Bispecific EGFR/IGFIR binding molecules

Abstract
The present invention relates to bispecific molecules comprising an EGFR binding domain and a distinct IGFIR binding domain for use in diagnostic, research and therapeutic applications. The invention further relates to cells comprising such proteins, polynucleotide encoding such proteins or fragments thereof, and vectors comprising the polynucleotides encoding the innovative proteins. Exemplary bispecific molecules include antibody-like protein dimers based on the tenth fibronectin type III domain.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to EGFR binding domains and bispecific molecules comprising an EGFR binding domain and a distinct IGFIR binding domain for use in diagnostic, research and therapeutic applications. The invention further relates to cells comprising such proteins, polynucleotide encoding such proteins or fragments thereof, and vectors comprising the polynucleotides encoding the innovative proteins. Exemplary EGFR binding domains and bispecific molecules include antibody-like protein dimers based on the tenth fibronectin type III domain.


INTRODUCTION

Activation of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling is central to cancer development (see e.g., Grimberg A. Cancer Biol Ther. 2003 2(6):630-5 and Mendelsohn J. J Clin Oncol. 2003 21(14):2787-99). Receptor tyrosine kinases have a conserved domain structure including an extracellular domain, a transmembrane domain and an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain. The extracellular domain can bind to a ligand, such as to a polypeptide growth factor or to a cell membrane-associated molecule. Typically, either ligand binding or ligand binding induced dimerization of receptor tyrosine kinases activates the intracellular catalytic tyrosine kinase domain of the receptor and subsequent signal transduction.


Examples of receptor tyrosine kinases include, but are not limited to ERBB receptors (e.g., EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB3, ERBB4), erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular (EPH) receptors, fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors (e.g., FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3, FGFR4, FGFR5), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptors (e.g., PDGFR-A, PDGFR-B), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors (e.g., VEGFR1/FLT1, VEGFR2/FLK1, VEGF3), tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin-like and EGF-like domains (TIE) receptors, insulin-like growth factor (IGF) receptors (e.g., INS-R, IGFIR, IR-R), Discoidin Domain (DD) receptors, receptor for c-Met (MET), recepteur d′ origine nantais (RON); also known as macrophage stimulating 1 receptor, Flt3 fins-related tyrosine kinase 3 (Flt3), colony stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) receptor, adhesion related kinase receptor (e.g., Ax1), receptor for c-kit (KIT) and insulin receptor related (IRR) receptors.


Inhibition of receptor tyrosine kinases has emerged as an effective treatment strategy for certain human malignancies (for a review see Roussidis A E, In Vivo. 2002 16(6):459-69). While targeted monotherapy may initially be effective in treating cancer, therapeutic resistance often follows, possibly as a result of upregulation of other signaling cascades (see e.g., Nahta R et al., Breast Cancer Res. 2006 8(6):215 and Horn L et al., Clin Lung Cancer. 2007 8:S68-73). Accordingly, there exists a need for developing improved cancer therapeutics.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one aspect, the application provides EGFR binding tenth fibronectin type III domains (10Fn3) having novel sequences. EGFR binding 10Fn3 having a consensus sequence are also provided. Such EGFR binding 10Fn3 may be monomeric or may be included as part of a fusion protein.


In another aspect, the application provides bispecific molecules that bind EGFR and IGFIR, referred to herein as “E/I binders”. E/I binders encompassed by the invention include bispecific antibodies and dimers of ligand binding scaffold proteins (e.g., tendamistat, affibody, fibronectin type III domain, anticalin, tetranectin, and ankyrin). When constructed as a single polypeptide chain, the E/I binders may be constructed in any orientation, e.g., from N-terminus to C-terminus either in the E-I arrangement or the I-E arrangement.


In one aspect, antibody-like protein dimers are provided comprising an EGFR binding 10Fn3 covalently or non-covalently linked to an IGFIR binding 10Fn3. The 10Fn3 bind their target (EGFR or IGFIR) with a KD of less than 500 nM. Each of the individual 10Fn3 independently has an amino acid sequence at least 70, 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 32, wherein n is an integer from 1-20, o is an integer from 1-20, and p is an integer from 1-40. In some embodiments, n is an integer from 8-12, o is an integer from 4-8, and p is an integer from 4-28. In some embodiments, n is 10, o is 6, and p is 12.


In some embodiments, the antibody-like protein dimers comprise IGFIR binding 10Fn3 covalently linked to EGFR binding 10Fn3 via a polypeptide linker or a polyethylene glycol moiety. In some embodiments, the antibody-like protein dimer comprises an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, or 100% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 20-31, 53-58, 87-92, 98-105, 118-133, 149-154, 164-169, 179-184, 192-197, 205-210 and 211-216.


In some embodiments, the E/I binder comprises an amino acid sequence having any one of SEQ ID NOs: 20-31, 53-58, 87-92, 98-105, 118-133, 149-154, 164-169, 179-184, 192-197, 205-210 and 211-216, wherein (i) the EGFR binding 10Fn3 and/or the IGF-IR binding 10Fn3 comprises a 10Fn3 scaffold having from has anywhere from 0 to 20, from 0 to 15, from 0 to 10, from 0 to 8, from 0 to 6, from 0 to 5, from 0 to 4, from 0 to 3, from 0 to 2, or from 0 to 1 substitutions, conservative substitutions, deletions or additions relative to the corresponding scaffold amino acids of SEQ ID NO: 1, and/or (ii) the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has anywhere from 0 to 15, from 0 to 10, from 0 to 8, from 0 to 6, from 0 to 5, from 0 to 4, from 0 to 3, from 0 to 2, or from 0 to 1 substitutions, conservative substitutions, deletions or additions relative to the corresponding loop sequences of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 5-8, 52, 66-68, 106-108, 112-114, 140-142, 155-157, 170-172, 182, 185-187, 198-200, or 219-327 and/or the IGF-IR binding 10Fn3 has anywhere from 0 to 15, from 0 to 10, from 0 to 8, from 0 to 6, from 0 to 5, from 0 to 4, from 0 to 3, from 0 to 2, or from 0 to 1 substitutions, conservative substitutions, deletions or additions relative to the corresponding loop sequences of SEQ ID NO: 3.


In one aspect, pharmaceutically acceptable compositions are provided comprising an antibody-like protein dimer as described herein and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, wherein the composition is essentially pyrogen free.


In a further aspect, methods for treating hyperproliferative disorders, such as cancer, in a subject are provided comprising administering to a subject in need thereof a therapeutically effective amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable composition comprising an antibody-like protein dimer as described herein.


In another aspect, the application provides a nucleic acid encoding an antibody-like protein dimer as described herein. Also provided is a vector comprising a nucleic acid encoding an antibody-like dimer as described herein. Suitable vectors include, for example, expression vectors. Also provided are host cells comprising a nucleic, vector, or expression vector, comprising a nucleic acid encoding an antibody-like protein dimer as described herein. Suitable host cells include prokaryotic and eukaryotic host cells. Exemplary prokaryotic cells are bacterial cells, such as E. coli. Exemplary eukaryotic cells are mammalian cells, such as CHO cells. Also provided are methods for producing an antibody-like protein dimer as described herein, comprising culturing a host cell comprising a nucleic, vector, or expression vector, comprising a nucleic acid encoding the antibody-like protein dimer and recovering the expressed antibody-like protein dimer from the culture.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1. SDS-PAGE Analysis of I1-GS10-E2. Samples from the lysis of HMS174(DE3) bacterial cell pellet from which I1-GS10-E2 was expressed and purified by a HisTrap chromatography column were run on a 4-12% NuPAGE minigel and stained by Sypro-Orange and visualized by STORM imager. Mark 12 molecular weight standards (Lane 1); Lysate-soluble (Lane 2); Lysate-insoluble (Lane 3); HisTrap load (Lane 4); HisTrap non-bound (Lane 5); Pooled HisTrap Eluate (Lane 6); Dialyzed into 50 mM NaOAc, 150 mM NaCl, pH 4.5 (Lane 7); Dialyzed into PBS (Lane 8); Dialyzed into Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 8.5 (Lane 9).



FIG. 2. A. SEC Analysis of midscale purified I1-GS10-E2. 22 μg of HisTrap purified I1-GS10-E2 dialyzed into PBS, pH 7.4 was loaded onto a Superdex 200 10/30 SEC Column (GE Healthcare) with a mobile phase of 100 mM NaPO4, 100 mM NaSO4, 150 mM NaCl, pH 6.8 and measured using A280. I1-GS10-E2 eluted predominantly as a single monomeric species at a molecular weight range of approximately 24.6 kDa vs. globular Gel Filtration standards (BioRad). B. SEC analysis of E2-GS10-I1.



FIG. 3. A. Differential Scanning calorimetry (DSC) of midscale purified I1-GS10-E2 in PBS was performed to determine the Tm. A 1 mg/mL solution of I1-GS10-E2 was scanned from 5° C. to 95° C. at a rate of 1 degree per minute under 3 atm pressure. The data was analyzed versus a control run of the PBS buffer. B. DSC of E2-GS10-I1.



FIG. 4. Inhibition of IGFR activity in H292 cells. Cells were stimulated with 100 ng/mL of IGF-1 and 100 ng/mL of EGF and treated with either ●I1, □E1, or ΔE1-GS10-I1 HTPP preparations. Phosphorylation of IGFIR on tyrosine 1131 was determined by ELISA.



FIG. 5. Inhibition of EGFR activity in H292 cells. Cells were stimulated with 100 ng/mL of IGF-1 and 100 ng/mL of EGF and treated with either ●I1, □E1, or ΔE1-GS10-I1 HTPP preparations. Phosphorylation of EGFR on tyrosine 1068 was determined by ELISA.



FIG. 6. Inhibition of AKT phosphorylation in H292 cells. Cells were stimulated with 100 ng/mL of IGF-1 and 100 ng/mL of EGF and treated with either ●I1, □E1, or ΔE1-GS10-I1 HTPP preparations. Phosphorylation of AKT on serine 473 was determined by ELISA.



FIG. 7. Inhibition of RH41 cell proliferation. Cells were treated with either ●I1, □E1, or ΔE1-GS10-I1 HTPP preparations and percent inhibition of proliferation was determined.



FIG. 8. Inhibition of H292 cell proliferation. Cells were treated with either ●I1, □E1, or ΔE1-GS10-I1 HTPP preparations and percent inhibition of proliferation was determined.



FIG. 9. Summarizes IC50 values in cell based functional assays for isolated EGFR mononectins, E/I10 Fn3-based binders with serine at the C-terminal position without PEG added and E/I10 Fn3-based binders with cysteine at the C-terminal position conjugated to a 40 kDa branched PEG. Representative data is shown.



FIG. 10. Immunoblot analysis of PEGylated E/I10 Fn3-based binder with E2 in the N-terminal and C-terminal positions. Despite both constructs demonstrating comparable activity in the H292 cell assay for inhibiting EGFR, the E/I10 Fn3-based binder with E2 at the C-terminal position did not degrade EGFR while the E/I10 Fn3-based binder with E2 at the N-terminal position did. Both constructs show very weak to no IGFR degradation in this cell line. β-actin was included to demonstrate equal loading across all lanes. The phosphorylation state of EGFR, ERK and Shc was also examined.



FIG. 11. Inhibition of EGF-stimulated EGFR phosphorylation in H292 cells. Both constructs demonstrated comparable activity in the H292 cell assay for inhibiting EGFR. E2-GS10-I1 (with PEG) (◯), I1-GS10-E2 (with PEG) (□), panitumumab ( - - - ).



FIG. 12. Results of tumor xenograft studies. FIG. 12A: Preclinical anti-tumor activity in the H292 human tumor xenograft model. Mean tumor sizes calculated from groups of 8 mice is shown in mg for control animals (▪), E3-GS10-I1 (w/PEG) dosed at 100 mg/kg (◯), E2-GS10-I1 (with PEG) dosed at 100 mg/kg (□), panitumumab dosed at 1 mg/mouse (Δ) or 0.1 mg/mouse (∇). The letter a on the x-axis indicates doses of E/I binders administered and the p indicates doses of panitumumab administered. FIG. 12B: Average weight change is shown for each group over the course of the study. Symbols are as described in FIG. 12A legend.



FIG. 13. Pharmacodynamic effects in the H292 NSCLC tumor xenograft model. Levels of the indicated analytes were determined in tumor lysates as described in Example 12. (A) phosph-EGFR, (B) phospho-ErbB2, (C) phospho-IGFR, and (D) total EGFR. Checkered bars=panitumumab, empty bars=E2-GS10-I1 (with PEG), hatched bats=E3-GS10-I1 (with PEG).



FIG. 14. Western blot analysis of MCF7r cells compared to MCF7 parental cells.



FIG. 15. MCF7 (Panel A) and MCF7r (Panel B) human tumor xenograft studies in nude mice. Mean tumor size is shown for both studies calculated from 8 mice per group.



FIG. 16. GEO human tumor xenograft studies in nude mice.



FIG. 17. H292 human tumor xenograft studies in nude mice.



FIG. 18. Colony formation assay with H292 NSCLC cells. A. Representative data is shown from a single plate. B. IC50 from one E/I10 Fn3-based binder is shown with error bars calculated from triplicate measurements.



FIG. 19. Epitope mapping assay. Location of epitope binding for various EGFR binding antibodies are shown in panel A. A description of the antibodies is provided in Example 18, Table 11. The left column of table 11 provides a number for each anti-EGFR antibody which correlates with the numbered antibodies shown in panel A. Panel B shows an exemplary epitope mapping assay as described in Example 18.



FIG. 20. DSC analysis of the E/I10 Fn3-based binder, I1-GS10-E5 pegylated, measured with a scan range of 15-95° C. at 1 mg/ml protein concentration in PBS, resulted in a Tm measurement of 55.2° C.



FIG. 21. Evaluation of E/I10 Fn3-based binders for inhibition of AKT phosphorylation in H292 cells as measured by ELISA. I1-GS10-E5-pegylated (◯) was more potent than I1-pegylated alone (▪) or E5-pegylated alone (▴) for blocking IGF1-stimulated AKT phosphorylation.



FIG. 22. Evaluation of E/I10 Fn3-based binders for inhibition of cell proliferation in H292 cells. I1-GS10-E5-pegylated (□) was more potent than I1-pegylated alone (▴) and E5-pegylated alone (●) had only weak effects for inhibiting the growth of H292 cells. Assays were carried out in triplicate. Representative data is shown.



FIG. 23. Evaluation of E/I10 Fn3-based binders for inhibition of cell proliferation in RH41 cells. I1-GS10-E5-pegylated (□) was slightly more potent than I1-pegylated alone (▴) and E5-pegylated alone (●) or panitumumab (dashed line) had almost no effect for inhibiting the growth of RH41 cells. Assays were carried out in triplicate. Representative data is shown.



FIG. 24. Inhibition of ligand stimulated signaling by 10Fn3-based binders (pegylated). Effect of E/I10 Fn3-based binder (I1-GS10-E5 pegylated) on receptor activation and cell signaling in DiFi (Panel A), H292 (Panel B) or BxPC3 (Panel C) cells. Cells were serum starved and treated for 2 hours with 1 μM 10Fn3-based binders before stimulation with either EGF, IGF1 or a combination of EGF+IGF1. GAPDH was probed to illustrate equal loading in all lanes.



FIG. 25. Inhibition of ligand stimulated signaling in H292 cells by 10Fn3-based binders (unpegylated). Effect of E/I10 Fn3-based binder (E2-GS10-I1) on receptor activation and cell signaling in H292 cells. Cells were serum starved and treated for 2 hours with 1 μm 10Fn3-based binders before stimulation with either EGF, IGF1 or a combination of EGF+IGF1. GAPDH was probed to illustrate equal loading in all lanes



FIG. 26. Competition binding studies with E/I10 Fn3-based binders. A. The EGFR 10Fn3-based binder does not compete for binding of EGFR antibodies to EGFR. Initial injection of the EGFR 10Fn3-based binder shows binding to EGFR on the surface of the chip. A second injection of EGFR 10Fn3-based binder mixed with an equal amount of cetuximab, panitumumab, or nimotuzumab shows no competition for binding of antibodies to EGFR by the EGFR 10Fn3-based binder. B. The E/I 10Fn3-based binder can bind EGFR and IGF-IR simultaneously. Initial injection of the E/I 10Fn3-based binder shows binding to EGFR immobilized on the chip surface. A second injection of the E/I 10Fn3-based binder soluble IGF-IR shows binding of sIGF-IR to other end of the immobilized E/I 10Fn3-based binder.



FIG. 27. TGFα plasma levels 4 hours after last dose of xenograft studies. Plasma samples taken at the end of treatment from the BxPC3 (Panel A), GEO (Panel B) and H441 (Panel C) xenograft studies described in Table 24 were analyzed for circulating levels of TGFα.



FIG. 28. TGFα and IGF1 plasma levels in non tumor bearing nude mice after dosing with I1-GS10-E5 pegylated. Non-tumor bearing mice were given a single dose of I1-GS10-E5 pegylated 10Fn3-based binder and analyzed for circulating levels of TGFα (Panel A) and IGF1 (Panel B).



FIG. 29. H292 xenograft study using E/110Fn3-based binders as compared to panitumumab. H292 xenografts were either untreated (▪) or dosed three times a week with 10Fn3-based binders formulated in PBS with the individual constructs as described in the figure or dosed every three days i.p. with panitumumab at 1 mg/mouse (◯) or 0.1 mg/mouse (□). Actual doses of 10Fn3-based binders and panitumumab (▴) are indicated on the x-axis with the panitumumab doses closest to the x-axis below the triangles indicating doses of 10Fn3-based binders. FIG. 29A shows measurements out to day 43. FIG. 29B shows measurements out to day 27.



FIG. 30. Pharmaokinectic parameters profile of E2-GS10-I1 pegylated in mice.



FIG. 31. Comparison of half-life at 100 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg IP, and 10 mg/kg and 64 mg/kg SC in various E/I 10Fn3-based binders.



FIG. 32. Antitumor efficacy of E2-GS10-I1 pegylated in the RH41 model.



FIG. 33. Measurement of pharmacodynamic endpoints in tumors. At the end of treatment, tumors were removed 4 hours following the final dose from DiFi xenograft model (panel A) and H292 xenograft model (panel B) and examined for levels of phospho-EGFR, phospho-IGFR, total EGFR and total IGFR. Equal amounts of total protein lysate was loaded into each lane of the gels and blots were also probed with GAPDH to demonstrate equal loading across all lanes.



FIG. 34. Sequence of anti-EGFR binder 679F09 (SEQ ID NO: 490). Loop residues which were varied are underlined.



FIG. 35. BC loop Sequence Analysis I. Frequency of amino acids at each position in the BC loop from EGFR binding sequences. Image created using WebLogo (Crooks G E, Hon G, Chandonia J M, Brenner S E. WebLogo: A sequence logo generator. Genome Research, 14:1188-1190, 2004).



FIG. 36. DE loop Sequence Analysis 1. Frequency of amino acids at each position in the DE loop from EGFR binding sequences (263 unique DE loop sequences analyzed).



FIG. 37. FG loop (10-aa length) Sequence Analysis I. Frequency of amino acids at each position in the FG loop from EGFR binding sequences with 10-amino acid long FG loops (228 unique 10-amino acid long FG loops analyzed).



FIG. 38. FG loop (15-aa length) Sequence Analysis I. Frequency of amino acids at each position in the FG loop from EGFR binding sequences with 15-amino acid long FG loops (349 unique 15-amino acid long FG loops analyzed).



FIG. 39. BC loop Sequence Analysis II. Frequency of amino acids at each position in the BC loop from all “potent” sequences (85 unique BC loop sequences analyzed).



FIG. 40. DE loop Sequence Analysis II. Frequency of amino acids at each position in the DE loop from all “potent” sequences (60 unique DE loop sequences analyzed).



FIG. 41. FG loop (10-aa length) Sequence Analysis II. Frequency of amino acids at each position in the FG loop from all “potent” sequences with 10-amino acid long FG loops (6 unique 10-amino acid long FG loops analyzed).



FIG. 42. FG loop (15-aa length) Sequence Analysis II. Frequency of amino acids at each position in the FG loop from all “potent” sequences with 15-amino acid long FG loops (65 unique 15-amino acid long FG loops analyzed).



FIG. 43. Table summarizing various characteristics of E/I 10Fn3-based binders as described in Example 22.



FIG. 44. Table summarizing various pharmacokinetic parameters of E/I 10Fn3-based binders as described in Example 30.



FIGS. 45A-H. Amino acid sequences of E monomers as described in Example 32. The BC, DE and FG loops in each sequence are underlined.



FIG. 46. Alignment of wild-type core sequence (amino acids 9-94 of SEQ ID NO: 1) with I1 core (SEQ ID NO:65), E1 core (SEQ ID NO:66), E2 core (SEQ ID NO:67), E3 core (SEQ ID NO:68), E4 core (SEQ ID NO:108), E5 core (SEQ ID NO:114), E85 core (SEQ ID NO:141), E90 core (SEQ ID NO:156), E96 core (SEQ ID NO:171), E105 core (SEQ ID NO:186), and E112 core (SEQ ID NO:199). The BC, DE and FG loops in the wild-type sequences are shown in bold and underlined. The amino acid residues actually changed in comparison to wild-type for the I and E cores are shown i bold and underlined.



FIGS. 47A-Q. Nucleic acid sequences of E and I monomers. Unless otherwise specified, the nucleotide sequences encode a monomer having an N+10 N-terminal extension, a Ser tail, and a His tag.



FIGS. 48A-G. Nucleic acid sequence of E/I 10Fn3-based binders. All nucleotide sequences encode an E/I 10Fn3-based binder having an N+10 N-terminal extension on the first monomer in the construct and a Cys tail and His tag on the second monomer in the construct. GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11; GSGCGS8 is SEQ ID NO: 218; and GSGC is SEQ ID NO: 489.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Definitions

As used herein, the following terms and phrases shall have the meanings set forth below. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood to one of ordinary skill in the art.


The singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.


The terms “comprise” and “comprising” are used in the inclusive, open sense, meaning that additional elements may be included.


The term “including” is used to mean “including but not limited to”. “Including” and “including but not limited to” are used interchangeably.


The term “antibody-like protein” refers to a non-immunoglobulin protein having an “immunoglobulin-like fold”, i.e., comprises about 80-150 amino acid residues that are structurally organized into a set of beta or beta-like strands, forming beta sheets, where the beta or beta-like strands are connected by intervening loop portions. The beta sheets form the stable core of the antibody-like protein, while creating two “faces” composed of the loops that connect the beta or beta-like strands. As described herein, these loops can be varied to create customized ligand binding sites, and such variations can be generated without disrupting the overall stability of the protein. An example of such an antibody-like protein is a “fibronectin-based scaffold protein”, by which is meant a polypeptide based on a fibronectin type III domain (Fn3). In one aspect, an antibody-like protein is based on a tenth fibronectin type III domain (10Fn3).


By a “polypeptide” is meant any sequence of two or more amino acids, regardless of length, post-translation modification, or function. “Polypeptide,” “peptide,” and “protein” are used interchangeably herein.


“Percent (%) amino acid sequence identity” herein is defined as the percentage of amino acid residues in a candidate sequence that are identical with the amino acid residues in a selected sequence, after aligning the sequences and introducing gaps, if necessary, to achieve the maximum percent sequence identity, and not considering any conservative substitutions as part of the sequence identity. Alignment for purposes of determining percent amino acid sequence identity can be achieved in various ways that are within the skill in the art, for instance, using publicly available computer software such as BLAST, BLAST-2, ALIGN, ALIGN-2 or Megalign (DNASTAR) software. Those skilled in the art can determine appropriate parameters for measuring alignment, including any algorithms needed to achieve maximal alignment over the full-length of the sequences being compared. For purposes herein, however, % amino acid sequence identity values are obtained as described below by using the sequence comparison computer program ALIGN-2. The ALIGN-2 sequence comparison computer program was authored by Genentech, Inc. has been filed with user documentation in the U.S. Copyright Office, Washington D.C., 20559, where it is registered under U.S. Copyright Registration No. TXU510087, and is publicly available through Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, Calif. The ALIGN-2 program should be compiled for use on a UNIX operating system, preferably digital UNIX V4.0D. All sequence comparison parameters are set by the ALIGN-2 program and do not vary.


For purposes herein, the % amino acid sequence identity of a given amino acid sequence A to, with, or against a given amino acid sequence B (which can alternatively be phrased as a given amino acid sequence A that has or comprises a certain % amino acid sequence identity to, with, or against a given amino acid sequence B) is calculated as follows: 100 times the fraction X/Y where X is the number of amino acid residues scored as identical matches by the sequence alignment program ALIGN-2 in that program's alignment of A and B, and where Y is the total number of amino acid residues in B. It will be appreciated that where the length of amino acid sequence A is not equal to the length of amino acid sequence B, the % amino acid sequence identity of A to B will not equal the % amino acid sequence identity of B to A.


The term “therapeutically effective amount” refers to an amount of a drug effective to treat a disease or disorder in a mammal. In the case of cancer, the therapeutically effective amount of the drug may reduce the number of cancer cells; reduce the tumor size; inhibit (i.e., slow to some extent and preferably stop) cancer cell infiltration into peripheral organs; inhibit (i.e., slow to some extent and preferably stop) tumor metastasis; inhibit, to some extent, tumor growth; and/or relieve to some extent one or more of the symptoms associated with the disorder. To the extent the drug may prevent growth and/or kill existing cancer cells, it may be cytostatic and/or cytotoxic. For cancer therapy, efficacy in vivo can, for example, be measured by assessing the time to disease progression (TTP) and/or determining the response rates (RR).


The half-life of an amino acid sequence or compound can generally be defined as the time taken for the serum concentration of the polypeptide to be reduced by 50% in vivo due to, e.g., degradation of the sequence or compound and/or clearance or sequestration of the sequence or compound by natural mechanisms. The half-life can be determined in any manner known in the art, such as by pharmacokinetic analysis. See e.g., M Gibaldi & D Perron “Pharmacokinetics”, published by Marcel Dekker, 2nd Rev. edition (1982).


The term “E/I binder” refers to a bispecific molecule that comprises an EGFR binding domain and a distinct IGFIR binding domain. The two domains may be covalently or non-covalently linked. An exemplary E/I binder is an antibody-like dimer comprising an EGFR binding 10Fn3 and an IGFIR binding 10Fn3, i.e., an E/I 10Fn3 based binder.


Overview


The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and insulin-like growth factor receptor (IFGR) play key roles in the tumorigenesis of several types of human cancer. Inhibition of either receptor effectively reduces tumor growth in preclinical models as well as clinically. Blocking the EGFR pathway induces switching to the IGFR pathway to drive growth with in vitro tumor models. Therefore, blocking both receptors simultaneously may achieve superior efficacy to blocking either pathway alone by overcoming pathway switching. In exemplary embodiments, the activity of an E/I binder is synergistic in comparison to the monomeric components of the E/I binder.


The specification describes, inter alia, bispecific molecules that bind EGFR and IGFIR, referred to herein as “E/I binders”. Applicants have discovered that such bispecific molecules inhibit proliferation of a cancer model cell line with greater potency than the corresponding. monospecific binders (see e.g., Example 9 and FIG. 8).


E/I binders will be useful in numerous therapeutic applications, especially in the treatment of cancer. In addition to therapeutic applications, E/I binders may be used in any circumstance where it is desirable to detect EGFR and/or IGFIR.


E/I binders have an EGFR binding domain and a distinct IGFIR binding domain. Typical binding domains include antibodies; therefore, bispecific antibodies may be generated to function as E/I binders. Bispecific antibodies comprising complementary pairs of VH and VL regions are known in the art. These bispecific antibodies comprise two pairs of VH and VL, each VH/L pair binding to a single antigen. (see e.g., Hu et al., Cancer Res. 1996 56:3055-306; Neri et al., J. Mol. Biol. 1995 246:367-373; Atwell et al., Mol. Immunol. 1996 33:1301-1312; and Carter et al., Protein Sci. 1997 6:781-788). An exemplary bispecific antibody is a diabody, i.e., a small antibody fragment with two antigen-binding sites, which fragments comprise a heavy-chain variable domain connected to a light-chain variable domain in the same polypeptide chain (Hollinger et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993 90: 6444-6448).


E/I binders also encompass dimers of ligand binding scaffold proteins. Scaffold proteins are well described in the literature and include, e.g., tendamistat, affibody, fibroncectin type III domain, anticalin, tetranectin, and ankyrin. Additional scaffold proteins that may be used to generate E/I binders are reviewed in Binz et al., Nature Biotech 23:1257-1268 (2005). Scaffold proteins are based on a rigid core structure or ‘framework’ that is important in determining and stabilizing the three-dimensional structure. In between the fixed or conserved residues of the scaffold lie variable regions such as loops, surfaces or cavities that can be randomized to alter ligand binding. A large diversity of amino acids is provided in the variable regions between the fixed scaffold residues to provide specific binding to a target molecule.


An exemplary ligand binding scaffold protein is based on a fibronectin type III domain (Fn3). Fibronectin is a large protein which plays essential roles in the formation of extracellular matrix and cell-cell interactions; it consists of many repeats of three types (types I, II, and III) of small domains.


Fn3 is small, monomeric, soluble, and stable. It lacks disulfide bonds and, therefore, is stable under reducing conditions. The overall structure of Fn3 resembles the immunoglobulin fold. Fn3 domains comprise, in order from N-terminus to C-terminus, a beta or beta-like strand, A; a loop, AB; a beta or beta-like strand, B; a loop, BC; a beta or beta-like strand, C; a loop, CD; a beta or beta-like strand, D; a loop, DE; a beta or beta-like strand, E; a loop, EF; a beta or beta-like strand, F; a loop, FG; and a beta or beta-like strand, G. The seven antiparallel β-strands are arranged as two beta sheets that form a stable core, while creating two “faces” composed of the loops that connect the beta or beta-like strands. Loops AB, CD, and EF are located at one face and loops BC, DE, and FG are located on the opposing face. Any or all of loops AB, BC, CD, DE, EF and FG may participate in ligand binding. There are at least 15 different modules of Fn3, and while the sequence homology between the molecules is low, they all share a high similarity in tertiary structure.


Adnectins™ (Adnexus, a Bristol-Myers Squibb R&D Company) are ligand binding scaffold proteins based on the tenth fibronectin type III domain, i.e., the tenth module of Fn3, (10Fn3). The amino acid sequence of a naturally occurring human 10Fn3 is set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1.


VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDAPAVTVRYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGSKST ATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTGRGDSPASSKPISINYRT (SEQ ID NO:1) (BC, FG, and DE loops are emphasized)


In SEQ ID NO:1, the AB loop corresponds to residues 15-16, the BC loop corresponds to residues 21-30, the CD loop corresponds to residues 39-45, the DE loop corresponds to residues 51-56, the EF loop corresponds to residues 60-66, and the FG loop corresponds to residues 76-87. (Xu et al., Chemistry & Biology 2002 9:933-942). The BC, DE and FG loops align along one face of the molecule and the AB, CD and EF loops align along the opposite face of the molecule. In SEQ ID NO: 1, beta strand A corresponds to residues 9-14, beta strand B corresponds to residues 17-20, beta strand C corresponds to residues 31-38, beta strand D corresponds to residues 46-50, beta strand E corresponds to residues 57-59, beta strand F corresponds to residues 67-75, and beta strand G corresponds to residues 88-94. The strands are connected to each other through the corresponding loop, e.g., strands A and B are connected via loop AB in the formation strand A, loop AB, strand B, etc. Residues involved in forming the hydrophobic core (the “core amino acid residues”) include the amino acids corresponding to the following amino acids of SEQ ID NO: 1: L8, V10, A13, L18, I20, W22, Y32, I34, Y36, F48, V50, A57, I59, L62, Y68, I70, V72, A74, I88, I90 and Y92, wherein the core amino acid residues are represented by the single letter amino acid code followed by the position at which they are located within SEQ ID NO: 1. See e.g., Dickinson et al., J. Mol. Biol. 236: 1079-1092 (1994).


As described above, amino acid residues corresponding to residues 21-30, 51-56, and 76-87 of SEQ ID NO: 1 define the BC, DE and FG loops, respectively. However, it should be understood that not every residue within the loop region needs to be modified in order to achieve a 10Fn3 binder having strong affinity for a desired target, such as IGF-IR or EGFR. For example, in many of the examples described herein, only residues corresponding to amino acids 23-30, 52-55 and 77-86 of SEQ ID NO: 1 were modified to produce high affinity 10Fn3 binders (see FIG. 46. Accordingly, in certain embodiments, the BC loop may be defined by amino acids corresponding to residues 23-30 of SEQ ID NO: 1, the DE loop may be defined by amino acids corresponding to residues 52-55 of SEQ ID NO: 1, and the FG loop may be defined by amino acids corresponding to residues 77-86 of SEQ ID NO: 1.



10Fn3 are structurally and functionally analogous to antibodies, specifically the variable region of an antibody. While 10Fn3 domains may be described as “antibody mimics” or “antibody-like proteins”, they do offer a number of advantages over conventional antibodies. In particular, they exhibit better folding and thermostability properties as compared to antibodies, and they lack disulphide bonds, which are known to impede or prevent proper folding under certain conditions. Exemplary E/I 10Fn3 based binders are predominantly monomeric with Tm's averaging ˜50° C.


The BC, DE, and FG loops of 10Fn3 are analogous to the complementary determining regions (CDRs) from immunoglobulins. Alteration of the amino acid sequence in these loop regions changes the binding specificity of 10Fn3. The protein sequences outside of the CDR-like loops are analogous to the framework regions from immunoglobulins and play a role in the structural conformation of the 10Fn3. Alterations in the framework-like regions of 10Fn3 are permissible to the extent that the structural conformation is not so altered as to disrupt ligand binding. Methods for generating 10Fn3 ligand specific binders have been described in PCT Publication Nos. WO 00/034787, WO 01/64942, and WO 02/032925, disclosing high affinity TNFα binders, PCT Publication No. WO 2008/097497, disclosing high affinity VEGFR2 binders, and PCT Publication No. WO 2008/066752, disclosing high affinity IGFIR binders. Additional references discussing 10Fn3 binders and methods of selecting binders include PCT Publication Nos. WO 98/056915, WO 02/081497, and WO 2008/031098 and U.S. Publication No. 2003186385.


Antibody-like proteins based on the 10Fn3 scaffold can be defined generally by the sequence:


VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLI(X)nYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTV(X)oATISGLKPGVDYTITV YAV(X)pISINYRT (SEQ ID NO: 32), wherein n is an integer from 1-20, o is an integer from 1-20, and p is an integer from 1-40. The BC, DE, and FG loops are represented by (X)n, (X)o, and (X)p, respectively.



10Fn3 generally begin with the amino acid residue corresponding to number 1 of SEQ ID NO: 1. However, domains with amino acid deletions are also encompassed by the invention. In some embodiments, amino acid residues corresponding to the first eight amino acids of SEQ ID NO: 1 are deleted. Additional sequences may also be added to the N- or C-terminus. For example, an additional MG sequence may be placed at the N-terminus of 10Fn3. The M will usually be cleaved off, leaving a G at the N-terminus. In some embodiments, sequences may be placed at the C-terminus of the 10Fn3 domain, e.g., EIDKPSQ (SEQ ID NO: 9), EIDKPCQ (SEQ ID NO: 10), EGSGS (SEQ ID NO: 96) or EGSGC (SEQ ID NO: 97).


The non-ligand binding sequences of 10Fn3, i.e., the “10Fn3 scaffold”, may be altered provided that the 10Fn3 retains ligand binding function and/or structural stability. In some embodiments, one or more of Asp 7, Glu 9, and Asp 23 are replaced by another amino acid, such as, for example, a non-negatively charged amino acid residue (e.g., Asn, Lys, etc.). These mutations have been reported to have the effect of promoting greater stability of the mutant 10Fn3 at neutral pH as compared to the wild-type form (See, PCT Publication No. WO 02/04523). A variety of additional alterations in the 10Fn3 scaffold that are either beneficial or neutral have been disclosed. See, for example, Batori et al., Protein Eng. 2002 15(12):1015-20; Koide et al., Biochemistry 2001 40(34):10326-33.


The 10Fn3 scaffold may be modified by one or more conservative substitutions. As many as 5%, 10%, 20% or even 30% or more of the amino acids in the 10Fn3 scaffold may be altered by a conservative substitution without substantially altering the affinity of the 10Fn3 for a ligand. For example, the scaffold modification preferably reduces the binding affinity of the 10Fn3 binder for a ligand by less than 100-fold, 50-fold, 25-fold, 10-fold, 5-fold, or 2-fold. It may be that such changes will alter the immunogenicity of the 10Fn3 in vivo, and where the immunogenicity is decreased, such changes will be desirable. As used herein, “conservative substitutions” are residues that are physically or functionally similar to the corresponding reference residues. That is, a conservative substitution and its reference residue have similar size, shape, electric charge, chemical properties including the ability to form covalent or hydrogen bonds, or the like. Preferred conservative substitutions are those fulfilling the criteria defined for an accepted point mutation in Dayhoff et al., Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure 5:345-352 (1978 & Supp.). Examples of conservative substitutions are substitutions within the following groups: (a) valine, glycine; (b) glycine, alanine; (c) valine, isoleucine, leucine; (d) aspartic acid, glutamic acid; (e) asparagine, glutamine; (f) serine, threonine; (g) lysine, arginine, methionine; and (h) phenylalanine, tyrosine.


E Binders


In one aspect, the disclosure provides antibody-like proteins comprising an EGFR binding 10Fn3 domain. In certain embodiments, an EGFR binding 10Fn3 may be provided as part of a fusion protein or multimer. For example, an EGFR binding 10Fn3 may be covalently or non-covalently linked to at least a second 10Fn3 binding domain. The second 10Fn3 binding domain may bind to EGFR or to a different target. In an exemplary embodiment, an EGFR binding 10Fn3 may be covalently or non-covalently linked to an IGF-IR binding 10Fn3.


In exemplary embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 proteins described herein bind to EGFR with a KD of less than 500 nM, 100 nM, 50 nM, 10 nM, 1 nM, 500 pM, 100 pM, 100 pM, 50 pM or 10 pM.


In exemplary embodiments, the BC loop of the EGFR binding 10Fn3 proteins correspond to amino acids 23-30 of SEQ ID NO: 1, the DE loop of the EGFR binding 10Fn3 proteins correspond to amino acids 52-55 of SEQ ID NO: 1, and the FG loop of the EGFR binding 10Fn3 proteins correspond to amino acids 77-86 of SEQ ID NO: 1.


In one embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having a YQ at the positions corresponding to amino acids 29 and 30 of SEQ ID NO: 1.


In another embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having a YQ at the positions corresponding to amino acids 29 and 30 of SEQ ID NO: 1 and an FG loop that is fifteen amino acids in length, e.g., an FG loop that is extended in length by five amino acids due to an insertion of five amino acids between residues corresponding to amino acids 77-86 of SEQ ID NO: 1.


In another embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having a YQ at the positions corresponding to amino acids 29 and 30 of SEQ ID NO: 1 and a DE loop having a V, I, L, M or A residue at the position corresponding to amino acid 54 of SEQ ID NO: 1.


In another embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having a YQ at the positions corresponding to amino acids 29 and 30 of SEQ ID NO: 1, a DE loop having a V, I, L, M or A residue at the position corresponding to amino acid 54 of SEQ ID NO: 1, and an FG loop that is fifteen amino acids in length, e.g., an FG loop that is extended in length by five amino acids due to an insertion of five amino acids between residues corresponding to amino acids 77-86 of SEQ ID NO: 1.


In another embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having a YQ at the positions corresponding to amino acids 29 and 30 of SEQ ID NO: 1 and an FG loop comprising a D or N at the position corresponding to amino acid 77 of SEQ ID NO: 1.


In another embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having a YQ at the positions corresponding to amino acids 29 and 30 of SEQ ID NO: 1 and an FG loop (i) that is fifteen amino acids in length, e.g., an FG loop that is extended in length by five amino acids due to an insertion of five amino acids between residues corresponding to amino acids 77-86 of SEQ ID NO: 1 and (ii) comprises a D or N at the position corresponding to amino acid 77 of SEQ ID NO: 1.


In another embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a DE loop comprising a V, I, L, M or A residue at the position corresponding to amino acid 54 of SEQ ID NO: 1 and an FG loop comprising a D or N at the position corresponding to amino acid 77 of SEQ ID NO: 1.


In another embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a DE loop comprising a V, I, L, M or A residue at the position corresponding to amino acid 54 of SEQ ID NO: 1 and an FG loop (i) that is fifteen amino acids in length, e.g., an FG loop that is extended in length by five amino acids due to an insertion of five amino acids between residues corresponding to amino acids 77-86 of SEQ ID NO: 1 and (ii) comprises a D or N at the position corresponding to amino acid 77 of SEQ ID NO: 1.


In another embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having a YQ at the positions corresponding to amino acids 29 and 30 of SEQ ID NO: 1, a DE loop comprising a V, I, L, M or A residue at the position corresponding to amino acid 54 of SEQ ID NO: 1, and an FG loop comprising a D or N at the position corresponding to amino acid 77 of SEQ ID NO: 1.


In another embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having a YQ at the positions corresponding to amino acids 29 and 30 of SEQ ID NO: 1, a DE loop comprising a V, I, L, M or A residue at the position corresponding to amino acid 54 of SEQ ID NO: 1, and an FG loop (i) that is fifteen amino acids in length, e.g., an FG loop that is extended in length by five amino acids due to an insertion of five amino acids between residues corresponding to amino acids 77-86 of SEQ ID NO: 1 and (ii) comprises a D or N at the position corresponding to amino acid 77 of SEQ ID NO: 1.


In another embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop comprising the amino acid sequence XXXXXXYQ, a DE loop comprising the amino acid sequence XX(V/I/L/M/A)X, and an FG loop comprising the amino acid sequence (D/N)Xn, wherein X is any amino acid and n is 9-14 amino acids. In an exemplary embodiment, n is 14 amino acids.


In another embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop corresponding to amino acids 23-30 of SEQ ID NO: 1 comprising the amino acid sequence XXXXXXYQ, a DE loop corresponding to amino acids 52-55 of SEQ ID NO: 1 comprising the amino acid sequence XX(V/I/L/M/A)X, and an FG loop corresponding to amino acids 77-86 of SEQ ID NO: 1 comprising the amino acid sequence (D/N)Xn, wherein X is any amino acid and n is 9-14 amino acids. In an exemplary embodiment, n is 14 amino acids.


In another embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop comprising the amino acid sequence XXXXXXYQ, a DE loop comprising the amino acid sequence XX(V/I/L/M/A)X, and an FG loop comprising an amino acid sequence selected from:


i. (D/N)(Y/M)(Y/A/M)(Y/H/F)(K/Q/V)(E/P/R)(Y/T/K)X(E/Y/Q)(Y/G/H); and


ii. D(Y/F/W)(Y/F/K)(N/D/P)(P/H/L)(A/T/V)(T/D/S)(H/Y/G)(E/P/V)(Y/H)(T/K/I) (Y/F)(H/N/Q)(T/Q/E)(T/S/I);


wherein X is any amino acid.


In another embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop comprising the amino acid sequence XXXXXXYQ, a DE loop comprising the amino acid sequence (G/Y/H)(D/M/G)(V/L/I)X, and an FG loop comprising an amino acid sequence (D/N)(Y/M)(Y/A/M)(Y/H/F)(K/Q/V)(E/P/R)(Y/T/K)X(E/Y/Q)(Y/G/H), wherein X is any amino acid.


In another embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop comprising the amino acid sequence XXXXXXYQ, a DE loop comprising the amino acid sequence (G/Y/H)(D/M/G)(V/L/I)X, and an FG loop comprising an amino acid sequence D (Y/F/W) (Y/F/K) (N/D/P)(P/H/L)(A/T/V)(T/D/S)(H/Y/G)(E/P/V)(Y/H)(T/K/I)(Y/F)(H/N/Q)(T/Q/E)(T/S/I), wherein X is any amino acid.


In another embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop comprising the amino acid sequence XXXXXXYQ, a DE loop comprising the amino acid sequence XX(V/I/L/M/A)X, and an FG loop comprising an amino acid sequence selected from:









(SEQ ID NO: 473)








i.
DY(A/Y)GKPYXEY;










(SEQ ID NO: 474)








ii.
DY(A/Y)Y(K/R/Q/T)PYXEY;










(SEQ ID NO: 475)








iii.
(D/N)Y(A/Y)(Y/F)(K/R/Q/T)EYXE(Y/H);










(SEQ ID NO: 476)








iv.
DYY(H/Y)X(R/K)X(E/T)YX;










(SEQ ID NO: 477)








v.
DYY(H/Y)(K/H/Q)(R/K)T(E/T)Y(G/P);










(SEQ ID NO: 478)








vi.
(D/N)MMHV(E/D)YXEY;










(SEQ ID NO: 479)








vii.
DYMHXXYXEY;



and










(SEQ ID NO: 480)








viii.
D(M/Y)YHX(K/R)X(V/I/L/M)YG;






wherein X is any amino acid.


