BIODEGRADABLE POLYMERIC NANOCOMPOSITE MATERIALS AND APPLICATIONS OF THE SAME

Abstract

A method for producing a polymer film includes: obtaining a load graph representing a functional relationship between a weight percentage of tissue forming nanoparticles in a polymer film and a maximum load of that polymer film; obtaining a stress graph representing a functional relationship between the weight percentage of tissue forming nanoparticles in a polymer film and maximum stress of that polymer film; determining a first weight percentage corresponding to a peak of the load graph and determining a second weight percentage corresponding to a peak of the stress graph; determining an optimal weight percentage based on the first and second weight percentage values; and producing a polymer film having tissue forming nanoparticles at the optimal weight percentage.

Description

FIELD

The present disclosure relates generally to a biocompatible structure for bone and tissue regeneration, and more particularly to a biodegradable and bioresorbable nanocomposite incorporating polymer, nanostructured hydroxyapatite and optionally other beneficial factors.

BACKGROUND

The background description provided herein is for the purpose of generally presenting the context of the disclosure. Work of the presently named inventors, to the extent it is described in this background section, as well as aspects of the description that may not otherwise qualify as prior art at the time of filing, are neither expressly nor impliedly admitted as prior art against the present disclosure.

Skeletal deficiencies from trauma, tumors and bone diseases, or abnormal development frequently require surgical procedures to attempt to restore normal bone function. Although most of these treatments are successful, they all have problems and limitations.

Therefore, a heretofore unaddressed need exists in the art to address the aforementioned deficiencies and inadequacies.

SUMMARY

Certain aspects of the present disclosure are directed to method to produce a polymer film.

In certain embodiments, the method includes: (1) obtaining a load graph representing a functional relationship between a weight percentage of tissue forming nanoparticles in a polymer film and a maximum load of that polymer film; (2) obtaining a stress graph representing a functional relationship between the weight percentage of tissue forming nanoparticles in a polymer film and maximum stress of that polymer film; (3) determining a first weight percentage corresponding to a peak of the load graph and determining a second weight percentage corresponding to a peak of the stress graph; (4) determining an optimal weight percentage based on the first and second weight percentage values; and (5) producing a biocompatible polymer film having tissue forming nanoparticles at the optimal weight percentage.

In certain embodiments, the load graph has a first peak and a second peak. A weight percentage corresponding to the second peak is larger than a weight percentage corresponding to the first peak. The first weight percentage is the weight percentage corresponding to the second peak.

In certain embodiments, the stress graph has a first peak and a second peak. A weight percentage corresponding to the second peak is larger than a weight percentage corresponding to the first peak. The second weight percentage is the weight percentage corresponding to the second peak.

In certain embodiments, the method further includes determining an upper limit value and a lower limit value of the optimal weight percentage. The upper limit value is a maximum weight percentage of the first weight percentage and the second weight percentage plus a first predetermined percentage. The lower limit value is a minimum weight percentage of the first weight percentage and the second weight percentage minus a second predetermined percentage.

In certain embodiments, each of the first and second predetermined percentages is about 90%, preferably about 5%, and more preferably about 0%.

In certain embodiments, the optimal weight percentage is an average of the first weight percentage and the second weight percentage plus/minus a third predetermined percentage.

In certain embodiments, the third predetermined percentages are about 90%, preferably about 5%, and more preferably about 0%.

In certain embodiments, the optimal weight percentage of the tissue forming nanoparticles in the polymer film is from 0% to 99.9%, preferably, from 0% to 30%, and more preferably about 20%.

In certain embodiments, the polymer includes at least one of a synthetic biodegradable polymer and a biodegradable polymer derived from natural source. The synthetic biodegradable polymer includes polyurethane, polylactide (PLA), polyglycolide (PGA), poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), poly(e-caprolactone), polydioxanone, polyanhydride, trimethylene carbonate, poly(β-hydroxybutyrate), poly(g-ethyl glutamate), poly(DTH iminocarbonate), poly(bisphenol A iminocarbonate), poly(ortho ester), polycyanoacrylate, polyphosphazene, or a mixture thereof. The biodegradable polymer derived from natural source comprises modified polysaccharides (cellulose, chitin, dextran), modified proteins (fibrin, casein), or a mixture thereof.

In certain embodiments, wherein the forming nanoparticles comprises nanoparticles of hydroxypatites, tricalcium phosphates, mixed calcium phosphates and calcium carbonate, bone particles of zenograft, allografts, autografts, alloplastic grafts, or a mixture thereof.

In another aspect, a method of forming a biocompatible structure includes: (1) dissolving a polymer in a solvent to form a first solution; (2) adding the tissue forming nanoparticles to the first solution to form a second solution; (3) applying the second solution to a surface to form a polymer film on the surface, wherein the tissue forming nanoparticles are dispersed in the polymer film; (4) dividing the polymer film into a plurality of strips; and (5) forming a layered biocompatible structure by the strips, the second solution, and second tissue forming particles, wherein the second tissue forming particles are placed between two of the strips. The polymer film has the optimal weight percentage of the tissue forming nanoparticles, and the optimal weight percentage is determined as described above in the present disclosure.

In certain embodiments, the method further includes stirring the first solution to uniformly distribute the polymer in the first solution, and sonicating the second solution to uniformly distribute the polymer and the tissue forming nanoparticles in the second solution.

In certain embodiments, the forming the biocompatible structure includes: (1) constructing a scaffold by stacking the strips to form polymer layers and adding the second tissue forming particles between the polymer layers; (2) applying the second solution to the scaffold to form a coated scaffold; and (3) adding the second tissue forming particles to the coated scaffold to form the biocompatible structure. The scaffold is formed by stacking the strips and layers of the bone particles alternatively.

In certain embodiments, the method further includes plasma treating the biocompatible structure.

In certain embodiments, the second tissue forming particles comprises nano-sized bone particles, micro-sized bone particles, or a mixture thereof.

In certain embodiments, the strip has a length of about 0.05-00 centimeter, a width of about 0.02-50 centimeter, and a thickness of about 0.01-500 millimeter, and the biocompatible structure is in a cylindrical shape or a spherical shape.

In certain embodiments, the method further includes adding a third tissue forming material to the biocompatible structure. The third tissue forming material includes a bioactive material, cells, or a mixture thereof. The bioactive material includes proteins, enzymes, growth factors, amino acids, bone morphogenic proteins, platelet derived growth factors, vascular endothelial growth factors, or a mixture thereof. The cells includes epithelial cells, neurons, glial cells, astrocytes, podocytes, mammary epithelial cells, islet cells, endothelial cells, mesenchymal cells, stem cells, osteoblast, muscle cells, striated muscle cells, fibroblasts, hepatocytes, ligament fibroblasts, tendon fibroblasts, chondrocytes, or a mixture thereof.

Certain aspects of the present disclosure are directed to a method for producing a polymer film. The method includes: (1) obtaining a first graph representing a functional relationship between a weight percentage of tissue forming nanoparticles in a polymer film and a first property of that polymer film; (2) obtaining a second graph representing a functional relationship between the weight percentage of tissue forming nanoparticles in a polymer film and a second property of that polymer film; (3) determining a first weight percentage corresponding to a peak of the first graph and determining a second weight percentage corresponding to a peak of the second graph; (4) determining an optimal weight percentage based on the first and second weight percentage values; and (5) producing a polymer film having tissue forming nanoparticles at the optimal weight percentage.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings illustrate one or more embodiments of the disclosure and, together with the written description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure. The same reference numbers may be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like elements in the embodiments.

