Bipolar electrosurgical instrument for sealing vessels

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7241296
  • Patent Number
    7,241,296
  • Date Filed
    Monday, December 15, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 10, 2007
    17 years ago
Abstract
A bipolar electrosurgical instrument has opposable seal surfaces on its jaws for grasping and sealing vessels and vascular tissue. Inner and outer instrument members allow arcuate motion of the seal surfaces. An open lockbox provides a pivot with lateral support to maintain alignment of the lateral surfaces. Ratchets on the instrument members hold a constant closure force on the tissue during the seal process. A shank portion on each member is tuned to provide an appropriate spring force to hold the seal surfaces together. During surgery, the instrument can be used to grasp and clamp vascular tissue and apply bipolar electrosurgical current through the clamped tissue. In one embodiment, the seal surfaces are partially insulated to prevent a short circuit when the instrument jaws are closed together. In another embodiment, the seal surfaces are removably mounted on the jaws.
Description
BACKGROUND

1. Field of the Invention


This invention relates to an electrosurgical instrument for permanently closing vessels in a human or animal, and more particularly to a bipolar electrosurgical instrument that seals vessels and vascular tissue by applying a combination of pressure and electrosurgical current.


2. Background of Related Art


A hemostat is commonly used in surgical procedures to grasp, dissect and clamp tissue. It is typically a simple pliers-like tool that uses mechanical action between its jaws to constrict vessels without cutting them. It is also typical for hemostats to have an interlocking ratchet between the handles so that the device can be clamped and locked in place.


Many hemostats are used in a typical open-surgical procedure. Once vascular tissue has been clamped with a hemostat, it is common for a surgeon to tie a suture around the tissue to close it off permanently prior to removing the hemostat. Several hemostats may be left in the surgical field until the surgeon has the opportunity to tie a suture around each section of clamped tissue.


Small blood vessels have been closed using electrosurgical instruments without the need for sutures. For example, neurosurgeons have used bipolar instruments to coagulate vessels in the brain that are smaller than two millimeters in diameter. These bipolar instruments are typically tweezers-like devices with two arms that can be deflected toward each other to grasp tissue. However, it has been found that these instruments are not capable of sealing blood vessels with diameters larger than about two millimeters. There has been a long-felt need for an easy way to seal larger vessels and vascular tissue bundles without the need for sutures.


It is thought that the process of coagulating small vessels is fundamentally different than vessel sealing. Coagulation is defined as a process of desiccating tissue wherein the tissue cells are ruptured and dried. Vessel sealing is defined as the process of liquefying the collagen in the tissue so that it crosslinks and reforms into a fused mass. Thus, coagulation of small vessels is sufficient to permanently close them. Larger vessels need to be sealed to assure permanent closure.


A number of bipolar electrosurgical forceps and clamps are known in the field. However, these instruments are not designed to apply the correct pressure to a blood vessel to achieve a lasting seal. All of these instruments also suffer from the drawback that they do not combine the simplicity and familiarity of a hemostat with a bipolar electrosurgical circuit.


An example of a bipolar electrosurgical power curve for vessel sealing is disclosed in a U.S. Patent application entitled, “Energy Delivery System for Vessel Sealing,” Ser. No. 08/530,495, filed Sep. 19, 1995, and is hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this disclosure.


A U.S. Patent application entitled, “Vascular Tissue Sealing Pressure Control and Method,” Ser. No. 08/530,450, filed on Sep. 19, 1995, discloses another surgical tool for sealing vessels, and is hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this disclosure.


U.S. Pat. No. 371,664 discloses a pair of electric forceps with positive and negative electric poles located on the jaws.


U.S. Pat. No. 728,883 discloses an electrothermic instrument in which electricity is used to heat one of the jaws of the instrument.


U.S. Pat. No. 1,586,645 discloses a bipolar instrument for coagulating tissue.


U.S. Pat. No. 2,002,594 discloses a bipolar laparoscopic instrument for treating tissue, whereby coagulation and cutting of tissue can be performed with the same instrument.


U.S. Pat. No. 2,176,479 discloses an instrument for finding and removing metal particles. The jaws of the instrument are designed to complete an electrical circuit when conductive material is placed therebetween. An insulated pivot and an insulated ratchet are used to prevent a short circuit.


U.S. Pat. No. 3,651,811 discloses a bipolar electrosurgical instrument for cutting and coagulating tissue.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,005,714 discloses bipolar coagulation forceps with jaws that open and close by way of an actuating sleeve.


U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,370,980 and 5,116,332 disclose an electrocautery hemostats wherein the hemostatic clamping function and the electrocautery function may be accomplished with a single instrument. Monopolar electrosurgical designs are shown and described.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,552,143 discloses a family of removable switch electrocautery instruments, including an electrocautery hemostat. Monopolar electrosurgical designs are shown and described.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,026,370 discloses an electrocautery forceps instrument having an enclosed electrical switching mechanism. Monopolar electrosurgical designs are shown and described.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,443,463 discloses coagulating forceps having a plurality of electrodes.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,484,436 discloses bipolar electrosurgical instruments for simultaneously cutting and coagulating tissue.


The article, “The Mechanism of Blood Vessel Closure by High Frequency Electrocoagulation” discloses experiments upon the blood vessels of dogs. The sentence starting on the last line of page 823 describes “an electrode forceps, each of the blades being insulated form the other and each connected to a terminal of the high frequency generator.”


The article, “Studies on coagulation and development of an automatic computerized bipolar coagulator” discloses on page 150 that, “It was not possible to coagulate safely arteries with a diameter larger than 2 to 2.5 mm.” On page 151, line 5, it is noted that “Veins can be coagulated safely up to a diameter of 3 to 4 mm.”


Russian Patent 401,367 discloses a bipolar instrument with a linkage that brings the working jaws together in a parallel manner.


Prior disclosures have not provided a design for a bipolar electrosurgical instrument capable of conveniently applying a constant pressure, from a calibrated spring-loaded source held by a ratchet, that is sufficient to seal vessels and vascular tissue.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is the general objective of this invention to provide a bipolar electrosurgical instrument that can fuse tissue without the need for a suture or surgical clips. The instrument conducts electrosurgical current between two seal surfaces located on opposable jaws. The electrosurgical current passes through tissue clamped between the jaws and remolds the collagen to fuse the tissue and form a permanent seal.


One advantage of the invention is that blood vessels can be quickly fused and permanently sealed against passage of blood or other fluids. The instrument thereby reduces operating-room time, provides improved access to target tissues, and increases the efficiency of the surgical procedure.