In another embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop comprising the amino acid sequence XXXXXXYQ, a DE loop comprising the amino acid sequence XX(V/I/L/M/A)X, and an FG loop comprising an amino acid sequence selected from:









(SEQ ID NO: 481)








i.
D(Y/F)(Y/F)NPXTHEYXYXXX;










(SEQ ID NO: 482)








ii.
D(Y/F)(Y/F)D(P/L)X(T/S)HXYXYXXX;



and










(SEQ ID NO: 483)








iii.
D(Y/F)(K/R)PHXDGPH(T/I)YXE(S/Y);






wherein X is any amino acid.


In another embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop comprising the amino acid sequence XXXXXXYQ, a DE loop comprising the amino acid sequence XX(V/I/L/M/A)X, and an FG loop comprising the amino acid sequence (DIN)(M/Y)(M/A/W)(H/F/Y)(V/K)EY(A/Q/R/S/T)E(Y/H/D), wherein X is any amino acid.


In another embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop comprising the amino acid sequence XXXXXXYQ, a DE loop comprising the amino acid sequence XX(V/I/L/M/A)X, and an FG loop comprising the amino acid sequence D(Y/F/W)(Y/F/K)(N/P/D)(P/H/L)X(T/D/S)(H/G/Y)(E/P/Y)(Y/H)XYXXX, wherein X is any amino acid.


In various embodiments, the DE loop of the EGFR binding 10Fn3 may comprise the sequence (G/Y/H)(D/M/G)(V/L/I)X.


In another embodiment, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising an FG loop comprising an amino acid sequence selected from:









(SEQ ID NO: 481)








i.
D(Y/F)(Y/F)NPXTHEYXYXXX;










(SEQ ID NO: 482)








ii.
D(Y/F)(Y/F)D(P/L)X(T/S)HXYXYXXX;



and










(SEQ ID NO: 483)








iii.
D(Y/F)(K/R)PHXDGPH(T/I)YXE(S/Y);






wherein X is any amino acid.


In certain embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises any of the consensus sequences provided above, with the proviso that the EGFR binding 10Fn3 does not comprise one or more of the following sequences:









(SEQ ID NO: 484)








i.
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWQVPRPMYQRYYRITYGETGGN



SPVQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDYMHSEYRQ



YPISINYRT,



and










(SEQ ID NO: 485)








ii.
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWQVPRPMYQYYRITYGETGGNS



PVQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDYMHSEYRQY



PISINYRT,



and










(SEQ ID NO: 486)








iii.
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWQVPRPMYQRYYRITYGETGGN



SPVQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDYMHSEYRQ



YPISINYRTEIDKPCQ.






In certain embodiments, an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising one of the consensus sequences provided above has at least 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 75%, or 80% identity to SEQ ID NO: 1. In certain embodiments, the overall structure of an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising one of the consensus sequences provided above resembles the immunoglobulin fold. In certain embodiment, an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising one of the consensus sequences provided above further comprises the core amino acid residues of the scaffold. In certain embodiments, an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising one of the consensus sequences provided above has at least 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, or 99% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 5-8, 52, 66-68, 106-108, 112-114, 140-142, 155-157, 170-172, 182, 185-187, 198-200, or 219-327. In certain embodiments, an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising one of the consensus sequences provided above has at least 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, or 99% identity to the amino acid sequence of amino acid residues corresponding to E9 of SEQ ID NO: 1 through T94 of SEQ ID NO: 1 of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 5-8, 52, 66-68, 106-108, 112-114, 140-142, 155-157, 170-172, 182, 185-187, 198-200, or 219-327. In certain embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising one of the consensus sequences provided above comprises a 10Fn3 scaffold having from has anywhere from 0 to 20, from 0 to 15, from 0 to 10, from 0 to 8, from 0 to 6, from 0 to 5, from 0 to 4, from 0 to 3, from 0 to 2, or from 0 to 1 substitutions, conservative substitutions, deletions or additions relative to the scaffold amino acids residues of SEQ ID NO: 1.


In certain embodiments, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 23-30, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 52-55, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 77-86 of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 219-327. In certain embodiments, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-87 of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 219-327. In certain embodiments, the invention provides an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising an amino acid sequence at least 60%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, or 98% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 219-327.


In one embodiment, an antibody-like protein is provided comprising a tenth fibronectin type III domain (10Fn3) that binds EGFR with a KD of less than 500 nM and comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30 of SEQ ID NO: 5, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56 of SEQ ID NO: 5, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-92 of SEQ ID NO: 5. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XgDSGRGSYQXh (SEQ ID NO: 40), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XiGPVHXj (SEQ ID NO: 42), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XkDHKPHADGPHTYHEXl (SEQ ID NO: 44); wherein X is any amino acid and g, h, i, j, k, and l are integers independently selected from 0 to 5. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWDSGRGSYQ (SEQ ID NO: 39), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PGPVHT (SEQ ID NO: 41), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TDHKPHADGPHTYHESP (SEQ ID NO: 43). In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 5 or 6.


In one embodiment, an antibody-like protein is provided comprising a tenth fibronectin type III domain (10Fn3) that binds EGFR with a KD of less than 500 nM and comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30 of SEQ ID NO: 7, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56 of SEQ ID NO: 7, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-87 of SEQ ID NO: 7. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XmVAGAEDYQXn (SEQ ID NO: 34), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XoHDLVXp (SEQ ID NO: 36), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XqDMMHVEYTEHXr (SEQ ID NO: 38); wherein X is any amino acid and m, n, o, p, q, and r are integers independently selected from 0 to 5. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWVAGAEDYQ (SEQ ID NO: 33), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PHDLVT (SEQ ID NO: 35), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TDMMHVEYTEHP (SEQ ID NO: 37). In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 7 or 8.


In one embodiment, an antibody-like protein is provided comprising a tenth fibronectin type III domain (10Fn3) that binds EGFR with a KD of less than 500 nM and comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 23-30 of SEQ ID NO: 82, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-55 of SEQ ID NO: 82, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-86 of SEQ ID NO: 82. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XsLPGKLRYQXt (SEQ ID NO: 60), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XuHDLRw (SEQ ID NO: 62), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XyNMMHVEYSEYXz (SEQ ID NO: 64); wherein X is any amino acid and s, t, u, w, y and z are integers independently selected from 0 to 5. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence LPGKLRYQ (residues 3-13 of SEQ ID NO: 59), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PHDLR (residues 1-5 of SEQ ID NO: 61), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TNMMHVEYSEY (residues 1-11 of SEQ ID NO: 63). In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 52 or 82.


In one embodiment, an antibody-like protein is provided comprising a tenth fibronectin type III domain (10Fn3) that binds EGFR with a KD of less than 500 nM and comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 23-30 of SEQ ID NO: 106, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-55 of SEQ ID NO: 106, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-86 of SEQ ID NO: 106. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XgHERDGSRQXh (SEQ ID NO: 134), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XiGGVRXj (SEQ ID NO: 135), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XkDYFNPTTHEYIYQTTXl (SEQ ID NO: 136); wherein X is any amino acid and g, h, i, j, k and l are integers independently selected from 0 to 5. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWHERDGSRQ (SEQ ID NO: 109), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PGGVRT (SEQ ID NO: 110), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TDYFNPTTHEYIYQTTP (SEQ ID NO: 111). In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, or 100% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 106-108.


In one embodiment, an antibody-like protein is provided comprising a tenth fibronectin type III domain (10Fn3) that binds EGFR with a KD of less than 500 nM and comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 23-30 of SEQ ID NO: 112, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-55 of SEQ ID NO: 112, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-86 of SEQ ID NO: 112. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XgWAPVDRYQXh (SEQ ID NO: 137), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XiRDVYXj (SEQ ID NO: 138), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XkDYKPHADGPHTYHESXl (SEQ ID NO: 139); wherein X is any amino acid and g, h, i, j, k and l are integers independently selected from 0 to 5. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWWAPVDRYQ (SEQ ID NO: 115), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PRDVYT (SEQ ID NO: 116), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TDYKPHADGPHTYHESP (SEQ ID NO: 117). In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, or 100% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 112-114.


In one embodiment, an antibody-like protein is provided comprising a tenth fibronectin type III domain (10Fn3) that binds EGFR with a KD of less than 500 nM and comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 13-22 of SEQ ID NO: 141, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 43-48 of SEQ ID NO: 141, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 68-84 of SEQ ID NO: 141. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XgTQGSTHYQXh (SEQ ID NO: 146), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XiGMVYXj (SEQ ID NO: 147), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XkDYFDRSTHEYKYRTTXl (SEQ ID NO: 148); wherein X is any amino acid and g, h, i, j, k and l are integers independently selected from 0 to 5. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWTQGSTHYQ (SEQ ID NO: 143), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PGMVYT (SEQ ID NO: 144), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TDYFDRSTHEYKYRTTP (SEQ ID NO: 145). In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, or 100% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 140-142.


In one embodiment, an antibody-like protein is provided comprising a tenth fibronectin type III domain (10Fn3) that binds EGFR with a KD of less than 500 nM and comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 13-22 of SEQ ID NO: 156, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 43-48 of SEQ ID NO: 156, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 68-84 of SEQ ID NO: 156. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XgYWEGLPYQXh (SEQ ID NO: 161), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XiRDVNXj (SEQ ID NO: 162), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XkDWYNPDTHEYIYHTIXl (SEQ ID NO: 163); wherein X is any amino acid and g, h, i, j, k and l are integers independently selected from 0 to 5. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWYWEGLPYQ (SEQ ID NO: 158), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PRDVNT (SEQ ID NO: 159), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TDWYNPDTHEYIYHTIP (SEQ ID NO: 160). In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, or 100% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 155-157.


In one embodiment, an antibody-like protein is provided comprising a tenth fibronectin type III domain (10Fn3) that binds EGFR with a KD of less than 500 nM and comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 13-22 of SEQ ID NO: 171, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 43-48 of SEQ ID NO: 171, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 68-84 of SEQ ID NO: 171. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XgASNRGTYQXh (SEQ ID NO: 176), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XiGGVSXj (SEQ ID NO: 177), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XkDAFNPTTHEYNYFTTXl (SEQ ID NO: 178); wherein X is any amino acid and g, h, i, j, k and l are integers independently selected from 0 to 5. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWASNRGTYQ (SEQ ID NO: 173), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PGGVST (SEQ ID NO: 174), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TDAFNPTTHEYNYFTTP (SEQ ID NO: 175). In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, or 100% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 170-172.


In one embodiment, an antibody-like protein is provided comprising a tenth fibronectin type III domain (10Fn3) that binds EGFR with a KD of less than 500 nM and comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 13-22 of SEQ ID NO: 186, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 43-48 of SEQ ID NO: 186, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 68-84 of SEQ ID NO: 186. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XgDAPTSRYQXh (SEQ ID NO: 190), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XiGGLSXj (SEQ ID NO: 191), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XkDYKPHADGPHTYHESX1 (SEQ ID NO: 139); wherein X is any amino acid and g, h, i, j, k and l are integers independently selected from 0 to 5. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWDAPTSRYQ (SEQ ID NO: 188), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PGGLST (SEQ ID NO: 189), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TDYKPHADGPHTYHESP (SEQ ID NO: 117). In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, or 100% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 185-187.


In one embodiment, an antibody-like protein is provided comprising a tenth fibronectin type III domain (10Fn3) that binds EGFR with a KD of less than 500 nM and comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 13-22 of SEQ ID NO: 199, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 43-48 of SEQ ID NO: 199, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 68-84 of SEQ ID NO: 199. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XgDAGAVTYQXh (SEQ ID NO: 203), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XiGGVRXj (SEQ ID NO: 135), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XkDYKPHADGPHTYHEYXl (SEQ ID NO: 204); wherein X is any amino acid and g, h, i, j, k and l are integers independently selected from 0 to 5. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWDAGAVTYQ (SEQ ID NO: 201), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PGGVRT (SEQ ID NO: 110), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TDYKPHADGPHTYHEYP (SEQ ID NO: 202). In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, or 100% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 198-200.


In certain embodiments, an EGFR binding 10Fn3 domain is covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGF-IR binding 10Fn3 domain. In exemplary embodiments, the IGF-IR binding 10Fn3 may comprise a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30 of SEQ ID NO: 3, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56 of SEQ ID NO: 3, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-83 of SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the IGF-IR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XaSARLKVAXb (SEQ ID NO: 46), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XcKNVYXd (SEQ ID NO: 48), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XeRFRDYQXf (SEQ ID NO: 50), wherein X is any amino acid and a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, and l are integers independently selected from 0 to 5, or wherein a is 2 and b-f are 1, or wherein a-f are zero. In some embodiments, the IGF-IR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, 99, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 3. In certain embodiments, the IGF-IR binding 10Fn3 comprises a 10Fn3 scaffold having from has anywhere from 0 to 20, from 0 to 15, from 0 to 10, from 0 to 8, from 0 to 6, from 0 to 5, from 0 to 4, from 0 to 3, from 0 to 2, or from 0 to 1 substitutions, conservative substitutions, deletions or additions relative to the scaffold amino acid residues of SEQ ID NO: 1. In certain embodiments, the IGF-IR binding 10Fn3 has anywhere from 0 to 15, from 0 to 10, from 0 to 8, from 0 to 6, from 0 to 5, from 0 to 4, from 0 to 3, from 0 to 2, or from 0 to 1 substitutions, conservative substitutions, deletions or additions relative to the corresponding loop sequences of SEQ ID NO: 3.



10Fn3 E/I Binders


One aspect of the disclosure provides E/I binders constructed from antibody-like protein multimers. In some embodiments, an antibody-like protein multimer comprises at least one EGFR binding 10Fn3 covalently or non-covalently linked to at least one IGFIR binding 10Fn3. In certain embodiments, the E/I binders described herein may be constructed as a single polypeptide chain wherein the E and I subunits may be in either orientation, e.g., from N-terminus to C-terminus, in the E-I orientation or in the I-E orientation.


The disclosure relates, in part, to the surprising discovery that multiple 10Fn3 joined via a polypeptide linker correctly fold independently of each other, retain high affinity binding, and that each of the domains retains its functional properties (see e.g., Examples 5-10). Additionally, these E/I 10Fn3 based binders demonstrate desirable biophysical properties such as low aggregation and high melting temperature (Tm) (see e.g., Example 4). The Examples characterize a variety of E/I 10Fn3 based binders. An exemplary IGFIR binding 10Fn3 is set forth in SEQ ID NO: 4. Exemplary EGFR binding 10Fn3 are set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 6, 8, 52, 107, 113, 140, 155, 170, 185 and 198.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder comprises an EGFR binding 10Fn3 and an IGFIR binding 10Fn3, independently having an amino acid sequence at least 40, 50, 60, 70, or 80% identical to the human 10Fn3 domain, shown in SEQ ID NO: 1. Much of the variability will generally occur in one or more of the loops.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder comprises an EGFR binding 10Fn3 and an IGFIR binding 10Fn3, independently having an amino acid sequence at least 70, 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 32, wherein n is an integer from 1-20, o is an integer from 1-20, and p is an integer from 1-40. In some embodiments, n is an integer from 8-12, o is an integer from 4-8, and p is an integer from 4-28. In some embodiments, n is 10, o is 6, and p is 12.


In some embodiments, the disclosure provides multimers of 10Fn3 having at least one loop selected from loop BC, DE, and FG with an altered amino acid sequence relative to the sequence of the corresponding loop of the human 10Fn3. By “altered” is meant one or more amino acid sequence alterations relative to a template sequence (corresponding human fibronectin domain) and includes amino acid additions, deletions, and substitutions. Altering an amino acid sequence may be accomplished through intentional, blind, or spontaneous sequence variation, generally of a nucleic acid coding sequence, and may occur by any technique, for example, PCR, error-prone PCR, or chemical DNA synthesis. In some embodiments, an amino acid sequence is altered by substituting with or adding naturally occurring amino acids.


In some embodiments, one or more loops selected from BC, DE, and FG may be extended or shortened in length relative to the corresponding human fibronectin loop. In particular, the FG loop of the human 10Fn3 is 12 residues long, whereas the corresponding loop in antibody heavy chains ranges from 4-28 residues. To optimize antigen binding, therefore, the length of the FG loop of 10Fn3 may be altered in length as well as in sequence to obtain the greatest possible flexibility and affinity in antigen binding.


In some embodiments of the 10Fn3 molecules, the altered BC loop has up to 10 amino acid substitutions, up to 9 amino acid deletions, up to 10 amino acid insertions, or a combination of substitutions and deletions or insertions. In some embodiments, the altered DE loop has up to 6 amino acid substitutions, up to 5 amino acid deletions, up to 14 amino acid insertions or a combination of substitutions and deletions or insertions. In some embodiments, the FG loop has up to 12 amino acid substitutions, up to 11 amino acid deletions, up to 28 amino acid insertions or a combination of substitutions and deletions or insertions.


Naturally occurring 10Fn3 comprises an “arginine-glycine-aspartic acid” (RGD) integrin-binding motif in the FG loop. Preferred multimers of 10Fn3 lack an RGD integrin-binding motif.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising a) an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30 of SEQ ID NO: 5, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56 of SEQ ID NO: 5, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-92 of SEQ ID NO: 5; covalently or non-covalently linked to b) an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30 of SEQ ID NO: 3, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56 of SEQ ID NO: 3, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-83 of SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, 99, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 5. In some embodiments, the IGFIR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, 99, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the E/I binder comprises an amino acid sequence at least 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, 99, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 20, 21, 23, 24, 90, 92, 101 or 103.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising a) an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30 of SEQ ID NO: 7, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56 of SEQ ID NO: 7, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-87 of SEQ ID NO: 7; covalently or non-covalently linked to b) an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30 of SEQ ID NO: 3, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56 of SEQ ID NO: 3, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-83 of SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 7. In some embodiments, the IGFIR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the E/I binder comprises an amino acid sequence at least 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 26, 27, 29, 30, 89, 91, 100 or 102.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising a) an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30 of SEQ ID NO: 82, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56 of SEQ ID NO: 82, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-87 of SEQ ID NO: 82; covalently or non-covalently linked to b) an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30 of SEQ ID NO: 3, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56 of SEQ ID NO: 3, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-83 of SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 82. In some embodiments, the IGFIR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the E/I binder comprises an amino acid sequence at least 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 53, 54, 87, 88, 98, 99, 104 or 105.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising a) an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30 of SEQ ID NO: 106, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56 of SEQ ID NO: 106, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-92 of SEQ ID NO: 106; covalently or non-covalently linked to b) an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30 of SEQ ID NO: 3, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56 of SEQ ID NO: 3, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-83 of SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 106. In some embodiments, the IGFIR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the E/I binder comprises an amino acid sequence at least 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 118-125.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising a) an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30 of SEQ ID NO: 112, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56 of SEQ ID NO: 112, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-92 of SEQ ID NO: 112; covalently or non-covalently linked to b) an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30 of SEQ ID NO: 3, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56 of SEQ ID NO: 3, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-83 of SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 112. In some embodiments, the IGFIR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the E/I binder comprises an amino acid sequence at least 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 126-133.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising a) an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 13-22 of SEQ ID NO: 141, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 43-48 of SEQ ID NO: 141, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 68-84 of SEQ ID NO: 141; covalently or non-covalently linked to b) an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30 of SEQ ID NO: 3, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56 of SEQ ID NO: 3, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-83 of SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 140, 141, 142 or 300. In some embodiments, the IGFIR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the E/I binder comprises an amino acid sequence at least 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 149-154.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising a) an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 13-22 of SEQ ID NO: 156, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 43-48 of SEQ ID NO: 156, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 68-84 of SEQ ID NO: 156; covalently or non-covalently linked to b) an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30 of SEQ ID NO: 3, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56 of SEQ ID NO: 3, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-83 of SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 155, 156, 157 or 305. In some embodiments, the IGFIR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the E/I binder comprises an amino acid sequence at least 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 158-166.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising a) an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 13-22 of SEQ ID NO: 171, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 43-48 of SEQ ID NO: 171, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 68-84 of SEQ ID NO: 171; covalently or non-covalently linked to b) an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30 of SEQ ID NO: 3, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56 of SEQ ID NO: 3, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-83 of SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 170, 171, 172 or 311. In some embodiments, the IGFIR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the E/I binder comprises an amino acid sequence at least 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 179-184.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising a) an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 13-22 of SEQ ID NO: 186, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 43-48 of SEQ ID NO: 186, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 68-84 of SEQ ID NO: 186; covalently or non-covalently linked to b) an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30 of SEQ ID NO: 3, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56 of SEQ ID NO: 3, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-83 of SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 185, 186, 187 or 320. In some embodiments, the IGFIR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the E/I binder comprises an amino acid sequence at least 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 192-197.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising a) an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 13-22 of SEQ ID NO: 199, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 43-48 of SEQ ID NO: 199, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 68-84 of SEQ ID NO: 199; covalently or non-covalently linked to b) an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30 of SEQ ID NO: 3, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56 of SEQ ID NO: 3, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-83 of SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 198, 199, 200 or 327. In some embodiments, the IGFIR binding 10Fn3 has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the E/I binder comprises an amino acid sequence at least 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, or 100% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 205-210.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XaSARLKVAXb (SEQ ID NO: 46), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XcKNVYXd (SEQ ID NO: 48), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XeRFRDYQXf (SEQ ID NO: 50); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XgDSGRGSYQXh (SEQ ID NO: 40), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XiGPVHXj (SEQ ID NO: 42), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XkDHKPHADGPHTYHEXl(SEQ ID NO: 44); wherein X is any amino acid and a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, and l are integers independently selected from 0 to 5. In some embodiments, a, g, and l are 2; b-f and i-k are 1; and h is zero. In some embodiments, a-l are zero.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWSARLKVAR (SEQ ID NO: 45), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PKNVYT (SEQ ID NO: 47), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TRFRDYQP (SEQ ID NO: 49); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWDSGRGSYQ (SEQ ID NO: 39), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PGPVHT (SEQ ID NO: 41), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TDHKPHADGPHTYHESP (SEQ ID NO: 43).


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XaSARLKVAXb (SEQ ID NO: 46), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XcKNVYXd (SEQ ID NO: 48), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XeRFRDYQXf (SEQ ID NO: 50); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XmVAGAEDYQXn (SEQ ID NO: 34), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XoHDLVXp (SEQ ID NO: 36), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XqDMMHVEYTEHXr (SEQ ID NO: 38); wherein X is any amino acid and a, b, c, d, e, f, m, n, o, p, q, and r are integers from 0 to 5, independently. In some embodiments, a and m are 2; b-f and o-r are 1; and n is zero. In some embodiments, a-f and m-r are zero.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWSARLKVAR (SEQ ID NO: 45), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PKNVYT (SEQ ID NO: 47), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TRFRDYQP (SEQ ID NO: 49); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWVAGAEDYQ (SEQ ID NO: 33), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PHDLVT (SEQ ID NO: 35), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TDMMHVEYTEHP (SEQ ID NO: 37).


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XaSARLKVAXb (SEQ ID NO: 46), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XcKNVYXd (SEQ ID NO: 48), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XeRFRDYQXf (SEQ ID NO: 50); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XsLPGKLRYQXt (SEQ ID NO: 60), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XuHDLRXw (SEQ ID NO: 62), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XyNMMHVEYSEYXz (SEQ ID NO: 64); wherein X is any amino acid and a, b, c, d, e, f, s, t, u, w, y, and z are integers from 0 to 5, independently. In some embodiments, a and s are 2; b-f, u, w, y and z are 1; and t is zero. In some embodiments, a-f, s-u, w, y and z are zero.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWSARLKVAR (SEQ ID NO: 45), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PKNVYT (SEQ ID NO: 47), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TRFRDYQP (SEQ ID NO: 49); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWLPGKLRYQ (SEQ ID NO: 59), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PHDLRT (SEQ ID NO: 61), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TNMMHVEYSEYP (SEQ ID NO: 63).


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XaSARLKVAXb (SEQ ID NO: 46), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XcKNVYXd (SEQ ID NO: 48), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XeRFRDYQXf (SEQ ID NO: 50); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XgHERDGSRQXh (SEQ ID NO: 134), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XiGGVRXj (SEQ ID NO: 135), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XkDYFNPTTHEYIYQTTXl(SEQ ID NO: 136); wherein X is any amino acid and a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k and l are integers from 0 to 5, independently. In some embodiments, a and g are 2; b-f and i-l are 1; and h is zero. In some embodiments, a-l are zero.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWSARLKVAR (SEQ ID NO: 45), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PKNVYT (SEQ ID NO: 47), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TRFRDYQP (SEQ ID NO: 49); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWHERDGSRQ (SEQ ID NO: 109), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PGGVRT (SEQ ID NO: 110), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TDYFNPTTHEYIYQTTP (SEQ ID NO: 111).


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XaSARLKVAXb (SEQ ID NO: 46), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XcKNVYXd (SEQ ID NO: 48), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XeRFRDYQXf (SEQ ID NO: 50); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XgWAPVDRYQXh (SEQ ID NO: 137), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XiRDVYXj (SEQ ID NO: 138), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XkDYKPHADGPHTYHESXl(SEQ ID NO: 139); wherein X is any amino acid and a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k and l are integers from 0 to 5, independently. In some embodiments, a and g are 2; b-f and i-l are 1; and h is zero. In some embodiments, a-l are zero.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWSARLKVAR (SEQ ID NO: 45), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PKNVYT (SEQ ID NO: 47), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TRFRDYQP (SEQ ID NO: 49); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWWAPVDRYQ (SEQ ID NO: 115), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PRDVYT (SEQ ID NO: 116), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TDYKPHADGPHTYHESP (SEQ ID NO: 117).


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XaSARLKVAXb (SEQ ID NO: 46), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XcKNVYXd (SEQ ID NO: 48), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XeRFRDYQXf (SEQ ID NO: 50); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XgTQGSTHYQXh (SEQ ID NO: 146), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XiGMVYXj (SEQ ID NO: 147), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XkDYFDRSTHEYKYRTTXl (SEQ ID NO: 148); wherein X is any amino acid and a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k and l are integers from 0 to 5, independently. In some embodiments, a and g are 2; b-f and i-l are 1; and h is zero. In some embodiments, a-l are zero.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWSARLKVAR (SEQ ID NO: 45), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PKNVYT (SEQ ID NO: 47), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TRFRDYQP (SEQ ID NO: 49); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWTQGSTHYQ (SEQ ID NO: 143), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PGMVYT (SEQ ID NO: 144), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TDYFDRSTHEYKYRTTP (SEQ ID NO: 145).


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XaSARLKVAXb (SEQ ID NO: 46), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XcKNVYXd (SEQ ID NO: 48), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XeRFRDYQXf (SEQ ID NO: 50); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XgYWEGLPYQXh (SEQ ID NO: 161), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XiRDVNXj (SEQ ID NO: 162), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XkDWYNPDTHEYIYHTIXl (SEQ ID NO: 163); wherein X is any amino acid and a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k and l are integers from 0 to 5, independently. In some embodiments, a and g are 2; b-f and i-l are 1; and h is zero. In some embodiments, a-l are zero.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWSARLKVAR (SEQ ID NO: 45), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PKNVYT (SEQ ID NO: 47), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TRFRDYQP (SEQ ID NO: 49); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWYWEGLPYQ (SEQ ID NO: 158), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PRDVNT (SEQ ID NO: 159), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TDWYNPDTHEYIYHTIP (SEQ ID NO: 160).


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XaSARLKVAXb (SEQ ID NO: 46), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XcKNVYXd (SEQ ID NO: 48), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XeRFRDYQXf (SEQ ID NO: 50); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XgASNRGTYQXh (SEQ ID NO: 176), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XiGGVSXj (SEQ ID NO: 177), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XkDAFNPTTHEYNYFTTXl (SEQ ID NO: 178); wherein X is any amino acid and a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k and l are integers from 0 to 5, independently. In some embodiments, a and g are 2; b-f and i-l are 1; and h is zero. In some embodiments, a-l are zero.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWSARLKVAR (SEQ ID NO: 45), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PKNVYT (SEQ ID NO: 47), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TRFRDYQP (SEQ ID NO: 49); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWASNRGTYQ (SEQ ID NO: 173), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PGGVST (SEQ ID NO: 174), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TDAFNPTTHEYNYFTTP (SEQ ID NO: 175).


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XaSARLKVAXb (SEQ ID NO: 46), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XcKNVYXd (SEQ ID NO: 48), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XeRFRDYQXf (SEQ ID NO: 50); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XgDAPTSRYQXh (SEQ ID NO: 190), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XiGGLSXj (SEQ ID NO: 191), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XkDYKPHADGPHTYHESXl (SEQ ID NO: 139); wherein X is any amino acid and a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k and l are integers from 0 to 5, independently. In some embodiments, a and g are 2; b-f and i-l are 1; and h is zero. In some embodiments, a-l are zero.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWSARLKVAR (SEQ ID NO: 45), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PKNVYT (SEQ ID NO: 47), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TRFRDYQP (SEQ ID NO: 49); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWDAPTSRYQ (SEQ ID NO: 188), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PGGLST (SEQ ID NO: 189), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TDYKPHADGPHTYHESP (SEQ ID NO: 117).


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XaSARLKVAXb (SEQ ID NO: 46), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XcKNVYXd (SEQ ID NO: 48), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XeRFRDYQXf (SEQ ID NO: 50); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XgDAGAVTYQXh (SEQ ID NO: 203), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XiGGVRXj (SEQ ID NO: 135), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XkDYKPHADGPHTYHEYXl (SEQ ID NO: 204); wherein X is any amino acid and a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k and l are integers from 0 to 5, independently. In some embodiments, a and g are 2; b-f and i-l are 1; and h is zero. In some embodiments, a-l are zero.


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWSARLKVAR (SEQ ID NO: 45), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PKNVYT (SEQ ID NO: 47), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TRFRDYQP (SEQ ID NO: 49); covalently or non-covalently linked to an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWDAGAVTYQ (SEQ ID NO: 201), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PGGVRT (SEQ ID NO: 110), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TDYKPHADGPHTYHEYP (SEQ ID NO: 202).


In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising a) an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 23-29 of SEQ ID NO: 3, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 52-55 of SEQ ID NO: 3, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 77-82 of SEQ ID NO: 3; covalently or non-covalently linked to b) an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC, DE and FG loop as set forth in any one of SEQ ID NOs: 219-327 (see e.g., FIG. 45 wherein the BC, DE and FG loop sequences for each EGFR binding 10Fn3 are underlined). In some embodiments, an E/I binder is an antibody-like protein dimer comprising a) an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 23-29 of SEQ ID NO: 3, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 52-55 of SEQ ID NO: 3, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 77-82 of SEQ ID NO: 3; covalently or non-covalently linked to b) an EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprising a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids corresponding to amino acid residues 23-30 of SEQ ID NO: 1 of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 5-8, 52, 66-68, 106-108, 112-114, 140-142, 155-157, 170-172, 182, 185-187, 198-200, or 219-327, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids corresponding to amino acid residues 52-55 of SEQ ID NO: 1 of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 5-8, 52, 66-68, 106-108, 112-114, 140-142, 155-157, 170-172, 182, 185-187, 198-200, or 219-327, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids corresponding to amino acid residues 77-86 of SEQ ID NO: 15-8, 52, 66-68, 106-108, 112-114, 140-142, 155-157, 170-172, 182, 185-187, 198-200, or 219-327. In some embodiments, the EGFR binding 10Fn3 of the antibody-like protein dimer comprises an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, or 100% identical to the amino acid sequence of amino acid residues corresponding to E9 of SEQ ID NO: 1 through T94 of SEQ ID NO: 1 of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 5-8, 52, 66-68, 106-108, 112-114, 140-142, 155-157, 170-172, 182, 185-187, 198-200, or 219-327. In some embodiments, the IGFIR binding 10Fn3 of the antibody-like protein dimer has an amino acid sequence at least 80, 90, 95, 98, 99, or 100% identical to the amino acid sequence of amino acid residues corresponding to E9 of SEQ ID NO: 1 through T94 of SEQ ID NO: 1 of SEQ ID NO: 3. In some embodiments, the E/I binder comprises an amino acid sequence at least 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, 99, or 100% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 20-31, 53-58, 87-92, 98-105, 118-133, 149-154, 164-169, 179-184, 192-197, 205-210 and 211-216.


Preferably, X as defined herein is a naturally occurring amino acid.


In certain embodiments, the E binders, or the E and/or I monomers of the E/I binders described herein may contain a Ser to Cys amino acid substitution at a position corresponding to serine 62 or serine 91 of SEQ ID NO: 1.


In certain aspects, the disclosure provides short peptide sequences that mediate EGFR binding. Examples of such sequences include the amino acid residues that correspond to the BC, DE, and FG loops from SEQ ID NOs: 5, 7, 82, 106, 112, 141, 156, 171, 186 and 199. Other examples of such sequences include the amino acid residues that correspond to the BC, DE, and FG loops from SEQ ID NOs: 219-327. In some embodiments, the peptides bind to their respective ligand with a dissociation constant (KD) of less than 500 nM, 100 nM, 50 nM, 5 nM or less. Such sequences may mediate ligand binding in an isolated form or when inserted into a particular protein structure, such as an immunoglobulin or immunoglobulin-like domain.


In one embodiment, an antibody-like protein dimer comprises a polypeptide having the structure A-B-C, wherein A is a polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of a 10Fn3 domain that binds to EGFR, B is a polypeptide linker, and C is a polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of a 10Fn3 domain that binds to IGF-IR. In another embodiment, a antibody-like protein dimer comprises a polypeptide having the structure A-B-C, wherein A is a polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of a 10Fn3 domain that binds to IGF-IR, B is a polypeptide linker, and C is a polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of a 10Fn3 domain that binds to EGFR. Specific examples of antibody-like protein dimers having the structure A-B-C are polypeptides comprising (i) a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence set forth in any one of SEQ ID NOs: 20-31, 53-58, 87-92, 98-105, 118-133, 149-154, 164-169, 179-184, 192-197, 205-210 and 211-216, or (ii) a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence at least 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, or 99% identical to any one of the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 20-31, 53-58, 87-92, 98-105, 118-133, 149-154, 164-169, 179-184, 192-197, 205-210 and 211-216.


In certain embodiments, the A or C region is a polypeptide comprising a 10Fn3 domain that binds to EGFR; wherein the 10Fn3 domain has the structure from N-terminus to C-terminus: beta strand A, loop AB, beta strand B, loop BC, beta strand C, loop CD, beta strand D, loop DE, beta strand E, loop EF, beta strand F, loop FG, beta strand G; wherein: (i) the BC loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 33 or 34, the DE loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 35 or 36, and the FG loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 37 or 38, (ii) the BC loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 39 or 40, the DE loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 41 or 42, and the FG loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 43 or 44, (iii) the BC loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 59 or 60, the DE loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 61 or 62, and the FG loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 63 or 64, (iv) the BC loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 109 or 134, the DE loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 110 or 135, and the FG loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 111 or 136, (v) the BC loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 115 or 137, the DE loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 116 or 138, and the FG loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 117 or 139, (vi) the BC loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 143 or 146, the DE loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 144 or 147, and the FG loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 145 or 148, (vii) the BC loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 158 or 161, the DE loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 159 or 162, and the FG loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 160 or 163, (viii) the BC loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 173 or 176, the DE loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 174 or 177, and the FG loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 175 or 178, (ix) the BC loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 188 or 190, the DE loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 189 or 191, and the FG loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 117 or 139, (x) the BC loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 201 or 203, the DE loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 110 or 135, and the FG loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 202 or 204, or (xi) the BC, DE and FG loops have the amino acid sequences as set forth in any one of SEQ ID NOs: 219-327 (see e.g., FIG. 45 wherein the BC, DE and FG loops for each of SEQ ID NOs: 219-327 are underlined); wherein the 10Fn3 domain folds into an antibody heavy chain variable region-like structure; and wherein the polypeptide binds to EGFR with a KD of less than 100 nM. The 10Fn3 domain that binds to EGFR preferably folds into a structure wherein the 7 beta strands are distributed between two beta sheets that pack against each other forming a stable core and wherein the beta strands are connected by the six loops which are solvent exposed. In exemplary embodiments, the 10Fn3 domain is from 80-150 amino acids in length.


In exemplary embodiments, the A or C region is a 10Fn3 domain that binds to EGFR with a KD of less than 100 nM having a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 83-85 and 466-472 as set forth below:









(SEQ ID NO: 83)



EVVAATXn1SLLIXa1SWVAGAEDYQXa2YYRITYGEXn2QEFTVXa3PHDL




VTXa4ATIXn3DYTITVYAVXn5TDMMHVEYTEHPXn6ISINYRT;






(SEQ ID NO: 84)



EVVAATXn1SLLIXa1SWDSGRGSYQXa2YYRITYGEXn2QEFTVXa3PGPV




HTXa4ATIXn3DYTITVYAVXa5TDHKPHADGPHTYHESPXa6ISINYRT;



or





(SEQ ID NO: 85)



EVVAATXn1SLLIXa1SWLPGKLRYQXa2YYRITYGEXn2QEFTVXa3PHDL




RTXa4ATIXn3DYTITVYAVXa5TNMMHVEYSEYPXa6ISINYRT.






(SEQ ID NO: 466)



EVVAATXn1SLLIXa1SWHERDGSRQXa2YYRITYGEXn2QEFTVXa3PGGV




RTXa4ATIXn3DYTITVYAVXa5TDYFNPTTHEYIYQTTPXa6ISINYRT.






(SEQ ID NO: 467)



EVVAATXn1SLLIXa1SWWAPVDRYQXa2YYRITYGEXn2QEFTVXa3PRDV




YTXa4ATIXn3DYTITVYAVXa5TDYKPHADGPHTYHESPXa6ISINYRT.






(SEQ ID NO: 468)



EVVAATXn1SLLIXa1SWTQGSTHYQXa2YYRITYGEXn2QEFTVXa3PGMV




YTXa4ATIXn3DYTITVYAVXa5TDYFDRSTHEYKYRTTPXa6ISINYRT.






(SEQ ID NO: 469)



EVVAATXn1SLLIXa1SWYWEGLPYQXa2YYRITYGEXn2QEFTVXa3PRDV




NTXa4ATIXn3DYTITVYAVXa5TDWYNPDTHEYIYHTIPXa6ISINYRT.






(SEQ ID NO: 470)



EVVAATXn1SLLIXa1SWASNRGTYQXa2YYRITYGEXn2QEFTVXa3PGGV




STXa4ATIXn3DYTITVYAVXa5TDAFNPTTHEYNYFTTPXa6ISINYRT.






(SEQ ID NO: 471)



EVVAATXn1SLLIXa1SWDAPTSRYQXa2YYRITYGEXn2QEFTVXa3PGGL




STXa4ATIXn3DYTITVYAVXa5TDYKPHADGPHTYHESPXa6ISINYRT.






(SEQ ID NO: 472)



EVVAATXn1SLLIXa1SWDAGAVTYQXa2YYRITYGEXn2QEFTVXa3PGGV




RTXa4ATIXn3DYTITVYAVXa5TDYKPHADGPHTYHEYPXa6ISINYRT.








In SEQ ID NOs: 83-85 and 466-472, the BC, DE and FG loops have a fixed sequence as shown in bold, or a sequence at least 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, or 99% identical to the sequences shown in bold, the AB loop is represented by Xn1, the CD is represented by Xn2, and EF loop is represented by Xn3, and the beta strands A-G are underlined. X represents any amino acid and the subscript following the X represents an integer of the number of amino acids. In particular, n1 may be anywhere from 1-15, 2-15, 1-10, 2-10, 1-8, 2-8, 1-5, 2-5, 1-4, 2-4, 1-3, 2-3, or 1-2 amino acids; n2 and n3 may each independently be anywhere from 2-20, 2-15, 2-10, 2-8, 5-20, 5-15, 5-10, 5-8, 6-20, 6-15, 6-10, 6-8, 2-7, 5-7, or 6-7 amino acids; and a1-a6 may each independently comprise from 0-10, 0-5, 1-10, 1-5, or 2-5 amino acids. In preferred embodiments, n1 is 2 amino acids, n2 is 7 amino acids, n3 is 7 amino acids, and a1-a6 is 0 amino acids. The sequences of the beta strands may have anywhere from 0 to 10, from 0 to 8, from 0 to 6, from 0 to 5, from 0 to 4, from 0 to 3, from 0 to 2, or from 0 to 1 substitutions, deletions or additions across all 7 scaffold regions relative to the corresponding amino acids shown in SEQ ID NO: 1. In an exemplary embodiment, the sequences of the beta strands may have anywhere from 0 to 10, from 0 to 8, from 0 to 6, from 0 to 5, from 0 to 4, from 0 to 3, from 0 to 2, or from 0 to 1 conservative substitutions across all 7 scaffold regions relative to the corresponding amino acids shown in SEQ ID NO: 1. In certain embodiments, the core amino acid residues are fixed and any substitutions, conservative substitutions, deletions or additions occur at residues other than the core amino acid residues. In certain embodiments, the EGFR binder is represented by one of the following amino acid sequences:









(SEQ ID NO: 66)



EVVAATPTSLLISW
VAGAEDYQ
YYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVP
HDLV




TATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTD
MMHVEYTEH
PISINYRT;






(SEQ ID NO: 67)



EVVAATPTSLLISW
DSGRGSYQ
YYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVP
GPVH




TATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVT
DHKPHADGPHTYHES
PISINYRT;






(SEQ ID NO: 68)



EVVAATPTSLLISW
LPGKLRYQ
YYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVP
HDLR




TATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVT
NMMHVEYSEY
PISINYRT;






(SEQ ID NO: 108)



EVVAATPTSLLISW
HERDGSRQ
YYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVP
GGVR




TATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVT
DYFNPTTHEYIYQTT
PISINYRT;



or





(SEQ ID NO: 114)



EVVAATPTSLLISW
WAPVDRYQ
YYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVP
RDVY




TATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVT
DYKPHADGPHTYHES
PISINYRT.






(SEQ ID NO: 141)



EVVAATPTSLLISW
TQGSTHYQ
YYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVP
GMVY




TATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVT
DYFDRSTHEYKYRTT
PISINYRT






(SEQ ID NO: 156)



EVVAATPTSLLISW
YWEGLPYQ
YYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVN




TATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVT
DWYNPDTHEYIYHTI
PISINYRT






(SEQ ID NO: 171)



EVVAATPTSLLISW
ASNRGTYQ
YYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVP
GGVS




TATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVT
DAFNPTTHEYNYFTT
PISINYRT






(SEQ ID NO: 186)



EVVAATPTSLLISW
DAPTSRYQ
YYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVP
GGLS




TATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVT
DYKPHADGPHTYHES
PISINYRT






E112


(SEQ ID NO: 199)



EVVAATPTSLLISW
DAGAVTYQ
YYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVP
GGVR




TATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVT
DYKPHADGPHTYHEY
PISINYRT








In SEQ ID NOs: 66-68, 108, 114, 141, 156, 171, 186 and 199, the sequence of the BC, DE and FG loops have a fixed sequence as shown in bold, or a sequence at least 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, or 99% identical to the sequences shown in bold, and the remaining sequence which is underlined (e.g., the sequence of the 7 beta strands and the AB, CD and EF loops) has anywhere from 0 to 20, from 0 to 15, from 0 to 10, from 0 to 8, from 0 to 6, from 0 to 5, from 0 to 4, from 0 to 3, from 0 to 2, or from 0 to 1 substitutions, conservative substitutions, deletions or additions relative to the corresponding amino acids shown in SEQ ID NO: 66-68, 108, 114, 141, 156, 171, 186 and 199. In certain embodiments, the core amino acid residues are fixed and any substitutions, conservative substitutions, deletions or additions occur at residues other than the core amino acid residues. The 10Fn3 domain that binds to EGFR may optionally comprise an N-terminal extension of from 1-20, 1-15, 1-10, 1-8, 1-5, 1-4, 1-3, 1-2, or 1 amino acids in length. Exemplary N-terminal extensions include (represented by the single letter amino acid code) M, MG, G, MGVSDVPRDL (SEQ ID NO: 69), GVSDVPRDL (SEQ ID NO: 70), and VSDVPRDL (SEQ ID NO: 71), or N-terminal truncations of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 69, 70, or 71. Other suitable N-terminal extensions include, for example, XnSDVPRDL (SEQ ID NO: 72), XnDVPRDL (SEQ ID NO: 73), XnVPRDL (SEQ ID NO: 74), XnPRDL (SEQ ID NO: 75), XnRDL (SEQ ID NO: 76), XnDL (SEQ ID NO: 77), or XnL, wherein n=0, 1 or 2 amino acids, wherein when n=1, X is Met or Gly, and when n=2, X is Met-Gly. The 10Fn3 domain that binds to EGFR may optionally comprise a C-terminal tail. Exemplary C-terminal tails include polypeptides that are from 1-20, 1-15, 1-10, 1-8, 1-5, 1-4, 1-3, 1-2, or 1 amino acids in length. Specific examples of C-terminal tails include EIDKPSQ (SEQ ID NO: 9), EIDKPCQ (SEQ ID NO: 10), and EIDK (SEQ ID NO: 78). In other embodiments, suitable C-terminal tails may be a C-terminally truncated fragment of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10 or 78, including, for example, one of the following amino acid sequences (represented by the single letter amino acid code): E, E1, EID, EIDKP (SEQ ID NO: 79), EIDKPS (SEQ ID NO: 80), or EIDKPC (SEQ ID NO: 81). Other suitable C-terminal tails include, for example, ES, EC, EGS, EGC, EGSGS (SEQ ID NO: 96), EGSGC (SEQ ID NO: 97), or EIEK (SEQ ID NO: 217). In certain embodiments, the 10Fn3 domain that binds to EGFR comprises both an N-terminal extension and a C-terminal tail. In exemplary embodiments, the A region comprises an N-terminal extension beginning with Gly or Met-Gly and a C-terminal extension that does not contain a cysteine residue and the B region comprises an N-terminal extension that does not start with a Met and a C-terminal extension that comprises a cysteine residue. Specific examples of 10Fn3 domains that bind to EGFR are polypeptides comprising (i) a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence set forth in any one of SEQ ID NOs: 5-8, 52, 66-68, 82-85, 106-108, 112-114, 140-142, 155-157, 170-172, 185-187, 198-200, and 219-327, or (ii) a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence at least 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, or 99% identical to the amino acid sequence set forth in any one of SEQ ID NOs: 5-8, 52, 66-68, 82-85, 106-108, 112-114, 140-142, 155-157, 170-172, 185-187, 198-200, and 219-327.


