The present disclosure is generally directed to molecular sensors and more particularly to molecular sensors in which a binding probe closes the circuit between two electrodes.
The broad field of molecular electronics was introduced in the 1970s by Aviram and Ratner. Molecular electronics achieves the ultimate scaling down of electrical circuits by using single molecules as circuit components. Molecular circuits comprising single molecule components can function diversely as switches, rectifiers, actuators and sensors, depending on the nature of the molecule. Of particular interest is the application of such circuits as sensors, where molecular interactions provide a basis for single molecule sensing. In particular, informative current changes could include an increase, a decrease, a pulse, or other time variation in the current.
Notwithstanding the achievements in the field of molecular electronics, new molecular circuits that can function as molecular sensors are still needed. In particular, the need still exists for improved single molecule systems that can yield molecular information with greater signal-to-noise ratios such that signals truly indicative of molecular interactions are distinguishable from non-informative noise.
In various embodiments, single molecule binding probe-based circuits are disclosed wherein a single binding probe molecule is directly connected to a positive and negative electrode to form the circuit. These circuits are capable of yielding highly informative signals of binding activity. These improved signals have greater signal-to-noise levels such that the signals are more distinguishable from noise, and these improved signals include features that carry detailed information about the engagement between the binding probe and the target binding partner.
In various embodiments, a molecular sensor comprises a binding probe-based molecular circuit (conductive pathway) such as described herein. Such a sensor is usable to sense the binding of a target to the binding probe, and thereby identify the target as being present in a given test solution. This provides the basis of using such a sensor to detect the presence or absence of a target molecule, or to obtain information on the concentration of a target molecule, in a test solution. Consequently, a binding of a target molecule to the binding probe active site is sensed as an electrical change in the circuit, such as a change in the voltage, current, impedance, conductance or resistance of the circuit.
In various embodiments of the present disclosure, a molecular circuit is disclosed. The circuit comprises: a positive electrode; a negative electrode spaced apart from the positive electrode; and a binding probe connected to both the positive and negative electrodes to form a conductive pathway between the positive and negative electrodes.
In various aspects, the binding probe of the circuit may comprise a first wiring point connected to the positive electrode and a second wiring point connected to the negative electrode.
In various aspects, the circuit may further comprise at least one arm molecule having two ends, one end bonded to the binding probe and the other end bonded to at least one of the electrodes, wherein the at least one arm molecule acts as an electrical wire between the binding probe and at least one of the electrodes.
In various aspects, the at least one arm molecule may be selected from the group consisting of a double stranded oligonucleotide, a peptide nucleic acid duplex, a peptide nucleic acid-DNA hybrid duplex, a protein alpha-helix, a graphene-like nanoribbon, a natural polymer, a synthetic polymer, and an antibody Fab domain.
In various aspects, at least one of the electrodes is connected to an internal structural element of the binding probe.
In various aspects, the internal structural element may be selected from the group consisting of an alpha-helix, a beta-sheet, and a multiple of such elements in series.
In various aspects, at least one of the electrodes may be connected to the binding probe at a location of the binding probe capable of undergoing conformational changes.
In various aspects, at least one arm molecule may comprise a molecule having tension, twist or torsion dependent conductivity.
In various aspects, the binding probe may be connected to both the positive and negative electrodes from more than two locations in the binding probe.
In various aspects, the binding probe may comprise an antibody Fab binding domain.
In various aspects, the binding probe may comprise an aptamer.
In various aspects, the binding probe may comprise a nucleic acid oligomer hybridization probe.
In various aspects, a molecular sensor comprises a circuit further comprising a positive electrode; a negative electrode spaced apart from the positive electrode; and a binding probe comprising an antibody Fab binding domain connected to both the positive and negative electrodes to form a conductive pathway between the positive and negative electrodes, wherein the sensor is usable to sense information on the presence of, or concentration of a corresponding antibody antigen in a test solution.
In various aspects, a molecular sensor comprises a circuit further comprising a positive electrode; a negative electrode spaced apart from the positive electrode; and a binding probe comprising an aptamer connected to both the positive and negative electrodes to form a conductive pathway between the positive and negative electrodes, wherein the sensor is usable to sense information on the presence of, or concentration of a target molecule of the aptamer in a test solution.
In various aspects, a molecular sensor comprises a circuit further comprising a positive electrode; a negative electrode spaced apart from the positive electrode; and a binding probe comprising a nucleic acid oligomer hybridization probe connected to both the positive and negative electrodes to form a conductive pathway between the positive and negative electrodes, wherein the sensor is usable to sense information on the presence of, or concentration of a target DNA or RNA molecule in a test solution.
In various aspects, binding probes comprising an antibody Fab binding domain, an aptamer, or a nucleic acid oligomer hybridization probe may be engineered to have additional charge groups that variably influence the conductive pathway as the binding probe engages with a target.
In various aspects of a circuit comprising a positive electrode; a negative electrode spaced apart from the positive electrode; and a binding probe connected to both the positive and negative electrodes to form a conductive pathway between the positive and negative electrodes, the connection between the binding probe and at least one of the positive electrode and negative electrode may comprise at least one of a native cysteine, a genetically engineered cysteine, a genetically engineered amino acid with a conjugation residue, or a genetically engineered peptide domain comprising a peptide that has a conjugation partner.
In various aspects, molecular circuits disclosed herein may further comprise a gate electrode.
In various aspects, a method of detecting the concentration of an analyte in a solution comprises providing a circuit comprising a positive electrode; a negative electrode spaced apart from the positive electrode; and a binding probe capable of binding the analyte connected to both the positive and negative electrodes to form a conductive pathway between the positive and negative electrodes; initiating at least one of a voltage or a current through the circuit; exposing the circuit to the solution for a period of time; and measuring electrical signals through the circuit as the binding probe engages with the analyte, wherein the electrical signals are processed to identify features that provide information on the concentration of the analyte in the solution.
In various aspects, a method of molecular detection comprises providing a circuit comprising a positive electrode; a negative electrode spaced apart from the positive electrode; and a binding probe connected to both the positive and negative electrodes to form a conductive pathway between the positive and negative electrodes; initiating at least one of a voltage or a current through the circuit; exposing the circuit to at least one of: a buffer of reduced ionic strength, specific applied voltage on the primary electrodes, a gate electrode voltage, or voltage spectroscopy or sweeping applied to the primary electrodes or gate electrode; and measuring an electrical change in the circuit.
The subject matter of the present disclosure is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the concluding portion of the specification. A more complete understanding of the present disclosure, however, may best be obtained by referring to the detailed description and claims when considered in connection with the drawing figures:
The detailed description of exemplary embodiments herein makes reference to the accompanying drawings, which show exemplary embodiments by way of illustration and their best mode. While these exemplary embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the inventions detailed herein, it should be understood that other embodiments may be realized and that logical, chemical, and mechanical changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the inventions. Thus, the detailed description herein is presented for purposes of illustration only and not of limitation. For example, unless otherwise noted, the steps recited in any of the method or process descriptions may be executed in any order and are not necessarily limited to the order presented. Furthermore, any reference to singular includes plural embodiments, and any reference to more than one component or step may include a singular embodiment or step. Also, any reference to attached, fixed, connected or the like may include permanent, removable, temporary, partial, full and/or any other possible attachment option. Additionally, any reference to without contact (or similar phrases) may also include reduced contact or minimal contact.
In various embodiments of the present disclosure, a molecular circuit is disclosed. The molecular circuit comprises: a positive electrode; a negative electrode spaced apart from the positive electrode; and a binding probe connected to both the positive and negative electrodes to form a conductive pathway between the positive and negative electrodes. In various examples, the binding probe comprises a first wiring point connected to the positive electrode and a second wiring point connected to the negative electrode.
