Biofunctional materials

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12139701
  • Patent Number
    12,139,701
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, January 23, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 12, 2024
    10 days ago
Abstract
Provided are methods and compositions for self-cleaning that include a digestive protein capable of decomposing stain forming molecules, a substrate applied to a solid surface, and a linker moiety bound to an outer surface of said substrate and an active group of said digestive protein, said linker moiety between said protein and said substrate and covalently linking said protein to a surface of said substrate by an amide bond, the linker moiety between a free amine of said protein and said outer surface of said substrate wherein the digestive protein forms a layer on a surface of said substrate such that the digestive protein is surface exposed for reaction with a stain.
Description
FIELD

The present disclosure relates to self-cleaning compositions and a process for preventing and reducing surface stain accumulation due to bird droppings, bug wastes, food debris, and other stain causing materials.


TECHNICAL BACKGROUND

Both interior and exterior surfaces of automobile, such as coatings, paints, and seat fabrics, are subject to contamination and corrosions when they are under prolonged exposure to bird dropping, insect debris, resins of conifer, microbes, gums, etc. Certain stains, such as insect-originated stains, are hard to remove with regular automatic brush-free washing. Interior surfaces and coatings may also be easily get stained with oil, protein, sugar and other ingredients in foods and beverages, and timely removal of such stains may present certain challenges.


Here, the present invention specifically involves the incorporation of digestive proteins including lysozymes, proteases, lipases, cellulases, etc., onto surfaces such as paints and coatings. The catalytic activity of the digestive proteins enables ongoing self-cleaning to reduce and eliminate stain contaminations. The mechanism of action of these digestive proteins is mainly enzymatic in nature and does not involve the use of any corrosive or oxidative components; therefore, they are environmentally friendly.


Stains of interests in the initial stage of this work include those formed from broken bodies of bugs, animal (like bird) wastes, foods, milk and other beverages, and cosmetic and personal care products. Although the detailed components vary with sources of stains, the major components of stains that are adhesive to surfaces are proteins, polysaccharides, fats or oils.


DESCRIPTION OF RELATED ART

It is known to incorporate enzymes into coating or into substrates for the purpose of providing a surface with antimicrobial, antifungal or antifouling properties. Yet it is novel to the best knowledge of Applicants to attach digestive proteins to a surface for the purpose of enzymatically decomposing stain molecules in contact with the surface.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,818,212 discloses an enzymatic antimicrobial ingredient for disinfection and for killing microbial cells.


Wang et al. 2001 discloses lifespan extension of an enzyme upon its covalent binding at wet conditions; yet the reference does not seem to mention the utilization of such covalently bound enzyme in the area of surface self-cleaning.


U.S. Pat. No. 3,705,398 discloses polymeric articles having active antibacterial, antifungal and combinations of antibacterial and antifungal properties. The antibacterial and antifungal activating agents are distributed within the polymeric composition and migrate to the surface.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,914,367 discloses a method of preparing a polymer-protein composite including polymerizing a monomer in the presence of a protein dissolved in an organic phase via the ion-pairing of the protein with a surfactant. This reference, however, does not seem to mention the prevention or reduction of stain accumulation using the digestive power of such a polymer-protein composite.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,150,146 discloses a method of releasing a compound having antimicrobial activity from a matrix at a controlled rate. The method includes an enzyme and a substrate within the matrix beforehand to allow the enzyme and substrate to react with each other in the matrix, thereby to produce a compound having antimicrobial activity. The patent also discloses a coating composition comprising a film-forming resin, an enzyme, a substrate and any enzyme capable of reacting with the substrate.


U.S. 2005/0058689 discloses paints and coatings having antifungal growth and antibacterial materials. Specific chemicals and formations are disclosed for incorporation into painted surfaces which are antifungal compositions to inhibit growth of mold, bacterial, and fungi on building materials.


The object of the present invention is to provide self-cleaning composition and process containing digestive proteins for preventing and reducing stain accumulation.


SUMMARY

The following summary of the invention is provided to facilitate an understanding of some of the innovative features unique to the present invention and is not intended to be a full description. A full appreciation of the various aspects of the invention can be gained by taking the entire specification, claims, drawings, and abstract as a whole.


Provided are compositions for self-cleaning of a stain that include a substrate, a digestive protein capable of decomposing a stain molecule, and a linker moiety between the substrate and the digestive protein, where the linkage is or is between a free amine on the digestive protein and the substrate.


The compositions as provided herein may be useful as a mechanism to prevent the accumulation of contacting stains and dirt by an “automatic” enzymatic degradation reaction. The digestive proteins of the composition may include proteases which hydrolyze protein molecules, lipases which hydrolyze lipids and fats, cellulases which hydrolyze cellulose, and amylases which hydrolyze carbohydrates, etc. It is neither required nor necessary for the digestive proteins to have their functional binding pockets all facing towards stain particles. A layer of digestive proteins delivers enough coverage and digesting activity even though the digestive proteins may be randomly arranged on a surface.


Optionally, a surface may be pretreated with a layer of polymer comprising one or more active groups. A digestive protein suspension may be spin coated onto the polymer layer with the active groups to form covalent bonds between the proteins and the polymer layer. The active groups may comprise alcohol, thiol, aldehyde, carboxylic acid, anhydride, epoxy, and ester, etc. Alternatively, digestive proteins may be attached to nanoparticles before their suspension with paints or coatings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

The present invention is further illustrated by reference to the accompanying drawings, in which



FIG. 1 is a depiction of an attachment of enzymes to the surface of polymeric nanoparticles.



FIG. 2 is a depiction of fluorescence images of protease coating prepared via adsorption and covalent cross-linking.



FIG. 3 shows a protein assay calibration curve.



FIG. 4 shows a calibration curve for tyrosine (product of hydrolysis).



FIG. 5 shows a representative GPC chromatograph indicating egg white stain degradation.



FIG. 6 shows the time course of egg white stain degradation.



FIG. 7 shows thermal stability of protease coating at 80° C.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure relates to, in a first aspect, a composition comprising a substrate, a digestive protein capable of decomposing a stain molecule, and a linker moiety.


This disclosure specifically involves the incorporation of one or more digestive proteins including lysozymes, proteases, lipases, cellulases, etc., onto surfaces such as paints and coatings. The catalytic activity of the digestive proteins enables ongoing self-cleaning to reduce and eliminate stain contaminations.


Various stains include those formed from broken bodies of bugs, animal (such as bird) wastes, foods, milk and other beverages, and cosmetic and personal care products. Although the detailed components vary with sources of stains, the major components of stains that are adhesive to surfaces are proteins, polysaccharides, fats or oils.


The activity of the digestive proteins toward different stain sources may be evaluated in a solution environment. Tests are conducted at different conditions including different pH and temperature, in an attempt to evaluate the proteins' performance in an automobile environment instead of that in a washer machine as they have been traditionally applied. Tests include: protein-related activity; starch-related activity tests; tests with oily stains. Protein activity unit is defined as: one unit of digestive protein hydrolyzes casein to produce absorbance difference equivalent to 1.0 μmol of tyrosine per minute at 37° C. under the conditions of the assay. Results of activity assay show covalent cross-linked protease present an activity that is nine times more than that of a physically absorbed protease.