In certain embodiments, the A or C region is a polypeptide comprising a 10Fn3 domain that binds to IGF-IR, wherein the 10Fn3 domain has the structure from N-terminus to C-terminus: beta strand A, loop AB, beta strand B, loop BC, beta strand C, loop CD, beta strand D, loop DE, beta strand E, loop EF, beta strand F, loop FG, beta strand G, wherein the BC loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 45 or 46, the DE loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 47 or 48, and the FG loop has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 49 or 50, wherein the 10Fn3 domain folds into an antibody heavy chain variable region-like structure, and wherein the polypeptide binds to IGF-IR with a KD of less than 100 nM. The 10Fn3 domain that binds to IGF-IR preferably folds into a structure wherein the 7 beta strands are distributed between two beta sheets that pack against each other forming a stable core and wherein the beta strands are connected by the six loops which are solvent exposed. In exemplary embodiments, the 10Fn3 domain is from 80-150 amino acids in length.


In exemplary embodiments, the A or C region is a 10Fn3 domain that binds to IGF-IR with a KD of less than 100 nM having the sequence set forth below:









(SEQ ID NO: 86)



EVVAATXn1SLLIXa1SWSARLKVARXa2YYRITYGEXn2QEFTVXa3PKN







VYTXa4ATIXn3DYTITVYAVXa5TRFRDYQPXa6ISINYRT.








In SEQ ID NO: 86, the BC, DE and FG loops have a fixed sequence as shown in bold, or a sequence at least 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, or 99% identical to the sequences shown in bold, the AB loop is represented by Xn1, the CD loop is represented by Xn2, and the EF loop is represented by Xn3, and the beta strands A-G are underlined. X represents any amino acid and the subscript following the X represents an integer of the number of amino acids. In particular, n1 may be anywhere from 1-15, 2-15, 1-10, 2-10, 1-8, 2-8, 1-5, 2-5, 1-4, 2-4, 1-3, 2-3, or 1-2 amino acids; n2 and n3 may each independently be anywhere from 2-20, 2-15, 2-10, 2-8, 5-20, 5-15, 5-10, 5-8, 6-20, 6-15, 6-10, 6-8, 2-7, 5-7, or 6-7 amino acids; and a1-a6 may each independently comprise from 0-10, 0-5, 1-10, 1-5, or 2-5 amino acids. In preferred embodiments, n1 is 2 amino acids, n2 is 7 amino acids, n3 is 7 amino acids, and a1-a6 is 0 amino acids. The sequences of the beta strands may have anywhere from 0 to 10, from 0 to 8, from 0 to 6, from 0 to 5, from 0 to 4, from 0 to 3, from 0 to 2, or from 0 to 1 substitutions, deletions or additions across all 7 scaffold regions relative to the corresponding amino acids shown in SEQ ID NO: 1. In an exemplary embodiment, the sequences of the beta strands may have anywhere from 0 to 10, from 0 to 8, from 0 to 6, from 0 to 5, from 0 to 4, from 0 to 3, from 0 to 2, or from 0 to 1 conservative substitutions across all 7 scaffold regions relative to the corresponding amino acids shown in SEQ ID NO: 1. In certain embodiments, the core amino acid residues are fixed and any substitutions, conservative substitutions, deletions or additions occur at residues other than the core amino acid residues. In certain embodiments, the IGF-IR binder is represented by the following amino acid sequence:









(SEQ ID NO: 65)



EVVAATPTSLLISW
SARLKVA
RYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVP
KNVY







TATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVT
RFRDY
QPISINYRT.








In SEQ ID NO: 65, the sequence of the BC, DE and FG loops have a fixed sequence as shown in bold, or a sequence at least 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, or 99% identical to the sequences shown in bold, and the remaining sequence which is underlined (e.g., the sequence of the 7 beta strands and the AB, CD and EF loops) has anywhere from 0 to 20, from 0 to 15, from 0 to 10, from 0 to 8, from 0 to 6, from 0 to 5, from 0 to 4, from 0 to 3, from 0 to 2, or from 0 to 1 substitutions, conservative substitutions, deletions or additions relative to the corresponding amino acids shown in SEQ ID NO: 65. In certain embodiments, the core amino acid residues are fixed and any substitutions, conservative substitutions, deletions or additions occur at residues other than the core amino acid residues. The 10Fn3 domain that binds to IGF-IR may optionally comprise an N-terminal extension of from 1-20, 1-15, 1-10, 1-8, 1-5, 1-4, 1-3, 1-2, or 1 amino acids in length. Exemplary N-terminal extensions include (represented by the single letter amino acid code) M, MG, G, MGVSDVPRDL (SEQ ID NO: 69), GVSDVPRDL (SEQ ID NO: 70), and VSDVPRDL (SEQ ID NO: 71), or N-terminal truncations of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 69, 70, or 71. Other suitable N-terminal extensions include, for example, XnSDVPRDL (SEQ ID NO: 72), XnDVPRDL (SEQ ID NO: 73), XnVPRDL (SEQ ID NO: 74), XnPRDL (SEQ ID NO: 75), XnRDL (SEQ ID NO: 76), XnDL (SEQ ID NO: 77), or XnL, wherein n=0, 1 or 2 amino acids, wherein when n=1, X is Met or Gly, and when n=2, X is Met-Gly. The 10Fn3 domain that binds to IGF-IR may optionally comprise a C-terminal tail. Exemplary C-terminal tails include polypeptides that are from 1-20, 1-15, 1-10, 1-8, 1-5, 1-4, 1-3, 1-2, or 1 amino acids in length. Specific examples of C-terminal tails include EIDKPSQ (SEQ ID NO: 9), EIDKPCQ (SEQ ID NO: 10), and EIDK (SEQ ID NO: 78). In other embodiments, suitable C-terminal tails may be a C-terminally truncated fragment of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10 or 78, including, for example, one of the following amino acid sequences (represented by the single letter amino acid code): E, E1, EID, EIDKP (SEQ ID NO: 79), EIDKPS (SEQ ID NO: 80), or EIDKPC (SEQ ID NO: 81). Other suitable C-terminal tails include, for example, ES, EC, EGS, EGC, EGSGS (SEQ ID NO: 96), EGSGC (SEQ ID NO: 97), or EIEK (SEQ ID NO: 217). In certain embodiments, the 10Fn3 domain that binds to IGF-IR comprises both an N-terminal extension and a C-terminal tail. In exemplary embodiments, the A region comprises an N-terminal extension beginning with Gly or Met-Gly and a C-terminal extension that does not contain a cysteine residue and the B region comprises an N-terminal extension that does not start with a Met and a C-terminal extension that comprises a cysteine residue. Specific examples of 10Fn3 domains that bind to IGF-IR are polypeptides comprising (i) a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence set forth in any one of SEQ ID NOs: 3, 4, 65 or 86, or (ii) a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence at least 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, or 99% identical to the amino acid sequence set forth in any one of SEQ ID NOs: 3, 4, 65 or 86.


The B region is a linker as described further herein. In exemplary embodiments, the B region is a polypeptide linker. Exemplary polypeptide linkers include polypeptides having from 1-20, 1-15, 1-10, 1-8, 1-5, 1-4, 1-3, or 1-2 amino acids. Specific examples of suitable polypeptide linkers are described further herein and include, for example, linkers having a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 11-19, 51, 93-95 and 218. In certain embodiments, the linker may be a C-terminal tail polypeptide as described herein, an N-terminal extension polypeptide as described herein, or a combination thereof.


In one embodiment, an antibody-like protein dimer comprises a polypeptide having the structure X1-A-X2-B-X3-C-X4, wherein X1 is an optional N-terminal extension, A is a 10Fn3 domain that binds to EGFR, X2 is an optional C-terminal tail, B is a polypeptide linker, X3 is an optional N-terminal extension, C is a 10Fn3 domain that binds to IGF-IR, and X4 is an optional C-terminal tail. In another embodiment, an antibody-like protein dimer comprises a polypeptide having the structure X1-A-X2-B-X3-C—X4, wherein X1 is an optional N-terminal extension, A is a 10Fn3 domain that binds to IGF-IR, X2 is an optional C-terminal tail, B is a polypeptide linker, X3 is an optional N-terminal extension, C is a 10Fn3 domain that binds to EGFR, and X4 is an optional C-terminal tail. Specific examples of suitable N-terminal extensions and C-terminal tails are described above. In certain embodiments, one or more of X1, X2, B, X3 or X4 may comprise an amino acid residue suitable for pegylation, such as a cysteine or lysine residue. In exemplary embodiments, X4 comprises at least one amino acid suitable for pegylation, such as a cysteine or lysine residue. Specific examples of suitable polypeptide linkers are described further below. Specific examples of antibody-like protein dimers having the structure X1-A-X2-B-X3-C-X4 are polypeptides comprising (i) a polypeptide having the amino acid sequence set forth in any one of SEQ ID NOs: 20-31, 53-58, 87-92, 98-105, 118-133, 149-154, 164-169, 179-184, 192-197, 205-210 and 211-216, or (ii) a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence at least 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, or 99% identical to the amino acid sequence set forth in any one of SEQ ID NOs: 20-31, 53-58, 87-92, 98-105, 118-133, 149-154, 164-169, 179-184, 192-197, 205-210 and 211-216.


In certain embodiments, it may be desirable to tune the potency of one 10Fn3 binding domain relative to the other 10Fn3 binding domain in the antibody-like protein dimers described herein. For example, if the binding affinity of the first 10Fn3 domain is significantly higher than the binding affinity of the second 10Fn3 domain, the biological effect of the first 10Fn3 domain could overwhelm the effects of the second of second 10Fn3 domain. Accordingly, in certain embodiments, it may be desirable for the binding affinities of the first and second 10Fn3 domains of an antibody-like protein dimer to be similar to each other, e.g., binding affinities within 100-fold, 30-fold, 10-fold, 3-fold, 1-fold, 0.3-fold or 0.1-fold, of each other, or binding affinities within 0.1-fold to 10-fold, within 0.3-fold to 10-fold, within 0.1-fold to 3-fold, within 0.3-fold to 3-fold, within 0.1-fold to 1-fold, within 0.3-fold to 1-fold, within 1-fold to 10-fold, within 3-fold to 10-fold, within 3-fold to 30-fold, or within 1-fold to 3-fold of each other.


Conjugation


Multimers of antibody-like proteins may be covalently or non-covalently linked. In some embodiments, an EGFR binding 10Fn3 may be directly or indirectly linked to an IGFIR binding 10Fn3 via a polypeptide linker. Suitable linkers for joining Fn3 are those which allow the separate domains to fold independently of each other forming a three dimensional structure that permits high affinity binding to a target molecule.


The disclosure provides a number of suitable linkers that meet these requirements, including glycine-serine based linkers, glycine-proline based linkers, as well as the linker having the amino acid sequence PSTSTST (SEQ ID NO: 12). The Examples described herein demonstrate that Fn3 domains joined via polypeptide linkers retain their target binding function. In some embodiments, the linker is a glycine-serine based linker. These linkers comprise glycine and serine residues and may be between 8 and 50, 10 and 30, and 10 and 20 amino acids in length. Examples include linkers having an amino acid sequence GSGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGS (SEQ ID NO: 11), GSGSGSGSGS (SEQ ID NO: 13), GGGGS GGGGS GGGGS (SEQ ID NO: 14), GGGGS GGGGS GGGGS GGGGS (SEQ ID NO: 15), GGGGS GGGGS GGGGS GGGGS GGGGS (SEQ ID NO: 16), or GGGGSGGGGSGGGSG (SEQ ID NO: 17). In some embodiments, the linker is a glycine-proline based linker. These linkers comprise glycine and proline residues and may be between 3 and 30, 10 and 30, and 3 and 20 amino acids in length. Examples include linkers having an amino acid sequence GPGPGPG (SEQ ID NO: 18), GPGPGPGPGPG (SEQ ID NO: 19), and GPG (SEQ ID NO: 51). In some embodiments, the linker is a proline-alanine based linker. These linkers comprise proline and alanine residues and may be between 3 and 30, 10 and 30, 3 and 20 and 6 and 18 amino acids in length. Examples of such linkers include SEQ ID NOs: 93, 94 and 95. It is contemplated, that the optimal linker length and amino acid composition may be determined by routine experimentation by methods well known in the art.


In some embodiments, multimers of antibody-like proteins are linked via a polypeptide linker having a protease site that is cleavable by a protease in the blood or target tissue. Such embodiments can be used to release two or more therapeutic proteins for better delivery or therapeutic properties or more efficient production compared to separately producing such proteins.


Additional linkers or spacers, e.g., SEQ ID NOs: 9 and 10, may be introduced at the C-terminus of a Fn3 domain between the Fn3 domain and the polypeptide linker. Additional linkers or spacers may be introduced at the N-terminus of a Fn3 domain between the Fn3 domain and the polypeptide linker.


In some embodiments, multimers of antibody-like proteins may be directly or indirectly linked via a polymeric linker. Polymeric linkers can be used to optimally vary the distance between each protein moiety to create a protein with one or more of the following characteristics: 1) reduced or increased steric hindrance of binding of one or more protein domain when binding to a protein of interest, 2) increased protein stability or solubility, 3) decreased protein aggregation, and 4) increased overall avidity or affinity of the protein.


In some embodiments, multimers of antibody-like proteins are linked via a biocompatible polymer such as a polymeric sugar. The polymeric sugar can include an enzymatic cleavage site that is cleavable by an enzyme in the blood or target tissue. Such embodiments can be used to release two or more therapeutic proteins for better delivery or therapeutic properties or more efficient production compared to separately producing such proteins


In some embodiments, multimers of antibody-like proteins are linked via a polyoxyalkylene, in particular a polyethylene glycol (PEG) moiety. Antibody-like proteins may comprise a cysteine containing linker, such as the linker set forth in SEQ ID NO: 10, 81, 97 or 218. PEG may be conjugated to the cysteine moiety in the linker sequence and may operably link the two domains.


Pharmacokinetic Moieties


In one aspect, the disclosure provides E binders and E/I binders further comprising a pharmacokinetic (PK) moiety. In some embodiments, the E/I binder is a multimer of antibody-like proteins, in particular, a dimer of an EGFR binding 10Fn3 and an IGFIR binding 10Fn3. Improved pharmacokinetics may be assessed according to the perceived therapeutic need. Often it is desirable to increase bioavailability and/or increase the time between doses, possibly by increasing the time that a protein remains available in the serum after dosing. In some instances, it is desirable to improve the continuity of the serum concentration of the protein over time (e.g., decrease the difference in serum concentration of the protein shortly after administration and shortly before the next administration). E binders and E/I binders may be attached to a moiety that reduces the clearance rate of the polypeptide in a mammal (e.g., mouse, rat, or human) by greater than three-fold relative to the unmodified polypeptide. Other measures of improved pharmacokinetics may include serum half-life, which is often divided into an alpha phase and a beta phase. Either or both phases may be improved significantly by addition of an appropriate moiety.


Moieties that tend to slow clearance of a protein from the blood include polyoxyalkylene moieties (e.g., polyethylene glycol); sugars (e.g., sialic acid); and well-tolerated protein moieties (e.g., Fc, Fc fragments, transferrin, or serum albumin).


In some embodiments, the PK moiety is a serum albumin binding protein such as those described in U.S. Publication Nos. 2007/0178082 and 2007/0269422.


In some embodiments, the PK moiety is a serum immunoglobulin binding protein such as those described in U.S. Publication No. 2007/0178082.


In some embodiments, the PK moiety is polyethylene glycol (PEG).


The serum clearance rate of a PK-modified antibody-like protein multimer may be decreased by about 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, or even 90%, relative to the clearance rate of the unmodified E/I binders. The PK-modified multimer may have a half-life (t1/2) which is enhanced relative to the half-life of the unmodified multimer. The half-life of PK-binding polypeptide may be enhanced by at least 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 125%, 150%, 175%, 200%, 250%, 300%, 400% or 500%, or even by 1000% relative to the half-life of the unmodified multimer. In some embodiments, the multimer half-life is determined in vitro, such as in a buffered saline solution or in serum. In other embodiments, the multimer half-life is an in vivo half life, such as the half-life of the multimer in the serum or other bodily fluid of an animal.


In some embodiments, a PK moiety is linked to an antibody-like protein multimer via at least one disulfide bond, a peptide bond, a polypeptide, a polymeric sugar, or a polyethylene glycol moiety. Exemplary polypeptide linkers include PSTSTST (SEQ ID NO: 12), EIDKPSQ (SEQ ID NO: 9), and GS linkers, such as GSGSGSGSGS (SEQ ID NO: 13) and multimers thereof.


Binding/Screening


The disclosure provides E binders and E/I binders, in particular, antibody-like protein multimers such as a dimer of an EGFR binding 10Fn3 and an IGFIR binding 10Fn3. Binding to EGFR or IGFIR may be assessed in terms of equilibrium constants (e.g., dissociation, KD) and in terms of kinetic constants (e.g., on rate constant, kon and off rate constant, koff). In some embodiments, an antibody-like protein monomer or multimer will bind to EGFR with a KD of less than 500 nM, 100 nM, 50 nM, 5 nM or less. In some embodiments, an antibody-like protein multimer will bind to IGFIR with a KD of less than 500 nM, 100 nM, 50 nM, 5 nM or less. Higher KD values may be tolerated where the koff is sufficiently low or the kon is sufficiently high.


E binders and E/I binders may bind to any part of EGFR, including the extracellular domain of a EGFR, in particular the ligand binding domain of EGFR. Binding of E binders and E/I binders to EGFR may disrupt the interaction of EGFR with one or more ligands, including TGF-alpha and EGF, and/or disrupt receptor dimerization. In some embodiments, E binders and E/I binders compete with an anti-EGFR antibody for binding to EGFR. The anti-EGFR antibody may be selected from any known anti-EGFR antibody including panitumumab (Amgen), nimotuzumab (YM Biosciences), zalutumumab (Genmab), EMD72000 (Merck KGaA), and cetuximab (ImClone Systems).


In some embodiments, E binders and E/I binders inhibit downstream signaling of EGFR. EGFR ligand binding leads to homo- or heterodimeric receptor dimerization with EGFR or another HER family member. Dimerization promotes receptor autophosphorylation, which in turn leads to the activation of several signaling pathways.


E/I binders may bind to any part of IGFIR, including the extracellular domain of a IGFIR, in particular the ligand binding domain of IGFIR. Binding of E/I binders to IGFIR may disrupt the interaction of IGFIR with one or more ligands, e.g., IGF-I and IGF-II; and/or disrupt assembly of receptor heterotetramers. In some embodiments, E/I binders compete with an anti-IGFIR antibody for binding to IGFIR. The anti-IGFIR antibody may be selected from any known anti-IGFIR antibody.


In some embodiments, E/I binders inhibit downstream signaling of IGFIR. The IGF-I receptor is composed of two types of subunits: an alpha subunit (a 130-135 kDa protein that is entirely extracellular and functions in ligand binding) and a beta subunit (a 95-kDa transmembrane protein, with transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains). IGFIR is initially synthesized as a single chain proreceptor polypeptide that is processed by glycosylation, proteolytic cleavage, and covalent bonding to assemble into a mature 460-kDa heterotetramer comprising two alpha-subunits and two beta-subunits. The beta subunit(s) possesses ligand-activated tyrosine kinase activity.


EGFR and IGFIR receptor signaling independently activates the MAPK pathway, including the phosphorylation of MEK. Another activated pathway is the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway, including phosphorylation of AKT. Receptor signaling is transduced to the nucleus, resulting in the activation of various transcription factors.


Screening assays may be designed to identify and characterize E binders and E/I binders. Binding assays, such as surface plasmon resonance and ELISA, and assays that detect activated signaling pathways are well-known in the art, see e.g., Example 5. Various antibodies, including many that are commercially available, have been produced which specifically bind to phosphorylated, activated isoforms of EGFR and IGFIR, see e.g., Examples 6 and 7. Downstream signaling events may also be used as an indicator of receptor inhibition, such as by measuring levels of AKT phosphorylation, see e.g., Example 8. Cell proliferation assays are also a useful method for characterizing the ability of candidate E/I binders to bind and inhibit EGFR and IGFIR signaling, see e.g., Example 9.


Polymer Conjugation


Conjugation to a biocompatible polymer may be used to link antibody-like protein multimers and/or to improve the pharmacokinetics of the proteins. The identity, size and structure of the polymer is selected so as to improve the circulation half-life of the multimer or decrease the antigenicity of the multimer without an unacceptable decrease in activity.


Examples of polymers useful in the invention include, but are not limited to, poly(alkylene glycols) such as polyethylene glycol (PEG). The polymer is not limited to a particular structure and can be linear (e.g., alkoxy PEG or bifunctional PEG), or non-linear such as branched, forked, multi-armed (e.g., PEGs attached to a polyol core), and dendritic.


Typically, PEG and other water-soluble polymers (i.e., polymeric reagents) are activated with a suitable activating group appropriate for coupling to a desired site on the polypeptide. Thus, a polymeric reagent will possess a reactive group for reaction with the polypeptide. Representative polymeric reagents and methods for conjugating these polymers to an active moiety are well-known in the art and further described in Zalipsky, S., et al., “Use of Functionalized Poly(Ethylene Glycols) for Modification of Polypeptides” in Polyethylene Glycol Chemistry: Biotechnical and Biomedical Applications, J. M. Harris, Plenus Press, New York (1992), and in Zalipsky (1995) Advanced Drug Reviews 16: 157-182.


Typically, the weight-average molecular weight of the polymer is from about 100 Daltons to about 150,000 Daltons. Exemplary weight-average molecular weights for the biocompatible polymer include about 20,000 Daltons, about 40,000 Daltons, about 60,000 Daltons and about 80,000 Daltons. Branched versions of the biocompatible polymer having a total molecular weight of any of the foregoing can also be used.


In some embodiments, the polymer is PEG. PEG is a well-known, water soluble polymer that is commercially available or can be prepared by ring-opening polymerization of ethylene glycol according to methods well known in the art (Sandler and Karo, Polymer Synthesis, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 3, pages 138-161). The term “PEG” is used broadly to encompass any polyethylene glycol molecule, without regard to size or to modification at an end of the PEG, and can be represented by the formula: X—O(CH2CH2O)n-1CH2CH2OH, where n is 20 to 2300 and X is H or a terminal modification, e.g., a C1-4 alkyl. PEG can contain further chemical groups which are necessary for binding reactions, which result from the chemical synthesis of the molecule; or which act as a spacer for optimal distance of parts of the molecule. In addition, such a PEG can consist of one or more PEG side-chains which are linked together. PEGs with more than one PEG chain are called multiarmed or branched PEGs. Branched PEG are described in, for example, European Published Application No. 473084A and U.S. Pat. No. 5,932,462.


To effect covalent attachment of the polymer molecule(s) to a polypeptide, the hydroxyl end groups of the polymer molecule must be provided in activated form, i.e. with reactive functional groups. Suitably activated polymer molecules are commercially available, e.g. from Nektar Therapeutics, Inc., Huntsville, Ala., USA; PolyMASC Pharmaceuticals plc, UK; or SunBio Corporation, Anyang City, South Korea. Alternatively, the polymer molecules can be activated by conventional methods known in the art, e.g. as disclosed in WO 90/13540. Specific examples of activated PEG polymers include the following linear PEGs: NHS-PEG, SPA-PEG, SSPA-PEG, SBA-PEG, SS-PEG, SSA-PEG, SC-PEG, SG-PEG, SCM-PEG, NOR-PEG, BTC-PEG, EPDX-PEG, NCO-PEG, NPC-PEG, CDI-PEG, ALD-PEG, TRES-PEG, VS-PEG, OPSS-PEG, IODO-PEG, and MAL-PEG, and branched PEGs, such as PEG2-NHS, PEG2-MAL, and those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,932,462 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,643,575, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.


In some embodiments where PEG molecules are conjugated to cysteine residues on an antibody-like protein multimer, the cysteine residues are native to the protein, whereas in other embodiments, one or more cysteine residues are engineered into the protein. Mutations may be introduced into a protein coding sequence to generate cysteine residues. This might be achieved, for example, by mutating one or more amino acid residues to cysteine. Preferred amino acids for mutating to a cysteine residue include serine, threonine, alanine and other hydrophilic residues. Preferably, the residue to be mutated to cysteine is a surface-exposed residue. Algorithms are well-known in the art for predicting surface accessibility of residues based on primary sequence or a protein. Alternatively, surface residues may be predicted by comparing the amino acid sequences of binding polypeptides, given that the crystal structure of the framework based on which binding polypeptides are designed and evolved has been solved (see Himanen et al., Nature. (2001) 20-27; 414(6866):933-8) and thus the surface-exposed residues identified. In some embodiments, cysteine residues are introduced into antibody-like protein multimers at or near the N- and/or C-terminus, or within loop regions. Pegylation of cysteine residues may be carried out using, for example, PEG-maleiminde, PEG-vinylsulfone, PEG-iodoacetamide, or PEG-orthopyridyl disulfide.


In some embodiments, the pegylated antibody-like protein multimer comprises a PEG molecule covalently attached to the alpha amino group of the N-terminal amino acid. Site specific N-terminal reductive amination is described in Pepinsky et al., (2001) JPET, 297, 1059, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,824,784. The use of a PEG-aldehyde for the reductive amination of a protein utilizing other available nucleophilic amino groups is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,002,531, in Wieder et al., (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 254, 12579, and in Chamow et al., (1994) Bioconjugate Chem. 5, 133.


In another embodiment, pegylated antibody-like protein multimer comprises one or more PEG molecules covalently attached to a linker, which in turn is attached to the alpha amino group of the amino acid residue at the N-terminus of the binding polypeptide. Such an approach is disclosed in U.S. Publication No. 2002/0044921 and PCT Publication No. WO 94/01451.


In some embodiments, an antibody-like protein multimer is pegylated at the C-terminus. A protein may be pegylated at the C-terminus by the introduction of C-terminal azido-methionine and the subsequent conjugation of a methyl-PEG-triarylphosphine compound via the Staudinger reaction. This C-terminal conjugation method is described in Cazalis et al., C-Terminal Site-Specific PEGylation of a Truncated Thrombomodulin Mutant with Retention of Full Bioactivity, Bioconjug Chem. 2004; 15(5):1005-1009.


Conventional separation and purification techniques known in the art can be used to purify PEGylated antibody-like protein multimers, such as size exclusion (e.g., gel filtration) and ion exchange chromatography. Products may also be separated using SDS-PAGE. Products that may be separated include mono-, di-, tri-, poly- and un-pegylated binding polypeptide, as well as free PEG. The percentage of mono-PEG conjugates can be controlled by pooling broader fractions around the elution peak to increase the percentage of mono-PEG in the composition. About ninety percent mono-PEG conjugates represents a good balance of yield and activity.


In some embodiments, the pegylated antibody-like protein multimers will preferably retain at least about 25%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or 100% of the biological activity associated with the unmodified protein. In some embodiments, biological activity refers to its ability to bind to EGFR and IGFIR, as assessed by KD, kon or koff. In some embodiments, the pegylated antibody-like protein multimer shows an increase in binding to EGFR and/or IGFIR relative to unpegylated protein.


Deimmunization of Binding Polypeptides


The amino acid sequences of E binders and E/I binders, in particular, antibody-like protein multimers, such as a dimer of an EGFR binding 10Fn3 and an IGFIR binding 10Fn3, may be altered to eliminate one or more B- or T-cell epitopes. A protein, or a multimer of proteins, may be deimmunized to render it non-immunogenic, or less immunogenic, to a given species. Deimmunization can be achieved through structural alterations to the protein. Any deimmunization technique known to those skilled in the art can be employed, see e.g., WO 00/34317, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety.


In one embodiment, the sequences of the E binders and E/I binders can be analyzed for the presence of MHC class II binding motifs. For example, a comparison may be made with databases of MHC-binding motifs such as, for example by searching the “motifs” database on the worldwide web at sitewehil.wehi.edu.au. Alternatively, MHC class II binding peptides may be identified using computational threading methods such as those devised by Altuvia et al. (J. Mol. Biol. 249 244-250 (1995)) whereby consecutive overlapping peptides from the polypeptide are testing for their binding energies to MHC class II proteins. Computational binding prediction algorithms include iTope™, Tepitope, SYFPEITHI, EpiMatrix (EpiVax), and MHCpred. In order to assist the identification of MHC class II-binding peptides, associated sequence features which relate to successfully presented peptides such as amphipathicity and Rothbard motifs, and cleavage sites for cathepsin B and other processing enzymes can be searched for.


Having identified potential (e.g. human) T-cell epitopes, these epitopes are then eliminated by alteration of one or more amino acids, as required to eliminate the T-cell epitope. Usually, this will involve alteration of one or more amino acids within the T-cell epitope itself. This could involve altering an amino acid adjacent the epitope in terms of the primary structure of the protein or one which is not adjacent in the primary structure but is adjacent in the secondary structure of the molecule. The usual alteration contemplated will be amino acid substitution, but it is possible that in certain circumstances amino acid addition or deletion will be appropriate. All alterations can be accomplished by recombinant DNA technology, so that the final molecule may be prepared by expression from a recombinant host, for example by well established methods, but the use of protein chemistry or any other means of molecular alteration may also be used.


Once identified T-cell epitopes are removed, the deimmunized sequence may be analyzed again to ensure that new T-cell epitopes have not been created and, if they have, the epitope(s) can be deleted.


Not all T-cell epitopes identified computationally need to be removed. A person skilled in the art will appreciate the significance of the “strength” or rather potential immunogenicity of particular epitopes. The various computational methods generate scores for potential epitopes. A person skilled in the art will recognize that only the high scoring epitopes may need to be removed. A skilled person will also recognize that there is a balance between removing potential epitopes and maintaining binding affinity of the protein. Therefore, one strategy is to sequentially introduce substitutions into the protein and then test for antigen binding and immunogenicity.


In one aspect, the deimmunized protein is less immunogenic (or rather, elicits a reduced HAMA response) than the original protein in a human subject. Assays to determine immunogenicity are well within the knowledge of the skilled person. Art-recognized methods of determining immune response can be performed to monitor a HAMA response in a particular subject or during clinical trials. Subjects administered deimmunized protein can be given an immunogenicity assessment at the beginning and throughout the administration of said therapy. The HAMA response is measured, for example, by detecting antibodies to the deimmunized protein in serum samples from the subject using a method known to one in the art, including surface plasmon resonance technology (BIAcore) and/or solid-phase ELISA analysis. Alternatively, in vitro assays designed to measure a T-cell activation event are also indicative of immunogenicity.


Additional Modifications


In certain embodiments, E binders and E/I binders, in particular, antibody-like protein multimers such as a dimer of an EGFR binding 10Fn3 and an IGFIR binding 10Fn3, may further comprise post-translational modifications. Exemplary post-translational protein modification include phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, ADP-ribosylation, ubiquitination, glycosylation, carbonylation, sumoylation, biotinylation or addition of a polypeptide side chain or of a hydrophobic group. As a result, the modified E binders and E/I binders may contain non-amino acid elements, such as lipids, poly- or mono-saccharide, and phosphates. A preferred form of glycosylation is sialylation, which conjugates one or more sialic acid moieties to the polypeptide. Sialic acid moieties improve solubility and serum half-life while also reducing the possible immunogenicity of the protein. See, e.g., Raju et al. Biochemistry. 2001 Jul. 31; 40(30):8868-76. Effects of such non-amino acid elements on the functionality of an E binder or E/I binder may be tested for its antagonizing role in EGFR and IGFIR signaling function.


In some embodiments, E binders and E/I binders are modified to enhance antigen-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and/or complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). In some embodiments, the E/I binder is a dimer of an EGFR binding 10Fn3 and an IGFIR binding 10Fn3, further comprising an Fc region. In some embodiments, the Fc region is a variant that enhances ADCC or CDC. The Fc region variant may comprise a human Fc region sequence (e.g., a human IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 or IgG4 Fc region) comprising an amino acid modification (e.g., a substitution) at one or more amino acid positions, including positions 256, 290, 298, 312, 326, 330, 333, 334, 360, 378 or 430, wherein the numbering of the residues in the Fc region is that of the EU index as in Kabat.


Vectors & Polynucleotides Embodiments


Also included in the present disclosure are nucleic acid sequences encoding any of the proteins described herein. As appreciated by those skilled in the art, because of third base degeneracy, almost every amino acid can be represented by more than one triplet codon in a coding nucleotide sequence. In addition, minor base pair changes may result in a conservative substitution in the amino acid sequence encoded but are not expected to substantially alter the biological activity of the gene product. Therefore, a nucleic acid sequence encoding a protein described herein may be modified slightly in sequence and yet still encode its respective gene product.


Exemplary nucleic acids encoding the E/I binders described herein include nucleic acids having SEQ ID NOs: 442-465 or nucleic acids having a sequence at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 442-465. Isolated nucleic acids which differ from the nucleic acids as set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 442-465 due to degeneracy in the genetic code are also within the scope of the invention. Also provided are E/I binders comprising an I monomer encoded by a nucleotide sequence at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% identical to SEQ ID NO: 328 and/or E/I binders comprising an E monomer encoded by a nucleotide sequence at 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 329-441 or 495. Also provided are E binders encoded by a nucleotide sequence at 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 329-441 or 495. In certain embodiments, the nucleotide sequences encoding the E/I binders, an E monomer, or an I monomer do not contain a sequence encoding a 6×His tag (SEQ ID NO: 487).


Nucleic acids encoding any of the various proteins or polypeptides disclosed herein may be synthesized chemically. Codon usage may be selected so as to improve expression in a cell. Such codon usage will depend on the cell type selected. Specialized codon usage patterns have been developed for E. coli and other bacteria, as well as mammalian cells, plant cells, yeast cells and insect cells. See for example: Mayfield et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003 100(2):438-42; Sinclair et al. Protein Expr Purif. 2002 (1):96-105; Connell N D. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2001 (5):446-9; Makrides et al. Microbiol. Rev. 1996 60(3):512-38; and Sharp et al. Yeast. 1991 7(7):657-78.


General techniques for nucleic acid manipulation are within the purview of one skilled in the art and are also described for example in Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Vols. 1-3, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2 ed., 1989, or F. Ausubel et al., Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Green Publishing and Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1987) and periodic updates, herein incorporated by reference. The DNA encoding a protein is operably linked to suitable transcriptional or translational regulatory elements derived from mammalian, viral, or insect genes. Such regulatory elements include a transcriptional promoter, an optional operator sequence to control transcription, a sequence encoding suitable mRNA ribosomal binding sites, and sequences that control the termination of transcription and translation. The ability to replicate in a host, usually conferred by an origin of replication, and a selection gene to facilitate recognition of transformants are additionally incorporated. Suitable regulatory elements are well-known in the art.


The proteins described herein may be produced as a fusion protein with a heterologous polypeptide, which is preferably a signal sequence or other polypeptide having a specific cleavage site at the N-terminus of the mature protein or polypeptide. The heterologous signal sequence selected preferably is one that is recognized and processed (i.e., cleaved by a signal peptidase) by the host cell. For prokaryotic host cells that do not recognize and process a native signal sequence, the signal sequence is substituted by a prokaryotic signal sequence selected, for example, from the group of the alkaline phosphatase, penicillinase, lpp, or heat-stable enterotoxin II leaders. For yeast secretion, the native signal sequence may be substituted by, e.g., the yeast invertase leader, a factor leader (including Saccharomyces and Kluyveromyces alpha-factor leaders), or acid phosphatase leader, the C. albicans glucoamylase leader, or the signal described in PCT Publication No. WO 90/13646. In mammalian cell expression, mammalian signal sequences as well as viral secretory leaders, for example, the herpes simplex gD signal, are available. The DNA for such precursor regions may be ligated in reading frame to DNA encoding the protein.


Expression vectors used in eukaryotic host cells (e.g., yeast, fungi, insect, plant, animal, human, or nucleated cells from other multicellular organisms) will also contain sequences necessary for the termination of transcription and for stabilizing the mRNA. Such sequences are commonly available from the 5′ and, occasionally 3′, untranslated regions of eukaryotic or viral DNAs or cDNAs. These regions contain nucleotide segments transcribed as polyadenylated fragments in the untranslated portion of the mRNA encoding the multivalent antibody. One useful transcription termination component is the bovine growth hormone polyadenylation region. See PCT Publication No. WO 94/11026 and the expression vector disclosed therein.


The recombinant DNA can also include any type of protein tag sequence that may be useful for purifying the protein. Examples of protein tags include but are not limited to a histidine tag, a FLAG tag, a myc tag, an HA tag, or a GST tag. Appropriate cloning and expression vectors for use with bacterial, fungal, yeast, and mammalian cellular hosts can be found in Cloning Vectors: A Laboratory Manual, (Elsevier, New York, 1985), the relevant disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.


The expression construct is introduced into the host cell using a method appropriate to the host cell, as will be apparent to one of skill in the art. A variety of methods for introducing nucleic acids into host cells are known in the art, including, but not limited to, electroporation; transfection employing calcium chloride, rubidium chloride, calcium phosphate, DEAE-dextran, or other substances; microprojectile bombardment; lipofection; and infection (where the vector is an infectious agent).


Suitable host cells include prokaryotes, yeast, mammalian cells, or bacterial cells. Suitable bacteria include gram negative or gram positive organisms, for example, E. coli or Bacillus spp. Yeast, preferably from the Saccharomyces species, such as S. cerevisiae, may also be used for production of polypeptides. Various mammalian or insect cell culture systems can also be employed to express recombinant proteins. Baculovirus systems for production of heterologous proteins in insect cells are reviewed by Luckow and Summers, (Bio/Technology, 6:47, 1988). In some instance it will be desired to produce proteins in vertebrate cells, such as for glycosylation, and the propagation of vertebrate cells in culture (tissue culture) has become a routine procedure. Examples of suitable mammalian host cell lines include endothelial cells, COS-7 monkey kidney cells, CV-1, L cells, C127, 3T3, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO), human embryonic kidney cells, HeLa, 293, 293T, and BHK cell lines. For many applications, the small size of the protein multimers described herein would make E. coli the preferred method for expression.


Protein Production


Host cells are transformed with the herein-described expression or cloning vectors for protein production and cultured in conventional nutrient media modified as appropriate for inducing promoters, selecting transformants, or amplifying the genes encoding the desired sequences.


The host cells used to produce the proteins of this invention may be cultured in a variety of media. Commercially available media such as Ham's F10 (Sigma), Minimal Essential Medium ((MEM), Sigma), RPMI-1640 (Sigma), and Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium ((DMEM), Sigma) are suitable for culturing the host cells. In addition, any of the media described in Ham et al., Meth. Enz. 58:44 (1979), Barnes et al., Anal. Biochem. 102:255 (1980), U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,767,704; 4,657,866; 4,927,762; 4,560,655; or 5,122,469; WO 90/03430; WO 87/00195; or U.S. Pat. No. Re. 30,985 may be used as culture media for the host cells. Any of these media may be supplemented as necessary with hormones and/or other growth factors (such as insulin, transferrin, or epidermal growth factor), salts (such as sodium chloride, calcium, magnesium, and phosphate), buffers (such as HEPES), nucleotides (such as adenosine and thymidine), antibiotics (such as GENTAMYCIN™ drug), trace elements (defined as inorganic compounds usually present at final concentrations in the micromolar range), and glucose or an equivalent energy source. Any other necessary supplements may also be included at appropriate concentrations that would be known to those skilled in the art. The culture conditions, such as temperature, pH, and the like, are those previously used with the host cell selected for expression, and will be apparent to the ordinarily skilled artisan.


Proteins disclosed herein can also be produced using cell-translation systems. For such purposes, the nucleic acids encoding the proteins must be modified to allow in vitro transcription to produce mRNA and to allow cell-free translation of the mRNA in the particular cell-free system being utilized. Exemplary eukaryotic cell-free translation systems include, for example, mammalian or yeast cell-free translation systems, and exemplary prokaryotic cell-free translation systems include, for example, bacterial cell-free translation systems.


Proteins disclosed herein can also be produced by chemical synthesis (e.g., by the methods described in Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis, 2nd ed., 1984, The Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, Ill.). Modifications to the protein can also be produced by chemical synthesis.


The proteins disclosed herein can be purified by isolation/purification methods for proteins generally known in the field of protein chemistry. Non-limiting examples include extraction, recrystallization, salting out (e.g., with ammonium sulfate or sodium sulfate), centrifugation, dialysis, ultrafiltration, adsorption chromatography, ion exchange chromatography, hydrophobic chromatography, normal phase chromatography, reversed-phase chromatography, gel filtration, gel permeation chromatography, affinity chromatography, electrophoresis, countercurrent distribution or any combinations of these. After purification, proteins may be exchanged into different buffers and/or concentrated by any of a variety of methods known to the art, including, but not limited to, filtration and dialysis.


The purified proteins are preferably at least 85% pure, more preferably at least 95% pure, and most preferably at least 98% pure. Regardless of the exact numerical value of the purity, the proteins are sufficiently pure for use as a pharmaceutical product.


Imaging, Diagnostic and Other Applications


The E binders described herein can be detectably labeled and used to contact cells expressing EGFR for imaging or diagnostic applications. The E/I binders described herein can be detectably labeled and used to contact cells expressing EGFR and/or IGFIR for imaging or diagnostic applications. Any method known in the art for conjugating a protein to the detectable moiety may be employed, including those methods described by Hunter, et al., Nature 144:945 (1962); David, et al., Biochemistry 13:1014 (1974); Pain, et al., J. Immunol. Meth. 40:219 (1981); and Nygren, J. Histochem. and Cytochem. 30:407 (1982).


In certain embodiments, the E binders and E/I binders described herein are further attached to a label that is able to be detected (e.g., the label can be a radioisotope, fluorescent compound, enzyme or enzyme co-factor). The label may be a radioactive agent, such as: radioactive heavy metals such as iron chelates, radioactive chelates of gadolinium or manganese, positron emitters of oxygen, nitrogen, iron, carbon, or gallium, 43K, 52Fe, 57Co, 67Cu, 67Ga, 68Ga, 123I, 125I, 131I, 132I, or 99Tc. An E binder or E/I binder affixed to such a moiety may be used as an imaging agent and is administered in an amount effective for diagnostic use in a mammal such as a human and the localization and accumulation of the imaging agent is then detected. The localization and accumulation of the imaging agent may be detected by radioscintigraphy, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography or positron emission tomography. As will be evident to the skilled artisan, the amount of radioisotope to be administered is dependent upon the radioisotope. Those having ordinary skill in the art can readily formulate the amount of the imaging agent to be administered based upon the specific activity and energy of a given radionuclide used as the active moiety.


E binders and E/I binders also are useful as affinity purification agents. In this process, the proteins are immobilized on a suitable support, such a Sephadex resin or filter paper, using methods well known in the art. The proteins can be employed in any known assay method, such as competitive binding assays, direct and indirect sandwich assays, and immunoprecipitation assays (Zola, Monoclonal Antibodies: A Manual of Techniques, pp. 147-158 (CRC Press, Inc., 1987)).


E binders are useful in methods for detecting EGFR in a sample. E/I binders also are useful in methods for detecting EGFR and/or IGFIR in a sample. The sample will often by a biological sample, such as a biopsy, and particularly a biopsy of a tumor, a suspected tumor. The sample may be from a human or other mammal. The E binder or E/I binder may be labeled with a labeling moiety, such as a radioactive moiety, a fluorescent moiety, a chromogenic moiety, a chemiluminescent moiety, or a hapten moiety; and may be immobilized on a solid support. Detection may be carried out using any technique known in the art, such as, for example, radiography, immunological assay, fluorescence detection, mass spectroscopy, or surface plasmon resonance.


