Patent Application
20070264534
The following description provides a detailed discussion of certain embodiments and features of the systems, processes, compositions, and kits of the invention. It is not meant to be exhaustive of all such embodiments and features, but rather is presented to give the reader a better understanding of selected exemplary embodiments and features.
To give the reader a better understanding of the invention, certain terms are now defined and/or discussed. Terms not discussed or defined herein are to be understood as being used in their normal and customary way in the art.
By “polysaccharide” it is meant any oligomer or polymer of glucan units larger than monomers. Polysaccharide will thus be used interchangeably with “oligosaccharide”, “glucan”, “sugar oligomer”, and “sugar polymer”. Polysaccharides can include (but are not limited to) starch, cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, maltose, isomaltose, cellobiose, β-1,4-glucan, β-1,3-glucan, β-1,6-glucan, α-1,4-glucan, α-1,6-glucan, or any other oligomers of monomeric sugar units linked by glycosidic bonds. Mixtures of any number of polysaccharides can also be used, and such mixtures are included in the term “polysaccharides”.
As used herein, “enzymes” are protein catalysts that catalyze (i.e., accelerate) chemical and biochemical reactions. As used herein, “enzyme” is meant to encompass a single enzyme, mixtures comprising one or more enzymes, or enzyme complexes. As used herein, “enzyme unit” (or “unit”) is defined as an amount of an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of 1 micromole (um) of substrate per minute. The conditions for the purposes of the definition of enzyme unit are a temperature of 30° C. and the pH value and substrate concentration that yield the maximum substrate conversion rate.
The Enzyme Commission number (EC number) is a numerical classification scheme for enzymes, based on the chemical reactions they catalyze. For the purposes of the present invention, an EC number will also be used to specify enzymes. When an enzyme is characterized by an EC number herein, it is understood that there can be multiple enzymes from different sources or organisms that all catalyze the same reaction. The invention is not limited to any particular enzyme or source of enzymes, but rather to certain enzyme-catalyzed reactions in a pathway, as will be described below. The language “an enzyme that is characterized by EC 2.4.1.11”, for example, means any amino acid sequence that has the EC number 2.4.1.1 according to at least one art-recognized enzyme information system (such as BRENDA or KEGG) as of the filing date of this application.
As is known in the art, “identity” between two enzymes is determined by comparing the amino acid sequence of one enzyme to the sequence of a second enzyme. Identity may be determined by procedures which are well-known in the art, for example, by utilizing BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool at the National Center for Biological Information). When enzyme identity is recited in conjunction with an enzyme EC number, according to the present description it is to be understood that there can be many different amino acid sequences that all have the same EC number. Thus, for example, the language “an enzyme that is at least 90% identical to EC 2.4.11” means an amino acid sequence that is computed to have 90% or better sequence identity to at least one amino acid sequence that has the EC number 2.4.1.1 according to at least one art-recognized enzyme information system (such as BRENDA or KEGG) as of the filing date of the present application.
Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing concentrations of components, reaction conditions, stoichiometries, and so forth used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about”, which indicates that the stated value encompasses all values above or below it by 5% of the value and/or within the level of error intrinsic to the method of obtaining the value. Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the following specification and attached claims are approximations that may vary depending at least upon the specific analytical technique. The numerical values set forth are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, inherently contains certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements.
In typical enzymatic practice of certain embodiments of the methods and use of embodiments of the systems, compositions, and kits of the invention, the present invention enzymatically converts polysaccharides, which can be represented by the glucan repeat unit —C6H10O5—, into hydrogen and carbon dioxide through the following overall (net) reaction:
—C6H10O5— (s)+7H2O (l)-12H2 (g)+6 CO2 (g) [Eq. 1a]
Note that 5 moles of H2 are generated from a glucan repeat unit, while the other 7 moles of H2 come from reacted water. The (s), (l), and (g) tags indicate that the chemical species is in the solid, liquid, and gas phase, respectively. It will be understood that polysaccharides will typically be suspended, substantially solubilized, or completely dissolved in the liquid phase, depending on the particular polysaccharides selected as well as temperature and other conditions.
