Biological testing with sawtooth-shaped prisms

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8355133
  • Patent Number
    8,355,133
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 30, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 15, 2013
    12 years ago
Abstract
In one embodiment, an apparatus is provided for testing for the presence of analytes in a sample. The apparatus comprises a source of light directed at the bottom surface of a substrate to achieve total internal reflection and to generate an evanescent field. An array of capture elements is immobilized on the top surface of the substrate. The bottom surface of the substrate is configured as a sawtooth (in cross section), the “teeth” aligned with the rows or the columns in the array. The outer faces of the sawtooth “prisms” are non-parallel to the substrate top surface, and specific requirements are imposed on the prism light-entrance face, and the substrate thickness and refractive index.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related to pending U.S. application Ser. No. 12/125,735, filed May 22, 2008, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein for all purposes.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to determining the presence of analytes in a sample and more specifically to apparatus and methods which employ an array of capture elements immobilized on a substrate which respond when exposed to a sample to provide patterns of binding events.


BACKGROUND

U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,011 issued Jul. 15, 2003 describes an apparatus which employs a substrate with an array of capture elements immobilized on the top surface of the substrate. When the array is exposed to a fluid sample, patterns of binding events occur in the array depending on the analytes present in the sample. The patterns of binding events are captured by directing a beam of polarized light through a prism abutting the bottom surface of the substrate. The beam is directed at an angle to obtain total internal reflection (TIR) and to generate an evanescent field in the plane of the array. The pattern of binding events is imposed on a detection device such as a CCD camera and compared with a stored image of the array captured prior to exposure to the sample. The localized changes in the intensities of reflected light and the locations of those changes in the array are representative of the various analytes present in the sample.


SUMMARY

In accordance with the principles of this invention, the bottom surface of a substrate which either has or is intended to have an array of capture elements immobilized on its top surface, is configured to have a plurality of prisms which have a sawtooth cross-sectional shape. The prisms conveniently align as wedges parallel to either rows or columns of wells in the plate, and are comprised of outer planes (e.g., entrance and exit faces) that are non-parallel to the top surface of the substrate. Further, the incident prism face (aperture) for the light has to be sufficiently large and the substrate to which the prisms are coupled has to be sufficiently thick to limit divergence of the incident beam and to ensure the light enters and exits the prism film in a way which minimizes effects on beam polarization, respectively.


The size of the sawtooth prism pattern is important because the design allows for the possibility of imaging a surface up to a millimeter past the sawtooth structure which requires minimizing diffraction effects. The structural design of the present disclosure is thus distinguished from a diffraction grating which splits and diffracts light into several beams traveling in different directions based on the wavelength. For a diffraction grating, the grating spacing (pitch), and angles of the incident and diffracted beams follow what is known as the grating equation and diffraction is required to achieve the desired effect. Although diffraction can never be eliminated, the effects may be reduced to acceptable levels by adhering to the geometric constraints discussed below.


The sawtooth prism pattern disclosed herein can be formed in a film which can be attached to the substrate bottom surface in the absence of an index matching fluid, or the bottom surface may have an integral sawtooth bottom configuration in another embodiment. The “substrate” herein should be transparent to the light used for detection and have sufficiently low surface roughness at the top surface where total internal reflection (TIR) occurs. This substrate can be comprised of a transparent material, such as glass or plastic, and can be integral to or a part of the entire disposable. Typically, the substrate will either have the dimensions of a microscope slide or have a length and width close to the glass and plastic substrates used in glass bottom multiwell plates. In accordance with ANSI/SBS standards for multiwell plates, typical configurations for the disposables are slides with wells (9 mm center-to-center spacing for 96 well plates and 4.5 mm spacing for 384-well plates), and glass bottom 96-well and 384-well plates. It is also possible that the substrate can be a part of a microfluidic disposable device with precisely patterned channels on the top surface of the substrate and a prism film attached to the bottom surface.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1 and 2 are schematic side views of substrates with a sawtooth-shaped bottom surface in accordance with the principles of this disclosure;



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an optical system useful with a substrate configured as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2;



FIG. 4 is a projection view of a top member for forming a substrate of FIGS. 1 and 2 into a multiwell disposable;



FIGS. 5 and 6 are projection views of alternative apparatus employing capillary action and a flow cell, respectively, to move a sample from an input position across an array of capture elements; and



FIG. 7 is a graph illustrating field of view versus substrate thickness.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Prior to describing embodiments of the present disclosure in greater detail, the following definition is provided for use throughout the present document.