Another advantage is that no sutures or staples are required to permanently seal blood vessels, and no foreign material is left in the body of the patient.


Yet another advantage is that vessels can be sealed as the instrument is applied, and then the instrument can be removed from the surgical field. This keeps the surgical field clear of extraneous tools that may hinder the surgeon's access to the surgical site.


Yet another advantage is that the proper amount of pressure can be applied by the instrument to the vessel or vessels, thereby increasing the likelihood of a successful surgical outcome.


The bipolar electrosurgical instrument of the present invention comprises inner and outer members connected by an open lockbox, interlocking ratchet teeth, and electrical terminals with conductive pathways leading to seal surfaces. The inner and outer members each have a ring handle near a proximal end and an opposable seal surface near a distal end. The proximal end is held and controlled by the surgeon, while the distal end is used to manipulate tissue. The open lockbox joins the inner and outer members to allow arcuate motion of each opposable seal surface. The open lockbox is generally designed to provide lateral support so that both seal surfaces move in approximately the same plane. The seal surfaces are preferably aligned opposite each other when the instrument jaws are closed together. To provide lateral support, the open lockbox comprises a pivot and at least one flange extending over the inner member and attached to the outer member.


The instrument is tuned to provide a proper closure force by adjusting the dimensions of a shank portion on each of the inner and outer members. The shank portion is defined as the portion of each member bounded by its respective ratchet stub and the open lockbox. During use, the surgeon squeezes the ring handles to compress tissue between the seal surfaces. The shank portion of each member flexes in the manner of a cantilever spring, and can be locked in a deflected position with the ratchet to hold a constant force. It is one of the objects of the invention to provide a range of ratchet stops that correspond to a range of appropriate closure forces on the seal surfaces of the instrument.


Ratchet teeth are located on each member near the ring handle. The ratchet teeth are generally designed to interlock against the spring force from the shanks. The spring force is thus transmitted through the pivot to hold the seal surfaces against each other. A range of closure forces is required in an instrument, depending on the type and thickness of the tissue to be sealed. It is thus desirable to have several ratchet stops, each providing a progressively larger force to the seal surfaces.


An electrical connector is located on each ring handle. The electrical connector may be a metal post that is integrally formed with the member and ring handle. Bipolar electrical cables from an electrosurgical generator are connected to the instrument at the electrical connectors. An electrically conductive path on each of the inner and outer members conducts the electrosurgical current to the seal surfaces. The electrically conductive path may be along the stainless steel members. An electrically insulative coating is preferably bonded to the outer surfaces of the members to protect the surgeon and patient against inadvertent electrical burns.


The following terms are herein defined as follows. The applied force of the instrument is the total force being applied to the tissue between the jaws. The jaws are the members near the distal end of the instrument, from the lockbox to the tip of the instrument. The electrodes are the metal surfaces that conduct electricity to the tissue. The seal surface is the feature on the electrode that comes in direct contact with the tissue. The shank is the portion of each member between the lockbox and the ratchet. The ring handles are the elements on the members, near the proximal end of the instrument, that are grasped by the surgeon. The lockbox is the structure that allows the members to pivot, including the pivot pin and other cooperating surfaces. The inner member is the member that is generally captured in the interior of the lockbox. The outer member is the member that is on the outside of the lockbox. Electrode pressure is calculated by dividing the applied force over the complete area of the seal surface. Tissue pressure is calculated by dividing the applied force over the area of tissue placed between the jaws.


It has been found through experimentation that an instrument for vessel fusion (also referred herein as vessel sealing) should compress the tissue with a proper amount of pressure between the instrument jaws. The pressure is preferably sufficient to close any blood-carrying lumen. The pressure is preferably low enough so that the tissue is not split apart within the instrument jaws.


The jaws of the instrument should not short-circuit during the procedure. The tissue will typically decrease in thickness when electrosurgical current is applied, thereby allowing the seal surfaces to move closer together. This decrease in thickness should not result in the electrodes making direct contact with each other. Otherwise, a short circuit could give the electrosurgical current a preferential path around the tissue and may result in a poor seal.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a bipolar instrument for vessel fusion, shown partially exploded.



FIG. 2 is a schematic plan view of a bipolar instrument for vessel fusion having a longer curved jaw.



FIG. 3 is a side view of the instrument shown in FIG. 2.



FIG. 4 is a schematic plan view of an alternative embodiment of an instrument for vessel fusion having a shorter curved jaw.



FIG. 5 is side view of the instrument shown in FIG. 4.



FIG. 6 is a schematic plan view of an alternative embodiment of an instrument for vessel fission having a straight jaw.



FIG. 7 is a side view of the instrument shown in FIG. 7.



FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a shoulder pin.



FIG. 9 is a side view of a shoulder pin.



FIG. 10 is a front view of a shoulder pin.



FIGS. 11A and 11B is a top view each of a pair of seal surfaces showing conductive regions and insulative regions that prevent a short circuit when the seal surfaces are mated in opposition.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring to FIG. 1, the instrument 10 has an inner member 11 and an outer member 12. The members 11 and 12 are connected through an open lockbox 13 which has a gap between flanges 33. The terms “inner” and “outer” are used to distinguish the members 11 and 12, and their component parts, according to the members' respective positions at the open lockbox 13. The inner member 11 is fitted generally within the inner surfaces of the open lockbox 13 and is captured by the flanges 33. The outer member generally forms the outside surfaces of the open lockbox 13.


The inner member 11 has an inner shank 14, an inner jaw 16, and an inner ring handle 20. Similarly, the outer member 12 has an outer shank 15, an outer jaw 17, and an outer ring handle 21. The ring handles, 20 and 21, are designed for a surgeon to hold and manipulate the instrument 10. The jaws, 16 and 17, are designed to grasp tissue between the opposing seal surfaces 18 and 19.


Each shank, 14 and 15, has a respective ratchet stub 24 or 25. Ratchet teeth, 26 and 27, are designed to interlock in a manner that hold the members, 11 and 12, in position. The shanks 14 and 15 are deflected in the manner of a cantilever spring when the jaws are forced together by the surgeon. The deflection of the shanks 14 and 15 produces a spring restoring force that can be opposed by interlocking the ratchet teeth, 26 and 27.


