This invention relates to masks which protect against biological hazards.
Terrorists are thought capable of launching a major biological attack on civilian populations. They might use localized biohazardous material, such as weaponized anthrax, or they might use deadly infectious agents, such as smallpox. Numerous such materials and agents exist, each with its own transmission efficiency, survivability in the atmosphere, portability, resulting symptoms, resulting morbidity and resulting mortality.
Man-made threats are not the only ones seemingly on the rise. The prospect of a pandemic from the spread of natural infectious agents also seems to be increasing. The 2003 SARS outbreak is a recent example. Putting such natural events into perspective, the 1918 influenza pandemic is widely thought to have killed more soldiers during WWI than did combat.
The inventors know of no prior biohazard protective gear designed particularly with the needs of civilians in mind. During an outbreak, public health will require widespread use of the most effective biohazard protection gear available. This entails equipment that maximizes comfort and wearability, yet minimizes the receipt and re-transmission of deadly or dangerous infectious agents. Comfort and wearability are especially important, given that users will need to wear the gear for long periods of time yet will lack the discipline which comes from military training.
Biohazard protective gear is most commonly designed for military applications. U.S. Pat. No. 6,158,429, assigned to the United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army, is exemplary of this art. It discloses a hood respirator for protection against biological hazards. The device disclosed therein is a complete hooded respirator assembly form fitting to the head and neck of the user. There are two HEPA filters for intake, one adjacent each cheek, as well as an exhalate “breathe-through airflow assembly.” The hooded respirator also contains a clear eye lens. The '429 patent recognizes that protection against biological agents requires only HEPA filtering, whereas protection against chemical agents, too, would require the addition of activated carbon filtering. While the '429 patent discloses filtering inhalate, it does not disclose filtration of outgoing exhalate. The device disclosed therein would therefore be of limited use during a pandemic, or in the presence of any number of infectious biological warfare agents on the battlefield or during a terrorist attack, since an infected wearer of the assembly might still be a disease vector. The '429 patent's hooded respirator also comprises a single volume enclosing the eyes, nose and mouth. This poses a fogging problem, requiring a “solution” of re-directing inhaled air across the interior of the lens. Under high humidity conditions, this anti-fogging measure might not work. Since this single volume must enclose the eyes as well as the nose and mouth, it also acts as a reservoir for CO2, reducing comfort and wearability. The hood can be hot for the wearer, too.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,957,131, also assigned to the United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army, discloses a biological warfare mask. The mask shown therein does not include eye protection. Instead, it shows two tubes to fit inside the nostrils, and a mouthpiece to fit inside the mouth. Thus this mask cannot protect against the many infectious agents which enter through the eyes. Nor is there filtering of exhalate.
Exemplary military gas masks, or combined chemical-biological masks, are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,181,506 and 6,176,239, respectively, both assigned to the United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army. These masks require carbon filtering. These masks were apparently not designed with long-term civilian use in mind. They lack any disclosure of exhalate filtering, and the '239 patent in fact attributes specific disadvantages to filtering of exhalate. And like the device of the '429 patent, the devices disclosed therein permit lens fogging through exhalate moisture build-up, which then must be abated with the “solution” of passing inhalate across the lens interior.
It is thus an object of the invention to provide a biohazard mask designed with the needs of civilian populations (adults and children) in mind.
The present invention accommodates the goals of a civilian biohazard mask through a number of design features, appearing as recited in various instances and combinations in the appended claims. For maximum effectiveness against disease re-transmission (particularly useful during household quarantines or at healthcare facilities), the invention provides HEPA filtering for both inhalate and exhalate. For maximum protection against lens fogging, the eye volume is separate from the mouth and nose volume. The eye volume further includes water vapor-permeable, agent-impermeable, membranes to allow release of built-up water vapor, augmented with a passive air-circulation system. For maximum breathing comfort, the mouth-nose volume is minimized, and measures are taken to maximize moisture discharge. For maximum wearability and comfort, the mask is sealed to the face using a combination memory seal/gel seal, and is suspended from the head using netting.
Bidirectional filtering is of particular significance during a pandemic or localized epidemic. When a highly transmissible and particularly deadly infectious agent pervades the environment, civil authorities will likely impose quarantines. Thus there will be an increased likelihood of infected people living in close quarters with otherwise uninfected people. Moreover, health care facilities will likely receive many infected people for care, creating another highly concentrated population of infected people in close quarters with otherwise uninfected people. Since in many cases a person may re-transmit a disease long before the onset of symptoms, there is a heightened need to provide a biohazard mask that minimizes re-transmission.
Other inventive aspects of the contributions herein will be apparent from the detailed description as augmented by the drawings.
Identical reference numerals are intended to reflect identical parts and features in each of the figures.