Sawtooth: A jagged or zigzag repeating pattern, outline, or course. In one embodiment, the cross-section of each prism is, illustratively, a right triangle sawtooth.


The present disclosure relates to apparatus and methods for determining the occurrence of binding events between different ligands in an array of ligands immobilized on the top surface of a transparent substrate and analytes in a sample to which the array is exposed. In one embodiment of the present disclosure, the bottom surface of the substrate has a sawtooth cross-sectional geometry with each prism (e.g., a right triangle prism) parallel with the rows or with the columns of the array of ligands. Each prism may extend across the entire substrate (a few inches for a 96-well plate for example) or be any length less than the substrate dimension. For example, each prism may extend only across a single well (underneath a 96-well plate) so that each prism is 7.5 mm long, allowing for flat regions between wells that can be used for light intensity calibration. The “sawtooth” geometry is useful for any related technology which directs light into the bottom surface of a substrate which has, or is intended to have on the top surface thereof an array of capture elements (ligands) to test for the presence of analytes in a sample.


Although the cross section geometry of a sawtooth is easily visualized as is the alignment of “tooth” wedges with a row (or column) of an array, there are some constraints on the geometry. Specifically, it has been realized that once the area of an array is determined (by choice), the thickness of the substrate, the index of refraction of the substrate and the entrance and exit faces of the wedges are constrained. If the apparatus further includes multiple test sites, the spacing between cells also becomes a constraint.


The sawtooth is formed with outer faces that are non-parallel to the plane of the top surface of the substrate but which form right angles between adjacent faces in one embodiment. In other embodiments, the sawtooth may be formed entirely with outer faces that are non-parallel to the plane of the substrate top surface and which do not form right angles between adjacent faces. The second embodiment is useful for disposable designs where the incoming light would not be incident perpendicular to the first surface of each prism.


It is noted that the disclosure herein is described illustratively with respect to the apparatus described in the above-mentioned U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,011 but may be used with various apparatus using light from beneath a substrate to image patterns of binding events, for example via spatially-distributed polarization changes or other techniques.


The following disclosure presents equations and graphs relating the ranges of parameter choices once a field of view (FOV) is decided. In an experimental apparatus the sawtooth microprism film structure was defined in a two-component film separate from the substrate. The film consisted of a plastic material (COC) bound to a UV cured polymer formed into the shape of microprisms and an adhesive was used to adhere the film to the bottom surface of the substrate. No fluid interface was necessary and the sawtooth microprisms were laminated directly on the substrate bottom surface. In the production of high volume prism film disposable structures, care must be taken to avoid introducing stress birefringence in the prism films themselves. For example, in a lamination process, this is achieved by controlling the pressure between the roller and the substrates and the tension in the unwinding film. The most important specification is not the total birefringence but the birefringence variability in the prism film. A constant but uniform birefringence in the film can be compensated for with an appropriate optical coating on the top surface of the substrate whereas too much birefringence variability will impact the repeatability of an optical measurement made through the underside of such a disposable.


A prism film structure, in one embodiment, may be comprised of four different materials which create the stack structure: the prisms (UV polymer), the plastic substrate (COC), the adhesive, and the glass. In order to have a complete equation for the maximum field of view, we need two (2) parameters for every material in the stack. An approximation is to treat the prism film structure as being made of a single material so that the field of view can be written in terms of the overall thickness and average refractive index only. This approximation is valid as long as effort is made to index match all four materials as closely as possible. If we define the field of view as measured along the direction of light propagation only and let T stand for thickness of the substrate and n stand for the index of refraction of the substrate, the following constraints exist for the maximum field of view (FOV):










FOV


2

T






tan


[


sin

-
1




(

1.344
n

)


]









and






FOV


9
-

2

T






tan


[


sin

-
1




(

1.344
n

)


]









(

Equation





1

)







The first constraint ensures that reflected light does not exit prisms of the wrong orientation and the second constraint ensures that the entry and exit portions of the prism field do not extend beyond the well-well spacing of 9 mm. Accordingly, an allowable combination of FOV and substrate thickness must fit within the triangular region in the graph shown in FIG. 7. The value, 1.344=n sin(θ), is determined by optically modeling the optimum angle of incidence inside the substrate. This number is dependent on the refractive index of the sample being measured.


One way to read the graph of FIG. 7 is to specify a desired FOV for the measurement and determine the range of substrate thicknesses allowable for that field of view. For example, for a 4.5 mm FOV, there is only one possible substrate thickness, 1.26 mm. However, a 4.0 mm FOV is achieved for any substrate thickness between 1.12 mm and 1.4 mm.


