The present invention relates to bags and, more particularly, to sterile sampling bags for use in handling sample materials and the like (such as clinical samples), for instance in laboratories, in hospitals, in the food industry, etc.
Sterile sampling bags are used to collect, contain and carry a variety of sample materials that are pertinent to the agro-food, pharmaceutical, medical and environmental industries. These industries are all subject to various regulatory bodies, such as the FDA in the United States of America, Health Canada, HCAPP, etc. These regulators ensure that all products intended for consumption or interaction with the general public (either directly, such as food products, or indirectly, such as chemical fertilizers), meet scientific and measured standards that confirm their safety.
In order for a sampling bag to be viable for these industries, the following specifications should be met:
In order to better understand these requirements, the following is a typical description of a field application for the use of a sampling bag.
At varying and predetermined intervals during any given food production process, samples of the food matter will be collected using sanitary methods and by inserting the substance in a sterile sampling bag. This occurs at many stages of the process, from the raw material phase, throughout the process and again with the final product. Furthermore, work surfaces, production and handling machinery and packaging materials are also sampled for testing. Essentially, these components are all being tested to ensure that no harmful pathogens (such as E. coli, Listeria, Salmonella) or chemicals are present. Typically, various nutritive solutions are added to the sample substance and it is then transported to a laboratory for incubation and subsequent microbial analysis. The sampled material can be retained in a sampling bag for a wide variety of time periods. Usually, this consists of a few days, however, in some cases the sample can be retained for months, such as in a freezer environment.
Such sampling bags are typically made of plastics material and thus constitute a significant concern, when discarded, for the environment.
Therefore, there is a need for a sampling bag that is friendlier to the environment.
It is therefore an aim of the present invention to provide a biodegradable sampling bag that will respect a sufficient number of the aforementioned criteria, depending on the intended use of the bag.
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a biodegradable sampling bag for containing samples or the like, comprising a flexible enclosure defining a chamber adapted to contain therein the sample, said flexible enclosure being made of a plastic material, said plastic material containing an additive that renders said flexible enclosure biodegradable when exposed for a sufficient period of time to microbial action.
Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method of making a biodegradable sampling bag, comprising the steps of: a) producing a flexible enclosure from a plastic material containing an additive that renders said flexible enclosure biodegradable when exposed for a sufficient period of time to microbial action; and b) making a bag from said flexible enclosure, said bag defining a chamber adapted to contain therein a sample.
Further in accordance with the present invention, there is provided for the use of a plastic material containing an additive for making a biodegradable sampling bag, wherein the plastic material containing said additive is adapted to enable microorganisms to metabolize the molecular structure of said sampling bag and cause said sampling bag to biodegrade, but being adapted, when exposed to microbial action, to sustain biodegradation for a given period of time.
Other objects, advantages and features of the present invention will become more apparent upon reading of the following non-restrictive description of embodiments thereof, given by way of example only.
The drawings included herewith are for illustrating various examples of articles, methods, and apparatuses of the present specification. In the drawings:
The sampling bag of the present invention, such as the sampling bag B shown in
The present sampling bag has a similar five year shelf life as conventional bags. The biodegradation of the plastic is not triggered by heat, light, or moisture. Furthermore, the sampling bag was submitted to 20 weeks of intense exposure to laboratory conditions (inoculation with various fungi, moisture, bacteria) and remained physically and chemically intact. The sampling bag is sterile and is also R-Nase, D-Nase and pyrogen free.
The additive technology does not activate until the sampling bag is disposed of in a compost or sewage environment. Biodegradation under these conditions occurs over a period of, for instance, nine months to five years, depending on the concentration of microorganisms in the disposal environment.
Biodegradable Plastic Technology and the Sampling Bag Challenge
Plastic materials and polymers are rendered biodegradable through the addition of substances that impact their molecular structures. The goal is to sufficiently weaken or interrupt their polymer chains in order to allow environmental factors to interact with them for eventual degradation. Unadulterated polymer chains do not otherwise lose their molecular structure, and therefore are believed to remain intact within our ecological systems (landfills, sewage, general environment) for indefinite periods.
The very concept of attempting to produce/develop a biodegradable sampling bag is counterintuitive to the requirements of the scientific community and stability that the bag must possess (see list of aforementioned specifications).
