Many steam turbine apparatus are known for generating power. Today's power plants need to meet the growing demand for electricity while achieving efficient combustion, low emissions, and no net CO2 releases into the environment. Biomass boilers equipped with new combustion techniques enhance efficiency, which, results in lower heat rates. Emissions control devices used with such boilers significantly reduce NOx and CO emissions so that higher energy demands can met.
Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) (chemical reduction via a reducing agent and a catalyst) is utilized in large stationary fossil fuel combustion units such as electrical utility boilers, industrial boilers, process heaters, gas turbines, and reciprocating internal combustion engines to reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions. Nitrous oxide is a common NOx emission. SCR is capable of NOx reduction efficiencies in the range of 70% to 95% and CO reduction efficiencies in the range of 70% to 85%, and is effective only within a given temperature range. The optimum SCR operating temperature range varies from 480° F. to 800° F., depending on the type of catalyst used and the flue gas composition. The present invention is directed to selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems and methods for reducing emissions (primarily NOx) from large stationary solid fuel combustion units.
The SCR process chemically reduces the NOx molecule to nitrogen and water vapor and oxidizes the CO and CO2 (carbon dioxide). A reagent such as ammonia or urea is injected into the ductwork, downstream of a combustion unit. For example, waste gas (also called flue gas) from a biomass boiler mixes with the reagent and enters a reactor module containing catalyst. The hot flue gas and reagent diffuse through the catalyst. The reagent reacts selectively with the NOx within a specified temperature range and in the presence of the catalyst and oxygen. The term “downstream” refers to processes that occur later on in the sequence of flue gas treatment beginning from flue gas creation in the biomass boiler and ending with the exit of the treated flue gas from the stack.
Temperature, the amount of reducing agent, injection grid design, and catalyst activity are factors that determine the removal efficiency of an SCR. The use of a catalyst results in two primary advantages of the SCR process over the selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) process: higher NOx control efficiency and reactions within a lower and broader temperature range. However, the benefits are accompanied by a significant increase in capital and operating cost. SNCR is a method to reduce NOx emissions by injecting, for example, ammonia or urea into the firebox of the boiler to react with the nitrogen oxides formed in the combustion process. This results in elemental nitrogen (N2), carbon dioxide (CO2), and water (H2O).
SCR systems are sensitive to contamination and plugging (e.g., from contaminants in the untreated gas). Accordingly, SCR's may be tuned to remove contaminants. Part of tuning involves ensuring a proper distribution of ammonia in the gas stream and uniform gas velocity through the catalyst. Without tuning, SCRs can exhibit inefficient NOx reduction along with excessive ammonia slip due to not utilizing the catalyst surface area effectively. Ammonia slip is an industry term for ammonia passing through the SCR un-reacted. This occurs when ammonia is: over injected into gas stream, temperatures are too low for ammonia to react, or catalyst has degraded.
The present invention is directed to a selective catalytic reduction system and method for reducing nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions comprising a boiler producing emissions, a particulate control device receiving emissions from the boiler, a selective catalytic reduction unit (SCR) receiving emissions from the boiler and reducing nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions, and an heat exchanger located downstream of the selective catalytic reduction unit (SCR). The boiler may be of any type, e.g., wood-fired, coal-fired, etc. In one embodiment of the present invention (e.g.,
The present drawings demonstrate that there are several different locations downstream of the combustion unit 1 where SCR systems can be installed to effect the present invention.
Solid biomass-fired combustion units 1 generate much more particulate matter (PM) than coal fired or liquid/gaseous fueled combustion units. PM creates fouling problems for SCRs, reducing catalyst life. In addition, the flue gas from biomass combustion units 1 contains certain impurities which attack the catalyst used in SCRs significantly reducing catalyst life and increasing operating (catalyst replacement) costs. As a result, SCRs for biomass combustion units 1 (see
For solid biomass-fired combustion units 1 that utilize a baghouse for PM control, an SCR 2 can be added downstream of the baghouse 6 where temperatures could be as low as 320° F. A baghouse 6 has the ability to trap smaller particles and a larger amount of them on the bag compared to an ESP 6 so the catalyst manufacturers can use a smaller pitch on their catalyst charge. There are three primary types of baghouses, mechanical shaker, reverse air and reverse jet. Each baghouse type uses a bag for trapping and removing particulates in the flue gas. When particles are trapped on the bag, they will form a filter cake that will also trap a larger amount of the aerosol poisons in the flue gas before they reach the catalyst (catalyst will not deactivate as rapidly, so they can use a smaller catalyst volume). The main drawback of using a baghouse 6 is that operational temperatures are lower, so the catalyst would not be as active and more catalyst volume is needed. In
Solid biomass-fired combustion units 1 that utilize an ESP for PM control (mainly combustors with grates rather than fluid beds), can run at a higher temperature than a baghouse 6 which allows the catalyst to be more reactive, hence less catalyst. SCR's installed on solid biomass-fired combustion units with ESP's have increased flue gas temperature by re-heating the flue gas with fossil fuels or other waste heat. An additional heat exchanger is added downstream of the SCR 2 to capture the extra energy put into those systems, which makes these systems expensive to install and expensive to operate. As a result, few installations have been installed in the United States.