As used herein, the term “binding probe” means a molecule that acts to bind to another molecule, or a set of molecules, in a specific fashion. Common binding probe molecules used in biotechnology include single stranded DNA oligos, single stranded RNA oligos, either of which act as hybridization binding probes, aptamers (composed of peptides, DNA, RNA, PNA, LNA, etc.) which bind small molecule targets, and antibodies and various derivatives of antibodies that comprise the antibody Fab binding domains, which bind their cognate antigens or specific antigen epitopes. Common binding probes in biology include the broad family of immunoglobulin proteins, such as IgG, IgY, IgM, scFV, hcIgF, IgNAR, and other immunoglobulins, including native forms as well as genetically modified forms of these protein molecules. Such immunoglobulins bind to whatever epitope they have been defined to target, as produced by either in vivo immune responses, or direct engineering of the binding loops of such molecules, via the methods of synthetic biology. The binding domains of these immunoglobulins, or genetically modified forms thereof, such as Fab domains, are also binding probes.
Other well-known binding probes include the avidin family of proteins, which bind to biotin as a target. In certain embodiments, a binding probe comprises a genetically modified form of an avidin, such as Streptavidin, Neutravidin, Avidin, or any other member of the avidin family of proteins.
Binding probes for use herein may comprise single or multiple protein amino acid chains, such as IgG or antibody Fab domains which have heavy and light protein chains. Binding probes herein are optionally complexed with other types of molecules, such as RNA, polysaccharides, etc. Binding probes may bind a single target at one time, or may bind multiple targets at one time, such as in the case of IgG, which can bind two epitopes at one time. Aptamer binding probes are often comprised of RNA or peptides. Binding probes for nucleic acid hybridization are a special class of probes in which the probe oligomer binds and forms a helical duplex with the cognate binding target, and where such binding is based on the well-known complementary base pairings between the nucleic acid bases, A:T, C:G, and their various forms present in DNA, RNA, PNA, LNA or other nucleic acid analogs (designate generally as XNA), which undergo similar complementary or degenerate pairings.
As used herein, the term “target” for a binding probe refers to any of the molecules or molecular components that the binding probe specifically binds. For example, in the specific case an IgG antibody, the epitopes of the antibody are the targets, as are larger molecules or complexes that contain these epitopes.
As used herein, the term “buffer” for a binding probe refers to a solution in which the binding probe is viable and functional. Such a buffer may typically comprise salts, detergents, and surfactants, singly or in various combinations, as well as specific cofactors, along with the target molecules. Such a buffer may have its composition modified from standard forms, such as to enhance signal properties in a sensor exposed to the buffer.
As used herein, the term “electrode” means any structure that can act as an efficient source or sink of charge carriers. Most commonly these would be metal or semiconductor structures, such as those used in electronic circuits. A pair of spaced apart electrodes herein may comprise a source and drain electrode pair. In various embodiments of the present disclosure, a binding probe-based molecular circuit may further comprise a gate electrode. When present, a “gate” electrode is used to apply a voltage rather than transfer charge carriers. Thus it supports accumulation of charge carriers to produce a local electric field, but is not intended to pass current. A gate electrode will be electrically isolated from the primary conduction paths of the circuit by some form of insulating layer or material.
As used herein, the term “conjugation” means any of the wide variety of means of physically attaching one molecule to another, or to a surface or particle. Such methods typically involve forming covalent or non-covalent chemical bonds, but may also rely on protein-protein interactions, protein-metal interactions, or chemical or physical adsorption via intermolecular (Van der Waals) forces. There is a large variety of such methods known to those skilled in the art of conjugation chemistry. Common conjugation methods herein include, but are not limited to, thiol-metal bonds, maleimide-cysteine bonds, material binding peptides such as gold binding peptides, and click chemistries.
As used herein, the term “initiating,” in the context of an electrical parameter, is intended to be broader than the concept of “applying” an electrical value. For example, an electrical current may be initiated in a circuit. Such initiating of a current may be the result of applying a voltage to the circuit, but may be from other actions to the circuit besides applying a voltage. Further, a voltage may be initiated in a circuit. Such initiating of a voltage may be the result of applying a current to the circuit, but may be from other actions to the circuit besides applying an electrical current. In other examples, a voltage or a current may be initiated in one portion of a circuit as the result of applying a voltage or a current to the overall circuit. In a non-limiting example, a flow of electrons initiated from a negative to a positive electrode in a circuit of the present disclosure may be controlled by the voltage applied to the gate electrode of the circuit.
In various embodiments of the present disclosure, a molecular sensor comprises a binding probe connected to both a positive and a negative electrode to complete a circuit. Interactions of the binding probe with various targets are detectable as changes in the current or other electrical parameter measured across the circuit. The present molecular sensor differs from the general concept of a molecular electronic circuit in that the binding probe is directly “wired” to both the positive and negative electrodes rather than bonded to a molecular bridge molecule that spans the gap between the electrodes to complete a circuit.
In various aspects of the disclosure, at least one of a voltage or a current is initiated in a binding probe-based molecular circuit. When a target interacts with the binding probe, electrical changes in the circuit are sensed. These electrical changes, or informative electrical signals, may include current, voltage, impedance, conductivity, resistance, capacitance, or the like. In some examples, a voltage is initiated in the circuit and then changes in the current through the circuit are measured as targets interact with the binding probe. In other examples, a current is initiated in the circuit, and changes to voltage in the circuit are measured as targets interact with the binding probe. In other examples, impedance, conductivity, or resistance is measured. In examples wherein the circuit further comprises a gate electrode, such as positioned underneath the gap between the positive and negative electrodes, at least one of a voltage or current may be applied to the gate electrode, and voltage, current, impedance, conductivity, resistance, or other electrical change in the circuit may be measured as targets interact with the binding probe.
In contrast to the general molecular circuit concept as depicted in
In various embodiments, the binding probe may be coupled to both positive and negative electrodes at two or more points, such as to ensure that charge carriers traversing the molecular structure pass into and out of the binding probe.
As shown in the embodiment of
In various embodiments, molecular arms comprise some form of conjugation to the binding probe, as well as their conjugations or couplings to the electrodes. Many conjugation chemistries can be employed for this purpose. In a non-limiting example, such conjugation comprises chemical crosslinking, which can preferentially couple suitable chemical groups on the arms to amino acid residues on the binding probe. In various embodiments, a maleimide group on the arm couples to a surface cysteine on the binding probe. In other aspects, genetically modified versions of a binding probe may be created and employed, such as binding probe comprising specific amino acids or protein domains engineered into their amino acid structure that provide specific conjugation sites. For example, cysteine amino acids engineered at specific sites on the binding probe provide for the attachment point of arms that present a maleimide group. Two such cysteine sites conjugate to two maleimide derivatized arms to produce a configuration such as that shown in
In other embodiments, a peptide domain that specifically binds with a cognate group on the arms is engineered into the sequence of a protein component of a binding probe. In one such embodiment, a peptide that is an antigen to an antibody is engineered into the binding probe, and the Fab binding domain of the antibody is used on the arms. One such embodiment is to use the FLAG peptide motif DYKDD, and any suitable ANTI-FLAG Fab domain. Any other peptide antigens and their cognate Fab domains can similarly be used to conjugate arms to specific sites in an engineered protein, by engineering the peptide antigen into the desired conjugation sites on the binding probe. Other such peptide domains make use of the SPY-TAG/SPY-CATCHER protein-protein binding system, by engineering either the SPY-TAG domain or the SPY-CATCHER domain into a protein component of the binding probe, and placing the cognate domain in the arms. When engineering such peptide binding domains into the binding probe, another embodiment includes adding short linker peptide sequences flanking the target peptide, such as to enhance the availability of the domain for binding. Such short linkers may comprise short glycine and serine rich linkers, as are known to those skilled in the art of protein engineering, including, but not limited to, the linker amino acid sequences G, GS, GSG, GGSG, etc.
