspect of the disclosed trainer is its ability to accommodate an individual's personal bicycle (12). In other words, the trainer (10) does not include built-in biking equipment but lets a rider use his own bicycle (12) in a training situation.
The invention includes diverse mechanisms for controlling the resistance to pedaling that a user encounters when using the trainer (10). Each embodiment of the trainer includes parts and mechanisms that are interchangeable among each other. In other words, the invention is not limited to specific embodiments of the invention as set forth in the drawings and claims, but each embodiment may utilize features from the other embodiments. Furthermore, each embodiment and combination of the invention described herein incorporates standard electrical circuitry and computerized systems that are known in the art of control systems. The drawings schematically represent the portions of the device that enable full utilization, but the drawings are not intended to limit the invention to any particular arrangement for standard electrical components (i.e., power circuits, control circuits, cables, and associated connectors).
In the embodiment of
To ensure that the bicycle (12) is steady during the lifting and lowering motions, the platform (19) may include a groove or slot (16) in which the front tire (25) remains during the training exercise. A securing mechanism (not shown) is available to hold the front tire (25) in place. Options for the securing mechanism include a rod or pin that engages the lifting mechanism (15) and crosses over a portion of the front tire (25) (through the spokes) to the other side of the lifting mechanism (15).
The trainer (10) also incorporates a bicycle-holding frame (20) that, in a preferred embodiment, holds the rear tire (26) of the bicycle (12). The frame (20) incorporates a rear tire support (22) that lifts the rear tire (26) off the ground or floor and simultaneously allows the bicycle (12) to translate forward and backward as the lifting mechanism (15) raises and lowers the front tire (25). The frame (20) further includes a resistance cylinder (30) attached to the frame (20) and pressing against the rear tire (26) for providing a source of resistance to the rear tire (26). A resistance fluid (not shown) fills the resistance cylinder (30) and baffles (215) in the resistance cylinder (30) rotate within the resistance fluid as the bicycle rear tire's revolution turns the resistance cylinder (30). The baffles (215) within the resistance fluid resist cylinder revolution, adding to the intensity of the workout on the trainer (10).
The overall resistance that the rider faces on the trainer (10) is determined predominantly, however, by the pressure of the rear tire (26) against the resistance cylinder (30). This pressure, in turn, is determined by the height of the lifting mechanism (15) at any given time. In other words, when the lifting mechanism (15) raises the front tire (25) to a maximum height, the rear tire (26) braces against the resistance cylinder (30) to the maximum extent possible because the bicycle (12) translates backward to the farthest rearward position. When the lifting mechanism (15) is in its lowest position, the force of the rear tire (26) against the resistance cylinder (30) is at a minimum. Accordingly, the lifting mechanism (15) allows the rider to simulate an extreme uphill climb or a less difficult flat or downhill ride.
Allowing the bicycle (12) to translate forward and backward provides the trainer (10) with a way of modulating the force of the rear tire (26) on the resistance cylinder (30). In one embodiment, the frame (20) incorporates the necessary parts to provide a rear tire (26) support for lifting the rear tire (26) to a constant elevated position. In a preferred embodiment, the rear tire support (22) includes a pair of caps (23) for engaging the rear tire axle on either side. The caps (23) are configured to engage rollers (45) that provide forward and backward translation as the lifting mechanism (15) raises the front tire up and down.
A U-bar (48) or other bracket surrounds the rear tire (26) and the rear tire support (22) to hold the rear tire (26) and the rear tire support (22) in place.
For riders who prefer fewer parts to assemble on the trainer, the U-Bar (48) may be welded or attached by screws to the trainer (10). This embodiment requires the U-bar (48) to remain stationary and attached to the frame (20) even when the bicycle (12) is not positioned on the trainer.
A pair of translational platforms (50) give the rear tire (26) a surface on which the bicycle (12) can move forward and backward as necessary during the lifting of the front tire (25). To achieve the forward and backward translation, the trainer (10) accommodates rollers (45), as noted above, attached to the rear tire axle (27) of the bicycle (12). The rollers (45) engage the translation platforms (50) and allow the bicycle (12) to move back and forth as the lifting mechanism (15) moves up and down. In other words, the translation platforms (50) indirectly control the extent to which the bicycle (12) moves toward or away from the resistance cylinder (30) when the height of the front tire (25) is changing with the position of the lifting mechanism (15). Again, to ensure that the overall trainer (10) is stable, the trainer frame (20) includes appropriate mechanisms for supporting the rear tire (26) during times of movement. The frame (20) includes the option of a U-bar (48), or any U-shaped bracket, for securing the rollers (45) to the axle and holding the rear tire (26) steady when attached to the frame (20).
