Biological Materials and Uses Thereof

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20110165277
  • Publication Number
    20110165277
  • Date Filed
    June 19, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Published
    July 07, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
There is provided the use of a sandalwood extract or a sandalwood analogue as an additive to animal foodstuff for the reduction of methane production, reduction of bacterial mediated protein breakdown and reduces bacterial growth in the stomach. There are also provided food products and methods of making food products incorporating sandalwood extracts or sandalwood analogues.
Description

The present invention relates to additives for animal foodstuffs and to methods for beneficially regulating ruminant digestion.


The supply of antibiotic growth promoters to farm animals is a well known method in agriculture for increasing the yield of meat or diary produce. The term “antibiotic growth promoter” is used to describe any medicine that destroys or inhibits bacteria and is administered at a low, sub-therapeutic dose. Infectious agents reduce the yield of farmed food animals and, to control these, the administration of sub-therapeutic antibiotics and antimicrobial agents has been shown to be effective. Although the mechanism underpinning their action is unclear, it is believed that the antibiotics suppress sensitive populations of bacteria in the intestines.


It has been estimated that as much as six percent of the net energy in the pig diet could be lost due to microbial fermentation in the intestine. If the microbial population could be better controlled, it is possible that the lost energy could be diverted to growth. Similarly upwards of ten percent of the energy in the diet of cattle and sheep is lost through the production of methane during microbial fermentation, decreasing methane production in the rumen using antimicrobial agents not only diverts this energy to meat and milk production but also lower the production of this harmful greenhouse gas. Whatever the mechanism of action, the use of growth promoters results in an improvement in daily growth rates between one and ten percent resulting in meat of a better quality, with less fat and increased protein content.


Currently, there is some unease surrounding the use of growth promoters in animals destined for meat production, as overuse of any antibiotic over a period of time may lead to the local bacterial populations becoming resistant to the antibiotic. Human health is potentially also directly affected through residues of an antibiotic in meat, which may cause side-effects.


In response to growing concerns regarding the effects of antibiotic growth promoters on human health, in January 2006 the European Union effectively prohibited on the use of antibiotics as growth promoters in animal agriculture. As such, there is currently an unsatisfied demand for alternatives to antibiotics. Livestock producers must find alternative means of obtaining similar production benefits to maintain and improve the standards and quantities of livestock products but also to maintain the profitability and competitiveness of the livestock industry. Some countries around the world, including the USA, do not currently have restrictions on the use of antibiotics as growth promoters in animal agriculture, however such restrictions may exist in the near future and there is also a need to improve those livestock that are treated with antibiotics. Ways must also be found to improve the healthiness and safety of animal products reaching the consumer, including those from organic farming.


There are also important social issues concerning the removal of antibiotic growth promoters including possible higher cost of production being passed to the consumer and the risks to both human and animal health through the greater prevalence of pathogenic organisms in the animal. These factors will drive the rapid acceptance of new products, providing they are efficacious.


We have identified a plant extract (selected from a screening of almost 2500 such compounds) that beneficially manipulates digestion in the gut of ruminant livestock to promote the economic, safe and environmentally friendly production of meat and milk. Specifically the extract of interest prevents the growth of E. coli 0157 and Listeria monocytogenes in the rumen; reduces the rate of protein breakdown (allowing more protein to be absorbed by the gut of the animal and thus boosting production); and decreases the emission of,the important greenhouse gas methane.


A first aspect of the invention provides the use of a sandalwood extract or a sandalwood analogue as an additive to animal foodstuff.


Sandalwood extract is an essential oil extracted from trees in the genus Santalum. The extract has commonly been used for incense, aromatherapy and as an ingredient in perfume. Sandalwood essential oil has also been used in medicine, mostly as a urogenital and skin antiseptic. Its main component, santalols, has known antimicrobial properties. However, it has not previously been suggested that sandalwood extract could beneficially manipulate ruminant digestion in the gut of ruminant livestock.


As disclosed herein, the inventors have determined that sandalwood extract prevents the growth of E. coli 0157 and Listeria monocytogenes in the digestive system of ruminants. In addition there is also a reduction in protein breakdown in the rumen, which allows more protein to be absorbed thus boosting meat and milk production, and a decrease in the emission of methane from the rumen. Therefore sandalwood extract can be used as an additive to animal foodstuff in order to bring about important and beneficial changes in ruminant digestion.


It is important to note that the beneficial properties of sandalwood extract are not common to all extracts or compounds having antimicrobial properties. For example, during our trials we have tested some 2500 plant extracts including numerous essential oil compounds without finding a comparable extract.


By “sandalwood extract” we include where the extract is the essential oil prepared from trees of the genus Santalum. The extract can be obtained commercially from very many sources. Examples of sandalwood extract that can be used in the present invention include: Sandalwood oil manufactured by SAFC (e.g. W30,050-0 lot no. 03722CC-396) and Sandalwood oil manufactured by Fluka (355263/1 lot no. 52706264), Sandalwood oil from Swiss Herbal Remedies (B/N 540).


By “sandalwood analogue” we mean a compound or mixture of compounds that resembles sandalwood on the basis of smell (see, for example, Bieri et al (2004) Chem Senses. 29(6):483-7 Olfactory receptor neuron profiling using sandalwood odorants). Such analogues include natural analogues extracted from natural sources such as essential oils and synthetic sandalwood replacement compounds or mixtures. Examples of synthetic replacements include Javanol™ (e.g. from Givaudan lot nos. 9000591570 and 90000635339) and Santaliff™ (e.g. from International Flavour and Fragrances lot no. R000485362). Further alternatives are readily available and a number of these alternatives are discussed further in the examples.


Such compositions contain chemical compounds having the structures:




embedded image


where:

  • α-Santalol: R═OH




embedded image


where

  • for β-Santalol : R═CH2OH and R1═H
  • for E-cis-epi-β-Santalol: R═H and R1═CH2OH


    and for those chemical analogues based on campholenic aldehyde:




embedded image


where:

  • R=3 methyl pentanol=Sandalore:
  • R=3-methyl pent-4-en-2-ol=Ebanol
  • R=(E)-2-methylbut-2-en-1-ol=Santaliff
  • R=(E)-2-ethylbut-2-en-1-ol=Bacdanol and Sanjinol isomers


Other R groups are possible, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art.