In various examples, the arm molecules comprise any molecules that provide for conduction of charge carriers into and out of the binding probe. In certain embodiments, such arms comprise molecular wires from the many forms known in field of molecular electronics, functionalized with suitable conjugation and binding groups for wiring to electrodes and binding probe. In various aspects, such arms may comprise single stranded DNA, double stranded DNA, peptide nucleic acids (PNAs), peptides, peptide alpha-helices, antibodies, Fab domains of antibodies, carbon nanotubes, graphene nanoribbons, natural polymers, synthetic polymers, other organic molecules with p-orbitals for electron delocalization, or metal or semiconductor nanorods or nanoparticles. In further embodiments, the arms may comprise double stranded DNA with thiol-bearing groups at one end, and maleimide at the other end that couples to the binding probe, or a peptide alpha-helix with a cysteine or gold binding peptide at one termini and a maleimide at the other end that couples to the binding probe, or a graphene nanoribbon with thiol-bearing groups at one end, and a maleimide bearing group at the other end that couples to the binding probe. In certain embodiments, two arm molecules used to couple a binding probe to two electrodes are identical molecules, and in other embodiments, the two arm molecules are different molecules. In some examples, there may be a “positive electrode” arm and a “negative electrode” arm, providing for oriented binding of a binding probe to the corresponding “positive” and “negative” electrodes in
In various embodiments, arm conjugation points connect directly to specific structural elements within the binding probe. A non-limiting example is illustrated in
In general, a protein component of a binding probe will have a 3D structure that includes well known secondary structural elements such as alpha-helices and beta-sheets. These are primarily hydrogen bonded structures that can provide discrete conduction paths through the body of the binding probe, to the extent that current carriers, such as electrons, may efficiently hop along such structures, or along the hydrogen bonds that define such structures, with less resistance than otherwise hopping or tunneling off such structures. These structures provide preferential conduction paths that will channel charge carriers, and by selecting such structures, charge is forced to pass close to active regions of the binding probe, and current-based sensing of the activity will be improved. Having the arms directly connected to such structures, or within a small number of amino acids of the termini of such structures, the current flowing along these desirable paths is maximized, and thus the desirable signals that come from the current along such paths is maximized. In this way, current going elsewhere within the binding probe is minimized, and thus the noise from probing these less informative regions is also minimized.
In various examples, the wiring can be to such structures that appear in the binding probe “in series,” such as for example, two alpha-helices in series as indicated in
In other embodiments, the arms 115 are wired to points 125 on the binding probe 130 that undergo conformation changes or relative motion during binding probe binding, such as illustrated in
In other aspects, conformational changes in the binding probe, such as when induced binding occurs between the binding probe and a substrate, are translated into a twist, torque or rotation of at least one arm, and that twist, torsion or rotation alters the conductivity of the arm. One such example is an arm comprising an organic polymer further comprising polycyclic aromatic rings, such as polythiophene or polyphenylene, whereby previously lined up p-orbitals are rotated out of alignment by C—C bond rotation when the arm is twisted, torqued or rotated in response to a binding probe conformational change. When the arm is twisted, torqued or rotated, the electrons have impeded delocalization through the n-system of the organic polymer. In certain embodiments, such impeded flow may act on only a subset of the charge carriers, depending on, for example, the polarization or other quantum state of the charge carrier, such as spin polarization of an electron charge carrier, or the momentum or energy state of the charge carrier.
Another example is illustrated in
As illustrated in
A sensor comprising a directly wired binding probe as an essential conduction path may have its signal performance enhanced through various environmental factors. For example, the choice of buffer, buffer additives, temperature and applied voltage may be modulated to improve the signal quality. In particular, since binding probes may complex with various cofactors that modulate their kinetics, and the salt levels in the buffer also impact binding probe kinetics, as does temperature, these factors may be used to improve signaling performance. In addition, the overall ionic strength of the buffer solution defines the Debye length in the solution, that is the distance over which electric fields extend in solution, and can impact the extent to which current carriers passing through the binding probe are influenced by the charge distributions of the binding probe and substrate, and thus buffer ionic strength or total salt concentration is another means of influencing or enhancing the signaling.
The applied driving voltage may be optimized to improve the signaling from a binding probe wired as an essential conduction path. Based on energy barriers within the binding probe, certain voltages may lead to improved signaling performance. In addition to an applied voltage, various embodiments may also have a gate electrode, such as a buried gate below the lower substrate indicated in
In general, the molecular circuit sensors of the present disclosure comprise the wiring of a binding probe with at least two points of electrical contact, so as to make the binding probe an essential conduction path, in contrast to the configuration of
In various embodiments, a molecular circuit sensor comprises a Fab antibody binding domain.
In various embodiments, a circuit comprises a binding probe wired in as an essential conduction path. The circuit may comprise first and second wiring points, connecting to a first and a second electrode such as a positive electrode and a negative electrode.
In various embodiments, the circuit may further comprise at least one arm molecule having two ends, one end bonded to the binding probe and the other end bonded to at least one of the electrodes, wherein the at least one arm molecule acts as an electrical wire between the binding probe molecule and at least one of the electrodes. Such an arm molecule may be selected from the group consisting of a double stranded oligonucleotide, a peptide nucleic acid (PNA) duplex, a PNA-DNA hybrid duplex, a protein alpha-helix, a graphene-like nanoribbon, a natural polymer, a synthetic organic molecule e.g. a synthetic polymer, and an antibody Fab domain. In other examples, the binding probe is wired directly to the electrodes without the use of any arm molecules. The wiring may be to an internal structural element in the binding probe, such as an alpha-helix, or a beta sheet, or multiple such elements in series, or in spatial proximity.
In various embodiments, a circuit comprises a binding probe wired at points that undergo relative conformational change. In certain aspects, arms comprise molecules that have a tension dependent conductivity. In other examples, arm molecules may have torsion or twist dependent conductivity. Additional wiring points may be used to couple the binding probe at additional sites.
In various embodiments, a circuit comprises an antibody or antibody Fab domain, such as for example, the Fab fragment binding lysozyme, wherein the wiring is major internal beta-sheets that directly interact internal to the protein structure. Such connection may rely on the placement of genetically engineered cysteines at or near these amino acid positions, or genetically engineering in other conjugation groups at specific sites. Circuits comprising an antibody Fab may be used to detect the presence of the antigen corresponding to the antibody.
A circuit in accordance to various embodiments of the present disclosure, comprising an antibody Fab domain, may be exposed to a solution potentially containing the corresponding antigen, and may be used to detect the presence of, or concentration of, the antigen.
The connection between the binding probe and at least one of the positive electrode and negative electrode may comprise any one of: a native cysteine, a genetically engineered cysteine, a genetically engineered amino acid with a conjugation residue, or a genetically engineered peptide domain comprising a peptide that has a conjugation partner. In certain aspects, the wiring is to points on a binding probe where such points undergo relative motion in excess of 0.5 nm as the binding probe engages its target. In other aspects, the binding probe is engineered to have extended domains that produce a greater range of relative motion as the binding probe engages its target. For example, conformation changes in a probe may be accentuated by extending various domains in the probe. A binding probe may also be engineered to have additional charge groups that variably influence the internal conduction path as the binding probe engages its target.