FIG. 1A illustrates a biocompatible structure according to certain embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 1B illustrates a part of a biocompatible structure according to certain embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 2 schematically shows a Scanning Electron Microscopy image of a biocompatible structure at a low resolution according to certain embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIGS. 3A-3C schematically show Scanning Electron Microscopy images of a biocompatible structure at a high resolution according to certain embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 4 schematically shows procedures for producing a biocompatible structure according to certain embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIGS. 5A and 5B schematically show a pull test set up for measuring maximum load and maximum stress of polymer films according to certain embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 6 schematically shows maximum load of the polymer films according to certain embodiments of the present disclosure; and

FIG. 7 schematically shows maximum stress of the polymer films according to certain embodiments of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which exemplary embodiments of the disclosure are shown. This disclosure may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the disclosure to those skilled in the art. Like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout. As used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meaning of “a,” “an,” and “the” includes plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Also, as used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meaning of “in” includes “in” and “on” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Moreover, titles or subtitles may be used in the specification for the convenience of a reader, which has no influence on the scope of the disclosure. Additionally, some terms used in this specification are more specifically defined below.

Typically, terms such as “first”, “second”, “third”, and the like are used for distinguishing various elements, members, regions, layers, and areas from others. Therefore, the terms such as “first”, “second”, “third”, and the like do not limit the number of the elements, members, regions, layers, areas, or the like. Further, for example, the term “first” can be replaced with the term “second”, “third”, or the like.

Typically, terms such as “about,” “approximately,” “generally,” “substantially,” and the like unless otherwise indicated mean within 20 percent, preferably within 10 percent, preferably within 5 percent, and even more preferably within 3 percent of a given value or range. Numerical quantities given herein are approximate, meaning that the term “about,” “approximately,” “generally,” or “substantially” can be inferred if not expressly stated.

Typically, “nanoscopic-scale,” “nanoscopic,” “nanometer-scale,” “nanoscale,” the “nano-” prefix, and the like refers to elements or articles having widths or diameters of less than about 1 μm, preferably less than about 100 nm in some cases. Specified widths can be smallest width (i.e. a width as specified where, at that location, the article can have a larger width in a different dimension), or largest width (i.e. where, at that location, the article's width is no wider than as specified, but can have a length that is greater), unless pointed out otherwise.

FIG. 1A schematically shows structure of a biocompatible structure 100 according to certain embodiments of the present disclosure. The biocompatible structure 100 can be in any shape that conforms to a shape of an implant site. For example, the biocompatible structure can have a cylindrical shape, a rectangular shape, or a spherical shape.

The biocompatible structure includes two or more modified polymer layers 102 stacked together. As will be described below, the modified polymer layers 102 each have nanoparticles 112 dispersed in a polymer matrix 114. In certain embodiments, the nanoparticles 112 are hydroxypatite (HAP) nanoparticles. Further, as shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B, spacer particles 116 are located in between any two of the layers 102 and can function as spacer layer 106 between the polymer layers 102. In certain embodiments, the spacer particles 116 each have a diameter of about 0.2-100 μm. In certain embodiments, the spacer particles 116 are partially embedded, or trapped, in the surface portion of the polymer layers 102. In certain embodiments, the spacer particles 116 are formed as layers 106, and each spacer layer 106 can have a thickness between approximately 0.001 mm and approximately 50 mm, but are typically less than 3 mm. The layers can be mechanically stacked or applied in situ on top of one another. In certain embodiments, the spacer particles 116 can be bone particles or composite particulates as described below. In certain embodiments, the spacer particles 116 can be HAP particles as described below. In certain embodiments, a portion of a polymer layer 102 can contact a portion of an adjacent polymer layer 102. In certain embodiments, those contacted portions can cross-link with each other. In certain embodiments, a polymer coating 110 encloses the stacked polymer layers 102 and spacer layers 106. Further, the surface of the coating 110 can have trapped spacer particles 116. In certain embodiments, the spacer particles 116 can form a layer and cover a substantial portion of the entire coating 110.

The polymer layers 102 can have different sizes and shapes as desired. In certain embodiments, the polymer layers 102 can be made as strips. For example, the polymer strips 102 each can have a length of 0.005-50 cm, a width of 0.02-50 cm, and a thickness of 0.001-50 mm. The size of the entire structure 100 can vary in order to match the size of the bone defect that needs to be regenerated.

In certain embodiments, the polymer matrix 114 of the modified polymer layer 102 can be polyurethane. The particles 112 dispersed in the polymer matrix 114 can be hydroxypatite (HAP) nanoparticles. The weight percentage of the nanoparticles 112 in the polymer film/layer 102 is defined as the total weight (e.g., grams) of the nanoparticles 112 divided by the total of the weight of the nanoparticles 112 (grams) and the weight of the solid polymers 114 (grams) used for the preparation of the polymer film 102. For example, a total of A grams of nanoparticles 112 and a total of B grams of polymers 114 are used to manufacture a polymer film 102. The weight percentage of the nanoparticles 112 in the polymer film 102 is calculated as A/(A+B). In certain embodiments, the weight percentage of HAP nanoparticles 112 in the polymer layer 102 is about 0.05-95%. In certain embodiments, the weight percentage of HAP nanoparticles 112 in the polymer layer 102 is about 20%.

In certain embodiment, the nanoparticles 112 dispersed in the polymer layer 102 are Hydroxylapatite nanoparticles and can have a dimensional range between 1-100 nanometer (nm). Hydroxylapatite, also called hydroxyapatite (HA or HAP), is a naturally occurring mineral form of calcium apatite with the formula Ca₅(PO₄)₃(OH), but is usually written Ca₁₀(PO₄)₆(OH)₂ to denote that the crystal unit cell comprises two entities. Hydroxylapatite is the hydroxyl endmember of the complex apatite group. The OH⁻ ion can be replaced by fluoride, chloride or carbonate, producing fluorapatite or chlorapatite. It crystallizes in the hexagonal crystal system. Pure hydroxylapatite powder is white. Naturally occurring apatites can, however, also have brown, yellow, or green colorations, comparable to the discolorations of dental fluorosis. Up to 50% of bone by weight is a modified form of hydroxylapatite (known as bone mineral). In certain embodiments, the HAP nanoparticles dispersed in the polymer layer can be composed of pure HAP, having significant crystallinity and very good dispensability due to the presence of oxygen groups on the surface.

The presence of HAP nanoparticles 112 in the polymer film 114, among other things, contributes to the pore size and the strength of the polymer film 114. In addition, the concentration of HAP nanoparticles 112 is also related to the degradation rate of the polymer film 114 when the polymer film 114 is used as implant material.

In certain embodiments, the HAP nanoparticles 112 can enhance bone/mineralization in bone cells. The HAP nanoparticles 112, together with other nanomaterials, have the ability to increase the osteogenesis and mineralization in bone cells.

In certain embodiment, the spacer particles 116 between the polymer layers 102 of the present disclosure are bone particles. The bone particles 116 can be autografts, allografts, xenografts (usually bovine) or alloplastic bone grafts (synthetic, such as tricalcium phosphate). In certain embodiment, the bone particles 116 are treated with bone mineral products, or composite particles. Bones from slaughtered animals are an inexpensive raw material available in large quantities to produce bone mineral. Bones typically contain 50 to 60% of very fine crystallites of a form of modified hydroxylapatite, which is bonded by collagenic tissue and contains significant qualities of proteinaceous and other matter as well as associated fat and muscle tissues. Such a modified hydroxylapatite, in a pure state and has its essential crystal structure, represents a highly biocompatible remodeling bone implant material.