As discussed above, sandalwood extract or analogues thereof can be used to bring about these important and beneficial changes in ruminant digestion. Hence it is preferred that it used as an additive in ruminant diets although it may also be beneficial in monogastric animals such as horses.


A ruminant is an animal that digests its food in two steps: first by eating the raw material and regurgitating a semi-digested form known as a cud, then eating the cud, a process called ruminating. Ruminants have a stomach with four chambers,.which are the rumen, reticulum, omasum and abomasum. In the first two chambers, the rumen and the reticulum, the food is mixed with saliva and separates into layers of solid and liquid material. Solids clump together to form the cud (or bolus). The cud is then regurgitated, chewed slowly to completely mix it with saliva, which further breaks down fibers. Fibre, especially cellulose, is broken down into glucose in these chambers by symbiotic bacteria, protozoa and fungi. The broken-down fiber, which is now in the liquid part of the contents, then passes through the rumen into the next stomach chamber, the omasum, where water is removed. After this the digesting food is moved to the last chamber, the abomasum. The food in the abomasum is digested much like it would be in the human stomach. It is finally sent to the small intestine, where the absorption of the nutrients occurs.


Almost all the glucose produced by the breaking down of cellulose is used by the symbiotic bacteria. Ruminants get their energy from the volatile fatty acids produced by these bacteria: lactic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid.


Ruminant animals include include cattle, goats, sheep, camels, llamas, giraffes, bison, buffalo, deer, wildebeest and antelope. Preferably the sandalwood extract is used as an additive for foodstuffs for domesticated livestock such as cattle, goats, sheep or llamas.


The sandalwood extract or analogue can be added to the foodstuff after the foodstuff has been prepared or during preparation of the foodstuff.


Preferably the foodstuff is suitable for administration to an animal, particularly a ruminant or horse. Whilst note exclusive examples of foodstuffs to which the sandalwood extract can be added include: total mixed rations (TMR) ensiled and fresh forage, grains, manufactured concentrates protein supplement and by-products. However it is likely that the preferred method of addition would be via premixes and mineral and vitamin supplements either incorporated into diets of off or on farm.


The amount of sandalwood extract or analogue used in the invention is between 0.025 g per day and 50 g per day. Preferred amounts are between 0.5 and 50 g/day for larger ruminants e.g. cattle, preferably 5 g/day. Further preferred amounts are between 0.025 g and 2.5 g/day for small ruminants such as sheep preferably 0.25 g/day.


These amounts can alternatively be expressed as 25 mg/kg-50 g/kg, preferably 500 mg/kg.


A further method of the invention provides a method for reducing the growth of pathogenic bacteria in the digestive system of a ruminant or horse comprising supplying the ruminant or horse with sandalwood extract or an analogue thereof.


As set out in the accompanying examples, sandalwood extract or an analogue thereof acts within the digestive system to reduce pathogenic bacterial growth. The reduction in pathogenic bacterial growth caused by the method of the invention is beneficial as there is also a reduction in bacterial levels in meat derived from ruminants. Since some bacteria pose significant hazards to human health, for example E. coli, then the method of the invention can be useful in improving the hygiene of meat. A preferred embodiment of this aspect of the invention is wherein bacterial growth is reduced in the rumen.


By “reducing” we include that the sandalwood extract reduces bacterial growth by 25% in comparison to a reference sample.


Preferably the method of this aspect of the invention reduces E. coli and/or Listeria monocytogenes growth.


Sandalwood extract or an analogue thereof is supplied to a ruminant or horse as part of the method of this aspect of the invention. Examples of sandalwood extract as an additive are described above and are suitable for use in the method of the invention. Preferably the method of this aspect of the invention uses the animal foodstuff set out above.


A further aspect of the invention provides a method of increasing meat and/or milk production from a ruminant or horse comprising supplying the ruminant or horse with sandalwood extract or an analogue thereof.


A still further method of the invention provides a method for reducing protein breakdown in the digestive system of a ruminant or horse comprising supplying the ruminant or horse with sandalwood extract or an analogue thereof.


By “increasing meat and/or milk production” we include that the sandalwood extract or an analogue thereof increases meat and/or milk production by at least 5-10% of the weight or volume of the product, in comparison to a reference sample.


By “reducing protein breakdown in the digestive system” we include that the sandalwood extract or an analogue thereof reduces protein breakdown in the digestive system by 10-20% in comparison to a reference sample.


As set out in the accompanying examples, sandalwood extract or an analogue thereof acts within the digestive system to decrease in protein degradation in the gut and hence increase protein absorption by the animal. The increase in protein absorption leads to increased meat and/or milk production from the ruminant or horse and/or reduced feeding costs.


An embodiment of the method of the invention is wherein protein breakdown is reduced in the rumen.


A further method of the invention provides a method of reducing methane emission by a ruminant or horse comprising supplying the ruminant or horse with sandalwood extract or an analogue thereof.


Sandalwood extract or an analogue thereof can be supplied to a ruminant or horse as part of the methods of these aspects of the invention. Examples of sandalwood extract or an analogue thereof as an additive are described above and are suitable for use in these methods of the invention. Preferably these methods of the invention use the animal foodstuff set out above.


A further aspect of the invention provides the use of sandalwood extract or an analogue thereof to reduce the growth of pathogenic bacteria in the digestive system of a ruminant or horse.


A further aspect of the invention provides the use of sandalwood extract or an analogue thereof to increase meat and/or milk production from a ruminant or horse.


A further aspect of the invention provides the use of sandalwood extract or an analogue thereof to reduce protein breakdown in the digestive system of a ruminant or horse.


A further aspect of the invention provides the use of sandalwood extract or an analogue thereof to reduce methane emission by a ruminant or horse.


Preferably the sandalwood analogue of any aspect of the invention has the structure:




embedded image


where:

  • R═OH


Alternatively, the sandalwood analogue of any aspect of the invention has the structure:




embedded image


where

  • R═CH2OH and R1═H; or
  • R═H and R1═CH2OH


Further alternatively, the sandalwood analogue of any aspect of the invention has the structure:




embedded image


where:


R=3 methyl pentanol, 3-methyl pent-4-en-2-ol, (E)-2-methylbut-2-en-1-ol, or (E)-2-ethylbut-2-en-1-ol





The invention will now be described in more detail, for the purposes of illustration only, in the following Examples and Figures.