The trainer frame (20) includes a base (28) that engages the floor or the ground and support rods (29) that lift the rear tire (26) of the bicycle (12) to a desired elevation. In one embodiment, the support rods (29) lift the rear tire (26) to an elevation that allows the front tire (25) lifting mechanism (15) to simulate both uphill and down hill bicycle course.
The trainer frame (20) is generally stationary and allows movement of the associated bicycle (12). As noted above, the resistance to pedaling is determined by the amount of force with which the rear tire (26) engages the resistance cylinder (30). To ensure a minimum amount of force at all times, the trainer (10) attaches via a retraction spring (41) to the U-bar (48) holding the rear tire support (22) mechanisms in place. The tension in that spring (41) determines the absolute minimum amount of contact between the resistance cylinder (30) and the rear tire (26). In a preferred embodiment, the retraction spring (41) is biased to pull the rear tire (26) toward the resistance cylinder (30). In other embodiments, the retraction spring may be adjustable (i.e., attached by a threaded screw or other mechanism allowing for adjustment to the spring's span).
In another preferred embodiment of the trainer (10), the resistance cylinder (30) is at least partially filled with resistance fluid for providing variable resistance to rear tire (26) movement, wherein the resistance is a function of (i) increased or decreased volume of resistance fluid in the resistance cylinder (30), (ii) the density of the resistance fluid, (iii) the force with which the rear tire (26) engages the resistance cylinder (30); or (iv) combinations of (i) to (iii). In one embodiment, the resistance to pedaling is controlled predominantly by the resistance fluid (i.e., the resistance to pedaling the back tire (26) is determined by (i) increased or decreased volume of resistance fluid in the resistance cylinder (30); or (ii) the density of the resistance fluid; or (iii) a combination of (i) and (ii)).
Controlling resistance to pedaling at the point where the rear tire (26) engages the resistance cylinder (30) is also affected by a constant pressure spring (40). The constant pressure spring (40) biases the resistance cylinder (30) toward the rear tire (26) of the bicycle (12). In a preferred embodiment, the resistance cylinder (30) is positioned on a trainer bar (35) that extends from the base (28) of the trainer frame (20). The trainer bar (35) generally curves inwardly in a substantially vertical rise toward the translation platforms (50). The trainer bar (35) is attached to the base (28) of the trainer frame (20) at its lower end via a pivoting bolt (60) that allows the trainer bar (35) latitude of arcuate movement about the lower pivot point (60). The constant pressure spring (40) pulls the trainer bar (35) downward toward the base (28) by connecting to the underside of the trainer bar (35) and the back end of the base (28) of the trainer frame (20). The constant pressure spring (40) thereby biases the resistance cylinder (30) toward an attached bicycle (12).
As noted above, resistance to pedaling can be controlled in four generally different ways—(i) increased or decreased volume of resistance fluid in the resistance cylinder (30), (ii) the density of the resistance fluid, (iii) the force with which the rear tire (26) engages the resistance cylinder (30); or (iv) various combinations of (i) to (iii). In a preferred embodiment, the trainer (10) includes a mechanism for controlling the resistance to rear tire revolution at the point of the resistance cylinder (30). As shown in
In this embodiment (
In a most preferred embodiment, the trainer (10) includes a mechanism for pumping the resistance fluid into and out of the resistance cylinder (30). In this way, the trainer (10) has the ability to vary the resistance to pedaling in proportion to the amount of resistance fluid in the resistance cylinder (30). The pumping mechanism can be any of the numerous pumps (225A, 225B) known in the industry today. In
Embodiments of the resistance cylinder (30) utilizing a pump (225) allow for additional versions of the trainer. Without limiting the invention to any one resistance cylinder (30), the invention includes embodiments that pump more than one kind of resistance fluid into and out of the reservoir (227). For example, the reservoir of
The resistance fluid of this invention can be any stable fluid used in the art of bicycle trainers for providing resistance to rear tire revolution. Without limiting the invention to any particular resistance fluid, various grades of oil, polymer compositions, water-based emulsions, and other fluids can be used. The entire pumping mechanism may be attached to the trainer bar (35) as shown in
The trainer (10) disclosed herein is directly compatible with electronic control systems that coordinate the training experience preferred by the rider. Each embodiment disclosed herein is entirely compatible with an electronic control system, but one overall example is shown in
The control module (200) associated with the trainer (10) electronically connects the height controller (18) of the lifting mechanism (15) with a resistance controller (210) connected to the resistance cylinder (30) for a unified approach to a planned training session. The control module (200), then, incorporates a computerized method of simulating a training circuit on a bicycle (12) by electronically connecting the height controller (18) that modulates the front tire (25) lifting height and the resistance controller (210) that directs a pump (225) to move resistance fluid into and out of the resistance cylinder (30) in real time.