SNCR 4 (chemical reduction of NOx via a reducing agent) systems are used on a range of boiler configurations including: dry bottom wall fired and tangentially fired units, wet bottom units, stokers, and fluidized bed units. These units fire a variety of fuels such as coal, oil, gas, biomass, and waste. SNCR 4 is capable of NOx reduction efficiencies in the range of 30% to 50%, and is effective only within a given temperature range. The NOx reduction reaction occurs at temperatures between 1600° F. to 2100° F. SNCR 4 tends to be less effective at lower levels of uncontrolled NOx and is better suited for applications with high levels of PM, such as biomass, in the waste gas stream than SCR 2.
SNCR 4 is based on the chemical reduction of the NOx molecule nitrogen (N2) and water vapor (H2O). A nitrogen based reducing agent such as ammonia or urea is injected into the post combustion flue gas. The reduction reaction with NOx is favored over other chemical reaction processes at temperatures ranging between 1600° F. and 2100° F.; therefore, it is considered a selective chemical process.
Both ammonia and urea are used as reagents. Urea-based systems have advantages over ammonia based systems because urea is non-toxic, less volatile liquid that can be stored and handled more safely. In addition, urea solution droplets can penetrate farther into the flue gas when injected into the boiler 1, enhancing the mixing with the flue gas which is difficult in large boilers. However, urea is more expansive than ammonia. The Normalized Stoichiometric Ratio (NSR) defines the ratio of reagent to NOx required to achieve the targeted NOx reduction. In practice, more than the theoretical amount of reagent needs to be injected into the boiler flue gas to obtain a specific level of NOx reduction. This excess is referred to as ammonia slip. Ammonia slip may cause: 1) formation of ammonium sulfates, which can plug or corrode downstream components, 2) ammonia absorption into fly ash, which may affect disposal or reuse of the ash, and 3) increased plume visibility. As a result, facilities attempt to keep ammonia slip levels to less than 20 parts per million.
A hybrid SNCR/SCR NOx reduction system is a system (as seen in
In the disclosed embodiments the present invention enables the addition of an SCR 2 without the need to re-heat the flue gas. This eliminates the additional costly equipment necessary to re-heat the flue gasses and to capture the extra energy put into re-heating the flue gases.
The flue gas temperature exiting the biomass boiler 1 is in the range of 700° F. to 800° F. and is optimally about 750° F. To improve the efficiency of the biomass boiler 1, one or more heat exchangers 3, 5 are located downstream of the boiler 1 (see
Due to the extremely high cost of the NOx emission reduction credits that would be required without an effective SCR, Applicant developed a hybrid SNCR/SCR NOx reduction system (see
Locating one of the heat exchangers, e.g., air pre-heater 5 after SCR 2, enables the addition of a conventional high efficiency SCR without the use of re-heating the flue gas. That is, locating one of the heat exchangers, e.g., air pre-heater 5 (or economizer 3) after SCR 2, enables operation of the SCR 2 without having to heat the flue gas entering SCR 2 with natural gas, another thermal heater or a reheater. This results in a much more cost effective CO/NOx reduction system.
In order to simultaneously reduce CO and NOx emissions, the SNCR may need to be eliminated, or ammonia slip significantly minimized, because the ammonia slip from the SNCR will react with the CO catalyst and produce additional NOx. Thus, the NOx reduced by the SNCR system could be almost totally offset by NOx produced by the CO catalyst. Thus, the hybrid system is not utilized in those situations where NOx and CO reductions are required.
The present disclosure includes a right-side elevation drawing (
As noted above, the present SCR NOx and CO Reduction System does not require any additional equipment, other than the SCR. This results in significant cost reduction and savings.
While a preferred embodiment of the disclosure is shown and described, it is envisioned that those skilled in the art may devise various modifications and equivalents without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure as recited in the following claims. Although the present invention has been described and illustrated in detail, it is to be clearly understood that the same is by way of illustration and example only, and is not to be taken by way of limitation. The spirit and scope of the present invention are to be limited only by the terms of the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of the filing date of prior U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/357,235 filed Jun. 22, 2010, the subject matter of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61357235 | Jun 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13527047 | Jun 2012 | US |
Child | 13917702 | US | |
Parent | 13164249 | Jun 2011 | US |
Child | 13527047 | US |