Referring now to FIG. 1, a schematic cross-section of apparatus 10 is illustrated in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. The apparatus 10 comprises a glass substrate 12 having a thickness T and parallel top and bottom surfaces 14 and 15, respectively. A prism film 17 is attached to bottom surface 15 of the substrate 12. In one example, the prism film 17 comprises a planar layer 18 formed of Cyclic Olefin Copolymer (COC) and a sawtooth layer 19 formed of UV-cured acrylic ester. It is noted that other materials can be used for the prism film (for either the planar layer or the sawtooth layer).


The sawtooth prisms can be seen in layer 19 to comprise outer faces (or facets) which are non-parallel to the substrate top (or bottom) surface. In one embodiment, the sawtooth prisms in layer 19 consist of only outer faces (or facets), which are non-parallel to the substrate top/bottom surfaces 14, 15. A prism facet 20a has a dimension X and the sawtooth layer 19 has a thickness H and a period P as indicated in FIG. 1. The prism facets 20a are formed at an angle θ with respect to top/bottom surfaces 14, 15. If the incoming light beam is incident normal to prism facets 20a, 0 will also be the angle of incidence and the light will exit normal to prism facets 20a on the other side of broken line 23 which is transversely centered about each well (not shown in FIG. 1). Prism facets 20b are not meant to be surfaces for light entry and exit. For example, if the substrate thickness is too thin, light will exit those faces and refract so strongly that the light will re-enter the neighboring 20a faces without exiting the prism film structure when θ=58.3°, which is the case in FIG. 1. Light transmission through the entire disposable is maximized when the faces 20a and 20b make a right angle for a perfectly collimated system.


A ligand (protein) array 25 is provided at the top surface 14 of substrate 12. In some embodiments, the ligand array may extend across the entire surface of the substrate. In other embodiment, the same array is repeated at the bottom of every well of a glass-bottom, 96-well plate where the spatial extent of the ligand array may cover 7.5 mm×4.5 mm at the center of each well. For any complete structure with a fixed well-to-well spacing, the alternating sawtooth pattern period must scale directly with that well spacing.



FIG. 2 is an enlarged schematic sideview of prisms which are part of a single material structure (i.e., an integral injection molded part) where, in one example, X=0.05 mm and P=0.095 mm. As noted hereinbefore, the prism geometry can be formed directly on the bottom surface of the substrate and FIG. 2 illustrates such a simplified apparatus. In the case of 96-well plates, in order to get light in and out of every well with the light perpendicular to the entry and exit faces of the sawtooth structure, the thickness of the entire bottom structure should be close to 1.2 mm in order to maximize the field of view of the ligand arrays. This thickness constraint is directly proportional to the well-to-well spacing so that the same geometry with 384-well plates would require a thickness of 0.6 mm in order to maximize the field of view. The constraint also assumes that light is allowed to enter and exit each well of the plate individually and that the field of view is always centered within the well.


The sawtooth-shaped prism configuration for the substrate bottom surface has the attractive characteristic of virtually eliminating multiple reflections of an incident light beam. The reason for this is that the sawtooth does not have faces (or facets) parallel to the plane of the micro array of ligands (i.e., the substrate top surface).


Diffraction is also an important constraint on the sawtooth geometry. The light entering each of the (sawtooth) prisms will diverge due to diffraction. It is preferable that the light diverges no more than about 0.5 degrees before striking the (protein) array. To limit the divergence, the shorter dimension (X) of the entry face of any prism is determined by:










X


λ

sin





φ



,




(

Equation





2

)








where φ is the divergence half angle of the beam.


If φ≦0.5°, then X≧50 microns at a wavelength of about 450 nm. As a result, the pitch,







P
=

X

cos





θ



,





where θ is the angle of incidence of the incoming light with respect to the plane of the microarray, would have to be greater than 95 microns in this example. For a test apparatus with prism material having an index of refraction n of 1.58, the ideal angle of incidence (AOI) is 58.3 degrees as shown in FIG. 1. The sawtooth prism film structure can be made with smaller prism pitches because there are no flat planar faces between neighboring prisms. From a diffraction perspective it is preferable to have the prisms as large as possible with a pitch greater than 95 microns for a 58.3 degrees AOI.



FIG. 3 shows an illustrative optical system for use with a substrate with a sawtooth bottom surface in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. Components of the optical system, such as an optical light subsystem and an optical sensing subsystem, are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,011 issued Jul. 15, 2003, which has been previously incorporated by reference for all purposes. Suffice it to say that light from optical subsystem 312 is totally internally reflected from the bottom surface of substrate 319. Optical sensing subsystem 314 including a CCD camera 320 is operative to capture the reflected image of any binding events between ligands in a microarray on the top surface 323 of substrate 319 and analytes in a sample introduced, for example, by pipette 324 into one of the illustrative three wells shown.