In certain embodiments, the bone particles 116 include hydroxyapatite like crystallites with a particular degree of crystallinity, habit, and size (irregular platelike morphology, 1-100 nm in thickness 1-100 nm in length). The specific surface chemistry of the bone particles 116 results from the calcium to phosphate ratio (37.5-38.0% calcium and 15.5-19.0% phosphorus). The inorganic phase of the bone particle 116 contains porosity including ultrastructural interstices (1-100 nm) between the crystallites occurring naturally and produced by removal of the organic phase, and microscopic spaces (0.1-200 μm) including osteocyte lacunae, canaliculi, vascular channels, volkman's canals, and the canals of haversian systems (100-500 nm). The specific surface area, which is a measure of porosity is in the range 10 to 200 m²/gm as determined by mercury porosimetry or BET surface area analysis. The crystallinity of the bone particle 116 can be characterized by X-ray diffraction and the porosity and crystallite morphology and size by electron microscopy.

In certain embodiment, the bone particles 116 of the present disclosure are demineralized bone particles 116 purchased from Geistlich BioOss, INC. The bone particles 116 can be of bovine origin and treated such that only the inorganic structure is left, while the organic materials are removed. The bone particles 116 are composed of powder particles with a diameter of 0.01-100 micrometer (μm).

In certain embodiments, the spacer particles 116 can be large particles of HAP that, e.g., are produced in the lab, or composite particles (polymer and inorganic particles).

In certain embodiments, the biocompatible structure 100 can include bioactive materials 126. In certain embodiments, the bioactive materials 126 can be sprayed on the surface of the biocompatible structure 100, and/or incorporated in the polymer structures 102 to promote bone growth.

The bioactive materials 126 can be proteins/peptides, HA, drugs, growth factors, antibiotics (such as tetracycline), and bone morphogenic proteins. Preferred bioactive agents 126 are those that enhance tissue regeneration and/or tissue adhesion. Illustrative examples include growth factors, antibiotics, immuno-stimulators, and immuno-suppressants. In one embodiment, the bioactive agent 126 may be a bone morphogenic protein such as bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP). In another embodiment, the bioactive agent 126 may be a growth factor such as fibroblast growth factors (FGF) or an agent which promotes the generation of connective tissue.

In certain embodiments, tissue can also be grown in vivo by implanting the biocompatible structure 100 and stem cells or other types of suitable cells (liver cells for the growth of liver tissue; myocardial cells, muscle cells for replacing/restoring damaged heart tissue; epithelial cells, connective tissue cells for skin grafts; osteblasts for bone generation) to an implant site. Alternatively, tissue can be grown in vitro on the biocompatible structure 100 and then implanted (for example, for growth of connective tissue/coronary vessels for arterial grafts).

Suitable living cells can be placed in the biocompatible structure before implantation or implanted together with the biocompatible structure 100 into a body. The living cells include epithelial cells (e.g., keratinocytes, adipocytes, hepatocytes), neurons, glial cells, astrocytes, podocytes, mammary epithelial cells, islet cells, endothelial cells (e.g., aortic, capillary and vein endothelial cells), and mesenchymal cells (e.g., dermal fibroblasts, mesothelial cells, osteoblasts), smooth muscle cells, striated muscle cells, ligament fibroblasts, tendon fibroblasts, chondrocytes, fibroblasts, and any of a variety of stem cells. Also suitable for use in the biocompatible structure 100,200 are genetically modified cells, immunologically masked cells, and the like. Appropriate extracellular matrix proteins (ECM) may be added to the biocompatible structure to further promote cell ingrowth, tissue development, and cell differentiation within the scaffold. ECM proteins can include one or more of fibronectin, laminin, vitronectin, tenascin, entactin, thrombospondin, elastin, gelatin, collagen, fibrillin, merosin, anchorin, chondronectin, link protein, bone sialoprotein, osteocalcin, osteopontin, epinectin, hyaluronectin, undulin, epiligrin, and kalinin.

Additional bioactive agent 126 incorporated in the biocompatible structure 100, among other things, includes biologically active macromolecules helpful for cell growth, morphogenesis, differentiation, and tissue building, include growth factors, proteoglycans, glycosaminoglycans and polysaccharides. These compounds are believed to contain biological, physiological, and structural information for development or regeneration of tissue structure and function.

In certain embodiments, the biocompatible structure 100 can be plasma-treated/activated/electro-sprayed to functionalize the surface of the biocompatible structure 100. Surface treatment can improve the hydrophilicity of the biocompatible structure 100 and promote the colonization of cells and the adhesion of bone particles to the surface and pores of the biocompatible structure 100. The surface can also be functionalized by electron or ion bombardment, laser irradiation and/or by any other physical or chemical surface reaction that affects the bonds near the surface. These processes can also help in sterilization of the implant. Plasma treatment breaks the surface bonds of the polymer. After plasma treatment, oxygen atoms “attach” to the surface, changing the surface energy of the surface such that the surface becomes more hydrophilic and has oxygen and nitrogen rich functional groups.

The biocompatible structure 100 of the present disclosure is highly porous, biocompatible, and allows for vascular ingrowth for bone/tissue regeneration. The surface typically does not inhibit any biological entity from interacting and to be hydrophilic or potentially become hydrophilic under different conditions or processes. Suitable materials for building structures for tissue/bone engineering and regeneration are certain polymers, ceramics, carbon-based materials and metals and metal composites. In certain embodiments, the polymer layers 102 of the biocompatible structure 100 of the present disclosure are formed from polyurethane. In certain embodiments, the biocompatible structure 100 has a layered structure composed of a polymeric material that may contain other substances, such as bioactive substances or substances promoting the generation of tissue growth. Those substances can be formed inside a polymer layer 102 or on the surface of a polymer layer 102. Some of the bioresorbable polymers may or may not require enzymes in order to degrade. The layered, porous design gives this structure a very high surface area for neovascularization and the growth of cells necessary for tissue regeneration. In addition, stem cells, osteoblasts, and other types of suitable cells can be incorporated into the system to aid in tissue generation. The biocompatible structure 100 can assume different shapes and dimensions as may be required for a particular application. The biocompatible structure 100 can be properly positioned in the surgical site directly or with medical pins, screws, or other devices.

The biocompatible structure 100 is configured such that the degradation rate or the resorption rate of the biocompatible structure 100 is substantially matching a rate of tissue generation in the biocompatible structure 100. The controllable degradation rate of the biocompatible structure 100 can also provide controllable release of the bioactive substance or cells formed in the biocompatible structure 100. The polymer may have a different degradation rate than that of the biocompatible structure 100, but it contributes significantly to the degradation rate of the biocompatible structure 100. Accordingly, a polymer with suitable degradation property is chosen to produce the biocompatible structure 100 of the present disclosure.

The polymer layers 102 can be degraded by several mechanisms. The most common mechanism is diffusion. Further, the bioactive substances (agent) of the biocompatible structure can diffuse in various manners. The bioactive agent (drug) can have a core surrounded by an inert diffusion barrier, which can be membranes, capsules, microcapsules, liposomes, and hollow fibers. Alternatively, the active agent can be dispersed or dissolved in an inert polymer. Drug diffusion through the polymer matrix is the rate-limiting step, and release rates are determined by the choice of polymer and its consequent effect on the diffusion and partition coefficient of the drug to be released. By adjusting the diffusion method of the bioactive agent or cells, and components of the biocompatible structure component, suitable rate of bioactive agent or cells is achieved.