The instrument 10 does not cause a short circuit when the ratchet teeth, 26 and 27, are interlocked. This is accomplished by a suitable selection and placement of electrically insulating materials. In the preferred embodiment, the ratchet teeth 26 and 27 are composed of a polymeric material which is press-fit into the ratchet stubs 24 and 25. A ratchet screw 28 is used in the preferred embodiment to secure the ratchet teeth 26 and 27 into the ratchet stubs 24 and 25. During manufacture, the ratchet teeth 26 and 27 may be formed from a blank after the blank has been press fit into the ratchet stubs 24 and 25.


In a second embodiment, one of the members, 11 or 12, includes the ratchet stub and ratchet teeth as in integral part of the member, while the other member, 12 or 11, has an insulative layer that prevents a short circuit between the members 11 and 12 when the ratchets are engaged.


The open lockbox 13 has the function of providing a pivoting joint for the members 11 and 12. In addition, the flanges 33 provide lateral support to help maintain alignment of the jaws 16 and 17. Closed lockbox designs are typically used in standard hemostat designs, wherein an inner member is completely captured through a slot in an outer member. The open lockbox 13 in present invention has a gap between the flanges 33 that is different from a closed lockbox design. The gap in the open lockbox 13 provides convenient access to install an electrically insulated pivot.


The electrically insulated pivot in the present invention comprises a shoulder washer 29 supporting a lockbox screw 30. The shoulder washer 29 is composed of an electrically insulative material that prevents a short circuit between the members 11 and 12. A large screw cap 31 fits over the head of the lockbox screw 30. A small screw cap 32 fits over the threaded end of the lockbox screw 30.


Each member 11 and 12 is connected to a pole of a bipolar electrosurgical generator. Electrical connectors 22 and 23 are located on the ring handles 20 and 21 to provide a convenient point of connection. The members 11 and 12 are formed of an electrically conductive material, such as stainless steel. The exposed surfaces of the members, except for the connectors 22 and 23 and the seal surfaces 18 and 19, are preferably spray coated with an insulating material.


The characteristics of the bipolar electrosurgical current are determined by the design of the electrosurgical generator. In the preferred embodiment, the generator will have an output wherein the peak-to-peak voltage will not exceed 130 Volts. This is because higher voltages can cause sparking which results in localized burning of tissue which may result in a failure of the tissue weld. The preferred embodiment has the generator capable of producing high frequency output current of at least 2 Amps RMS. High electrical current is important because it heats the tissue sufficiently to melt the collagen. Lower electrical currents will often produce weak tissue welds with low bursting strength.


During operation, the instrument 10 is used to grasp tissue between the seal surfaces 18 and 19. The surgeon squeezes the ring handles 20 and 21 together, causing pressure to be applied to the tissue. The ratchet teeth 26 and 27 are interlocked at the appropriate ratchet setting, depending on the tissue type and tissue thickness. Bipolar electrosurgical current is applied through the instrument and the tissue to cause the tissue to fuse.


The jaws 16 and 17 have a structure and cross-section that resist bending under load. Thus, for purposes of engineering analysis, the shank portions 14 and 15 act as a cantilever supported beam once the seal surfaces 18 and 19 have been mated. The length of this idealized cantilever beam extends from the lockbox screw 30 to the location of the respective ratchet subs 24 or 25. It is possible to model each shank as a cantilever spring having a spring constant. Each ratchet position is designed to transmit a particular closure force to the jaws 16 and 17 against the action of the restoring force of the cantilever spring.


The spring constant is generally a function of Young's Modulus of the shank material, the moment of inertia of the shank, and the length of the shank portion 14 and 15. When the jaws 16 and 17 of the instrument 10 are closed together, each shank 14 and 15 approximates a cantilever-supported beam. It is properly assumed that the deflection of each shank 14 and 15 remains within the linear range of its stress-strain curve. The behavior of such a beam is well known to materials engineers. A large spring constant will result in large closure forces between the seal surfaces 18 and 19. Similarly, a small spring constant will result in a small closure forces between the seal surfaces 18 and 19. The choice of a proper spring constant will depend on the length of the shank 14 or 15 and the distance between ratchet stops 26 and 27.


Experimental results in animal studies suggest that the magnitude of pressure exerted on the tissue by the seal surfaces 18 and 19 is important in assuring a proper surgical outcome. Tissue pressures within a working range of about 3 kg/cm2 to about 16 kg/cm2 and, preferably, within a working range of 7 kg/cm2 to 13 kg/cm2 have been shown to be effective for sealing arteries and vascular bundles. Tissue pressures within the range of about 4 kg/cm2 to about 6.5 kg/cm2 have proven to be particularly effective in sealing arteries and tissue bundles.


It is desirable to tune the spring constant of the shank portions 14 and 15, in conjunction with the placement of the ratchet teeth 26 and 27, such that successive ratchet positions will yield pressures within the working range. In one embodiment, the successive ratchet positions are two millimeters apart.


Pressure on the tissue can be described in several ways. Engineers will recognize that the amount of pressure exerted on the tissue depends on the surface area of the tissue that is in contact with the seal surfaces. In the one embodiment, the width of each seal surface 18 and is in the range of 2 to 5 millimeters, and preferably 4 millimeters width, while the length of each seal surface 18 and 19 is preferably in the range of 10 to 30 millimeters. It has been found through experimentation that at least one interlocking ratchet position preferably holds the closure force between approximately 400 and 650 grams per millimeter of seal surface width. For example, if the width of the seal surface 18 and 19 is 4 millimeters, the closure force is preferably in the range of 1600 grams to 2600 grams. In one embodiment, the closure force is 525 grams per millimeter of width, yielding a closure force of 2100 grams for a 4 millimeter width seal surface 18 and 19.


It has been found experimentally that local current concentrations can result in an uneven tissue effect, and to reduce the possibility of this outcome, each seal surface 18 and 19 has a radiused edge in the preferred embodiment. In addition, a tapered seal surface 18 and 19 has been shown to be advantageous in certain embodiments because the taper allows for a relatively constant pressure on the tissue along the length of the seal surfaces 18 and 19. The width of the seal surfaces 18 and 19 is adjusted, in certain embodiments, wherein the closure force divided by the width is approximately constant along the length.


In one embodiment, a stop 37, made from insulative material, is located in the instrument to maintain a minimum separation of at least about 0.03 millimeters between the seal surfaces 18 and 19, as shown in FIG. 1. The stop 37 reduces the possibility of short circuits between the seal surfaces 18 and 19. In another embodiment, the forceps instrument 10 includes a second or alternative stop 47 which is designed to maintain a minimum separation of at least about 0.03 millimeters between the seal surfaces 18 and 19, as shown in FIG. 1. It is envisioned that the stop may be positioned proximate the lockbox 13, proximate the lockbox screw 30 or adjacent the opposable seal surfaces 18 and 19. Preferably, the stop 37 and/or the stop 47 maintain a separation distance within the range of about 0.03 millimeters to about 0.16 millimeters.