In one experimental apparatus, a “disposable” device as shown in FIG. 1, was comprised of sawtooth prisms made of UV-cured acrylic ester on a COC plastic planar layer backing about 80 microns thick. The sawtooth prisms and planar backing were coupled to a substrate comprised of a Schott D-263 microscope slide with optical silicon dioxide coatings 2 nm, 4 nm and 6 nm thick. Neighboring faces of the sawtooth were 90 degrees to one another with each tooth having a right triangle cross section in one example. The distance between the peaks and valleys of the sawtooth structure perpendicular to the substrate plane was determined by H=P sin(θ)cos(θ) where θ was the angle between the faces of dimension X and the plane of the substrate surface.


In one embodiment, on the top surface of the glass substrate, spatially distinct areas with different optical coatings were used, each of which corresponded to a different sensitivity to molecular attachment and thus, a different detectable analyte concentration range. Ligand arrays were formed partially on the different coated areas to take advantage of the different sensitivities to molecular attachment which expands the dynamic range of protein detection to five or more orders of magnitude.


Several prism films were made and tested; and the films had the following dimensions: Length: 25-30 mm; Width: 17-21 mm; Polymer thickness=0.17 mm; Substrate thickness=0.08 mm; Prism Pitches ranged from 40-120 microns; X had a range from 21-63 microns; and T glass=1 mm.


Test results were as follows.


In order to determine how the prism films affect the polarization of the light beam, height determinations were made of the slide standards with known height standards of silicon dioxide coatings on the surface. These measurements were compared to the case where a glass prism is used which is known to have very little birefringence and thus, has negligible effect on the light polarization that propagates through the system. The results show that the signal sensitivity of the prism films were 93%±5% of the glass prism case with a spot to spot variation of 3.3%±0.3%, comparable to the spot to spot variation seen in the glass prism case.


A substrate with a bottom surface configured as a sawtooth shaped prism in accordance with the present disclosure can be used to advantage in any system for determining the presence of an analyte in a sample so long as light is incident to the bottom surface of a substrate in a manner to obtain total internal reflection and an evanescent field in the plane of the top surface of the substrate. The substrate may comprise a single glass slide like a microscope slide 400 juxtaposed with a top member with a plurality of through holes to form an assembly as shown by member 400 in FIG. 4.



FIGS. 5 and 6 show perspective views of alternative apparatus employing capillary action in the case of FIG. 5 and fluid pumps in the case of FIG. 6, to move a sample from an input position across an array of ligands. Specifically, FIG. 5 shows a substrate, typically a microscope slide 500 with first and second test positions for testing one of many possible liquids, such as blood serum samples. The samples are deposited at the half-circular openings 502 and 504 and move, by capillary action, to the associated triangular areas 506 and 508, respectively. An array of ligands is formed in each triangular area 506, 508, protected by a thin plastic film, and binding events between proteins in the array and analytes in a sample are imaged as described hereinbefore. The underside of slide 500 (not shown) is advantageously configured as a sawtooth prism in the areas beneath the triangular areas, allowing the light to be coupled into and out of the substrate in a manner to achieve total internal reflection about the top surface of the substrate while preserving the polarization state of the light beam upon entry and exit from the apparatus.



FIG. 6 shows a flow cell apparatus similar to that shown in FIG. 5. The apparatus comprises a substrate 600 with enclosed fluid channels 604 extending between an input port 605 and output port 606 and between an input port 607 and an output port 608. The apparatus of FIG. 6, one of many possible embodiments of a sample holder, is adapted for the use of a pipette to introduce a sample. The output ports are provided as air and liquid outlets to allow for a possible continuous flow of the sample through the flow cell apparatus. An introduced sample is moved by positive pressure to the associated microarrays 609 and 610 and beyond with the flow rate controlled. The underside of the substrate (not shown) again benefits from a sawtooth prism configuration in accordance with the principles of this invention in the areas under the microarrays. Binding events are imaged as disclosed hereinbefore.