There are several ways to incorporate the digestive proteins onto a substrate. One of which involves the application of covalent bonds. Specifically, free amine groups of the digestive proteins may be covalently bound to an active group of the substrate. Such active groups include alcohol, thiol, aldehyde, carboxylic acid, anhydride, epoxy, ester, or any combination thereof. This method of incorporating digestive proteins delivers unique advantages. First, the covalent bonds tether the proteins permanently to the substrate and thus place them as an integral part of the final composition with much less, if not at all, leakage of digestive protein species. Second, the covalent bonds provide for extended enzyme lifetime. Over time, proteins typically lose activity because of the unfolding of their polypeptide chains. Chemical binding such as covalent bonding effectively restricts such unfolding, and thus improves the protein life. The life of a protein is typically determined by comparing the amount of activity reduction of a protein that is free or being physically adsorbed with that of a protein covalently-immobilized over a period of time. Results have shown that a protein that is in free form or being physically adsorbed to a substrate loses its activity much faster that a protein in covalent-bond form.


Alternatively, digestive proteins may be uniformly dispersed throughout the substrate network to create a homogenous protein platform. In so doing, digestive proteins may be first modified with polymerizable groups. The modified proteins may be solubilized into organic solvents in the presence of surfactant, and thus engage the subsequent polymerization with monomers such as methyl methacrylate (MMA) or styrene in the organic solution. The resulted composition includes digestive protein molecules homogeneously dispersed throughout the network.


Also, digestive proteins may be attached to surfaces of a substrate in comparison to the above mentioned cross-linking methods. An attachment of digestive proteins corresponding to ˜100% surface coverage was achieved with polystyrene particles with diameters range from 100 to 1000 nm.


The digestive proteins of the composition may include proteases which hydrolyze protein molecules, lipases which hydrolyze lipids and fats, cellulases which hydrolyze cellulose, and amylases which hydrolyze carbohydrates. It is neither required nor necessary for the digestive proteins to have their functional binding pockets all facing toward stain particles. A layer of digestive proteins delivers enough coverage and digesting activity even though the digestive proteins may be randomly arranged on a surface.


Optionally, a surface is pretreated with a layer of polymer comprising one or more surface active groups of succinimide ester. A digestive protein suspension is spin coated onto the layer of the polymer with the active groups to form covalent bonds with the proteins. Alternatively, digestive proteins may be attached to nanoparticles before their suspension with paints or coatings.


This disclosure is further directed to a composition comprising a digestive protein capable of decomposing a stain molecule, and a coating substrate wherein the digestive protein may be entrapped in the coating substrate. In this composition, the digestive protein may be selected from lysozymes, proteases, lipases, cellulases, glycosidases, and amylases.


In another aspect of this disclosure, a process is disclosed for reducing and or eliminating stain contaminations. The process comprises binding a substrate to a surface and forming a linker moiety between an active group of a digestive protein and the substrate. In this process, the substrate may comprise surface active groups such as alcohol, thiol, aldehyde, carboxylic acid, anhydride, epoxy, ester, and any combinations thereof.


Example 1

Enzymes may be attached to surfaces of plastics. An enzyme attachment corresponding to ˜100% surface coverage may be achieved with polystyrene particles with diameters range from 100 to 1000 nm. By coating with digestive protein, these particles may be used along with paints or coatings to functionalize the surfaces of materials. The same chemical bonding approach may be applied to coat enzymes onto preformed plastic parts, and thus form a protein coating on the parts' surfaces. As shown in FIG. 1, particles with diameters ranging from 100 nm to 1000 nm may be synthesized by emulsion polymerization. Emulsion polymerization is a type of polymerization that takes place in an emulsion typically incorporating water, monomer, and surfactant. The most common type of emulsion polymerization is an oil-in-water emulsion, in which droplets of monomer (the oil) are emulsified (with surfactants) in a continuous phase of water.


Particles as previously described may be synthesized by mixing an aqueous solution (mixture of water and ethanol, ˜20 ml), containing a polymerizable surfactant (2-sulfoethylmethacrylate), a stabilizer (polyvinylpyrrolidone, PVP) and an initiator (2,2′-Azobis [2-methyl-N-(2-hydroxyethyl) propionamide]), will be mixed with an organic solution (˜1 ml) of styrene, N-acryloxysuccinimide (NAS, a functionalized vinyl monomer), and divinyl benzene (˜1% v/v). The particle size may be controlled by adjusting phase ratio (1/30˜1/15, oil/aqueous) and the concentration of ethanol (0.125˜0.50 ml/ml), 2-sulfoethyl methacrylate and PVP (0˜5.5 mg/ml). The reaction may be performed with stirring at 70° C. for 10 h, followed by washing the resulted particles with ethanol and DI water in a stirred ultrafiltration cell with a polyethersulfone membrane (cut off MW: 300 kDa).


Example 2

Stains may be generated from different sources of contacts. Body residues of bugs, animal wastes, food, milk and other beverages, and cosmetic and personal care products may all cause stains. Although the detailed components vary with sources of stains, the major components that are adhesive to surfaces are proteins, simple sugars and polysaccharides, fats and/or oils. Digestive proteins including lipases, proteases, amylase and cellulose, each of them attacks different components, are thus far the most effective, safe and economic agents to fight against such stains. As shown below in Table 1, these proteins were examined and tested in our initial screening tests, and eventually we selected protease to proceed for the majority of the subsequent experiments due to the easiness in activity measurement.