Beyond the characteristics required of a sampling bag, during the course of its useful life, the bag will be subjected to a wide variety of materials, liquids and ambient conditions. These sampling bags are used by the scientific community, a group that is extremely knowledgeable and, understandably, not prone to modifications of proven tools and methodology. Analytical results, scientific validations and public security are reliant on the integrity of the entire testing process, including the sterile sampling container.
The Technological Challenges
Most current biodegrading catalyst agents known today are cellulose-based and many are heat and/or light activated. One known agent enables bacterial interaction. This summary will examine all three as to their potential application for the production of biodegradable sampling bags.
1) Cellulose is a plant-derived base, therefore of organic origin. This technology causes two factors that make it inappropriate for consideration when searching for a method to produce biodegradable sampling bags:
2) Heat and Light activated additives present a particular challenge and are also inappropriate:
3) Bacteria Enabling Catalyst:
In the present invention, Applicant has identified a biodegradable additive produced by Biofilms, commercialized under the name MasterBatch Pellets™, which enables microorganisms in the environment to metabolize the molecular structure of plastic products. The plastic degrades through the action of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, and is not rendered unstable by light or heat. The plastic, in this case Linear Low-Density Polyethylene (LLDPE) remains stable, pliable and sufficiently transparent for the sampling bag application.
However, this additive also bears a potential challenge and is very counterintuitive to being viable for the microbiological analyses industry, in that sampling bags are used to enhance and encourage the growth of bacteria and other microorganisms, in order to detect their presence; and if the plastic material of the bag begins to degrade when in contact with such active bacteria, how can a sampling bag provided with the aforementioned biodegradable additive be considered as even remotely viable for this application?
The Solution
The ECM Biofilms biodegrading additive is the more promising of these types of additives on the market; however, two inherent questions had to be answered in order for the product technology to be applicable for a sampling bag application:
Proofing Methodology and Outcomes
Applicant obtained biodegradable LLDPE tubing produced with the ECM Biofilms additive.
Physical Validation:
Applicant's production team applied this raw material to its conventional production process with the following results:
Scientific Validation of the Physical Attributes
Base Testing:
First, Applicant's standard, FDA approved, non-biodegradable LLDPE film was subjected to a series of physical and chemical tests to confirm various measurements as a control test against which to measure and control the same attributes for the new biodegradable film of the present invention.
Next, the biodegradable LLDPE film was subjected to the same physical, chemical and biological testing, in order to obtain its baseline physical measurements.
Base Test Results of the biodegradable film:
Testing of Product Viability and Integrity (under market conditions and applications):
The additive used to render the LLDPE film biodegradable, enables microorganisms to digest and break down plastic molecular structures. Applicant's sterile sampling bags are used to gather food, water, and other substances, and to actually incubate them in order to allow any present microorganisms to multiply and form colonies. Samples and related substances can remain in the bag from periods of a few hours to a few months.
ECM Biofilms states that products manufactured with their biodegrading catalyst remain stable and have similar shelf lives to their non-biodegradable counterparts. They also claim that the treated material will biodegrade in nine months to five years (depending on the plastic polymer, its thickness, and the composting, sewage, or disposal environment conditions where microorganisms are present). Applicant needed to ensure that the sampling bags would retain their physical integrity for the useful life thereof, i.e. from the moment a sample is inserted inside, to the time of disposal, which is usually less than three days but which could, however, range up to a few months.
Product (sampling bags) samples of the present invention were submitted to three consecutive months of exposure to microorganisms, molds and fungi, and, once a month, some pieces were submitted to physical testing in order to measure tensile strength, MVTR (Moisture Vapor Transmission Rate) and OTR (Oxygen Transmission Rate). All testing was performed by outside firms.
The results of the physical tests at the end of each month have confirmed that the biodegradable plastic material of the present invention remains physically unchanged when exposed to laboratory-like applications and microorganisms for a minimum period of three months.
In light of these confirmed results, Applicant considers that the present biodegradable Low Density Polyethylene has been scientifically validated, that it meets market and scientific requirements, and that it can be used for at least three months without any degradation.