(C6H10O5)n+H2O+Pi⇄(C6H10O5)n-1+G-1-P [Eq. 2]
G-1-P⇄G-6-P [Eq. 3]
G-6-P+12 NADP++6 H2O⇄12 NADPH+12 H++6 CO2+Pi [Eq. 4]
12 NADPH+12 H+⇄12 H2+12NADP+ [Eq. 5]
In embodiments, the enzymatic pathway of the invention comprises three main blocks: (a)(1) polysaccharide chain-shortening phosphorylation catalyzed by phosphorylases, followed by (a)(2) conversion from glucose-1-phosphate to glucose-6-phosphate catalyzed by phosphoglucomutase; (b) the pentose-phosphate pathway, comprising an oxidative phase, which converts G-6-P to ribulose-5-P, CO2, and NADHP; and a non-oxidative phase, which can regenerate ribulose-5-P to G-6-P; and (c) hydrogen generation from NADPH catalyzed by hydrogenase.
The combination of chain-shortening by glucan phosphorylase and the conversion from G-1-P to G-6-P enables the utilization of the energy stored in glucosidic bonds of polysaccharides. In contrast, conventional hydrolysis of glucosidic bonds of polysaccharides dissipates such energy. Because the gaseous reaction products (H2 and CO2) can be removed from the liquid solution simultaneously, the reaction can be effectively driven forward towards hydrogen production, while the polysaccharide chains are being simultaneously shortened in concurrent reaction paths.
Generally, the overall reaction can be written as
(glucan)n+a H2O→(glucan)n-1+b H2+c CO2 [Eq. 1b]
where the coefficient b defines the yield of hydrogen obtained from the starting polysaccharide. Thermodynamically, the reaction represented by Eq. 1 is a spontaneous process (ΔGO°=−48.9 kJ/mol) and is an endothermic reaction (ΔH°=595.6 kJ/mol) (Atkins and De Paula, 2005). When the gaseous products (H2 and CO2) are continuously removed from the liquid reaction solution, the net reaction (Eq. 1) becomes favorable (in the forward direction) according to Le Chatelier's principle. Therefore, it is preferable to remove at least one of the gaseous products as it is formed; it is especially preferable to remove both products (H2 and CO2) at the same rate that they are formed, to avoid accumulation and favor complete conversion of the polysaccharide.
More water consumed (a>7 in Eq. 1b) will not generate more hydrogen, but rather will tend to cause traditional glucan hydrolysis, producing shorter chains along with dissipation of energy into the solution. Polysaccharide chain-shortening substrate phosphorylation (Eq. 2) utilizes the energy stored in the glucosidic bonds of polysaccharides (15.5 kJ/mol glucosidic bond) to produce the activated phosphorylated monosaccharide (G-1-P) without ATP consumption. In essence, energy that is stored in polysaccharides is channeled to water molecules to break them up and release the energy in the form of hydrogen.
Polysaccharide hydrolysis can be minimized even with excess water present, by using a solution that is substantially free of hydrolytic enzymes (e.g., amylases for starch or cellulases for cellulose). Therefore, in preferred embodiments of the invention, the liquid solution does not contain a significant quantity of active hydrolytic enzymes. Any glycosidic bonds between two glycoside units contain chemical bond energy. Simple hydrolysis of glycosidic bonds for polysaccharides and oligosaccharides dissipates the bond energy of glycosidic bonds. In nature, phosphorylases can conserve the energy by substrate phosphorylation.