TABLE 1






Targeting


Standard testing


Enzyme
Stains
Source
Functions
conditions







Proteases
Bugs, dairy

Bacillus

Hydrolysis of
Casein with Folin &



products, animal

licheniformis

proteinaceous
Ciocalteu's Phenol



wastes
(Subtilisin Carlsberg)
materials
dye, pH 7.5, 37° C.,






absorbance at 660 nm


Lipase
Fats and oils,

Pseudomonas

Hydrolysis of
p-nitro phenyl


AK
cosmetics, inks

fluorescens

oils and fats
valerate, pH 7.7,






40° C., absorbance at






405 nm


α-
Juices, soft

Bacillus subtilis

Hydrolysis of
Dyed Starch, pH 6.9,


Amylase
drinks, foods,

starch
25° C., absorbance at



animal wastes


540 nm


Cellulase
Beverages,

Aspergillus niger

Hydrolysis of
Dyed cellulose, pH



foods, animal

cellulose
6, 50° C., absorbance



wastes,


at 590 nm









Example 3
Preparation of Enzyme Coating

N-acryloxy succinimide (392 mg), 1.2 ml of styrene and 29.2 mg of 4,4′-azobis-(4-cyanovaleric acid) were mixed with 16 ml of chloroform in a 20 ml glass reaction vial. The vial was purged with nitrogen, sealed and incubated at 70° C. for 12 hrs with stirring, followed by the removal of solvent by purging nitrogen. The polymer product was re-dissolved in chloroform at a concentration of 50 mg/ml. One milliliter of the resulting solution was spin-coated onto a polystyrene plate (11 cm in diameter) at 6000 rpm. Protease from Subtilisin Carlsberg was dissolved in 0.05 M phosphate buffer at a concentration of 10 mg/ml. The enzyme was applied onto the active polymer coated plate via 3-step layer-by-layer spin coating: 1) 1 ml of the protease solution, 2) 1 ml of protease solution containing 0.5% (V/V) of glutaraldehyde, 3) 1 ml of protease solution. The spin-coated plates were kept at 4° C. for 12 h, followed by extensive washing with 0.05 M Tris buffer (pH 8), 2M NaCl solution and DI water. Finally the plates were air-dried and cut into small pieces (1×2 cm). This method was designated as covalent cross-linking. As a comparison, similar procedure was applied on a polystyrene plate without the active polymer coating, which was called as physical adsorption.


Example 4
Visualization of Enzyme Coating

Fluorescent dye (Oregon green, Invitrogen Corp.) was first dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide at a concentration of 2 mg/ml. The sample plates with physically adsorbed and covalently immobilized enzyme were incubated in the dye solution at room temperature with gentle shaking for 2 hours, followed by rinsing with DI water. The plates were then dried in nitrogen and observed under a fluorescence microscope. The images are shown in FIG. 2, where green color denotes the area covered with enzyme. Compared with physical adsorption, much more enzyme was immobilized on the surface using covalent cross-linking method.


Example 5
Determination of Enzyme Loading

The amount of enzyme attached to the plastic plate was determined by a reversed Bradford method. Typically, a working solution was first prepared by diluting Bradford reagent with DI water (1:5, by volume). A calibration curve was first obtained using free protease as the standards. In a 1 ml cuvette, 0.5 ml of protease solution was mixed with 0.5 ml of the working solution and then allowed to react for 5 min. The absorbance of the solution was measured at 465 nm on a spectrophotometer. After testing a series of different protease concentrations, a calibration curve was obtained as shown in FIG. 3.


To determine the loading of immobilized enzyme, a piece of enzyme-coated plate (1 cm×2 cm) was placed into a 20-ml glass vial, followed by the addition of 0.5 ml of DI water and 0.5 ml of the working solution. The vial was slightly agitated for 5 min at room temperature to allow binding of the dye to the immobilized enzyme. The absorbance of the supernatants was then recorded at 465 nm. Similarly a blank plastic plate without enzyme coating was also measured as the control. The reading obtained with the blank plate was subtracted from the reading obtained from the enzyme loaded plate. Comparing the obtained reading difference with the calibration curve gave the loading on the plate, which was then normalized into a unit of μg/cm2. The enzyme loading by covalent cross-linking and physical adsorption were 8.5 and 1.0 μg/cm2, respectively.


Example 6
Verification of the Proteolytic Activity of Enzyme Coating

Enzyme in solution: The proteolytic activity of protease was determined using 0.65% (w/v) casein as the substrate. Protease solution (0.1 ml) was incubated with 0.5 ml of casein solution for 10 min at 37° C. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 0.5 ml of tricholoroacetic acid (110 mM). The mixture was centrifuged to remove the precipitation. The resulting supernatant (0.4 ml) was mixed with 1 ml of sodium carbonate (0.5 M) and 0.2 ml of diluted Folin & Ciocalteu's phenol reagent (1:4 by diluting Folin & Ciocalteu's phenol reagent with DI water), followed by incubation at 37° C. for 30 min. Finally the mixture was centrifuged again and the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 660 nm on a spectrophotometer. Blank experiment was performed without enzyme solution by adding 100 μl of buffer and carrying out similar test. The absorbance of the blank was subtracted from the sample (enzyme solution).


The activity unit was defined as: one unit of enzyme hydrolyzes casein to produce absorbance difference equivalent to 1.0 μmol of tyrosine per minute at 37° C. under the conditions of the assay. Tyrosine amino acid was used for calibration. Various concentrations of tyrosine were reacted with Folin-Ciocalteau reagent and the resulting calibration curve is shown in FIG. 4.


Enzyme coating: The activity of the immobilized protease was determined in a similar manner by using an enzyme coated polymer piece (1×2 cm) instead of enzyme in solution and a blank polymer coated piece as control. The activity of protein was termed as surface activity per unit area.


Results of activity assay showed that plates with covalent cross-linked protease afford 5.6×10−3 unit/cm2, while physical adsorbed enzyme only displayed an activity of 0.6×10−3 unit/cm2.


Example 7
Stain Degradation on Enzyme Coating

Egg white was used as the model stain to determine the stain degradation on enzyme coating. Onto a plate (11 cm in diameter) with protease-coating, 2 ml of egg white solution (10 mg/ml in DI water) was spin-coated at 2000 rpm. The plate was then cut into smaller pieces (1×2 cm) and kept at room temperature (25° C.) for various period of time to allow the degradation of egg white. After certain intervals, one small plate was carefully washed with DI water and the egg white in the washing solution was analyzed using gel permeation chromatography (GPC) to determine the molecular weight changes. Typically two peaks were found in the GPC chromatograph (FIG. 5): one has shorter retention time and the other has longer retention time, corresponding to the egg white and degradation products, respectively. Based on the area of the egg white peaks, a time course of egg white degradation was obtained as shown in FIG. 6. Control experiments were also performed using plates without protease coating, but no clear product peaks were identified.


Example 8
Thermal Stability of the Enzyme Coating

Thermal stability of the enzyme coating was studied at 80° C. in an air-heating oven. At certain time intervals, the sample plate(s) were taken out of the oven and the activity were measured following the procedure as described in Working Example 2. The decrease of activity with time was plotted in FIG. 9. It appeared that covalent cross-linked enzyme afforded better stability against thermal inactivation, as compared to physical adsorbed enzyme.


Various modifications of the present invention, in addition to those shown and described herein, will be apparent to those skilled in the art of the above description. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.


It is appreciated that all reagents are obtainable by sources known in the art unless otherwise specified or synthesized by one of ordinary skill in the art without undue experimentation.


Patents and publications mentioned in the specification are indicative of the levels of those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains. These patents and publications are incorporated herein by reference to the same extent as if each individual application or publication was specifically and individually incorporated herein by reference.