FIG. 1—The effect of 500 μg/ml Sandalwood Oil on the breakdown of S. bovis protein in rumen fluid.


FIG. 2—Effect of Sandalwood Oil on the decline of E. coli 0157 in the rumen simulation fermentor Rusitec


FIG. 3—Effect of Sandalwood Oil on the decline of Listeria monocytogenes in the rumen simulation fermentor Rusitec


FIG. 4—shows the results of the methane production, and demonstrates that the Sandalwood oil from Fluka and both batches of Javanol and Santalifff when compared to the control experiments significantly decreased methane


FIG. 5—Sandalwood oil and Javanol effect on methane production.


FIG. 6—Chemical structures of:


i) α-Santalol


(5-(2,3-dimethyl-tricyclo[2.2.1.02,6]hept-3-yl)-2-methyl-pent-2-en-1-ol)


ii) β-Santalol


(2-methyl-5-(2-methyl-3-methylene- bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-yl-pent-2-en-1-ol)


iii) α-Santalene


(1,7-dimethyl-7-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)-tricyclo[2.2.1.0(2,6)]heptane)


iv) Z-α-trans-β-Bergamotol


(1S-(1a.,5a.,6a.(Z)-5-(2,6-dimethylbicyclo(3.1.1)hept-2-en-6-yl)-2-methyl-2-pentem-1-ol


v) E-cis,epi-β-Santalol


(2-methyl-5-((1R,2R,4S)-2-methyl-3 -methylenebicyclo(2.2.1)hept-2-yl)-(2Z)-2-penten-1-ol)


vi) cis-Nuciferol


(S—(Z)-2-methyl-6-(4-methylphenyl)-2-hepten-1-ol)


vii) Farnesol (trans,trans)


(E,E) 3,7,11-trimethyl-2,6,10-dodectrien-1-ol


FIG. 7—Chemical structures of:


i) Javanol1


(1-Methyl-2-(1,2,2-trimethylbicyclo[3.1.0]hex-3-ylmethyl)cyclopropyl)methanol


ii) Sandalore


5-(2,2,3-Trimethyl-3-cyclopentenhyl)-3-methylpentan-2-ol


iii) Ebanol


3-Methyl-5-(2,2,3-trimethyl-3-cyclopenten-1-yl)-4-penten-2-ol


iv) Sandela2


4-(5,5,6-Trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-yl)cyclohexan-1-ol


FIG. 8—Chemical structures of:


(i) Santaliff


(2-Methyl-4-(2,2,3-trimethyl-3-cyclopenten-1-yl)-2-buten-1-ol)


(ii) Bacdanol1


(2-ethyl-4-(2,2,3-trimethyl-3-cyclopenten-1-yl)-2-buten-1-ol)


(iii) Sanjinol1


(2-ethyl-4(2,2,3-trimethyl-3-cyclopentenyl)-2-buten-1-ol)



FIG. 9 Sandalwood oil (Swiss Herbal Remedies)


FIG. 10—Sandalwood Oil (sample D, SAFC)


FIG. 11—Sandalwood Oil Sample (sample E, Fluka)


FIG. 12—Purity of chemical analogues by gc-ms: Javanol (sample A)


FIG. 13—Purity of chemical analogues by gc-ms: Javanol (sample B)


FIG. 14—Determination of Purity of Santaliff BHT by gc-ms (sample C)


FIG. 15—Purity of farnesol (trans,trans) standards by gc-ms





EXAMPLE 1
Effects of Sandalwood Oil on Methane Production from Extracted Rumen Fluid

An initial screening of Sandalwood oil for it effects on volatile fatty acid and methane production in the rumen was carried out.


Thirty ml of a 33% buffered solution of rumen fluid withdrawn from a rumen canulated cow was incubated with 0.3 g of a 50:50 hay barley mix at 39° C. under anaerobic conditions.


After 16 hours the volume of gas produced and the percentage of methane in the headspace was measured and the resultant fermentation fluid was analysed for volatile fatty acids by HPLC.


Sandalwood oil, and control oils of commercial essential oil mixes or pure oils of eugenol or cinnamaldehyde were added in the amount of 500 μg/ml to the 30 ml buffered solution of rumen fluid prior to incubation. Sandalwood oil was obtained from Cardiff University and Sigma [SAFC (e.g. W30,050-0 lot no. 03722CC-396) and Sandalwood oil manufactured by Fluka (355263/1 lot no. 52706264).]


Table 1 shows the results of the methane production and HPLC analysis, and demonstrates that the Sandalwood oil when compared to the control experiments significantly decreased methane production and stimulated propionate production at the expense of acetate formation.









TABLE 1







Effect of essential oils (500 μg/ml) on total volatile


fatty acid and methane production by rumen fluid
















Total







volatile



Acetate
Propionate
Butyrate
fatty acids
Methane









formation μmole/g of feed
















Cinnamaldehyde
2832
492
73
3398
1471


Eugenol
2817
590
73
3479
1436


Citral
2754
534
72
3361
1461


Essential oil mix 1
2816
479
72
3367
1455


Essential oil mix 2
2559
460
77
3095
1411


Essential oil mix 3
2727
485
97
3309
1480


Sandalwood oil

  2266a

1083a 
61
3410

  1089a



Control
2768
519
75
3362
1446


Standard error
    228.7***
    99.1***
12.9***
211.3***
    97.7***


difference (SED)






a= Different substrates significantly differing from the mean



***= P > 0.001






EXAMPLE 2
Influence of Sandalwood Oil on Breakdown of Labelled Bacteria

In a further screen the ability of the Sandalwood oil to prevent the breakdown of bacteria by protozoa in the rumen was tested using the methods described by Wallace and McPherson (1987) Br J Nutr., 58, pp 313-23. Briefly, the rumen bacterium Streptococcus bovis (S. bovis) was radio-labelled by growing it in a minimal media with 14C-lysine as the only available nitrogen source.