The foregoing detailed description of embodiments of the present disclosure is presented for purposes of illustration and disclosure in accordance with the requirements of the law. It is not intended to be exhaustive nor to limit the invention to the precise form(s) described, but only to enable others skilled in the art to understand how the invention may be suited for a particular use or implementation. The possibility of modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. No limitation is intended by the description of embodiments which may have included tolerances, feature dimensions, specific operating conditions, engineering specifications, or the like, and which may vary between implementations or with changes to the state of the art, and no limitation should be implied therefrom. This disclosure has been made with respect to the current state of the art, but also contemplates advancements and that adaptations in the future may take into consideration those advancements, namely in accordance with the then current state of the art. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims as written and equivalents as applicable. Reference to a claim element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless explicitly so stated. Moreover, no element, component nor method or process step in this disclosure is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether the element, component or step is explicitly recited in the claims. No claim element herein is to be construed under the provisions of 35 USC Sec. 112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for . . . ” and no method or process step herein is to be construed under those provisions unless the step, or steps, are expressly recited using the phrase “step(s) for . . . ”.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for determining the presence of analytes in a sample, the apparatus comprising: a transparent substrate with top and bottom surfaces spaced apart a distance d and formed of a material having an index of refraction n, wherein the substrate bottom surface includes a sawtooth prism having a cross-sectional sawtooth configuration comprising a light input portion and a light output portion which are mirror images of each other about a center line of the sample, and wherein the sawtooth prism has a height H, a pitch P, and an angle θ between an entry face and the plane of the substrate top surface according to the equation H=P sin θ cos θ.
  • 2. The apparatus as in claim 1, wherein the substrate comprises a microscope slide.
  • 3. The apparatus as in claim 1, further comprising an array of capture elements immobilized on the substrate top surface.
  • 4. The apparatus as in claim 3, further comprising a plurality of arrays in spaced apart positions on the top surface of the substrate.
  • 5. The apparatus as in claim 3, further comprising first and second coatings relating to different sensitivities to molecular attachment and wherein the array partially overlaps each of the coatings.
  • 6. The apparatus as in claim 3, further comprising a fluid channel in communication with the array and a sample input port connected to the channel, the channel being dimensioned to move a sample by capillary action across the array.
  • 7. The apparatus as in claim 1, further comprising a well-forming member integral with the substrate top surface, the member having a plurality of holes therein for forming sample wells, each of the wells in registry with an array.
  • 8. The apparatus as in claim 5, further comprising a well forming member integral with the substrate top surface, the member having a plurality of holes therein for forming sample wells, each of the wells in registry with the array.
  • 9. The apparatus as in claim 7, further comprising an optical system for directing light at an input face of at least one tooth of the sawtooth prism in a manner to obtain total internal reflection and an evanescent field in the plane of the top surface.
  • 10. The apparatus as in claim 9, further comprising an imaging system for imaging the pattern of light reflected from the array and for determining patterns of changes from an initial stored light pattern.
  • 11. The apparatus as in claim 1, wherein P >40 microns.
  • 12. The apparatus as in claim 1, wherein the cross-sectional sawtooth configuration further comprises in each tooth two sides of unequal lengths, and wherein X=P cos θ where X is the length of the shorter one of the two sides of the cross-sectional sawtooth configuration.
  • 13. The apparatus as in claim 12, wherein the substrate comprises glass at least 1 mm thick and the sawtooth prism comprises a film of two layers, including a COC planar film and a UV-cured acrylic ester.