The foregoing description is illustrative of particular embodiments of the invention, but is not meant to be a limitation upon the practice thereof. The following claims, including all equivalents thereof, are intended to define the scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A composition for removing stains from a solid surface comprising: a digestive protein capable of decomposing stain forming molecules;a substrate applied to the solid surface; anda linker moiety bound to an outer surface of said substrate and an active group of said digestive protein, said linker moiety between said protein and said substrate and covalently linking said protein to a surface of said substrate by an amide bond, the linker moiety between a free amine of said protein and said outer surface of said substrate;said digestive protein forming a layer on a surface of said substrate such that the digestive protein is surface exposed for reaction with a stain.
  • 2. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the digestive protein comprises a lysozyme, protease, lipase, cellulase, glycosidase, or amylase.
  • 3. The composition according to claim 1 wherein said free amine is in a lysine, arginine, asparagine, glutamine, or an N-terminal end.
  • 4. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the digestive protein comprises a lipase.
  • 5. The composition according to claim 1, wherein said substrate comprises paint or polymers.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/790,846 filed Oct. 23, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/562,503 filed Nov. 22, 2006, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (172)
Number Name Date Kind
3220928 Brenner Nov 1965 A
3519538 Messing et al. Jul 1970 A
3672955 Stanley et al. Jun 1972 A
3705938 Hyman Dec 1972 A
3857934 Bernstein et al. Dec 1974 A
3935862 Kraskin Feb 1976 A
3957974 Hata May 1976 A
4016043 Schuurs et al. Apr 1977 A
4026814 Johnson et al. May 1977 A
4034078 Van Horn Jul 1977 A
4094744 Hartdegen et al. Jun 1978 A
4098645 Hartdegen et al. Jul 1978 A
4128686 Kyle et al. Dec 1978 A
4195127 Hartdegen et al. Mar 1980 A
4195128 Hildebrand et al. Mar 1980 A
4195129 Fukui et al. Mar 1980 A
4229536 DeFilippi Oct 1980 A
4237591 Ginocchio Dec 1980 A
4297137 Sachetto et al. Oct 1981 A
4315828 Church Feb 1982 A
4322308 Hooper et al. Mar 1982 A
4385632 Odelhog May 1983 A
4539982 Bailly Sep 1985 A
4551187 Church et al. Nov 1985 A
4552813 Grams Nov 1985 A
4897352 Chonde et al. Jan 1990 A
4910234 Yamamori et al. Mar 1990 A
5112602 Miki et al. May 1992 A
5279955 Pegg et al. Jan 1994 A
5405766 Kallury et al. Apr 1995 A
5418146 Joo et al. May 1995 A
5420179 Fourquier et al. May 1995 A
5492821 Callstrom et al. Feb 1996 A
5496710 Nagao et al. Mar 1996 A
5508185 Kawamura et al. Apr 1996 A
5514671 Lyon et al. May 1996 A
5523027 Otsuka Jun 1996 A
5543309 Pischel Aug 1996 A
5559163 Dawson et al. Sep 1996 A
5593398 Weimer Jan 1997 A
5595728 Brockett et al. Jan 1997 A
5631343 Binns et al. May 1997 A
5643559 Eigen et al. Jul 1997 A
5719039 Dordick et al. Feb 1998 A
5728544 Tanaka et al. Mar 1998 A
5739004 Woodson Apr 1998 A
5739023 Harada et al. Apr 1998 A
5770188 Hamade et al. Jun 1998 A
5800804 Laney Sep 1998 A
5801140 Langley et al. Sep 1998 A
5817300 Cook et al. Oct 1998 A
5837483 Hirata Nov 1998 A
5868720 Van Antwerp Feb 1999 A
5876802 Brunnemann et al. Mar 1999 A
5912408 Trinh et al. Jun 1999 A
5914367 Dordick et al. Jun 1999 A
5919689 Selvig et al. Jul 1999 A
5942435 Wheeler Aug 1999 A
H1818 Potgieter et al. Nov 1999 H
5981743 Gross et al. Nov 1999 A
5998200 Bonaventura et al. Dec 1999 A
5998512 Schloman Dec 1999 A
6030933 Herbots et al. Feb 2000 A
6060043 Hayden et al. May 2000 A
6080391 Tsuchiya et al. Jun 2000 A
6107392 Antonelli et al. Aug 2000 A
6150146 Hamade et al. Nov 2000 A
6265191 Mizusawa et al. Jul 2001 B1
6291582 Dordick et al. Sep 2001 B1
6303290 Liu et al. Oct 2001 B1
6342386 Powers et al. Jan 2002 B1
6472493 Huynh-Ba Oct 2002 B1
6599627 Yeo et al. Jul 2003 B2
6638526 Deussen et al. Oct 2003 B1
6663949 Tanaka et al. Dec 2003 B1
6713660 Roe et al. Mar 2004 B1
6759220 LeJeune et al. Jul 2004 B1
6818212 Johansen et al. Nov 2004 B2
6844028 Mao et al. Jan 2005 B2
6855746 Yoshitake et al. Feb 2005 B2
6875456 Delest et al. Apr 2005 B2
6881711 Gershun et al. Apr 2005 B1
6905733 Russell et al. Jun 2005 B2
7164037 Dietsche et al. Jan 2007 B2
7211275 Ying May 2007 B2
7335400 Russell et al. Feb 2008 B2
7632793 Lang Dec 2009 B2
7687554 Schellenberg et al. Mar 2010 B2
7932230 McDaniel Apr 2011 B2
7939500 McDaniel May 2011 B2
8008180 Takahashi et al. Aug 2011 B2
8011381 Newman et al. Sep 2011 B2
8011938 Martin et al. Sep 2011 B2
8222015 Wang et al. Jul 2012 B2
8252571 Wang et al. Aug 2012 B2
8311297 Du et al. Nov 2012 B2
8324295 Jia et al. Dec 2012 B2
8388904 McDaniel et al. Mar 2013 B1
8394618 Buthe et al. Mar 2013 B2
8497248 McDaniel Jul 2013 B2
8618066 McDaniel Dec 2013 B1
8796009 Jia et al. Aug 2014 B2
8932717 Lee et al. Jan 2015 B2
9012196 Buthe et al. Apr 2015 B2
9121016 Jia et al. Sep 2015 B2
9193873 Wang et al. Nov 2015 B2
9388370 Wu et al. Jul 2016 B2
9428740 Buthe et al. Aug 2016 B2
9828597 Wang et al. Nov 2017 B2
20020019615 Roe et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020192366 Cramer et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030089381 Manning, Jr. May 2003 A1
20030096383 Shimizu et al. May 2003 A1
20030161789 Ermantraut et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030166237 Allermann et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040009159 Polsenski et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040063831 Sheppard et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040067279 Delest et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040108608 Ju et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040109853 McDaniel Jun 2004 A1
20040175407 McDaniel Sep 2004 A1
20040241497 Sasaki et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040242831 Tian et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040259746 Warren et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050049166 Huang Mar 2005 A1
20050058689 McDaniel Mar 2005 A1
20050059128 Arnold et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050079594 Marion Apr 2005 A1
20050147579 Schneider et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050176905 Moon et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050255078 Sakamoto et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050272141 Crawford Dec 2005 A1
20060094626 Horton May 2006 A1