Therapeutic/In Vivo Uses


The E binders described herein are also useful in methods for treating conditions which respond to an inhibition of EGFR biological activity. The E/I binders described herein are also useful in methods for treating conditions which respond to an inhibition of EGFR and/or IGFIR biological activity. EGFR and IGFIR are involved either directly or indirectly in the signal transduction pathways of various cell activities, including proliferation, adhesion and migration, as well as differentiation.


In one aspect, the application provides methods for treating a subject afflicted with a hyperproliferative disorder with a therapeutically effective amount of an E binder or an E/I binder. In particular, E binders and E/I binders are useful for the treatment and/or prophylaxis of tumors and/or tumor metastases. In exemplary embodiments, the E/I binder is an antibody-like protein multimer such as a dimer of an EGFR binding 10Fn3 and an IGFIR binding 10Fn3.


In some embodiments, pharmaceutical compositions comprising E binders or E/I binders are administered to a subject afflicted with a tumor, including but not limited to, a brain tumor, tumor of the urogenital tract, tumor of the lymphatic system, stomach tumor, laryngeal tumor, monocytic leukemia, lung adenocarcinoma, small-cell lung carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, glioblastoma and breast carcinoma; or a cancerous disease, including but not limited to, squamous cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, stomach cancer, liver cancer, kidney cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, head cancer, neck cancer, oesophageal cancer, gynecological cancer, thyroid cancer, lymphoma, chronic leukemia and acute leukemia.


An E binder or an E/I binder can be administered alone or in combination with one or more additional therapies such as chemotherapy radiotherapy, immunotherapy, surgical intervention, or any combination of these. Long-term therapy is equally possible as is adjuvant therapy in the context of other treatment strategies, as described herein. Techniques and dosages for administration vary depending on the type of specific polypeptide and the specific condition being treated but can be readily determined by the skilled artisan.


Additional Agents that May be Used with E/I Binders


One aspect of the application provides combinations of E binder or E/I binders and an additional therapeutic agent, such as a cytotoxic agent. In some embodiments, an E binder or E/I binder is linked to a cytotoxic agent. Such embodiments can be prepared by in vitro or in vivo methods as appropriate. In vitro methods include conjugation chemistry well know in the art, such as conjugation to cysteine and lysine residues. In order to link a cytotoxic agent to a polypeptide, a linking group or reactive group is used. Suitable linking groups are well known in the art and include disulfide groups, thioether groups, acid labile groups, photolabile groups, peptidase labile groups and esterase labile groups. Cytotoxic agents can also be linked to E binders or E/I binders through an intermediary carrier molecule such as serum albumin


Exemplary cytotoxic agents that may be linked to E binders or E/I binders, include maytansinoids, taxanes, analogs of CC-1065, bacterial toxin, plant toxin, ricin, abrin, a ribonuclease (RNase), DNase I, a protease, Staphylococcal enterotoxin-A, pokeweed antiviral protein, gelonin, diphtherin toxin, Pseudomonas exotoxin, Pseudomonas endotoxin, Ranpimase (Rap), Rap (N69Q), methotrexate, daunorubicin, doxorubicin, vincristine, vinblastine, melphalan, mitomycin C, chlorambucil, and calicheamicin.


In other therapeutic treatments or compositions, E binders or E/I binders are co-administered, or administered sequentially, with one or more additional therapeutic agents. Suitable therapeutic agents include, but are not limited to, cytotoxic or cytostatic agents, such as cancer therapeutic agents.


Cancer therapeutic agents are those agents that seek to kill or limit the growth of cancer cells while having minimal effects on the patient. Thus, such agents may exploit any difference in cancer cell properties (e.g., metabolism, vascularization or cell-surface antigen presentation) from healthy host cells. Therapeutic agents that can be combined with E/I binders for improved anti-cancer efficacy include diverse agents used in oncology practice (Reference: Cancer, Principles & Practice of Oncology, DeVita, V. T., Hellman, S., Rosenberg, S. A., 6th edition, Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 2001), such as doxorubicin, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, trastuzumab, capecitabine, tamoxifen, toremifene, letrozole, anastrozole, fulvestrant, exemestane, goserelin, oxaliplatin, carboplatin, cisplatin, dexamethasone, antide, bevacizumab, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, levamisole, irinotecan, etoposide, topotecan, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, estramustine, mitoxantrone, abarelix, zoledronate, streptozocin, rituximab, idarubicin, busulfan, chlorambucil, fludarabine, imatinib, cytarabine, ibritumomab, tositumomab, interferon alpha-2b, melphalam, bortezomib, altretamine, asparaginase, gefitinib, erlonitib, anti-EGF receptor antibody (e.g., cetuximab or panitumab), ixabepilone, epothilones or derivatives thereof, platinum agents (such as carboplatin, oxaliplatin, cisplatin), taxanes (such as paclitaxel, docetaxel), and camptothecin.


Therapeutic Formulations and Modes of Administration


The present application provides methods for treating conditions which respond to an inhibition of EGFR and/or IGFIR biological activity. Techniques and dosages for administration vary depending on the type of specific polypeptide and the specific condition being treated but can be readily determined by the skilled artisan. In general, regulatory agencies require that a protein reagent to be used as a therapeutic is formulated so as to have acceptably low levels of pyrogens. Accordingly, therapeutic formulations will generally be distinguished from other formulations in that they are substantially pyrogen free, or at least contain no more than acceptable levels of pyrogen as determined by the appropriate regulatory agency (e.g., FDA).


In some embodiments, the E binders and E/I binders are pharmaceutically acceptable to a mammal, in particular a human. A “pharmaceutically acceptable” polypeptide refers to a polypeptide that is administered to an animal without significant adverse medical consequences. Examples of pharmaceutically acceptable E binders and E/I binders include 10Fn3 domains that lack the integrin-binding domain (RGD) and 10Fn3 domains that are essentially endotoxin free or have very low endotoxin levels.


Therapeutic compositions may be administered with a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent, carrier, or excipient, in unit dosage form. Administration may be parenteral (e.g., intravenous, subcutaneous), oral, or topical, as non-limiting examples. In addition, any gene therapy technique using nucleic acids encoding E binders or E/I binders, may be employed, such as naked DNA delivery, recombinant genes and vectors, cell-based delivery, including ex vivo manipulation of patients' cells, and the like.


The composition can be in the form of a pill, tablet, capsule, liquid, or sustained release tablet for oral administration; a liquid for intravenous, subcutaneous or parenteral administration; or a gel, lotion, ointment, cream, or a polymer or other sustained release vehicle for local administration.


Methods well known in the art for making formulations are found, for example, in “Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy” (20th ed., ed. A. R. Gennaro A R., 2000, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa.). Formulations for parenteral administration may, for example, contain excipients, sterile water, saline, polyalkylene glycols such as polyethylene glycol, oils of vegetable origin, or hydrogenated napthalenes. Biocompatible, biodegradable lactide polymer, lactide/glycolide copolymer, or polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymers may be used to control the release of the compounds. Nanoparticulate formulations (e.g., biodegradable nanoparticles, solid lipid nanoparticles, liposomes) may be used to control the biodistribution of the compounds. Other potentially useful parenteral delivery systems include ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer particles, osmotic pumps, implantable infusion systems, and liposomes. The concentration of the compound in the formulation varies depending upon a number of factors, including the dosage of the drug to be administered, and the route of administration.


The polypeptide may be optionally administered as a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, such as non-toxic acid addition salts or metal complexes that are commonly used in the pharmaceutical industry. Examples of acid addition salts include organic acids such as acetic, lactic, pamoic, maleic, citric, malic, ascorbic, succinic, benzoic, palmitic, suberic, salicylic, tartaric, methanesulfonic, toluenesulfonic, or trifluoroacetic acids or the like; polymeric acids such as tannic acid, carboxymethyl cellulose, or the like; and inorganic acid such as hydrochloric acid, hydrobromic acid, sulfuric acid phosphoric acid, or the like. Metal complexes include zinc, iron, and the like. In one example, the polypeptide is formulated in the presence of sodium acetate to increase thermal stability.


Formulations for oral use include tablets containing the active ingredient(s) in a mixture with non-toxic pharmaceutically acceptable excipients. These excipients may be, for example, inert diluents or fillers (e.g., sucrose and sorbitol), lubricating agents, glidants, and anti-adhesives (e.g., magnesium stearate, zinc stearate, stearic acid, silicas, hydrogenated vegetable oils, or talc).


Formulations for oral use may also be provided as chewable tablets, or as hard gelatin capsules wherein the active ingredient is mixed with an inert solid diluent, or as soft gelatin capsules wherein the active ingredient is mixed with water or an oil medium.


A therapeutically effective dose refers to a dose that produces the therapeutic effects for which it is administered. The exact dose will depend on the disorder to be treated, and may be ascertained by one skilled in the art using known techniques. In general, the E binder or E/I binder is administered at about 0.01 μg/kg to about 50 mg/kg per day, preferably 0.01 mg/kg to about 30 mg/kg per day, most preferably 0.1 mg/kg to about 20 mg/kg per day. The polypeptide may be given daily (e.g., once, twice, three times, or four times daily) or less frequently (e.g., once every other day, once or twice weekly, or monthly). In addition, as is known in the art, adjustments for age as well as the body weight, general health, sex, diet, time of administration, drug interaction, and the severity of the disease may be necessary, and will be ascertainable with routine experimentation by those skilled in the art.


EXEMPLIFICATION

The invention now being generally described will be more readily understood by reference to the following examples which are included merely for purposes of illustration of certain aspects and embodiments of the present invention, and are not intended to limit the invention in any way.


Summary of Sequences


Many of the sequences referenced in this application are summarized in the table below. Unless otherwise specified, N-terminal extensions are indicated with a single underline, C-terminal tails are indicated with a double underline, and linker sequences are indicated in bold.














SEQ




ID NO:
Description
Sequence







  1
WT human 10Fn3 domain
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDAPAVTVRYYRITY




GETGGNSPVQEFTVPGSKSTATISGLKPGVDYTITV




YAVTGRGDSPASSKPISINYRT





  2
Variant human 10Fn3 with the
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDAPAVTVRYYRITY



integrin binding motif removed
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPGSKSTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



(RGD changed to SGE; changes
YAVTGSGESPASSKPISINYRT



from SEQ ID NO: 1 are




underlined)






  3
I1 IRG-IR monomer with N-terminal

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITY




extension (N + 8) and no tail
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITV




YAVTRFRDYQPISINYRT





  4
I1 IGF-IR monomer with N-terminal

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




extension (N + 10) and Ser tail
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



with His tag
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKPSQHHHHHH





  5
E2 EGFR monomer with N-terminal

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDSGRGSYQYYRITY




extension (N + 8) and no tail
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPGPVHTATISGLKPGVDYTITV




YAVTDHKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRT





  6
E2 EGFR monomer with N-terminal

MGVSGVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDSGRGSYQYYRI




extension (N + 10) and Ser tail
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGPVHTATISGLKPGVDYTI



with his tag
TVYAVTDHKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTEIDKPSQ




HHHHHH





  7
E1 EGFR monomer with N-terminal

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWVAGAEDYQYYRITY




extension (N + 8) and no tail
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLVTATISGLKPGVDYTITV




YAVTDMMHVEYTEHPISINYRT





  8
E1 EGFR monomer with N-terminal

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWVAGAEDYQYYRI




extension (N + 10) and Ser tail
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLVTATISGLKPGVDYTI



with his tag
TVYAVTDMMHVEYTEHPISINYRTEIDKPSQHHHHH




H





  9
Ser tail
EIDKPSQ





 10
Cys tail
EIDKPCQ





 11
(GS)10 Linker
GSGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGS





 12
Fn Based Linker
PSTSTST





 13
(GS)5 Linker
GSGSGSGSGS





 14
(GGGGS)3 Linker
GGGGS GGGGS GGGGS





 15
(GGGGS)4 Linker
GGGGS GGGGS GGGGS GGGGS





 16
(GGGGS)5 Linker
GGGGS GGGGS GGGGS GGGGS GGGGS





 17
G4SG4SG3SG Linker
GGGGS GGGGS GGGSG





 18
Linker
GPGPGPG





 19
Linker
GPGPGPGPGPG





 20
I1-GS10-E2: I/E tandem having

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITY




I1 (with N-terminal extension
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



(N + 8) and short tail) fused via
YAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGSGS



GS10 linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO:

GSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDSGRGSYQ




11) to E2 (with N-terminal
YYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGPVHTATISGLKGPV



extension (N + 8) and no tail)
DYTITVYAVTDHKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRT





 21
I1-GS10-E2: I/E tandem having

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




I1 (with N-terminal extension
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



(N + 10) and short tail) fused
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGS



via GS10 linker (GS10 is SEQ ID

GSGSGSGS
VSVDPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDSGRGS




NO: 11) to E2 (with N-terminal
YQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGPVHTATISGLKP



extension (N + 8) and Ser tail)
GVDYTITVYAVTDHKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTE





IDKPSQ






 22
I1-GS10-E2: I/E tandem I1 (with

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




N-terminal extension (N + 10)
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



and short tail) fused via GS10
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDSGRGS




E2 (with N-terminal extension
YQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGPVHTATISGLKP



(N + 8) and Ser tail with his tag)
GVDYTITVYAVTDHKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTE





IDKPSQHHHHHH






 23
E2-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having E2

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDSGRGSYQYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEDTVPGPVHTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and short tail) fused via GS10
YAVTDHKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTEIDKGSGSG



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

SGSGSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLIS




I1 (with N-terminal extension
WSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTA



(N + 8) and Ser tail)
TISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEID





KPSQ






 24
E2-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having E2

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDSGRGSYQYYRI




(with N-terminal extension (N +
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGPVHTATISGLKPGVDYTI



10) and short tail) fused via GS10
TVYAVTDHKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTEIDKGSG



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

SGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLL




I1 (with N-terminal extension
ISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVY



(N + 8) and Ser tail)
TATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTE





IDKPSQ






 25
E2-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having E2

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDSGRGSYQYYRI




(with N-terminal extension (N +
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGPVIITATISGLKPGVDYT



10) and short tail) fused via GS10
ITVYAVTDHKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTEIDKGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSL




I1 (with N-terminal extension
LISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNV



(N + 8) and Ser tail with his tag)
YTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRT





EIDKPSQHHHHHH






 26
I1-GS10-E1: I/E tandem having I1

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and short tail) fused via GS10
YAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWVAGAEDYQ




E1 (with N-terminal extension
YYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLVTATISGLKPGV



(N + 8) and no tail)
DYTITVYAVTDMMHVEYTEHPISINYRT





 27
I1-GS10-E1: I/E tandem having I1

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




(with N-terminal extenxion (N +
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



10) and short tail) fused via GS10
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWVAGAED




E1 (with N-terminal extension
YQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLVTATISGLKP



(N + 8) and Ser tail)
GVDYTITVYAVTDMMHVEYTEHPISINYRTEIDKPS





Q






 28
I1-GS10-E1: I/E tandem having I1

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




(with N-terminal extension (N +
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



10) and short tail) fused via GS10
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWVAGAED




E1 (with N-terminal extension
YQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLVTATISGLKP



(N + 8) and Ser tail with his tag)
GVDYTITVYAVTDMMHVEYTEHPISINYRTEIDKPS





QHHHHHH






 29
E1-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having E1

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWVAGAEDYQYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLVTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and short tail) fused via GS10
YAVTDMMHVEYTEHPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARL




I1 (with N-terminal extension
KVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGL



(N + 8) and no tail)
KPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRT





 30
E1-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having E1

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWVAGAEDYQYYRI




(with N-terminal extension (N +
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLVTATISGLKPGVDYTI



10) and short tail) fused via GS10
TVYAVTDMMHVEYTEHPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSA




I1 (with N-terminal extension
RLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATIS



(N + 8) and Ser tail)
GLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKPS





Q






 31
E1-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having E1

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWVAGAEDYQYYRI




(with N-terminal extension (N +
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLVTATISGLKPGVDYTI



10) and short tail) fused via GS10
TVYAVTDMMHVEYTEHPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSA




I1 (with N-terminal extension
RLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATIS



(N + 8) and Ser tail with his tag)
GLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKPS





QHHHHHH






 32

10Fn3 scaffold, wherein the BC,

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLI(X)nYYRITYGETGG



DE, and FG loops are represented
NSPVQEFTV(X)oATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAV(X)p



by (X)n, (X)o, and (X)p,
ISINYRT



respectively, and n is an integer




from 1-20, o is an integer from




1-20, and p is an integer from




1-40






 33
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
SWVAGAEDYQ



E1






 34
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
XmVAGAEDYQXn



E1, wherein X is any amino acid




and m and n are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






 35
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
PHDLVT



E1






 36
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
XoHDLVXp



E1, wherein X is any amino acid




and o and p are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






 37
FG loop sequence from EGFR binder
TDMMHVEYTEHP



E1






 38
FG loop sequence from EGFR binder
XqDMMHVEYTEHXr



E1, wherein X is any amino acid




and q and r are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






 39
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
SWDSGRGSYQ



E2






 40
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
XgDSGRGSYQXh



E2, wherein X is any amino acid




and g and h are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






 41
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
PGPVHT



E2






 42
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
XiGPVHXj



E2, wherein X is any amino acid




and i and j are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






 43
FG loop sequence from EGFR binder
TDHKPHADGPHTYHESP



E2






 44
FG loop sequence from EGFR binder
XkDHKPADGPHTYHEXl



E2, wherein X is any amino acid




and k and l are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






 45
BC loop sequence from IGF-IR
SWSARLKVAR



binder I1






 46
BC loop sequence from IGF-IR
XaSARLKVAXb



binder I1, wherein X is any amino




acid and a and b are independ-




ently selected from 0 to 5 amino




acids






 47
DE loop sequence from IGF-IR
PKNVYT



binder I1






 48
DE loop sequence from IGF-IR
XcKNVYXd



binder I1, wherein X is any amino




acid and c and d are independ-




ently selected from 0 to 5 amino




acids






 49
FG loop sequence from IGF-IR
TRFRDYQP



binder I1






 50
FG loop sequence from IGF-IR
XeRFRDYQXf



binder I1, wherein X is any amino




acid and e and f are independ-




ently selected from 0 to 5 amino




acids






 51
Linker
GPG





 52
E3 EGFR monomer with N-terminal

MGVSDVRPDLEVVAATPTSLLISWLPGKLRYQYYRI




extension (N + 10), Ser tail and
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLRTATISGLKPGVDYTI



his tag
TVYAVTNMMHVEYSEYPISINYRTEIDKPSQHHHHH




H





 53
E3-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having E3

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWLPGKLRYQYYRI




(with N-terminal extension (N +
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLRTATISGLKPGVDYTI



10) and short tail) fused via GS10
TVYAVTNMMHVEYSEYPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSA




I1 (with N-terminal extension
RLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATIS



(N + 8) and Cys tail with his tag)
GLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKPC





QHHHHHH






 54
I1-GS10-E3: I/E tandem having I1

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




with N-terminal extension (N + 10)
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



and short tail) fused via GS10
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWLPGKLR




E3 (with N-terminal extension
YQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLRTATISGLKP



(N + 8) and Cys tail with his tag)
GVDYTITVYAVTNMMHVEYSEYPISINYRTEIDKPC





QHHHHHH






 55
E1-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having E1

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWVAGAEDYQYYRI




(with N-terminal extension (N +
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLVTATISGLKPGVDYTI



10) and short tail) fused via GS10
TVYAVTDMMHVEYTEHPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSA




I1 (with N-terminal extension
RLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATIS



(N + 8) and Cys tail with his tag)
GLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKPC





QHHHHHH






 56
E2-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having E2

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDSGRGSYQYYRI




(with N-terminal extension (N +
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGPVHTATISGLKPGVDYTI



10) and short tail) fused via GS10
TVYAVTDHKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTEIDKGSG



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

SGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLL




I1 (with N-terminal extension
ISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVY



(N + 8) and Cys tail with his tag)
TATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTE





IDKPCQHHHHHH






 57
I1-GS10-E1: I/E tandem having I1

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




(with N-terminal extension (N +
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



10) and short tail) fused via GS10
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWVAGAED




E1 (with N-terminal extension
YQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLVTATISGLKP



(N + 8) and Cys tail with his tag)
GVDYTITVYAVTDMMHVEYTEHPISINYRTEIDKPC





QHHHHHH






 58
I1-GS10-E2: I/E tandem having I1

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




(with N-terminal extension (N +
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



10) and short tail) fused via GS10
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDSGRGS




E2 (with N-terminal extension
YQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGPVHTATISGLKP



(N + 8) and Cys tail with his tag)
GVDYTITVYAVTDHKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTE





IDKPCQHHHHHH






 59
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
SWLPGKLRYQ



E3






 60
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
XsLPGKLRYQXt



E3, wherein X is any amino acid




and s and t are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






 61
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
PHDLRT



E3






 62
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
XuHDLRXw



E3, wherein X is any amino acid




and u and w are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






 63
FG loop sequence from EGFR binder
TNMMHVEYSEYP



E3






 64
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
XyNMMHVEYSEYXz



E3, wherein X is any amino acid




and y and z are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






 65
I1 IGF-IR monomer core sequence:
EVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSP



I1 without N-terminal extension
VQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRD



or C-terminal tail
YQPISINYRT





 66
E1 EGFR monomer core sequence: E1
EVVAATPTSLLISWVAGAEDYQYYRITYGETGGNSP



without N-terminal extension or
VQEFTVPHDLVTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDMMH



C-terminal tail
VEYTEHPISINYRT





 67
E2 EGFR monomer core sequence: E2
EVVAATPTSLLISWDSGRGSYQYYRITYGETGGNSP



without N-terminal extension or
VQEFTVPGPVHTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDHKP



C-terminal tail
HADGPHTYHESPISINYRT





 68
E3 EGFR monomer core sequence:
EVVAATPTSLLISWLPGKLRYQYYRITYGETGGNSP



SEQ ID NO: 82 without N-terminal
VQEFTVPHDLRTATISLGKPGVDYTITVYAVTNMMH



extension or C-terminal tail
VEYSEYPISINYRT





 69
Exemplary N-terminal extension
MGVSDVPRDL



(N + 10)






 70
Exemplary N-terminal extension
GVSDVPRDL





 71
Exemplary N-terminal extension
VSDVPRDL



(N + 8)






 72
Exemplary N-terminal extension,
XnSDVPRDL



wherein X is any amino acid and





n is 0, 1 or 2, preferably when





n = 1, X is Met or Gly and when




n = 2, X is Met-Gly






 73
Exemplary N-terminal extension,
XnDVPRDL



wherein X is any amino acid and





n is 0, 1 or 2, preferably when





n = 1, X is Met or Gly and when




n = 2, X is Met-Gly






 74
Exemplary N-terminal extension,
XnVPRDL



wherein X is any amino acid and





n is 0, 1 or 2, preferably when





n = 1, X is Met or Gly and when




n = 2, X is Met-Gly






 75
Exemplary N-terminal extension,
XnPRDL



wherein X is any amino acid and





n is 0, 1 or 2, preferably when





n = 1, X is Met or Gly and when




n = 2, X is Met-Gly






 76
Exemplary N-terminal extension,
XnRDL



wherein X is any amino acid and





n is 0, 1 or 2, preferably when





n = 1, X is Met or Gly and when




n = 2, X is Met-Gly






 77
Exemplary N-terminal extension,
XnDL



wherein X is any amino acid and





n is 0, 1 or 2, preferably when





n = 1, X is Met or Gly and when




n = 2, X is Met-Gly






 78
Short tail
EIDK





 79
Exemplary C-terminal tail
EIDKP





 80
Exemplary C-terminal tail
EIDKPS





 81
Exemplary C-terminal tail
EIDKPC





 82
E3 EGFR monomer with N-terminal

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWLPGKLRYQYYRITY




extension (N + 8) and no tail
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLRTATISGLKPGVDYTITV




YAVTNMMHVEYSEYPISINYRT





 87
E3-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having E3

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWLPGKLRYQYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLRTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and short tail) fused via GS10
YAVTNMMHVEYSEYPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARL




I1 (with N-terminal extension
KVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGL



(N + 8) and Cys tail)
KPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKPCQ





 88
I1-GS10-E3: I/E tandem having I1

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and short tail) fused via GS10
YAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWLPGKLRYQ




E3 (with N-terminal extension
YYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLRTATISGLKPGV



(N + 8) and Cys tail)
DYTITVYAVTNMMHVEYSEYPISINYRTEIDKPCQ





 89
I1-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having E1

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWVAGAEDYQYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPDHLVTATISLGKPGVDYTITV



8) and short tail) fused via GS10
YAVTDMMHVEYTEHPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARL




I1 (with N-terminal extension
KVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGL



(N + 8) and Cys tail)
KPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKPCQ





 90
E2-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having E2

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDSGRGSYQYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPGPVHTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and short tail) fused via GS10
YAVTDHKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTEIDKGSGSG



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

SGSGSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLIS




I1 (with N-terminal extension
WSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTA



(N + 8) and Cys tail)
TISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEID





KPCQ






 91
I1-GS10-E1: I/E tandem having I1

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and short tail) fused via GS10
YAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWVAGAEDYQ




E1 (with N-terminal extension
YYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLVTATISGLKPGV



(N + 8) and Cys tail)
DYTITVYAVTDMMHVEYTEHPISINYRTEIDKPCQ





 92
I1-GS10-E2: I/E tandem having I1

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and short tail) fused via GS10
YAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDSGRGSYQ




E2 (with N-terminal extension
YYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGPVHTATISGLKPGV



(N + 8) and Cys tail)
DYTITVYAVTDHKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTEID





KPCQ






 93
PA3 Linker
PAPAPA





 94
PA6 Linker
PAPAPAPAPAPA





 95
PA9 Linker
PAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPA





 96
Modified Ser tail
EGSGS





 97
Modified Cys tail
EGSGC





 98
E3-(PA)n-I1: E/I tandem having E3

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWLPGKLRYQYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLRTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and an E tail) fused via (PA)n
YAVTNMMHVEYSEYPISINYRTE(PA)nVSDVPRDL



linker ((PA)n is SEQ ID NO: 488)
EVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNPS



to I1 (with N-terminal extension
VQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRD



(N + 8) and a modified Ser or Cys
YQPISINYRTEGSGX



tail), wherein n = 3, 6 or 9, and




X = Ser or Cys






 99
I1-(PA)n-E3: I/E tandem having I1

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and an E tail) fused via (PA)n
YAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTE(PA)nVSDVPRDLEVVA



linker ((PA)n is SEQ ID NO: 488)
ATPTSLLISWLPGKLRYQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEF



to E3 (with N-terminal extension
TVPHDLRTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTNMMHVEYS



(N + 8) and a modified Ser or Cys
EYPISINYRTEGSGX



tail), wherein n = 3, 6 or 9, and




X = Ser or Cys






100
E1-(PA)n-I1: E/I tandem having E1

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWVAGAEDYQYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPDHLVTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and an E tail) fused via (PA)n
YAVTDMMHVEYTEHPISINYRTE(PA)nVSDVPRDL



linker ((PA)n is SEQ ID NO: 488)
EVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSP



to I1 (with N-terminal extension
VQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRD



(N + 8) and a modified Ser or Cys
YQPISINYRTEGSGX



tail), wherein n = 3, 6 or 9, and




X = Ser or Cys






101
E2-(PA)n-I1: E/I tandem having E2

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDSGRGSYQYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPGPVHTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and an E tail) fused via (PA)n
YAVTDHKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTE(PA)nVSD



linker ((PA)n is SEQ ID NO: 488)

VPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGET




to I1 (with N-terminal extension
GGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAV



(N + 8) and a modified Ser or Cys
TRFRDYQPISINYRTEGSGX



tail), wherein n = 3, 6 or 9, and




X = Ser or Cys






102
I1-(PA)n-E1: I/E tandem having I1

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and an E tail) fused via (PA)n
YAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTE(PA)nVSDVPRDLEVVA



linker ((PA)n is SEQ ID NO: 488)
ATPTSLLISWVAGAEDYQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEF



to E1 (with N-terminal extension
TVPHDLVTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDMMHVEYT



(N + 8) and a modified Ser or Cys
EHPISINYRTEGSGX



tail), wherein n = 3, 6 or 9, and




X = Ser or Cys






103
I1-(PA)n-E2: I/E tandem having I1

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and an E tail) fused via (PA)n
YAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTE(PA)nVSDVPRDLEVVA



linker ((PA)n is SEQ ID NO: 488)
ATPTSLLISWDSGRGSYQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEF



to E2 (with N-terminal extension
TVPGPVHTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDHKPHADG



(N + 8) and a modified Ser or Cys
PHTYHESPISINYRTEGSGX



tail), wherein n = 3, 6 or 9, and




X = Ser or Cys






104
E3-GS10-E1: E/I tandem having E3

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWLPGKLRYQYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLRTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and short tail) fused via GS10
YAVTNMMHVEYSEYPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARL




I1 (with N-terminal extension
KVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGL



(N + 8) and Ser tail)
KPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKPSQ





105
I1-GS10-E3: I/E tandem having I1

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISLGKPGVDYTITV



8) and short tail) fused via GS10
YAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWLPGKLRYQ




E3 (with N-terminal extension
YYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPHDLRTATISGLKPGV



(N + 8) and Ser tail)
DYTITVYAVTNMMHVEYSEYPISINYRTEIDKPSQ





106
E4 EGFR monomer with N-terminal

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWHERDGSRQYYRITY




extension (N + 8) and no tail
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKPGVDYTITV




YAVTDYFNPTTHEYIYQTTPISINYRT





107
E4 EGFR monomer with N-terminal

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWHERDGSRQYYRI




extension (N + 10) and a Ser with
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKPGVDYTI



His tag
TVYAVTDYFNPTTHEYIYQTTPISINYRTEIDKPSQ




HHHHHH





108
E4 EGFR monomer core sequence: E4
EVVAATPTSLLISWHERDGSRQYYRITYGETGGNSP



without N-terminal extension or
VQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDYFN



C-terminal tail
PTTHEYIYQTTPISINYRT





109
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
SWHERDGSRQ



E4






110
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
PGGVRT



E4






111
FG loop sequence from EGFR binder
TDYFNPTTHEYIYQTTP



E4






112
E5 EGFR monomer with N-terminal

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWWAPVDRYQYYRITY




extension (N + 8) and no tail
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITV




YAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRT





113
E5 EGFR monomer with N-terminal

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWWAPVDRYQYYRI




extension (N + 10) and a modified
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



Ser or Cys tail, wherein X = Ser
TVYAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTEIDKPXQ



or Cys; may optionally comprise




a 6X His tag (SEQ ID NO: 487)






114
E5 EGFR monomer core sequence: E5
EVVAATPTSLLISWWAPVDRYQYYRITYGETGGNSP



without N-terminal extension or
VQEFTVPRDVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDYKP



C-terminal tail
HADGPHTYHESPISINYRT





115
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
SWWAPVDRYQ



E5






116
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
PRDVYT



E5






117
FG loop sequence from EGFR binder
TDYKPHADGPHTYHESP



E5






118
E4-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having E4

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWHERDGSRQYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and short tail) fused via GS10
YAVTDYFNPTTHEYIYQTTPISINYRTEIDKGSGSG



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

SGSGSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLIS




I1 (with N-terminal extension
WSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTA



(N + 8) and no tail)
TISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRT





119
E4-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having E4

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWHERDGSRQYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and short tail) fused via GS10
YAVTDYFNPTTHEYIYQTTPISINYRTEIDKGSGSG



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

SGSGSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLIS




I1 (with N-terminal extension
WSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTA



(N + 8) and modified Ser or Cys
TISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEID



tail), wherein X = Ser or Cys;

KPXQ




may optionally comprise a 6X His




tag (SEQ ID NO: 487)






120
E4-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having E4

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWHERDGSRQYYRI




(with N-terminal extension (N +
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKRTEIDKG



10) and short tail) fused via GS10

SGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTS




linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to
LLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKN



I1 (with N-terminal extension
VYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYR



(N + 8) and Cys tail) with his tag
TEIDKPCQHHHHHH





121
E4-(PA)n-I1: E/I tandem having E4

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWHERDGSRQYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and an E tail) fused via (PA)n
YAVTDYFNPTTHEYIYQTTPISINYRTE(PA)nVSD



linker ((PA)n is SEQ ID NO: 488)

VPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGET




to I1 (with N-terminal extension
GGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAV



(N + 8) and modified Ser or Cys
TRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKPCQHHHHHH



tail), wherein n = 3, 6 or 9, and




X = Ser or Cys; may optionally




comprise a 6X His tag




(SEQ ID NO: 487)






122
I1-GS10-E4: I/E tandem having I1

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and short tail) fused via GS10
YAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWHERDGSRQ




E4 (having N-terminal extension
YYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKPGV



(N + 8) and no tail)
DYTITVYAVTDYFNPTTHEYIYQTTPISINYRT





123
I1-GS10-E4: I/E tandem having I1

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and short tail) fused via GS10
YAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWHERDGSRQ




E4 (with N-terminal extension
YYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGVRTATISLGKPGV



(N + 8) and modified Ser or Cys
DYTITVYAVTDYFNPTTHEYIYQTTPISINYRTEID



tail), wherein X = Ser or Cys;

KPXQ




may optionally comprise a 6X His




tag (SEQ ID NO: 487)






124
I1-GS10-E4: I/E tandem having I1

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYR




(with N-terminal extension (N +
ITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDY



10) and short tail) fused via GS10
TITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSG



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

SGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWHE




E4 (with N-terminal extension
RDGSRQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGVRTATI



(N + 8) and a Cys tail) with his
SGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDYFNPTTHEYIYQTTPIS



tag
INYRTEIDKPCQHHHHHH





125
I1-(PA)n-E4: I/E tandem having I1

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRIT




(with N-terminal extension (N +
YGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



8) and an E tail) fused via (PA)n
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTE(PA)nVSDVPRDLE



linker ((PA)n is SEQ ID NO: 488)
VVAATPTSLLISWHERDGSRQYYRITYGETGGNSP



to E4 (with N-terminal extension
VQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDYF



(N + 8) and modified Ser or Cys
NPTTHEYIYQTTPISINYRTEIDKPXQ



tail), wherein n = 3, 6 or 9, and




X = Ser or Cys; may optionally




comprise a 6X His tag




(SEQ ID NO: 487)






126
E5-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having E5

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWWAPVDRYQYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and short tail) fused via GS10
YAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTEIDKGSGSG



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

SGSGSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLIS




I1 (with N-terminal extension
WSSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTNPKNVYT



(N + 8) and no tail)
ATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRT





127
E5-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having E5

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWWAPVDRYQYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and short tail) fused via GS10
YAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYREIDKGSGSG



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

SGSGSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLIS




I1 (with N-terminal extension
WSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTA



(N + 8) and modified Ser or Cys
TISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEID



tail), wherein X = Ser or Cys;

KPXQ




may optionally comprise a 6X His




tag (SEQ ID NO: 487)






128
E5-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having E5

MGVDSVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWWAPVDRYQYYRI




(with N-terminal extension (N +
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



10) and short tail) fused via GS10
TVYAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTEIDKGSG



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

SGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLL




I1 (with N-terminal extension
ISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPQEFTVPKNVYT



(N + 8) and a Cys tail), with a
ATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEI



His tag

DKPCQHHHHHH






129
E5-(PA)n-I1: E/I tandem having E5

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWWAPVDRYQYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and an E tail) fused via (PA)n
YAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTE(PA)nVSD



linker ((PA)n is SEQ ID NO: 488)

VPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGET




to I1 (with N-terminal extension
GGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAV



(N + 8) and modified Ser or Cys
TRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKPXQ



tail), wherein n = 3, 6 or 9, and




X = Ser or Cys; may be optionally




comprise a 6X His tag




(SEQ ID NO: 487)






130
I1-GS10-E5: I/E tandem having I1

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and short tail) fused via GS10
YAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGSGS



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

GSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWWAPVDRYQ




E5 (with N-terminal extension
YYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVYTATISGLKPGV



(N + 8) and no tail)
DYTITVYAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRT





131
I1-GS10-E5: I/E tandem having I1

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITY




(with N-terminal extension (N +
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



8) and short tail) fused via GS10
YAVTRFRDYQPSISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGSG



linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to

SGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWWAPVDRY




E5 (with N-terminal extension
QYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVYTATISGLKPG



(N + 8) and modified Ser or Cys
VDYTITVYAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTEI



tail), wherein X = Ser or Cys;

DKPXQ




may optionally comprise a 6X His




tag (SEQ ID NO: 487)






132
I1-GS10-E5: I/E tandem having I1

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




(with N-terminal extension (N +
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



10) and short tail) fused via
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGS



GS10 linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO:

GSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWWAPVDR




11) to E5 (with N-terminal
YQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVYTATISGLKP



extension (N + 8) and a Cys tail)
GVDYTITVYAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTE



with a His tag

IDKPCQHHHHHH






133
I1-(PA)n-E5: I/E tandem having I1

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




(with N-terminal extension (N +
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



8) and an E tail) fused via (PA)n
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTE(PA)nVSDVPRDLEV



linker ((PA)n is SEQ ID NO: 488)
VAATPTSLLISWWAPVDRYQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQ



to E5 (with N-terminal extension
EFTVPRDVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDYKPHA



(N + 8) and modified Ser or Cys
DGPHTYHESPISINYRTEIDKPXQ



tail), wherein n = 3, 6 or 9, and




X = Ser or Cys; may optionally




comprise a 6X His tag (SEQ ID




NO: 487)






134
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
XgHERDGSRQXh



E4, wherein X is any amino acid




and g and h are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






135
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
XiGGVRXj



E4, wherein X is any amino acid




and i and j are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






136
FG loop sequence from EGFR binder
XkDYFNPTTHEYIYQTTXl



E4, wherein X is any amino acid




and k and l are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






137
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
XgWAPVDRYQXh



E5, wherein X is any amino acid




and g and h are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






138
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
XiRDVYXj



E5, wherein X is any amino acid




and i and j are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






139
FG loop sequence from EGFR binder
XkDYKPHADGPHTYHESXl



E5, wherein X is any amino acid




and k and l are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






140
E85 EGFR monomer with N-terminal

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWTQGSTHYQYYRI




extension (N + 10) and Ser tail
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGMVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



with his tag
TVYAVTDYRDRSTHEYKYRTTPISINYRTEIDKPSQ




HHHHHH





141
E85 EGFR monomer core: E85
EVVAATPTSLLISWTQGSTHYQYYRITYGETGGNSP



monomer without N-terminal
VQEFTVPFGMVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDYF



extension or C-terminal tail
DRSTHEYKYRTTPISINYRT





142
E85 EGFR monomer, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWTQGSTHYQYYRITYGETGGN




selected from the group consist-
SPVQEFTVPGMVYTATISLGKPGVDYTITVYAVTDY



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77 and X2
FDRSTHEYKYRTTPISINYRTX2



is selected from the group




consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10,




or 78-81; in exemplary embodi-




ments, X1 is SEQ ID NO: 69 or 71




and X2 is SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10; may




optionally comprise a his tag






143
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
SWTQGSTHYQ



E85






144
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
PGMVYT



E85






145
FG loop sequence from EGFR binder
TDYFDRSTHEYKYRTTP



E85






146
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
XgTQGSTHYQXh



E85, wherein X is any amino acid




and g and h are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






147
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
XiGMVYXj



E85, wherein X is any amino acid




and i and j are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






148
FG loop sequence from EGFR binder
XkDYFDRSTHEYKYRTTXl



E85, wherein X is any amino acid




and k and l are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






149
E85-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWTQGSTHYQYYRI




E85 (with N-terminal extension
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGMVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



(N + 10) and a short tail) fused
TVYAVTDYFDRSTHEYKYRTTPISINYRTEIDKGSG



via GS10 linker (GS10 is SEQ ID

SGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLL




NO: 11) to I1 (with N-terminal
ISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVY



extension (N + 8) and Cys tail)
TATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTE



with a 6X His tag

IDKPCQHHHHHH




(SEQ ID NO: 487)






150
E85-GS10-I1 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWTQGSTHYQYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPGMVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDY



selected from the group consist-
FDRSTHEYKYRTTPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSG



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is

SGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLK




optional and when present is
VARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLK



selected from the group consist-
PGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is




SEQ ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is




SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10






151
E85-(PA)n-I1 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWTQGSTHYQYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPGMVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDY



selected from the group consist-
FDRSTHEYKYRTTPISINYRTE(PA)nVSDVPRDLE



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is
VVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPV



optional and when present is
QEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDY



selected from the group consist-
QPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is




SEQ ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is




SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10






152
I1-GS10-E85: I/E tandem having I1

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




(with N-terminal extension (N +
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISLGKPGVDYTI



10) and a short tail) fused via
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGS



GS10 linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO:

GSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWTQGSTH




11) to E85 (with N-terminal
YQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGMVYTATISGLKP



extension (N + 8) and Cys tail)
GVDYTITVYAVTDYFDRSTHEYKYRTTPISINYRTE



with a 6X His tag (SEQ ID NO:

IDKPCQHHHHHH




487)






153
I1-GS10-E85 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRF



selected from the group consist-
RDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGS



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWTQGSTHYQYYRITY




optional and when present is
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPGMVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



selected from the group consist-
YAVTDYFDRSTHEYKYRTTPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is




SEQ ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is




SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10






154
I1-(PA)n-E85 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRF



selected from the group consist-
RDYQPISINYRTE(PA)nVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSL



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is
LISWTQGSTHYQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGMV



optional and when present is
YTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDYFDRSTHEYKYRT



selected from the group consist-
TPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is




SEQ ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is




SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10






155
E90 EGFR monomer with N-terminal

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWYWEGLPYQYYRI




extension (N + 10) and Ser tail
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVNTATISGLKPGVDYTI



with his tag
TVYAVTDWYNPDTHEYIYHTIPISINYRTEIDKPSQ




HHHHHH





156
E90 EGFR monomer core: E90
EVVAATPTSLLISWYWEGLPYQYYRITYGETGGNS



monomer without N-terminal
PVQEFTVPRDVNTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDW



extension or C-terminal tail
YNPDTHEYIYHTIPISINYRT





157
E90 EGFR monomer, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWYWEGLPYQYYRITYGETGG




selected from the group consist-
NSPVQEFTVPRDVNTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVT



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77 and X2
DWYNPDTHEYIYHTIPISINYRTX2



is selected from the group




consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10,




or 78-81; in exemplary embodi-




ments, X1 is SEQ ID NO: 69 or 71




and X2 is SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10; may




optionally comprise a his tag






158
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
SWYWEGLPYQ



E90






159
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
PRDVNT



E90






160
FG loop sequence from EGFR binder
TDWYNPDTHEYIYHTIP



E90






161
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
XgYWEGLPYQXh



E90, wherein X is any amino acid




and g and h are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






162
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
XiRDVNXj



E90, wherein X is any amino acid




and i and j are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






163
FG loop sequence from EGFR binder
XkDWYNPDTHEYIYHTIXl



E90, wherein X is any amino acid




and k and l are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






164
E90-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWYWEGLPYQYYRI




E90 (with N-terminal extension
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVNTATISGLKPGVDYTI



(N + 10) and a short tail) fused
TVYAVTDWYNPDTHEYIYHTIPISINYRTEIDKGSG



via GS10 linker (GS10 is SEQ ID

SGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLL




NO: 11) to I1 (with N-terminal
ISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVY



extension (N + 8) and Cys tail)
TATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTE



with a 6X His tag (SEQ ID NO:

IDKPCQHHHHHH




487)






165
E90-GS10-I1 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWYWEGLPYQYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPRDVNTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDW



selected from the group consist-
YNPDTHEYIYHTIPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSG



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is

SGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLK




optional and when present is
VARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLK



selected from the group consist-
PGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is SEQ




ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is SEQ ID




NO: 9 or 10






166
E90-(PA)n-I1 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWYWEGLPYQYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPRDVNTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDW



selected from the group consist-
YNPDTHEYIYHTIPISINYRTE(PA)nVSDVPRDLE



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is
VVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPV



optional and when present is
QEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDY



selected from the group consist-
QPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is SEQ




ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is SEQ ID




NO: 9 or 10






167
I1-GS10-E90: I/E tandem having I1

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




(with N-terminal extension (N +
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



10) and a short tail) fused via
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGS



GS10 linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO:

GSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWYWEGLP




11) to E90 (with N-terminal
YQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVNTATISGLKP



extension (N + 8) and Cys tail)
GVDYTITVYAVTDWYNPDTHEYIYHTIPISINYRTE



with a 6X His tag (SEQ ID NO:

IDKPCQHHHHHH




487)






168
I1-GS10-E90 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRF



selected from the group consist-
RDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGS



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWYWEGLPYQYYRITY




optional and when present is
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVNTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



selected from the group consist-
YAVTDWYNPDTHEYIYHTIPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is SEQ




ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is SEQ ID




NO: 9 or 10






169
I1-(PA)n-E90 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRF



selected from the group consist-
RDYQPISINYRTE(PA)nVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSL



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is
LISWYWEGLPYQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDV



optional and when present is
NTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDWYNPDTHEYIYHT



selected from the group consist-
IPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is SEQ




ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is SEQ ID




NO: 9 or 10






170
E96 EGFR monomer with N-terminal

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWASNRGTYQYYRI




extension (N + 10) and Ser tail
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGVSTATISGLKPGVDYTI



with his tag
TVYAVTDAFNPTTHEYNYFTTPISINYRTEIDKPSQ




HHHHHH





171
E96 EGFR monomer core: E96
EVVAATPTSLLISWASNRGTYQYYRITYGETGGNSP



monomer without N-terminal
VQEFTVPGGVSTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDAFN



extension or C-terminal tail
PTTHEYNYFTTPISINYRT





172
E96 EGFR monomer, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWASNRGTYQYYRITYGETGGN




selected from the group consist-
SPVQEFTVPGGVVSTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTD



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77 and X2
AFNPTTHEYNYFTTPISINYRTX2



is selected from the group




consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10,




or 78-81; in exemplary emobid-




ments, X1 is SEQ ID NO: 69 or 71




and X2 is SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10; may




optionally comprise a his tag






173
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
SWASNRGTYQ



E96






174
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
PGGVST



E96






175
FG loop sequence from EGFR binder
TDAFNPTTHEYNYFTTP



E96






176
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
XgASNRGTYQXh



E96, wherein X is any amino acid




and g and h are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






177
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
XiGGVSXj



E96, wherein X is any amino acid




and i and j are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






178
FG loop sequence from EGFR binder
XkDAFNPTTHEYNYFTTXl



E96, wherein X is any amino acid




and k and l are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






179
E96-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWASNRGTYQYYRI




E96 (with N-terminal extension
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGVSTATISGLKPGVDYTI



(N + 10) and a short tail) fused
TVYAVTDAFNPTTHEYNYFTTPISINYRTEIDKGSG



via GS10 linker (GS10 is SEQ ID

SGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLL




NO: 11) to I1 (with N-terminal
ISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVY



extension (N + 8) and Cys tail)
TATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTE



with a 6X His tag (SEQ ID NO:

IDKPCQHHHHHH




487)






180
E96-GS10-I1 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWASNRGTYQYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPGGVSTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDA



selected from the group consist-
FNPTTHEYNYFTTPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSG



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is

SGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLK




optional and when present is
VARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLK



selected from the group consist-
PGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is SEQ




ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is SEQ ID




NO: 9 or 10






181
E96-(PA)n-I1 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWASNRGTYQYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPGGVSTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDA



selected from the group consist-
FNPTTHEYNYFTTPISINYRTE(PA)nVSDVPRDLE



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is
VVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPV



optional and when present is
QEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDY



selected from the group consist-
QPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is SEQ




ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is SEQ ID




NO: 9 or 10






182
I1-GS10-E96: I/E tandem having I1

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




(with N-terminal extension (N +
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



10) and a short tail) fused via
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGS



GS10 linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO:

GSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWASNRGT




11) to E96 (with N-terminal
YQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGVSTATISGLKP



extension (N + 8) and Cys tail)
GVDYTITVYAVTDAFNPTTHEYNYFTTPISINYRTE



with a 6X His tag (SEQ ID NO:

IDKPCQHHHHHH




487)






183
I1-GS10-E96 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRF



selected from the group consist-
RDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGS



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWASNRGTYQYYRITY




optional and when present is
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGVSTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



selected from the group consist-
YAVDAFNPTTHEYNYFTTPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is




SEQ ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is




SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10






184
I1-(PA)n-E96 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRF



selected from the group consist-
RDYQPISINYRTE(PA)nVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSL



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is
LISWASNRGTYQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGV



optional and when present is
STATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDAFNPTTHEYNYFT



selected from the group consist-
TPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is




SEQ ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is




SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10






185
E105 EGFR monomer with N-terminal

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDAPTSRYQYYRI




extension (N + 10) and Ser tail
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGLSTATISLGKPGVDYTI



with his tag
TVYAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTEIDKPSQ




HHHHHH





186
E105 EGFR monomer core: E105
EVVAATPTSLLISWDAPTSRYQYYRITYGETGGNSP



monomer without N-terminal
VQEFTVPGGLSTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDYKP



extension or C-terminal tail
HADGPHTYHESPISINYRT





187
E105 EGFR monomer, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWDAPTSRYQYYRITYGETGGN




selected from the group consist-
SPVQEFTVPGGLSTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDY



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77 and X2
KPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTX2



is selected from the group




consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10,




or 78-81; in exemplary embodi-




ments, X1 is SEQ ID NO: 69 or 71




and X2 is SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10;




may optionally comprise a his tag






188
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
SWDAPTSRYQ



E105






189
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
PGGLST



E105






117
FG loop sequence from EGFR binder
TDYKPHADGPHTYHESP



E105






190
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
XgDAPTSRYQXh



E105, wherein X is any amino acid




and g and h are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






191
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
XiGGLSXj



E105, wherein X is any amino acid




and i and j are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






139
FG loop sequence from EGFR binder
XkDYKPHADGPHTYHESXl



E105, wherein X is any amino acid




and k and l are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






192
E105-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDAPTSRYQYYRI




E105 (with N-terminal extension
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGLSTATISGLKPGVDYTI



(N + 10) and a short tail) fused
TVYAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTEIDKGSG



via GS10 linker (GS10 is SEQ ID

SGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLL




NO: 11) to I1 (with N-terminal
ISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVY



extension (N + 8) and Cys tail)
TATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTE



with a 6X His tag (SEQ ID NO:

IDKPCQHHHHHH




487)






193
E105-GS10-I1 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWDAPTSRYQYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPGGLSTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDY



selected from the group consist-
KPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSG



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is

SGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLK




optional and when present is
VARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLK



selected from the group consist-
PGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is




SEQ ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is




SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10






194
E105-(PA)n-I1 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWDAPTSRYQYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPGGLSTATISLGKPGVDYTITVYAVTDY



selected from the group consist-
KPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTE(PA)nVSDVPRDLE



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is
VVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPV



optional and when present is
QEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDY



selected from the group consist-
QPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is




SEQ ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is




SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10






195
I1-GS10-E105: I/E tandem having

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




I1 (with N-terminal extension
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



(N + 10) and a short tail) fused
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGS



via GS10 linker (GS10 is SEQ ID

GSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDAPTSR




NO: 11) to E105 (with N-terminal
YQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGLSTATISGLKP



extension (N + 8) and Cys tail)
GVDYTITVYAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTE



with a 6X His tag (SEQ ID NO:

IDKPCQHHHHHH




487)






196
I1-GS10-E105 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRF



selected from the group consist-
RDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGS



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDAPTSRYQYYRITY




optional and when present is
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGLSTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



selected from the group consist-
YAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is




SEQ ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is




SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10






197
I1-(PA)n-E105 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRF



selected from the group consist-
RDYQPISINYRTE(PA)nVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSL



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is
LISWDAPTSRYQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGL



optional and when present is
STATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHE



selected from the group consist-
SPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is




SEQ ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is




SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10






198
E112 EGFR monomer with N-terminal

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDAGAVTYQYYRI




extension (N + 10) and Ser tail
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKPGVDYTI



with his tag
TVYAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHEYPISINYRTEIDKPSQ




HHHHHH





199
E112 EGFR monomer core: E112
EVVAATPTSLLISWDAGAVTYQYYRITYGETGGNSP



monomer without N-terminal
VQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDYKP



extension or C-terminal tail
HADGPHTYHEYPISINYRT





200
E112 EGFR monomer, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWDAGAVTYQYYRITYGETGGN




selected from the group consist-
SPVQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDY



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77 and X2
KPHADGPHTYHEYPISINYRTX2



is selected from the group




consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10,




or 78-81; in exemplary embodi-




ments, X1 is SEQ ID NO: 69 or 71




and X2 is SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10;




may optionally comprise a his tag






201
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
SWDAGAVTYQ



E112






110
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
PGGVRT



E112






202
FG loop sequence from EGFR binder
TDYKPHADGPHTYHEYP



E112






203
BC loop sequence from EGFR binder
XgDAGAVTYQXh



E112, wherein X is any amino acid




and g and h are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






135
DE loop sequence from EGFR binder
XiGGVRXj



E112, wherein X is any amino acid




and i and j are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






204
FG loop sequence from EGFR binder
XkDYKPHADGPHTYHEYXl



E112, wherein X is any amino acid




and k and l are independently




selected from 0 to 5 amino acids






205
E112-GS10-I1: E/I tandem having

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDAGAVTYQYYRI




E112 (with N-terminal extension
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKPGVDYTI



(N + 10) and a short tail) fused
TVYAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHEYPISINYRTEIDKGSG



via GS10 linker (GS10 is SEQ ID

SGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLL




NO: 11) to I1 (with N-terminal
ISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVY



extension (N + 8) and Cys tail)
TATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTE



with a 6X His tag (SEQ ID NO:

IDKPCQHHHHHH




487)






206
E112-GS10-I1 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWDAGAVTYQYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDY



selected from the group consist-
KPHADGPHTYHEYPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSG



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is

SGSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLK




optional and when present is
VARYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLK



selected from the group consist-
PGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is




SEQ ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is




SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10






207
E112-(PA)n-I1 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWDAGAVTYQYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDY



selected from the group consist-
KPHADGPHTYHEYPISINYRTE(PA)nVSDVPRDLE



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is
VVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGNSPV



optional and when present is
QEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRFRDY



selected from the group consist-
QPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is




SEQ ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is




SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10






208
I1-GS10-E112: I/E tandem having

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




I1 (with N-terminal extension
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



(N + 10) and a short tail) fused
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGS



via GS10 linker (GS10 is SEQ ID

GSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDAGAVT




NO: 11) to E112 (with N-terminal
YQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKP



extension (N + 8) and Cys tail)
GVDYTITVYAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHEYPISINYRTE



with a 6X His tag (SEQ ID NO:

IDKPCQHHHHHH




487)






209
I1-GS10-E112 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRF



selected from the group consist-
RDYQPISINYRTEIDKGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGS



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is

VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWDAGAVTYQYYRITY




optional and when present is
GETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGVRTATISGLKPGVDYTITV



selected from the group consist-
YAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHEYPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is




SEQ ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is




SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10






210
I1-(PA)n-E112 core, wherein X1 is

X1EVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRITYGETGGN




optional and when present is
SPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTRF



selected from the group consist-
RDYQPISINYRTE(PA)nVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSL



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 69-77, X2 is
LISWDAGAVTYQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPGGV



optional and when present is
RTATISGLKPGVDYTITVYAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHE



selected from the group consist-
YPISINYRTX2



ing of SEQ ID NOs: 9, 10, or




78-81, and n = 3, 6 or 9; in




exemplary embodiments, X1 is




SEQ ID NO: 69 or 71 and X2 is




SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10






211
I1-GSGCGS8-E5: I/E tandem having

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




I1 (with N-terminal extension
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVNPKVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



(N + 10) and a modified short
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIEKGSGCGSGSGSGS



tail) fused via GSGCGS8 linker

GSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWWAPVDR




(GSGCGS8 is SEQ ID NO: 218) to
YQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVYTATISGLKP



E5 (with N-terminal extension
GVDYTITVYAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTE



(N + 8) and an E tail) with an
HHHHHH



optional 6X His tag (SEQ ID NO:




487)






212
I1-GS10-E5-GSGC: I/E tandem

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




having I1 (with N-terminal
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



extension (N + 10) and a modified
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIEKGSGSGSGSGSGS



short tail) fused via GS10 linker

GSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWWAPVDR




(GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to E5
YQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVYTATISGLKP



(with N-terminal extension (N +
GVDYTITVYAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTE



8) and a modified Cys tail) with

GSGCHHHHHH




an optional 6X His tag (SEQ ID




NO: 487)






213
I1(S62C)-GS10-E5: I/E tandem

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




having I1 (with N-terminal
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATIcustom character GLKPGVDY



extension (N + 10), and S62C
TITVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIEKGSGSGSGSGS



substitution (boxed), and a

GSGSGSGSGSVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWWAPV




modified short tail) fused via
DRYQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVYTATISGL



GS10 linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO:
KPGVDYTITVYAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYR



11) to E5 (with N-terminal
TEHHHHHH



extension (N + 8) and an E tail)




with an optional 6X His tag (SEQ




ID NO: 487); position 62 refers




to the amino acid corresponding




to position 62 of SEQ ID NO: 1






214
I1-GS10-E5(S62C): I/E tandem

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




having I1 (with N-terminal
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



extension (N + 10) and a modified
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIEKGSGSGSGSGSGS



short tail) fused via GS10 linker

GSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWWAPVDR




(GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to E5
YQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVYTATIcustom character GLK



(with N-terminal extension (N +
PGVDYTITVYAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRT



8), and S62C substitution 

EHHHHHH




(boxed), and an E tail) with an




optional 6X His tag (SEQ ID NO:




487); position 62 refers to the




amino acid corresponding to




position 62 of SEQ ID NO: 1






215
I1(S91C)-GS10-E5: I/E tandem

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




having I1 (with N-terminal
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



extension (N + 10), an S91C
TVYAVTRFRDYQPIcustom character NYRTEIEKGSGSGSGSGSGS



substitution (boxed), and a

GSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWWAPVDR




modified short tail) fused via
YQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVYTATISGLKP



GS10 linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO:
GCDYTITVYAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHESPISINYRTE



11) to E5 (with N-terminal
HHHHHH



extension (N + 8) and an E tail)




with an optional 6X His tag (SEQ




ID NO: 487); position 91 refers




to the amino acid corresponding




to position 91 of SEQ ID NO: 1






216
I1-GS10-E5(S91C): I/E tandem

MGVSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWSARLKVARYYRI




having I1 (with N-terminal
TYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPKNVYTATISGLKPGVDYTI



extension (N + 10) and a modified
TVYAVTRFRDYQPISINYRTEIEKGSGSGSGSGSGS



short tail) fused via GS10

GSGSGSGS
VSDVPRDLEVVAATPTSLLISWWAPVDR




linker (GS10 is SEQ ID NO: 11) to
YQYYRITYGETGGNSPVQEFTVPRDVYTATISGLKP



E5 (with N-terminal extension
GVDYTITVYAVTDYKPHADGPHTYHESPIcustom character INYRT



(N + 8), and S91C substitution

EHHHHHH




(boxed), and an E tail) with an




optional 6X His tag (SEQ ID NO:




487); position 91 refers to the




amino acid corresponding to




position 91 of SEQ ID NO: 1






217
Modified short tail
EIEK





218
GSGCGS8 Linker
GSGCGSGSGSGSGSGSGSGS









Example 1
In Cell Western Assay to Screen for EGFR Activity

In Cell Western assays were developed to screen various single 10Fn3 clones for the ability to inhibit EGFR activity in order to identify those that could be linked with IGF1R10Fn3 binders to construct E/I binders. In Cell Western assays were also used to screen and determine relative potency of specific E/I 10Fn3 binders. Two In Cell Western assays were developed to measure 1) inhibition of EGF-stimulated EGFR phosphorylation or 2) inhibition of EGF-stimulated ERK phosphorylation. Cells were seeded into poly-D-lysine coated 96-well microtiter plates (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, N.J.) at 24,000 cells/well for A431 epidermoid carcinoma or FaDu head & neck carcinoma cells and allowed to adhere overnight. Cells were washed once and then incubated for 24 hours in serum free media. Serial dilutions of the 10Fn3-based binders were next applied to the cells and incubated for 2-3 hours prior to stimulation with 100 ng/ml EGF for 10 minutes. Following stimulation, cells were fixed for 20 minutes in PBS containing 3.7% formaldehyde and then permeabilized in PBS containing 0.1% triton-X-100 for 15 minutes. Cells were blocked for one hour in Odyssey blocker (Li-Cor Biosciences, Lincoln, Nebr.) and incubated with antibodies to detect either EGFR phosphorylated on tyrosine 1068 (Cell Signaling, Beverly, Mass.) and β-actin (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) or pERK (MAP kinase phosphorylated on tyrosine 202/threonine 204) and total ERK (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif.). After washing three times in PBS containing 0.1% tween-20, secondary antibodies were added (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif. or Rockland, Gilbertsville, Pa.). Cells were washed three times in PBS containing 0.1% tween-20 and imaged on a Li-Cor Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (Li-Cor Biosciences, Lincoln, Nebr.). Each clone was assayed in duplicate or triplicate and values were normalized to β-actin for the pEGFR assay and total ERK for the pERK assay. IC50 values were calculated from linear regression analysis of percent inhibition of maximum signal minus background.


Results yielded various 10Fn3 clones that had ability to inhibit activity of EGFR, and showed that certain specific E/I 10Fn3 binders possessed similar activity to the example shown in FIG. 9.


Example 2
Expression of 10Fn3-Based Binders

E/I binders were produced by covalently linking an EGFR-binding 10Fn3 to an IGFIR-binding 10Fn3 using a glycine-serine linker, thereby generating 10Fn3 dimers, wherein each 10Fn3 domain binds to a different target. The IGFIR-binding 10Fn3 (I1) was previously described as SEQ ID NO: 226 in PCT Publication No. WO 2008/066752. Two novel EGFR-binding 10Fn3 (E2 and E1) were identified by screening an RNA-protein fusion library, as described in PCT Publication No. WO 2008/066752, for binders to EGFR-Fc (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn.). The following examples describe results using a variety of His-tagged E/I 10Fn3-based binders (non-pegylated): E2-GS10-I1 (SEQ ID NO: 25), E1-GS10-I1 (SEQ ID NO: 31), I1-GS10-E1 (SEQ ID NO: 28), and I1-GS10-E2 (SEQ ID NO: 22).


The following examples also describe results with the following pegylated, His-tagged E/I 10Fn3-based binders: E1-GS10-I1 (SEQ ID NO: 55), E2-GS10-I1 (SEQ ID NO: 56), E3-GS10-I1 (SEQ ID NO: 53), I1-GS10-E1 (SEQ ID NO: 57), I1-GS10-E2 (SEQ ID NO: 58), I1-GS10-E3 (SEQ ID NO: 54), E4-GS10-I1 (SEQ ID NO: 120), I1-GS10-E4 (SEQ ID NO: 124), E5-GS10-I1 (SEQ ID NO: 128), I1-GS10-E5 (SEQ ID NO: 132), E85-GS10-I1 (SEQ ID NO: 149), I1-GS10-E85 (SEQ ID NO: 152), E90-GS10-I1 (SEQ ID NO: 164), E96-GS10-I1 (SEQ ID NO: 179), E105-G51041 (SEQ ID NO: 192), I1-GS10-E105 (SEQ ID NO: 195), E112-G51041 (SEQ ID NO: 205), I1-GS10-E112 (SEQ ID NO: 208), I1-GSGCGS8-E5 (SEQ ID NO: 211), I1-GS10-E5-GSGC (SEQ ID NO: 212), I1(S62C)-GS10-E5 (SEQ ID NO: 213), I1-GS10-E5(S62C) (SEQ ID NO: 214), I1(S91C)-GS10-E5 (SEQ ID NO: 215), and I1-GS10-E5(S91C) (SEQ ID NO: 216).


The examples also describe results using a His-tagged IGFRIR10Fn3-based binder, I1 (SEQ ID NO: 4), and ten His-tagged EGFR 10Fn3-based binders, E2 (SEQ ID NO: 6), E1 (SEQ ID NO: 8), E3 (SEQ ID NO: 52), E4 (SEQ ID NO: 107), ES (SEQ ID NO: 113, wherein X=Ser and with a His tag at the C-terminus), E5 pegylated (SEQ ID NO: 113, wherein X=Cys and with a His tag at the C-terminus), E85 (SEQ ID NO: 140), E90 (SEQ ID NO: 155), E96 (SEQ ID NO: 170), E105 (SEQ ID NO: 185), and E112 (SEQ ID NO: 198). Examples 32 also describes a variety of E monomers having the sequences set forth in FIG. 45 and including a His tag at the C-terminus.


The various 10Fn3-based binders were purified using a high throughput protein production process (HTPP). Selected binders were cloned into the pET9d vector in order to generate His6 tag (SEQ ID NO: 487) fusions. DNA was transformed into E. coli HMS174(DE3), and cells were inoculated in 5 ml LB medium containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin in a 24-well format and grown at 37° C. overnight. Fresh 5 ml LB medium (50 μg/mL kanamycin) cultures were prepared for inducible expression by aspirating 200 μl from the overnight culture and dispensing it into the appropriate well. The cultures were grown at 37° C. until A600 0.6-0.9. After induction with 1 mM isopropyl-β-thiogalactoside (IPTG), the culture was grown for another 6 hours at 30° C. and harvested by centrifugation for 10 minutes at 3220×g at 4° C. Cell pellets were frozen at 80° C.


Cell pellets (in 24-well format) were lysed by resuspension in 450 μl of Lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 0.5 M NaCl, 1× Complete™ Protease Inhibitor Cocktail-EDTA free (Roche), 1 mM PMSF, 10 mM CHAPS, 40 mM imidazole, 1 mg/ml lysozyme, 30 ug/ml DNAse, 2 μg/ml aprotonin, pH 8.0) and shaken at room temperature for 1 hour. Lysates were clarified and re-racked into a 96-well format by transfer into a 96-well Whatman GF/D Unifilter fitted with a 96-well, 650 μl catch plate and centrifuged for 5 minutes at 200×g. The clarified lysates were transferred to a 96-well Ni-Chelating Plate that had been equilibrated with equilibration buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 0.5 M NaCl, 10 mM CHAPS, 40 mM imidazole, pH 8.0) and incubated for 5 minutes. Unbound material was removed by vacuum. The resin was washed 2×0.3 ml/well with Wash buffer #1 (50 mM NaH2PO4, 0.5 M NaCl, 5 mM CHAPS, 40 mM imidazole, pH 8.0) with each wash removed by vacuum. Next, the resin was washed with 3×0.3 ml/well with PBS with each wash step removed by vacuum. Prior to elution, each well was washed with 50 μl Elution buffer (PBS+20 mM EDTA), incubated for 5 minutes, and the wash discarded by vacuum. Protein was eluted by applying an additional 100 μl of Elution buffer to each well. After a 30 minute incubation at room temperature, the plate(s) were centrifuged for 5 minutes at 200×g and eluted protein collected in 96-well catch plates containing 5 μl of 0.5 M MgCl2 affixed to the bottom of the Ni-plates. Eluted protein was quantified using a BCA Protein assay with SEQ ID NO: 2 as the protein standard.


HTPP yielded active 10Fn3-based binders that were expressed in a soluble form and purified from the soluble fraction of the bacterial cytosol. FIG. 1 depicts an exemplary SDS-PAGE analysis from one of the E/I 10Fn3-based binders. SEC analysis on a Superdex 200 5/150 GL in a mobile phase of 100 mM NaPO4, 100 mM NaSO4, 150 mM NaCl, pH 6.8 (GE Healthcare) demonstrated predominantly monomeric proteins (see Example 4).


In addition, midscale expression and purification of select 10Fn3-based binders was performed. The selected binders, fused to a His6 tag (SEQ ID NO: 487), were cloned into a pET9d or pET29 vector and expressed in E. coli HMS174(DE3) or BL212(DE3) (EMD Biosciences, San Diego, Calif.) cells. 20 ml of an inoculum culture (generated from a single plated colony) was used to inoculate 1 liter of LB medium containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin. The culture was grown at 37° C. until A600 0.6-1.0. After induction with 1 mM isopropyl-β-thiogalactoside (IPTG), the culture was grown for another 6 hours at 30° C. Alternatively, expression was carried out at 18° C. after initial growth at 37° C. using autoinduction media (“ONE” medium, EMD Biosciences, San Diego, Calif.). Cell pellets were harvested by centrifugation for 30 minutes at ≧10,000×g at 4° C. and frozen at 80° C. The cell pellet was resuspended in 25 mL of lysis buffer (20 mM NaH2PO4, 0.5 M NaCl, 1× Complete™ Protease Inhibitor Cocktail-EDTA free (Roche), pH 7.4) using an Ultra-turrax homgenizer on ice. Cell lysis was achieved by high pressure homogenization (≧18,000 psi) using a Model M-110S Microfluidizer (Microfluidics). The soluble fraction was separated by centrifugation for 30 minutes at 23,300×g at 4° C. The supernatant was clarified via 0.45 μm filter. The clarified lysate was loaded onto a HisTrap column (GE) pre-equilibrated with 20 mM NaH2PO4, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 7.4. The column was then washed with 25 column volumes of 20 mM NaH2PO4, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 7.4, followed by 20 column volumes of 20 mM NaH2PO4, 0.5 M NaCl, 25 mM imidazole, pH 7.4, and then 35 column volumes of 20 mM NaH2PO4, 0.5 M NaCl, 40 mM imidazole, pH 7.4. Protein was eluted with 15 column volumes of 20 mM NaH2PO4, 0.5 M NaCl, 500 mM imidazole, pH 7.4, fractions pooled based on absorbance at A280 and dialyzed against 1×PBS, 50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 8.5 or 50 mM NaOAc, 150 mM NaCl, pH4.5. Any precipitate was removed by filtering at 0.22 μm.


Midscale expression and purification yielded highly pure and active proteins that were expressed in a soluble form and purified from the soluble fraction of the bacterial cytosol. SEC analysis on a Superdex 200 10/30GL in a mobile phase of 100 mM NaPO4, 100 mM NaSO4, 150 mM NaCl, pH 6.8 (GE Healthcare) demonstrated predominantly monomeric proteins (see Example 4).


Example 3
Pegylation of E/I 10Fn3-Based Binders

Multi-valent fibronectin based scaffold proteins, such as E/I 10Fn3-based binders, can be pegylated with various sizes and types of PEG. To allow for pegylation, the protein is typically modified near the C-terminus by a single point mutation of an amino acid, typically a serine, to a cysteine. PEGylation of the protein at the single cysteine residue is accomplished through conjugation with various maleimide-derivatized PEG forms by combining the derivitized-PEG reagent with the protein solution and incubating. Progress and confirmation of the PEGylation conjugation reaction can be confirmed by SDS-PAGE and/or SE-HPLC methods that separate the non-PEGylated protein from the PEGylated protein.


For example, the construct E2-GS10-I1 (SEQ ID NO: 25) was pegylated by replacing a serine that was at position 221 with a cysteine. The resulting construct, SEQ ID NO: 56, was then conjugated with a maleimide-derivatized 40 kDa branched PEG (NOF America Corporation, White Plains, N.Y.). The derivatized PEG reagent was mixed with the protein construct in solution and incubated at pH 7.40 at Room temperature until the reaction was complete, typically 30 minutes or overnight at 4° C. The pH was lowered to pH 4.5 or pH 5.0 by dialysis or rapid desalting using size exclusion column chromotography into in 50 NaOAc, 150 mM NaCl buffer. The mixture of products and excess reactants from the PEGylation reaction were then loaded onto a cation exchange chromotography column at the lowered pH and eluted with a 150 mM to 1 M NaCl gradient. Studies to confirm the pegylation were also conducted as described in the paragraph above. The conjugations can be performed with the His tagged or the His-Tag free versions of the protein.


On occasions in which E. coli endotoxin contamination needed to be depleted in the sample, two methods used either separately or in conjunction with one another were employed. The first was to wash the cation exchange column with typically 5 column volumes NaOAc buffer supplemented with 0.5% Triton X-100, followed by 20 column volumes (or more) of the same buffer without Triton X-100. Additionally or in place of this procedure, the protein was passed very slowly through a Sartorius Sartobind® Q filter (Sartorius Stedim Biotech Bohemia, N.Y.).


Two of the E/I 10Fn3-based binders, E2-GS10-I1-cys (with his) (SEQ ID NO: 56) and E3-GS10-I1-Cys (with his) (SEQ ID NO: 53), were pegylated using an alternative procedure. Five ml of an inoculum culture of BL21(DE3) E. coli cells containing a T7 ploymerase driven pET29 plasmid encoding either E2-GS10-I1-cys (with his) or E3-GS10-I1-Cys (with his), were generated from a single plated colony and used to inoculate 1 liter of auto-induction media (“ONE” medium, EMD Biosciences, San Diego, Calif.) containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin. Expression was carried out at 18° C. after initial growth at 37° C. and harvested by centrifugation for 10 minutes at ˜10,000×g at 4° C. Cell pellets were frozen at 80° C. The cell pellet was resuspended in 10 mL of lysis buffer (20 mM NaH2PO4, 0.5 M NaCl, 5 mM Immidazole, pH 7.4) and mechanically lysed using an Avestin homgenizer. The soluble fraction was separated by centrifugation for 15 minutes at 23,300×g at 4° C. The supernatant was decanted and the pellet was solubilized in Lysis buffer (above) supplemented with 4 M to 6 M guanidine hydrochloride (GdnHCl). Solubilized protein was then purified on a suitably sized NiNTA column (Qiagen, Inc.) pre-equilibrated with the GdnHCL supplemented Lysis Buffer. The column was then washed with 5 to 10 column volumes of the same buffer, followed by elution with the same buffer supplemented with 300 mM Immidazole. The fractions eluted off the column containing the protein of interest were diluted to 2-3 mgs/mL protein and then combined with a 1.2-1.5 molar excess of solid NEM-PEG (40 kDa branched or other). The mixture was allowed to react at room temperature for 30 minutes or until the reaction was complete. The entire reaction volume was then placed into a dialysis bag (5,000 Da Molecular Weight cutoff) and the mixture was subjected to a dialysis refolding process. For example, this process may consist of two 10-16 hour 500:1 (buffer:dialysate) dialysis exchanges against 50 mM NaOAc, 150 mm NaCl, pH 4.5. The dialysate from this procedure contains properly folded, PEGylated materials plus excess reactants. The mixture of products and excess reactants from the PEGylation reaction were clarified via centrifugation or filtration prior to loading them onto a cation exchange chromotography column (SP Sepharose or Resource S, GE Healthcare). The column was developed with 150 mM to 1 M NaCl gradient in the NaOAc background buffer. Studies to confirm the pegylation were conducted as described above.


Example 4
Biophysical Characterization of 10 Fn3-Based Binders

Standard size exclusion chromatography (SEC) was performed on the proteins purified from the HTPP and the midscale processes (0.1 to 1 μg of protein for HTPP and 10-50 ug for midscale). SEC of HTPP derived material was performed using a Superdex 200 5/150 column (GE Healthcare) or on a Superdex 200 10/30 column (GE Healthcare) for midscaled material on an Agilent 1100 or 1200 HPLC system with UV detection at A214 nm and A280 nm and with fluorescence detection (excitation=280 nm, emission=350 nm). A buffer of 100 mM sodium sulfate, 100 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, pH 6.8 at appropriate flow rate of the SEC column employed. Gel filtration standards (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.) were used for molecular weight calibration.


The results of the SEC on the HTPP purified 10Fn3-based binders showed predominantly monomeric proteins and elution in the approximate range of 25 kDa vs. globular Gel Filtration standards (BioRad).


The results of the SEC on the midscaled purified 10Fn3-based binders showed predominantly monomeric proteins and elution in the approximate range of 25 kDa vs. globular Gel Filtration standards (BioRad). FIG. 2 depicts exemplary SEC profiles for E/I 10Fn3-based binders (I1-GS10-E2 in FIGS. 2A and E2-GS10-I1 in FIG. 2B).


Select midscale 10Fn3-based binders were further analyzed by LC-MS (Water's 2695 liquid chromatography HPLC system coupled with Waters Q-TOF API mass spectrometer, Waters Corporation, Milford, Mass.). Samples were diluted to approximately 0.5 mg/ml with HPLC grade water. Approximately 5 μl of diluted sample was injected onto a Jupiter C18 column (Catalog number 00G-4053-80, Phenomenex). Buffer A: 0.02% TFA+0.08% formic acid in HPLC grade water. Buffer B: 0.02% TFA+0.08% formic acid in HPLC grade acetonitrile. Sample was eluted with gradient (Table 1) at flow rate 0.2 ml/minutes.











TABLE 1





Time
% A
B %

















0
95
5


5.00
75
25


25.00
55
45


30.00
5
95


32.00
95
5


45.00
95
5









HPLC elution was split at approximately to 1:1 ratio and half sent to UV detector and the other half to mass spectrometer. Mass spectrometer had the following instrument settings: capillary voltage 3.5 KV, cone voltage 40, source temperature 80° C., desolvation temperature 250° C., desolvation gas flow 450 and multi channel photo detector voltage 2200. Raw spectra were deconvoluted with MaxEn1 (Waters Corporation).


The molecular weight of I1-GS10-E2 (SEQ ID NO: 22) as measured by LC-MS is 24,445 Dalton, which is within 1 Dalton from the molecular weight calculated from the amino acid composition. This indicates that the protein has the correct amino acid composition and the N terminal methionine is processed. There is no other post translational modification on the protein.


Differential Scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis of the midscaled I1-GS10-E2 was performed to determine the Tm. A 1 mg/ml solution was scanned in a N-DSC II calorimeter (calorimetry Sciences Corp) by ramping the temperature from 5° C. to 95° C. at a rate of 1 degree per minute under 3 atm pressure. The data was analyzed versus a control run of the appropriate buffer using a best fit using Orgin Software (OrginLab Corp). The results of this assay demonstrate that the E/I binder has a Tm of 50.69° C. (see FIG. 3A). Using the same methods, the Tm of E2-GS10-I1 (with Peg) was determined to be 50.72° C. and the Tm of E2-GS10-I1 (without Peg) was determined to be 56.82° C. (see FIG. 3B).


Example 5
Determination of Binding Affinity

Surface plasmon resonance (BIAcore) analysis was performed on solution-phase 10Fn3-based binders in order to determine off-rates and/or binding affinities using captured EGFR-Fc and IGF1R-Fc. The extracellular domain of human IGF1R (aa 1-932) was cloned into a mammalian expression vector containing the hinge and constant regions of human IgG1. Transient transfection of the plasmid produced a fusion protein, IGF1R-Fc which was subsequently purified by Protein A chromatography. Recombinant human EGFR-Fc (aa 1-645 of the extracellular domain of human EGFR fused to human Fc) was purchased from R&D systems (Minneapolis, Minn.). IGF1R-Fc was captured on immobilized Protein A whereas EGFR-Fc was captured on immobilized anti-human antibody.


In a typical experiment, anti-human IgG was immobilized on flow cells 1 and 2 of a CM5 chip following the manufacturer's recommendations (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, N.J.). EGFR-Fc (50 nM) was injected at 5 uL for 2 minutes on flow cell 2 (Fc2). Two 30 second injections of 3 M MgCl2 were used for regeneration of the bound EGFR-Fc from the anti-human IgG surface. Protein A was diluted to 80 ug/mL in acetate pH 4.5 and immobilized to ˜3000 RU on flow cells 3 and 4 of a CM5 chip surface. Approximately 1300 RU of IGF1R-Fc was captured on Fc 4. Two 30 second injections of 50 mM glycine pH 1.5 were used to regenerate the surface between samples.


A concentration series of 100 nM to 1 nM of HTPP purified protein (three data points collected) or 300 nM to 0.05 nM of midscale purified protein (eleven data points collected) was evaluated for binding to EGFR-Fc or IGF1R-Fc. Sensorgrams were obtained at each concentration and were evaluated using Biacore T100 Evaluation Software, Version 1.1.1 (GE healthcare/Biacore) to determine the rate constants ka (kon) and kd (koff). For the HTPP evaluation the off-rate was fitted from the 3 point curves. The affinity KD was calculated from the ratio of rate constants koff/kon.


The EGFR 10Fn3-based binders were evaluated for specificity in a similar format using anti-human IgG to capture HER2-Fc. The 10Fn3-based binders did not show any discernible binding to captured HER2-Fc under conditions where robust binding was seen for EGFR-Fc.


As shown in Table 2, both domains of the E/I 10Fn3-based binders are functional, retaining their binding properties to the respective targets. The off rates shown in Table 2 are from midscale material and are similar to the qualitative results obtained with the HTPP material.









TABLE 2







Summary of binding constants for 10Fn3-based binders











Target
Protein
ka (1/Ms)
kd (1/s)
KD (nM)














EGFR-Fc
E1
1.19E+05
1.18E−03
9.92




1.43E+05
1.89E−03
13.2



E1-GS10-I1
6.29E+04
4.74E−04
7.53




3.82E+04
3.89E−04
10.17



I1-GS10-E1
1.26E+05
6.03E−04
4.8




4.13E+04
4.25E−04
10.28



E2
3.73E+05
2.72E−04
0.73




3.27E+05
 3.2E−04
0.98



E2-GS10-I1
3.93E+05
1.75E−04
0.45




3.75E+05
1.67E−04
0.45



I1-GS10-E2
6.47E+05
1.42E−04
0.22




3.90E+05
1.14E−04
0.29



E3
2.83E+05
3.98E−04
3.4






1.4



E3-GS10-I1
3.49E+05
2.29E−04
0.66



I1-GS10-E3
1.17E+05
2.91E−04
2.48


IGF1R-Fc
I1
3.84E+06
4.34E−04
0.11



E1-GS10-I1
5.13E+05
3.38E−04
0.66



I1-GS10-E1
1.47E+06
3.98E−04
0.27



E2-GS10-I1
1.24E+06
3.95E−04
0.32



I1-GS10-E2
3.82E+06
4.79E−04
0.13



E3-GS10-I1
 1.8E+06
2.09E−04
0.12



I1-GS10-E3
1.37E+06
4.54E−05
0.03









Example 6
Inhibition of IGFR activity in H292 Cells

The ability of E/I 10Fn3-based binders to inhibit phosphorylation of IGF1R on tyrosine 1131 was determined using an H292 cell in vitro assay. Briefly, 65×103 H292 cells were plated in 96-well microplates (Biocoat Poly-D-Lysine coated 96-well plate, cat#356640, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, N.J.) in RPMI-1640 culture medium containing 10 mM Hepes pH 7.4 and 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells were allowed to adhere for 24 hours at 37° C., 5% CO2. The next day cells were washed once with 200 microliters per well of serum free RPMI-1640 and incubated overnight in 100 μL per well of serum free RPMI-1640. Serial dilutions of HTPP material was added and cells were incubated for an additional 3 hours. Cells were stimulated with 100 ng/ml of IGF-1 (cat#500-P11, PeproTech, Rocky Hill, N.J.) for 10 minutes at 37° C. Media was dumped from the plate and 100 μL of cell lysis buffer (Cell Signaling cat#9803, Beverly, Mass.) was added to each well. Cells were incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes to allow lysis and lysate was transferred to a phospho-IGFR ELISA (cat#7302, Cell Signaling, Beverly, Mass.). The manufacturer's procedure was followed to carry out the ELISA.


As demonstrated in FIG. 4, His tagged E1-GS10-I1 inhibited IGF1-stimulated phosphorylation of the IGF1R (IC50=0.004 uM) with comparable potency to the isolated IGF1R binder, I1 (IC50=0.018 uM). The EGFR binder, E1, alone had very little effect on IGF1R phosphorylation (IC50>3.5 uM). As shown in FIG. 9, additional E/I binders demonstrated ability to inhibit IGF1R-stimulated phosphorylation with an IC50 in the range of 0.1 nM to 19 nM, including several pegylated E/I binders that were tested. In particular, for the pegylated E/I binders E1-GS10-I1, and I1-GS10-E1, inhibition of pIGFR was shown at 0.9 nM and 4 nM, respectively. For pegylated E/I binders E2-GS10-I1 and I1-GS10-E2, inhibition of pIGFR was shown at 0.3 nM and 0.8 nM, respectively.


Example 7
Inhibition of EGFR Activity in H292 Cells

The ability of E/I 10Fn3-based binders to inhibit phosphorylation of the EGFR on tyrosine 1068 was determined using an H292 cell in vitro assay. The assay was carried out as described in Example 6, except that cells were stimulated with 100 ng/ml of EGF (cat#236-EG-200, R & D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn.) and a phospho-EGFR ELISA was performed (cat#7240, Cell Signaling, Beverly, Mass.). The manufacturer's procedure was followed to carry out the ELISA.


As demonstrated in FIG. 5, His-tagged E1-GS10-I1 inhibited EGF-stimulated phosphorylation of the EGFR (IC50=0.020 uM) with comparable potency to the isolated EGFR binder, E1 (IC50=0.007 uM). The IGF1R binder, I1 alone had very little effect on EGFR phosphorylation (IC50>6.21 uM). As shown in FIG. 9, additional E/I binders demonstrated ability to inhibit EGF-stimulated phosphorylation with an IC50 in the range of 7 nM to 127 nM, including several pegylated E/I binders that were tested. In particular, for pegylated E2-GS10-I1 and I1-GS10-E2, inhibition of pEGFR was shown at 32 nM and 47 nM, respectively. Similar data is shown in FIG. 11 for the pegylated E/I binders E2-GS10-I1, and I1-GS10-E2.


Example 8
Inhibition of EGF+IGF1-Induced pAKT in H292 Cells

The ability of E/I 10Fn3-based binders to inhibit phosphorylation of AKT on serine 473 was determined using an H292 cell in vitro assay. The assay was carried out as described in Example 6, except that cells were simultaneously stimulated with both EGF and IGF1 as described above and lysates were analyzed with a phospho-AKT ELISA (cat#7160, Cell Signaling, Beverly, Mass.). The manufacturer's procedure was followed to carry out the ELISA.


Signal transduction at EGFR and IGF1R feeds into the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway and stimulates phosphorylation of AKT. As demonstrated in FIG. 6, E1-GS10-I1 inhibited EGF and IGF1-stimulated phosphorylation of AKT in H292 cells. The E/I 10Fn3-based binder was slightly more potent in its ability to block AKT activation (IC50=0.004 uM) than the IGF1R binder, I1, by itself (IC50=0.031 uM). The EGFR binder, E1, exhibited only modest activity in its ability to block AKT activation by both ligands (IC50=1.28 uM). As shown in FIG. 9, additional E/I binders demonstrated ability to inhibit EGF and IGF1-stimulated phosphorylation of AKT with an IC50 in the range of 0.1 nM to 26 nM, including several pegylated E/I binders that were tested.


Example 9
Inhibition of Cell Proliferation in RH41 and H292 Cells

E/I 10Fn3-based binders were evaluated for antiproliferative activity in the H292 non-small cell lung carcinoma cell line, which depends on EGFR signaling for growth, or the RH41 Ewing sarcoma cell line, which depends on IGF1R signaling for growth. Antiproliferative activity of binders was assessed in monolayer cultures by staining cellular DNA with the CyQuantNF fluorescent stain (cat#C35006, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.). Briefly, 2×103 H292 or 5×103 RH41 cells were plated into 96-well microplates (View Plates 96F cat#6005225, Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, Mass.) in RPMI-1640 culture medium containing 10 mM Hepes pH 7.4 and 10% fetal bovine serum and allowed to adhere for 24 hours at 37° C., 5% CO2. Cells were maintained as exponentially growing monolayers and remained in logarithmic growth phase during the period of the assay without reaching confluence during the course of the assay. Twenty-four hours after plating, serial dilutions of midscale material was added and cells were incubated for an additional 72 hours. Following this incubation, cells were treated with CyQuantNF reagent and allowed to incorporate dye into cellular DNA for 1 hour at 37° C. Total DNA was quantified by reading fluorescence at 485 nm excitation and 530 nm emission on a CytoFluor 4000 instrument (Applied Biosystems, Framingham, Mass.). Total time that cells were exposed to drug was 72 hours. Standard compounds were included in each experiment to verify assay performance and reproducibility. Linear regression analysis of the percent of inhibition by test compound was used to determine IC50 values.


As demonstrated in FIG. 7, in RH41 cells, His-tagged E1-GS10-I1 inhibited proliferation with comparable potency (IC50=0.009 uM) to the IGFR binder, I1 (IC50=0.028 uM). The EGFR binder, E1, by itself had very little effect on the proliferation in this cell line (IC50>12.5 uM).


As demonstrated in FIG. 8, in H292 cells, His-tagged E2-GS10-I1 inhibited proliferation with greater potency (IC50=0.329 uM) than the IGFR binder, I1, (IC50=0.699 uM) or the EGFR binder, E2 (IC50=0.553 uM). See Table 4 below for the IC50 values for the E and I monomers.


Example 10
Competitive EGF Ligand Binding Assay

The E/I binders E1-GS10-I1, I1-GS10-E1, E2-GS10-I1 and I1-GS10-E2 (HTPP material) were tested in an EGF ligand binding cell-based competition assay in A431 cells and compared to EGFR 10Fn3-based binders E1 and E2 (midscale material). A431 cells were plated at 15000 cells/well in 96-well plates in DMEM+10% FBS and incubated 48 hours. Cells were washed with starvation media (DMEM+0.1% BSA) and incubated in starvation media for 1 hour. Starvation media was removed and replaced with 10Fn3-based binders that were diluted in starvation media and cells were pre-incubated for 30 minutes at 37° C. to allow proteins to bind to EGF receptors on cell surfaces. 10 nM final concentration of Europium (Eu)-labeled EGF (Perkin Elmer, Boston, Mass.) diluted in starvation media was added to pre-incubated cells and plates were incubated for 3 hours at 4° C. in the dark. Plates were washed twice with cold PBS and 50 ul/well of Enhancement solution (Perkin Elmer, Boston, Mass.) was added to plates and incubated 1 hour at 37° C. Plates were read on the Flexstation II (Molecular Devices). The data was plotted with Softmax plus software and IC50 values, i.e., the concentration of 10Fn3-based binders required to inhibit 50% of the Eu-EGF ligand from binding to the EGF receptor on the cell surfaces, were calculated.