The labelled S. bovis were washed and then incubated anaerobically in rumen fluid at 39° C. for 3 h in the presence or absence of 500 μg/ml Sandalwood oil. The release of C14 was monitored by liquid scintillation spectrometry.


Sandalwood oil caused a significant decrease in the breakdown of the labelled S. bovis suggesting that addition of Sandalwood oil reduced bacterial protein turnover in the rumen (FIG. 1).


EXAMPLE 3
Rusitec Simulation

Further investigations of the action of Sandalwood oil were undertaken in the rumen simulation technique Rusitec. Rusitec was developed by Czerkawski and colleagues (Czerkawski and Breckenridge (1977) Br J Nutr. 38 , 371-84) as a long term simulation of rumen fermentation and has been used extensively to test feed additive for ruminants.


Simulation 1


The rumen-simulation technique (Rusitec) was used as described by Czerkawski and Breckenridge (1977).


The nominal volume in each reaction vessel was 850 ml and the dilution rate was set at 0.88 per day, the infused liquid being artificial saliva (McDougall, Biochem J 1948 43, 99-109) at pH 8.4. Inocula for the fermentation vessels were obtained from a pooled sample (liquid and particulate rumen contents) from three rumen-cannulated cattle fed on a conserved diet.


On the first day of the experiment 300 ml of strained rumen fluid, 300 ml of water and 300 ml of artificial saliva were placed in each reaction vessel. Solid rumen contents (80 g) were weighed into a nylon bag and one of these was placed inside the food container in each vessel together with a bag (20 g/d) of a basal diet of grass hay, barley, molasses, soyabean meal and a vitamin and mineral mixture. The food was provided in nylon bags, pore size 50 μm, which were gently agitated in the liquid phase. Two bags were present at any time and one bag was replaced each day to give a 48 h incubation.


The bags that were removed from the vessels were placed in plastic bags, and their contents washed and squeezed with 40 ml of artificial saliva. This was done twice for each bag, and the combined washings were poured back into the reaction vessels. Fermentation vessels were flushed with anaerobic grade CO2 before filling, after filling, and then every day during feeding (when the nylon bags with the food were changed).


The duration of the experiment was 11 days, during which four vessels received Sandalwood oil (Fluka) (added the basal diet to reach an initial concentration of 333 μg/ml) the remaining vessels were controls.


Volatile fatty acids, ammonia and bacterial numbers were measured on days 10 and 11 of the experiment. On day 11 a non verotoxin containing strain of E. coli 0157 was added and it numbers traced over the last 24 hr of the experiment.


Simulation 2


In a second experiment a very similar protocol to simulation 1 was followed however 12 vessels were used and Sandalwood oil was added the basal diet to reach an initial concentrations of 0, 5, 50 or 500 μg/ml in triplicate vessels and the Sandalwood oil was sourced from Sigma Chemicals Ltd. The cattle used to provide the initial inoculum were grazing and a different source of hay and soyabean meal were used in the basal diet. The decline in the pathogen Listeria monocytogenes rather than E. coli 0157 was monitored.









TABLE 2







Effect of Sandalwood oil on daily volatile fatty acid


production in the rumen simulation fermentor Rusitec









Sandalwood oil concentration μg/ml











0
333
SED
















Acetate mmol/d
16.2
15.1
0.90



Propionate mmol/d
12.2
12.1
0.92



Butyrate mmol/d
4.2
3.8
0.41



Total VFA mmol/d
32.6
30.9
2.10

















TABLE 3







Effect of Sandalwood oil on daily ammonia and methane production


and bacterial numbers in the rumen simulation fermentor Rusitec









Sandalwood concentration μg/ml











0
333
SED














Vessel pH
6.8
6.8
0.03


NH3 mmol/d
32.3
20.7
1.71


CH4 mmol/d
1.0
0.77
0.131


24 h DM degradation %
21.5
22.4
6.70


48 h DM degradation %
35.1
35.4
6.03


Bacteria counts


Total/ml
 5.0 × 109
 6.0 × 109
0.26 × 109


Log cellulolytic
8.39
7.33
0.350


(Back transformed
(2.45 × 108)
(0.21 × 108)


means/ml)
















TABLE 4







Effect of Sandalwood oil on daily volatile fatty acid


production in the rumen simulation fermentor Rusitec









Sandalwood Oil concentration (ug/ml)













0
5
50
500
SED
















Acetate mmol/d
26.5
23.1
23.9
25.9
3.60


Propionate mmol/d
23.5
22.6
23.0
30.2
3.269


Butyrate mmol/d
11.1
7.9
10.2
8.8
3.09


Total VFA mmol/d
65.3
60.0
60.5
78.0
13.32
















TABLE 5







Effect of Sandalwood oil on daily ammonia and methane production


and bacterial numbers in the rumen simulation fermentor Rusitec









Sandalwood Oil concentration (ug/ml)













0
5
50
500
SED
















Vessel pH
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
0.05


NH3 mmol/d
439
511
458
138
118.3


CH4 mmol/d
4.5
2.7
2.4
2.1
0.35


24 h
16.5
23.5
15.4
18.5
9.29


degradation


%


48 h
38.6
32.7
26.7
30.0
5.44


degradation


%


Bacteria


counts


Total/ml

1 × 109


1 × 109


2 × 109


3 × 109

 9.4 × 108


Cellulolytic/
8.6 × 106
2.3 × 106
8.7 × 106
4.0 × 106
3.49 × 106


ml









Sandalwood oil had no effect on VFA production in either experiment (Tables 2 and 4). Ammonia production was reduced by Sandalwood oil added at either 333 or 500 μg/ml but not lower concentrations (Tables 3 and 5).


Methane production was decreased by all concentration above 5 μg/ml (Tables 3 and 5). In the 1st experiment 333 μg/ml of Sandalwood oil significantly reduced the survival of E. coli 0157 in the fermentor (FIG. 2) whilst in the second experiment Sandalwood oil at 50 or 500 μg/ml significantly reduced Listeria monocytogenes survival at 24 h after pathogen addition (FIG. 3).