Phosphorylases are allosteric enzymes that catalyze the production of glucose-1-phosphate. More generally, phosphorylases are enzymes that catalyze the addition of a phosphate group from an inorganic phosphate to an acceptor. Phosphorylases include EC 2.4.1.1 (1,4-α-glucan phosphorylase, α-glucan phosphorylase, amylopectin phosphorylase, amylophosphorylase, glucan phosphorylase, glucosan phosphorylase, glycogen phosphorylase, maltodextrin phosphorylase); EC 2.4.1.8 (maltose phosphorylase); EC 2.4.1.20 (cellobiose phosphorylase); EC 2.4.1.49 (cellodextrin phosphorylase); and EC 2.4.1.7 (sucrose phosphorylase). Effective phosphorylases can also be selected from enzymes with at least 80% identity, preferably at least 90% identity, to the enzymes recited in this paragraph.
For substrates containing α-1,4-glucosidic bonds, such as starch, the phosphorylation reactions are as follows:
(1,4-α-D-glucosyl)n+Pi+H2O→(1,4-α-D-glucosyl)n-1+G-1-P maltose+Pi+H2O→glucose+G-1-P
For substrates containing β-1,4-glucosidic bonds, such as cellulose, the phosphorylation reactions are as follows:
(1,4-β-D-glucosyl)n+Pi+H2O→(1,4-α-D-glucosyl)n-1+G-1-P cellobiose+Pi+H2O→G-1-P+glucose
After a series of phosphorolysis reactions mediated by phosphorylases, a large amount of G-1-P can be produced reversibly. The removal of G-1-P will lead to chain-shortening reactions.
Phosphoglucomutases are enzymes that create a glucose isomer by changing the site of the phosphate ion, converting between G-1-P and G-6-P. An example of a phosphoglucomutase is the enzyme characterized by EC 5.4.2.2, or an enzyme with at least 80% identity, preferably at least 90% identity, to such as enzyme.
Hydrogenases are enzymes that catalyze the reversible oxidation of molecular hydrogen (H2). Hydrogenases play a vital role in anaerobic metabolism. Hydrogen uptake (H2 oxidation) is coupled to the reduction of electron acceptors such as oxygen, nitrate, sulfate, carbon dioxide, and fumarate, whereas proton reduction (H2 evolution) is essential in pyruvate fermentation and in the disposal of excess electrons. Hydrogenase can produce hydrogen gas from NADPH according to the following reaction:
NADPH+H+→NADP++H2
An example of a hydrogenase is the enzyme characterized by EC 1.12.1.3, or an enzyme with at least 80% identity, preferably at least 90% identity, to such as enzyme. Some embodiments of the invention employ a hydrogenase isolated from a hyper-thermophilic archaebacterium Pyrococcus furiosus (Bryant and Adams, 1989; Ma and Adams, 1994; Ma et al., 1994; Pedroni et al., 1995; Ma et al., 2000). Although the NADPH reduction reaction is not driven spontaneously, the special Pyrococcus furiosus hydrogenase 1 can catalyze NADPH reduction to generate hydrogen in vitro.
The pentose-phosphate pathway consists of an oxidative phase, which converts G-6-P into ribulose-5-P, and a non-oxidative phase, which regenerates G-6-P from ribulose-6-P:
G-6-P+2 NADP++H2O→ribulose-5-P+2 H++CO2+2 NADPH ribulose-5-P-→5/6 G-6-P
In general, selection of a plurality of enzymes that activate the pentose-phosphate pathway is within the skill of an ordinary artisan. One particular embodiment is discussed in Example 1 (see Table 1). Other embodiments employ similar enzymes, such as enzymes with at least 80%, preferably at least 90%, sequence identity to the pentose-phosphate pathway enzymes listed in Table 1 (EC numbers 1.1.1.49, 1.1.1.44, 5.3.1.6, 5.1.3.1, 2.2.1.1, 2.2.1.2, 5.3.1.1, 4.1.2.13, 3.1.3.11, and 5.3.1.9).
In some embodiments, enzymes are added directly into the aqueous solution of polysaccharides. The quantity of enzymes to add depends on the desired reaction temperature and residence time. In general there will be concentration of each particular enzyme above which no further enhancement in reaction rate occurs. The optimal quantity of enzyme will be dictated by overall economics.