The trainer (10) described herein also embodies a means of generating its own power for situations in which electricity is either unavailable or undesirable. One option, of course, is to incorporate battery power into the trainer design. Another option is the use of a generator to provide electrical power to the trainer components. The generator (300), shown in
The embodiment of
The trainer frame of
As the lifting mechanism (15) shown in
In operation, the embodiments of
As shown at the front end of the trainer (10) in
The resistance cylinder (30) of
The embodiments of
As noted above, each embodiment of this invention is suitable for use with an electronic control system that coordinates the training experience by adjusting the rear tire resistance and the front tire height. The front tire height, of course, is controlled by lifting mechanism (15).
It is entirely within the scope of the invention for all embodiments of the trainer to accommodate electronic control circuitry for controlling pumps, hydraulics, mechanical moving parts, and the front end lift. The electronic controls may be used in conjunction with known electronic players such as CD-Roms and other media that allow a user to simulate a real world geographical bicycle course via the trainer described herein. In this regard, the controller (200) shown in
Those having skill in the art will recognize that the invention may be embodied in many different types of trainers that use multiple combinations of the features noted above. Accordingly, the invention is not limited to the particular structures or software illustrated herein. In the drawings and specification there has been set forth a preferred embodiment of the invention, and although specific terms have been employed, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention being defined in the claims.
This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 12/206,696 filed Sep. 8, 2008 (Bicycle Trainer with Variable Resistance to Pedaling) and scheduled to issue as U.S. Pat. No. 7,766,798. This application also incorporates entirely by reference commonly-owned application Ser. No. 12/270,223 filed Nov. 13, 2008(Bicycle Trainer with Variable Magnetic Resistance to Pedaling) and Ser. No. 12/725,654 filed Mar. 17, 2010 (Modular Tire with Variable Tread Surfaces).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0627483 | Comly | Jun 1899 | A |
1661679 | Privett | Mar 1928 | A |
2462018 | Wood | Feb 1949 | A |
2972478 | Vincent | Feb 1961 | A |
4506676 | Duska | Mar 1985 | A |
4645199 | Bloemendaal | Feb 1987 | A |
4752066 | Housayama | Jun 1988 | A |
4813062 | Gilpatrick | Mar 1989 | A |
4955600 | Hoffenberg et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4958832 | Kim | Sep 1990 | A |
5031901 | Saarinen | Jul 1991 | A |
5110118 | Winey | May 1992 | A |
5193106 | DeSena | Mar 1993 | A |
5236069 | Peng | Aug 1993 | A |
RE34479 | Minoura | Dec 1993 | E |
5382208 | Hu | Jan 1995 | A |
5545982 | Vlakancic | Aug 1996 | A |
5656001 | Baatz | Aug 1997 | A |
5916067 | Morasse | Jun 1999 | A |
5944637 | Stickler et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6042517 | Gunther et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6116415 | Rastelli | Sep 2000 | A |
6450922 | Henderson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6508745 | Schenk et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6568446 | Schulte | May 2003 | B1 |
6712737 | Nusbaum | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6857992 | Kolda et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6910992 | Arguilez | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6945916 | Schroeder | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6945917 | Baatz | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6964633 | Kolder et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7011607 | Kolda et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7083551 | Lassanske et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7226395 | Wu et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7303510 | Gebhardt | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7311640 | Baatz | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7314434 | Chen | Jan 2008 | B2 |
D593625 | Pedrini | Jun 2009 | S |
7628739 | Gearon | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7766798 | Hamilton | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20020055422 | Airmet et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020193207 | Wang | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030073546 | Lassanske et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040053751 | Pizolato | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050008992 | Westergaard et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050209064 | Peterson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060229163 | Waters | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070004565 | Gebhardt | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20100062909 | Hamilton | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100298103 A1 | Nov 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12206696 | Sep 2008 | US |
Child | 12849204 | US |