Bisdithiocarbamate fungicide stabilization

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20080085934
  • Publication Number
    20080085934
  • Date Filed
    October 04, 2007
    16 years ago
  • Date Published
    April 10, 2008
    16 years ago
Abstract
A composition comprising at least one bisdithiocarbamate fungicide and at least one zinc additive is provided. Processes related thereto are also provided.
Description
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Bisdithiocarbamates are known as multi-site fungicides. Several examples exist and are commercially used to protect plants from fungi. Suitable examples are:


ferbam (CAS#14484-64-1);


mancopper (CAS#53988-93-5);


mancozeb (CAS#8018-01-7);


maneb (CAS#1247-38-2);


metiram (CAS#9006-42-2);


nabam (CAS#142-59-6);


propineb (CAS#12071-83-9);


thiram (CAS#137-26-8);


zineb (CAS#12122-67-7); and


ziram (CAS#137-30-4).


In another embodiment alkylenebisdithiocarbamates work well with the zinc additives disclosed herein. In another embodiment, ethylenebis-dithiocarbamates work well with the zinc additives disclosed herein, because these zinc additives help to prevent the appearance of ethylenethiourea (which is a breakdown product of these ethylenebisdithiocarbamates) during storage, manufacture, or shipping.


The zinc additives are any zinc containing compound that when added to a composition comprising the bisdithiocarbamates, stabilizes the amount of bisdithiocarbamates in such composition, when compared to a control composition that does not contain such zinc additive or may contain a lesser amount of a zinc compound (as for example mancozeb). While not wanting to be bound by theory, it is believed that at least a portion, perhaps a substantial portion, of the zinc additive, during processing, dissociates from the rest of the additive and helps protect the bisdithiocarbamate by forming a protective coating. The following compounds are useful as zinc additives.
















Zinc Additives Table
CAS #









Zinc acetate
557-34-6



Zinc acetylacetonate
108503-47-5



Zinc ammonium nitrite
63885-01-8



Zinc bromide
7699-45-8



Zinc butylxanthate
150-88-9



Zinc carbonate
3486-35-9



Zinc citrate
5990-32-9



Zinc chloride
7646-85-7



Zinc ethylsulfate
5970-49-0



Zinc fluorosilicate
16871-71-9



Zinc formate
557-41-5



Zinc gluconate
4468-02-4



Zinc hydrosulfite
7779-86-4



Zinc hydroxide
20427-58-1



Zinc hypophosphite
15060-64-7



Zinc iodide
10139-47-6



Zinc lactate D/L forms
16039-53-5



Zinc malate
2847-05-4



Zinc molybdate
13767-32-3



Zinc nitrate
7779-88-6



Zinc oxalate
547-68-2



Zinc oxide
1314-13-2



Zinc phosphate
7779-90-9



Zinc propionate
557-28-8



Zinc pyrophosphate
7446-26-6



Zinc salicylate
16283-36-6



Zinc silicate
13597-65-4



Zinc sulfate
7733-02-0



Zinc sulfite
7488-52-0



Zinc thiocyanate
557-42-6










The amount of zinc additive to use with these bisdithiocarbamates is given in Table 1.











TABLE 1









Approximate Weight Percent



(based on total weight of these components)










Component
Broad Range
Broader Range
Broadest Range





bisdithiocarbamate
about 90-97%
about 85-98%
about 80-99%


Zinc additive
about 10-3%
about 15-2%
about 20-1%









The zinc additive and the bisdithiocarbamates can be mixed together in any conventional manner known in the art. Once mixed together the amount of bisdithiocarbamate in the mixture will be more stable than a control composition not containing any zinc additive. It is also envisioned that these zinc additives can be used with hexamethylenetetramine in order to more fully stabilize the amount of bisdithiocarbamate in the composition. Additionally, this could entail being able to use less hexamethylenetetramine than is usually required in order to obtain the same effect as using hexamethylenetetramine only. In this embodiment, the amount of hexamethylenetetramine and the amount of zinc additive to use can vary in accordance with the total amount of zinc additive given in Table 1.


The stabilized bisdithiocarbamates can be used in any manner that is known in the art as in the practices long used with other bisdithiocarbamates not stabilized in the manner of this invention. In particular these stabilized bisdithiocarbamates can be applied to a locus to protect plants from fungi. While these stabilized bisdithiocarbamates can be applied after fungi have attacked plants of concern, this is not currently the most preferred method of protecting plants. The amount of bisdithiocarbamate to apply is a fungicidally effective amount. In most cases this means an amount sufficient to protect the plants of concern from significant harm. Usually this means applying an amount that kills or inhibits the fungi, but that is not significantly toxic to the plant. The exact amount to use varies with the fungal disease to be controlled, the type of formulation employed, the method of application, the particular plant species, climate conditions, and the like. A suitable application rate is typically in the range from about 0.1 to about 4 pounds/acre (about 0.1 to 0.45 grams per square meter).


