The present invention relates to firearms, and specifically to bipods for use with a light-weight machine gun. A machine gun is not a shoulder-fired weapon like a rifle. It may be fired from the hip but is best fired when supported at the muzzle end by a bipod or other structure. Machine guns are heavy, they become quite hot when fired, and the forces associated with rapid firing makes it difficult to maintain accurate targeting unless the muzzle end is properly supported.
A bipod has been a staple accessory for many military firearms since the beginning of firearm development. The bipod generally cradles the barrel of a firearm and has two legs that can be planted on the ground. The bipod provides stability and support for the weapon when fired, especially when fired in long bursts.
To be effective, a machine gun must be highly mobile and rapidly deployable. The light-weight machine gun with its bipod must be capable of being removed from one position, carried in a variety of transportation vehicles (e.g. personnel carriers, airplanes, open trucks, etc) to another position, and set up quickly, and the attached bipod should not interfere with that redeployment. A bipod must also meet other common military objectives such as low weight, ease of use, simple construction, low cost, and high durability.
The twentieth century advent of the light-weight machine gun and the mechanized military has led to a refinement in the state of the art of bipods. Far from just a simple inverted V, current bipods are more complicated devices that include telescoping legs, swivel mounts, and folding structures. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,351,224, issued to Curtis, teaches a pair of L-shaped channels that telescope and fold from a deployed position to a stowed position. This bipod only allows for one direction of leg travel and each leg must be folded individually. U.S. Pat. No. 4,625,620, issued to Harris, teaches a pair of telescoping tubular legs that are individually folded and adjusted. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,711,103, issued to Keng, a swivel mount is incorporated into a bipod that allows a gunner to aim the weapon while keeping the bipod stationary. Keng also teaches a pair of telescoping tubular legs that are frictionally locked.
The prior art of firearm bipods, while extensive, is not without shortcomings. Many of the designs have many parts. One significant drawback to the prior art is that the bipod legs must be deployed separately, i.e. the legs must be unfolded one at a time rather than with a single motion. This means the user must either make two separate motions, or must set the gun down and unfold the legs with both hands. The releasing mechanisms that allow the legs to telescope and fold, such as the one disclosed by Curtis, are often overly complex, unreliable, or create a device that is somewhat unwieldy when transported in a small vehicle. Many of the designs, such as the one employing tubular legs with frictional locks as disclosed by Keng, are not suitable for military applications because they are not suitable for combat; dirt or damage to the legs can interfere with the telescoping.
The bipod disclosed in related patent, U.S. Pat. No. 6,763,627, issued to Kaempe, while a significant improvement over the prior art, also suffers in the rugged environment of use. Certain parts loosen or break, such as the e-clip, or become clogged with dirt or sand making the deployment of the legs of the bipod difficult. Therefore, there remains a need for an improved bipod that will be more robust, and easier and quicker to use than prior art bipods.
Briefly recited and according to its major aspects, the present invention is a bipod for a firearm such as a light-weight machine gun in which the telescoping legs can be deployed with one hand. The present invention has two legs that are connected by spring-based system that allows the legs to be deployed from a stowed position by applying pressure to just one leg. The legs of the present bipod may be stored facing either towards the stock of the gun or towards the muzzle. Improved pivot pins made with a cylinder within a cylinder facilitate repeated pivoting the legs between a parallel orientation, such as when in the stored position, and a splayed orientation such as when in the deployed position.
When the legs are folded from the stored position to the deployed position, the spring-based system acts on the legs, causing them to deploy. The spring-based system is housed inside a body that supports a yoke cradling the barrel of the gun in such a way that the gun and its yoke can be rotated radially through a small angle with respect to the body allowing the barrel of the machine gun to traverse left and right without moving the deployed bipod legs. The yoke is held securely to the body so that despite extended and rough handling, the yoke remains freely rotatable.
Each leg can telescope incrementally between a minimum length and a maximum length, using spring-loaded buttons to lock the legs in place once the desired length is reached. However, because of the design of the buttons, the user can extend the legs simply by pulling on the end of the leg. The foot of each leg is large enough to provide firm footing on a variety of surfaces including softer surfaces such as mud and sand.
An important feature of the present invention is the improved security of the attachment of the yoke to the body. The use of a stepped screw with compression spring assures a firm hold between the two.
Another important feature is the larger feet of the telescoping legs. The larger feet are more than an inch and one half in diameter as opposed to less than an inch for better stability on softer ground.
Still another feature of the present invention is the use of pivot pins each comprising a pin assembly formed by placing a cylinder within a cylinder to allow the two legs to pivot with respect to the body. The pin assembly consists of an inner coiled cylinder captured by an outer slotted cylinder. The inner cylinder exerts and distributes spring pressure uniformly absorbing shock and vibration outwards against the slotted cylinder to increase strength and detention.
Other features and their advantages will be apparent to those skilled in the art of firearm accessory design and fabrication from a careful reading of the Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments accompanied by the following drawings.
In the drawings,
The preferred embodiment of the present invention is a bipod with telescoping legs that can be deployed with one hand.