The results for E2 and E1 compared with E2-GS10-I1, 11-GS10-E2, E1-GS10-I1 and I1-GS10-E1 are summarized in Table 3. This data indicates that the E/I 10Fn3-based binders compete with, and inhibit the binding of, EGF to the EGFR receptor on A431 cells with similar potency to the EGFR 10Fn3-based binders. See Table 4 below for the IC50 values for the E and I monomers.









TABLE 3







Summary of IC50 values for


inhibition of EGF Binding to


EGFR on A431 cell surfaces










Protein
IC50 (nM)














E2
7



E1
14



E2-GS10-I1
1.8



I1-GS10-E2
1.4



E1-GS10-I1
14.6



I1-GS10-E1
7










Example 11
Activation and Signaling Activity in Cell-Based Assays

Target effects of the various E/I 10Fn3-based binders were evaluated in DiFi colon carcinoma cells by immunoblotting. Cells were seeded at 4×105 cells in each 25 cm2 flask and incubated overnight at 37° C. in 5% CO2. The next day, treatments were initiated and cells were further incubated for various times from 1.5 to 120 hours. Cells were then lysed in HNTG (50 mM Hepes, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% triton-X-100, 8% glycerol, 2 mM Na3VO4, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA containing the protease inhibitors AEBSF, aprotinin, leupeptin, bestatin, pepstatin-A and E64) and total protein was quantified with the BCA protein assay (Pierce, Waltham, Mass.). Levels of total EGFR, total IGF1R and the phosphorylation state of the EGFR, MAP kinase protein ERK1/2 isoforms, was detected by SDS-PAGE analysis of 20 micrograms of total protein followed by transfer of proteins to nitrocellulose and immunoblotting with specific antibodies. Blots were also probed with β-actin to demonstrate equal loading of each sample.


The pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders E1-GS10-I1 (SEQ ID NO: 55), E2-GS10-I1 (SEQ ID NO: 56), and E3-GS10-I1 (SEQ ID NO: 53), demonstrated the ability to degrade EGFR in this assay. In addition, for E3-GS10-I1 (SEQ ID NO: 53), degradation of IGF1R was also observed. The effect on EGFR degradation for the pegylated binder E2-GS10-I1 is shown in FIG. 10, as are other effects on signaling molecules. Additionally, the non-pegylated version of the binder E2-GS10-I1 demonstrated similar EGFR degradation (data not shown). FIG. 10 shows that for the pegylated binder I1-GS10-E2, there was no EGFR degradation. Table 4 below summarizes various properties of the E monomers.









TABLE 4







Summary of properties of E monomers.


EGFR














Neutralizes
Inhibition
Inhibition
Inhibition of



BIAcore
EGF
of
of
H292



KD
Binding
pEGFR
pERK
Proliferation


Monomer
IC50
IC50
IC50
IC50
IC50















E1
14.6 nM
0.53 nM
18 nM
17 nM
18 nM


E2
 1.4 nM
1.46 nM
20 nM
40 nM
30 nM


E3
0.72 nM
0.87 nM
11 nM
97 nM
26 nM









Example 12
Evaluation of Certain E/I 10Fn3-Based Binders on H292 Tumor Xenografts Grown in Nude Mice

The pegylated E/I binders E2-GS10-I1 and E3-GS10-I1 as well as the monoclonal antibody panitumumab were evaluated in an H292 tumor xenograft model. For in vivo models, panitumumab was obtained as the marketed drug and E/I binders were purified as described above. In vitro activity of all E/I binders was validated prior to administration in animals by testing functionality of each end in the EGF-stimulated pEGFR and the IGF1-stimulated pIGFR assay in H292 cells. E/I binders were diluted in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at the beginning of the experiment and stored at 2-4° C. for the duration of each study. Both compounds were administered i.p. in a total volume of 500 μl/inj/mouse and were equilibrated to room temperature prior to administration.


Mice and Tumor Propagation.


Female athymic (nude) mice 5-6 weeks of age were obtained from Harlan Sprague-Dawley Co. (Indianapolis, Ind.). and were quarantined for approximately 3 weeks prior to their use for tumor propagation or drug efficacy testing. The animals were provided food and water ad libitum. Animal care was performed in keeping with AAALAC and Bristol-Myers Squibb guidelines. Tumors were propagated by subcutaneous (s.c.) implantation in nude mice. Tumor passages occurred approximately every two to four weeks.


In vivo antitumor testing. Estimated tumor weight was calculated using the formula: Tumor weight (mg)=(w2*l)/2; where w=width and l=length in mm. Antitumor activity was evaluated in terms of % tumor growth inhibition (TGI) where a % TGI of >50% was considered active. Relative % tumor growth inhibition was calculated as % TGI=[(Ct−Tt)/(Ct−C0)]×100 where Ct=median tumor weight of control mice at time t in days after tumor implant, T=median tumor weight of treated mice at time t, C0=median tumor weight of control mice at time 0. % TGI value was calculated at various time points beginning after 1.5 tumor volume doubling times and sustained over a time period of 3 tumor volume doubling times (TVDT) where possible. Where, TVDT=median time (days) for control tumors to reach target size—median time (days) for control tumors to reach half the target size. The definition of a cured mouse was one whose tumor was undetectable, or <35 mg, when assessed more than 10 TVDTs post-treatment. The dose of a compound which yielded the maximum therapeutic effect, was termed the optimal dose (OD). Treatment groups (typically 8 mice) with more than one death attributable to drug toxicity were considered to have had excessively toxic treatments and their data were not used in the evaluation of antitumor activity. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is defined as the dose level immediately below which excessive toxicity (i.e. more than one death) occurred. Treated mice dying prior to having their tumors reach target size were considered to have died from drug toxicity. Statistical evaluations of data were performed using Gehan's generalized Wilcoxon test (Gehan, E A, A Generalized Wilcoxon Test for Comparing Arbitrarily Slightly-Censored Samples, Biometrika 52:203-223, 1965).


Measurement of Pharmacodynamic Endpoints in Tumors.


Tumors were harvested from untreated or drug treated mice and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Samples were weighed and homogenized in 10 μl of lysis buffer (50 mM Hepes, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% triton-X-100, 8% glycerol, 2 mM Na3VO4, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA containing one complete mini protease inhibitor tablet Sigma #S 8820 per 15 ml buffer and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail Sigma #P5726) for each mg of tissue. Tissues were minced in a 100 mm petri dish with two scalpels, transferred to Falcon#2059 polypropylene round bottom tubes and macerated with a hand held homogenizer for 30 seconds. Homogenate was transferred to 1.5 ml eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 15000×g for 2 minutes in a microfuge. Clarified supernatant was transferred to a new tube and total protein concentration was determined with the Pierce BCA protein assay (Pierce Biotechnology). Samples were analyzed by immunoblotting or on a Meso scale MSD Sector Imager 6000 multi spot assay system as recommended by the manufacturer (Meso Scale Discovery, Gaithersburg, Md.).


The pegylated E/I binders E2-GS10-I1 and E3-GS10-I1 were tested in an H292 NSCLC in athymic mice. Tumors were implanted subcutaneously with 1 mm3 H292 tumor fragments in the hind flank and allowed to establish to a size of 50-150 mg prior to initiation of treatment on Day 6 post-tumor implant. The pegylated E/I binders were administered i.p. at a dose of 100 mg/kg on a TIWX3 schedule to assess antitumor activity. Panitumumab was obtained as marketed drug and administered i.p. at its optimal dose of 1 mg/mouse and at a lower dose of 0.1 mg/mouse on a Q3DX5 schedule. Mean tumor sizes calculated from groups of 8 mice are shown in FIG. 12A. The 1 mg/mouse and 0.1 mg/mouse doses of panitumumab were both active by % TGI with values of 101% and 100%, respectively and these values were significantly different from control animals (p=0.0002, Table 5). Pegylated E2-GS10-I1 was also significantly active by % TGI with a value of 96% (p=0.0005). Pegylated E3-GS10-I1 was not active in this study with a % TGI value of 31% that was not statistically different from the control group (p=0.416). Post dosing analysis indicated that approximately two thirds of the pegylated E3-GS10-I1 was aggregated (66.64% aggregation/33.36% monomer for one batch and 72.53% aggregation/27.47% monomer for another batch) which could account for the poor activity of pegylated E3-GS10-I1 in this assay. In contrast, the pegylated E2-GS10-I1 showed only a small percentage of aggregation in post dosing studies (1.79% aggregation/98.21% monomer).


All treatments were well tolerated with no treatment related deaths or excessive weight loss over the course of the study. Clinical observations revealed no evidence of toxicity and the average weight change over the course of therapy was within acceptable limits (FIG. 12B).









TABLE 5







Results of the H292 human tumor xenograft study
















Schedule,
Dose
AVE weight

p value for
Outcome


Group
Compound
Route
(mg/kg)
change (g)
% TGI
% TGI
by % TGI

















1
Control (untreated)


5.3

1.0



2
panitumumab
q3dx5; 6
 1 mg/mse
9.6
101
0.0002
A




ipa


3
panitumumab
q3dxp5; 6
 0.1 mg/mse
6.3
100
0.0002
A




ipa


4
E2-GS10-I1 (w/ PEG)
TIWx3; 6
100
−0.1
94
0.0005
A




ipa


5
E3-GS10-I1 (w/ PEG)
TIWx3; 6
100
9.5
28
0.416
I




ipa






aVehicle was phosphate buffered saline.



Abbreviations used are as follows:


ip, intraperitoneal route;


% TGI, relative % tumor growth inhibition calculated as % TGI = [(Ct − Tt)/(Ct − C0)] × 100 where Ct = median tumor weight of control mice at time t in days after tumor implant, Tt = median tumor weight of treated mice at time t, C0 = median tumor weight of control mice at time 0.


% TGI value was calculated at two points as the average inhibition of Day 12 and Day20. Outcome, a treatment regimen was considered active if it produced a statistically significant % TGI value of >50%;


q3dx5; 6, compound was administered every three days for five doses starting on the sixth day after tumor implant;


TIWx3; 6, compound was administered three times a week for three weeks starting on the sixth day after tumor implant.


p values were calculated on Day 20 relative to the control group in a two tailed paired analysis with 8 measurements per group.


Outcome by % TGI, A = active and I = inactive.






Pharmacodynamic Endpoints from the H292 Tumor Study.


Samples of tumors from untreated control, panitumumab and E/I binder treated groups were analyzed for levels of phosphorylated EGFR, ErbB2 and IGFR that would indicate target suppression. Tumors were also analyzed for levels of total EGFR to determine if EGF receptor degradation occurred. On day 20, a final treatment was administered and tumors were removed from 2 animals at 1 hour after dosing, 3 animals at 4 hours after dosing and 3 animals at 24 hours after dosing. All treatments showed marked suppression of phosphorylated EGFR and ErbB2 while the basal levels of phosphorylated IGFR were too low to discern a difference in this study (FIG. 13). All treatments showed a reduction in the amount of total EGFR indicating degradation of the receptor had occurred.


Example 13
Selection and Characterization of MCF7 Cells Resistant to IGF1R Inhibitor

MCF7 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Cat No. HTB-22, Manassas, Va.) were cultured in RPMI medium containing 10 mM hepes and 10% FBS at 37° C. in the presence of 5% CO2. The small molecule IGF1R inhibitor BMS-754807 was added to the culture medium and the concentration increased at stepwise increments over a period of 10 months until the cells exhibited continued proliferation in the presence of 200 mM BMS-754807. The resistant cells were designated MCF7r and the IC50 for BMS-754807 was 1239 nM compared to 120 nM for the parental MCF7 cells as measured in a proliferation assay carried out as previously described (Carboni et al., Cancer Res. 69: 161-170 (2009)). The drug was then removed from the culture medium and the MCF7r cells were passaged in complete medium for an additional 20 or 60 days to remove all traces of residual BMS-754807. Analysis of the MCF7r cells by immunoblotting revealed that EGFR was significantly overexpressed in the resistant cells compared to the parental MCF7 cells (FIG. 14). In addition, when MCF7 and MCF7r cells were serum starved and then stimulated with EGF for 7 minutes, phosphorylated EGFR could not be detected in the parental MCF7 cells (probably due to low levels of EGFR) but was strongly visible in MCF7r cells. In serum starved cells stimulated with IGF ligand, phosphorylated IGFR was seen in the parental MCF7 cells but despite the slightly higher levels of total IGFR present in the MCF7r cells almost no pIGFR was observed. This shows that the IGFR in the resistant MCF7r cells lost the ability to activate IGFR in response to IGF1 stimulation (FIG. 14). Activation of the MAP kinase pathway in response to EGF stimulation was stronger in the MCF7r cells as measured by pERK activation.


Example 14
Antitumor Studies in MCF7 and MCF7r Xenografts

MCF7r cells were scaled up in T75 flasks and isolated by centrifugation. Viable cell numbers were measured by trypan blue exclusion with a Vi-CELL XR (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, Calif.), resuspended in PBS to 5×106 viable cells/ml and implanted subcutaneously in the hind flank of athymic mice in a volume of 0.2 ml. For MCF7 and MCF7r tumor growth, all mice were supplemented with 0.25 mg 90 day release pellets of 17-β-estradiol (Innovative Research of America, Sarasota, Fla., Cat. No. NE-121). Tumors were propagated until they reached a median size of 500-1000 mg when they were excised and 1 mm3 fragments were reimplanted in the hind flank of new athymic mice. Tumors were adapted for solid tumor growth by serial trocar passage in mice through at least four rounds of growth during which tumor volume doubling time and take rate were monitored for each passage. Growth characteristics were observed to determine if the xenografts exhibited acceptable properties to serve as a reliable, reproducible model. The MCF7r tumor type demonstrated an acceptable take rate and doubling time and therefore satisfied the criteria for use as a xenograft model. The MCF7 parental tumor model had been previously established using the same techniques. For the MCF7 parental xenograft, 1 mm3 tumor fragments were implanted subcutaneously in the hind flank and allowed to establish to a size of 50-150 mg prior to initiation of treatment on Day 13 post-tumor implant. Cetuximab was obtained as marketed drug and administered i.p. at its optimal dose of 1 mg/mouse and at a lower dose of 0.1 mg/mouse on a Q3DX5 schedule (doses administered on Day 13, 16, 19, 22, 25). Mean tumor sizes calculated from groups of 8 mice are shown in FIG. 15A. In the MCF7 xenograft model, neither the 1 mg/mouse or the 0.1 mg/mouse dose of cetuximab was active by % TGI with values of −9% and 3.2%, respectively and the tumor sizes were not statistically different from the control group (Table 6).


For the MCF7r resistant xenograft, 1 mm3 tumor fragments were implanted subcutaneously in the hind flank and allowed to establish to a size of 50-150 mg prior to initiation of treatment on Day 6 post-tumor implant. Cetuximab was obtained as marketed drug and administered i.p. at its optimal dose of 1 mg/mouse and at a lower dose of 0.1 mg/mouse on a Q3DX5 schedule (doses administered on Day 6, 9, 12, 15, 18). Mean tumor sizes calculated from groups of 8 mice are shown in FIG. 15B. In the MCF7r xenograft model, doses of cetuximab were active by % TGI with values of 105% and 75%, respectively. The high dose of cetuximab had a TGI value over 100% which indicates that it caused tumor regression below the starting size at the initiation of treatment. Both doses resulted in a statistically significant difference in tumor size compared to the control group (Table 7).









TABLE 6







Results of the MCF7 human breast carcinoma tumor xenograft study.















Schedule,
Dose

p value for
Outcome


Group
Compound
Route
(mg/mouse)
% TGI
% TGI
by % TGI
















1
Control (untreated)



1.0



2
cetuximab
q3dx5; 13 ipa
  1 mg/mse
−9
0.223
I


3
cetuximab
q3dx5; 13 ipa
0.1 mg/mse
3.2
0.220
I






aVehicle was phosphate buffered saline.



Abbreviations used are as follows:


ip, intraperitoneal route;


% TGI, relative % tumor growth inhibition calculated as % TGI = [(Ct − Tt)/(Ct − C0)] × 100 where Ct = median tumor weight of control mice at time t in days after tumor implant, Tt = median tumor weight of treated mice at time t, C0 = median tumor weight of control mice at time 0.


% TGI value was calculated at three points as the average inhibition of Day 20, 24 and Day 27. Outcome, a treatment regimen was considered active if it produced a statistically significant % TGI value of >50%;


q3dx5; 13, compound was administered every three days for six doses starting on the thirteenth day after tumor implant.


p values were calculated on Day 24 relative to the control group in a two tailed paired analysis with 8 measurements per group.


Outcome by % TGI, A = active and I = inactive.













TABLE 7







Results of the MCF7r human breast carcinoma tumor xenograft study.















Schedule,
Dose

p value for
Outcome


Group
Compound
Route
(mg/kg)
% TGI
% TGI
by % TGI
















1
Control (untreated)



1.0



2
cetuximab
q3dx5; 6 ipa
  1 mg/mse
105
0.001
A


3
cetuximab
q3dx5; 6 ipa
0.1 mg/mse
 75
0.024
A





See footnotes to Table 6.


p values were calculated on Day 19 relative to the control group in a two tailed paired analysis with 8 measurements per group.






Example 15
Antitumor Studies in GEO Xenografts

GEO tumors were established by implanting 1 mm3 tumor fragments subcutaneously in the hind flank of athymic mice and allowing them to reach a size of 50-150 mg prior to initiation of treatment on Day 18 post-tumor implant. Cetuximab was administered ip at 0.25 mg/mouse on a Q3DX5 schedule (doses administered on Day 18, 21, 24, 27, 30). The IGFR kinase inhibitor BMS-754807 was administered at 25 mg/kg on a QDX21 schedule. Mean tumor sizes calculated from groups of 8 mice are shown in FIG. 16. Cetuximab was active at 0.25 mg/mouse with a % TGI value of 67%. BMS-754807 was active with a % TGI of 80% and the combination of the two was considerably more active then either agent alone with a % TGI of 94% (Table 8). All treatment groups were statistically different from the control group on Day 26 (Table 8).









TABLE 8







Results of the GEO human colon carcinoma tumor xenograft study.










Cetuximab












Dose
BMS-754807

















Schedule,
(mg/
Schedule,
Dose

p
Outcome



Group
Route
mouse)
Route
(mg/kg)
% TGI
value
by % TGI
Synergy





1
Control










(untreated)


2
q3dx5; 6 ipa
0.25 mg/


80

A





mse


3


qdx21; 18b
25
67

A



4
q3dx5; 6 ipa
0.25 mg/
qdx21; 18b
25
94

A
YES




mse






aVehicle for cetuximab was phosphate buffered saline. Vehicle for BMS-754807 was 50% polyethylene glycol 400, 50% water.



Abbreviations used are as described in Table 6 and synergy is defined as statistically significant activity that is better than either agent in the combination demonstrated on its own.


Outcome by % TGI, A = active and I = inactive.






Example 16
Antitumor Studies in H292 Xenografts

H292 cells were implanted subcutaneously in the hind flank of athymic mice as 1 mm3 fragments and allowed to establish to a size of 50-150 mg prior to initiation of treatment on Day 12 post-tumor implant. Cetuximab was administered ip at 0.1 mg/mouse on a Q3DX5 schedule. MAB391 is an antibody to IGF1R(R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn., Cat. No. MAB391) and was administered at a dose of 40 mg/kg on a BIWX3 schedule. Mean tumor sizes calculated from groups of 8 mice are shown in FIG. 17. Cetuximab was active at 0.1 mg/mouse with a % TGI value of 95.1% and MAB391 was inactive at 40 mg/kg with a % TGI value of 10.5% (Table 9). Mice dosed with the combination of cetuximab and MAB391 exhibited a % TGI value of 109.2% indicating tumor regression in the combination group (Table 9). After dosing ceased, tumors regrew in the cetuximab treated group more rapidly than in the group treated with the combination of cetuximab and MAB391 (FIG. 17).









TABLE 9







Results of the H292 human NSCLC tumor xenograft study.










Cetuximab












Dose
MAB391

















Schedule,
(mg/
Schedule,
Dose

p
Outcome



Group
Route
mouse)
Route
(mg/kg)
% TGI
value
by % TGI
Synergy





1
Control










(untreated)


2
q3dx5; 12 ipa
0.1 mg/


95.1

A





mse


3


BIWx3; 12a
40
10.5

I



4
q3dx5; 12 ipa
0.1 mg/
BIWx3; 12a
40
109.2 

A
YES




mse






aVehicle for cetuximab and MAB391 was phosphate buffered saline.



Abbreviations used are as described in Table 6 and 8.






Example 17
Colony Formation Assay

To determine the effects of test compounds on the ability to inhibit colony formation of H292 cells, 400 cells were seeded into 24-well plates (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, N.J., Cat. No. 351143) in complete medium and allowed to adhere overnight. The next day medium was removed and replaced with medium containing 2% FBS. Test compound was diluted into medium containing 2% FBS and added to cells in serial dilutions. Cells were incubated at 37° C. for 14 days. After 14 days, media was discarded and wells rinsed once with 2 ml PBS. Cells were stained with 0.5 ml Coomassie Stain Solution (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif., Cat. No. 161-0436) for 20 min. The stain was aspirated and wells were washed quickly with 1× Destain Solution Coomassie R-250 (Bio-Rad, Cat. No. 161-0438). A final rinse with 1 ml water per well was carried out and plates were inverted and allowed to dry. Colonies consisting of (at least) 50 cells or larger were counted by eye under low power magnification (10×-20×). All samples were tested in triplicate and IC50 values were calculated from linear regression of the percent inhibition of control. Representative results for a PEGylated E/I binder are shown in FIG. 18 and IC50 values for various E/I 10Fn3-based binders, monospecific IGF1R 10Fn3-based binder, and EGFR antibody is shown in Table 10.









TABLE 10







IC50 values of various E/I 10Fn3-based


binders, monospecific


IGF1R 10Fn3-based binder, and EGFR


antibody in the colony formation assay.











IC50



SAMPLE
(nM)














E4-GS10-I1 (with Peg)
5



I1-GS10-E5 (with Peg)
1



I1-GS10-E4
6



E2-GS10-I1 (with Peg)
560



I1 monomer (with Peg)
15.510



panitumumab
140










Example 18
Epitope Mapping Assay

An epitope mapping assay was developed utilizing commercially available antibodies where the binding site on the EGFR extracellular domain is roughly known according to various literature reports. The antibodies used in this assay are listed in Table 11 and FIG. 19A depicts how antibodies were localized to approximate binding domains on EGFR. The assay is a variation of the In Cell Western assay previously described and assesses the ability of EGFR 10Fn3-based binders preincubated with A431 or other cells expressing EGFR to block binding of the detection antibodies from the panel listed in Table 11. The assay was carried out as follows: A431 cells in log phase growth were harvested by trypsinization and seeded in a 96 well plate at 24,000 cells/well in a total volume of 100 μl/well. The next day, media was dumped and the EGFR 10Fn3-based binders diluted in cold DMEM base media were added to the plate and allowed to bind for 1 hour at 4° C. to prevent internalization of EGFR. After binding, cells were washed with 0.2 ml PBS+0.1% Tween-20 and fixed for 20 minutes in PBS+3.7% formaldehyde at room temp. Cells were blocked in 0.2 ml of Odyssey blocking buffer for 1 hour at room temp. Next, primary antibodies were diluted in 50 μl of Odyssey blocker per well and incubated for 1-2 hours at room temp. Primary antibodies were dumped by inverting the plate, and each well washed 3× with 200 μl of PBS+0.1% Tween-20. Secondary antibodies are the same ones used in the In Cell Western assay and were appropriate for the species of antibody being detected. These secondary antibodies were diluted (1:800) in Odyssey Blocker+0.2% Tween-20 and added in a volume of 50 μl per well along with TOPRO3 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif., cat#T3605) diluted at (1:3000) to counterstain cells for normalization. Cells were incubated on bench for 1 hour at room temp. Secondary antibody was dumped out and each well washed 4× with 200 μl of PBS+0.1% Tween-20 for 5 minutes at room temp. Plates were imaged on a Licor instrument at 160 μm resolution, medium quality, focus offset of 3 mm, intensity of 5. This assay was also carried out with the marketed drug antibodies cetuximab, panitumumab and nimotuzumab to determine if the EGFR 10Fn3-based binders were interfering with their binding to EGFR on A431 cells. Representative results are shown in FIG. 19B.









TABLE 11







Commercially available antibodies to the extracellular domain of EGFR.



















Binding



Clone
SUPPLIER and cat#
SPECIES
BINDS
EPITOPE
motif

















1

Abcam ab38165
Rab
h
Peptide AA 42-58
linear


2
E234
Abcam ab32198
Rab
h, mu, rat
Peptide AA 40-80 (No ICC)
linear


3
N-20
Santa Cruz#31155
Goat IgG
h
AA 110-160
linear


4
ICR10
Abcam ab231
Rat IgG2a
h(HN5)
AA 124-176b, neutralizinge
conf




Santa Cruz #57095


5
EGFR1
Abcam ab30
Mu IgG1
h(A431)
AA 176-294, neutralizingb
conf




Chemicon MAB88910


ab30&MAB88910@(1 mg/ml)




Labvision MS-311


6
199.12
Labvision MS-396-P
Mu IgG2a
h
AA 124-176, non-neutralizingb
conf


7
LA22
Upstate 05-104
Mu IgG2a
h(A431)
AA 351-364, neutralizinga
linear


8

Abcam ab15669
Rab
Mu, rat
Peptide AA376-394d
linear


9
225
Sigma E2156
Mu IgG1
h(A431)
AA 294-475, neutralizingb,c
conf




Labvision MS-269-P


10
528
Abcam ab3103
Mu IgG2a
h(A431)
AA 294-475, neutralizingb,c
conf




Santa Cruz#120




Labvision MS-268-P


11
B1D8
Labvision MS-666-P
Mu IgG2a
h(A431)
AA 294-475b
conf


12
LA1
Upstate 05-101
Mu IgG1
h
neutralizing


13
H11
Labvision MS-316-P
Mu IgG1
h
AA 294-475, non-neutralizingb
linear


14
111.6
Labvision MS-378-P
Mu IgG1
h
AA 294-475, neutralizingb
linear




Imgenex IMG-80179


15
 29.1
Sigma E2760
Mu IgG1
h(A431)
External carbohydrate non-




Abcam ab10414


neutralizing





Abbreviations:


conf: epitope conformationally specific;


linear: epitope independent of conformation.



aJBC 264(1989)17469 Ala351-Asp364,




bJ Immunological Methods 287(2004)147,




cMol Biol Med1(1983)511,




dRaised against a peptide to mouse EGFR [FKGDSFTRTPPLDPRELEI (SEQ ID NO: 491)],




eInt J Oncol 4(1994)277.




f[EEKKVCQGTSNKLTQLGTFEDHFLSLQRMFNNCEVVLGNLEITYVQRNYDLSFLKTIQEVAGYVLIALNTVERIPLENLQIIRGNMYYENSYALAVLSNY (SEQ ID NO: 492)],




gIle-Gln-Cys-Ala-His-Tyr-Ile-Asp-Gly-Pro-His-Cys (SEQ ID NO: 493) (amino acids 580-591).




hCancer Cell 7(2005)301.







Using various approaches, we have confirmed that the EGFR monomer E3 binds to domain I of EGFR. Since other E monomers have similar properties in various experiments, it is thought that the other E monomers also bind to domain I of EGFR.


Example 19
Properties of I Monomers

BIAcore Analysis of the Soluble Fibronectin-Based Scaffold Proteins


The kinetics of I monomers binding to the target was measured using BIAcore 2000 or 3000 biosensors (Pharmacia Biosensor). A capture assay was developed utilizing an IGF-1R-Fc fusion. A similar reagent had been described by Forbes et al. (Forbes et al. 2002, European J. Biochemistry, 269, 961-968). The extracellular domain of human IGF-IR (aa 1-932) was cloned into a mammalian expression vector containing the hinge and constant regions of human IgG1. Transient transfection of the plasmid produced a fusion protein, IGF-1R-Fc which was subsequently purified by Protein A chromatography and captured on Protein A immobilized on Biasensor CM5 chips by amine coupling. The kinetic analysis involved the capture of IGF-1R-Fc on Protein A followed by injection of the fibronectin-based scaffold protein in solution and regeneration of the Protein A surface by glycine pH 2.0. Sensorgrams were obtained at each concentration and were evaluated using a program Biaevaluation, BIA Evaluation 2.0 (BIAcore), to determine the rate constants ka (kon) and kd (koff) The dissociation constant, KD was calculated from the ratio of rate constants koff/kon. Typically, a concentration series (2 uM to 0 uM) of purified fibronectin-based scaffold protein was evaluated for binding to protein A captured human IGF-1R-Fc fusion protein.


For experiments determining binding to human insulin receptor, recombinant human insulin receptor (IR) and recombinant human VEGF-R2-Fc were directly coupled to a CM5 Biasensor chip by amine group linkage following standard procedures recommended by Biacore (Uppsala, Sweden). In brief, 60 ug/mL of IR diluted in acetate 4.5 was coupled/immobilized to a level of 8300 RU and 11.9 ug/mL of VEGF-R2-Fc diluted in acetate 5.0 was immobilized to a level of 9700 RU on flow cells 2 and 3. A blank reference surface was prepared on FC1. Specific binding to either IR or VEGF-R2-Fc was calculated by subtracting the binding observed to the blank reference flow cell 1. Fibronectin-based scaffold proteins were diluted to 10 uM in HBS-EP (10 mM Hepes, 150 mM NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, 0.05% Surfactant P20) and injected at 20 uL/min for 3 minutes over the flow cells at 25° C. and dissociation was observed over 10 mins.


Cell-Based Receptor Blocking Assay


The human breast adenocarcinoma MCF-7 (ATCC, Manassas, Va.) was plated in 24 well plates at a concentration of 50,000 cells per well in RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, Logan, Utah). The following day, cells were washed in binding buffer consisting of RPMI 1640 containing 0.1% BSA (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), and then pre-incubated for 30 minutes on ice in 200 μL binding buffer containing IGF-IR competitor. After the pre-incubation period, 40 pM [125I]-IGF-I (Perkin Elmer, Wellesley, Mass.), equivalent to approximately 60000 counts per minute, was added to each well and allowed to incubate for an additional three hours on ice with gentle agitation. The wells were then washed with ice cold PBS containing 0.1% BSA. Cells were lysed with 500 μL buffer consisting of 0.1% SDS+0.5 N NaOH. Radioactivity of the lysates was measured using a Wallac 1470 Gamma Counter (Perkin Elmer, Wellesley, Mass.), and the data were analyzed using SigmaPlot (Systat Software, Point Richmond, Calif.).


pIGFR Assay


Fibronectin-based scaffold proteins fused to Fc were evaluated for their ability to inhibit IGF-1R phosphorylation in Rh41 human rhabdomyosarcoma cells. A Western Blot was employed to assess the ability of the I monomer to inhibit IGF-1R phosphorylation in Rh41 human rhabdomyosarcoma cells. Cells were stimulated with IGF-I, IGF-II, insulin ligands (50 ng/ml), or no stimulation (NS) and then treated with various concentrations of the I monomer. Membranes were probed with phospho-specific antibodies.


Cellular Proliferation in Rh41 (Human Rhabdomyosarcoma and H929 Human Multiple Myeloma)


Proliferation was evaluated by incorporation of [3H]-thymidine into DNA after a 72 hour exposure to reagents. Rh41 cells were plated at a density of 3500 cells/well in 96-well microtiter plates and 24 hours later they were exposed to a range of I monomer concentrations. After 72 hours incubation at 37° C., cells were pulsed with 4 μCi/ml [3H] thymidine (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, UK) for 3 hours, trypsinized, harvested onto UniFilter-96, GF/B plates (PerkinElmer, Boston, Mass.) and scintillation was measured on a TopCount NXT (Packard, Conn.). Results are expressed as an IC50, which is the drug concentration required to inhibit cell proliferation by 50% to that of untreated control cells Data represents the average of triplicate wells with standard deviations shown.


Results of the characterization of the I monomer are shown below in Table 12.









TABLE 12







Properties of I monomers.


IGFR















Inhibition of



BIAcore
Neutralizes
Inhibition of
RH41



KD
IGF Binding
pIGFR
Proliferation


Monomer
IC50
IC50
IC50
IC50





I1
0.11 nM
8 nM
0.2 nM
28 nM









Example 20
Additional Characteristics of Monospecific and Bispecific EGFR and IGF-IR 10Fn3-Based Binders


10Fn3-based binders that bound either EGFR or IGF-IR were identified using the biochemical selection technique of mRNA display in which a protein is covalently attached to its coding nucleic acid sequences. 10Fn3-based proteins-mRNA fusion populations that bound either IGF-IR or EGFR when the receptors were presented at concentrations from 1 to 10 nM were cloned into E. coli and expressed as 10Fn3-based proteins. A subset of target binders that blocked EGFR or IGF-IR signaling and had suitable biophysical properties were identified (Table 13). These initial clones were optimized for target binding affinity and cellular potency with additional mRNA selection at increasingly lower target concentrations and selection for lower dissociation rate constants. IC50 values obtained during the selection procedures ranged from 9 to 304 nM, illustrating the opportunity for choosing molecules from a wide range of potency values for the construction of bi-specific 10Fn3-based binders. EGFR 10Fn3-based binders were tested by In-Cell Western screening assays for the blockade of phosphorylation of EGFR and ERK, a downstream signaling molecule of EGFR activation (methods similar to Example 1). Analogous studies were performed on optimized IGF-IR binders. Optimized EGFR-binding clones (E3, E1, and E2) inhibited EGFR phosphorylation on Y1068 and downstream phosphorylation of ERK on Y204 of p42/p44 in vitro with IC50 values ranging from 9 to 40 nM, potencies that were more than 100-fold higher than the parental EGFR clone (Table 13, methods similar to Example 1).


I1 bound to IGF-IR with a KD value of 0.11 nM and inhibited IGF-1-stimulated IGF-IR phosphorylation with an IC50 of 0.2 nM (Table 13, methods similar to Example 6). The optimized IGF-IR and EGFR single-domain 10Fn3-based binders were >95% monomeric based on size exclusion chromatography, had melting temperatures >56° C. (Table 13, methods similar to Example 4), and exhibited minimal immunogenic potential as predicted from EpiMatrix (<7 for five out of six loops), a matrix-based algorithm for T-cell epitope mapping (De Groot A S, Moise L (2007) Prediction of immunogenicity for therapeutic proteins: state of the art. Curr Opin Drug Discovery Devel 10:332-340). The 10Fn3-based binders E1, E2, and E3 were selected for further development, and had EGFR binding constants in the range of 0.7 to 10 nM as determined from Biacore assay (Table 13, methods similar to Example 5). EGFR-binding of these 10Fn3-based binders was competitive for EGF binding to EGFR (Table 13) as measured by a displacement assay using Europium labeled EGF (methods similar to Example 10). Similarly, IGF-I binding to IGF-IR was inhibited by I1 (Table 13, methods similar to Example 19).


Biophysical Characterization of Bi-Specific 10Fn3-based binders. Tm values of selected E/I 10Fn3-based binders ranged from 49-58° C. and their SEC profiles indicated the protein was >90% monomer (Table 14, methods similar to Example 4). Monospecific 10Fn3-based binders and E/I 10Fn3-based binders showed comparable binding affinities, although Tm values decreased slightly when the single domain 10Fn3-based binders were linked together (Tables 13 and 14). To increase serum half life for in vivo applications, E/I 10Fn3-based binders were PEGylated with a 40 kDa branched PEG (methods similar to Example 3). PEGylation of E/I 10Fn3-based binders resulted in a 10- to 20-fold reduction of binding affinity relative to the un-PEGylated constructs due to decreased association rate constants but did not decrease Tm. Furthermore, PEGylation did not markedly reduce inhibition of EGFR/IGF-IR phosphorylation in cells. The PEGylated E-I orientation (wherein the EGFR binder is at the N terminus, and IGF1R is at the C terminus) exhibited slightly lower IC50 values for the inhibition of EGFR and IGF-IR phosphorylation by ELISA compared to the I-E orientation. While minor differences in the KD values and biological activity were found between PEGylated E-I orientation, vs the I-E orientation, there were no consistent trends.









TABLE 13







Properties of Monospecific 10Fn3-based binders Relevant to the Construction of


E/I 10Fn3-based binders.





















A431
A431








EGFR
IGF-IR
pEGFR
pERK
H292
H292
Competition



Tm
SEC
KD
KD
IC50,
IC50,
pEGFR
pIGF-IR
EGFR/IGF-IR


Name
° C.
Monomer %
nM
nM
nM
nM
IC50, nM
IC50, nM
IC50, nM



















E-
56
ND
42.5

2580
2370
1148 ± 21 
ND
  29 ± 12.73


parent


E3
60
>80
3.4
NA
15 ± 8
11 ± 7
22 ± 1
>7000
4.75 ± 1.77


E1
64
>95
9.92
NA
24 ± 7
13 ± 3
 9 ± 2
>3400
15.9 ± 2.97


E2
72
>95
0.7
NA
 38 ± 15
40 ± 9
31 ± 1
>3400
 9.4 ± 3.68


I-
ND
ND
NA
1.8 
ND
ND
ND
ND
13**


parent


I1
61.5
>95
>6210
0.11
NA
NA
NA
0.2
 8**





ND, not done;


NA, not applicable;


SEC, size exclusion chromatography.


*IC50 values for EGFR and ERK phosphorylation levles in A431 cells were determined by In-Cell Western assay (ICW). Phosphorylation levels of EGFR and IGF-IR in H292 cells were determined by Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).


**Competition for IGF-IR binding. Standard deviations are from 3-6 experiments.













TABLE 14







Properties of the E/I 10Fn3-based binders.


















IGF-

H292
A431







IR
H292
pIGF-IR
pERK
A431
EGF-EGFR



Tm
EGFR
KD
pEGFR
IC50,
IC50,
pEGFR
Competition


Name
° C.
KD nM
nM
IC50, nM
nM
nM
IC50, nM
IC50, nM


















E3-GS10-I1
52
0.7
0.1
7
6
12
14
 25 ± 6.5


E3-GS10-
52.5
10.4
0.74
10
6
40
42
 80.5 ± 12.02


I1-PEG


E1-GS10-I1
48
3.8
0.8
30
1
51
36
51


E1-GS10-
49
57.9
2.4
123
4
295
297
396 ± 223


I1-PEG


E2-GS10-I1
56
0.5
0.2
8
0.1
20
19
 2.1 ± 0.57


E2-GS10-
57.5
10.1
1.17
32
0.3
78
77
56.5 ± 24.5


I1-PEG


I1-GS10-
60
3.6
0.46
47
0.8
118
97
 128 ± 4.95


E2-PEG





Tm measurements are from thermal scanning flurometry.


KD values are from Biacore binding assays using recombinant EGFR or IGF-IR domains adsorbed on the chip.


In-Cell Western assays (ICW) were conducted to determine the ability of EI-Tandems to inhibit the phosphorylation of EGFR or ERK in A431 cells.


Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) were used to determine the phosphorylation of EGFR or IGF-IR in H292 cells.






Example 21
Species Cross-Reactivity of E/I 10Fn3-Based Binders

Pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders were analyzed for their binding affinities to EGFR from mouse, rat and monkey using surface plasmon resonance (BIAcore) analysis (methods identical to Example 5). Mouse EGFR was purchased from R&D systems (Minneapolis, Minn.), rat EGFR was produced in house, and monkey EGFR was purchased from KEMP (Frederick, Md.)


As shown in Table 15, all pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders bound to mouse, rat and monkey EGFR with low nanomolar affinities indicating that all pegylated E/I binders are cross-reactive with human, mouse, rat and monkey EGFR.












TABLE 15






KD (nM)
KD (nM)
KD (nM)


Analyte
(mouse EGFR)
(rat EGFR)
(monkey EGFR)


















I1-GS10-E105
2.7
2.9
4.4


(pegylated)





I1-GS10-E5
3.4
3.6
5.1


(pegylated)





I1-GS10-E4
5.5
3.7
3.9


(pegylated)





E4-GS10-I1
6.9
5.6
5.7


(pegylated)





E2-GS10-I1
9.6
9.6
18.0


(pegylated)





I1-GS10-E85
13.9
10.7
7.0


(pegylated)









Example 22
Characterization of Additional E/I 10Fn3-Based Binders


FIG. 43 summarizes various characteristics of additional E/I 10Fn3-based binders.


The pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders were tested to determine inhibition of EGF induced EGFR and ERK phosphorylation in A431, using methods as previously described in Example 1. Results demonstrated that the pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders inhibited EGF induced EGFR phosphorylation with IC50's ranging from 12 nM-297 nM and phosphorylation of ERK with IC50's ranging from 12 nM-295 nM (FIG. 43, columns a and b).


The ability of the pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders to inhibit IGFR and EGFR activity was also examined in H292 cells using methods previously described in Examples 6 and 7. Results indicated that the pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders inhibited IGFR activity with IC50's ranging from 0.2 nM-6 nM (FIG. 43, column d) and inhibited EGFR activity with IC50's ranging from 1.3 nM-123 nM (FIG. 43, columns c).


The pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders were tested to determine if they could induce degradation of EGFR and IGFR in Difi cells as shown in columns e and f of FIG. 43. Cells were treated with 1 uM of pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders and harvested at time points starting at 7 hrs and ending at 120 hrs and levels of EGFR and IGF1R were determine by Western blot analysis. The strength of degradation was scored as either (+) indicating the tandem degraded that receptor but the degradation was not sustained and receptor expression reappeared during the time course or (++) which indicates the tandem degraded the receptor and sustained that degradation throughout the time course. Results (FIG. 43, column e and f) demonstrated that the pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders displayed various patterns of EGFR and IGF1R degradation; degradation of only IGFR, degradation of both EGFR and IGFR or no degradation of either receptor. No tandem tested displayed the ability to degrade only EGFR.


The binding affinity of the pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders for EGFR and IGF1R was assessed by surface Plasmon resonance (BIAcore) analysis as previously described in Example 5. Results demonstrated that the pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders bound to EGFR with affinities ranging between 3.35 nM-57.9 nM and bound to IGF1R with affinities ranging between 0.37 nM-2.43 nM (FIG. 43, columns g and h).


The pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders were tested to determine their potency for blocking EGF binding to EGFR on the surface of A431 cells using methods previously described in Example 10. The pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders blocked EGF binding to A431 cells with IC50's ranging from 19.5 nM to 238 nM (FIG. 43, column i).


The pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders were assessed for their ability to inhibit colony formation of H292 cells using methods described in Example 17. As shown in FIG. 43, column j, the pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders inhibited colony formation with IC50 values ranging from 1 nM-560 nM and three of the four pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders tested were 23-140 fold more potent than the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody panitumumab. The fourth pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders was 4 fold less potent than panitumuab. The pegylated I1 monomer was only marginally active in inhibiting colony formation in H292 with an IC50>15 uM and this is expected since H292 cell growth is predominantly driven by EGFR signaling and not IGF1R signaling.


The melting temperature was assessed for pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders by DSC (as previously described in Example 4) or thermal dye melt methodology. For thermal dye melt assessment, the pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders were diluted to 0.2 mg/mL in 50 mM NaAc buffer pH 4.5. Each sample was spiked with 1 uL of the 200× Sypro Orange in DMSO buffer for a final concentration of 0.5% dye. Each sample was loaded into the 96 well tray and coated with 5 uL of silicone oil. The tray was spun down at 1,000 RPM and loaded onto the Bio-Rad CFX96 system and the following method was selected: 25° C. for 10 minutes+Plate Read 25° C. to 95° C.@0.5° C. increments for 15 minutes+Plate Read. Data analysis was performed for the inflection point with the CFX software. As shown in FIG. 43, column k, all pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders had similar Tm measurements, ranging from 49-62.5 degrees celsius. Tm measurements for the pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders were independent of concentration and remained consistent at all concentrations tested. DSC analysis of an exemplary binder, I1-GS10-E5 pegylated, measured with a scan range of 15-95° C. at 1 mg/ml protein concentration in PBS, resulted in a Tm measurement of 55.2° C. as shown in FIG. 20.


Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) was performed on the pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders as previously described in Example 4. SEC analysis revealed that all of the pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders were >95% monomeric as shown in FIG. 43 (column 1 of Table).


Example 23
Biochemical and Biophysical Properties of E/I 10Fn3-Based Binder I1-GS10-E5 Pegylated with Selected Amino Acid Changes

I1-GS10-E5 pegylated was constructed without the 6HIS tag (SEQ ID NO: 487) and also with various alterations to the linker region. In addition, a global change was made to all the constructs wherein the C-terminal tail of the first monomer had a single point change of the aspartic acid to glutamic acid (D to an E). Several clones were made with selected serine residues mutated to cysteines (S to C) to provide for alternate PEGylation sites. The effect of these changes on biochemical and biophysical properties of the molecule were compared and are summarized in Table 16. Methods for measuring inhibition of pEGFR are described in Example 7, pIGFR in Example 6, pERK in Example 1, Tm in Example 4, EGFR and IGFR KD in Example 5. Detailed analysis of the binding kinetics were also carried out on these clones and are presented in Tables 17 and 18 (using methods similar to those described in Example 5).
