In various embodiments, a circuit is exposed to a solution comprising the targets of the binding probe. In some cases, the binding probe is a genetically modified form an antibody, antibody Fab domain, or an aptamer. In other examples, a circuit is exposed to one or more of the conditions of: a buffer of reduced ionic strength, specific applied voltage on the primary electrodes, a gate electrode voltage, or voltage spectroscopy or sweeping applied to the primary electrodes or gate electrode.
In various embodiments, the binding probe may be an entire IgG antibody molecule 215, as indicated in
In various embodiments, as indicated in
In other various embodiments, as indicated in
Furthermore, while a single instance of this sensor provides detection of the presence or absence of a single target molecule, the multiple application of this can be used to obtain information on the concentration of an analyte in a test solution. One embodiment of such a method is illustrated in
In certain examples, a method of performing a binding detection assay is disclosed. The method comprises: providing a binding probe-based molecular circuit having spaced-apart positive and negative electrodes and a binding probe molecule connected to both the positive and negative electrodes to form a conductive pathway between the electrodes; initiating at least one of a voltage or a current through the circuit; exposing the circuit to a solution potentially containing the target molecule; and measuring electrical signals through the circuit as the binding probe binds a target, wherein the electrical signals are processed to identify features that provide information on the proper binding of the probe to its target.
In other aspects, a method of molecular detection is disclosed. The method comprises: (a) providing a binding probe-based molecular circuit having spaced-apart positive and negative electrodes, a binding probe molecule connected to both the positive and negative electrodes to form a conductive pathway between the electrodes, and a gate electrode; (b) initiating at least one of a voltage or a current through the circuit; (c) exposing the circuit to at least one of: a buffer of reduced ionic strength, a specific applied voltage on the primary electrodes, a gate electrode voltage, or voltage spectroscopy or sweeping applied to the primary electrodes or gate electrode; and (d) measuring an electrical change in the circuit.
Binding probe-based molecular sensors and methods of making and using same are provided. References to “various embodiments”, “one embodiment”, “an embodiment”, “an example embodiment”, etc., indicate that the embodiment described may include a particular feature, structure, or characteristic, but every embodiment may not necessarily include the particular feature, structure, or characteristic. Moreover, such phrases are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Further, when a particular feature, structure, or characteristic is described in connection with an embodiment, it is submitted that it is within the knowledge of one skilled in the art to affect such feature, structure, or characteristic in connection with other embodiments whether or not explicitly described. After reading the description, it will be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art(s) how to implement the disclosure in alternative embodiments.
Benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described with regard to specific embodiments. However, the benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any elements that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as critical, required, or essential features or elements of the disclosure. The scope of the disclosure is accordingly to be limited by nothing other than the appended claims, in which reference to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless explicitly so stated, but rather “one or more.” Moreover, where a phrase similar to ‘at least one of A, B, and C’ or ‘at least one of A, B, or C’ is used in the claims or specification, it is intended that the phrase be interpreted to mean that A alone may be present in an embodiment, B alone may be present in an embodiment, C alone may be present in an embodiment, or that any combination of the elements A, B and C may be present in a single embodiment; for example, A and B, A and C, B and C, or A and B and C.
All structural, chemical, and functional equivalents to the elements of the above-described various embodiments that are known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference and are intended to be encompassed by the present claims. Moreover, it is not necessary for a device or method to address each and every problem sought to be solved by the present disclosure, for it to be encompassed by the present claims. Furthermore, no element, component, or method step in the present disclosure is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether the element, component, or method step is explicitly recited in the claims. No claim element is intended to invoke 35 U.S.C. 112(f) unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for.” As used herein, the terms “comprises”, “comprising”, or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a molecule, composition, process, method, or device that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such molecules, compositions, processes, methods, or devices.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/015,049 filed on Jun. 21, 2018, (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,648,941), entitled “Binding Probe Circuits for Molecular Sensors,” which is a continuation of PCT Application No. PCT/US18/29393, filed on Apr. 25, 2018 entitled “Binding Probe Circuits for Molecular Sensors.” PCT Application No. PCT/US18/29393 claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/503,812 filed May 9, 2017 and entitled “Binding Probe Circuits for Molecular Sensors,” the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4923586 | Katayama et al. | May 1990 | A |
5082627 | Stanbro | Jan 1992 | A |
5194133 | Clark et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5366140 | Koskenmaki et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5414588 | Barbee, Jr. | May 1995 | A |
5486449 | Honso et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5532128 | Eggers et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5583359 | Ng et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5639507 | Galvagni et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646420 | Yamashita | Jul 1997 | A |
5767687 | Geist | Jun 1998 | A |
5871918 | Thorp et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5881184 | Guidash | Mar 1999 | A |
5965452 | Kovacs | Oct 1999 | A |
5982018 | Wark | Nov 1999 | A |
6051380 | Sosnowski et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6060023 | Maracas | May 2000 | A |
6094335 | Early | Jul 2000 | A |
6110354 | Saban | Aug 2000 | A |
6123819 | Peeters | Sep 2000 | A |
6144023 | Clerc | Nov 2000 | A |
6238927 | Abrams et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6440662 | Gerwen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6464889 | Lee et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6506564 | Mirkin et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6537747 | Mills, Jr. et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6670131 | Hashimoto | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673533 | Wohlstadter et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6716620 | Bashir et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6749731 | Kobori | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6762050 | Fukushima et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764745 | Karasawa et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6790341 | Saban | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6824974 | Pisharody et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6861224 | Fujita et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6916614 | Takenaka et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6958216 | Kelley | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7015046 | Wohlstadter et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7075428 | Oleynik | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7169272 | Fritsch et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7183055 | Van Der Weide | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7189435 | Tuominen et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7202480 | Yokoi et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7208077 | Albers et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7276206 | Augustine et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7399585 | Gau | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7432120 | Mascolo et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7470533 | Xu et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7507320 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7531120 | Van Rijn et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7579823 | Ayliffe | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7691433 | Kronholz et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7785785 | Pourmand et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7834344 | Mascolo et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7851045 | Gandon et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7886601 | Memssi et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7901629 | Calatzis et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7943394 | Flandre et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8241508 | D'Urso | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8313633 | Li et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8351181 | Ahn | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8591816 | Calatzis et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8652768 | Huber et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8753893 | Liu et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8927464 | Aizenberg et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8940663 | Iqbal et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9070733 | Rajagopal et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9108880 | Jin et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9139614 | Medintz | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9306164 | Chang et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9829456 | Merriman et al. | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9956743 | Jin et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10036064 | Merriman et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10125420 | Jin et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10151722 | Jin et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10508296 | Merriman et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10526696 | Jin et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10584410 | Jin et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10597767 | Merriman et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10648941 | Merriman | May 2020 | B2 |
10712334 | Choi et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