  • 14. The apparatus as in claim 5, wherein the first and second coatings are taken from a group consisting of silicon dioxide, magnesium fluoride, tantalum pentoxide, titanium dioxide, and other metal oxides.
  • 15. The apparatus as in claim 1, wherein the sawtooth prism comprises a separate film attached to the substrate bottom surface.
  • 16. An apparatus comprising: a substrate having a top surface for placement of a sample and a bottom surface, wherein the bottom surface has a consecutive tooth-shaped geometry with teeth arranged in rows and columns, with consecutive teeth in a column abutting one another to form a sawtooth configuration comprising a light input portion and a light output portion which are minor images of each other about a center line of the sample and with adjacent teeth in a row being in alignment with one another.
  • 17. The apparatus as in claim 16, further comprising a well-defining member with an array of apertures there through attached to the top surface of the substrate to define an array of wells.
  • 18. The apparatus as in claim 17, wherein adjacent teeth in a row form an elongated wedge.
  • 19. The apparatus as in claim 18, wherein consecutive wedges comprise adjacent faces non-parallel to the plane of the top surface and form a continuous sawtooth configuration.
  • 20. The apparatus as in claim 16, wherein the bottom surface has a sawtooth geometry formed by an attached thin film with an embossed or preformed sawtooth geometry.
  • 21. The apparatus as in claim 16, further comprising a source of light of wavelength λ directed at an entrance face of at least one tooth of a sawtooth geometry wherein the area of the entrance face, X, is at least
  • 22. The apparatus as in claim 21, wherein a divergence of light due to diffraction in the substrate is less than or equal to 0.5°, and the pitch P from tooth to tooth is P ≧100μm sin θ tan θ, where θ is the angle of incidence of the incoming light with respect to the plane of the top surface.
  • 23. The apparatus as in claim 17, further comprising an array of capture elements in each well.
  • 24. The apparatus as in claim 17, further comprising first and second coatings in each well wherein the coatings are selected to correspond to different levels of molecular attachment.
  • 25. The apparatus as in claim 24, wherein the capture elements in each well partially overlap each of the first and second coatings corresponding to different levels of molecular attachment.
US Referenced Citations (92)
Number Name Date Kind
1637141 Cooper Jul 1927 A
3177759 Wilkes, Jr. et al. Apr 1965 A
3279307 Wilkes, Jr. et al. Oct 1966 A
3858616 Thiery et al. Jan 1975 A
4146365 Kay et al. Mar 1979 A
4238565 Hornby et al. Dec 1980 A
4256834 Zuk et al. Mar 1981 A
4508832 Carter et al. Apr 1985 A
5164589 Sjoedin Nov 1992 A
5225164 Astle Jul 1993 A
5229833 Stewart Jul 1993 A
5234769 Shevlin Aug 1993 A
5255075 Cush Oct 1993 A
5313264 Ivarsson et al. May 1994 A
5341215 Seher Aug 1994 A
5437840 King et al. Aug 1995 A
5446534 Goldman Aug 1995 A
5483346 Butzer Jan 1996 A
5485277 Foster Jan 1996 A
5491097 Ribi et al. Feb 1996 A
5491556 Stewart et al. Feb 1996 A
5573956 Hanning Nov 1996 A
5593130 Hansson et al. Jan 1997 A
5633724 King et al. May 1997 A
5641640 Hanning Jun 1997 A
RE35716 Stapleton et al. Jan 1998 E
5738825 Rudigier et al. Apr 1998 A
5753518 Karlsson May 1998 A
5796858 Zhou et al. Aug 1998 A
5813439 Herrero et al. Sep 1998 A
5856873 Naya et al. Jan 1999 A
5922594 Loefas Jul 1999 A
5922604 Stapleton et al. Jul 1999 A
5955729 Nelson et al. Sep 1999 A
5965456 Malmqvist et al. Oct 1999 A
5972612 Malmqvist et al. Oct 1999 A
6008010 Greenberger et al. Dec 1999 A
6008893 Roos et al. Dec 1999 A
6026053 Satorius Feb 2000 A
6045996 Cronin et al. Apr 2000 A
6065501 Feret et al. May 2000 A
6127183 Ivarsson et al. Oct 2000 A
6140044 Bessemer et al. Oct 2000 A
6143513 Loefas Nov 2000 A
6143574 Karlsson et al. Nov 2000 A
6197595 Anderson et al. Mar 2001 B1
6200814 Malmqvist et al. Mar 2001 B1
6207381 Larsson et al. Mar 2001 B1
6253793 Dupoiron et al. Jul 2001 B1
6277330 Liu et al. Aug 2001 B1
6289286 Andersson et al. Sep 2001 B1
6354333 Dupoiron et al. Mar 2002 B1
6355429 Nygren et al. Mar 2002 B1
6415825 Dupoiron et al. Jul 2002 B1
6475809 Wagner et al. Nov 2002 B1
6493097 Ivarsson Dec 2002 B1
6503760 Malmqvist et al. Jan 2003 B2
D472644 Dawson et al. Apr 2003 S
6549011 Flatt Apr 2003 B2
6589798 Loefas Jul 2003 B1
6594011 Kempen Jul 2003 B1
D480149 Dawson et al. Sep 2003 S
6698454 Sjoelander et al. Mar 2004 B2
6710870 Marowsky et al. Mar 2004 B1
6714303 Ivarsson Mar 2004 B2
6806051 Ellson Oct 2004 B2
6810286 Donovan et al. Oct 2004 B2
6833920 Rassman et al. Dec 2004 B2
6859280 Kempen Feb 2005 B2
6882420 Rassman et al. Apr 2005 B2
6981526 Glejbol et al. Jan 2006 B2
7045287 Smith et al. May 2006 B2
7193711 Rassman et al. Mar 2007 B2
7195872 Agrawal et al. Mar 2007 B2
20020019019 Hamalainen et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020154311 Ivarsson Oct 2002 A1
