1. Field of the Invention
The invention pertains to the structure, fabrication of a microfluidic device and methods for conducting analysis in microfluidic devices.
2. Background of the Art Related to the Invention
Analysis utilizing specific binding pairs such as antigen/antibody; complementary DNA/DNA; DNA/RNA; RNA/RNA; biotin/avidin containing pairs are widely known in the art. Techniques for manufacturing and utilizing microfluidic devices are also well known. The art also discloses various techniques for DNA sequencing based on complementary binding of DNA.
DNA probe array technology, which utilizes binding of target single standed DNA onto immobilized DNA probes has wide applications. A large amount of research and development activities have been carried out with different technology emphasis. For example, same technologies are focused on probe placement by mechanical means. Other technologies are focused on in-situ probe synthesis that is advantageous in producing large arrays. Additionally, other technologies are focused on gel pad arrays using photopolymerizaion and piezoelectric liquid dispensing technologies.
A common challenge to all DNA hybridization technologies is the lack of control of stringency for each individual probe site. The DNA hybridization process occurs at specific temperature and salinity conditions and varies with DNA sequences. For DNA probe arrays, since the DNA probe sequences are different, hybridization recognition is never perfect under a uniform stringency condition for the entire probe array. The problem is most obvious for short duplexes which often results in single base mismatches. One can minimize the effect of mismatched hybridization by using large probe site redundancy. Stringency control has been provided for each probe site by controlling the electrophoretic movement of oligonucleotides. To successfully implement this later scheme, a meticulously engineered permeation layer is required to prevent DNA molecules or labeling agents being damaged by direct electrolysis or by the product of the electolysis.
In addition, the current DNA array technologies have failed to provide an effective solution to maximize hybridization efficiency. For diagnostic assays, the target DNA molecules are often of minute quantities. The detection limit of the assay is determined by the sensitivity of the detection device, and also by the amount of target oligos bound to the probes during the course of hybridization. In a stationary hybridization chamber where active mixing is absent, the probability of a given target molecule hybridizes to its complementary strand on the surface is determined by diffusion rate and statistics. It takes up to tens of hours for hybridization to complete at low target concentration levels. To better utilize the target molecules and enhance the hybridization, flow through technology has been proposed where the probe arrays are placed perpendicular to the fluidic flow direction. Even with flow through technology, only a portion of the target molecules can come in contact with any specific DNA probe site.
The present invention overcomes the above technical issues by sequentially placing the DNA probe sites in microfluidic channels such that the DNA probe can efficiently contact its binding partner.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,147,607 describes a variety of microassay devices which have microchannels in plastic materials with a reagent such as an antibody or DNA immobilized on the channel at different locations. Techniques for binding antibodies to the microchannel wall are described but techniques for binding DNA are not described. The binding of probes to the microchannel wall does not provide for optimum contact of probe and test sample. U.S. Pat. No. 5,843,767 describes microfabricated flowthrough porous apparatus for discrete detection of binding reactions such as DNA/DNA. WO/98/43739 describes porous flow channels having reagents immobilized in the chamber.
The invention comprises microfluidic devices comprising a section of solid material such as a chip with a microchannel with an inlet and exit port for flowing fluids through the channels. The microchannel has separated defined regions of specific binding pair member immobilized on porous polymer, microstructures molded in the microchannels or packed beads. These structures provide for optimum contact of the immobilized binding pair member and a binding pair member in fluid flowing through the mirochannel. The porous polymer beads or microstructure must provide for flow and not obstruct the channel. The microchannel is operatively associated with a detector and a fluid propeling component to flow liquids in the channel and may also have electrodes at the exit and entrance ports.
DNA/DNA; DNA/RNA, and RNA/RNA complementary binding pair are preferred. The microchannel is operatively associated with target DNA labeled with a fluorophore, an excitation source and a detector to detect emitted fluorescence from the binding pairs. It is an object of the invention to provide a method for DNA or RNA sequencing by providing the above identified chip with DNA or RNA probes immobilized in the separated defined region to bind fluorescently labeled target DNA.