20020022223 | Connolly | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020090649 | Chan et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020137083 | Kobori et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138049 | Allen et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020142150 | Baumann et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020142477 | Lewis et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020172963 | Kelley et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184939 | Yadav | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030025133 | Brousseau | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040000 | Connolly et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040173 | Fonash | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030064390 | Schillein et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030087296 | Fujita et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109031 | Chafin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030141189 | Lee et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030141276 | Lee et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030186263 | Frey et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030224387 | Kunwar et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040014106 | Patno et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023253 | Kunwar et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040038090 | Faris | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040048241 | Freeman et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040063100 | Wang | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040086929 | Weide et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040096866 | Hoffman et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040012161 | Chiu | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040146863 | Pisharody et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040209355 | Edman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040209435 | Patridge et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040229247 | DeBoer et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040235016 | Hamers | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040248282 | Sobha M. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050029227 | Chapman | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050067086 | Ito et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074911 | Kornilovich et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050151541 | Brinz et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050156157 | Parsons et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164371 | Arinaga | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050172199 | Miller et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181195 | Dubrow | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050221473 | Dubin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050227373 | Flandre et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050247573 | Nakamura et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050285275 | Son | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287548 | Bao et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287589 | Connolly | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060003482 | Chinthakindi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060019273 | Connolly et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024504 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060024508 | D'Urso et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029808 | Zhai et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060051919 | Mascolo et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060051946 | Mascolo et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060105449 | Larmer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060105467 | Niksa et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060128239 | Nun et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060147983 | O'uchi | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060154489 | Tornow | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060275853 | Matthew et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070026193 | Luzinov et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070048748 | Williams et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070140902 | Calatzis et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070148815 | Chao et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070186628 | Curry et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070184247 | Simpson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070207487 | Emig et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070231542 | Deng | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080012007 | Li et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080098815 | Merassi et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080149479 | Olofsson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080199657 | Capron et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080199659 | Zhao | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090011222 | Xiu et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090017571 | Nuckolls | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090020428 | Levitan | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027036 | Nuckolls et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090062684 | Gregersen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090152109 | Whitehead et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162927 | Naaman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090170716 | Su et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090178935 | Reymond et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090295372 | Krstic et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090297913 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090306578 | Sivan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324308 | Law et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100038342 | Lim et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100044212 | Kim et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100055397 | Kurihara et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100132771 | Lu | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100142259 | Drndic et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149530 | Tomaru | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100167938 | Su et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100184062 | Steinmueller-Nethl et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188109 | Edel et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100194409 | Gao et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100201381 | Iqbal et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100206367 | Jeong et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100227416 | Koh et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100280397 | Feldman et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100285275 | Baca et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100285601 | Kong et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100288543 | Hung et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100300899 | Levine et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110056845 | Stellacci | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110065588 | Su et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110076783 | Liu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110091787 | McGrath et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110160077 | Chaisson et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166034 | Kwong et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110217763 | Rasooly et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110227558 | Mannion et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110229667 | Jin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110233075 | Soleymani et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110248315 | Nam et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110287956 | Iqbal et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291673 | Shibata et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110311853 | Fratti | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110312529 | He et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120060905 | Fogel et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120122715 | Gao et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120220046 | Chao | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120258870 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120286332 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120309106 | Eichen et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130049158 | Hong et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130071289 | Knoll | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130108956 | Lu et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130109577 | Korlach et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130162276 | Lee et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130183492 | Lee et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130214875 | Duncan et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130239349 | Knights et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130245416 | Yarmush et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130273340 | Neretina et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130281325 | Elibol et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130331299 | Reda et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140001055 | Elibol et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140011013 | Jin | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140018262 | Reda et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140048776 | Huang et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140054788 | Majima et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140057283 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140061049 | Lo et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140079592 | Chang et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140027775 | Quick et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140170567 | Sakamoto et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140174927 | Bashir et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140197459 | Kis et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140218637 | Gao et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140235493 | Zang et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140253827 | Gao et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140284667 | Basker et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140320849 | Chou et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140367749 | Bai et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140377900 | Yann et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150005188 | Levner et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150017655 | Huang et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150049332 | Sun et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150057182 | Merriman et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150065353 | Turner et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150068892 | Ueno