The enzymes may be purified (but are not necessarily purified), and they can exist in the form of mixtures of enzymes or enzyme complexes with the desired functions. Enzymes can be added in the form of lysed cells which produced the enzymes in a previous fermentation process. In this case, there could also be cell fragments added to the reactor.
In some embodiments, inorganic phosphate (Pi) and coenzyme (NADPH) are continuously recycled in the system. That is, these substances are produced and consumed at equal rates. A small amount of inorganic phosphate can be added, if necessary, at the beginning of the process in order to initiate phosphorylation. Also, if necessary (due to side reactions or other reasons), additional Pi and/or NADPH can be added at any point within the process.
The pH of the solution is not regarded as particularly critical, but pH will impact the activity of each enzyme in a potentially different way. Also, it is noted that the reaction that generates H2 in the pathway of the invention consumes protons, the concentration of which is controlled by the pH of the solution. A person of ordinary skill in the art can readily perform routine experimentation, given a specific selection of enzymes, to determine the system-optimum pH, or to determine a range of preferred pH values, with respect to H2 yield or production rate. In other words, the process of the invention can comprise adjusting one or more parameters during the reaction to maintain a parameter or optimize a parameter. An illustrative range of preferred pH values for some embodiments is pH=2-12, more preferably 4-9, and most preferably a neutral pH, such as pH 6-8.
Temperature is not regarded as being critical to the present invention. Low to moderate temperatures are appropriate, especially when mesophilic enzymes are chosen. The process can generally be practiced conveniently at one or more temperatures from about 10° C. to about 100° C., preferably from about 25° C. to about 75° C. Each of the enzymes selected will have its own respective functions of activity versus temperature, and the overall optimum temperature will be a function of the specific enzymes chosen. One skilled in the art will recognize that temperatures outside the range of 10° C. to 100° C. could even be employed, such as when thermophilic or psychrophilic enzymes are selected. In some embodiments, no external energy is added, and the temperature will be a function of substrate concentrations, net heats of reactions, and heat losses in the system.
Pressure is also not critical to the present invention, but a skilled artisan will appreciate that the reaction pressure can impact the equilibrium distribution of species. A high pressure, such as several atmospheres, would tend to inhibit product gas evolution. Conversely, a low system pressure will tend to push the equilibrium towards products (hydrogen and carbon dioxide). For convenience, the reactions are preferably conducted at atmospheric pressure. The process could be conducted under a vacuum. Also, the process could be performed in the presence of gases other than those produced or consumed, such as air, nitrogen, helium, argon, and the like.
The process can be conducted in a batch reactor, a continuous reactor, or some combination of the two. A variety of means for agitation (mixing) can be employed, or a plug-flow reactor without internal mixing can be effective. Unconverted reactants (polysaccharides) can be recycled to the reactor inlet, as in known in the art.
With respect to Eq. 1b [(glucan)n+a H2O→(glucan)n-1+b H2+c CO2], a person of ordinary skill in the art will understand that the process can be optimized, without undue experimentation, such that on an overall basis the coefficient a can be about 7, b can be about 12, and c can be about 6. In some embodiments, some side reactions do occur, reducing the yield to H2. In other embodiments, the hydrogen-atom selectivity to H2 is very high (at least about 90%) but the polysaccharide is not completely converted to products, resulting in lower yields. Economics sometimes dictate operating a process at something less than its highest attainable yield.
Optimization can also be carried out to improve the overall reaction rate and the stability of some or all of the enzymes. Such optimization can include, for example, enzyme component optimization via metabolic engineering and modeling; substitution of mesophilic enzymes by recombinant thermophilic or even hyperthermophilic enzymes; protein engineering to improve enzyme activity and/or selectivity; higher concentrations of enzymes and substrates; variation of process parameters such as pH and temperature; stabilization of enzymes through additives; enzyme immobilization; and development of minimal microorganisms to create an in vivo enzyme system that produces H2. It is within the skill of a person of ordinary skill in the enzyme art to conduct such optimization, and the present invention is intended to include this type of experimentation. Statistical experimental design can be employed to explore global response surfaces and establish models of H2 yield and rate versus process and enzyme factors as well as interaction effects.