It is also an object of the present invention to provide a means determining genetic defects. The invention also provides a means for identifying pathogens through DNA analysis.
The microchannels may have a variety of configurations, feedback arms, valves, and vents to control fluid flow. There may be single or multiple channels. The invention provides for efficient contact between immobilized binding substances and binding partners in the fluid flowing through the channel. The invention provides for improved hybridization stringency control by flow modulation; shortened assay time by increasing the rate of hybridization with flow induced agitation and by bringing the target and probe into proximity within the microfluidic channel; and increased hybridization efficiency which improves sensitivity. In addition there is no interference through hydrolysis.
The chips microfluidic channels of the present invention are channels generally less than 200 microns in plastic with molding or embossing technology. The channels need to be of the dimension to support pumping of the microfluidic system The microfluidic channel may have any shape, for example, it may be linear, serpentine, arc shaped and the like. The cross-sectional dimension of the channel may be square, rectagular, semicircular, etc. There may be multiple and interconnected microchannels with valves to provide for recirculation.
The section of solid material maybe chips made of glass, ceramic, metal, silicon or plastic. Chips are preferably fabricated from plastics such as expoxy resin, polyacrylic resins, polyester resins, polystyrene, polycarbonate, polyvinyl chloride and the like. Specific binding pairs are DNA/DNA or DNA/RNA complementary binding pairs.
Fluid propelling components such as pressurized gas, vacuum, electric field, magnetic field and cetrifugal force devices are operatively associated with the microchannel to move fluid through the microchannel. In addition, charged test samples may be altered by modulating the electric field against or in the direction of the flow or perpendicular to the flow. Thus, the rate of fluid flow in the microchannel can be altered to promote binding of binding pairs, for example, hybridization of DNA/DNA or DNA/RNA pairs. Also, operatively associated with the microchannel is a detector such as an optical, electrical or electrochemical detector.
Microfabricated plastic capillary electrophoresis (CE) devices have been demonstrated in the art. Thermoplastic molded polymethylmethacrylate CE devices are described by R. M. McCormick, et al, “Microchannel electrophoretic separations of DNA in injection-molded plastic substrates,” Anal. Chem., vol. 69, pp. 2626, 1997. Eckstrom et al. investigated elastomeric polymers such as PDMS, “PCT Appl. WO91/16966, ” 1991. More recently, others have published electrophoretic separation of DNA ladders in PDMS devices, for example, C. S. Effenhauser, et al, “Integrated Capillary Electrophoresis on Flexible Silicone Microdevices,” Anal Chem., vol. 69, pp. 3451, 1997. Mastrangelo, et al describes building micro CE devices based on parylene-polycarbonate substrates using a surface micromachining approach, “An Inexpensive Plastic Technology for Microfabricated Capillary Electroophoresis Chip” presented at Micro-TAS'98, Banff, 1998.Thus, techniques are available for fabricating microchannels. The invention involves fixing specific binding substances by way of porous polymer, beads or structure in the microchannel to more efficiently promote binding.
These examples are intended to illustrate the present invention and not to limit it in spirit or scope.