Therefore, at between 50 and 500 μg/ml Sandalwood oil significantly reduced the production of methane an important greenhouse gas and also major energy loss from the animal. At concentrations above 333 μg/ml Sandalwood oil significantly decreased ammonia production suggesting a protein sparing effect. Sandalwood oil also significantly reduced the ability of the pathogens E. coli 0157 and Listeria monocytogenes to survive in the fermentor.


EXAMPLE 4
Methane Reduction in Response to Sandalwood Oil and Synthetic Sandalwood Oil Replacements

Thirty ml of a 33% buffered solution of rumen fluid withdrawn from a rumen canulated cow was incubated with 0.3 g of a 50:50 hay barley mix at 39° C. under anaerobic conditions


After 16 hours the volume of gas produced and the percentage of methane in the headspace was measured and the resultant fermentation fluid was analysed for volatile fatty acids by HPLC.


Sandalwood oil from either Fluka or SAFC and two different batches of Javanol (Givaudan) or a single batch of Santaliff (International Flavors & Fragrances) (both Javanol and Santaliff are artifical Sandalwood replacements) were added in the amount of 5, 50 or 100 or 500 pg/ml to the 30 ml buffered solution of rumen fluid prior to incubation.



FIG. 4 shows the results of the methane production, and demonstrates that the Sandalwood oil from Fluka and both batches of Javanol and Santalifff when compared to the control experiments significantly decreased methane.


EXAMPLE 5
Rusitec Experiments Using Sandalwood Oil and Synthetic Sandalwood Oil Replacements

The rumen-simulation technique (Rusitec) was used as described by Czerkawski and Breckenridge (1977).


The nominal volume in each reaction vessel was 850 ml and the dilution rate was set at 0.88 per day, the infused liquid being artificial saliva (McDougall, Biochem J 1948 43, 99-109) at pH 8.4. Inocula for the fermentation vessels were obtained from a pooled sample (liquid and particulate rumen contents) from three rumen-cannulated cattle fed on a conserved diet.


On the first day of the experiment 300 ml of strained rumen fluid, 300 ml of water and 300 ml of artificial saliva were placed in each reaction vessel. Solid rumen contents (80 g) were weighed into a nylon bag and one of these was placed inside the food container in each vessel together with a bag (20 g/d) of a basal diet of grass hay, barley, molasses, soyabean meal and a vitamin and mineral mixture. The food was provided in nylon bags, pore size 50 μm, which were gently agitated in the liquid phase. Two bags were present at any time and one bag was replaced each day to give a 48 h incubation.


The bags that were removed from the vessels were placed in plastic bags, and their contents washed and squeezed with 40 ml of artificial saliva. This was done twice for each bag, and the combined washings were poured back into the reaction vessels. Fermentation vessels were flushed with anaerobic grade CO2 before filling, after filling, and then every day during feeding (when the nylon bags with the food were changed).


The duration of the experiment was 19 days, during which four vessels received Sandalwood oil (added the basal diet to reach an initial concentration of 100 μg/ml) four vessels received Javanol (added the basal diet to reach an initial concentration of 100 μg/ml) the remaining vessels were controls.


Volatile fatty acids, methane and bacterial numbers were measured on days 18 and 19 of the experiment. On day 19, Listeria inocula was added and it numbers traced over the last 24 hr of the experiment.














TABLE 6







Control
Javanol
Sandalwood
SED




















pH
6.70
6.66
6.67
0.022


CH4 mmol/d
3.42
2.51
2.36
0.365


24 h DM degradation (5
21.7
24.7
23.9
3.47


48 g DM degradation (%)
28.4
33.6
31.8
5.10


Bacteria counts


Total × 109/ml
6.1
4.9
7.6
2.69


Cellulolytic × 106/ml
1.6
1.9
1.8
0.25





















TABLE 7







Control
Javanol
Sandalwood
SED




















Acetate mmol/d
21.2
23.9
21.4
2.70


Propionate mmol/d
14.5
16.7
13.4
1.86


Butyrate mmol/d
5.8
4.4
4.6
1.89


Total VFA mmol/d
41.5
45.0
39.4
2.83









Sandalwood oil and Javanol had no effect on VFA production. Methane production was decreased by both Sandalwood oil and Javanol. Sandalwood oil but not Javanol tended (P>0.08) to decrease Listeria monocytogenes survival at 24h after pathogen addition (FIG. 5).


EXAMPLE 6
Chemical Analysis of Sandalwood Oils and Synthetic Sandalwood Oil Replacements Used in Examples

Materials and Methods


Plant Extracts and Chemical Analogues


The sandalwood oil used was sourced from Swiss Herbal Remedies (B/N 540), Sigma-Aldrich Fine Chemicals Limited (SAFC) and Fluka (Dorset).


Chemical analogues based on the chemical structure of β-santalol, include Santaliff™ (supplier International Flavour and Fragrances, lot no: 8000485362) and Javanol™ (supplier Givaudan, lot no's: 9000591570 and 90000635339)—see FIGS. 7 and 8 for their chemical structures.


Farnesol (trans,trans) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Poole, Dorset).


Sample Preparation


Sandalwood Oils


A 3 μl aliquot of sandalwood oil was transferred to a glass container and 1 ml of absolute ethanol added. The mixture was vortex mixed for one minute. A 100 μl aliquot of this mixture was transferred to another glass container and 300 μl of ethanol added, yielding a final sandalwood concentration of 0.075% v/v


Chemical Analogues


A 5 ul aliquot of sample was transferred to a glass container and 5 ml of absolute ethanol added giving a final concentration of 0.1% v/v.


Farnesol Standards


3 μl of farnesol was transferred to a glass container containing 1 ml of absolute ethanol added and vortex mixed for one minute yielding a final concentration of 0.3% v/v.


Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)


Samples were analysed using an Agilent Technologies 6890N gas chromatograph equipped with an Agilent 5973 Network mass selective detector and an Agilent 7683 series autosampler. A non-polar Phenomenex ZB5MS fused silica capillary column (supplier: Phenomenex) was used with the following dimensions: 30 m×0.25 mm id. and 0.25 μm film thickness.


The oven temperature was programmed from 50° C. to 240° C. at a rate of 3° C. min−1 and maintained at this final temperature for five minutes. The helium carrier gas was set at a flow-rate of 0.6 ml min−1 and maintained under constant pressure. The injector, source and mass transfer lines were set at temperatures of 250° C., 230° C. and 280° C. respectively.