Although the present invention has been described hereinabove by way of embodiments thereof, it may be modified, without departing from the nature and teachings of the subject invention as described herein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2680970 | Sep 2009 | CA | national |
The present application is a continuation application of U.S. Ser. No. 15/357,488 filed on Nov. 21, 2016, that is a continuation application of U.S. Ser. No. 14/522,229 filed on Oct. 23, 2014, that is a continuation application of U.S. Ser. No. 13/498,812 filed on Sep. 11, 2012, that is a 371 national stage entry of international application PCT/CA2010/001533 filed on Sep. 28, 2010, that claims priority to Canadian Patent Application No. 2,680,970 filed on Sep. 28, 2009. These documents are all hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
D192696 | Saxe | May 1962 | S |
3098594 | Williamson | Jul 1963 | A |
3229876 | Osborn, Jr. | Jan 1966 | A |
3237826 | Ringholz et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3477624 | Branyon et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3698548 | Stenzel et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3782650 | Donnell, Jr. | Jan 1974 | A |
3826361 | Heckrodt | Jul 1974 | A |
3979019 | Bliss | Sep 1976 | A |
3979050 | Cilia | Sep 1976 | A |
4341410 | Summach | Jul 1982 | A |
4453649 | Origuchi | Jun 1984 | A |
4645108 | Gavin et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4714643 | Kuenzel | Dec 1987 | A |
4805800 | Nocek et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4850486 | Neibaur | Jul 1989 | A |
4904092 | Campbell et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5046619 | Hwang | Sep 1991 | A |
5167377 | Chalmers | Dec 1992 | A |
5170957 | Carpenter | Dec 1992 | A |
5183157 | Darden | Feb 1993 | A |
5219424 | Simhaee | Jun 1993 | A |
5228632 | Addison et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5509570 | DeMatteis | Apr 1996 | A |
5564829 | Lafond | Oct 1996 | A |
5590784 | Daniels | Jan 1997 | A |
5752666 | Simhaee | May 1998 | A |
6079563 | Katchmazenski | Jun 2000 | A |
6135281 | Simhaee | Oct 2000 | A |
6283405 | Tracy | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6439502 | Gemmell et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
D467454 | Le et al. | Dec 2002 | S |
6488222 | West et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
D472413 | Haas | Apr 2003 | S |
6564829 | Arisato | May 2003 | B2 |
6575301 | Simhaee | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6635002 | Yeh | Oct 2003 | B1 |
D504812 | Keberlein et al. | May 2005 | S |
6945695 | Rabiea | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6976563 | Shaw | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7252194 | Tracy | Aug 2007 | B2 |
D590126 | Kovich et al. | Apr 2009 | S |
7984844 | Jones | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8104657 | Barella | Jan 2012 | B2 |
D683245 | Palmer et al. | May 2013 | S |
8960494 | Gluck | Feb 2015 | B1 |
D735488 | Page et al. | Aug 2015 | S |
D785362 | Trunsky | May 2017 | S |
D787321 | Pantelleria | May 2017 | S |
20030136793 | Chen | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20050194415 | Danechi | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050274638 | Smith | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060151660 | Stringer | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060163419 | Horn | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060169829 | Slocum et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080103232 | Lake | May 2008 | A1 |
20080187254 | Hall | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080272016 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090127276 | Rippl et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100258580 | Decker et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20140263532 | Licata | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150196174 | Goltz et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150250364 | Yamada | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160107790 | Maddox, Jr. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Robert Leaversuch, “Additive Masterbatches Make Polyolefins Degrade”, Plastics Technology, Oct. 2002. |
Robert Sinclair, “Additive Technology for Polyolefin Biodegradation” presented at 2004 PLACE conference, TAPPU, URL:http://www.tappi.org/content/enewsletters/eplace/2004/02-2Sinclair.pdf. (The year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date so that the particular month of publication is not an issue.). |
ECM BioFilms, Inc., “ECM MasterBatch Pellets ECM6.0701”, Material Safety Data Sheet, Validation Date: Jul. 10, 2007. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200158601 A1 | May 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15357488 | Nov 2016 | US |
Child | 16658736 | US | |
Parent | 14522229 | Oct 2014 | US |
Child | 15357488 | US | |
Parent | 13498812 | US | |
Child | 14522229 | US |