This application is, a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 09/438,600, filed Nov. 12, 1999, now U.S. Patent No. 6,361,958, issued Mar. 26, 2002, and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4415732 | Caruthers et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4683195 | Mullis et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4713347 | Mitchell et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4755458 | Rabbani et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4840893 | Hill et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4920047 | Giaever et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5015569 | Pontius | May 1991 | A |
5064618 | Baker et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5066372 | Weetall | Nov 1991 | A |
5071531 | Soane | Dec 1991 | A |
5126022 | Soane et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5130238 | Malek et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5135627 | Soane | Aug 1992 | A |
5147607 | Mochida | Sep 1992 | A |
5192507 | Taylor et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5296375 | Kricka et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5304487 | Wilding et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5455166 | Walker | Oct 1995 | A |
5486335 | Wilding et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5494810 | Barany et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5498392 | Wilding et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5505321 | Caron et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5519635 | Miyake et al. | May 1996 | A |
5552270 | Khrapko et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5569364 | Hooper et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5585069 | Zanzucchi et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587128 | Wilding et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591578 | Meade et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5593838 | Zanzucchi et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5595908 | Fawcett et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5603351 | Cherukuri et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5605662 | Heller et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5620850 | Bamdad et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5631337 | Sassi et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632876 | Zanzucchi et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632957 | Heller et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635358 | Wilding et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5637469 | Wilding et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5643738 | Zanzucchi et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5653939 | Hollis et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5681484 | Zanzucchi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5694932 | Michel | Dec 1997 | A |
5705346 | Okamoto et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5705348 | Meade et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5716825 | Hancock et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5726026 | Wilding et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727548 | Hill et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728532 | Ackley | Mar 1998 | A |
5741462 | Nova et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5747169 | Fan et al. | May 1998 | A |
5750015 | Soane et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755942 | Zanzucchi et al. | May 1998 | A |
5756050 | Ershow et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759866 | Machida et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770029 | Nelson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770369 | Meade et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5780235 | Bandman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5824473 | Meade et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5837859 | Teoule et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843767 | Beattie | Dec 1998 | A |
5849486 | Heller et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5863502 | Southgate et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5866345 | Wilding et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5942443 | Parce et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5952172 | Meade et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5976802 | Ansorge et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6013170 | Meade | Jan 2000 | A |
6013459 | Meade | Jan 2000 | A |
6063573 | Kayyem | May 2000 | A |
6063589 | Kellogg et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071699 | Meade et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6087100 | Meade et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090933 | Kayyem et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096825 | Garnier | Aug 2000 | A |
6100045 | Van Es | Aug 2000 | A |
6100099 | Gordon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114122 | Besemer et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6150119 | Kopf-Sill et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6150180 | Parce et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6177250 | Meade et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6180352 | Meade et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6197515 | Bamdad et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6197595 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200761 | Meade et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203758 | Marks et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207369 | Wohlstadter et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221583 | Kayyem et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221677 | Wu et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6232062 | Kayyem et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238870 | Meade et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6258545 | Meade et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258593 | Schembri et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264825 | Blackburn et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265155 | Meade et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268149 | Meade et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268150 | Meade et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277576 | Meade et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6290839 | Kayyem et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291188 | Meade et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6300141 | Segal et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306584 | Bamdad | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306590 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322979 | Bamdad et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326211 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6361958 | Shieh et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368871 | Christel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6432723 | Plaxco et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6472148 | Bamdad et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6479240 | Kayyem et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6495323 | Kayyem et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6541617 | Bamdad et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6572830 | Burdon et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6592696 | Burdon et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600026 | Yu | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6623945 | Nair et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
20020006643 | Kayyem et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020009810 | O'Connor et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020177135 | Doung et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030087228 | Bamdad et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 527 905 | Aug 1991 | EP |
0 637 998 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0 478 319 | Apr 1997 | EP |
0 637 996 | Jul 1997 | EP |
0 969 083 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1 183 102 | Mar 2002 | EP |
WO 8605815 | Oct 1986 | WO |
WO 9322053 | Nov 1993 | WO |
WO 9615576 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 8615450 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9639260 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9693252 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9716561 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9716835 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9727324 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9727329 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9731256 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9731256 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9737755 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9743629 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9804740 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9805424 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9812539 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9843739 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9813683 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9832018 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9849344 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9851823 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9929711 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9933559 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 9937819 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 9937819 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 9967425 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 9967425 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0062931 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0106016 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0106016 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0135100 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0154813 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0154813 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0243864 | Jun 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020094584 A1 | Jul 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09438600 | Nov 1999 | US |
Child | 10028277 | US |