In certain embodiments, after implantation the biocompatible structure 100 can be eventually absorbed by the body, for example, by conversion of a material that is insoluble in water into one that is water/liquid-soluble, and thus need not be removed surgically.

In certain embodiments, the polymer layers 102 in the biocompatible structure 100 are biocompatible, processable, sterilizable, and capable of controlled stability or degradation in response to biological conditions. The reasons for designing a biocompatible structure 100 that degrades over time often go beyond the obvious desire to eliminate the need for retrieval. For example, the very strength of a rigid metallic implant used in bone fixation can lead to problems with “stress shielding,” whereas a bioresorbable implant can increase ultimate bone strength by slowly transferring load to the bone as it heals. For drug delivery, the specific properties of various degradable systems can be precisely tailored to achieve optimal release kinetics of the drug or active agent.

An ideal biodegradable polymer layer 102 for medical applications typically has adequate mechanical properties to match the application (strong enough but not too strong), does not induce inflammation or other toxic response, may be fully metabolized once it degrades, and is sterilizable and easily processed into a final end product with an acceptable shelf life. In general, polymer degradation is accelerated by greater hydrophilicity in the backbone or end groups, greater reactivity among hydrolytic groups in the backbone, less crystallinity, greater porosity, and smaller finished device size.

A wide range of synthetic biodegradable polymers can be used to form the polymer matrix 102 of the present disclosure, including polylactide (PLA), polyglycolide (PGA), poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), poly(e-caprolactone), polydioxanone, polyanhydride, trimethylene carbonate, poly(β-hydroxybutyrate), poly(g-ethyl glutamate), poly(DTH iminocarbonate), poly(bisphenol A iminocarbonate), poly(ortho ester), polycyanoacrylate, and polyphosphazene. There are also a number of biodegradable polymers derived from natural sources such as modified polysaccharides (cellulose, chitin, dextran) or modified proteins (fibrin, casein) that can be used to form the polymer matrix of the present disclosure.

Other materials can be tyrosine-derived polycarbonate poly(DTE-co-DT carbonate), in which the pendant group via the tyrosine—an amino acid—is either an ethyl ester (DTE) or free carboxylate (DT). Through alteration of the ratio of DTE to DT, the material's hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance and rate of in vivo degradation can be manipulated. It was shown that, as DT content increases, pore size decreases, the polymers become more hydrophilic and anionic, and cells attach more readily.

These materials are subject to both hydrolysis (via ester bonds) and oxidation (via ether bonds). Degradation rate is influenced by PEO molecular weight and content, and the copolymer with the highest water uptake degrades most rapidly.

These polymeric materials 102 can also be developed in such a way that they are stable in the biological environment, and degrade only under specific enzymatic conditions (plasmin, etc.). These materials can also include partially expressed fragments of human or animal fibrin such that the system degrades only in contact with plasmin.

The polymer 114 is preferably in solution mixed with a suitable solvent, and other substances can be added to the solution, for example, collagen, drugs, proteins, pep tides, hydroxyapetite crystals (HA), and antibiotics, depending on the type of tissue to be grown. The solution can be sonicated to promote mixing of the constituents.

By chosen a suitable polymer 114, the biocompatible structure 100 can achieve controllable supply of therapeutic, analgesic and/or antibacterial substances, growth factors, proteins, peptides, drugs, tissue subcomponents including but not limited to bone particles and hydroxyappetite, which promote growth, prevent infections and the like.

FIG. 2 schematically shows a Scanning Electron Microscopy image of a biocompatible structure 100 at a low resolution according to certain embodiments of the present disclosure. The biocompatible structure 100 has bone particles 116 over porous polymer membrane matrix and a hollow interior to promote cellular growth and blood flow. In FIG. 2, bioactive materials 126 are shown on the surface of the biocompatible structure 100. In certain embodiments, the bioactive materials 126 can be sprayed on the surface of the biocompatible structure 100, and/or incorporated in the polymer structures 102 to promote bone growth.

FIGS. 3A-3C schematically shows Scanning Electron Microscopy images of a biocompatible structure 100 at high resolutions according to certain embodiments of the present disclosure. As shown in FIGS. 3A-3C, the surface of the biocompatible structure 100 made from polyurethane polymer and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles can be very rough and can have one or more polymeric pores 304. The polymeric pores 304 typically are large in size. The size of the polymeric pores 304 can be from about 0.001 μm up to about 10 mm. The nanostructural hydroxyapatatite 308 at the surface of the biocompatible structure 300 can have a size of about 1 nm to about 500 nm, and the majority of the nanostructural hydroxyapatite 308 can have a size of about 2 nm to about 300 nm Inside the biocompatible structure 100 is semi-empty due to the spacing between the layers offered by the bone particles. The pore size should vary both in the range of nanometer (nm) and the range of micrometer (μm).

When placed in an implant site, new tissue of a patient can grow across the pores on the surface of the biocompatible structure, and inside the hollow interior of the biocompatible structure.

In certain embodiments, the biocompatible structure 100 useful for bone and tissue regeneration can be produced by the following procedures: A polymer 114 is dissolved in a solvent to form a first solution. HAP nanoparticles 112 are added to the first solution to form a second solution. The second solution is applied to a surface to form a polymer film on the surface. A weight percentage of the first tissue forming material to the polymer is about 0.5-95%. The polymer film is cut into a plurality of strips 102. The biocompatible structure is formed by stacking the strips 102 and placing bone particle layers 106 in between the strips 102. Then the structure is coated by a coating 110 formed from the second solution, and bone particles 116 are then added onto the surface of the coating 110.

(1) Dissolving a Polymer in a Solvent to Form a First Solution.

In certain embodiments, a polymer 114 is dissolved in a solvent to form a first solution. The polymer 114 can be a synthetic biodegradable polymer, a biodegradable polymer derived from natural source, or their mixture. In certain embodiment, suitable synthetic biodegradable polymer may include polyurethane, polylactide (PLA), polyglycolide (PGA), poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), poly(e-caprolactone), polydioxanone, polyanhydride, trimethylene carbonate, poly(β-hydroxybutyrate), poly(g-ethyl glutamate), poly(DTH iminocarbonate), poly(bisphenol A iminocarbonate), poly(ortho ester), polycyanoacrylate, polyphosphazene, or their mixture. In certain embodiments, the biodegradable polymer derived from natural source may include modified polysaccharides (cellulose, chitin, dextran), modified proteins (fibrin, casein), or their mixture.

In certain embodiment, the polymer 114 is an ester-type hydrophilic polyurethane with a linear expansion of 50-65%. The water uptake of the polymer 114 varies with its composition, anywhere from 30-90%. The polymer 114 is thermoplastic. Alternatively, a thermosetting polymer 114 may work equally well. In certain embodiment, the polymer 114 may be mixed with other polymers to control its degradation rate. In certain embodiment, the polymer is a powder with particles having a diameter of about 0.02-50 mm.