20070093618 Cheng et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070282070 Adams et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080038241 Schasfoort et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080108745 Russell et al. May 2008 A1
20080119381 Wang et al. May 2008 A1
20080145906 Boucher et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080293117 Wang et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080319193 Grauert et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090023859 Sakanoue et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090045056 Berberich et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090104086 Zax et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090238811 McDaniel et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090274846 Wada et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090325843 Man et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100210745 McDaniel et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100236582 Heintz et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100248334 McDaniel Sep 2010 A1
20100269731 Tofte Jespersen et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100279376 Wang et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100305014 Miralles et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110076738 Wang et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110195035 Vondruska et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110240064 Wales et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110250626 Williams et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110311482 Wang et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110312057 Buthe et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120097194 McDaniel et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120114961 Lee et al. May 2012 A1
20120136119 Davis et al. May 2012 A1
20120208923 Jia et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120238005 Wieland et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120276617 Jia et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130065291 Jia et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130137159 Buthe et al. May 2013 A1
20140083324 Wales et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140141490 Wang et al. May 2014 A1
20140193888 Souter et al. Jul 2014 A1
20150175982 Buthe et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150191607 McDaniel Jul 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (62)
Number Date Country
2003304222 Jan 2005 AU
2004257205 Jan 2005 AU
2010201732 May 2010 AU
2538124 Dec 2004 CA
616033 Sep 1994 EP
0670380 Sep 1995 EP
609691 May 1998 EP
0896056 Feb 1999 EP
1161502 Dec 2004 EP
1551927 Jul 2005 EP
1609826 Dec 2005 EP
1644452 Apr 2006 EP
1660596 May 2006 EP
001661955 May 2006 EP
2746378 Jun 2014 EP
2832145 May 2003 FR
1518746 Jul 1978 GB
2410249 Jul 2005 GB
2430436 Mar 2007 GB
167413 Dec 2010 IL
174122 Sep 2011 IL
173658 Apr 2012 IL
208769 Apr 2012 IL
214668 Jan 2013 IL
214669 Jan 2013 IL
214670 Jan 2013 IL
214671 Jan 2013 IL
214672 Jan 2013 IL
218129 Sep 2013 IL
86377999 Apr 1988 JP
S63171678 Jul 1988 JP
S63202677 Aug 1988 JP
H01-285188 Nov 1989 JP
H0268117 Mar 1990 JP
H02-227471 Sep 1990 JP
H6-240297 Aug 1994 JP
H8-126489 May 1996 JP
09-038183 Feb 1997 JP
9-059470 Mar 1997 JP
2002526430 Aug 2002 JP
2002-537470 Nov 2002 JP
2002332739 Nov 2002 JP
2004506089 Feb 2004 JP
2009-511072 Mar 2009 JP
2010-510380 Apr 2010 JP
6096748 Mar 2017 JP
6192022 Sep 2017 JP
8906278 Jul 1989 WO
9516029 Jun 1995 WO
9721804 Jun 1997 WO
WO-9957157 Nov 1999 WO
0050521 Aug 2000 WO
200107484 Feb 2001 WO
0153010 Jul 2001 WO
0216521 Feb 2002 WO
2005026269 Mar 2005 WO
2005103372 Nov 2005 WO
2007017701 Feb 2007 WO
2008000646 Jan 2008 WO
2008063902 May 2008 WO
2009155115 Dec 2009 WO
2012110563 Aug 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (145)
Entry
Minier,et al. Covalent Immobilization of Lysozyme on Stainless Steel Interface Spectroscopic Characterization and Measurement of Enzymatic Activity Langmuir 2005, 21, 5957-5965 (Year: 2005).
Pdf attached of website http://jenalib.leibniz-fli.de/ImgLibDoc/ftir/IMAGE_FTIR.html#:˜:text=Amide%20vibrations,-The%20peptide%20group&text=Amide%20I%20and%20amide%20II,related%20to%20the%20backbone%20conformation. (Year: 2022).
DFT-Calculated IR Spectrum Amide I, II, and III Band Contributions of N-Methylacetamide Fine Components Yan Ji,et al. ACS Omega May 2020 (15), 8572-8578 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b04421. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7178369/pdf/ao9b04421.pdf (Year: 2020).
Diane K. Williiams et al., “Analysis of Latent Fingerprint Deposits by Infrared Microspectroscopy”, Applied Spectroscopy, vol. 58, No. 3, (2004) pp. 313-316.
E. Roland Menzel, Fingerprint Detection with Lasers, Chapter 7 “Photoluminescence-Based Physical Treatments” Marcel Dekker, Inc. (1999) pp. 155-178.
Edward Bartick et al., “Spectrochemical Analysis and Hyperspectral Imaging of Latent Fingerprints”, 16th Meeting of the International Association of Forensic Sciences, (2002) pp. 61-64.
Enzyme Nomenclature 1984, “Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry on the Nomenclature and Classification of Enzyme-Catalysed Reactions”, Academic Press, New York (1984) pp. 270-279.
G L Thomas and T E Reynoldson, “Some observations on fingerprint deposits”, 1975 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. vol. 8 (1975) pp. 724-729.
Gary Mong et al., “The Chemistry of Latent Prints from Children and Adults”, The Chesapeake Examiner, Fall 1999, vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 4-6.
Geraldine F. Drevon et al.; High-Activity Enzyme-Polyurethane Coatings; (2002) Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 70, No. 7, Inc. pp. 785-794.
J. David Rozzell, “Immobilized Aminotransferases for Amino Acid Production”, Methods in Enzymology, vol. 136, (1987) pp. 479-497.
Keiji G. Asano et al., “Chemical Composition of Fingerprints for Gender Determination”, J Forensic Sci, Jul. 2002, vol. 47, No. 4.
Kimone M. Antoine, “Chemical Differences are Observed in Children's Versus Adults' Latent Fingerprints as a Function of Time”, J Forensic Sci, Mar. 2010, vol. 55, No. 2.
Kostadin Bobev, “Fingerprints and Factors Affecting Their Condition”, J. Forensic Ident. 176/45 (2) 1995, pp. 176-183.
Mansfeld et al. Biotechnol. Bioengineer. (2007) 97: 672-679 (Year: 2007).
McDaniel, C.S. et al., “Biocatalytic paints and coatings,” ACS Symposium Series (2009), 1002 (Smart Coatings II), pp. 239-249.