In certain embodiments, as shown in FIG. 11, the seal surfaces 18 and 19 comprise conductive regions 38 and insulative regions 39 arranged such that each conductive region 38 opposes an insulative region 39 when the opposable seal surfaces 18 and 19 are mated in opposition. The seal surfaces 18 and 19, in certain embodiments, may be removable from its respective member 11 or 12 by standard mechanical interfaces, such as a pin and socket arrangement.



FIG. 2 shows an embodiment for a thirty-two millimeter curved seal surface. FIG. 3 is a side view of FIG. 2. The members 11 and 12 in FIG. 2 are formed from American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) 410 stainless steel. The length and cross sectional area of the shank portions 14 and 15 are shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 to provide a spring constant of twenty-five pounds per inch deflection.


The embodiment shown in FIGS. 4 and 5 has a twenty millimeter curved seal surface. The embodiment shown in FIGS. 6 and 7 has a thirty-two millimeter straight seal surface. Each embodiment in FIGS. 2 through 7 is designed to have the look and feel of a standard hemostat.



FIGS. 8, 9 and 10 show three views of a shoulder pin 34 that can be used, in certain embodiments, instead of the lockbox screw 30 to connect the members 11 and 12. The shoulder pin 34 has at least one ramp surface 35 that engages one of the members 11 or 12 to cause increasing mechanical interference as the jaws 16 and 17 move toward each other. In one embodiment, the shoulder pin 34 forms part of the open lockbox 13 to aid alignment of the seal surfaces 18 and 19. In another embodiment, the shoulder pin 34 is used without an open-lockbox 13, and movably pins the members 11 and 12 together without a flange 33. The interference fit may require the calibration of the instrument 10 to insure that the applied force will be sufficient to provide the appropriate working pressure between the seal surfaces 18 and 19. A slightly higher spring constant in the shank portions 14 and 15 is preferably used, depending on the level of interference caused by the shoulder pin.


A method of using the bipolar electrosurgical instrument comprises the following steps. A surgeon grasps the ring handles 20 and 21 on the instrument 10 to manipulate the jaws 16 and 17. A vessel or vascular tissue is compressed between the opposable seal surfaces 18 and 19. The opposable seal surfaces 18 and 19 preferably come together in aligned opposition due to the alignment action of the open-lockbox 13, or in certain embodiments due to the alignment action of the shoulder pin 34. The surgeon further deflects the shank portions 14 and 15 of the members 11 and 12 to engage the ratchet teeth 26 and 27. The engagement of the ratchet teeth 26 and 27 hold the shank portions 14 and 15 in their deflected positions to provide a constant spring force that is transmitted as a closure force to the jaws 16 and 17. An electrosurgical generator is connected to the instrument 10 through connectors 22 and 23 on the ring handles 20 and 21. An electrical switch is used to close a circuit between the generator and the instrument 10. The switch may be a footswitch such as Valleylab's catalog number E6009, available from Valleylab Inc., Boulder Colo. The electrosurgical current flows through an electrically conductive path on each of the inner and outer members 11 and 12 between its respective electrical connector, 22 or 23, and its respective seal surface, 18 or 19. An electrically insulative coating 36 substantially covers each member 11 and 12 to protect the surgeon against electrical arcs. An insulative sheath may also be used to cover the members or the component parts thereof, i.e., handles 20, 21, shanks 14 and 15 and the outer surfaces (non-opposing surfaces) of the jaw members 16, 17.


It is envisioned that the outer surface of the jaw members 16 and 17 may include a nickel-based material, coating, stamping, metal injection molding which is designed to reduce adhesion between the jaw members (or components thereof) with the surrounding tissue during activation and sealing. Moreover, it is also contemplated that other components such as the shanks 14, 15 and the ring handles 20, 21 may also be coated with the same or a different “non-stick” material. Preferably, the non-stick materials are of a class of materials that provide a smooth surface to prevent mechanical tooth adhesions.


It is also contemplated that the tissue sealing surfaces 18 and 19 of the jaw members 16 and 17, respectively, may be manufactured from one (or a combination of one or more) of the following “non-stick” materials: nickel-chrome, chromium nitride, MedCoat 2000 manufactured by The Electrolizing Corporation of OHIO, Inconel 600 and tin-nickel. For example, high nickel chrome alloys and Ni200, Ni201 (˜100% Ni) may be made into electrodes or sealing surfaces by metal injection molding, stamping, machining or any like process.


In addition these materials preferably include an optimal surface energy for eliminating sticking due in part to surface texture and susceptibility to surface breakdown due electrical effects and corrosion in the presence of biologic tissues. It is envisioned that these materials exhibit superior non-stick qualities over stainless steel and should be utilized on the instrument in areas where the exposure to pressure and RF energy can create localized “hot spots” more susceptible to tissue adhesion. As can be appreciated, reducing the amount that the tissue “sticks” during sealing improves the overall efficacy of the instrument.


The tissue sealing surfaces 18 and 19 may also be “coated” with one or more of the above materials to achieve the same result, i.e., a “non-stick surface”. For example, Nitride coatings (or one or more of the other above-identified materials) may be deposited as a coating on another base material (metal or nonmetal) using a vapor deposition manufacturing technique.


One particular class of materials disclosed herein has demonstrated superior non-stick properties and, in some instances, superior seal quality. For example, nitride coatings which include, but not are not limited to: TiN, ZrN, TiAIN, and CrN are preferred materials used for non-stick purposes. CrN has been found to be particularly useful for non-stick purposes due to its overall surface properties and performance. Other classes of materials have also been found to reducing overall sticking. For example, high nickel/chrome alloys with a Ni/Cr ratio of approximately 5:1 have been found to significantly reduce sticking in bipolar instrumentation. One particularly useful non-stick material in this class is Inconel 600. Bipolar instrumentation having electrodes made from or coated with Ni200, Ni201 (˜100% Ni) also showed improved non-stick performance over typical bipolar stainless steel electrodes.


It is to be understood that the above described embodiments are only illustrative of the application of the principles of the present invention. Numerous modifications and alternative arrangements may be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. The appended claims are intended to cover such modifications and arrangements.