The solvent can be methanol or ethanol or any solvent of the polymer used. In certain embodiment, other organic or inorganic solvent (polar aprotic and protic) may also be used. In certain embodiments, the solvent is at least one of acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, nitromethane, n-propanol, n-butanol, isopropanol, propylene carbonate, dymethil sulfoxide, acetonitrile, dimethylformamide, ethyl acetate, and tetrahydrofuran, dichloromethane.

The polymer 114 is evenly distributed in the first solution. In certain embodiment, low power heating can be used to help the dissolvation of the polymer in the solvent. In certain embodiments, stirring is used to accelerate the uniform distribution of the polymer in the first solution. In certain embodiment, after complete dissolvation of the solid polymer in the solvent, the first solution has a low viscosity.

(2) Adding a First Tissue Forming Material 112 to the First Solution to Form a Second Solution.

The first tissue forming material 112 is then added to the first solution to form a second solution. In certain embodiments, the first tissue forming material 112 may include nanoparticles of hydroxyapatite (HAP), tricalcium phosphates, mixed calcium phosphates and calcium carbonate, bone particles of zenograft, allografts, autografts, alloplastic grafts, or a mixture thereof.

In certain embodiment, the HAP nanoparticles 112 have a dimensional range between 1-100 nm. The HAP nanoparticles 112 can be composed of pure HAP, having significant crystallinity, and having very good dispensability due to the presence of oxygen groups on the surface.

The polymer 114 and the first tissue forming material 112 are evenly distributed in the second solution. In certain embodiments, sonication is used to accelerate the homogenization of the polymer 114 and the first tissue forming material 112 in the second solution.

The weight percentage of the polymer 114 to the first tissue forming material 112 in the second solution is about 20:1 to 2:1. The ratio is related with the characteristics of the produced biocompatible structure 100. The characteristics of the biocompatible structure 100 include resistance to load and stress, porosity, degradation rate, etc. In certain embodiments, the ratio of the polymer 114 to the first tissue forming material 112 can be adjusted to meet requirement of the condition of a patient, including the bone implant position, size, and metabolic rate of the patient.

In certain embodiment, the first polymer 114 is polyurethane and the first tissue forming material 112 is HAP nanopowder containing HAP nanoparticles. The weight ratio of the added dry HAP nanopowder to the dry mass of the added polymer varies according to the purpose of use.

In certain embodiment, as described below in connection with FIGS. 6-7, if the weight ratio of the dry HAP nanopowders to the dry mass of polyurethane is below 25% (i.e., the weight percentage of dry HAP nanopowder in the total weight of dry HAP nanopower and dry mass of polymer is about 20%), the produced polymer film 102 as described below is strong and hard. If the weight percentage of the dry HAP nanopowders to the polyurethane is above 40%, the produced the polymer film as described below is weak and breaks easily. In certain embodiment, the HAP nanoparticles 112 do not allow a good crosslinking of the polymer strands. Therefore the polymer film produced with a high ratio of HAP nanoparticles 112 is very powdery and breaks very easily.

(3) Applying the Second Solution to a Surface to Form a Polymer Film on the Surface.

In certain embodiment, the polymer film is formed by applying the second solution to a surface, and allowing it to dry. In certain embodiment, the second solution can be dried at a room temperature (e.g., 25° C.). In certain embodiment, the second solution is mildly heated to form the polymer film on the surface, for example, at a temperature higher than room temperature (e.g., 25° C.) and lower than 80° C. In certain embodiment, the drying process is under a vacuum condition. In certain embodiment, the surface is a Teflon surface. In certain embodiment, the surface is a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) surface. In certain embodiment, the second solution can be dried on a PTFE surface under vacuum and under mild heat for less than 24 hours to form the polymer film. The thickness of the polymer film can be about 2-10 mm.

(4) Cutting the Polymer Film into a Plurality of Strips.

In certain embodiments, the formed polymer film is cut into the plurality of strips. The strips can be any suitable shape and size to produce a biocompatible structure with a predetermined shape and size. In certain embodiment, each of the strips 102 is identical to other strips. In certain embodiment, each of the strips has a length of about 0.02-50 cm, a width of about 0.02-50 cm, and a thickness of about 0.001-50 mm.

(5) Forming the Biocompatible Structure 100 by the Strips, the Second Solution, and a Second Tissue Forming Material.

In certain embodiment, the biocompatible structure 100 is formed from the strips, the second solution, and a second tissue forming material and the following operations:

(a) Constructing a scaffold by stacking the strips to form polymer layers 102 and adding bone particle layers 106 between the polymer layers. In certain embodiments, a strip is disposed on a surface as the first polymer layer 102. A first layer of bone particles 106 is then applied on the first polymer layer 102. A second strip is then used to cover the first bone particle layer 106 to form the second polymer layer 102. By alternatively disposing polymer layers 102 and bone particle layers 106, the scaffold with a predetermined shape and size is constructed. The scaffold structure composed of polymer layer 102 containing HAP nanoparticles 112, bone particle layer 106, polymer layer 102 containing HAP nanoparticles 112, bone particle layer 106 alternatively. In certain embodiments, at least one polymer layer 102 is located as one of the outside layers of the scaffold. In certain embodiment, at least one bone particle layer 106 is located as one of the outside layers of the scaffold. In order for the entire structure to stay together, methanol or other solvent of the polymer is added by, for example pipetting, to superficially liquefy the polymer layers 102, such that the bone particles 116 can be “trapped” in the polymer layers 102 when the structure dries. The bone particles 116 can be partially embedded in the polymer layers 102. After the polymer layers 102 re-solidifies, the bone particle layers 106 are connected with the polymer layers 102.

(b) Applying the second solution to the scaffold to form a coated scaffold. In certain embodiments, the scaffold built as described above is then coated by covering with a polymer film that is in a liquid form. In certain embodiment, the second solution is a sticky solution before applying to the scaffold. In certain embodiment, part of the second solution poured on the surface of the scaffold penetrates to the inside of the scaffold. The poured second solution forms a coat 110 on the surface of the scaffold and helps to hold the components of the scaffold together.

(c) In certain embodiment, the forming operation further includes adding the second tissue forming material to the coated scaffold to form the biocompatible structure 100. In certain embodiment, the second tissue forming material can be nano-sized bone particles, micro-sized bone particles, or a mixture thereof. The structure is then allowed to dry overnight under vacuum and mild heat to form the biocompatible structure according to the present disclosure.

The biocompatible structure 100 can be any shape and size such that the biocompatible structure matches the size of the bone defect that needs to be regenerated. In certain embodiment, the biocompatible structure has a cylindrical shape or a spherical shape. In certain embodiment, the length of the biocompatible structure is about 2.5 cm (1 inch) and the diameter is about 0.1-1 cm, which matches the diameter of the bone that needs to be replaced.

In certain embodiment, the method further includes subjecting the biocompatible structure 100 to plasma treatment. For example, once completely dried, the biocompatible structure 100 is placed into glass vials for storage. The biocompatible structure 100 is plasma treated by a radio frequency (RF) plasma discharge device, under an environment of oxygen, nitrogen or a mixture of oxygen and nitrogen. In certain embodiment, the RF plasma treatment time is about 1-3 minutes. In certain embodiment, the plasma treated biocompatible structure 100 is sterilized and sent for animal studies. The purpose of the plasma treatment is to break the surface bonds of the polymer. After plasma treatment, oxygen atoms “attach” to the surface, changing the surface energy of the surface such that the surface becomes more hydrophilic and has oxygen and nitrogen rich functional groups.