Directing attention to
The lens portion 100 may be made of any clear lens material, preferably polycarbonate, and most preferably polycarbonate that may flex during ordinary movement of the wearer. Lens portion 100 also preferably includes two further structures (not shown) that function to remove moisture from the eye area. One is a water vapor-permeable, biological agent-impermeable membrane, preferably TYVEK, and most preferably TYVEK of over one square inch surface area on each side of the lens portion. The other is a one way air release valve in communication with the air in the eye volume that acts at a pressure resistance lower than the membrane for gradually releasing moist eye-volume air into the ambient environment upon ordinary flexion of the lens material or ordinary movement of the face against the seal. That is, ordinary face and body movements of the wearer are sufficient to “squeeze” moist air out of the valve on a regular basis, which will then be replaced by continual entry of sanitary, dry ambient air passing inwardly through the permeable membrane. The membrane and release valve act to abate moisture buildup in the eye area, and thus minimize fogging. Another feature of the mask that contributes to moisture abatement and anti-fogging is that the eye volume is sealed separately from the mouth-nose volume, to be discussed below.
In an alternative embodiment, lens portion 100 may suitably accommodate prescription lenses, either by permitting a large enough interior volume to fit conventional glasses or pince-nez, or alternatively by permitting snap-fit engagement of prescription lenses in the manner described in column 5 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,181,506, or equivalent means.
The mouth-nose portion 200 of the mask of the embodiment of
The suspension portion 300 of the mask of the embodiment of
Directing attention to
Directing attention to
Directing attention to
Turning again to filter characteristics, the inhalation HEPA filter should preferably be selected to provide up to 1 square foot of total filtration surface. The exhalation HEPA filter has different design criterial from the inhalation HEPA filter because of the moisture content of exhaled breath. Thus, it can be preferably of somewhat less total filtration surface, and should have a more open weave. In addition, to maximize water vapor dispersion, some portion of the filter fibers can be of the hollow variety to augment wicking. In addition, the filter medium may be electrically charged, which further helps abate moisture during exhalation.
Directing attention to
Directing attention to
Other features of the mask of the present embodiment which are not shown include a KAPTON vocal membrane to facilitate speech. If it is desired, electronic communications may also be accommodated. Thus, a microphone might be placed inside the mouth-nose volume, connected to a microphone jack somewhere on the surface of the mask. In addition, in masks designed to cover the ears, ear speakers may also be included, and similarly jacked in. Thus, in an alternate embodiment, a wearer can interface with a telephone, or with audio entertainment, without removing the mask and compromising personal or public health during an outbreak. Inclusion of telephone or entertainment capabilities also maximizes user comfort and wearability. Also not shown, a drinking straw may be suitably inserted through the mask in an appropriate place to permit ingestion of liquids without removing the mask. It will also be appreciated that the mask of the present embodiment may be ornamented with designs or fashion elements to encourage continued use throughout an outbreak. In this light, the durable material that makes up the mask may be formed from translucent or transparent polymer material, and such material may in turn be infused with various light pastel colors or designs. A substantially clear or translucent mask enhances wearer recognizability, and would also make for an attractive, sleek design that encourages continued use throughout an outbreak. (Of course, the filters are opaque.).
It will be appreciated that those skilled in the art may now make many uses and modifications of the specific embodiments described without departing from the inventive concepts. For example, while the embodiments show a mask, those of skill in the art may readily apply the inventive concepts herein to equivalent gear interchangeable with a mask in light of the teachings herein, e.g., a suit, a hood, or any other gear designed for protection of health. The recitation of the features and characteristics of the embodiments shown above is not meant to be limiting, but rather exemplary, with the appended claims and their equivalents defining the patentee's property rights hereunder.
This application claims priority to provisional application No. 60/441,802, filed Jan. 22, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
476486 | Pozdena | Jun 1892 | A |
3633575 | Brumfield | Jan 1972 | A |
4454881 | Huber et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4595003 | Shoemaker et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4771771 | Walther | Sep 1988 | A |
5069205 | Urso | Dec 1991 | A |
5131387 | French et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5357947 | Alder | Oct 1994 | A |
5431156 | Sundstrom | Jul 1995 | A |
5517986 | Starr et al. | May 1996 | A |
5595173 | Dodd, Jr. | Jan 1997 | A |
5669375 | Dahrendorf et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5884624 | Barnett et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6062220 | Whitaker et al. | May 2000 | A |
6062222 | Lewis et al. | May 2000 | A |
6082360 | Rudolph et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6216693 | Rekow et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224655 | Messier | May 2001 | B1 |
6345620 | Salapow et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6375854 | Beplate | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6397847 | Scarberry et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6401716 | Sword et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6460539 | Japuntich et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6543450 | Flynn | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6584976 | Japuntich et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6588424 | Bardel | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6631718 | Lovell | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6659102 | Sico | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6681765 | Wen | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6689278 | Beplate | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701925 | Resnick | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6736137 | Resnick et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
20020023651 | Japuntich et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020129818 | Morgan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030005934 | Japuntich et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030047183 | Kiefer et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030111074 | Alon et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040003810 | Templeton | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040011363 | Wiener et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2228420 | Aug 1990 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060201511 A1 | Sep 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60441802 | Jan 2003 | US |