TABLE 16






pEGFR
pIGFR
pERK

EGFR
IGFR




IC50
IC50
IC50
Tm
KD
KD
SEC %


CLONE NAME
(nM)
(nM)
(nM)
(° C.)
(nM)
(nM)
mono






















I1-GS10-E5 pegylated
28
2.2
12
56
2.7
0.25
96


I1-GS10-E5
30
1.2
11
56.8
Sticky(9)
0.23
94.1


pegylated(1)


I1-GSGCGS8-E5(3)
19.8
1.4
8
54.8
4
0.29
95.2


I1-GS10-E5-GSGC(4)
28.7
1.2
19
55
1.4
0.25
92.7


I1 (S62C)-GS10-E5(5)
21
1.9
10
55.5
8.7
0.7
97.45


I1-GS10-E5 (S62C)(6)
68.4
2.2
30
56
1.7
0.26
96.12


I1 (S91C)-GS10-E5(7)
22.7
6.2
15
52
17
7.16
95.98


I1-GS10-E5(S91C)(8)
22.6
2.1
29
50.5
17.9
0.28
93.39






(1)No His Tag was used for this construct.




(2)a global change was made to all the alternative constructs of I1-GS10-E5 pegylated, wherein the C-terminal tail of the first monomer had a single point change of aspartic acid to glutamic acid (D to an E).




(3)The I1 mononer linked with GSGC (SEQ ID NO: 489) plus GS8 (SEQ ID NO: 494), to E5.




(4)I1 linked with GS10 to E5 with GSGC (SEQ ID NO: 489) at the tail of E5.




(5)I1 linked with GS10 to E5, wherein the I1 has a single point change of serine to cysteine at position 62.




(6)I1 linked with GS10 to E5, wherein the E5 has a single point change of serine to cysteine at position 62.




(7)I1 linked with GS10 to E5, wherein the I1 has a single point change of serine to cysteine at position 91.




(8)I1 linked with GS10 to E5, wherein the E5 has a single point change of serine to cysteine at position 91.




(9)This construct demonstrated non-specific binding to the flow cell so an accurate determination of affinity was not possible in this experiment.














TABLE 17







Biacore binding of altered I1-GS10-E5 Pegylated clones to EGFR645-Fc.













Description
ka (1/Ms)
kd (1/s)
Kd (nm)
Δka (fold)
Δkd (fold)
ΔKd (fold)





I1-GS10-E5 Pegylated
2.93 ± 0.67E+04
7.24 ± 3.14E−0 5
2.69 ± 1.53





I1-GS10-E5 pegylated
2.27E+04
1.49E−04
6.6
0.8
0.5
0.4








I1-GS10-E5 pegylated(1)
Non-specific binding to reference cell surface at higher analyte



concentrations (600 nM, 200 nM prohibited kinetic value determination)













ALTERNATIVE CLONES(2)








I1-GSGCGS8-E5(3)
2.94E+04
1.18E−04
4.0
1.0
0.6
0.7


I1-GS10-E5-GSGC(4)
3.34E+04
4.52E−05
1.4
1.1
1.6
2.0


I1(S62C)-GS10-E5(5)
2.28E+04
1.99E−04
8.7
0.8
0.4
0.3


I1-GS10-E5(S62C)(6)
1.78E+04
3.04E−05
1.7
0.6
2.4
1.6


I1(S91C)-GS10-E5(7)
1.96E+04
3.34E−04
17.0
0.7
0.2
0.2


I1-GS10-E5(S91C)(8)
1.08E+04
1.93E−04
17.9
0.4
0.4
0.2






(1)No His Tag was used for this construct.




(2)a global change was made to all the alternative constructs of I1-GS10-E5 pegylated, wherein the C-terminal tail of the first monomer had a single point change of aspartic acid to glutamic acid (D to an E).




(3)The I1 mononer linked with GSGC (SEQ ID NO: 489) plus GS8 (SEQ ID NO: 494), to E5.




(4)I1 linked with GS10 to E5 with GSGC (SEQ ID NO: 489) at the tail of E5.




(5)I1 linked with GS10 to E5, wherein the I1 has a single point change of serine to cysteine at position 62.




(6)I1 linked with GS10 to E5, wherein the E5 has a single point change of serine to cysteine at position 62.




(7)I1 linked with GS10 to E5, wherein the I1 has a single point change of serine to cysteine at position 91.




(8)I1 linked with GS10 to E5, wherein the E5 has a single point change of serine to cysteine at position 91.














TABLE 18







Biacore binding of altered I1-GS10-E5 Pegylated clones to IGF1R-Fc.













Description
ka (1/Ms)
kd (1/s)
Kd (nm)
Δka (fold)
Δkd (fold)
ΔKd (fold)





I1-GS10-E5 pegylated
1.04 ± 0.04E+06
2.62 ± 0.21E−04
0.25 ± 0.01





I1-GS10-E5 pegylated
1.10E+06
2.78E−04
0.25
1.1
0.9
1.0


I1-GS10-E5 pegylated(1)
1.28E+06,
2.88E−04,
0.22, 0.23
1.2
0.9
1.1



1.22E+06
2.76E−04


ALTERNATIVE CLONES(2)


I1-GSGCGS8-E5(3)
8.52E+05
2.45E−04
0.29
0.8
1.1
0.9


I1-GS10-E5-GSGC(4)
1.07E+06
2.65E−04
0.25
1.0
1.0
1.0


I1(S62C)-GS10-E5(5)
3.34E+05
2.34E−04
0.70
0.3
1.1
0.4


I1-GS10-E5(S62C)(6)
1.07E+06
2.79E−04
0.26
1.0
0.9
1.0


I1(S91C)-GS10-E5(7)
8.22E+04
5.89E−04
7.16
0.1
0.4
 0.04


I1-GS10-E5(S91C)(8)
9.86E+05
2.81E−04
0.28
0.9
0.9
0.9






(1)No His Tag was used for this construct.




(2)a global change was made to all the alternative constructsof I1-GS10-E5 pegylated, wherein the C-terminal tail of the first monomer had a single point change of aspartic acid to glutamic acid (D to an E).




(3)The I1 mononer linked with GSGC (SEQ ID NO: 489) plus GS8 (SEQ ID NO: 494), to E5.




(4)I1 linked with GS10 to E5 with GSGC (SEQ ID NO: 489) at the tail of E5.




(5)I1 linked with GS10 to E5, wherein the I1 has a single point change of serine to cysteine at position 62.




(6)I1 linked with GS10 to E5, wherein the E5 has a single point change of serine to cysteine at position 62.




(7)I1 linked with GS10 to E5, wherein the I1 has a single point change of serine to cysteine at position 91.




(8)I1 linked with GS10 to E5, wherein the E5 has a single point change of serine to cysteine at position 91.







Example 24
Inhibition of Shared Downstream Signaling Pathways of EGFR and IGFR

Inhibition of downstream signaling pathways were analyzed with a pAKT ELISA identical to those previously described in Example 8. Results of this study demonstrate that I1-GS10-E5 pegylated is more potent than I1 pegylated alone at blocking IGF1-stimulated AKT activation in H292 cells. E5 pegylated, the EGFR monospecific binder alone did not efficiently prevent activation of AKT by IGF1 stimulation (FIG. 21).


Example 25
Inhibition of Cell Proliferation by 10Fn3-Based Binders and Comparator Antibody

H292 and RH41 cell proliferation experiments were conducted as described in Example 9. The EGFR monospecific 10Fn3-based binder E5-pegylated inhibited proliferation of H292 cells with an IC50 value of 0.016 μM. The IGFR monospecific 10Fn3-based binder I1-pegylated had an IC50 value of >8.4 μM while the E/I 10Fn3-based binder I1-GS10-E5 pegylated was slightly more potent with an IC50 value of 0.006 μM (FIG. 22). The H292 cell line is of lung cancer origin and sensitive to inhibition of IGFR and EGFR ((Akashi Y, et al. (2008) Enhancement of the antitumor activity of ionising radiation by nimotuzumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody to the epidermal growth factor receptor, in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines of differing epidermal growth factor receptor status. Br. J. Cancer 98:749-755; and Buck E, et al. (2008) Feedback mechanisms promote cooperativity for small molecule inhibitors of epidermal and insulin-like growth factor receptors. Cancer Res. 68:8322-8332.)) In contrast, only the I1-GS10-E5 pegylated binder and the I1-pegylated binder inhibited the proliferation of RH41 cells (IC50 values were 0.0002 and 0.0004 μM, respectively, FIG. 23). This was expected, since RH41 is a pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma cell line that is known to be driven predominantly by IGFR signaling ((Huang F, et al. (2009). The mechanisms of differential sensitivity to an insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor inhibitor (BMS-536924) and rationale for combining with EGFR/HER2 inhibitors. Cancer Res. 69:161-170)) and thus not sensitive to EGFR blockade.


Example 26
Inhibition of Receptor Activation and Downstream Signaling In Vitro by Pegylated and Non-Pegylated 10Fn3-Based Binders

In order to understand the dynamics of EGFR/IGFR signaling and its inhibition by I1-GS10-E5 pegylated, DiFi, H292 or BxPC3 cells were serum-starved, exposed to 1 μM or 0.1 μM E5 pegylated, I1 pegylated, or I1-GS10-E5 pegylated, or vehicle control for 2 hours, then stimulated with either EGF, IGF-I, or EGF+IGF-I for 10 min.


Cells were cultured in vitro, serum starved overnight and then exposed to 10Fn3-based binders for 2 hours prior to stimulation with 100 ng/ml of EGF or IGF. Cell lysates were prepared in lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 5% glycerol, 0.15 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail Tablets [Roche, Indianapolis, Ind.] and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail 2 [Sigma-Aldrich Corp.]). Lysates (30 μg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to membranes, and immunoblotted with antibodies to phospho-EGFR and total EGFR (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Carlsbad, Calif.), phospho-AKT (Ser 473), phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204) (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, Mass.), or total actin (Chemicon International, Temecula, Calif.) in Odyssey Blocking Buffer with 0.1% Tween 20 (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, Nebr.). Membranes were incubated with the appropriate secondary antibodies. Protein visualization was performed using a LI-COR Biosciences Odyssey infrared imaging system.


As shown in FIG. 24, the basal levels of phosphorylated EGFR, IGF-IR, and AKT were nearly undetectable after serum deprivation. In DiFi cells, neither I1-GS10-E5 pegylated or E5 pegylated (monospecific EGFR binder) are able to completely suppress EGF-stimulated EGFR phosphorylation. In H292 and BxPC3 cells there is strong inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation by both I1-GS10-E5 pegylated and E5 pegylated. In DiFi and BxPC3 cells, I1-GS10-E5 pegylated blocks IGF-stimulated IGFR phosphorylation more than I1 pegylated (monospeciific IGFR binder) by itself. In H292 cells, IGF-stimulation cross activates the EGFR only when EGFR is blocked. I1-GS10-E5 pegylated inhibited EGF-stimulated pAKT in DiFi; increased pAKT in EGF-stimulated H292 and in BxPC3 EGF did not activate pAKT. In DiFi, H292 and BxPC3 cells I1-GS10-E5 pegylated inhibited IGF-stimulated pIGFR more than the individual E5 pegylated and I1 pegylated by themselves. I1-GS10-E5 pegylated had very little if any effect on EGF-stimulated pERK in DiFi, H292 or BxPC3. IGF-stimulation did not induce pERK in any cell line examined.


In another experiment with unPEGylated10Fn3-based binders, H292 cells were serum-starved, exposed to 1 μM unPEGylated monospecific EGFR binder E2, IGFR binder I1, or E2-GS10-I1, or vehicle control for 1 hour, then stimulated with either EGF, IGF-I, or EGF+IGF-I for 10 min. The basal levels of phosphorylated EGFR, IGFR, and AKT were nearly undetectable after serum deprivation (FIG. 25). Stimulation with EGF induced EGFR phosphorylation, but did not transactivate IGFR. EGFR phosphorylation was blocked by the E2, and E2-GS10-I1, but not IL Similarly, stimulation with IGF-I induced strong phosphorylation of IGFR that was blocked by I1 and E2-GS10-I1, but not by E2. EGF stimulation only slightly increased AKT phosphorylation, but IGF-I or EGF+IGF-I strongly induced phosphorylation of AKT that was suppressed to basal levels by both I1 and E2-GS10-I1. The combination of IGF-I and EGF induced AKT phosphorylation more than either growth factor alone. E2 partially reduced pAKT induced by the combination of EGF and IGF-I. However, I1 showed the most dramatic reduction in pAKT, suggesting that stimulation with EGF+IGF-I led to strong AKT phosphorylation through the IGFR pathway. Surprisingly, blockade of the EGFR pathway by E2 followed by stimulation with EGF ligand actually increased the phosphorylation of AKT, perhaps as a result of EGFR-independent activation of AKT ((Dobashi Y, et al. (2009) EGFR-dependent and independent activation of Akt/mTOR cascade in bone and soft tissue tumors. Mod Pathol (Epub Ahead of Print)). These results illustrate the complex cross-talk between the EGFR and IGFR pathways and feed-back mechanisms.


Example 27
Competition Binding Studies with E/I 10Fn3-Based Binders

For Biacore competition experiments, EGFR-Fc (3 μg/mL in Na-acetate pH 5.0) was immobilized on the Biacore CM5 chip surface using standard EDC/NHS amide coupling chemistry to a surface density of 300 RU. EGFR antibodies were obtained as a marketed drug and competition between monospecific EGFR binder E2 and antibodies for binding to EGFR-Fc was assessed by binding 450 nM E2 (30 μL/min, 200s contact time), immediately followed by 450 nM E2 alone, or a mixture of 450 nM E2 plus 450 nM cetuximab, panitumumab, or nimotuzumab (30 μL/min, 200 sec contact time). The surface was successfully regenerated between cycles using two 10 sec pulses of 50 mM NaOH at a flow rate of 30 μL/min. Initial injection of E2 shows binding to EGFR on the surface of the chip. A second injection of E2 mixed with an equal amount of cetuximab, panitumumab, or nimotuzumab shows no competition for binding of antibodies to EGFR by E2 (FIG. 26A).


Surface plasmon resonance (BIAcore) analysis was utilized to demonstrate simultaneous engagement of captured EGFR-Fc and solution phase IGF1R by E/I 10Fn3-based binders. Recombinant human EGFR-Fc (aa 1-645 of the extracellular domain of human EGFR fused to human Fc) was purchased from R&D systems (Minneapolis, Minn.). Recombinant IGF1R (aa 1-932 of human IGF1R propeptide, proteolytically cleaved and disulfide linked) was purchased from R&D systems (Minneapolis, Minn.). To demonstrate simultaneous engagement, anti-human IgG was immobilized on flow cells 1 and 2 of a CM5 chip following the manufacturer's recommendations (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, N.J.). EGFR-Fc (50 nM) was captured on flow cell 2 at 10 uL/min for 2 minutes. Binding of E/I 10Fn3-based binders to EGFR-Fc was achieved by injecting 10Fn3-based protein samples (100 nM) over both flow cells at 10 uL/min for 2 minutes. Simultaneous engagement of EGFR-Fc and IGF1R was probed by subsequently injecting IGF1R (0.100 nM) over both flow cells at 30 uL/min for 2 minutes. Dissociation of the complex was monitored for 300 seconds. Two 30 second injections of 3 M MgCl2 were used for regeneration of the bound complex from the anti-human IgG surface. Biacore T100 Evaluation Software, Version 2.0.1 (GE healthcare/Biacore) was utilized to overlay sensograms and remove airspikes. As shown in FIG. 26B, both domains of the E/I 10Fn3-based binder are functional and able to bind to EGFR-Fc and IGF1R simultaneously.


Binding specificity of E2-GS10-I1 pegylated to HER family receptors was assessed by Biacore as described in Example 5. HER-2-Fc, HER-3-Fc and HER-4-Fc (R&D Systems) was captured on the surface of the CM5 chip with anti-human IgG. E2-GS10-I1 pegylated did not show any discernible binding to other HER family members under conditions where robust binding was seen for EGFR-Fc (HER-1) (Table 19).









TABLE 19







Binding affinity of E2-GS10-I1 pegylated to


extracellular domains of HER family of receptors.















HER-
HER-
HER-




EGFR-
2-Fc
3-Fc
4-Fc




Fc KD,
KD,
KD,
KD,



Name
nM*
nM
nM
nM

















E2-GS10-I1pegylated
10.1
>1000
>1000
>1000










Example 28
Measurement of Plasma Biomarkers

Levels of soluble biomarkers TGFα and mIGF1 were measured in mouse plasma at the end of xenograft studies or in non tumor bearing mice at various times following treatment. Blood was obtained by terminal cardiac puncture into tubes containing EDTA as an anticoagulant. Plasma was prepared by centrifuging blood at 1300×g for 10 minutes at 4 degrees C. and removing the clarified supernatant to a separate tube. TGFα levels were measured in 0.1 ml of plasma, mIGF1 levels were measured in 0.02 ml plasma with an ELISA assay as recommended by manufacturer (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn.). Plasma levels of TGFα were increased in mice treated with I1-GS10-E5 pegylated or the monospecific EGFR binder E5 pegylated but not cetuximab (FIG. 27A-C). The TGFα could be secreted from the human tumor or may represent endogenous mouse TGFα. Due to the high homology between human and mouse TGFα (93% amino acid identity) the ELISA may cross react with mouse TGFα. Furthermore, human TGFα secreted by the implanted tumor can bind to the mouse EGFR. Because I1-GS10-E5 pegylated and E5 pegylated can bind both human and mouse EGFR, all host and tumor EGFR binding sites are blocked by these 10Fn3-based binders while cetuximab does not bind mouse EGFR. To determine if these 10Fn3-based binders cause increases in endogenouse mouse TGFα and if the ELISA cross reacts with mouse TGFα, non-tumor bearing nude mice were dosed with I1-GS10-E5 pegylated at 100 mg/kg and plasma samples were taken at 4, 24, 48, 72 hours post dose. Increases in mouse TGFα were in fact observed that persisted out past 72 hours (FIG. 28A). Plasma samples from non-tumored mice were also tested for mIGF1 with a mouse specific ELISA and increases in this ligand were also observed (FIG. 28B).


Example 29
Results of In Vivo Human Tumor Xenograft Studies for Various E/I 10Fn3-Based Binders

Several E/I 10Fn3-based binders were evaluated in a head-to-head H292 NSCLC study (methods described in Example 12) at a lower dose than previously used so that differences in relative activity could be ascertained. Efficacy of the E/I 10Fn3-based binders E2-GS10-I1 pegylated, E4-GS10-I1 pegylated, I1-GS10-E5 pegylated, I1-GS10-E85 pegylated, I1-GS10-E4 pegylated, I1-GS10-E105 pegylated at a single dose of 0.625 mg/mouse and panitumumab at two doses (1 mg/mouse and 0.1 mg/mouse) were compared.


Both doses of panitumumab and all E/I 10Fn3-based binders evaluated in this study were active by a tumor growth inhibition (TGI) endpoint. During the dosing phase, E4-GS10-I1 pegylated, I1-GS10-E5 pegylated, I1-GS10-E4 pegylated and panitumumab all caused tumor regression (Table 20, TGI values greater than 100%) while E2-GS10-I1 pegylated, I1-GS10-E85 pegylated and I1-GS10-E105 pegylated caused tumor growth inhibition (Table 20, TGI values up to 100%). Differences in activity were statistically significant when compared to the control group. All treatments were well tolerated with no treatment related deaths or excessive weight loss over the course of the study. Comparison of the efficacy of the E/I 10Fn3-based binders and panitumumab are presented in Table 20 below and in FIG. 29. In FIG. 29A, measurements out to day 43 shows the pattern of regrowth of the tumors after dosing ceased. FIG. 29B shows measurements out to day 27 and the y-axis is expanded to illustrate the relative differences in activity among the treatment groups.









TABLE 20







In vivo antitumor activity in the H292 NSCLC study
















Schedule,
Dose
AVE weight

p value for
Outcome


Group
Compound
Route
(mg/kg)
change (g)
% TGI
% TGI
by % TGI

















1
Control


3.36

1.0




(untreated)


2
panitumumab
q3dx5; 6 ipa
   1 mg/mse
5.19
107
0.0023
A


3
panitumumab
q3dx5; 6 ipa
 0.1 mg/mse
5.9
105
0.0029
A


4
E2-GS10-I1
TIWX3; 6 ipa
0.625 mg/mse
−1.4
93
0.0067
A



pegylated


5
E4-GS10-I1
TIWX3; 6 ipa
0.625 mg/mse
−0.23
105
0.0023
A



pegylated


6
I1-GS10-E5
TIWX3; 6 ipa
0.625 mg/mse
−2.92
103
0.0033
A



pegylated


7
I1-GS10-E85
TIWX3; 6 ipa
0.625 mg/mse
1.08
86
0.0114
A



pegylated


8
I1-GS10-E4
TIWX3; 6 ipa
0.625 mg/mse
−1.21
103
0.0034
A



pegylated


9
I1-GS10-E105
TIWX3; 6 ipa
0.625 mg/mse
−1.54
95
0.0035
A



pegylated






aVehicle was phosphate buffered saline.



Abbreviations used are as follows:


ip, intraperitoneal route;


% TGI, relative % tumor growth inhibition calculated as % TGI = [(Ct − Tt)/(Ct − C0)] × 100 where Ct = median tumor weight of control mice at time t in days after tumor implant, Tt = median tumor weight of treated mice at time t, C0 = median tumor weight of control mice at time 0.


% TGI value was calculated at two points as the average inhibition of Day 20, Day 24 and Day 27. Outcome, a treatment regimen was considered active if it produced a statistically significant % TGI value of >50%;


q3dx5; 6, compound was administered every three days for six doses starting on the sixth day after tumor implant; 6 on/1 off; 6, compound was administered once a day for 6 days then no treatment for 1 day and this regimen started on the sixth day after tumor implant.


p values were calculated on Day 20 relative to the control group in a two tailed paired analysis with 8 measurements per group.






Further in vivo studies were carried out with selected E/I 10Fn3-based binders below, in various xenograft models using the methods described in Example 12. A description of the various xenograft models is as follows: H292 is a non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and is described in more detail Example 12; MCF7r breast carcinoma is described in Example 14; and GEO colon carcinoma is described in Example 15. The DiFi human colon carcinoma expresses high levels of activated EGFR and also expresses IGFR; RH41 is a pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma cell line that is known to be driven predominantly by IGFR signaling (Huang F, et al. ((2009)) The mechanisms of differential sensitivity to an insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor inhibitor (BMS-536924) and rationale for combining with EGFR/HER2 inhibitors. Cancer Res. 69:161-170) and thus is not sensitive to EGFR blockade; Cal27 is a human head and neck carcinoma expressing high levels of EGFR and moderate levels of IGFR; BxPC3 is a human pancreatic carcinoma; and H441 is a NSCLC.


Comparison of the efficacy of selected E/I 10Fn3-based binders are presented in Table 21. In these efficacy studies, all of the E/I 10Fn3-based binders showed equivalent activity to panitumumab and all treatments were able to regress H292 tumors below their starting size as indicated by % TGI values over 100%. In the DiFi study, panitumumab regressed tumors at the 1 mg/mouse dose and was active at the 0.1 mg/mouse dose while all of the E/I 10Fn3-based binders were inactive although the I1-GS10-E5 pegylated showed some inhibition of tumor growth (TGI=43.8%). In the RH41 study, panitumumab was not active at either dose, the E2-pegylated construct was not active while the E/I 10Fn3-based binders and the I1-pegylated construct were all active. FIG. 32 shows antitumor efficacy in the RH41 model for a representative construct E2-GS10-I1 pegylated (data also shown in Table 22). In the Cal27 study panitumumab regressed tumors at the 1 mg/mouse dose and was active at the 0.1 mg/mouse dose but among the E/I 10Fn3-based binders only the I1-GS10-E5 pegylated E/I 10Fn3-construct was active.


Results of human tumor xenograft studies with I1-GS10-E5 pegylated and individual 11 and E5 components designed to assess synergy are presented in Table 22. These combination (synergy) studies were structured such that the individual pieces of the E/I 10Fn3-based binders (ie., IGFR and EGFR monospecific pegylated versions) were included so antitumor effects beyond the contribution of isolated ends could be discerned. In the MCF7r study, I1 pegylated was not active while the E5 pegylated, (E5 pegylated+I1 pegylated) and the I1-GS10-E5 pegylated clones were all active and exhibited similar activity meaning that all of the antitumor activity likely comes from inhibition of EGFR and blocking the IGFR pathway did not provide any enhancement. Cetuximab regressed tumors at the 1 mg/mouse dose and was not active at the 0.1 mg/mouse dose. BMS-754807 was also not active showing that blocking the IGFR pathway with a small molecule inhibitor did not result in efficacy in this model.


In the BxPC3 study, I1 pegylated was not active while the E5 pegylated and (E5 pegylated+I1 pegylated) clones were active (TGI=61.2% and 68.8%, respectively). The I1-GS10-E5 pegylated clone was more active (TGI=78%) than the individual pieces it is made from and the difference was statistically significant by a two tailed paired t-test showing that it has synergistic activity in this model. Cetuximab was active at all doses studied but adding in IGFR inhibition by combining it with the I1-pegylated did not result in synergy.


In the GEO study, I1 pegylated was not active while the E5 pegylated and (E5 pegylated+I1 pegylated) and I1-GS10-E5 pegylated clones were active (TGI=83.5%, 92.1 and 92.1%, respectively). While there may have been some enhancement provided by combining EGFR and IGFR inhibition together in this model, the difference was not significantly better than the E5 pegylated by itself. Cetuximab was active at both doses studied but adding in IGFR inhibition by combining it with the I1-pegylated did not result in synergy.


In the H441 study, I1 pegylated and E5 pegylated were not active on their own but (E5 pegylated+I1 pegylated) was active (TGI=54.5%). The I1-GS10-E5 pegylated clone was more active (TGI=69.2%) than the individual pieces it is made from but the differences were not statistically significant showing that it provides enhanced activity but not synergy in this model. Cetuximab was active at the 1 mg/mouse dose and was not active at the 0.1 mg/mouse dose. Adding in IGFR inhibition by combining it with the I1-pegylated did not result in any enhancement in this model.









TABLE 21







In vivo results of selected E/I 10Fn3-based binders

















Dose
AVE weight

p value for
Outcome


Group
Compound
Schedule
(mg/kg)a
change (g)
% TGI
% TGI
by % TGI










In vivo antitumor activity in the H292 study














1
Control (untreated)


5.7

1.0



2
panitumumab
Q3dx5; 6 ipa
1 mg/mse
5.0
104
0.0006
A


3
panitumumab
Q3dx5; 6 ipa
0.1 mg/mse  
1.5
102
0.0005
A


4
E4-GS10-I1 pegylated
TIWX3; 6
2 mg/mse
−4.86
105
0.0004
A


5
I1-GS10-E5 pegylated
TIWX3; 6
2 mg/mse
−10.0
102
0.0006
A


6
I1-GS10-E4 pegylated
TIWX3; 6
2 mg/mse
−1.41
105
0.0005
A







In vivo antitumor activity in the DiFi study














1
Control (untreated)


−0.5

1.0



2
panitumumab
Q3dx5; 6 ipa
1 mg/mse
5.3
109.7
0.006
A


3
panitumumab
Q3dx5; 6 ipa
0.1 mg/mse  
2.6
99.9
0.005
A


4
E4-GS10-I1 pegylated
TIWX3; 6
3 mg/mse
−10.8
−1.1
0.815
I


5
I1-GS10-E5 pegylated
TIWX3; 6
3 mg/mse
−16.4
43.8
0.310
I


6
I1-GS10-E4 pegylated
TIWX3; 6
3 mg/mse
−8.5
1.4
0.977
I







In vivo antitumor activity in the RH41study














1
Control (untreated)


7.2

1.0



2
panitumumab
q3dx5; 6 ipa
1 mg/mse
10.7
16.5
0.721
I


3
panitumumab
q3dx5; 6 ipa
0.1 mg/mse  
8.6
38.4
0.563
I


4
E4-GS10-I1 pegylated
TIWX3; 6
2.5 mg/mse  
−5.3
72.7
0.02
A


5
I1-GS10-E5 pegylated
TIWX3; 6
2.5 mg/mse  
−7.8
68
0.019
A


6
I1-GS10-E4 pegylated
TIWX3; 6
2.5 mg/mse  
−2.9
64.5
0.018
A


7
Control (untreated)


12.3

1.0



8
E2-GS10-I1 pegylated
TIWX3; 18
2.5 mg/mse  
−1.8
58.6
0.044
A


9
E2-pegylated
TIWX3; 18
1.25 mg/mse  
5.9
20.2
0.530
I


10
I1 pegylated
TIWX3; 18
1.25 mg/mse  
7.1
58.6
0.025
A







In vivo antitumor activity in the Cal27 study














1
Control (untreated)


9.4

1.0



2
Panitumumab
q3dx5; 6 ipa
1 mg/mse
6.1
109.8
0.0006
A


3
panitumumab
q3dx5; 6 ipa
0.1 mg/mse  
5.8
72.9
0.003
A


4
E4-GS10-I1 pegylated
TIWX3; 6
2 mg/mse
−1.2
−11.4
0.587
I


5
I1-GS10-E5 pegylated
TIWX3; 6
2 mg/mse
−11.6
57.6
0.037
A


6
I1-GS10-E4 pegylated
TIWX3; 6
2 mg/mse
−2.2
−9.2
0.177
I






aVehicle was phosphate buffered saline for all treatments.



Abbreviations used are as follows:


ip, intraperitoneal route;


po, oral route;


% TGI, relative % tumor growth inhibition calculated as % TGI = [(Ct − Tt)/(Ct − C0)] × 100 where Ct = median tumor weight of control mice at time t in days after tumor implant, Tt = median tumor weight of treated mice at time t, C0 = median tumor weight of control mice at time 0.


% TGI value was calculated at two points as the average inhibition on Day 19 and 23 for H292, Day 39 and 41 for DiFi, Day 34 and 37 for RH41 for groups 1-6 and Day 35, 36 and 39 for groups 7-10, Day 18 and 20 for Cal27. Outcome, a treatment regimen was considered active if it produced a statistically significant % TGI value of >50%;


q3dx5; 6, compound was administered every three days for six doses starting on the sixth day after tumor implant;


TIWX3; 6, compound was administered three times a week for 3 weeks and this regimen started on the sixth day after tumor implant.


p values were calculated relative to the control group in a two tailed paired analysis with 8 measurements per group on Day 23 for H292, Day 39 for DiFi, Day 37 for RH41 for groups 1-6 and Day 39 for groups 7-10 and Day 20 for Cal27.













TABLE 22







Summary of in vivo experiments with 10Fn3-based binders and comparators

















Dose
AVE weight

p value for
Outcome


Group
Compound
Schedule
(mg/kg)a
change (g)
% TGI
% TGI
by % TGI










In vivo antitumor activity in the MCF7r study














1
Control (untreated)


6.1

1.0



2
I1 pegylateda
TIWX3; 7
  50 mg/kg, ip
17.1
−40.8
0.195
I


3
E5 pegylateda
TIWX3; 7
  50 mg/kg, ip
5.1
75.8
0.007
A


4
E5 pegylateda + I1 pegylateda
TIWX3; 7
  50 mg/kg, ip
−3.0
81.8
<0.0001
A


5
I1-GS10-E5 pegylateda
TIWX3; 7
 100 mg/kg, ip
−4.5
78
0.009
A


6
cetuximaba
Q3DX5; 7
  1 mg/mse, ip
11.7
105.4
0.0009
A


7
cetuximaba
Q3DX5; 7
 0.1 mg/mse, ip
7.5
34.3
0.031
I


8
BMS-754807b
QDX14; 7
  50 mg/kg, po
−4.0
44.5
0.146
I







In vivo antitumor activity in the BxPC3 study














1
Control (untreated)


3.1

1.0



2
I1 pegylated
TIWX3; 9
  50 mg/kg, ip
4.3
14.3
0.315
I


3
E5 pegylated
TIWX3; 9
  50 mg/kg, ip
−5.3
61.2
0.0003
A


4
E5 pegylated + I1 pegylated
TIWX3; 9
  50 mg/kg, ip
−4.9
68.8
0.0019
A


5
I1-GS10-E5 pegylated
TIWX3; 9
 100 mg/kg, ip
−14.0
78.0
0.0002
A


6
cetuximab
Q3DX5; 9
  1 mg/mse, ip
5.2
62.6
0.0026
A


7
cetuximab
Q3DX5; 9
0.25 mg/mse, ip
2.5
62.8
0.0005
A


8
cetuximab +
Q3DX5; 9
  1 mg/mse, ip
3.6
62.1
0.0005
A



I1 pegylated
TIWX3; 9
  50 mg/kg, ip







In vivo antitumor activity in the GEO study














1
Control (untreated)


7.5

1.0



2
I1 pegylated
TIWX3; 9
  50 mg/kg, ip
−7.2
26.8
0.594
I


3
E5 pegylated
TIWX3; 9
  50 mg/kg, ip
9.7
83.5
0.0028
A


4
E5 pegylated + I1 pegylated
TIWX3; 9
  50 mg/kg, ip
5.4
92.1
0.0005
A


5
I1-GS10-E5 pegylated
TIWX3; 9
 100 mg/kg, ip
−7.3
92.1
0.0006
A


6
cetuximab
Q3DX5; 9
  1 mg/mse, ip
7.7
91.8
0.0008
A


7
cetuximab
Q3DX5; 9
0.25 mg/mse, ip
7.8
92.0
0.0007
A


8
cetuximab +
Q3DX5; 9
  1 mg/mse, ip
7.1
91.3
0.0006
A



I1 pegylated
TIWX3; 9
  50 mg/kg, ip







In vivo antitumor activity in the H441 study














1
Control (untreated)


12.4

1.0



2
I1 pegylated
TIWX3; 9
  50 mg/kg, ip
11.5
30.8
0.701
I


3
E5 pegylated
TIWX3; 9
  50 mg/kg, ip
−8.8
43.1
0.292
I


4
E5 pegyalted + I1 pegylated
TIWX3; 9
  50 mg/kg, ip
−0.8
54.5
0.011
A


5
I1-GS10-E5 pegylated
TIWX3; 9
 100 mg/kg, ip
−3.9
69.2
0.022
A


6
cetuximab
Q3DX5; 9
  1 mg/mse, ip
12.6
65.2
0.002
A


7
cetuximab
Q3DX5; 9
0.25 mg/mse, ip
13.7
43.9
0.110
I


8
cetuximab +
Q3DX5; 9
  1 mg/mse, ip
10.2
66.7
0.060
I



I1 pegylated
TIWX3; 9
  50 mg/kg, ip






aVehicle was phosphate buffered saline for all treatments.



Abbreviations used are as follows:


ip, intraperitoneal route;


po, oral route;


% TGI, relative % tumor growth inhibition calculated as % TGI = [(Ct − Tt)/(Ct − C0)] × 100 where Ct = median tumor weight of control mice at time t in days after tumor implant, Tt = median tumor weight of treated mice at time t, C0 = median tumor weight of control mice at time 0.


% TGI value was calculated at two points as the average inhibition on Day 22 and 26 for MCF7r, Day 23 and 27 for BxPC3, Day 29 and 31 for GEO and Day 17 and for H441. Outcome, a treatment regimen was considered active if it produced a statistically significant % TGI value of >50%;


q3dx5; 6, compound was administered every three days for six doses starting on the sixth day after tumor implant;


TIWX3; 6, compound was administered three times a week for 3 weeks and this regimen started on the sixth day after tumor implant.


p values were calculated relative to the control group in a two tailed paired analysis with 8 measurements per group on Day 26 for MCF7r, Day 27 for BxPC3, Day 29 for GEO and Day17 for H441.






Example 30
Pharmacokinetic Profile of Various E/I 10Fn3-Based Binders in Mice

The pharmacokinetic profiles of the pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binder, E2-GS10-I1, were assessed in mice via intraperitoneal injection. Three nude mice per dose group were dosed with E2-GS10-I1, formulated in PBS, at 10 and 100 mg/kg, ip and plasma samples were collected in citrate phosphate dextrose solution at pre dosing, 0.5, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, and 168 hours post dosing. Plasma samples were assessed for pegylated E2-GS10-I1 Fn3-based binder levels using a quantitative electrochemiluminescence (ECL) assay developed to detect and quantitate the pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binder in plasma samples. In this assay, a mouse monoclonal antibody with specificity toward the EGFR binding region was adsorbed to Meso Scale Discovery plates overnight at 4° C. to allow capture of the pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binder in the plasma samples. The plasma samples were added to the plates and incubated at 22° C. for 1 h. The captured pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binder was detected by a rabbit polyclonal antibody specific to the scaffold region of the E/I 10Fn3-based binder, mixed with a goat anti-rabbit antibody linked with a SULFO-TAG. Following a wash to remove unbound SULFO-TAG reagent, a read buffer was added and ECL detection was used. The level of pegylated E2-GS10-I1 in plasma samples was calculated based on comparison to a 4-parameter fit of a standard curve of the pegylated E2-GS10-I1 Fn3-based binder.


Mice administered 10 or 100 mg/kg interperitoneally (ip) of pegylated E2-GS10-I1 resulted in peak levels of approximately 200 and 1700 μg/mL, respectively, indicating dose-proportional pharmacokinetics (FIG. 30). Pharmacokinetic parameters for FIG. 30 were calculated in a similar fashion to those described in the paragraph below (note that “T ½” is interchangeable with “HL_lambda_z” and AUC is interchangeable with “AUCINF_obs”. The half-life of pegylated E2-GS10-I1 in mice was 15.75±1.52 h (FIG. 30). Based on these pharmacokinetic parameters, administration of 100 mg/kg three times weekly (TIW) in human tumor xenograft studies was able to maintain drug levels 10- to 100-fold higher than the in vitro IC50 value.


Additional pharmacokinetic experiments were conducted on several pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders, where mice were administered 10 or 100 mg/kg interperitoneally (ip) and, for the pegylated I1-GS10-E5, 10 or 64 mg/kg sub-cutaneously (sc), plasma was collected and analyzed as described above to measure the levels of pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders. The pharmacokinetic parameters of these various E/I 10Fn3-based binders were obtained by non-compartmental analysis of plasma (serum) concentration vs. time data. WinNonlin software (version 5.1, Pharsight Corp. Mountain View Calif.) was used to calculate the terminal half-life (HL_lambda_z), maximum observed concentration (Cmax), the area under the curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUCINF_obs), clearance (CL_F_obs), volume of distribution based on the terminal phase (Vz_F_obs) and the mean residence time extrapolated to infinity (MRTINF_obs). Results showed that the half life for the pegylated E/I 10Fn3-based binders were between 12.1-20.9 hours, as shown in FIG. 44 and FIG. 31.


Example 31
Pharmacodynamics

Samples were taken from the H292 and the DiFi xenograft models described in Table 21 at the end of the study and processed as outlined under Measurement of pharmacodynamic endpoints in tumors in Example 12 for analysis of total levels of EGFR and IGFR protein and phosphorylated EGFR and IGFR. Target effects of I1-GS10-E5-pegylated and panitumumab were evaluated by immunoblotting as described in Example 11. In FIG. 33A, levels of total EGFR, pEGFR and total IGFR were lower in I1-GS10-E5-pegylated treated tumors than in untreated tumors at the end of the DiFi xenograft model. In FIG. 33B, levels of pEGFR were lower in tumors treated with panitumumab and I1-GS10-E5-pegylated. Levels of total EGFR were lower only in I1-GS10-E5-pegylated treated tumors but not in panitumumab treated tumors. Levels of total IGFR were lower in both I1-GS10-E5-pegylated treated tumors and in one panitumumab treated tumor but not the other. The amount of pIGFR in these models was too low to detect differences following treatment. Immunoblots were probed with GAPDH to demonstrate equal loading of protein.


Example 32
EGFR 10Fn3-Based Binders Optimization and Consensus Sequence Analysis

The 10Fn3-based binder 679F09 (as described in PCT WO 2009/102421) (FIG. 34) was identified as a binder to EGFR ectodomain-Fc fusion protein (R&D Systems). Binding activity was selected using a bead coated with EGFR-Fc and 10Fn3-based binders coupled to their nucleic acid coding sequence (see e.g., Xu et al., Directed Evolution of High-Affinity Antibody Mimics Using mRNA Display, Chem. Biol. 9: 933-942 (2002)). More potent variants of the parental EGFR binder 679F09 having alterations to the amino acid sequences in the BC, DE and FG loops were also identified.


Sequence Analysis I: All 10Fn3-Based Binders Selected for High-Affinity Binding to EGFR


In order to reveal sequence patterns that defined strong affinity for EGFR, all unique EGFR binding sequences (1044) were analyzed using several methods. First, the sequences were analyzed by the frequency of amino acids at each position in the loops (FIGS. 35-38). Only unique sequences for each loop were analyzed.


From the above sequence analysis, the following broad sequence motif was defined:


Sequence Motif #1

    • (a) BC loop: “YQ” in positions 7-8 (i.e., corresponding to positions 29 and 30 of SEQ ID NO: 1)
    • (b) DE loop: aliphatic residue (“V/I/L/M/A”) in position 3 (i.e., corresponding to position 54 of SEQ ID NO: 1)
    • (c) FG loop: “D/N” in position 1 (i.e., corresponding to position 77 of SEQ ID NO: 1)


All 1044 sequences analyzed, except one, follow the FG loop sequence pattern (c). Of all unique sequences analyzed, 90% follow pattern (a) for the BC loop, and 95% follow pattern (b) for the DE loop. All sequences analyzed, except four, follow at least two of the three patterns above. In addition, the 15-amino acid FG loop length is a noteworthy sequence feature.


In addition to the broad Sequence Motif #1 defined above, the data in FIGS. 35-38 were used to define a second sequence motif based on the dominant residues at each position. Residues were included in this motif if the sum of the top 3 most frequent amino acids had a greater than 50% frequency.


Sequence Motif #2

    • (a) BC loop: XXXXXXYQ (same as Motif #1), wherein X is any amino acid
    • (b) DE loop: (G/Y/H)(D/M/G)(V/L/I)X, wherein X is any amino acid
    • (c) FG loop, 10 amino acid length: (D/N)(Y/M)(Y/A/M)(Y/H/F)(K/Q/V)(E/P/R)(Y/T/K)X(E/Y/Q)(Y/G/H), wherein X is any amino acid
    • (d) FG loop, 15 amino acid length: D(Y/F/W)(Y/F/K)(N/D/P)(P/H/L)(A/T/V)(T/D/S)(H/Y/G)(E/P/V)(Y/H)(T/K/I)(Y/F)(H/N/Q)(T/Q/E)(T/S/I)


The analysis methods used to define Sequence Motifs #1 and #2 evaluate each residue position within a loop separately. To reveal any sequence motifs spanning multiple residues within a loop, the 10Fn3-based binders were subjected to further analysis. In this analysis, the loop sequences were aligned using ClustalW (Thompson J D et al. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673-4680, 1994). From this alignment, families of sequences were grouped using manual inspection. For the BC and DE loops, sequence patterns similar to Sequence Motifs #1 and #2 were observed. However, additional sequence motifs could be defined for the 10 and 15 amino acid long FG loops.


Sequence Motif #3

    • (a) FG loop, 10 amino acid length
      • (1) DY(A/Y)GKPYXEY (SEQ ID NO: 473), wherein X is any amino acid
      • (2) DY(A/Y)Y(K/R/Q/T)PYXEY (SEQ ID NO: 474), wherein X is any amino acid
      • (3) (D/N)Y(A/Y)(Y/F)(K/R/Q/T)EYXE(Y/H) (SEQ ID NO: 475), wherein X is any amino acid
      • (4) DYY(H/Y)X(R/K)X(E/T)YX (SEQ ID NO: 476), wherein X is any amino acid
      • (5) DYY(H/Y)(K/H/Q)(R/K)T(E/T)Y(G/P) (SEQ ID NO: 477)
      • (6) (D/N)MMHV(E/D)YXEY (SEQ ID NO: 478), wherein X is any amino acid
      • (7) DYMHXXYXEY (SEQ ID NO: 479) (like FG loop of 679F09), wherein X is any amino acid
      • (8) D(M/Y)YHX(K/R)X(V/I/L/M)YG (SEQ ID NO: 480), wherein X is any amino acid
    • (b) FG loop, 15 amino acid length
      • (1) D(Y/F)(Y/F)NPXTHEYXYXXX (SEQ ID NO: 481), wherein X is any amino acid
      • (2) D(Y/F)(Y/F)D(P/L)X(T/S)HXYXYXXX (SEQ ID NO: 482), wherein X is any amino acid
      • (3) D(Y/F)(K/R)PHXDGPH(T/I)YXE(S/Y) (SEQ ID NO: 483), wherein X is any amino acid


Sequence Analysis II: 10Fn3-Based Binders Showing More Potent Inhibition of EGFR Phosphorylation


Another overall sequence analysis was performed on the subset of 10Fn3-based binders that showed the most potent activity in a cell-based assay (as opposed to Sequence Analysis I, which was performed on all binders selected for high-affinity binding to EGFR through Profusion). Because many of the binders were only run through single-point cell-based assays, binders that showed greater than 75% inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation at a fixed concentration of 100 nM were included in this analysis. The percent inhibition at a given concentration is related to the IC50 by: % inhibition=100× concentration/(concentration+IC50).