20020182717 Karlsson Dec 2002 A1
20030022388 Roos et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030067612 Ivarsson Apr 2003 A1
20030112432 Yguerabide et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030148401 Agrawal et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030205681 Modlin Nov 2003 A1
20030232384 Kocher et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040002167 Andersson et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040012676 Weiner et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040023247 Xu et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040030504 Helt et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040038268 Pirrung et al. Feb 2004 A1
20050017191 Montagu et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050148063 Cracauer et al. Jul 2005 A1
20060263874 Kunuki et al. Nov 2006 A1
20090237670 Osborne et al. Sep 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
742417 Feb 2000 AU
0257955 Mar 1988 EP
2116839 Nov 2009 EP
11304693 Nov 1999 JP
WO 8911057 Nov 1989 WO
WO 9100467 Jan 1991 WO
WO 9522754 Aug 1995 WO
WO 9608720 Mar 1996 WO
WO 9638729 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9719375 May 1997 WO
WO 9832002 Jul 1998 WO
WO 03056337 Jul 2003 WO
WO 03102580 Dec 2003 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (47)
Entry
International Search Report, issued Mar. 4, 2011, by the European Patent Office in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2010/059854.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, issued Mar. 4, 2011, 2008, by the European Patent Office in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2010/059854.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/677,674, Dultz et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/748,023, Dultz et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,369, Dultz.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,056, Dultz.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/125,685, Dultz.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/125,735, Dultz et al.
Tadashi Saitoh, et al.“Optical Characterization of Very Thin Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon Films Using Spectroscopic Ellipsometry”; Japanese Journal of Applied Physics; vol. 30, No. 11B, Nov. 1991. pp. L1914-L1916.
“Handbook of Optics”, Michael Bass Editor in Chief, by The Optical Society of America; vol. 1; pp. 4.23, 4.24; 1995 McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Bass, et al. “Handbook of Optics”, by The Optical Society of America; vol. 1; Section 41.10; 1995 McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Gang Jin et al. “Imaging Ellipsometry Revisited: Developments for Visualization of Thin Transparent Layers on Silicon Substrates”, American Institute of Physics, Rev. Sci. Instrum., pp. 2930-2936, Aug. 1996.
Max Born et al. “Principles of Optics—Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light”, Sixth Edition, pp. 47-51 Pergamon Press.
Eggins, “Biosensors: An Introduction”, pp. 112-113, 1987 John Wiley & Sons.
Danny Van Noort et al. “Monitoring Specific Interaction of Low Molecular Weight Biomolecules on Oxidized Porous Silicon Using Ellipsometry”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics vol. 13, No. 3-4 pp. 439-449, 1998 Elsevier Science, S.A. Great Britain.
Gang Jin et al. “Imaging Ellipsometry for Biosensor Applications” Transducers '95. Eurosensors IX, Digest of Technical Papers vol. 2, Sessions A7-D13, Papers No. 232-496 pp. 509-512, Stockholm, Sweden, Jun. 1995.
Jinyu Wang “Waveguide Ellipsometry Biosensors: Concept and Preliminary Analysis”, SPIE vol. 1648, Fiber Optical Medical and Fluorescent Sensors and Applications pp. 44-50, 1992.
Ulf Jonsson et al. “Flow-Injection Ellipsometry—An in Situ Method for the Study of Biomolecular Adsorption and Interaction at Solid Surfaces,” Colloids and Surfaces, 13 (1985) pp. 333-339, 1985 Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jonsson, Ulf et al. “Biosensors Based on Surface Concentration Measuring Devices—The Concept of Surface Concentration” Progress in Colloid and Polymer Sci. vol. 70, pp. 96-100, 1985.
Schena, Mark “DNA Microarrays: A Practical Approach” Edited by Mark Schena, Department of Biochemistry, Beckman Center, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, USA, Oxford University Press, 1999.
Schema, PhD. Mark, “Microarray Biochip Technology” TeleChem International, Inc., Sunnyvale, California, USA, A BioTechniques Books Publication, Eaton Publishing, pp. 10-11, 2000.
Harland G. Tompkins, et al. “Spectroscopic Ellipsometry and Reflectometry a User's Guide” A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1999.