Claims
  • 1. A bipolar electrosurgical instrument, comprising: inner and outer members each including a jaw member having an opposable seal surface disposed thereon, the inner and outer members being movable from a first position wherein the opposable seal surfaces are disposed in spaced-apart relation relative to one another to a second position to facilitate grasping tissue between the opposable seal surfaces, the opposable seal surfaces including a non-stick coating for reducing tissue adhesion during the sealing process, the non-stick material being deposited on the opposable seal surfaces and being selected from the group of materials consisting of nitrides and nickel/chrome alloys;at least one connector in electrical communication with the opposable seal surfaces and adapted to electrically couple the opposable seal surfaces to a source of electrosurgical energy to facilitate conducting electrosurgical energy through tissue disposed therebetween during usage of the instrument;at least one stop disposed adjacent to at least one of the opposable seal surfaces to maintain a separation distance between the opposable seal surfaces when the inner and outer members are moved to the second position; anda ratchet disposed on one of the inner and outer members and at least one complementary interlocking mechanical interface disposed on the other of the inner and outer members, the ratchet and the complementary interlocking mechanical interface defining at least one interlocking position which together with the at least one stop member are configured to regulate and to maintain a closure pressure in the range of about 7 kg/cm2 to about 13 kg/cm2 between opposable seal surfaces.
  • 2. A bipolar electrosurgical instrument according to claim 1 wherein the opposable seal surfaces are manufactured from a non-stick material.
  • 3. A bipolar electrosurgical instrument according to claim 1 wherein the at least one stop is manufactured from an insulative material.
  • 4. A bipolar electrosurgical instrument, comprising: inner and outer members each including a jaw member having an opposable seal surface disposed thereon, the inner and outer members being movable from a first position wherein the opposable seal surfaces are disposed in spaced-apart relation relative to one another to a second position to facilitate grasping tissue between the opposable seal surfaces, the opposable seal surfaces including a non-stick coating for reducing tissue adhesion during the sealing process, the non-stick material being deposited on the opposable seal surfaces and including one of TiN, ZrN, TiAIN, CrN, nickel/chrome alloys with a Ni/Cr ratio of approximately 5:1, Inconel 600, Ni200 and Ni201;at least one connector in electrical communication with the opposable seal surfaces and adapted to electrically couple the opposable seal surfaces to a source of electrosurgical energy to facilitate conducting electrosurgical energy through tissue disposed therebetween during usage of the instrument;at least one stop disposed adjacent to at least one of the opposable seal surfaces to maintain a separation distance between the opposable seal surfaces when the inner and outer members are moved to the second position; anda ratchet disposed on one of the inner and outer members and at least one complementary interlocking mechanical interface disposed on the other of the inner and outer members, the ratchet and the complementary interlocking mechanical interface defining at least one interlocking position which together with the at least one stop member are configured to regulate and to maintain a closure pressure in the range of about 7 kg/cm2 to about 13 kg/cm2 between opposable seal surfaces.
  • 5. A bipolar electrosurgical instrument, comprising: inner and outer members each including a jaw member having an opposable seal surface disposed thereon, the inner and outer members being movable from a first position wherein the opposable seal surfaces are disposed in spaced-apart relation relative to one another to a second position to facilitate grasping tissue between the opposable seal surfaces, the opposable seal surfaces being manufactured from a non-stick material for reducing tissue adhesion during the sealing process;at least one connector in electrical communication with the opposable seal surfaces and adapted to electrically couple the opposable seal surfaces to a source of electrosurgical energy to facilitate conducting electrosurgical energy through tissue disposed therebetween during usage of the instrument;at least one stop disposed adjacent to at least one of the opposable seal surfaces to maintain a separation distance between the opposable seal surfaces when the inner and outer members are moved to the second position; anda ratchet disposed on one of the inner and outer members and at least one complementary interlocking mechanical interface disposed on the other of the inner and outer members, the ratchet and the complementary interlocking mechanical interface defining at least one interlocking position which together with the at least one stop member are configured to regulate and to maintain a closure pressure in the range of about 7 kg/cm2 to about 13 kg/cm2 between opposable seal surfaces.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/113,745 filed on Apr. 1, 2002 by Buysse et al. entitled “BIPOLAR ELECTROSURGICAL INSTRUMENT FOR SEALING VESSELS”, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,726,686, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/090,081 filed on Mar. 1, 2002 by Buysse et al. entitled “BIPOLAR ELECTROSURGICAL INSTRUMENT FOR SEALING VESSELS”, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,743,229, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/502,933 filed on Feb. 11, 2000 by Buysse et al. entitled “BIPOLAR ELECTROSURGICAL INSTRUMENT FOR SEALING VESSELS”, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,352,536, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/968,779 filed on Nov. 12, 1997 by Buysse et al. entitled “BIPOLAR ELECTROSURGICAL INSTRUMENT FOR SEALING VESSELS”, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,187,003 the entire contents of all of these applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (382)