Methods in Biotechnology, vol. 17, Microbial Enzymes and Biotransformations, Humana Press, Inc., Totowa, NJ, (2005), Scott J. Novick and J. David Rozzell, “Immobilization of Enzymes by Covalent Attachment”.
Mujumder et al. Int. J. Pharma Bio Sci. (2012) 3(1):610-627 (Year: 2012).
Novick, S. et al.; Protein-containing hydrophobic coatings and films, Biomaterials, 23: 441-448, 2002.
Ramotowski, R.S., in Advances in Fingerprint Technology, Chapter 3, Henry C Lee and R.E. Gaensslen, eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, (2001) pp. 63-104.
Reactive Surfaces v. Toyota Motor Corporation, Case IPR2016-01462, Paper No. 51 (PTAB, Jan. 12, 2018).
Reactive Surfaces v. Toyota Motor Corporation, Case IPR2016-01914, Paper No. 64 (PTAB, Mar. 1, 2018).
Reactive Surfaces v. Toyota Motor Corporation, Case IPR2017-00572, Paper No. 42 (PTAB, Feb. 5, 2018).
Robert D. Olsen, Sr., “Chemical Dating Techniques for Latent Fingerprints: A Preliminary Report”, Identification News, (Feb. 1987) pp. 10-12.
Robert D. Olsen, Sr., “Scott's Fingerprint Mechanics” Chapter III, “Latent Fingerprints and Crime Scene Procedures”, (1978) pp. 109-158.
Robert S. Ramotowski, Advances in Fingerprint Technology (2nd ed.), Chapter 3, “Composition of Latent Print Residue”, In H.C. Lee and R.E. Gaensslen (Eds), Boca Raton: CRC Press, (2001) pp. 63-104.
Roberts, “Chemistry for peptide and protein PEGylation”, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 54, 2002, p. 459-476.
S.M. Bleay et al., “Fingerprint Source Book: manual of development techniques”, London: Home Office—Centre for Applied Sciences and Technology. Chapter 2: Finger mark examination techniques within scope of ISO 17025, pp. 3-38 (2013) URL: http://www.gov.uk/government/publications/fingerprint-source-book.
Science News Staff, “Fleeting Fingerprints May Yield Powerful New Tools”, Apr. 15, 1997.
Sookkheo et al., Protein Expression and Purification (2000) 20: 142-151.
T. Kent (Ed.), Manual of Fingerprint Development Techniques—A Guide to the Selection and Use of Processes for the Development of Latent Fingerprints, 2nd Ed 1998 (Revised Jan. 2001), Sandridge: Home Office Police Scientific Develpment Branch, Chapter 1 “Latent Fingerprints”, Sections 1.1, 1.2, 2.6 and “Visual Examination”.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/643,666, filed Dec. 21, 2009.
United States Department of Justice—Federal Bureau of Investigation, “The Science of Fingerprints—Classification and Uses”, (Rev. 12-84), Chapter XIII “Latent Impressions” pp. 170-174 (1985).
Young Duk Kim et al., “Siloxane-Based Biocatalytic Films and Paints for Use as Reactive Coatings”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 72, No. 4, Feb. 20, 2001, pp. 475-482.
Mansfeld, “The Stability of Engineered Thermostable Neutral Proteases from Bacillus Stearothermophilus in Organic Solvents and Detergents”, Biotechnol. Bioeng. (2007) 97 (4): 672-679.
Bernfield, P. and Wan, J., “Antigens and Enzymes Made Insoluble by Entrapping Them into Lattices of Synthetic Polymers”, Science 142 (3593), pp. 678-679 (1963).
Pollak et al., “Enzyme Immobilization by Condensation Copolymerization into Cross-Linked Polyacrylamide Gels”, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, pp. 6324-6336.
Fukui et al., “Application of Photo-Crosslinkable Resin to Immobilization of an Enzyme”, FEBS Letters, Jul. 1976, pp. 179-182, vol. 66, No. 2.
Fukui et al., “[20] Entrapment of Biocatalysts with Photo-Cross-Linkable Resin Prepolymers and Urethane Resin Prepolymers”, Methods in Enzymology, vol. 135, 1987, pp. 230-252.
K. Yokozeki et al., “Application of Immobilized Lipase to Regio-Specific Interesterification of Triglyceride in Organic Solvent”, European J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (1982) 14:1-5.
Fusee, Murray C., “[42] Industrial Production of L-Aspartic Acid Using Polyurethane-Immobilized Cells Containing Aspartase”, Methods in Enzymology, vol. 136, 1987, pp. 463-471.
G.J. Calton et al., “[45] Phenylalanine Production via Polyazetidine-Immobilized Escherichia coli: Optimization of Cell Loading” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 136, 1987, pp. 497-502.
Takagi, Toshio, “Confirmation of Molecular Weight of Aspergillus oryzae a-Amylase Using the Low Angle Laser Light Scattering Technique in Combination with High Pressure Silica Gel Chromatography”, J. Biochem. vol. 89, No. 2, (1981), pp. 363-368.
E.A. Stein et al., “Alpha-Amylases as Calcium-Metalloenzymes. I. Preparation of Calcium-free Apoamylases by Chelation and Electrodialysis”, Biochemistry, vol. 3, No. 1, Jan. 1964, pp. 56-61.
G. Muralikrishna et al., “Cereal a-amylases—an overview”, Carbohydrate Polymers 60 (2005) pp. 163-173.
C.P. Poole, Jr. et al., “Introduction to Nanotechnology”, John Wiley & Sons, 2003, Hoboken, NJ, Table 12.1 on p. 315.
L.R. Murphy et al., “Research Paper Protein hydraftion and unfolding”, Folding & Design vol. 3, No. 2, 1998, pp. 105-118.
K. Won et al., “Effects of Water and Silica Gel on Enzyme Agglomeration in Organic Solvents”, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2001, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 150-155.
R. Balasubramanian et al., “Extraction and Dispersion of Large Gold Nanoparticles in Nonpolar Solvents”, J. Dispersion Science and Technology, vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 485-489 (2001).
M.S. Kunz et al., “Colloidal Gold Dispersions in Polymeric Matrices”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 156, pp. 240-249 (1993).
A. Gole et al., “Pepsin-Gold Colloid Conjugates: Preparation, Characterization, and Enzymatic Activity”, Langmuir 2001, 17, pp. 1674-1679.
A. Gole et al., “Studies on the formation of bioconjugates of Engoglucanase with colloidal gold”, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 25 (2002) pp. 129-138.
Product Sheet by Novozymes A/S for Termamyl 120L, Type L pp. 1:4-4:4 (2002).
Johanna Mansfeld et al.; Site-specific and random immobilization of thermolysin-like proteases reflected in the thermal inactivation kinetics; Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. (2000); pp. 189-195.
Minoru Kumakura et al.; 201. Interaction of Enzyme with Polymer Matrix in Immobilized Enzymes; Helvetica Chimica Acta; vol. 66; Fasc. 7; (1983); pp. 2044-2048.
Jaroslava Turková; Immobilization of Enzymes on Hydroxyalkyl Methacrylate Gels; Immobilization Techniques; Methods in Enzymology; (1976); 344: pp. 66-83.
Masahiro Takagi et al.; Nucleotide Sequence and Promoter Region for the Neutral Protease Gene from Bacillus stearothermophilus; Journal of Bacteriology, Sep. 1985, pp. 824-831.