As mentioned above, one aspect of the invention is a kit for performing the methods of the invention. In general, the kits are kits for generating and collecting hydrogen gas. The kits of the invention comprise some or all of the components necessary to practice one or more embodiment of the methods of the invention. Thus, a kit of the invention can comprise one or more of: (a) one or more enzymes with some phosphorylase activity; (b) one or more enzymes with some phosphoglucomutase activity; (c) one or more enzymes with some hydrogenase activity; (d) a container for combining a polysaccharide, water, and the enzymes from elements (a), (b), and (c); (e) means for heating the container to between about 10-100° C.; and (f) means for collecting or using some of the hydrogen gas that evolves from the container. The kits of the invention can also contain an enzyme composition as described above.
The enzymes, reagents, and additives (if desired) and other components can be provided in one or more suitable containers within the kit. The kit can comprise sufficient components to perform the method of the invention a single time or multiple times. Kits can be fabricated from any suitable material, such as plastic, glass, and metal.
Hydrogen has a number of possible uses. Molecular hydrogen is used for the production of ammonia; in petroleum refining, where H2 is used throughout a typical refinery; in the chemical-synthesis industries, when conversion of a double carbon-carbon bond to a single C—C bond is desired, or of a triple carbon-carbon bond to a single or double bond; in the food industry for hydrogenation of vegetable oils; and in electronic-circuitry manufacture. Hydrogen is also used extensively today to make methanol, fertilizers, glass, refined metals, vitamins, cosmetics, soaps, lubricants, and cleaners. Further, pure hydrogen is an excellent fuel, both in traditional combustion engines as well as in fuel cells, and produces only water vapor when oxidized with oxygen. Liquid hydrogen can also be used as a fuel, such as in space vehicles.
The hydrogen produced by the process of the present invention can be separated from other substances (e.g., carbon dioxide) completely or partially, or it can be used in conjunction with the other substance(s). When it is desired to separate at least some of the CO2 from the H2, a variety of separation techniques are known. One such technique employs separation by molecular sieves. It would also be possible to separate CO2 from H2 using cryogenic distillation, for example.
An example of direct use of H2/CO2 mixtures is acetate production from H2 and CO2 using Clostridium aceticum, as is known in the art. Other means of biochemically, or chemically, converting H2/CO2 mixtures of various concentrations are also known.
The present invention will now be further characterized and described by reference to the following non-limiting example, which is intended to be purely exemplary of the invention, and is not to be understood as limiting the invention in any way. In summary, the following paragraphs will describe illustrative enzyme selections and experimental procedures that demonstrate one embodiment of the invention.
Enzymatic Production of H2 and CO2 from Starch and Water
To exemplify the practical nature of the present methods, systems, and compositions, starch was converted to hydrogen and carbon dioxide in a process according to the present invention. Experiments were carried out in a continuous flow system with the moisture traps cooled with ice. All chemicals and enzymes were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (U.S.A.), unless otherwise noted. All enzymes and their catalysis reactions are listed in Table 1. The working volume of the custom reactor was 2 mL. The system was continuously purged with helium at a flow rate of 50 mL/min. The temperature of the jacketed reaction vessel was maintained at 30° C. with a Polyscience (Niles, Ill.) circulating water bath.
S. cerevisiae
S. cerevisiae
S. cerevisiae
E. coli
S. cerevisiae
E. coli
S. cerevisiae
P. furiosus
P. furiosus
Data collection and analysis was carried out with ASYST 4.0 software (ASYST Technologies, Inc., Rochester, N.Y.). The integrated molar/molar yields of hydrogen (YH2) and carbon dioxide (YCO2) were calculated as
in which rH2 and rCO2 are the volumetric production rates in mmole of H2 or CO2 per liter of reaction volume per hour, and ΔGE is the net consumption of glucose equivalents in mM.