Number Name Date Kind
371664 Brannan et al. Oct 1887 A
702472 Pignolet Jun 1902 A
728883 Downes May 1903 A
1586645 Bierman Jun 1926 A
2002594 Wappler et al. May 1935 A
2011169 Wappler Aug 1935 A
2031682 Wappler et al. Feb 1936 A
2176479 Willis Oct 1939 A
2305156 Grubel Dec 1942 A
2632661 Cristofv Mar 1953 A
2668538 Baker Feb 1954 A
2796065 Kapp Jun 1957 A
3459187 Pallotta Aug 1969 A
3643663 Sutter Feb 1972 A
3651811 Hildebrandt et al. Mar 1972 A
3862630 Balamuth Jan 1975 A
3866610 Kletschka Feb 1975 A
3911766 Fridolph et al. Oct 1975 A
3920021 Hiltebrandt Nov 1975 A
3921641 Hulka Nov 1975 A
3938527 Rioux et al. Feb 1976 A
3952749 Fridolph et al. Apr 1976 A
4005714 Hiltebrandt Feb 1977 A
4041952 Morrison, Jr. et al. Aug 1977 A
4074718 Morrison, Jr. Feb 1978 A
4088134 Mazzariello May 1978 A
4128099 Bauer Dec 1978 A
4165746 Burgin Aug 1979 A
4300564 Furihata Nov 1981 A
4370980 Lottick Feb 1983 A
4416276 Newton et al. Nov 1983 A
4452246 Bader et al. Jun 1984 A
4492231 Auth Jan 1985 A
4552143 Lottick Nov 1985 A
4574804 Kurwa Mar 1986 A
4597379 Kihn et al. Jul 1986 A
4600007 Lahodny et al. Jul 1986 A
4655216 Tischer Apr 1987 A
4657016 Garito et al. Apr 1987 A
4671274 Sorochenko Jun 1987 A
4685459 Xoch et al. Aug 1987 A
4763669 Jaeger Aug 1988 A
4827929 Hodge May 1989 A
4887612 Esser et al. Dec 1989 A
4938761 Ensslin Jul 1990 A
4985030 Melzer et al. Jan 1991 A
5007908 Rydell Apr 1991 A
5026370 Lottick Jun 1991 A
5084057 Green et al. Jan 1992 A
5099840 Goble et al. Mar 1992 A
5116332 Lottick May 1992 A
5147357 Rose et al. Sep 1992 A
5151102 Xamiyama et al. Sep 1992 A
5176695 Dulebohn Jan 1993 A
5190541 Abele et al. Mar 1993 A
5196009 Kirwan, Jr. Mar 1993 A
5197964 Parins Mar 1993 A
5215101 Jacobs et al. Jun 1993 A
5217457 Delahuerga et al. Jun 1993 A
5217458 Parins Jun 1993 A
5217460 Knoepfler Jun 1993 A
5219354 Choudhury et al. Jun 1993 A
5244462 Delahuerga et al. Sep 1993 A
5250047 Rydell Oct 1993 A
5258006 Rydell et al. Nov 1993 A
5261918 Phillips et al. Nov 1993 A
5275615 Rose Jan 1994 A
5277201 Stern Jan 1994 A
5282799 Rydell Feb 1994 A
5290286 Parins Mar 1994 A
5304203 El-Mallawany et al. Apr 1994 A
5308357 Lichtman May 1994 A
5318589 Lichtman Jun 1994 A
5324289 Eggers Jun 1994 A
5330471 Eggers Jul 1994 A
5334183 Wuchinich Aug 1994 A
5334215 Chen Aug 1994 A
5336221 Anderson Aug 1994 A
5342359 Rydell Aug 1994 A
5342381 Tidemand Aug 1994 A
5342393 Stack Aug 1994 A
5352222 Rydell Oct 1994 A
5354271 Voda Oct 1994 A
5356408 Rydell Oct 1994 A
5366477 LeMarie, III et al. Nov 1994 A
5368600 Failla et al. Nov 1994 A
5383897 Wholey Jan 1995 A
5389098 Tsuruta et al. Feb 1995 A
5389104 Hahnen et al. Feb 1995 A
5391166 Eggers Feb 1995 A
5391183 Janzen et al. Feb 1995 A
5396900 Slater et al. Mar 1995 A
5403312 Yates et al. Apr 1995 A
5411519 Tovey et al. May 1995 A
5411520 Nash et al. May 1995 A
5413571 Katsaros et al. May 1995 A
5415657 Taymor-Luria May 1995 A
5423810 Goble et al. Jun 1995 A
5425739 Jessen Jun 1995 A
5429616 Schaffer Jul 1995 A
5431674 Basile et al. Jul 1995 A
5437292 Kipshidze et al. Aug 1995 A
5438302 Goble Aug 1995 A
5441517 Kensey et al. Aug 1995 A
5443463 Stern et al. Aug 1995 A
5443464 Russell et al. Aug 1995 A
5443480 Jacobs et al. Aug 1995 A
5445638 Rydell et al. Aug 1995 A
5445658 Durrfeld et al. Aug 1995 A
5451224 Goble et al. Sep 1995 A
5456684 Schmidt et al. Oct 1995 A
5458598 Feinberg et al. Oct 1995 A
5460629 Shlain et al. Oct 1995 A
5462546 Rydell Oct 1995 A
5472443 Cordis et al. Dec 1995 A
5478351 Meade et al. Dec 1995 A
5480409 Riza Jan 1996 A
5484436 Eggers et al. Jan 1996 A
5496317 Goble et al. Mar 1996 A
5496347 Hashiguchi et al. Mar 1996 A
5499997 Sharpe et al. Mar 1996 A
5509922 Aranyi et al. Apr 1996 A
5514134 Rydell et al. May 1996 A
5527313 Scott et al. Jun 1996 A
5531744 Nardella et al. Jul 1996 A
5536251 Evard et al. Jul 1996 A
5540684 Hassler, Jr. Jul 1996 A
5540685 Parins et al. Jul 1996 A
5540715 Katsaros et al. Jul 1996 A
5542945 Fritzsch Aug 1996 A
5558672 Edwards et al. Sep 1996 A
5562699 Heimberger et al. Oct 1996 A
5569241 Edwardds Oct 1996 A
5569243 Kortenbach et al. Oct 1996 A
5571100 Goble et al. Nov 1996 A
5573424 Poppe Nov 1996 A
5573534 Stone Nov 1996 A
5573535 Viklund Nov 1996 A
5582611 Tsuruta et al. Dec 1996 A
5585896 Yamazaki et al. Dec 1996 A
5590570 LeMaire, III et al. Jan 1997 A
5601601 Tal et al. Feb 1997 A
5603711 Parins et al. Feb 1997 A
5603723 Aranyi et al. Feb 1997 A
5611798 Eggers Mar 1997 A
5626578 Tihon May 1997 A
5626609 Zvenyatsky et al. May 1997 A
5630833 Katsaros et al. May 1997 A
5637110 Pennybacker et al. Jun 1997 A
5643294 Tovey et al. Jul 1997 A
5647869 Goble et al. Jul 1997 A
5647871 Levine et al. Jul 1997 A
5649959 Hannam et al. Jul 1997 A
5658281 Heard Aug 1997 A
5662667 Knodel Sep 1997 A
5665100 Yoon Sep 1997 A
5667526 Levin Sep 1997 A
5674220 Fox et al. Oct 1997 A
5681282 Eggers et al. Oct 1997 A
5693051 Schulze et al. Dec 1997 A
5695522 LeMaire, III et al. Dec 1997 A
5700261 Brinkerhoff Dec 1997 A
5702390 Austin et al. Dec 1997 A
5707369 Vaitekunas et al. Jan 1998 A
5709680 Yates et al. Jan 1998 A
5716366 Yates Feb 1998 A
5727428 LeMaire, III et al. Mar 1998 A
5735848 Yates et al. Apr 1998 A
5743906 Parins et al. Apr 1998 A
5755717 Yates et al. May 1998 A
5766130 Selmonosky Jun 1998 A