Kuniyo Inouye et al.; Engineering, expression, purification, and production of recombinant thermolysin; Biotechnology Annual Review; vol. 13; ISSN 1387-2656; pp. 43-64 (2007).
Drevon, G. et al.; High-Activity Enzyme-Polyurethane Coatings, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 79(7): 785-794, Sep. 30, 2002.
Mansfeld, et al.: The Stability of Engineered Thermostable Neutral Proteases from Bacillus Stearothermophilus in Organic Solvents and Detergents, Biotechnol. Bioeng. (2007) 97 (4): 672-679.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,347, filed Nov. 29, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/097,128, filed Dec. 4, 2013.
Drevon, Géraldine F., “Enzyme Immobilization into Polymers and Coatings”, University of Pittsburgh School of Engineering Dissertation, Nov. 2002.
Lt Col C. Carl Bostek, “Effective methods of in-line intravenous fluid warming at low to moderate infusion rates” Journal of the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists, vol. 60, No. 6, Dec. 1992.
McDaniel, Steve et al., “Functional Additives: A Platform for Revitalizing the Paint and Coatings Industry”, coatingsworld.com, Feb. 2010.
McDaniel, Steve, “Formulating with Bioengineered Additives: Enhancing the Performance and Functionality of Paints and Coatings”, coatingsworld.com, Mar. 2010.
McDaniel, Steve, “Bioengineered Additives A Pipeline of Value Delivering Unique Functionality to Your Coating”, Coatings World, vol. 15, No. 5, coatingsworld.com, May 2010.
Ciba Tinuvin 328 Light Stabiliser, Ciba Specialty Chemicals Inc., Coating Effects Segment, Edition: Dec. 9, 1997 Basle.
Ciba Tinuvin 1130, Ciba Specialty Chemicals Inc., Coating Effects Segment, Edition: Dec. 15, 1997 Basle.
“Printing & Packaging Industrial Coatings Technical Data Sheet Tinuvin 400” BASF The Chemical Company, Dec. 2010 Rev 1.
R. Lambourne and T.A. Strivens (Editors), “Paint and surface coatings—Theorgy and practice” second edition, “5.18 Ultraviolet absorbers”, 1999, pp. 195-196, William Andrew Publishing.
Dieter Stoye and Werner Freitag (Editors) “Paints, Coatings and Solvents”, Second, Completely Revised Edition, “5. Paint Additives”, 1998, p. 170, Wiley VCH.
Johan Bieleman (Editor), “Additives for Coatings”, “8,2,3 Properties of Light Stabilizers”, 2000, pp. 279-280, Wiley VCH.
H. Domininghaus, “Plastics for Engineers: Materials, Properties, Applications”, 1993, p. 612, Carl Hanser.
Ruby Ynalvez et al., “Mini-review: toxicity of mercury as a consequence of enzyme alternation”, Biometals (2016) 29: 781-788.
Manuela F. Frasco et al., “Mechanisms of cholinesterase inhibition by inorganic mercury”, FEBS Journal 274 (2007) 1849-1861.
S. Gourinath et al. “Mercury induced modifications in the stereochemistry of the active site through Cys-73 in a serine protease—Crystal structure of the complex of a partially modified proteinase K with mercury at 1.8 Å resolution”, Indian Journal of Biochemistry & Biophysics, vol. 38, Oct. 2001, pp. 298-302.
Annamaria Guagliardi et al., “Stability and activity of a thermostable malic enzyme in denaturants and water-miscible organic solvents” Eur. J. Biochem. 183, 25-30 (1989).
H.N. Fernley and P.G. Walker, “Studies on Alkaline Phosphatase: Inhibition by Phosphate Derivatives and the Substrate Specificity” Biochem. J. (1967) 104, 1011-1018.
Defoamer Technologies Agitanò, Münzing, PCA Apr. 2012.
Jose L. Muñoz-Muñoz et al., “Phenolic substrates and suicide inactivation of tyrosinase: kinetics and mechanism”, Biochem. J. (2008) 416, 431-440.
Travis J. O'Brien et al., Effects of hexavalent chromium on the survival and cell cycle distribution of DNA repair-deficient S. cerevisiae, DNA Repair 1 (2002) 617-627, Elsevier.
Joan L. Huber et al., “Inactiviation of Highly Activated Spinach Leaf Sucrose-Phosphate Synthase by Dephosphorylation”, Plant Physiol. (1991) 95, 291-297.
J.M. Widholm et al., “Inhibition of Cultured Cell Growth by Tungstate and Molybdate”, Plant Cell Reports (1983) 2: 15-18, Springer-Verlag.
K.J. Lewis, J.H. Aklian, A. Sharaby, J.D. Zook, “Quantitative methods of predicting relative effectiveness of corrosion inhibitive coatings”, Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, (1996) vol. 68 Issue: 3, pp. 12-22.
K.D. Ralston et al., “Electrochemical Evaluation of Constituent Intermetallics in Aluminum Alloy 2024-T3 Exposed to Aqueous Vanadate Inhibitors”, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 156 (4) C135-C146 (2009).
David B. Volkin, Henryk Mach and C. Russell Middaugh, “Review: Degradative Covalent Reactions Important to Protein Stability”, Molecular Biotechnology 105, vol. 8, pp. 105-121 (1995).
“Emulsion Stability and Testing”, Technical Brief 2011 vol. 2, Particle Sciences, Inc.
Solvent Miscibility Table / Solvent Polarity Chart (2013).
Muxin Liu, Michael A. Brook, Paul M. Zelisko and Amro N. Ragheb, “Chapter 11. Preparation and Applications of Silicone Emulsions Using Biopolymers”, Colloidal Biomolecules, Biomaterials, and Biomedical Applications (2003).
Roman Pichot, “Stability and Characterisation of Emulsions in the presence of Colloidal Particles and Surfactants” A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Nov. 2010.
Wang, P. et al, Enzyme Stabilization by Covalent Binding in Nanoporous Sol-Gel Glass for Nonaqueous Biocatalysis; Biotech. Bioeng. 2001, 74(3):249-255.
Kim Y. et al, Siloxane-based biocatalytic films and paints for use as reactive coatings, Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2001, 72(4), 475-482.
“Enzyme Nomenclature—Recommendations (1978) of the Nomenclature Committee of the international Union of Biochemistry”, Academic Press, New York, (1979) pp. 234-239.
A. Dorinson et al, “Refractive Indices and Densities of Normal Saturated Fatty Acids in the Liquid State”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1942, 64(12), pp. 2739-2741.
Anil K. Jain et al., “Integrating Faces, Fingerprints, and Soft Biometric Traits for User Recognition”, Proceedings of Biometric Authentication Workshop, LNCS 3087, pp. 259-269,Prague, May 2004.
Arthur and Elizabeth Rose, “The Condensed Chemical Dictionary (7th Ed.)”, New York: Reinhold Publishing Co., pp. 80, 104, 222-223, 545, 556, 644-645, 691, 704, 716, 887, 891 (1961).
B. Drozdowski et al.,. “Isopropyl Alcohol Extraction of Oil and Lipids in the Production of Fish Protein Concentrate from Herring”, Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, (Jul. 1969) vol. 46, pp. 371-376.