et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150077183 | Ciubotaru | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150148264 | Esfandyarpour et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150177150 | Rothberg et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150191709 | Heron et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150263203 | Lewis et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150293025 | Ninomiya et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150294875 | Khondaker et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150344945 | Mandell et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160017416 | Boyanov et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160045378 | Geloen | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160155971 | Strachan et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160187282 | Gardner et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160265047 | van Rooyen et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160284811 | Yu et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160290957 | Ram | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160319342 | Kawai et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160377564 | Carmignani et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170023512 | Cummins et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170037462 | Turner et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170038333 | Turner et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170043355 | Fischer | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170044605 | Merriman | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170131237 | Ikeda | May 2017 | A1 |
20170184542 | Chatelier et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170234825 | Elibol et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170240962 | Merriman | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170288017 | Majima et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170332918 | Keane | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180014786 | Keane | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180031508 | Jin | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180031509 | Jin | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180045665 | Jin | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180259474 | Jin | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180297321 | Jin et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180305727 | Merriman | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180340220 | Merriman | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190004003 | Merriman | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190033244 | Jin | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190039065 | Choi | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190041355 | Merriman | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190041378 | Choi | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190094175 | Merriman | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190194801 | Jin et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190355442 | Merriman et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190376925 | Choi et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190383770 | Choi et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200157595 | Merriman et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200217813 | Merriman et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200242482 | Merriman et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200277645 | Merriman et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1795376 | Jun 2006 | CN |
101231287 | Jul 2008 | CN |
102706940 | Oct 2012 | CN |
104685066 | Jun 2015 | CN |
104703700 | Jun 2015 | CN |
108027335 | May 2018 | CN |
102012008375 | Oct 2012 | DE |
102013012145 | Jan 2015 | DE |
2053383 | Apr 2009 | EP |
3403079 | Nov 2018 | EP |
3408219 | Dec 2018 | EP |
3408220 | Dec 2018 | EP |
3414784 | Dec 2018 | EP |
3420580 | Jan 2019 | EP |
2485559 | May 2012 | GB |
0233981 | Jul 1990 | JP |
2018-522236 | Aug 2018 | JP |
20070059880 | Jun 2007 | KR |
20110104245 | Sep 2011 | KR |
2002049980 | Jun 2002 | WO |
2002074985 | Sep 2002 | WO |
2003042396 | May 2003 | WO |
2004096986 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004099307 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005108612 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2007054649 | May 2007 | WO |
2007102960 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007126432 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007128965 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2009003208 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009035647 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2010022107 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2012083249 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012087352 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012152056 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013096851 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2014182630 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2015167019 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015176990 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015188197 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016016635 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2016100635 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016100637 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016196755 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2016210386 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2017041056 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2017042038 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2017061129 | Apr 2017 | WO |
2017123416 | Jul 2017 | WO |
2017132567 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2017132586 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2017139493 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2017147187 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2017151680 | Sep 2017 | WO |
2017184677 | Oct 2017 | WO |
2018022799 | Feb 2018 | WO |
2018026855 | Feb 2018 | WO |
2018098286 | May 2018 | WO |
2018132457 | Jul 2018 | WO |
2018136148 | Jul 2018 | WO |
2018200687 | Nov 2018 | WO |
2018208505 | Nov 2018 | WO |
2003091458 | Jan 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Paul et al., “Charge transfer through Single-Stranded Peptide Nucleic Acid Composed of Thymine Nucleotides,” J. Phy. Chem. C 2008, 112, 7233-7240 (Year: 2008). |
Hatcher et al., “PNA versus DNA: Effects of Structural Fluctuations on Electronic Structure and Hole-Transport Mechanisms,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 11752-1176 (Year: 2008). |
Venkatramani et al., “Nucleic Acid Charge Transfer: Black, White and Gray,” Coord Chem Rev. Apr. 1, 2011 I 255(7-8): 635-648 (Year: 2011). |
Shin et al., “Distance Dependence of Electron Transfer Across Peptides with Different Secondary Structures: The Role of Peptide energetics and Electronic Coupling,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3722-3732 (Year: 2003). |
Long et al., “Peptide Electon transfer: More Questions than Answers,” Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 5186-5194 (Year: 2005). |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 22, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/639,716. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 2, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/073,693. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/731,749. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 9, 2020 in Application No. PCT/US2020/13218. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 6, 2020 in Application No. PCT/US2020/25068. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 4, 2020 in Application No. PCT/US2020/28004. |
EP; European Search Report dated Sep. 30, 2020 in Application No. 17893481.6. |
JP; Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2020 in Japanese Application No. 2017-566864. |
CN; Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2020 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201680083636.4. |
Yang et al., “Two-Dimensional Graphene Nanoribbons,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. vol. 130, Issue 13 (2008). |
USPTO; Requirement for Restriction dated Nov. 2, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/667,583. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/667,583. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/667,583. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/667,583. |
USPTO; Requirement for Restriction dated Dec. 1, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/996,477. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated May 5, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/996,477. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Oct. 4, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/996,477. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 3, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/996,477. |
USPTO; Final Office Action date Dec. 30, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/050,270. |
USPTO; Advisory Action dated Mar. 14, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/050,270. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/050,270. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/050,270. |
USPTO; Advisory Action dated Sep. 26, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/050,270. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/050,270. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/050,270. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 6, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/050,270. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/220,307. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 28, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/220,307. |
USPTO; Requirement for Restriction dated Jan. 17, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/336,557. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated May 16, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/336,557. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/336,557. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated May 25, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/336,557. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,400. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,400. |
USPTO; Advisory Action dated Oct. 12, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,400. |
USPTO; Advisory Action dated Nov. 14, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,400. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 6, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,400. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,412. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 12, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,412. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,412. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/796,080. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/796,080. |