5766166 Hooven Jun 1998 A
5766170 Eggers Jun 1998 A
5769849 Eggers Jun 1998 A
5772655 Bauer et al. Jun 1998 A
5772670 Brosa Jun 1998 A
5776128 Eggers Jul 1998 A
5776130 Buysse et al. Jul 1998 A
5779701 McBrayer et al. Jul 1998 A
5792137 Carr et al. Aug 1998 A
5792177 Kaseda Aug 1998 A
5797938 Paraschac et al. Aug 1998 A
5797958 Yoon Aug 1998 A
5800449 Wales Sep 1998 A
5807393 Williamson, IV et al. Sep 1998 A
5810808 Eggers Sep 1998 A
5810811 Yates et al. Sep 1998 A
5810877 Roth et al. Sep 1998 A
5814043 Shapeton Sep 1998 A
5820630 Lind Oct 1998 A
5827271 Buysse et al. Oct 1998 A
5827279 Hughett et al. Oct 1998 A
5827281 Levin Oct 1998 A
5833690 Yates et al. Nov 1998 A
5843080 Fleenor et al. Dec 1998 A
5849022 Sakashita et al. Dec 1998 A
5853412 Mayenberger Dec 1998 A
5860976 Billings et al. Jan 1999 A
5876401 Schulze et al. Mar 1999 A
5891141 Rydell Apr 1999 A
5891142 Eggers et al. Apr 1999 A
5893863 Yoon Apr 1999 A
5893875 O'Connor et al. Apr 1999 A
5893877 Gampp, Jr. et al. Apr 1999 A
5902301 Olig May 1999 A
5906630 Anderhub et al. May 1999 A
5908420 Parins et al. Jun 1999 A
5911719 Eggers Jun 1999 A
5913874 Berns et al. Jun 1999 A
5921916 Aeikens et al. Jul 1999 A
5921984 Sutcu et al. Jul 1999 A
5925043 Kumar et al. Jul 1999 A
5935126 Riza Aug 1999 A
5944718 Austin et al. Aug 1999 A
5951549 Richardson et al. Sep 1999 A
5954720 Wilson et al. Sep 1999 A
5957923 Hahnen et al. Sep 1999 A
5961514 Long et al. Oct 1999 A
5976132 Morris Nov 1999 A
5984939 Yoon Nov 1999 A
5989277 LeMaire, III et al. Nov 1999 A
6004335 Vaitekunas et al. Dec 1999 A
6010516 Hulka et al. Jan 2000 A
6024741 Willaimson et al. Feb 2000 A
6024744 Kese et al. Feb 2000 A
6033399 Gines Mar 2000 A
6039733 Buysse et al. Mar 2000 A
6041679 Slater et al. Mar 2000 A
6050996 Schmaltz et al. Apr 2000 A
6053914 Eggers et al. Apr 2000 A
6053933 Balazs et al. Apr 2000 A
D424694 Tetzlaff et al. May 2000 S
D425201 Tetzlaff et al. May 2000 S
6059782 Novak et al. May 2000 A
RE36795 Rydell Jul 2000 E
6083223 Baker Jul 2000 A
6086586 Hooven Jul 2000 A
6090107 Borgmeier et al. Jul 2000 A
6096031 Mitchell et al. Aug 2000 A
6096037 Mulier et al. Aug 2000 A
6099550 Yoon Aug 2000 A
6102909 Chen et al. Aug 2000 A
6110171 Rydell Aug 2000 A
6113596 Hooven et al. Sep 2000 A
6113598 Baker Sep 2000 A
6117158 Measamer et al. Sep 2000 A
6123701 Nezhat Sep 2000 A
H1904 Yates et al. Oct 2000 H
6126658 Baker Oct 2000 A
6152923 Ryan Nov 2000 A
6174309 Wrublewski et al. Jan 2001 B1
6179834 Buysse et al. Jan 2001 B1
6179837 Hooven Jan 2001 B1
6183467 Shapeton et al. Feb 2001 B1
6187003 Buysse et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190386 Rydell Feb 2001 B1
6193718 Kortenbach et al. Feb 2001 B1
6206876 Levine et al. Mar 2001 B1
6206877 Kese et al. Mar 2001 B1
6217602 Redmon Apr 2001 B1
6224593 Ryan et al. May 2001 B1
6228080 Gines May 2001 B1
6228083 Lands et al. May 2001 B1
6267761 Ryan Jul 2001 B1
6270497 Sekino et al. Aug 2001 B1
6270508 Klieman et al. Aug 2001 B1
6273887 Yamauchi et al. Aug 2001 B1
6277117 Tetzlaff et al. Aug 2001 B1
6280458 Boche et al. Aug 2001 B1
6283961 Underwood et al. Sep 2001 B1
D449886 Tetzlaff et al. Oct 2001 S
6322561 Eggers et al. Nov 2001 B1
6334860 Dorn Jan 2002 B1
6334861 Chandler et al. Jan 2002 B1
6350264 Hooven Feb 2002 B1
6352536 Buysse et al. Mar 2002 B1
D457958 Dycus et al. May 2002 S
D457959 Tetzlaff et al. May 2002 S
6387094 Eitenmuller May 2002 B1
6398779 Buysse et al. Jun 2002 B1
6402747 Lindemann et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409728 Ehr et al. Jun 2002 B1
H2037 Yates et al. Jul 2002 H
6425896 Baltschun et al. Jul 2002 B1
6443952 Mulier et al. Sep 2002 B1
6443970 Schulze et al. Sep 2002 B1
6451018 Lands et al. Sep 2002 B1
6458128 Schulze Oct 2002 B1
6458130 Frazier et al. Oct 2002 B1
6464701 Hooven et al. Oct 2002 B1
6464704 Schmaltz et al. Oct 2002 B2
6503248 Levine Jan 2003 B1
6506189 Rittman, III et al. Jan 2003 B1
6511480 Tetzlaff et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514251 Ni et al. Feb 2003 B1
6544264 Levine et al. Apr 2003 B2
6569162 He May 2003 B2
6620161 Schulze et al. Sep 2003 B2
6652521 Schulze Nov 2003 B2
6656177 Truckai et al. Dec 2003 B2
6669696 Bacher et al. Dec 2003 B2
6685724 Haluck Feb 2004 B1
6733498 Paton et al. May 2004 B2
6770072 Truckai et al. Aug 2004 B1
6773434 Ciarrocca Aug 2004 B2
6776780 Mulier et al. Aug 2004 B2
D496997 Dycus et al. Oct 2004 S
6802843 Truckai et al. Oct 2004 B2
D499181 Dycus et al. Nov 2004 S
6818000 Muller et al. Nov 2004 B2
6860880 Treat et al. Mar 2005 B2
6926716 Baker et al. Aug 2005 B2
6929644 Truckai et al. Aug 2005 B2
6932810 Ryan Aug 2005 B2
6942662 Goble et al. Sep 2005 B2
6964662 Kidooka Nov 2005 B2
7033354 Keppel Apr 2006 B2
7083618 Couture et al. Aug 2006 B2
7090673 Dycus et al. Aug 2006 B2
7101371 Dycus et al. Sep 2006 B2
7101372 Dycus et al. Sep 2006 B2
7101373 Dycus et al. Sep 2006 B2
7103947 Sartor et al. Sep 2006 B2
7118570 Tetzlaff et al. Oct 2006 B2
7118587 Dycus et al. Oct 2006 B2
20020013583 Camran et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020099372 Schulze et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020107517 Witt et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020111624 Witt et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030018331 Dycus et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030069571 Treat et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030078578 Truckai Csaba et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030139741 Goble et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030139742 Wampler et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030158549 Swanson Aug 2003 A1