Ulf Jonsson et al. “Surface Immobilization Techniques in Combination with Ellipsometry” Methods in Enzymology vol. 137, Immobilized Enzymes and Cells Part D pp. 381-1351, 1988 Academic Press, Inc. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers.
Ch Striebel et al. “Characterization of Biomembranes by Spectral Ellipsometry, Surface Plasmon Resonance and Interferometry with Regard to Biosensor Application”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics 9, pp. 139-146, 1994 Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd.
T.A. Ruzgas et al. “Ellipsometric Immunosensors for the Determination of γ-Interferon and Human Serum Albumin”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics 7, pp. 305-308, 1992 Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd.
Haken Nygren et al. “Determination by Ellipsometry of the Affinity of Monoclonal Antibodies”, Journal of Immunological Methods, 92, pp. 219-225, 1986 Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd.
John F. Place et al. “Opto-electronic Immunosensors: A Review of Optical Immunoassay at Continuous Surfaces”, Biosensors 1, pp. 321-353, 1985 Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Ltd., England.
A. Brecht et al. “Biosensors: Fundamentals, Technologies and Applications” GBF Monographs, vol. 17, pp. 174-178, 1991 Germany.
Hakan Nygren et al. “Kinetics of Antibody-Binding to Surface-Immobilized Antigen: Influence of Mass Transport on the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 107, No. 2 pp. 560-566, Oct. 1985 Academic Press, Inc.
Martin Malmsten et al. “Effects of Hydrophilization and Immobilization on the Interfacial Behavior of Immunoglobulins”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Sicence 177, pp. 70-78, 1996 Academic Press, Inc.
Pentti Tengvall et al. “Temporal Studies on the Deposition of Complement on Human Colostrum IgA and Serum Immobilized on Methylated Silicon”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 35, pp. 81-91, 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Huaiyou Wang et al. “Assembly of Antibodies in Lipid Membranes for Biosensor Development”, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 53 pp. 163-181, 1995 Humana Press Inc.
G. Elender et al. “Wetting and Dewetting of Si/SiO2-Wafers by Free and Lipid-Monolayer Covered Aqueous Solutions Under Controlled Humidity”, Journal de Physique, II France 4 pp. 455-479, Mar. 1994.
C.F. Mandenius et al. “Coupling of Biomolecules to Silicon Surfaces for use in ellipsometry and other related techniques”, Methods in Enzymology, vol. 137, pp. 389-394, 1988 Academic Press, Inc.
A.W. Flounders et al. “Patterning of immobilized antibody layers via photolithography and oxygen plasma exposure”, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 12, No. 6 pp. 447-456, 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd., Great Britain.
A. Ahluwalia et al. “A comparative study of protein immobilization techniques for optical immunosensors”, Biosensors and Bioelectronics 7, (1991) pp. 207-214, 1992 Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd.
Dr. Rudolf Oldenbourg “Metamorph Imaging System”, http://www.image1.com/products/metapolscope/ Universal Imaging Corporation Last Updated Jun. 10, 1999 pp. 1-2.
Dr. Rudolf Oldenbourg “A new view on polarization microscopy”, Nature, vol. 381, pp. 811-812, Jun. 27, 1996.
Clifford C. Hoyt et al. “Structural analysis with quantitative birefringence imaging”, American Laboratory, pp. 34-42, Jul. 1999.
Dirk Honig et al. “Direct visualization of monolayers at the air-water interface by Brewster angle microscopy”, J. Phys. Chem., pp. 4590 & 4592, 1991 American Chemical Society.
S. Henon et al. “Microscope at the Brewster angle: direct observation of first-order phase transitions in monolayers”, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 62, (4) pp. 936-939, Apr. 1991 American Institute of Physics.
Gang Jin et al. “A biosensor concept based on imaging ellipsometry for visualization of biomolecular interactions”, Analytical Biochemistry 232, pp. 69-72, 1995.
Pentti Tengvall et al. “Complement activation by 3-mercapto-1,2-propanediol immobilized on gold surfaces”, Biomaterials vol. 17, No. 10 pp. 1001-1007, 1995 Elsevier Science Ltd., Great Britain.
H. Arwin “Spectroscopic ellipsometry and biology: recent developments and challenges”, Thin Solid Films 313-314, pp. 7640774, 1998 Elsevier Science S.A.
Christopher Palmer “Diffraction Grating Handbook”, pp. 35-44, 2000 Richardson Grating Laboratory, Rochester, New York.
Erwin G. Loewen “Diffraction Gratings, Ruled and Holographic”, Applied Optics and Optical Engineering, vol. IX, pp. 33-71, Bausch and Lomb, Inc., Rochester, New York 1983 Academic Press, Inc.
Willems, Goerge M., et al., Adsorption and Conversion of Prothrombin on a Rotating Disc, Blood, Jul. 15, 1993, vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 497-504.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110157693 A1 Jun 2011 US