USPTO; Advisory Action dated Sep. 4, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/796,080. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 11, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/796,080. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/944,356. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 4, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/979,135. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/979,135. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/979,135. |
USPTO; Advisory Action dated May 22, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/979,135. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 25, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/979,135. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 11, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/979,135. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2019 in the U.S. Appl. No. 16/011,065. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/011,065. |
USPTO; Requirement for Restriction dated Oct. 15, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,028. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,028. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,028. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2019 in the U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,028. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 8, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,028. |
USPTO; Requirement for Restriction dated Dec. 17, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,049. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,049. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,049. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,049. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 20, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/015,049. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/070,133. |
USPTO; Restriction Requirement dated Sep. 19, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/073,706. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 24, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/073,706. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/076,673. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/152,190. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated May 30, 2019, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/152,190. |
USPTO; Restriction Requirement dated May 29, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/250,929. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 23, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/250,929. |
USPTO; Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 8, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/479,257. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 29, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/001995. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 13, 2018 in Application No. PCT/US2018/013140. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 27, 2017 in Application No. PCT/US2017/015437. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 27, 2017 in Application No. PCT/US2017/015465. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 26, 2017 in Application No. PCT/US2017/017231. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 25, 2017 in Application No. PCT/US2017/018950. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 20, 2018 in Application No. PCT/US2018/029382. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 20 ,2018 in Application No. PCT/US2018/029393. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 27, 2016 in Application No. PCT/US2016/039446. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 22, 2017 in Application No. PCT/US2017/044023. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 26, 2017 in Application No. PCT/US2017/044965. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion received Nov. 9, 2018 in Application No. PCT/US2018/048873. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 8, 2010 in Application No. PCT/US2009/054235. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 18, 2019 in Application No. PCT/US2018/055264. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 12, 2018 in Application No. PCT/US2017/063025. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 7, 2018 in Application No. PCT/US2017/063105. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 18. 2017 in Application No. PCT/US2016/068922. |
CN; Notice of the First Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2019 in Chinese Application No. 201680049272.8. |
CN; Notice of the First Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2019 in Chinese Application No. 201780020478.2. |
EP; European Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2019 in Application No. 16815467.2. |
EP; European Search Report dated Aug. 2, 2019 in Application No. 16885434.7. |
EP; European Search Report dated Jan. 29, 2020 in Application No. 17745013.7. |
EP; European Search Report dated Aug. 2, 2019 in Application No. 17745026.9. |
EP; European Search Report dated Jan. 29, 2020 in Application No. 17750776.1. |
EP; European Search Report dated Oct. 24, 2019 in Application No. 17757146.0. |
EP; European Search Report dated Mar. 6, 2020 in Application No. 17835231.6. |
EP; European Search Report dated Feb. 7, 2020 in Application No. 17837566.3. |
Ahn et al., “Electrical Immunosensor Based on a Submicron-Gap Interdigitated Electrode and Gold Enhancement,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 26, pp. 4690-4696, (2011). |
Alayo et al., “Gold Interdigitated Nanoelectrodes as a Sensitive Analytical Tool for Selective Detection of Electroactive Species via Redox Cycling,” Microchim Acta, vol. 183, pp. 1633-1639, (2016). |
Antibody Structure Downloaded from https://absoluteantibody.com/antibody-resources/antibody-overview/antibody-structure/ (Mar. 1, 2019). |
Bai et al., “Review: Gas Sensors Based on Conducting Polymers,” Sensors, vol. 7, pp. 267-307, (2007). |
Bailey et al., “DNA-Encoded Antibody Libraries: a Unified Platform for Multiplexed Cell Sorting and Detection of Genes and Proteins,” Journal of American Chemical Society, vol. 129, pp. 1959-1967, (2007). |
Bechelany et al. “Synthesis Mechanisms of Organized Nanoparticles: Influence of Annealing Temperature and Atmosphere,” Crystal Growth and Design, vol. 10, pp. 587-596 (Oct. 21, 2010). |
Berdat et al., “Label-Free Detection of DNA with Interdigitated Micro-Electrodes in a Fluidic Cell,” Lab on a Chip, vol. 8, pp. 302-308, (2008). |
Bhura, “3D Interdigitated Electrode Array (IDEA) Biosensor for Detection of Serum Biomarker,” Master Thesis, Portland State University, 68 Pages, (2011). |
Blossey, R., “Self-Cleaning Surfaces-Virtual Realities,” Nature Materials, vol. 2(5), pp. 301-306, (May 2006). |
Bonilla et al., “Electrical Readout of Protein Microarrays on Regular Glass Slides,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 83, pp. 1726-1731, (2011). |
Botsialas et al., “A Miniaturized Chemocapacitor System for the Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds,” Sensors and Actuators B, Chemical, vol. 177, pp. 776-784, (2013). |
Branagan et al “Enhanced Mass Transport of Electroactive Species to Annular Nanoband Electrodes Embedded in Nanocapillary Array Membranes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 134, pp. 8617-8624, (2012). |
Braun et al., “DNA-Templated Assembly and Electrode Attachment of a Conducting Silver Wire,” Letters to Nature, vol. 391(6669), pp. 775-778, (Feb. 1998). |
Briglin et al., “Exploitation of Spatiotemporal Information and Geometric Optimization of Signal/Noise Performance Using Arrays of Carbon Black-Polymer Composite Vapor Detectors,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 82, pp. 54-74, (2002). |
Cassie, A.B.D. et al., “Wettability of Porous Surfaces,” Transitions of the Faraday Society, vol. 40, pp. 546-551, (Jan. 1944) (Abstract Only). |
Cerofolini et al., “A Hybrid Approach to Nanoelectronics: A Hybrid Approach to Nanoelectrics,” Nanotechnology, Institute of Physics Publishing, GB, vol. 16, No. 8, pp. 1040-1047 (2005). |
Chen, X. et al., “Electrical Nanogap Devices for Biosensing,” Materials Today, vol. 13, pp. 28-41, (Nov. 2010). |
Chen et al., “Electrochemical Approach for Fabricating Nanogap Electrodes with Well Controllable Separation,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 86, pp. 123105.1-123105.3, (2005). |
Chen et al., “Fabrication of Submicron-Gap Electrodes by Silicon Volume Expansion for DNA-Detection,” Sensors and Actuators A, vol. 175, pp. 73-77, (2012). |
Choi, J. E. et al., “Fabrication of Microchannel with 60 Electrodes and Resistance Measurement,” Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, vol. 21, pp. 178-183, (Sep. 2010) (Abstract Only). |
Choi Y.S. et al., “Hybridization by an Electroatomical Genome on Detection on Using an Indicator-Free DNA on a Microelectrode-Array DNA Chip,” Bulletin of the Korean Chemistry Society, vol. 26, pp. 379-383, (2005). |
Choi, C. et al., “Strongly Superhydrophobic Silicon Nanowires by Supercritical CO2 Drying,” Electronic Materials Letters, vol. 6 (2), pp. 59-64, (Jun. 2010). |
Church et al., “Next-Generation Digital Information Storage in DNA,” Science, vol. 337(6102), p. 6102, (Sep. 28, 2012). |
Cosofret et al., “Microfabricated Sensor Arrays Sensitive to pH and K+ for Ionic Distribution Measurements in the Beating Heart,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 67, pp. 1647-1653, (1995). |
Coulson S.R. et al., “Super-Repellent Composite Fluoropolymer Surfaces,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B., vol. 104(37), pp. 8836-8840, (Aug. 2000). |
Dickey et al., “Electrically Addressable Parallel Nanowires with 30 NM Spacing from Micromolding and Nanoskiving,” Nano Letters, vol. 8(12), pp. 4568-4573, (2008). |
Fan et al., “Detection of MicroRNAs Using Target-Guided Formation of Conducting Polymer Nanowires in Nanogaps,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 129, pp. 5437-5443, (2007). |
Fink et al. “Electrical Conduction Through DNA Molecules,” Nature, vol. 398, pp. 407-410 (Jan. 20, 1999). |
Fuller et al., “Real-Time Single-Molecule Electronic DNA Sequencing by Synthesis Using Polymer-Tagged Nucleotides on a Nanopore Array,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 113(19), pp. 5233-523, (May 10, 2016). |
Gapin, A.I. et al., “CoPt Patterned Media in Anodized Aluminum Oxide Templates,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 99(8), pp. 08G902 (1-3), (Apr. 2006). |
Ghindilis, A. et al., “Real Time Biosensor Platforms Fully Integrated Device for Impedimetric Assays,” ECS Transactions, vol. 33, pp. 59-68, (2010). |
Guo et al., “Conductivity of a single DNA duplex bridging a carbon nanotube gap,” Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 1-12 (2008). |
Han, “Energy Band Gap Engineering of Graphene Nanoribbons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 98, pp. 1-7, (May 16, 2007). |
Han et al., “Redox Cycling in Nanopore-Confined Recessed Dual-Ring Electrode Arrays,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 120, pp. 20634-20641, (2016). |
Hanief, Topic, Pineda-Vargas, “Solid State Dewetting of Continuous Thin Platinum Coatings,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, vol. 363, pp. 173-176, (2015). |
Hashioka et al., “Deoxyribonucleic Acid Sensing Device with 40-NM-Gap-Electrodes Fabricated by Low-Cost Conventional Techniques,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 85(4), p. 687-688, (Jul. 2004). |