In certain embodiment, the method of manufacturing the biocompatible structure 100 further includes adding a third tissue forming material to the biocompatible structure 100. In certain embodiment, the third tissue forming material includes a bioactive material, cells, or a mixture thereof. The bioactive material includes proteins, enzymes, growth factors, amino acids, bone morphogenic proteins, platelet derived growth factors, vascular endothelial growth factors, or a mixture thereof. The cells includes epithelial cells, neurons, glial cells, astrocytes, podocytes, mammary epithelial cells, islet cells, endothelial cells, mesenchymal cells, stem cells, osteoblast, muscle cells, striated muscle cells, fibroblasts, hepatocytes, ligament fibroblasts, tendon fibroblasts, chondrocytes, or a mixture thereof.

The biocompatible structure 100 can be any shape, size and weight to fit with an implant site. In certain embodiment, long bones were surgically removed from the tibia of goats, and biocompatible structures conform to the implant sited of the goats according to the present disclosure are used for bone regeneration of the goats.

In certain embodiment, when the biocompatible structure 100 is used in dental applications for bone generation, the concentration of HAP nanoparticles can be much higher than the concentration of HAP nanoparticles in the biocompatible structure for some other bone regeneration, for example, tibia regeneration. In certain embodiment, the biocompatible structure for dental applications can be crumbled and forms a lot of particles with high surface area.

In certain embodiment, instead of manufacturing the biocompatible structure 100 and then using it as implant material, the biocompatible structure 100 can also be formed in situ. For example, a first polymer layer is air sprayed at an implant site or a bone defect area, a first layer of bone particles is then added to the polymer layer and deposits on the polymer layer. After that, a second polymer layer is air sprayed on the first bone particle layer, followed by adding a second layer of bone particles. The process is repeated until the biocompatible structure, including alternating polymer layers and bone particle layers, matches the implant site or mimics the bone defect that needs to be replaced.

In certain embodiment, a Doctor of Medicine (MD) can take a 3D computer axial tomography scan (CAT) of a patient and sent the result for example by emailing the CAT scan file to a manufacturer. The manufacturer then can build the implant according to the present disclosure to perfectly match the actual bone defect.

FIG. 4 illustrates an example of preparing a biocompatible structure 400 according to certain embodiments of the present disclosure.

In operation 402, 500 ml methanol is added to a 1 L beaker. The beaker is placed on a magnetic stirrer and a magnetic stir bar is used for mixing. 80 grams polyurethane 114 is then added to the methanol in the beaker. The solution is mixed by the stirring bar to completely dissolve the polyurethane in the methanol solvent and uniformly distributed the polyurethane 114 in the solution. The mixing and dissolving of polyurethane is at room temperature. In certain embodiment, the solution can be heated to accelerate the process.

In operation 406, 20 gram HAP nanoparticles 112 (e.g., Berkeley Advanced Biomaterials, Inc.) is then added to the solution. Sonication is applied to guarantee the evenly distribution of the HAP nanoparticles 112 in the solution. (Soniactor, power and time of the sonication).

In operation 410, 10 ml of the solution is pipetted from the beaker and applied to a PTFE surface. A thin layer of solution is formed on the PTEF surface. The thin layer of solution is allowed to dry at room temperature for variable times to form a polymer film. Alternatively, the layer of solution on the PTFE surface can be placed in an oven to heat or low pressure for a period of time to accelerate the formation of the polymer film.

In certain embodiment, the temperature can be about 30-70° C., and the period of time for the heating is about 2-1500 minutes. In certain embodiment, the second solution is allowed to dry on a PTFE surface under vacuum under mild heat for less than 24 hours to form the polymer film. The thickness of the polymer film can be about 0.01-50 mm.

In operation 414, the polymer film is then cut into identical strips with a length of about 0.05-20 cm, a width of about 0.02-5 cm, and a thickness of about 0.01-50 mm. In certain embodiment, the polymer film can be cut into strips with varies shape and size.

In operation 418, a first strip is placed on the PTFE surface to form a first polymer layer 102. A first layer of bone particles 106 is added on the surface of the first polymer layer 102. A second strip is placed onto the first bone particle layer 106 to form a second polymer layer 102. Then a second bone particle layer 106 is formed on the second polymer layer 102. By alternatively disposing the strips and the bond particle layers, a three-dimensional scaffold is formed with a predetermined shape and size.

In order for the entire structure to stay together, methanol or other solvent of the polymer is added by, for example pipetting, to superficially liquefy the polymer layers 102, such that the bone particles 116 can be “trapped” in the polymer layers 102 when the structure dries. The bone particles 116 can be partially embedded in the polymer layers 102. After the polymer layers 102 re-solidifies, the bone particle layers 106 are connected with the polymer layers 102. Alternatively, after adding each bone particle layer 106, the methanol or other solvent can be added to trap or embed the bone particles 116 in the corresponding polymer layers 102.

Next, 1 ml of the methanol/polyurethane/HAP nanoparticle solution is added to the surface of the three-dimensional scaffold and allowed to dry. Accordingly, a coating 110 is formed on the surface of the three-dimensional scaffold. In certain embodiment, the coating 110 not only covers the outside of the three-dimensional scaffold, but also can penetrate to the inside of the three-dimensional scaffold.

Further, bone particles 116 or other suitable particles may be added to the surface of the coating 110.

In operation 422, the structure is then dried under vacuum overnight. In certain embodiment, the structure is further subjected to plasma treatment.

A series of biocompatible structures 100 is produced according to the above example by varying the HAP concentration. The HAP concentration in the polymer film is closely related with the characters of the produced biocompatible structure 100.

FIGS. 5A and 5B show a pull test system 500 used to measure the maximum load and maximum stress of polymer films 550 with various concentrations of polyurethane and HAP nanoparticle in accordance with certain embodiments of the present disclosure. In one example, the mechanical behavior of the composites was analyzed using an ADMET 7600 EXPERT single-column, universal, electromechanical testing machine. The instrument performs a “pull test” by stretching the polymer film in its axial direction and instantaneously produces a “csv” file using the eP2 Digital Controller and Gauge Safe Basic Testing Software. The pull test system 500 includes a pull test structure 510, a digital controller 530 and, optionally, a computer 550. The pull test structure 510 has a base 511, a column 513 fixed to and perpendicular to the base 511, a bottom head 515 connected with two bottom grips 517a and 517b facing each other, a top head 521 connected with two top grips 519a and 519b facing each other, a scale 523 attached to the column 513, and a rail 525 placed in the column 513. At least one of the top head 521 and the bottom head 515 is connected with the rail 525 and is movable along the rail 525. In this embodiment, the top head 521 is connected through a chain or a cable to a motor (not shown) and the chain or the cable pulls/drives the top head 521 along the rail 525. The top grips 519a/519b move together and at the same speed with the top head 521.

Polymer films 550 were prepared and tested. In certain embodiment, the polymer films 550 contain various concentrations of polyurethane and HAP nanoparticles. In one embodiment, the weight percentage of the HAP nanoparticles in the polymer films are 0%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 30% respectively. As described above, the weight percentage of the HAP nanoparticles is defined as the weight of the HAP nanoparticle powder (in gram) used for preparing the polymer film divided by the total weight of HAP nanoparticle powder (in gram) and solid polymers (in gram) used for preparing the polymer film 550. The polymer films 550 used in the test have predetermined dimensions. In certain embodiments, the size of the polymer films 550 is 6 cm×1.5 cm×0.02 cm. In certain embodiment, polymer films with the same concentration of HAP nanoparticles are prepared with different sizes for testing.