The mass detector was used in the positive electron impact ionisation mode (El+) using an ionisation voltage of 70 eV. A scan range of 35 to 450 mass units was used for acquiring the mass spectra data with a sampling time of 2 which corresponds to 3.5 scans per second. Data acquisition was performed using the MSD Chemstation™ computer software. The injection port was configured for on-column Injections, hence, low sample volumes (0.2 μL) were used for all test samples and injected in the splitless mode. An ethanol solvent wash was included between sample injections and a solvent delay of three minutes applied to the mass detector.


The identification of the individual peaks were made by:


i) Comparing sample mass spectra to those stored in the NIST library database and


ii) Comparing sample mass spectra to published literature values.


The NIST libraries contain over 54,000 spectra. A reverse fit method was used for identification throughout. This method normalises data to 1000, hence compounds with library fits greater than 900 have a very high likelihood of being correctly assigned.









TABLE 8







Sandalwood oil (Swiss Herbal Remedies brand)












Peak
RT

Library Fit

% Peak


No.
(Mins)
Compound
(Reverse)
Peak Area
Area















1
30.47
α-Santalene
961
217084066
0.60



31.07
α-Bergamotene
968
71342373
0.19


2
31.71
epi-β-Santalene
954
122464940
0.33



32.24
β-Santalene
953
214940582
0.59



33.20
Curcumene
980
216370397
0.59


3
36.92
Dendrolasin
920
585451408
1.62


4
41.51
α-Santalol
948
7152370863
19.79


5
41.96
α-trans-Bergamotol
935
3809882649
10.54


6
42.4
epi-β-Santalol
939
62990558
1.91


7
43.12
trans-β-Santalol*
902
7289614401
20.17


8
43.49
Nuciferol
933
4408086672
12.19


9
44.48
Nuciferol isomer
833
1658581138
4.58


10
44.71
cis-Lanceol
927
1083461495
2.99


11
50.68
Unknown

991883190
2.74





Total Area
36138975840





Compounds

74.47





Identified (%)





Total alcohol

41.87





content (%)





Total alcohol content expressed as santalol is 41.87%













TABLE 9







Sandalwood Oil (SAFC brand)












Peak
RT

Library Fit

% Peak


|No.
(Mins)
Compound
(Reverse)
Peak Area
Area















1
30.46
α-Santalene
964
176,600,110
0.66



31.06
α-Bergamotene
966
27,925,579
0.10


2
31.70
epi-β-Santalene
945
214,178,420
0.80


3
32.24
β-Santalene
963
323,842,042
1.21



33.20
Curcumene
969
40,191,154
0.15


4
41.68
α-Santalol
947
13,388,942,510
50.12


5
41.99
α-trans-Bergamotol
952
1,726,157,246
6.46


6
42.53
epi-β-Santalol
950
1,385,388,247
5.186


7
43.21
trans-β-Santalol
953
7,344,111,142
27.49



43.31
Nuciferol
941
trace



8
43.83
Santalol isomer
967
527,459,686
1.97


9
44.02
Unknown

373576932
1.39


10
44.58
cis-Lanceol
966
452,046,537
1.69





Total Area
26,712,032,225





Compounds

95.83





Identified (%)





Total alcohol

84.77





content (%)





Total alcohol content expressed as santalol is 84.77%













TABLE 10







Sandalwood Oil (Fluka brand)












Peak
RT

Library Fit

% Peak


No.
(Mins)
Compound
(Reverse)
Peak Area
Area















1
30.46
α-Santalene
967
158,399,943
1.07



31.07
α-Bergamotene
968
27,597,223
0.18


2
31.70
epi-beta-Santalene
950
170,472,890
1.15


3
32.24
β-Santalene
959
258,738,060
1.75


4
33.11
Unknown

171,605,164
1.16



33.22
Curcumene
894
Trace



5
41.53
α-Santalol
942
7,926,340,551
53.83


6
41.87
α-trans-Bergamotol
949
804,435,867
5.46


7
42.41
epi-β-Santalol
953
679,521,124
4.61


8
43.04
trans-β-Santalol
960
3,189,548,425
21.66


9
43.19
Nuciferol
949
197,251,727
1.34



43.51
Santalol isomer
822
42,100,101
0.28


10
43.72
Santalol isomer
968
168,818,533
1.14


11
44.54
cis-Lanceol
961
129,590,895
0.88


12
*50.91
Diisoctyl phthalate
951






(plasticizer impurity)





Total Area
14,725,166,618





Compounds

93.35





Identified (%)





Total alcohol

81.52





content (%)





Total alcohol content expressed as santalol is 81.52%.













TABLE 11







Purity of chemical analogues by gc-ms: Javanol (sample A)











Peak
RT

Peak
%


No.
(Mins)
Compound
Area
Peak Area














1
38.00
Javanol Isomer 2
791441868
40.82


2
38.44
Javanol Isomer 2
1124046450
57.98


3
42.268
Unknown
22946317
1.18




Total Area
1938434635





Total % Purity = 98.62%













TABLE 12







Purity of chemical analogues by gc-ms: Javanol (sample B)











Peak
RT

Peak
%


No.
(Mins)
Compound
Area
Peak Area














1
37.95
Javanol Isomer 1
406015504
37.63


2
38.41
Javanol Isomer 2
651570188
60.39


3
42.27
Unknown 1
13370100
1.23


4
42.88
Unknown 2
7962910
0.73




Total Area
1078918703





Total % Purity = 98.02%













TABLE 13







Determination of Purity of Santaliff BHT by gc-ms (sample C)












Peak
RT

Library Fit

% Peak


No.
(Mins)
Compound
(Reverse)
Peak Area
Area















1
32.01
Unknown

16811049
0.72%


2
32.37
Santaliff isomer

31247462
1.35%


3
33.22
Santaliff

2238211688
96.80%


4
34.08
Butylated hydroxy
894
25731644
1.11%




toluene*






Total Area

2312001843





Total % Purity = 98.15%






Summary of Results


The santalol isomers were found to be the major chemicals present in the sandalwood oil obtained from India and Indonesia, showing a total santalol content between 78.1-84.7%.