Normally, an IC50 is calculated by fitting the data for % inhibition at various concentrations. However, given that only a single data point is available for each binder, it is inappropriate to use this single data point to calculate an IC50. Therefore, the percent inhibition of EGFR signaling at a single concentration point was used as an approximation of the potency of the binder. Although a binder may show 75% inhibition at a concentration of 100 nM, increasing the concentration will allow the clone to show 100% inhibition at a higher concentration. The % inhibition is inversely related to the IC50; i.e., the higher the % inhibition, the lower the IC50 and the more potent the binder. If a binder showed 75% inhibition at a concentration of 100 nM, we considered this to be a “potent” binder for the purposes of Sequence Analysis II. However, the binders which showed less than 75% inhibition at 100 nM concentration for the most part still bind to EGFR and still have an effect on EGFR signaling. For instance, the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody Nimotuzumab (Friedlander E et al. ErbB-directed immunotherapy: antibodies in current practice and promising new agents. Immunol Lett 116: 126-140, 2008) is currently under development as a therapeutic, but it shows <5% inhibition at a 100 nM concentration in the EGFR phosphorylation assay (data not shown). The sequences of all “potent” binders assayed and their % inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation at 100 nM concentration is shown in FIG. 45.


The total number of unique 10Fn3-based binders that showed >75% inhibition at 100 nM concentration was 111. As before, the sequences first were analyzed by the frequency of amino acids at each position in the loops (FIGS. 39-42). Since these binders are a subset of all the binders selected for high affinity binding to EGFR during Profusion, they also follow Sequence Motif #1 (see above). All “potent” sequences analyzed follow the FG loop sequence pattern (“D/N” in position 1). Of all unique “potent” sequences analyzed, 93% follow the pattern for the BC loop (“YQ” in positions 7-8), and 98% follow the pattern for the DE loop (aliphatic residue (“V/I/L/M/A”) in position 3). All “potent” sequences analyzed follow at least two of the three patterns of Sequence Motif #1.


Of note, the 15-amino acid FG loop length also appears to be highly represented in the most “potent” binders. While 15-amino acid long FG loops represent only 55% of all binders selected for high affinity binding to EGFR (Sequence Analysis I), 15-amino acid FG loops represent 86% of the binders with >50% inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation at 100 nM concentration, and 91% of the binders with >75% inhibition (“potent” binders in Sequence Analysis II). Therefore, the longer 15-amino acid FG loop appears to be a sequence pattern associated with greater potency.


Of the 111 “potent” sequences analyzed, only 10 contain 10-amino acid long FG loops, and 6 of those are unique. Therefore, a single sequence motif can encompass every “potent” 10-amino acid FG loop sequence. Sequence Motif #4 was defined based on these 6 sequences.


Sequence Motif #4

    • FG loop, 10-amino acid length, “potent” binders
    • (D/N)(M/Y)(M/A/W)(H/F/Y)(V/K)EY(A/Q/R/S/T)E(Y/H/D)


The sequence analysis of the “potent” binders with 15-amino acid FG loops also further illuminated which residue positions were most conserved, allowing Sequence Motif #5 to be defined. An “X” in this sequence motif denotes positions where there are no three dominant amino acids.


Sequence Motif #5

    • FG loop, 15-amino acid length, “potent” binders
    • D(Y/F/W)(Y/F/K)(N/P/D)(P/H/L)X(T/D/S)(H/G/Y)(E/P/Y)(Y/H)XYXXX, wherein X is any amino acid


All of the EGFR binders that were analyzed are progeny of the parent 679F09 and constitute a sequence “family,” i.e. they are all related in sequence according to the aforementioned sequence motifs. Various members of the 679F09 family of binders can tolerate a T51I scaffold mutation and retain binding activity. Therefore, a T511 scaffold mutation could be combined with any of the aforementioned sequence motifs to also yield a binder with high affinity binding to EGFR.


Finally, it should be noted that amino acids with similar properties can often be substituted into protein sequences with little or no effect on structure or function. This indeed is the case for 10Fn3-based binders as well, where conservative amino acid substitutions in either the loop or scaffold regions can still lead to binders which bind to EGFR. For instance, substituting “Y” for “H” in the second position of the FG loop of binder E98 yields binder E99, and both binders show similar potency in inhibiting EGFR phosphorylation (FIG. 45).

Claims
  • 1. An antibody-like protein comprising a tenth fibronectin type III domain (10Fn3) that binds epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with a KD of less than 500 nM, wherein the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 21-30 of SEQ ID NO: 112, a DE loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 51-56 of SEQ ID NO: 112, and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence set forth in amino acids 76-92 of SEQ ID NO: 112.
  • 2. The antibody-like protein of claim 1, further comprising a second tenth fibronectin type III domain (10Fn3).
  • 3. The antibody-like protein of claim 2, wherein the second 10Fn3 is covalently linked to the EGFR binding 10Fn3 via a polypeptide linker or a polyethylene glycol moiety.
  • 4. A pharmaceutically acceptable composition comprising the antibody-like protein of claim 1, wherein the composition is essentially pyrogen free.
  • 5. The antibody-like protein of claim 1, comprising an amino acid sequence at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 112.
  • 6. The antibody-like protein of claim 5, comprising an amino acid sequence at least 95% identical to SEQ ID NO: 112.
  • 7. The antibody-like protein of claim 6, comprising an amino acid sequence at least 98% identical to SEQ ID NO: 112.
  • 8. An antibody-like protein comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 112.
  • 9. An antibody-like protein comprising a tenth fibronectin type III domain (10Fn3) that binds epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with a KD of less than 500 nM, wherein the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence XgWAPVDRYQXh (SEQ ID NO: 137), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence XiRDVYXJ (SEQ ID NO: 138), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence XkDYKPHADGPHTYHESXl(SEQ ID NO: 139); and wherein X is any amino acid and g, h, i, j, k, and l are integers independently selected from 0 to 5.
  • 10. The antibody-like protein of claim 9, wherein the EGFR binding 10Fn3 comprises a BC loop having the amino acid sequence SWWAPVDRYQ (SEQ ID NO: 115), a DE loop having the amino acid sequence PRDVYT (SEQ ID NO: 116), and an FG loop having the amino acid sequence TDYKPHADGPHTYHESP (SEQ ID NO: 117).
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/625,217, filed Nov. 24, 2009, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/200,164, filed Nov. 24, 2008; 61/200,282, filed Nov. 26, 2008; 61/212,966, filed Apr. 17, 2009; 61/178,279, filed May 14, 2009; and 61/227,330, filed Jul. 21, 2009, which applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (109)
Number Name Date Kind
3773919 Boswell et al. Nov 1973 A
4863457 Lee Sep 1989 A
4997652 Wong Mar 1991 A
5164188 Wong Nov 1992 A
5235041 Cappello et al. Aug 1993 A
5443505 Wong et al. Aug 1995 A
5501856 Ohtori et al. Mar 1996 A
5514581 Ferrari et al. May 1996 A
5516522 Peyman et al. May 1996 A
5545620 Wahl et al. Aug 1996 A
5641648 Ferrari et al. Jun 1997 A
5766242 Wong et al. Jun 1998 A
5770697 Ferrari et al. Jun 1998 A
5792742 Gold et al. Aug 1998 A
5824072 Wong Oct 1998 A
5869079 Wong et al. Feb 1999 A
5922676 Pasqualini et al. Jul 1999 A
6018030 Ferrari et al. Jan 2000 A
6207446 Szostak et al. Mar 2001 B1
6214553 Szostak et al. Apr 2001 B1
6258558 Szostak et al. Jul 2001 B1
6261804 Szostak et al. Jul 2001 B1
6281344 Szostak et al. Aug 2001 B1
6316412 Ginsberg et al. Nov 2001 B1
6342219 Thorpe et al. Jan 2002 B1
6348333 Niwa et al. Feb 2002 B1
6369116 Wong et al. Apr 2002 B1
6383775 Duff et al. May 2002 B1
6462189 Koide Oct 2002 B1
6518018 Szostak et al. Feb 2003 B1
6524583 Thorpe et al. Feb 2003 B1
6559126 Tournaire et al. May 2003 B2
6660492 Bode et al. Dec 2003 B1
6699493 Wong Mar 2004 B2
6818418 Lipovsek et al. Nov 2004 B1
7053701 Vice May 2006 B2
7115396 Lipovsek et al. Oct 2006 B2
7556925 Koide et al. Jul 2009 B2
7598352 Koide Oct 2009 B2
7847062 Chen et al. Dec 2010 B2
7858739 Chen et al. Dec 2010 B2
7858759 Brandt et al. Dec 2010 B2
8067201 Morin et al. Nov 2011 B2
8221765 Camphausen et al. Jul 2012 B2
8258265 Koide Sep 2012 B2
8263741 Koide Sep 2012 B2
8278419 Jacobs et al. Oct 2012 B2
8293482 Jacobs et al. Oct 2012 B2
8420098 Camphausen et al. Apr 2013 B2
8470332 Camphausen et al. Jun 2013 B2
8524244 Camphausen et al. Sep 2013 B2
20020019517 Koide Feb 2002 A1
20020061307 Whitlow et al. May 2002 A1
20020142048 Sands et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030045681 Neri et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030104520 Ellington et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030170753 Koide Sep 2003 A1
20030186385 Koide Oct 2003 A1
20050244469 Whitcup et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050255548 Lipovsek et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050281861 Hughes et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060122162 Cutler Jun 2006 A1
20060182783 Hughes et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060210604 Dadey et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060246059 Lipovsek et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060246549 Kurz et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070059336 Hughes et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070071575 Rudduck et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070071675 Wu et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070072933 Peyman Mar 2007 A1
20070082365 Lipovsek et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070088014 Edelman et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070099879 Sheibani et al. May 2007 A1
20070160533 Chen et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070203089 Rodrigues et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080015339 Lipovsek et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080063651 Lipovsek et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080108798 Lipovsek et al. May 2008 A1
20080139791 Lipovsek et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080193445 Goetsch et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080220049 Chen et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080268051 Hughes et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090176654 Cappuccilli et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090299040 Camphausen et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100121033 Camphausen et al. May 2010 A1
20100144599 Mendlein et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100144601 Jacobs et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100152063 Cappuccilli et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100210511 Carvajal Aug 2010 A1
20100273216 Morin et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100285000 Mamluk Nov 2010 A1
20100298541 Wu et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100310549 Chen et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100322930 Kolbinger et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110021746 Cappuccilli et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110034384 Carvajal Feb 2011 A1
20110038866 Hastewell et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110123545 Marsh et al. May 2011 A1
20110124527 Cappuccilli et al. May 2011 A1
20110274623 Jacobs Nov 2011 A1
20110275535 Loew Nov 2011 A1
20120208704 Loew et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120270797 Wittrup et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130079243 Diem et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130079280 Baca et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130096019 Jacobs et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130096058 Baca et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130237684 Koide Sep 2013 A1
20130267676 Koide Oct 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (88)
Number Date Country
2293632 Dec 1998 CA
19646372 Jun 1997 DE
0430539 Jun 1991 EP
0488401 Jun 1992 EP
0654256 May 1995 EP
0962527 Dec 1999 EP
0985039 Mar 2000 EP
1137941 Oct 2001 EP
1266025 Dec 2002 EP
1477561 Nov 2004 EP
2141243 Jan 2010 EP
2379718 Oct 2011 EP
2385067 Nov 2011 EP
2439212 Apr 2012 EP
4-108827 Apr 1992 JP
2001-500531 Jan 2001 JP
9202536 Feb 1992 WO
9303172 Feb 1993 WO
9511922 May 1995 WO
9513765 May 1995 WO
9622391 Jul 1996 WO
9812226 Mar 1998 WO
9831700 Jul 1998 WO
9856915 Dec 1998 WO
9951773 Oct 1999 WO
0034784 Jun 2000 WO
0034787 Jun 2000 WO
0107657 Feb 2001 WO
0164942 Sep 2001 WO
0204523 Jan 2002 WO
0232925 Apr 2002 WO
02081497 Oct 2002 WO
02088171 Nov 2002 WO
03022858 Mar 2003 WO
03072082 Sep 2003 WO
03075840 Sep 2003 WO
03104418 Dec 2003 WO
2005056764 Jun 2005 WO
2006020258 Feb 2006 WO
2006091209 Aug 2006 WO
2007012614 Feb 2007 WO
2007044688 Apr 2007 WO
2007054120 May 2007 WO
2007062188 May 2007 WO
2007092537 Aug 2007 WO
2007096076 Aug 2007 WO
2007121894 Nov 2007 WO
2008019290 Feb 2008 WO
2008031098 Mar 2008 WO
2008048970 Apr 2008 WO
2008066752 Jun 2008 WO
2008097497 Aug 2008 WO
2008108986 Sep 2008 WO
2008153745 Dec 2008 WO
2009023184 Feb 2009 WO
2009025806 Feb 2009 WO
2009058379 May 2009 WO
2009073115 Jun 2009 WO
2009083804 Jul 2009 WO
2009086116 Jul 2009 WO
2009102421 Aug 2009 WO
2009133208 Nov 2009 WO
2009142773 Nov 2009 WO
2010051274 May 2010 WO
2010051310 May 2010 WO
2010060095 May 2010 WO
2010069913 Jun 2010 WO
2010093627 Aug 2010 WO
2010093771 Aug 2010 WO
2011020033 Feb 2011 WO
2011035202 Mar 2011 WO
2011051333 May 2011 WO
2011051466 May 2011 WO
2011092233 Aug 2011 WO
2011100700 Aug 2011 WO
2011103105 Aug 2011 WO
2011130324 Oct 2011 WO
2011130328 Oct 2011 WO
2011130354 Oct 2011 WO
2011137319 Nov 2011 WO
2011140086 Nov 2011 WO
2011150133 Dec 2011 WO
2012016245 Feb 2012 WO
2012088006 Jun 2012 WO
2012142515 Oct 2012 WO
2012158678 Nov 2012 WO
2012158739 Nov 2012 WO
2013049275 Apr 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (184)
Entry
Bork, Peer et al., “Go hunting in sequence databases but watch out for the traps,” TIG, vol. 12(10):425-427 (1996).
Bork, Peer, “Powers and Pitfalls in Sequence Analysis: The 70% Hurdle,” Genome Research, vol. 10:398-400 (2000).
Brenner, Steven E., “Errors in genome annotation,” TIG, vol. 15(4):132-133 (1999).
Brown, McKay et al., “Tolerance to Single, but Not Multiple, Amino Acid Replacements in Antibody VH CDR2,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 156:3285-3291 (1996).
Caliceti, Paolo et al., “Pharmacokinetic and biodistribution properties of poly(ethylene glycol)-protein conjugates,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 55:1261-1277 (2003).
Choy, E.H.S. Efficacy of a novel PEGylated humanized anti-TNF fragment (CDP870) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a phase II double-blinded, randomized, dose-escalating trial, Rheumatology, vol. 41:1133-1137 (2002).
Connelly, Roberta J. et al., “Mitogenic properties of a bispecific single-chain Fv-lg fusion generated from CD2-specific mAb to distinct epitopes,” International Immunology, vol. 10(12):1863-1872 (1998).
Doerks, Tobias et al., “Protein annotation: detective work for function prediction,” TIG, vol. 14(6):248-250 (1998).
Emanuel, Stuart L. et al., “A fibronectin scaffold approach to bispecific inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor and insulin-like growth factor-I receptor,” mAbs, vol. 3(1):38-48 (2011).
Emanuel, Stuart L. et al., “Functional activity of a bispecific Adnectin inhibitor to EGFR and IGFR,” 2009 AACR Annual Meeting, Session Title: IGF-IR and P13K Pathways, Abstract No. 2813, 2 pages (2009).
GenBank Accession No. AAC48614, MacLeod, J.N. et al., “Fibronectin mRNA splice variant in articular cartilage lacks bases encoding the V, III-15, and I-10 protein segments,” J. Biol. Chem., vol. 271(31):18954-18960 (1996), 2 pages (1996).
GenBank Accession No. CAA26536, Kornblihtt, A.R. et al., “Primary structure of human fibronectin: differential splicing may generate at least 10 polypeptides from a single gene,” EMBO J., vol. 4(7):1755-1759 (1985), 7 pages (1996).
GenBank Accession No. P07589, Skorstengaard, K. et al., “Complete primary structure of bovine plasma fibronectin,” Eur. J. Biochem., vol. 161(2):441-453 (1986), 9 pages (1997).
GenBank Accession No. X02761, Kornblihtt, A.R. et al., “Primary structure of human fibronectin: differential splicing may generate at least 10 polypeptides from a single gene,” EMBO J., vol. 4(7):1755-1759 (1985), 4 pages (1996).
Giusti, Angela M. et al., “Somatic diversification of S107 from an antiphosphocholine to an anti-DNA autoantibody is due to a single base change in its heavy chain variable region,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 84:2926-2930 (1987).
Huang, Fei et al., “The Mechanisms of Differential Sensitivity to an Insulin-like Growth FActor-1 Receptor Inhibitor (BMS-536924) and Rationale for Combining with EGFR/HER2 Inhibitors,” Cancer Res., vol. 69(1):161-170 (2009).
King, Catherine A. et al., “DNA vaccines with single-chain Fv fused to fragment C of tetanus toxin induce protective immunity against lymphoma and myeloma,” Nature Medicine, vol. 4(11):1281-1286 (1998).
Koide, Akiko et al., “The Fibronectin Type III Domain as a Scaffold for Novel Binding Proteins,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 284:1141-1151 (1998).
Kussie, Paul H. et al., “A Single Engineered Amino Acid Substitution Changes Antibody Fine Specificity,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 152:146-152 (1994).
Leahy, Daniel J. et al., “2.0 A Crystal Structure of a Four-Domain Segment of Human Fibronectin Encompassing the RGD Loop and Synergy Region,” Cell, vol. 84:155-164 (1996).
Lipovsek, D., “Adnectins: engineered target-binding protein therapeutics,” Protein Engineering, Design & Selection, vol. 24(1-2):3-9 (2011).
Liu, Zhihong et al., “Fine mapping of the antigen-antibody interaction of scFv215, a recombinant antibody inhibiting RNA polymerase II from Drosophila melanogaster,” Journal of Molecular Recognition, vol. 12:103-111 (1999).
Lu, Dan et al., “Simultaneous Blockade of Both the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and the Insulin-like Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Pathways in Cancer Cells with a Fully Human Recombinant Bispecific Antibody,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279(4):2856-2865 (2004).
Mao, Yong et al., “Fibronectin fibrillogenesis, a cell-mediated matrix assembly process,” Matrix Biology, vol. 24:389-399 (2005).
Ngo, J. Thomas et al., “Computational Complexity, Protein Structure Prediction, and the Levinthal Paradox,” The Protein Folding Problem and TErtiary Structure Prediction, Merz, K. (Ed.), Birkhauser, Boston, Chapter 14, pp. 491-495 (1994).
Parker, M.H. et al., “Antibody mimics based on human fibronectin type three domain engineered for thermostability and high-affinity binding to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor two,” Protein Engineering, Design & Selection, vol. 18(9):435-444 (2005).
Rudikoff, Stuart et al., “Single amino acid substitution altering antigen-binding specificity,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 79:1979-1983 (1982).
Schildbach, Joel F. et al., “Contribution of a single heavy chain residue to specificity of an anti-digoxin monoclonal antibody,” Protein Science, vol. 3:737-749 (1994).
Schildbach, Joel F. et al., “Heavy Chain Position 50 Is a Determination of Affinity and Specificity for the Anti-digoxin Antibody 26-10,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 268(29):21739-21747 (1993).
Skolnick, Jeffrey et al., “From genes to protein structure and function: novel application of computational approaches in the genomic era,” Tibtech, vol. 18:34-39 (2000).
Smith, Temple et al., “The challenges of genome sequence annotation or ‘The devil is in the details,’” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 15:1222-1223 (1997).
Vuento, Matti et al., “Purification of Fibronectin from Human Plasma by Affinity Chromatography under Non-Denaturing Conditions,” Biochem. J., vol. 183:331-337 (1979).
Wells, James A., “Additivity of Mutational Effects in Proteins,” Biochemistry, vol. 29(37):8509-8517 (1990).
Xiang, Jim et al., “Study of B72.3 combining sites by molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis,” Protein Engineering, vo. 13(5):339-344 (2000).
Xu, Lihui et al., “Directed Evolution of High-Affinity Antibody Mimics Using mRNA Display,” Chemistry & Biology, vol. 9:933-942 (2002).
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/065765, 12 pages, dated May 24, 2011.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2009/065765, 7 pages, dated Apr. 23, 2010.
Koide, Akiko et al., “Monobodies. Antibody Mimics Based on the Scaffold of the Fibronectin Type III Domain,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 352: Protein Engineering Protocols, K.M. Arndt (Ed.), Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, Chapter 6, pp. 95-109 (2007).
Lipovsek, Dasa et al., “Evolution of an Interloop Disulfide Bond in High-Affinity Antibody Mimics Based on Fibronectin Type III Domain and Selected by Yeast Surface Display: Molecular Convergence with Single-Domain Camelid and Shark Antibodies,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 368:1024-1041 (2007).
Matsushima, Ayako et al., “Modification of E. Coli Asparaginase with 2A-Bis(O-Methoxypolyethylene Glycol)-6-Chloro-S-Triazine(Activated PEG2); Disapperance of Binding Ability Towards Anti-serum and Retention of Enzymic Activity,” Chemistry Letters, pp. 773-776 (1980).
Shibuya, Masabumi, “Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2: Its unique signaling and specific ligand, VEGF-E,” Cancer Sci., vol. 94(9):751-756 (2003).
Duan, Jinzhu, et al., “Fibronectin Type III Domain Based Monobody with High Affinity,” Biochemistry, vol. 46:12656-12664 (2007).
Emanuel, Stuart L. et al., “Adnectins as a platform for multi-specific targeted biologics: A novel bispecific inhibitor of EGFR and IGF-IR growth factor receptors,” Cancer Research, vol. 70(8 Suppl. 1), Abstract 2586, 1 page, AACR 101st Annual Meeting (2010).
GenGank Accession No. ABB78921, Lipovsek, D. et al., “New non-antibody proteins having an immunoglobulin fold, useful in research, therapeutic or diagnostic fields, particularly as scaffolds for designing proteins with specific properties, e.g. for binding any antigen of interest,” 33 pages (2005).
Smith, George P. et al., “Phage Display,” Chem. Rev., vol. 97:391-410 (1997).
Takahashi, Satoru, “Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), VEGF Receptors and Their Inhibitors for Antiangiogenic Tumor Therapy,” Biol. Pharm. Bull. vol. 34(12):1785-1788 (2011).
Tang, Lisa et al., “Pharmacokinetic Aspects of Biotechnology Products,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 93 (9):2184-2204 (2004).
Tischer, Edmund et al., “The Human Gene for Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 266(18):11947-11954 (1991).
Tokuriki, Nobuhiko et al., “Stability effects of mutations and protein evolvability,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 19:596-604 (2009).
Tramontano, Anna et al., “The Making of the Minibody: an Engineered beta-Protein for the Display of Conformationally Constrained Peptides,” Journal of Molecular Recognition, vol. 7:9-24 (1994).
Trinh, Ryan et al., “Optimization of codon pair use within the (GGGGS)3 linker sequence results in enhanced protein expression,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 40:717-722 (2004).
Verheul, H.M.W. et al., “Targeting Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Blockade: Ascites and Pleural Effusion Formation,” The Oncologist, vol. 5(Suppl. 1):45-50 (2000).
Wang, Cheng-I et al., “Isolation of a High Affinity Inhibitor of Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator by Phage Display of Ecotin,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270(20):12250-12256 (1995).
Watanabe, H. et al., “Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (Flk-1/KDR) antibody suppresses contact hypersensitivity,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 13:671-681 (2004).
Watanabe, Takeshi et al., “Gene Cloning of Chitinase A1 from Bacillus circulans WL-12 Revealed Its Evolutionary Relationship to Serratia Chitinase and to the Type III Homology Units of Fibronectin,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 265:15659-15665 (1990).
Williams, Michael J. et al., “Solution Structures of Modular Proteins by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 245:451-469 (1994).
Williams, Alan F. et al., “The Immunoglobulin Superfamily—Domains for Cell Surface Recognition,” Ann. Rev. Immunol., vol. 6:381-405 (1988).
Wilson, David S. et al., “The use of mRNA display to select high-affinity protein-binding peptides,” PNAS, vol. 98 (7):3750-3755 (2001).
Yang, Karen et al., “Tailoring structure-function and pharmacokinetic properties of single-chain Fv proteins by site-specific PEGylation,” Protein Engineering, vol. 16(10):761-770 (2003).
Yoshiji, H. et al., “Vascular endothelial growth factor and receptor interaction is a prerequisite for murine hepatic fibrogenesis,” Gut, vol. 52:1347-1354 (2003).
Zdanov, Alexander et al., Structure of a single-chain antibody variable domain (Fv) fragment complexed with a carbohydrate antigen at 1.7-A resolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 91:6423-6427 (1994).
Zhou, Tianhong et al., “Development of a multi-drug delivery implant for intraocular management of proliferative vitreoretinopathy,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 55:281-295 (1998).
Zhu, Z. et al., “Inhibition of human leukemia in an animal model with human antibodies directed against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. Correlation between antibody affinity and biological activity,” Leukemia, vol. 17:604-611 (2003).
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. 01913159.8, 3 pages, dated Dec. 21, 2004.
Partial European Search Report for Application No. 01981621.4, 5 pages, dated Feb. 25, 2005.
European Office Action for Application No. 06013825.2, 9 pages, dated Sep. 17, 2008.
European Office Action for Application No. 09167669.2, 7 pages, dated Dec. 28, 2009.
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. 99967261.1, 3 pages, dated Mar. 6, 2002.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Applicaiton No. PCT/US2004/040885, 6 pages, dated Jun. 7, 2006.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2011/038013, 9 pages, dated Nov. 27, 2012.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US04/40885, 3 pages, dated Feb. 21, 2006.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2011/038013, 7 pages, dated Jan. 25, 2012.
International Preliminary Examination Report for Application No. PCT/US01/06414, 6 pages, dated Aug. 27, 2002.
International Preliminary Examination Report for Application No. PCT/US01/32233, 5 pages, dated Dec. 10, 2003.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/003192, 12 pages, dated Nov. 23, 2010.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2011/034998, 10 pages, dated Nov. 6, 2012.
International Preliminary Examination Report for Application No. PCT/US99/29317, 4 pages, dated Aug. 14, 2000.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US99/29317, 2 pages, dated Apr. 6, 2000.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US01/06414, 5 pages, dated Aug. 7, 2001.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US01/32233, 3 pages, dated Jun. 12, 2003.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2009/003192, 8 pages, dated Jun. 1, 2010.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2011/034998, 5 pages, dated Jul. 17, 2012.
Notice of Opposition to European Patent No. 1137941 (Application No. 99 967 261.1), 29 pages, dated May 11, 2010.
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US01/06414, 5 pages, dated Feb. 7, 2002.
Ackermann, Maximilian et al., “Anti-VEGFR2 and anti-IGF-1R-Adnectins inhibit Ewing's sarcoma A673-xenograft growth and normalize tumor vascular architecture,” Angiogenesis, vol. 15:685-695 (2012).
Apte, Aaron N. et al., “Anchor-Ligated cDNA Libraries: A Technique for Generating a cDNA Library for the Immediate Cloning of the 5′ Ends of mRNAs,” BioTechniques, vol. 15(5):890-893 (1993).
Bae, Dong-Goo et al., “Arginine-rich Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Peptides Inhibit Tumor Growth and Metastasis by Blocking Angiogenesis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275(18):13588-13596 (2000).
Baggio, Rick et al., “Identification of epitope-like consensus motifs using mRNA display,” Journal of Molecular Recognition, vol. 15:126-134 (2002).
Baron, Martin et al., “H NMR Assignment and Secondary Structure of the Cell Adhesion Type III Module of Fibronectin,” Biochemistry, vol. 31:2068-2073 (1992).
Baron, Martin et al., “Protein modules,” TIBS, vol. 16:13-17 (1991).
Batori, Vincent et al., “Exploring the potential of the monobody scaffold: effects of loop elongation on the stability of a fibronectin type III domain,” Protein Engineering, vol. 15(12):1015-1020 (2002).
Bianchi, Elisabetta et al., “High Level Expression and Rational Mutagenesis of a Designed Protein, the Minibody,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 236:649-659 (1994).
Boder, Eric T. et al., “Directed evolution of antibody fragments with monovalent femtomolar antigen-binding affinity,” PNAS, vol. 97(20):10701-10705 (2000).
Boder, Eric T. et al., “Yeast surface display for screening combinatorial polypeptide libraries,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 15:553-557 (1997).
Boldicke, Thomas et al., “Anti-VEGFR-2 scFvs for Cell Isolation. Single-Chain Antibodies Recognizing the Human Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 (VEGFR-2/flk-1) on the Surface of Primary Endothelial Cells and Preselected CD34+ Cells from Cord Blood,” Stem Cells, vol. 19:24-36 (2001).
Bork, Peer et al., “Proposed acquisition of an animal protein domain by bacteria,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 89:8990-8994 (1992).
Bork, P. et al., “The Immunoglobulin Fold, Structural Classification, Sequence Patterns and Common Core,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 242:309-320 (1994).
Brenchley, P.E.C. et al., “Angiogenesis in inflammatory joint disease: a target for therapeutic intervention,” Clin. Exp. Immunol., vol. 121:426-429 (2000).
Brock, Kenny V. et al., “Nucleotide sequencing of 5′ and 3′ termini of bovine viral diarrhea virus by RNA ligation and PCR,” Journal of Virological Methods, vol. 38:39-46 (1992).
Bruzik, James P. et al., “Spliced leader RNAs from lower eukaryotes are trans-spliced in mammalian cells,” Nature, vol. 360(6405):692-695 (1992).
Campbell, Lain D. et al., “Building proteins with fibronectin type III modules, Fibronectin type III modules are versatile components of many proteins. Recent structures of module pairs show how these modules are joined together,” Structure, vol. 2:333-337 (1994).
Carvalho, Jozelio Freire et al., “Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in Autoimmune Diseases,” Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 27(3):246-256 (2007).
Clackson, Tim et al., “In vitro selection from protein and peptide libraries,” TibTech, vol. 12(5):173-184 (1994).
Clackson, Tim et al., “Making antibody fragments using phage display libraries,” Nature, vol. 352:624-628 (1991).
Claffey, Kevin P. et al., “Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Regulation by Cell Differentiation and Activated Second Messenger Pathways,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 267(23):16317-16323 (1992).
Clarke, Jane et al., “Folding and Stability of a Fibronectin Type III Domain of Human Tenascin,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 270:771-778 (1997).
Copie, Valerie et al., “Solution Structure and Dynamics of Linked Cell Attachment Modules of Mouse Fibronectin Containing the RGD and Synergy Regions: Comparison wtih the Human Fibronectin Crystal Structure,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 277:663-682 (1998).
Cota, Ernesto et al., “Two Proteins with the Same Structure Respond very Differently to Mutation: The Role of Plasticity in Protein Stability,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 302:713-725 (2000).
Cujec, Thomas P. et al., “Selection of v-Abl Tyrosine Kinase Substrate Sequences from Randomized Peptide and Cellular Proteomic Libraries Using mRNA Display,” Chemistry & Biology, vol. 9:253-264 (2002).
Devlin, James J. et al., “Random Peptide Libraries: A Source of Specific Protein Binding Molecules,” Science, vol. 249:404-406 (1990).
Dgene Search Results, 33 pages (2005).
Dickinson, Craig D. et al., “Crystals of the Cell-binding Module of Fibronectin Obtained from a Series of Recombinant Fragments Differing in Length,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 238:123-127 (1994).
Dickinson, Craig D. et al., “Crystal Structure of the Tenth Type III Cell Adhesion Module of Human Fibronectin,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 236:1079-1092 (1994).
Ely, Kathryn R. et al., “Common molecular scaffold for two unrelated RGD molecules,” Protein Engineering, vol. 8 (8):823-827 (1995).
Fenton, Bruce et al., “Pathophysiological effects of antibodies to IGF-1R and VEGFR-2 plus fractionated radiation in DU145 prostate carcinoma xenografts,” Radiation Research Society 2005 Annual Meeting, Abstract No. PP109, 1 page (2005).
Ferguson, Kimberly C. et al., “The SL1 trans-spliced leader RNA performs an essential embryonic function in Caenorhabditis elegans that can also be supplied by SL2 RNA,” Genes & Development, vol. 10:1543-1556 (1996).
Ghosh, Gourisankar et al., “Structure of NF-kappaB p50 homodimer bound to a kappaB site,” Nature, vol. 373:303-310 (1995).
Goedert, M. et al., “Cloning and sequencing of the cDNA encoding an isoform of microtubule-associated protein tau containing four tandem repeats: differential expression of tau protein mRNAs in human brain,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 8(2):393-399 (1989).
Grant, Richard P. et al., “Structural Requirements for Biological Activity of the Ninth and Tenth Fill Domains of Human Fibronectin,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272(10):6159-6166 (1997).
Hamers-Casterman, C. et al., “Naturally occurring antibodies devoid of light chains,” Nature, vol. 363:446-448 (1993).
Hammond, Philip W. et al., “In Vitro Selection and Characterization of Bcl-XL-binding Proteins from a Mix of Tissue-specific mRNA Display Libraries,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276(24):20898-20906 (2001).
Harpaz, Yahouda et al., “Many of the IMmunoglobulin Superfamily Domains in Cell Adhesion Molecules and Surface Receptors Belong to a New Structural Set Which is Close to That Containing Variable Domains,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 238:528-539 (1994).
Hocking, Denise C. et al., “A Novel Role for the Integrin-binding III-10 Module in Fibronectin Matrix Assembly,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 133(2):431-444 (1996).
Hocking, Denise C. et al., “Activation of Distinct alpha5betal-mediated Signaling Pathways by Fibronectin's Cell Adhesion and Matrix Assembly Domains,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 141(1):241-253 (1998).
Huang, Hu et al., “Blockade of VEGFR1 and 2 Suppresses Pathological Angiogenesis and Vascular Leakage in the Eye,” PLoS One, vol. 6(6):e21411, 14 pages, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021411 (2011).
Husimi, Y. et al., “Role of the Virus-type Strategy in Encoded Molecular Evolution,” Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, vol. 65(Suppl. 1):64 (1996).
Hynes, Richard O. et al., “Integrins: Versability, Modulation, and Signaling in Cell Adhesion,” Cell, vol. 69:11-25 (1992).
Jain, Rakesh K. et al., “Dissecting Tumour Pathophysiology Using Intravital Microscopy,” Nature, vol. 2:266-276 (2002).
Jakob, W. et al., “The chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane as a bioassay for angiogenesis factors: Reactions induced by carrier materials,” Exp. Path. Bd., vol. 15:241-249 (1978).
Jung, Gyoo Yeol et al., “A Functional Protein Chip for Pathway Optimization and in Vitro Metabolic Engineering,” Science, vol. 304:428-431 (2004).
Keefe, Anthony D. et al., “Functional proteins from a random-sequence library,” Nature, vol. 410:715-718 (2001).
Kohler, G. et al., “Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity,” Nature, vol. 256:495-497 (1975).
Koide, Akiko et al., “Stabilization of a Fibronectin Type III Domain by the Removal of Unfavorable Electrostatic Interactions on the Protein Surface,” Biochemistry, vol. 40:10326-10333 (2001).
Koide, Shohei et al., “Directed Evolution of Fibronectin Type III Domain to Novel Ligand Binding Proteins,” FASEB J., vol. 11(9 Suppl.), Poster No. M40, p. A837, (1997).
Koide, Shohei et al., “Directed Evolution of Fibronectin Type III Domain to Novel Ligand Binding Proteins,” The Faseb Journal, vol. 11(9):A1155, Poster No. 1739 (1997).
Ku, Jung et al., “Alternate protein frameworks for molecular recognition,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 92:6552-6556 (1995).
Kurz, Markus et al., “Psoralen photo-crosslinked mRNA-puromycin conjugates: a novel template for the rapid and facile preparation of mRNA-protein fusions,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 28(18):e83, 5 pages (2000).
Leahy, Daniel J. et al., “Structure of a Fibronectin Type III Domain from Tenascin Phased by MAD Analysis of the Selenomethionyl Protein,” Science, vol. 258:987-991 (1992).
Lee, Grace et al., “Strong Inhibition of Fibrogen Binding to Platelet Receptor Alpha2b beta 3 by RGD Sequences installed into the Presentation Scaffold,” Prot. Eng., vol. 6:745-754 (1993).
Lipovsek, Dasa et al., “Evolution of an Interloop Disulfide Bond in High-Affinity Antibody Mimics Based on Fibronectin Type III Domain and Selected by Yeast Surface Display: Molecular Convergence with Single-Domain Camelid and Shark Antibodies,” J. Mol. Biol., 368:1024-1041 (2007).
Lipovsek, Dasa et al., “In-vitro protein evolution by ribosome display and mRNA display,” Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 290:51-67 (2004).
Litvinovich, Sergei V. et al., “Interactions Between Type III Domains in the 110 kDa Cell-binding Fragments of Fibronectin,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 248:611-626 (1995).
Lombardo, A. et al., “Conformational flexibility and crystallization of tandemly linked type III modules of human fibronectin,” Protein Science, vol. 5:1934-1938 (1996).
Lu, Dan et al., “Tailoring in Vitro Selection for a Picomolar Affinity Human Antibody Directed against Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 for Enhanced Neutralizing Activity,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278(44):43496-43507 (2003).
Lyden, David et al., “Impaired recruitment of bone-marrow-derived endothelial and hematopoietic precursor cells blocks tumor angiogenesis and growth,” Nature Medicine, vol. 7(11):1194-1201 (2001).
Maeda, Hiroshi et al., “SMANCS and polymer-conjugated macromolecular drugs: advantages in cancer chemotherapy,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 46:169-185 (2001).
Main, Alison L. et al., “The Three-Dimensional Structure of the Tenth Type III Module of Fibronectin: An Insight into RGD-Mediated Interactions,” Cell, vol. 71:671-678 (1992).
Mamluk, Roni et al., “Anti-tumor effect of CT-322 as an adnectin inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2,” mAbs, vol. 2(2):199-208 (2010).
Markland, William et al., “Iterative Optimization of High-Affinity Protease Inhibitors Using Phage Display. 1. Plasmin,” Biochemistry, vol. 35:8045-8057 (1996).
Markland, William et al., “Iterative Optimization of High-Affinity Protease Inhibitors Using Phage Display. 2. Plasma Kallikrein and Thrombin,” Biochemistry, vol. 35:8058-8067 (1996).
Maruyama, Kazuo et al., “Oligo-capping: a simple method to replace the cap structure of eukaryotic mRNAs with oligoribonucleotides,” Gene, vol. 138:171-174 (1994).
Matsushima, Ayako et al., “Modification of E. coli Asparaginase with 2.4-Bis(O-Methoxypolyethylene Glycol)-6-Chloro-S-Triazine(Activated PEG2); Disapperance of Binding Ability Towards Anti-serum and Retention of Enzymic Activity,” Chemistry Letters, pp. 773-776 (1980).
Mattheakis, Larry C. et al., “An in vitro polysome display system for identifying ligands from very large peptide libraries,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 91:9022-9026 (1994).
McConnell, Stephen J. et al., “Tendamistat as a Scaffold for Conformationally Constrained Phage Peptide Libraries,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 250:460-470 (1995).
McCleod, D. Scott et al., “Localization of VEGF Receptor-2 (KDR/Flk-1) and Effects of Blocking It in Oxygen-Induced Retinopathy,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 43(2):474-482 (2002).
McPherson, Michael et al., “Drug Receptor Identification from Multiple Tissues Using Cellular-Derived mRNA Display Libraries,” Chemistry & Biology, vol. 9:691-698 (2002).
Meinke, A. et al., “Cellulose-Binding Polypeptides from Cellulomonas fimi: Endoglucanase D (CenD), a Family A beta-1,4-Glucanase,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 175(7):1910-1918 (1993).
Meissner, Markus et al., “Suppression of VEGFR2 Expression in Human Endothelial Cells by Dimethylfumarate Treatment: Evidence for Anti-Angiogenic Action,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 131:1356-1364 (2011).
Meyer, Rosana D. et al., “Comparative Structure-Function Analysis of VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, What Have We Learned from Chimeric Systems,?” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., vol. 995:200-207 (2003).
Muller, Christoph W. et al., “Structure of the NF-kappaB p50 homodimer bound to DNA,” Nature, vol. 373:311-317 (1995).
Muyldermans, Serge, “Single domain camel antibodies: current status,” Reviews in Molecular Biotechnology, vol. 74:277-302 (2001).
Nemoto, Naoto et al., “In vitro virus: Bonding of mRNA bearing puromycin at the 3′-terminal end to the C-terminal end of its encoded protein on the ribosome in vitro,” FEBS Letters, vol. 414:405-408 (1997).
Ng, Eugene W.M. et al., “Targeting angiogenesis, the underlying disorder in neovascular age-related macular degeneration,” Can. J. Ophthalmol., vol. 40:352-368 (2005).
Niemeyer, Christof M. et al., “Oligonucleotide-directed self-assembly of proteins: semisynthetic DNA—streptavidin hybrid molecules as connectors for the generation of macroscopic arrays and the construction of supramolecular bioconjugates,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 22(25):5530-5539 (1994).
Nilsen, Timothy W., “Trans-Splicing in Protozoa and Helminths,” Infections Agents and Disease, vol. 1:212-218 (1992).
Nord, Karin et al., “A combinatorial library of an alpha-helical bacterial receptor domain,” Prot. Eng., vol. 8:601-608 (1995).
Nord, Karin et al., “Binding proteins selected from combinatorial libraries of an alpha-helical bacterial receptor domain,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 15:772-777 (1997).
Nygren, Per-Ake et al., “Scaffolds for engineering novel binding sites in proteins,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 7:463-469 (1997).
Patel, Neela et al., “A Selective and Oral Small Molecule Inhibitor of Vascular Epithelial Growth Factor (VEGFR)-2 and VEGFR-1 Inhibits Neovascularization and Vascular Permeability,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 306(3):838-845 (2003).
Phillips, Anthony J., “The challenge of gene therapy and DNA delivery,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 53:1169-1174 (2001).
Plaxco, Kevin W. et al., “A Comparison of the Folding Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Two Homologous Fibronectin Type III Modules,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 270:763-770 (1997).
Plaxco, Kevin W. et al., “Rapid refolding of a proline-rich all-beta-sheet fibronectin type III module,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 93:10703-10706 (1996).
Posey, J. et al., “A Phase I Trial of an Anti-KDR (VEGFR2) Chimeric Antibody in Patients with Liver Metastases in Colorectal Cancer (CRC),” Slides from presentation at 2002 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, 20 pages, (2002).
Potts, Jennifer R. et al., “Fibronectin structure and assembly,” Current Biology, vol. 6:648-655 (1994).
Potts, Jennifer R. et al., “Structure and Function of Fibronectin Modules,” Matrix Biology, vol. 15:313-320 (1996).
Proescholdt, Martin A. et al., “Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Is Expressed in Multiple Sclerosis Plaques and Can Induce Inflammatory Lesions in Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis Rats,” Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, vol. 61(10):914-925 (2002).
Richards, Julie et al., “Engineered Fibronectin Type III Domain with a RGDWXE Sequence Binds with Enhanced Affinity and Specificity to Human alphavbeta3 Integrin,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 326:1475-1488 (2003).
Roberts, Richard W. et al., “RNA-peptide fusions for the in vitro selection of peptides and proteins,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 94:12297-12302 (1997).
Roberts, Richard W., “Totally in vitro protein selection using mRNA-protein fusions and ribosome display,” Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, vol. 3:268-273 (1999).
Rottgen, Peter et al., “A human pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor presenting a hyperveriable highly constrained epitope via monovalent phagemid display,” Gene, vol. 164:243-250 (1995).
Scott, Jamie K. et al., “Searching for Peptide Ligands with an Epitope Library,” Science, vol. 249:386-390 (1990).
Shibata, K. et al., “An attempt to substitute the cell binding domain of human fibronectin in lambda phage J protein: Computer design and expression,” Biochimie, vol. 75:459-465 (1993).
Shibuya, Masabumi, “Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2: Its unique signaling and specific ligand, VEGFE,” Cancer Sci., vol. 94(9):751-756 (2003).
Shima, David T. et al., “The Mouse Gene for Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271(7):3877-3883 (1996).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130157948 A1 Jun 2013 US
Provisional Applications (5)
Number Date Country
61178279 May 2009 US
61200164 Nov 2008 US
61200282 Nov 2008 US
61212966 Apr 2009 US
61227330 Jul 2009 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12625217 Nov 2009 US
Child 13692555 US