He et al., “Electromechanical Fabrication of Atomically Thin Metallic Wires and Electrodes Separated with Molecular-Scale Gaps,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 522, pp. 167-172, (Jan. 2002). |
Heerema et al., “Graphene Nanodevices for DNA Sequencing,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 11, pp. 127-136, (Feb. 3, 2016). |
Henry et al., “Microcavities Containing Individually Addressable Recessed Microdisk and Tubular Nanoband Electrodes,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 146(9), pp. 3367-3373, (1999). |
Hwang et al., “Electrical Transport Through 60 Base Pairs of Poly (dG)-Poly (dC) DNA Molecules,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 81(6), p. 1134-1136, (Aug. 2002). |
Ino et al., “Addressable Electrode Array Device with IDA Electrodes for High-Throughput Detection,” Lab on a Chip, vol. 11, p. 385-388, (2011). |
Ino et al., “Local Redox-Cycling-Based Electrochemical Chip Device with Seep Microwells for Evaluation of Embryoid Bodies,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 51, pp. 6648-6652, (2012). |
Iqbal et al., “Direct Current Electrical Characterization of ds-DNA in Nanogap Junctions,” Applied Physics Letter, vol. 86, p. 153901-1-153901-3, (Apr. 2005). |
Javey et al., “Layer-By-Layer Assembly of Nanowires for Three-Dimensional, Multifunctional Electronics,” Nano Letters, vol. 7, pp. 773-777, (2007). |
Khawli et al., “Charge Variants in IgG1-Isolation, Characterization, In Vitro Binding Properties and Pharmacokinetics in Rats,” Landes Bioscience, vol. 2(6), pp. 613-623, (2010). |
Kim, J. Y. et al., “Optically Transparent Glass with Vertically Aligned Surface Al203 Nanowires Having Superhydrophobic Characteristics,” NANO: Brief Reports and Reviews, vol. 5(2), pp. 89-95, (Apr. 2010) (Abstract Only). |
Kim et al., “Rapid Fabrication of Uniformly Sized Nanopores and Nanopore Arrays for Parallel DNA Analysis,” Advances Materials, vol. 18, pp. 3149-3153, (Dec. 4, 2006). |
Kitsara et al., “Single Chip Interdigitated Electrode Capacitive Chemical Sensor Arrays,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 127, pp. 186-192, (2007). |
Kitsara et al., “Small-Volume Multiparametric Electrochemical Detection at Low Cost Polymeric Devices Featuring Nanoelectrodes,” SPIE, vol. 9518, 9 Pages, (2015). |
Kraft, “Doped Diamond: A Compact Review on a New, Versatile Electrode Material,” International Journal of Electrochemistry, vol. 2, pp. 355-385, (May 2007). |
Kumar et al., “Terminal Phosphate Labeled Nucleotides: Synthesis, Applications and Linker Effect on Incorporation by DNA Polymerases,” Nucleosides, Nucleotides and Nucleic Acids, Taylor and Francis, vol. 24, No. 5-7, pp. 401-408 (2005). |
Lee, K. H. et al., “One-Chip Electronic Detection of DNA Hybridization using Precision Impedance-Based CMOS Array Sensor,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 26, pp. 1373-1379, (Dec. 15, 2010). |
Lin et al., “An Addressable Microelectrode Array for Electrichemical Detection,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 80, pp. 6830-6833, (2008). |
Liu et al., “Atomically Thin Molybdenum Disulfide Nanopores with High Sensitivity for DNA Translocation,” ACS Nano, vol. 8, pp. 2504-2511, (Feb. 18, 2014). |
Liu et al., “An Enzyme-Based E-DNA Sensor for Sequence-Specific Detection of Femtomolar DNA Targets,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 130(21), pp. 6820-6825, (2008). |
Liu et al., “Controllable Nanogap Fabrication on Microchip by Chronopotentiometry,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 50, pp. 3041-3047, (2005). |
MacNaughton et al., “High-Throughput Heterogeneous Integration of Diverse Nanomaterials on a Single Chip for Sensing Applications,” PLOS One, vol. 9(10), e111377, 7 Pages, (2014). |
Mastrototaro et al., “Thin-Film Flexible Multielectrode Arrays for Voltage Measurements in the Heart,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society 11th Annual International Conference, 1 Page, (1989). |
Mastrototaro et al., “Rigid and Flexible Thin-Film Multielectrode Arrays for Transmural Cardiac Recording,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 39, pp. 217-279, (1992). |
Mirando-Castro et al., “Hairpin-DNA Probe for Enzyme-Amplified Electrochemical Detection of Legionella pnuemophila,” Anal. Chem., vol. 79, pp. 4050-4055, (Jun. 1, 2007). |
Nishida, et al. “Self-Oriented Immobilization of DNA Polymerase Tagged by Titanium-Binding Peptide Motif,” Langmuir, vol. 31, pp. 732-740 (Dec. 17, 2014). |
Niwa, O. et al., “Fabrication and Characteristics of Vertically Separated Interdigitated Array Electrodes,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry, vol. 267 pp. 291-297, (Aug. 10, 1989) (Abstract Only). |
Okinaka et al., ““Polymer” Inclusions in Cobalt-Hardened Electroplated Gold,” Journal the of Electrochemical Society, vol. 125, p. 1745, (1978). (Abstract Only). |
Park, S.J. et al., “Array-Based Electrical Detection of DNA with Nanoparticle Probes,” Science, vol. 295, pp. 1503-1506, (Feb. 22, 2002). |
Park, C.W. et al., “Fabrication of Poly-Si/ AU Nano-Gaps Using Atomic-Layer-Deposited AI2O3 as a Sacrificial Layer,” Nanotechnology, vol. 16, pp. 361-364, (Feb. 1, 2005) (Abstract Only). |
Parkin, I. P. et al., “Self-Cleaning Coatings,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 15(17), pp. 1689-1695, (Dec. 2004). |
Prins et al., “Room-Temperature Gating of Molecular Junctions Using Few-Layer Graphene Nanogap Electrodes,” Nano Letters, vol. 11, pp. 4607-4611, (Oct. 21, 2011). |
Pugliese et al., “Processive Inforporation of Deoxynucleoside Triphosphate Analogs by Single-Molecule DNA Polymerase I (Klenow Fragment) Nanocircuits,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 137, No. 30, pp. 9587-9594 (2015). |
Qing et al., “Finely Tuning Metallic Nanogap Size with Electrodeposition by Utilizing High-Frequency Impedance in Feedback,” Angewandte Chemie Int ed, vol. 44, pp. 7771-7775, (2005). |
Reed et al., “Conductance of a Molecular Junction Reports,” Science, vol. 278, pp. 252-254, (Oct. 1997). |
Reichert et al., “Driving Current Through Single Organic Molecules,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 88(17), pp. 176804-1-176804-4, (Apr. 2002). |
Roppert et al., “A New Approach for an Interdigitated Electrodes DNA-Sensor,” XVIIIth International Symposium on Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, Bioelectrochemistry, p. 143, (2005). |
Roy, S. et al., “Mass-Produced Nanogap Sensor Arrays for Ultra-Sensitive Detection of DNA,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 131, pp. 12211-12217, (Aug. 5, 2009) (Abstract Only). |
Ruttkowski, E. et al., “CMOS based Arrays of Nanogaps Devices for Molecular Devices,” Proceedings of 2005 5th IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology, vol. 1, pp. 438-441, (Jul. 2005) (Abstract Only). |
Sanguino et al., “Interdigitated Capacitive Immunosensors with PVDF Immobilization Layers,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 14(4), pp. 1260-1265, (Apr. 2014). |
Santschi et al., “Interdigitated 50nm Ti Electrode Arrays Fabricated using XeF2 Enhanced Focused Ion Beam Etching,” Nanotechnology, vol. 17, pp. 2722-2729, (2006). |
Schaefer et al., “Stability and Dewetting Kinetics of Thin Gold Films on Ti, TiOx, and ZnO Adhesion Layers,” Acta Materialia, vol. 61, pp. 7841-7848, (2013). |
Schrott, W. et al., “Metal Electrodes in Plastic Microfluidic Systems,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 86, pp. 1340-1342, (Jun. 2009). |
Shimanovsky et al., “Hiding Data in DNA,” International Workshop on Information Hiding, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 373-386, (Dec. 18, 2012). |
Shimoda, T. et al., “Solution-Processed Silicon Films and Transistors,” Nature, vol. 440(7085), pp. 783-786, (Apr. 2006). |
Sholders et al., “Distinct Conformations of a Putative Translocation Element in Poliovirus Polymerase,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 426(7), pp. 1407-1419, (Apr. 3, 2014). |
Singh et al., “3D Nanogap Interdigitated Electrode Array Biosensors,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 397, pp. 1493-1502, (2010). |
Singh et al., “Evaluation of Nanomaterials-Biomolecule Hybrids for Signals Enhancement of Impedimetric Biosensors,” 11th IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology, pp. 707-710, (2011) . |
Singh et al., “Nanoparticle-Enhanced Sensitivity of a Nanogap-Interdigitated Electrode Array Impedimetric Biosensor,” Langmuir, vol. 27, pp. 13931-13939, (2011). |
Stagni, C. et al., “CMOS DNA Sensor Array with Integrated A/D Conversation Based on Label-Free Capacitance Measurement,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 41, pp. 2956-2964, (Nov. 20, 2006). |
Stenning, “The Investigation of Grain Boundary Development and Crystal Synthesis of Thin Gold Films on Silicon Wafers,” http://www.ucl.ac.uk/˜ucapikr/projects, (Mar. 31, 2009). |
Su, Y., “Modeling and Characteristic Study of Thin Film Based Biosensor Based on COMSOL,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Article 581063 (6 Pages), (Apr. 7, 2014). |
Thompson, “Solid-State Dewetting of Thin Films,” Department of Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 42, pp. 399-434, (2012). |
Urban, M. et al., “A Paralleled Readout System for an Electrical DNA-Hybridization Assay Based on a Microstructured Electrode Array,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 74, pp. 1077-1081, (Jan. 2003) (Abstract Only). |
Van Gerwin et al., “Nanoscaled Interdigitated Electrode Arrays for Biochemical Sensors,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 49, pp. 73-80, (1998). |
Van Megan et al., “Submicron Electrode Gaps Fabricated by Gold Electrodeposition at Interdigitated Electrodes,” Key Engineering Materials, vol. 605, pp. 107-110, (2014). |
Wang et al., “Electronics and Optoelectronics of Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 7, pp. 699-712, (Nov. 6, 2012). |
Xu et al., “Fabrication of Complex Metallic Nanostructures by Nanoskiving,” American Chemical Society Nano, vol. 1(3), pp. 215-227, (2007). |
Zafarani et al., “Electrochemical Redox Cycling in a New Nanogap Sensor: Design and Simulation,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 760, pp. 42-47, (2015). |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated May 11, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/073,706. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 1, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/076,673. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/684,338. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/878,484. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/479,257. |
USPTo; Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/477,106. |
EP; European Search Report dated Jun. 18, 2020 in Application No. 16815467.2. |
CN; Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2020 in Chinese Patent Application No. 2017800204782. |
EP; European Search Report dated Jun. 26, 2020 in Application No. 17874229.2. |
Li et al., “Graphene Channel Liquid Container Field Effect Transistor as pH Sensor,” Hindawi Publishing Corp., Journal of Nanomaterials 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210048405 A1 | Feb 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62503812 | May 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16015049 | Jun 2018 | US |
Child | 16831722 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2018/029393 | Apr 2018 | US |
Child | 16015049 | US |