The sandalwood oil procured from the Asia-Pacific/Australia region contained much lower amounts of santalol (mean 41.9%) with substantially high levels of α-trans-Bergamotol (mean 10.4%) and nuciferol (mean 12.6%) compared to sandalwood oil samples obtained from India and Indonesia. Oil from these latter two countries contained a-trans-Bergamotol and nuciferol at lower levels (5.4-7.6%) and (1.3-1.6%) respectively.


The proportion of the two major santalol isomers (α and β), in the various sandalwood oils, varied greatly and favoured the α-isomer in sandalwood oil samples from India and Indonesia (approximately 2:1), whilst slightly favouring the β-isomer for the oils obtained from the Asia-Pacific /Australia region (mean 0.95: 1).


The sandalwood oil procured from the Asia-Pacific/Australia region (Swiss Herbal Remedies) was the only oil found to contain the furano-sesquiterpene dendrolasin.


The chemical analogues santaliff and javanol showed a mean purity of 98.15% and 98.32%, respectively, when analysed by gc-ms.


Analysis of the farnesol standards (old and new) showed the presence of the cis,trans farnesol isomer to substantially increase with time. Both farnesol standards showed greater than 96% purity for the sum of isomers.


Discussion of Results


All the sandalwood oils, tested, contained the same general bouquet of chemicals known as sesquiterpenes. These comprised of α-santalol, β-santalol, bergamotol, epi-santalol, nuciferol and lanceol. Their abundance in sandalwood oil was found to vary and depended upon the geographical location from which the oils were sourced.


GC-MS was able to classify the sandalwood oils into two chemical groups, according to their santalol content. Those oils containing high total santalol levels (Fluka and SAFC) and can be assured to be authentic sandalwood oil from the species S. album


The low santalol level and high nuciferol content detected for the oil from Swiss Herbal Remedies, however, suggests its origin to be either from S. spicatum, a species of sandalwood indigenous to Western Australia or S. austrocaledonicum from the Pacific Islands. S. spicatum has been reported to contain high a farnesol content (Jirovetz et al., 2006), which was not confirmed in these oils. It is possible, however, that the farnesol peak (retention time 42-43 minutes) was co-eluting with the β-santalol peak (42.8-43 minutes). Repeat analysis on a more polar chromatography column would probably separate these compounds and confirm its presence. The detection of dendrolasin in the two samples of sandalwood oil labelled Swiss Herbal Remedies (Asia Pacific/Australia region) confirmed their origin to be from the sandalwood species S. spicatum indigenous to Australia.




embedded image


EXAMPLE 7
Effect of Further Sandalwood Analogues

Further testing of sandalwood analogues was conducted following the protocols described in Examples 3 and 5.


The sandalwood analogues (chemical structures are shown in FIGS. 7 and 8) tested were:


Sanjinol


Bacdanol


Santaliff


Sandela


Javanol


Ebanol


Sandalore


Javanol (batch no. 9000699712), Sandalore (batch no. 9000703989), Ebanol (batch no. 900068333) and Sandela (batch no. 9000701064) were obtained from either Givaudan (UK) (via S. Black Limited, Hertford, UK) and Santaliff, Bacdanol and Sanjinol were obtained from International Flavour and Fragrances (Haverhill, UK)