B. Scruton et al, “The deposition of fingerprint films” 1975 J. Phys. D: Appl PHys. 8 pp. 714-723.
B.M. Craig, “Refractive Indices of Some Saturated and Monoethenoid Fatty Acids and Methyl Esters”, Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 1953, 31(5): pp. 499-504, https://doi.org/10.1139/v53-068.
David Rozzell and Fritz Wager (Eds), Biocatalytic Production of Amino Acids & Derivatives, Chapter 13 “Immobilized Enzymes: Techniques & Applications”, Hanser Publishers (1992), pp. 306-319.
Deliang He et al., a-Amylase immobilized on bulk acoustic-wave sensor by UV-curing coating, Biochemical Engineering Journal 6 (2000) 7-11.
G.W. Xing et al., “Influence of reaction conditions on syntheses of sweetener precursors catalyzed by thermolysin in tert-amyl alcohol”, J. Peptide Res. vol. 52, Issue 4, pp. 300-304 (Date: 1998).
A. Koohestanian et al., “The Separation Method for Removing of Colloidal Particles from Raw Water”, American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 4 (2): pp. 266-273 (2008).
W. Stöber et al., “Controlled Growth of Monodisperse Silica Spheres in the micron Size Range”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 26, pp. 62-69 (1968).
M. Melchiors et al., “Recent developments in aqueous two-component polyurethane (2K-PUR) coatings”, Progress in Organic Coatings 40 (2000), pp. 99-109, p. 100, first complete paragraph.
N.F. Almeida et al., “Immobilization of Glucose Oxidase in Thin Polypyrrole Films: Influence of Polymerization Conditions and Film Thickness on the Activity and Stability of the Immobilized Enzyme”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 42, pp. 1037-1045 (1993).
Green, Philip, “Fineness of Grind”, European Coatings Journal, (2003), Issue 10, p. 53.
Third-Party Submission Under 37 CFR 1.290 dated Aug. 13, 2018 filed in U.S. Appl. No. 15/790,846, filed Oct. 23, 2017.
Third-Party Submission Under 37 CFR 1.290 dated Jul. 25, 2018 filed in U.S. Appl. No. 15/810,700, filed Nov. 13, 2017.
Third-Party Submission Under 37 CFR 1.290 dated Jul. 25, 2018 filed in U.S. Appl. No. 15/810,713, filed Nov. 13, 2017.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 14, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/166,376.
Office Action Response filed Apr. 14, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/166,376.
Final Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/166,376.
Notice of Appeal and Pre-Brief Conference Request filed on Jun. 26, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/166,376.
Pre-Brief Appeal Conference Decision dated Jul. 21, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/166,376.
Notice of Allowance and Notice of Allowability dated Jul. 24, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/166,376.
Reactive Surfaces v. Toyota Motor Corporation, Case IPR2018-01194 filed Jun. 4, 2018, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,193,873 B2 with Declaration and Resume of Dr. David Rozzell, Ph.D.
“Enzyme Nomenclature—Recommendations (1978) of the Nomenclature Committee of the international Union of Biochemistry”, Academic Press, New York, (1979) pp. 274-277.
Reactive Surfaces v. Toyota Motor Corporation, Case IPR2017-00572, Paper No. 42 (PTAB, Feb. 5, 2017).
Office Action Response filed Apr. 27, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/097,128.
Amendment and RCE Response filed Aug. 26, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/097,128.
Rebuttal document produced during oral deposition of Douglas Lamb, Ph.D.; May 10, 2017.
OMG Borchers GmbH; “Low molecular weight methyl polysiloxane for improved leveling and anti-float properties in solvent based coatings systems. 100% active”; Jul. 1, 2014.
OMG Borchers GmbH; “Low molecular weight methyl polysiloxane for improved leveling and anti-float properties in solvent based coatings systems. 100% active ingredient”; Aug. 28, 2009.
Reply Declaration of Eric Ray; Nov. 6, 2017.
Reactive Surfaces v. Toyota Motor Corporation, Case IPR2019-00867, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,428,740 B2, PTAB (Mar. 21, 2019).
Michelle V. Buchanan et al., “Chemical Characteristics of Fingerprints from Adults and Children,” in Forencsic Evidence Analysis & Crime Scene Investigation, 2941 Proc. SPIE 89 (Feb. 5, 1997).
G.M. Mong et al. “Advanced Fingerprint Analysis Project Fingerprint Constituents,” Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Laboratory (1999).
The American Heritage STEDMAN'S Medical Dictionary, Second Edition, (Copyright 2007 and 2004, Houghton Mifflin), pp. 463-464, 884.
K. Hans Brockerhoff et al., “Lipolytic Enzymes”, Academic Press, Inc., New York, New York, 1974, pp. 1-2, 4 and 8.
Shigeru Yamanaka et al., “[37] Regiospecific Interesterification of Triglyceride with Celite-Adsorbed Lipase,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 136, pp. 405-411 (1987).
Kiyotaka Oyama et al., “[46] Production of Aspartame by Immobilized Thermoase”, Methods in Enzymology vol. 136, pp. 503-516 (1987).
Bo Chen et al., “Candida antarctica Lipase B Chemically Immobilized on Epoxy-Activated Micro- and Nanobeads: Catalysts for Polyester Synthesis”, Biomacromolecules (published Jan. 16, 2008), vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 463-471.
K. Bagi et al., “Immobilization and characterization of porcine pancreas lipase”, Eyzyme and Microbial Technology vol. 20, pp. 531-535 (1997).
Recorded Assignment Documentation for U.S. Appl. No. 14/643,445, filed Mar. 10, 2015 (Exhibit 1003 from IPR2019-00867).
Declaration of Dr. David Rozzell, Ph.D. (Exhibit 1009 from IPR2019-00867)—May 14, 2018.
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2015 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/643,445, filed Mar. 10, 2015.
Office Action Response filed Dec. 29, 2015 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/643,445, filed Mar. 10, 2015.
Notice of Allowance and Notice of Allowability dated Apr. 28, 2016 from U.S. Appl. No. 14/643,445, filed Mar. 10, 2015.
As-filed U.S. Appl. No. 12/820,063, filed Jun. 21, 2010.
Deposition Transcript of Dr. Jonathan S. Dordick from IPR2016-01914 (Exhibit 1015 from IPR2019-00867)—Oct. 18, 2017.
Yang et al. Biotechnol Lett. Jul. 2010: 32(7): 951-6. Epub Mar. 8, 2010 (Year: 2010).
Chen et al. Biomacromolecules. Feb. 2008: 9(2): 463-71. Epub (Year: Jan. 16, 2008).
Yu et al. Biotechnol Lett. Apr. 2004; 26(8): 629-33 (Year: 2004).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190153422 A1 May 2019 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 15790846 Oct 2017 US
Child 16255416 US
Parent 11562503 Nov 2006 US
Child 15790846 US