During the maximum load and maximum stress testing process, the top grips 521a/521b and the bottom grips 517a/517b clip two ends of the polymer film 550 in the longitudinal direction of the polymer film 550. The dimension of the polymer film 550 and the parameters of the force to be used are entered into the digital controller 530. In certain embodiments, the length of the polymer film used in the calculation is an effective length, for example, measured by the scale, from the bottom edges of the top grips 519a/519b to the top edges of the bottom grips 517a/517b. In certain embodiments, if the polymer film 550 clipped between the top grips 5191/b and the bottom grips 517a/b has a dog bone shape, the length used for calculation is the narrow portion of the dog bone shape. When the testing starts, the motor moves at least one of the top head 521 and the bottom head 515, for example, the top head 521. The top grips 519a/519b move together and at the same speed with the top head 521 to pull the polymer film 550 at a predetermined speed. In certain embodiment, the speed can be 0.01-2.5 mm per minute. The top grips 519a/519b move along the rail 525 at a predetermined speed to pull the polymer film 550 until the polymer film 550 breaks. The original dimensions of the polymer film 550, the moving speed of the top grips 519a/519b, the length of the polymer film 550 immediately before it breaks are recorded. The maximum load and the maximum stress are calculated. In certain embodiments, the calculation is performed by a processor (not shown) in the computer 550. The maximum load is the pull force (newton) applied to the polymer film 550 when the polymer film breaks. The maximum stress (KPa) is the pull force applied to the polymer film 550 when the polymer film 550 breaks divided by the cross-sectional area of the polymer film 550 (the original width times the original thickness of the polymer film 550).

The load and stress tests are performed for the polymer films 550 made according to the present disclosure. In certain embodiments, the polymer films contain various concentrations of polyurethane and HAP nanoparticles.

FIG. 6 is a load graph of the polymer films 550 in a two dimensional coordinate system, which shows a functional relationship between the weight percentage of the HAP nanoparticles in a polymer film and a maximum load of that polymer film. The X-axis of the coordinate system is the weight percentage of the HAP nanoparticles and the Y-axis of the coordinate system is the maximum load of the polymer film. As shown in FIG. 6, the maximum load (in newton) for the polymer films 550 containing 0%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 5%, 10%, 20% and 30% of HAP nanoparticles are measured and calculated. The maximum load increases sharply from about 20 newton (N) to about 44 N when the HAP concentration increases from 0% to about 1%. Then the maximum load drops to about 31 N when the HAP concentration increases from 1% to around 10%. After that, the maximum load increases again to about 41 N at around 20% HAP concentration and drops to about 38 N at around 30% HAP concentration. Thus, the load graph has two peaks corresponding to 1% and around 20% of HAP concentration. In certain embodiment, the second peak at around 20% HAP concentration in the load graph is named load peak.

FIG. 7 is a stress graph of the polymer films 550 in a two dimensional coordinate system, which shows a functional relationship between the weight percentage of the HAP nanoparticles in a polymer film and a maximum load of that polymer film. The X-axis of the coordinate system is the weight percentage of the HAP nanoparticles and the Y-axis of the coordinate system is the maximum stress of the polymer film 550. As shown in FIG. 7, the maximum stress (in KPa) for the polymer films containing 0%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 5%, 10%, 20% and 30% of HAP nanoparticles are measured and calculated. The maximum stress increases from about 11,000 KPa to about 15,000 KPa when the HAP concentration increases from 0% to about 1%. Then the maximum stress decreases to about 13,600 KPa when the HAP concentration increases from 1% to about 3%. After that, the maximum stress increases to about 22,000 KPa when the HAP concentration increases from about 3% to about 20%. Further increasing HAP concentration in the polymer films from about 20% to 30% can result in decreasing of the maximum stress from 22,000 to about 20,800 KPa. Thus, the stress graph has two peaks corresponding to 1% and 20% of HAP concentration. In certain embodiment, the second peak at 20% HAP concentration in the stress graph is named stress peak.

In certain embodiments, a computer 550 can be used to calculate optimal weight percentage of HAP in the polymer film 550 according to the above load and stress graphs of a series of polymer films 550. The computer 550, utilizing one or more CPUs, can receive the data from the pull test structure 510 and the digital controller 530, run a calculation software, and then present the result on a monitor.

An optimal weigh percentage of HAP in the polymer film 550 is determined based on the results from the load graph and the stress graph by the computer 530. In certain embodiments, both the load graph and the stress graph have at least two peaks. The first peak 604 in the load graph corresponding to a lower HAP concentration, and the second peak 608 in the load graph corresponding to a higher HAP concentration. The first peak 704 in the stress graph corresponding to a lower HAP concentration, and the second peak 708 in the stress graph corresponding to a higher HAP concentration. The second peak 608 in the load graph is named load peak 608, and the second peak 708 in the stress graph is named stress peak 708. The peak values from the load peak 608 and the stress peak 708 are extracted. In this example, both of the load peak 608 and the stress peak 708 correspond to a HAP weight percentage (HAP concentration) of 20%. The maximum value and the minimum value of the load peak 608 and the stress peak 708 are determined. In this example, both the maximum value and the minimum value are 20%, which is chosen as an optimal concentration. The optimal concentration range has an upper limit value and a lower limit value. The upper limit value is the maximum value plus a first predetermined value. The lower limit value is the minimum value minus a second predetermined value. Each of the first predetermined value and the second predetermined value can be, for example, 10%, 5%, or 0%. Accordingly, in this example, the optimal concentration range of the HAP in the polymer film is 10%-30%, preferably 15%-25%, and more preferably 20%.

In another example, the load peak 608 and the stress peak 708 have different values. For example, the load peak may be at 17.5% and the stress peak may be at 22.5%. Accordingly, the maximum value is 22.5% and the minimum value is 17.5%, and any HAP concentration in the range of 17.5% to 22.5% can be chosen as an optimal concentration. With the first and second predetermined values at about 10%, preferably 5%, and more preferably 0%, the optimal concentration ranges of the HAP weight percentage in the polymer film are 7.5%-32.5%, preferably 12.5%-27.5%, and more preferably 17.5%-22.5%. Accordingly, any HAP concentration in the above ranges can be chosen as an optimal concentration. In other embodiments, the first and second predetermined values can be different values.

In certain embodiments, according to the results shown in FIGS. 6 and 7, the polymer film with 20% HAP concentration shows good structure stability and strength.

In certain embodiments, the biocompatible structure 100 prepared according to the present disclosure for the treatment of animals and/or humans. In certain embodiment, long bones were surgically removed from the tibia of goats. For generating long bones of these goats, biocompatible structures of a weight about 1.0-2.5 grams (g) were used. For example, 10 implants with the weight of 2.39 g, 2.34 g, 2.11 g, 1.86 g, 2.135 g, 2.18 g, 1.55 g, 2.5 g, 1.22 g, and 1.69 g, respectively, were used to generate long bones for the goats with surgically removed tibia part. For the above 10 examples, the biocompatible structure was made by using 4.52 g of polymer (polyurethane), 0.45 g of HAP nanoparticles, and 15 g of bone particles.

The bone growth using the biocompatible structures 100 according to embodiments of the present disclosure has maturity and integrity.

The foregoing description of the exemplary embodiments of the disclosure has been presented only for the purposes of illustration and description and is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching.