Referring now to
Bipod 10 is shown in the deployed configuration in
Legs 12 and 14 are telescoping. Here, internal rods 34, 36, in tubes 38 and 40 provide this telescoping capability (only one rod, rod 34, is shown in
Buttons 44, 46 will extend through holes 48, 50, when in rods 34, 36, bring buttons 44, 46, in registration with holes 48, 50, and of tubes 38, 40, and, by doing so, prevent telescopic collapse of legs 12, 14. However, because buttons 44, 46, are spring-loaded and curved, they permit telescopic extension of legs 12, 14, merely by pulling on feet 22, 24. In particular, buttons 44, 46, are oriented to have a major dimension parallel to the long axis of rods 34, 36. Each button 44, 46, has a first end 60 toward body 16 and a second end 62 oriented toward feet 22, 24 (only one button, button 44, is shown exploded in
Referring to
Referring in particular to
Pins 88, 90, may each be formed of a first cylinder 110 within a second cylinder 112, as best seen in
Inside body 16 is a compression spring 92 that encircles tie member 82 and is flanked by two plungers 94 (see
Meanwhile plungers 94, urged by compression spring 92, in turn urge legs 12, 14, to the splayed, deployed position whenever legs 12, 14, are rotated from either of two stored positions. Plungers 94 accomplish this by the engagement of their leading edges 102 against legs 12, 14, at points just below where pins 88, 90, connect tie member 82 to legs 12, 14. By applying pressure at that point, leading edges 102 of plungers 94 cause legs 12, 14, to pivot about pins 88, 90, to move tops 78, 80, into cutout portions 72, 96, but only when legs 12, 14, have been rotated to the point where tops 78, 80 are able to be received within the aligned cutout portions 72, 74, i.e., to the position where they are to be deployed.
When legs 12, 14, have been rotated to either stowed position, tops 78, 80, will not be aligned for receipt into cutout portions 72, 96, and no rotation of legs 12, 14, can take place. In fact, when bipod 10 is in either stored position, leading edge 102 of plunger 94 will be engaging legs 12, 14, both above and below pins 88, 90 so no rotation will take place. Preferably, leading edge 102 of each plunger 94 has a pair of concave curves 104 formed on it (best seen in
In use, bipod 10 is mounted to a machine gun and, if not already in one of the two stored positions, is placed in either stored positions by first pushing legs 12, 14, together so that they are parallel. Then legs 12, 14, can be rotated while held in parallel to either the position shown in
To deploy bipod 10, either leg 12, 14, can be grasped and rotated 90° toward the ground from either stored position. As leg 12 or 14 reaches the 90° point, compression spring 92 will force plungers 94 laterally and push legs 12, 14, outward at feet 22, 24. The user can then grasp either foot 22, 24, of legs, 12, 14, and pull to extend the length of that leg. At intervals along the length of legs 12, 14 as they are being telescopingly extended, buttons 44, 46, on rods 34, 36, will come into registration with holes 48, 50 in tubes 38, 40, so that they will extend through holes 48, 50. If feet 22, 24, are pulled farther, buttons 44, 46, will be crammed into rods 34, 36, by tubes 38, 40, to allow additional length, until the desired lengths for legs 12, 14, are reached and buttons 44, 46, have again come into registration with another set of holes 48, 50.
Once bipod 10 is in the deployed position, the machine gun on which it is mounted can be placed in position and the gunner can check his or her field of fire by rotating yoke 18 through the angle permitted by ledges 64 on body 16. He can also rotate the machine gun axially through the angle permitted by ledges 110 on yoke 18.
It will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art of firearm accessory design and fabrication that many changes and substitutions can be made to the foregoing preferred embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, defined by the appended claims.
The priority benefit of U.S. provisional patent application 61/107,555, filed Oct. 22, 2008, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference, is claimed. This application is related to U.S. Pat. No. 6,763,627 issued to the present applicant Jul. 20, 2004, and which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1524973 | Hazelton | Feb 1925 | A |
1890423 | Teagarden | Dec 1932 | A |
2436349 | Adams | Feb 1948 | A |
2807904 | Kreske | Oct 1957 | A |
2919093 | Mooney | Dec 1959 | A |
3235997 | Stoner | Feb 1966 | A |
3235998 | Hadley | Feb 1966 | A |
3745879 | Asikainen et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
4351224 | Curtis | Sep 1982 | A |
4397112 | York | Aug 1983 | A |
4470216 | Harris | Sep 1984 | A |
4580483 | Garbini | Apr 1986 | A |
4607561 | Frimer | Aug 1986 | A |
4625620 | Harris | Dec 1986 | A |
4776124 | Clifton | Oct 1988 | A |
4787290 | Argon | Nov 1988 | A |
4903425 | Harris | Feb 1990 | A |
5074188 | Harris | Dec 1991 | A |
5194678 | Kramer | Mar 1993 | A |
5410835 | Vetter | May 1995 | A |
5711103 | Keng | Jan 1998 | A |
5815974 | Keng | Oct 1998 | A |
5852892 | Bilgeri et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6289622 | Desch et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6487807 | Kopman et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6517133 | Seegmiller et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6763627 | Kaempe | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6829857 | Houtsma | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6843015 | Sharp | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7111424 | Moody et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7401431 | Pierce et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7409791 | Moody et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7426800 | Pierce et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7478496 | Bender | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7571563 | Peterson | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7614174 | Beltz | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7676977 | Cahill et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7743545 | Moody et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7779572 | Potterfield et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7793454 | Beltz | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7823317 | Potterfield et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7861452 | Moody et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7909301 | Faifer | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7946070 | Elhart | May 2011 | B1 |
7946071 | Cauley | May 2011 | B2 |
7954272 | Potterfield et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20050241206 | Teetzel et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060248774 | Pierce et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277809 | Moody et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61107555 | Oct 2008 | US |