Results
















TABLE 14









μg/ml
Acetate
Propionate
Butyrate
TVFA
Methane








Compound
μmol/g of feed added
















Sanjinol
5
1978
426
448
2852
1107


Sanjinol
50
2192
579
466
3237
835


Sanjinol
100
2359
697
512
3568
795


Sanjinol
500
1849
744
225
2818
741


Bacdanol
5
2037
444
438
2919
934


Bacdanol
50
2049
434
458
2942
1047


Bacdanol
100
2419
515
514
3448
995


Bacdanol
500
2331
864
309
3503
942


Santaliff
5
2174
466
458
3098
1031


Santaliff
50
2142
442
490
3074
1052


Santaliff
100
2301
543
462
3305
844


Santaliff
500
2101
741
296
3138
801


Sandela batch no. 9000701064
5
2223
465
482
3169
996


Sandela batch no. 9000701064
50
2235
450
513
3198
1052


Sandela batch no. 9000701064
100
2297
477
515
3289
1078


Sandela batch no. 9000701064
500
2270
680
317
3267
928


Javanol batch no. 9000699712
5
2401
493
538
3432
978


Javanol batch no. 9000699712
50
2622
524
593
3739
904


Javanol batch no. 9000699712
100
2504
542
499
3545
859


Javanol batch no. 9000699712
500
2045
833
229
3107
744


Ebanol batch no. 9000683337
5
2136
427
488
3051
952


Ebanol batch no. 9000683337
50
2129
436
474
3039
934


Ebanol batch no. 9000683337
100
2430
533
458
3421
833


Ebanol batch no. 9000683337
500
2333
939
332
3604
683


Sandalore batch no. 9000703989
5
2118
431
487
3036
951


Sandalore batch no. 9000703989
50
1972
409
453
2834
1086


Sandalore batch no. 9000703989
100
2119
471
432
3023
1174


Sandalore batch no. 9000703989
500
2249
897
305
3451
902


Control

1940
526
477
2943
1054


SED

198.7
49.33**
40.93
270.1
83.9***





















TABLE 15





BOTTLE


compound rate
CH4



NO.
rep
Compound no.
ug/30 ml
umol/g




















1
a
200 ul ETOH
0
1153.037



2
b
200 ul ETOH
0
1341.099


3
c
200 ul ETOH
0
1034.304
1176.147


4
a
200 ul DMSO
0
968.2334


5
b
200 ul DMSO
0
951.8643


6
c
200 ul DMSO
0
927.0059
949.0346


7
a
Javanol batch no. 9000699712
150
956.9591




in 200 ul DMSO


8
b
Javanol batch no. 9000699712
150
888.4071




in 200 ul DMSO


9
c
Javanol batch no. 9000699712
150
895.6242
913.6635




in 200 ul DMSO


10
a
Javanol batch no. 9000699712
15000
647.283




in 200 ul DMSO


11
b
Javanol batch no. 9000699712
15000
563.0216




in 200 ul DMSO


12
c
Javanol batch no. 9000699712
15000
605.5467
605.2838




in 200 ul DMSO


13
a
Javanol batch no. 9000699712
150
1403.051




in 200 ul ETOH


14
b
Javanol batch no. 9000699712
150
1381.609




in 200 ul ETOH


15
c
Javanol batch no. 9000699712
150
1335.905
1373.522




in 200 ul ETOH


16
a
Javanol batch no. 9000699712
15000
1145.346




in 200 ul ETOH


17
b
Javanol batch no. 9000699712
15000
1230.103




in 200 ul ETOH


18
c
Javanol batch no. 9000699712
15000
1099.314
1158.255




in 200 ul ETOH


19
a
Sanjinol in 200 ul DMSO
150
1107.671


20
b
Sanjinol in 200 ul DMSO
150
793.8945


21
c
Sanjinol in 200 ul DMSO
150
914.1195
938.5618


22
a
Sanjinol in 200 ul DMSO
15000
615.569


23
b
Sanjinol in 200 ul DMSO
15000
893.1559


24
c
Sanjinol in 200 ul DMSO
15000
722.2742
743.6664


25
a
Sanjinolin 200 ul ETOH
150
1064.879


26
b
Sanjinolin 200 ul ETOH
150
1232.288


27
c
Sanjinolin 200 ul ETOH
150
1162.641
1153.269


28
a
Sanjinolin 200 ul ETOH
15000
1063.899


29
b
Sanjinolin 200 ul ETOH
15000
1351.649


30
c
Sanjinolin 200 ul ETOH
15000
1059.708
1158.419









The sandalwood analogues tested (tables 14 and 15) showed a generalised improvement in a variety of properties when administered to the rusitec model. In particular, reductions in methane were achieved and these were shown to be dose specific reductions, such that increased doses of the sandalwood analogue are generally associated with a decrease in methane and volatile fatty acid production.

Claims
  • 1. The use of a sandalwood extract or a sandalwood analogue as an additive to animal foodstuff.
  • 2. The use of claim 1 wherein the extract or analogue is added to the foodstuff after the foodstuff has been prepared.
  • 3. The use of claim 1 wherein the extract or analogue is added to the foodstuff during preparation of the foodstuff.
  • 4. The use of claim 1 wherein the amount of sandalwood extract or analogue used is 0.025 and 50 g per day.
  • 5. The use of claim 4 wherein the amount is between 0.5 and 50 g per day for large ruminants and horses and 0.025 g-2.5 g per day in smaller ruminants.
  • 6. The use of claim 5 wherein the amount is 5 g per day for large ruminants and horses.
  • 7. The use of claim 5 wherein the amount is 2.5 g per day for small ruminants
  • 8. The use of claim 1 wherein the amount of sandalwood extract or analogue used is between 25 mg/kg-50 g/kg.
  • 9. The use of claim 8 wherein the amount is 500 mg/kg.
  • 10. An animal foodstuff comprising a sandalwood extract or a sandalwood analogue.
  • 11. The foodstuff of claim 10 comprising between 0.025 and 50 g per day of sandalwood extract or analogue.
  • 12. The foodstuff of claim 11 wherein the amount is between 0.5 and 50 g per day for large ruminants and horses and 0.025 g-2.5 g per day in smaller ruminants.
  • 13. The foodstuff of claim 12 wherein the amount is 5 g per day for large ruminants and horses.
  • 14. The foodstuff of claim 12 wherein the amount is 2.5 g per day for small ruminants
  • 15. The foodstuff of of claim 10 wherein the amount of sandalwood extract used is between 25 mg/kg-50 g/kg.
  • 16. The foodstuff of claim 10 wherein the amount is 500 mg/kg.
  • 17. The foodstuff of claim 10 packaged and presented for feeding a ruminant or a horse.
  • 18. A method for reducing the growth of pathogenic bacteria in the digestive system of a ruminant or horse comprising supplying the ruminant or horse with a sandalwood extract or a sandalwood analogue.
  • 19. The method of claim 18 wherein pathogenic bacterial growth is reduced in the rumen.
  • 20. The method of claim 18 wherein the bacteria is E. coli and/or Listeria monocytogenes.
  • 21. The method of claim 18 wherein the ruminant or horse is supplied with an animal foodstuff comprising a sandalwood extract or a sandalwood analogue.
  • 22. A method of increasing meat and/or milk production from a ruminant or horse comprising supplying the ruminant or horse with a sandalwood extract or a sandalwood analogue.)
  • 23. The method of claim 22 wherein the ruminant or horse is supplied with an animal foodstuff comprising a sandalwood extract or a sandalwood analogue.
  • 24. A method for reducing protein breakdown in the digestive system of a ruminant or horse comprising supplying the ruminant or horse with sandalwood extract.
  • 25. The method of claim 24 wherein protein breakdown is reduced in the rumen.
  • 26. The method of claim 24 wherein the ruminant or horse is supplied with an animal foodstuff comprising a sandalwood extract or a sandalwood analogue.
  • 27. A method of reducing methane emission by a ruminant or horse comprising supplying the ruminant or horse with sandalwood extract.
  • 28. The method of claim 27 wherein the ruminant or horse is supplied with an animal foodstuff comprising a sandalwood extract or a sandalwood analogue.
  • 29-32. (canceled)
  • 33. The use of claim 1 in which the sandalwood analogue has the structure:
  • 34. The use of claim 1 in which the sandalwood analogue has the structure:
  • 35. The use of claim 1 in which the sandalwood analogue has the structure:
  • 36-38. (canceled)
  • 39. The foodstuff of claim 10 in which the sandalwood analogue has the structure:
  • 40. The method of claim 18 in which the sandalwood analogue has the structure:
  • 41. The foodstuff of claim 10 in which the sandalwood analogue has the structure:
  • 42. The method of claim 18 in which the sandalwood analogue has the structure:
  • 43. The foodstuff of claim 10 in which the sandalwood analogue has the structure:
  • 44. The method of claim 18 in which the sandalwood analogue has the structure:
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
0811362.3 Jun 2008 GB national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/GB09/01547 6/19/2009 WO 00 3/4/2011