The embodiments are chosen and described in order to explain the principles of the disclosure and their practical application so as to activate others skilled in the art to utilize the disclosure and various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. Alternative embodiments will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which the present disclosure pertains without departing from its spirit and scope. Accordingly, the scope of the present disclosure is defined by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description and the exemplary embodiments described therein.

Claims

1. A method for producing a biocompatible structure, comprising: obtaining a load graph representing a functional relationship between a weight percentage of tissue forming nanoparticles in a polymer film and a maximum load of that polymer film;obtaining a stress graph representing a functional relationship between the weight percentage of tissue forming nanoparticles in a polymer film and maximum stress of that polymer film;determining a first weight percentage corresponding to a peak of the load graph and determining a second weight percentage corresponding to a peak of the stress graph;determining an optimal weight percentage based on the first and second weight percentage values; andproducing a biocompatible polymer film having first tissue forming particles at the optimal weight percentage, wherein the first tissue forming particles are nanoparticles.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the load graph has a first peak and a second peak; wherein a weight percentage corresponding to the second peak is larger than a weight percentage corresponding to the first peak; and wherein the first weight percentage is the weight percentage corresponding to the second peak.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the stress graph has a first peak and a second peak; wherein a weight percentage corresponding to the second peak is larger than a weight percentage corresponding to the first peak; and wherein the second weight percentage is the weight percentage corresponding to the second peak.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising: determining an upper limit value of a range of the optimal weight percentage as a maximum value of the first weight percentage and the second weight percentage plus a first predetermined percentage;determining a lower limit value of the range as a minimum value of the first weight percentage and the second weight percentage minus a second predetermined percentage; andselecting a percentage from the range as the optimal weight percentage.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein each of the first and second predetermined percentages is about 10%.

6. The method of claim 4, wherein each of the first and second predetermined percentages is about 5%.

7. The method of claim 4, wherein each of the first and second predetermined percentages is about 0%.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising: determining an upper limit value of a range of the optimal weight percentage as an average of the first weight percentage and the second weight percentage plus a third predetermined percentage;determining a lower limit value of the range of the optimal weight percentage as the average minus a fourth predetermined percentage; andselecting a percentage from the range as the optimal weight percentage.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the third or the fourth predetermined percentage is about 10%.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein the third or the fourth predetermined percentage is about 5%.

11. The method of claim 8, wherein the third or the fourth predetermined percentage is about 0%.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the optimal weight percentage is in a range from about 0% to about 95%.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the optimal weight percentage is in a range from about 0% to about 30%.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the optimal weight percentage is about 20%.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein polymers in the biocompatible polymer film comprise a synthetic biodegradable polymer, a biodegradable polymer derived from natural source, or a mixture thereof; wherein the synthetic biodegradable polymer comprises polyurethane, polylactide (PLA), polyglycolide (PGA), poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), poly(e-caprolactone), polydioxanone, polyanhydride, trimethylene carbonate, poly(β-hydroxybutyrate), poly(g-ethyl glutamate), poly(DTH iminocarbonate), poly(bisphenol A iminocarbonate), poly(ortho ester), polycyanoacrylate, polyphosphazene, or a mixture thereof; andwherein the biodegradable polymer derived from natural source comprises modified polysaccharides, modified proteins, or a mixture thereof.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the first tissue forming nanoparticles comprise nanoparticles of hydroxypatites, tricalcium phosphates, mixed calcium phosphates and calcium carbonate, bone particles of zenograft, bone particles of allografts, autografts, bone particles of alloplastic grafts, or a mixture thereof.

17. The method of claim 1, further comprising: dissolving a polymer in a solvent to form a first solution;adding the first tissue forming nanoparticles to the first solution to form a second solution;applying the second solution to a surface to form the polymer film on the surface, wherein the first tissue forming nanoparticles are dispersed in the polymer film;dividing the polymer film into a plurality of strips; andforming a layered biocompatible structure by the strips, the second solution, and second tissue forming particles, wherein the second tissue forming particles are placed between two of the strips,wherein the polymer film has the optimal weight percentage of the first tissue forming nanoparticles.

18. The method of claim 17, further comprising stirring the first solution to uniformly distribute the polymer in the first solution, and sonicating the second solution to uniformly distribute the polymer and the first tissue forming nanoparticles in the second solution.

19. The method of claim 17, wherein the forming the biocompatible structure comprises: constructing a scaffold by stacking the strips to form polymer layers and adding the second tissue forming particles between the polymer layers;applying the second solution to the scaffold to form a coated scaffold; andadding the second tissue forming particles to the coated scaffold to form the biocompatible structure,wherein the scaffold is formed by stacking the strips and layers of the second tissue forming particles alternatively.

20. The method of claim 19, further comprising plasma treating the biocompatible structure.

21. The method of claim 17, wherein the second tissue forming particles comprise nano-sized bone particles, micro-sized bone particles, or a mixture thereof.

22. The method of claim 17, wherein the strip has a length of about 0.005-50 centimeter, a width of about 0.002-50 centimeter, and a thickness of about 0.001-500 millimeter, and the biocompatible structure is in a cylindrical shape or a spherical shape.

23. The method of claim 17, further comprising adding a third tissue forming material to the biocompatible structure, wherein the third tissue forming material comprises a bioactive material, cells, or a mixture thereof;wherein the bioactive material comprises proteins, enzymes, growth factors, amino acids, bone morphogenic proteins, platelet derived growth factors, vascular endothelial growth factors, or a mixture thereof; andwherein the cells comprises epithelial cells, neurons, glial cells, astrocytes, podocytes, mammary epithelial cells, islet cells, endothelial cells, mesenchymal cells, stem cells, osteoblast, muscle cells, striated muscle cells, fibroblasts, hepatocytes, ligament fibroblasts, tendon fibroblasts, chondrocytes, or a mixture thereof.

24. A method for producing a polymer film, comprising: obtaining a first graph representing a functional relationship between a weight percentage of tissue forming nanoparticles in a polymer film and a first property of that polymer film;obtaining a second graph representing a functional relationship between the weight percentage of tissue forming nanoparticles in a polymer film and a second property of that polymer film;determining a first weight percentage corresponding to a peak of the first graph and determining a second weight percentage corresponding to a peak of the second graph;determining an optimal weight percentage based on the first and second weight percentage values; andproducing a polymer film having tissue forming nanoparticles at the optimal weight percentage.

25. The method of claim 24, wherein the first graph is a load graph representing a functional relationship between a weight percentage of tissue forming nanoparticles in a polymer film and a maximum load of that polymer film; andwherein the second graph is a stress graph representing a functional relationship between the weight percentage of tissue forming nanoparticles in a polymer film and maximum stress of that polymer film.

26. A method of claim 24, further comprising determining an upper limit value and a lower limit value of the optimal weight percentage, wherein the upper limit value is a maximum weight percentage of the first weight percentage and the second weight percentage plus a first predetermined percentage; andwherein the lower limit value is a minimum weight percentage of the first weight percentage and the second weight percentage minus a second predetermined percentage.

27. The method of claim 26, wherein each of the first and second predetermined percentages is about 0%-10%.

28. The method of claim 24, wherein the optimal weight percentage is chosen from a range of an average of the first weight percentage and the second weight percentage plus/minus a third predetermined percentage.

29. The method of claim 8, wherein the third predetermined percentages is about 0%-10%.

30. The method of claim 24, wherein the optimal weight percentage of the tissue forming nanoparticles in the polymer is about 20%.