20030199869 Johnson et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030216732 Truckai et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030220637 Csaba Truckai et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030236325 Bonora Dec 2003 A1
20040030330 Brassell et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040030332 Knowlton et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040049185 Latterell et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040116979 Truckai et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040147925 Buysse et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040225288 Buysse et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040230189 Keppel Nov 2004 A1
20040236325 Tetzlaff et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040243125 Dycus et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040249371 Dycus et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040249374 Tetzlaff et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040250419 Sremcich et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254573 Dycus et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004564 Wham et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050004568 Lawes et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050004570 Chapman et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021025 Buysse et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021026 Baily Jan 2005 A1
20050021027 Shields et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050033278 McClurken et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050101951 Wham et al. May 2005 A1
20050101952 Lands et al. May 2005 A1
20050107784 Moses et al. May 2005 A1
20050107785 Dycus et al. May 2005 A1
20050113818 Sartor et al. May 2005 A1
20050113819 Wham et al. May 2005 A1
20050113826 Johnson et al. May 2005 A1
20050113827 Dumbauld et al. May 2005 A1
20050113828 Shields et al. May 2005 A1
20050119655 Moses et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149151 Orszulak et al. Jul 2005 A1
20060064085 Schechter et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060079891 Arts et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060129146 Dycus et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060161150 Keppel Jul 2006 A1
20060167450 Johnson et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060167452 Moses et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173452 Buysse et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060189980 Johnson et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060189981 Dycus et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190035 Hushka et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060217709 Couture et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060224158 Odom et al. Oct 2006 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (103)
Number Date Country
2104423 Feb 1994 CA
2415263 Oct 1975 DE
8712328 Mar 1988 DE
29616210 Jan 1997 DE
19608716 Apr 1997 DE
19751108 May 1999 DE
0364216 Apr 1990 EP
518230 Dec 1992 EP
0 541 930 May 1993 EP
0572131 Dec 1993 EP
584787 Mar 1994 EP
0623316 Nov 1994 EP
0624348 Nov 1994 EP
0650701 May 1995 EP
0694290 Mar 1996 EP
0717966 Jun 1996 EP
0754437 Mar 1997 EP
853922 Jul 1998 EP
0875209 Nov 1998 EP
0878169 Nov 1998 EP
0887046 Jan 1999 EP
0923907 Jun 1999 EP
0986990 Mar 2000 EP
1034747 Sep 2000 EP
1034748 Sep 2000 EP
1025807 Oct 2000 EP
1034746 Oct 2000 EP
1050278 Nov 2000 EP
1053719 Nov 2000 EP
1053720 Nov 2000 EP
1055399 Nov 2000 EP
1055400 Nov 2000 EP
1080694 Mar 2001 EP
1082944 Mar 2001 EP
1159926 Dec 2001 EP
1330991 Jul 2003 EP
1486177 Jun 2004 EP
1532932 May 2005 EP
2214430 Jun 1989 GB
501068 Sep 1984 JP
502328 Mar 1992 JP
5-40112 Feb 1993 JP
06343644 Dec 1994 JP
07265328 Oct 1995 JP
08056955 Mar 1996 JP
08252263 Oct 1996 JP
09010223 Jan 1997 JP
11244298 Sep 1999 JP
2000350732 Dec 2000 JP
2001008944 Jan 2001 JP
2001029356 Feb 2001 JP
2001128990 May 2001 JP
2000342599 Dec 2002 JP
401367 Nov 1974 SU
WO 9206642 Apr 1992 WO
WO 9408524 Apr 1994 WO
WO 9502369 Jan 1995 WO
WO 9507662 Mar 1995 WO
WO 96022056 Jul 1996 WO
WO 9613218 Sep 1996 WO
WO 9700646 Jan 1997 WO
WO 9700647 Jan 1997 WO
WO 9710764 Mar 1997 WO
WO 9724073 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9724993 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9827880 Jul 1998 WO
WO 9903407 Jan 1999 WO
WO 9903408 Jan 1999 WO
WO 9903409 Jan 1999 WO
WO 9912488 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9940857 Aug 1999 WO
WO 99040861 Aug 1999 WO
WO 9951158 Oct 1999 WO
WO 99066850 Dec 1999 WO
WO 9966850 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0024330 May 2000 WO
WO 0024331 May 2000 WO
WO 0041638 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0053112 Sep 2000 WO
WO 0117448 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0154604 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0207627 Jan 2002 WO
WO 02080783 Oct 2002 WO
WO 02080784 Oct 2002 WO
WO 02080785 Oct 2002 WO
WO 02080786 Oct 2002 WO
WO 02080793 Oct 2002 WO
WO 02080794 Oct 2002 WO
WO 02080795 Oct 2002 WO
WO 02080796 Oct 2002 WO
WO 02080796 Oct 2002 WO
WO 02080797 Oct 2002 WO
WO 02080798 Oct 2002 WO
WO 02080799 Oct 2002 WO
WO 02081170 Oct 2002 WO
WO 03101311 Dec 2003 WO
WO 2004032777 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004052221 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004073490 Sep 2004 WO
WO 2004082495 Sep 2004 WO
WO 2004082495 Sep 2004 WO
WO 2004098383 Nov 2004 WO
WO 2004103156 Dec 2004 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20040147925 A1 Jul 2004 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 10113745 Apr 2002 US
Child 10736180 US
Parent 09502933 Feb 2000 US
Child 10090081 US
Parent 08968779 Nov 1997 US
Child 09502933 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10090081 Mar 2002 US
Child 10113745 US