Residual G-6-P can be measured using Sigma glucose HK kit. The mixtures were incubated at 35° C. for 5 minutes and the change in absorbance at 340 nm was determined. The residual starch, G-1-P, and G-6-P were hydrolyzed to glucose by addition of dilute H2SO4 and hydrolysis at 121° C. for 1 hour. The neutralized glucose solutions were measured by a glucose HK kit.
The solution contained 1 unit of each of the pentose phosphate cycle enzymes, approximately 70 units of P. furiosus hydrogenase, 10 units of α-glucan phosphorylase, 10 units of phosphoglucomutase, 4 mM phosphate, 0.5 mM thiamine pyrophosphate, 2 mM NADP+, 10 mM MgCl2, and 0.5 mM MnCl2 in 2.0 mL of 0.1 M HEPES buffer (pH 7.5). The experiment was conducted at about 30° C.
Although illustrative embodiments and various modifications thereof have been described in detail herein, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the present application need not be limited to these precise embodiments and the described modifications, and that various changes and further modifications may be practiced without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention as defined in the appended claims. Other embodiments will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, including embodiments that do not provide all of the features and advantages set forth herein.
Alper J., Science 2003, 299:1686-1687.
Atkins P. W., Physical Chemistry (fourth edition). New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.; 1990.
Atkins P. W. and De Paula J. Elements of Physical Chemistry (4th edition). New York: W. H. Freeman & Co. (2005), 605-613.
Benemann et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 70:2317, 1973.
Berg J. M. et al., Biochemistry (fifth edition). New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.; 2002.
Bryant F. O. and Adams M. W. W, J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264:5070-5079.
Cortright R. D. et al., Nature 2002, 418:964-967.
Deluga G. A. et al., Science 2004 , 303:993-997.
Farrell A. E. et al., Science 2006, 311:506-508.
Hoffert M. I. et al., Science 2002, 298:981-987.
Huber G. W. et al., Science 2003, 300:2075-2077.
Klein and Betz, Plant Physiol. 61:953, 1978.
Lynd L. R. et al., Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66:506-577.
Lynd L. R. et al., Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2005, 16:577-583.
Lynd L. R. et al., in Cellulosome. Edited by Kataeva IA: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.; 2006.
Ma K. and Adams M.W., J. Bacteriol. 1994, 176:6509-6517.
Ma K. et al., FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1994, 122:245-250.
Ma K. et al., J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182:1864-1871.
Markov et al., Advances in Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology 52:60, 1995.
Morris D., J. Sci. Food Agric. 86:1743-1746 (2006).
Muir M. etal., J. Bacteriol. 1985, 163:1237-1242.
Nelson D. L. and Cox M. M., Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry (third edition). New York: Worth Publishers; 2000.
Pedroni P. et al., Microbiol. 1995, 141:449-458.
Rao et al., Biochimie 60:291, 1978.
Rosen and Krasna, Photochem. Photobiol. 31:259, 1980.
United States Department of Energy: “Basic Research Needs for the Hydrogen Economy” (2004) published at http://www.sc.doe.gov/bes/hydrogen.pdf.
Vatsala and Seshadri, Proc. Indian Nat'l Sci. Acad. B51:282, 1985.
Woodward J. et al., Nat. Biotechnol. 1996, 14:872-874.
Woodward J. et al., Nature 2000, 405:1014-1015.
Woodward J. et al., Energy Fuels 2000, 14:197-201.
Zhang Y.-H. P. and Lynd L. R., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70:1563-1569.
Zhang Y.-H. P. and Lynd L. R., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:7321-7325.
Zhang Y.-H. P. and Lynd L. R., Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 70:123-129.
This application relies on the disclosure of and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/799,685, filed May 12, 2006, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60799685 | May 2006 | US |