EXAMPLE

This example is provided to further illustrate this invention. It is not meant to limit the scope of the invention.


The sample preparation and stability screening was done on a very small scale (ca. 100 mg of mancozeb) in 96 well microtitre plates using semi-automated, high throughput screening (HTS) methodology that is well known in the art. While this method of sample preparation is not identical to the actual process for manufacturing mancozeb, it serves as a useful method for identifying new compositions that can provide storage stability for mancozeb.


General sample preparation procedure: All sample preparation operations were conducted in an inert atmosphere to minimize oxidative degradation by oxygen. Efficient elimination of oxygen in the sample preparation and analytical portions of this mancozeb stability screen is critical to achieving reproducible results. The following is a typical sample preparation: Maneb (61.5 parts; used as 60 wt % wet cake with the remainder water), dispersant (sodium lignosulfonate; 1 part), zinc sulfate heptahydrate (2.5 parts), and water (35 parts) were combined under nitrogen and mixed for ten minutes using a Siemens Speedmixer (dual-axis) at ˜2200 rpm in 5-minute increments to prevent sample heating. The paste formed was then added (250 μL) under nitrogen to 1-mL vials contained HMT stabilizer in water (5%), such that the final wt % HMT in the mancozeb was 0.9% (dry basis; ca. 100 mg sample size). The zinc level in this sample was 3.4% (dry basis). After thorough mixing to blend the HMT with the paste (3-4 minutes using Vortex mixing and 5-10 minutes on a paint shaker), the samples were dried by freeze-drying them overnight @−40° C. (ca. 60 mm Hg). Alternatively, centrifugal heated drying in a Genevac (70° C. with slight vacuum/N2 overnight) could also be used though it was more cumbersome and the results were less reliable. Both methods do not involve any agitation or mixing of the samples as they were dried. Achieving a final water level of ca. 1% or less in the samples was desired. Typically, 5 replications of each composition were prepared and tested at a time.


Ageing of samples: The dry samples (open to the atmosphere) were then placed in a 50° C. air vented oven for two weeks to simulate accelerated ageing on storage and were than cooled to rt.


Analysis for ETU: The estimate of mancozeb stability is based on the formation of the oxidation by-product ETU (ethylene thiourea) which forms when mancozeb is degraded by exposure to air and moisture. Higher levels of ETU indicate increased degradation of mancozeb. The aged samples were maintained in an inert atmosphere to minimize any further oxidative degradation during analytical processing and were diluted with methanol (1 mL) containing benzophenone standard and mixed thoroughly (˜15 minutes using a combination of a Vortex mixer and a paint shaker) to extract the decomposition product ETU from the solid mancozeb. The extraction solution was separated from the solids via centrifugation (3000 rpm, 20 min) and then transferred by pipette to new vials. These vials were then centrifuged before analysis by gas chromatography (DB-1701 column, isothermal @ 250° C.), in which the ETU signal was integrated with respect to the internal standard (benzophenone). Standard samples of ETU and benzophenone were also analyzed by GC to generate response factors and the linearity of the analysis.


In Table E1, the 2.4% zinc sample contains a similar amount of zinc as does a current commercial product called Dithane® (available from Dow AgroSciences LLC). The other entries show the amount of zinc from mancozeb plus the amount of zinc from the zinc additive. This table clearly shows that adding a zinc additive to the composition greatly lowers the amount of ETU produced which thereby indicates improved stability of the mancozeb (a bisdithiocarbamate).












TABLE E1







Zinc
ETU formed



weight percent
weight percent



















2.4
0.130



3.7
0.069



4.9
0.084



6.1
0.069



7.3
0.033









Claims
  • 1. A composition comprising: (a) at least one bisdithiocarbamate; and(b) at least one zinc additive.
  • 2. A process comprising mixing: (a) at least one bisdithiocarbamate; and(b) at least one zinc additive.
  • 3. A process of protecting plants from fungi, said process comprising applying to a locus a fungicidally effective amount of a composition according to claim 1.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/849,408, filed on Oct. 4, 2006, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated by reference herein.

Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60849408 Oct 2006 US