The present disclosure relates to inflatable actuators.
Among other drawbacks, slow actuation speed of fluid-driven soft actuators reduces their task efficiency and greatly limits their applications. Accordingly, improved actuators remain desirable.
In various embodiments, an actuator may include a body. The body may include a plurality of pairs of frustums. The body may be configured to receive a fluid to extend the actuator. The body may be configured to remove a fluid to contract the actuator.
In various embodiments, each pair of frustums may include two thin frustum shells. The thin frustum shells may share a common base circle diameter. One of the thin frustum shells may be configured with a large base angle. The other of the thin frustum shells may be configured with a small base angle. The thin frustum shell configured with a large base angle may include a base angle of about 55 degrees. The thin frustum shell configured with a small base angle may include a base angle of about 40 degrees.
In various embodiments, the two thin frustum shells may be coupled by a soft folding hinge. The soft folding hinge may include an elastomer. In various embodiments, a portion of the thin frustum shell configured with a large base angle may be shaved off and replaced by an elastomer. In various embodiments, the body may include an elastomer. The elastomer may include silicone.
In various embodiments, the body may include a support frustum. In various embodiments, each frustum may be threaded with yarn. In various embodiments, the plurality of pairs of frustums may include a thermoplastic polymer. The thermoplastic polymer may include polyethylene terephthalate (PET). In various embodiments, the actuator may include a plate. The plate may include a vent. The vent may be configured to be screw-mounted onto a surface.
In various embodiments, a method for forming actuator may include folding a thermoplastic polymer sheet into a frustum shape. The method may include threading yarn around the thermoplastic polymer sheet. The method may include molding, in a first mold, a plurality of thermoplastic polymer frustums with an elastomer to form a plurality of elastomer frustums with embedded thermoplastic polymer. The method may include molding, in a second mold, the plurality of elastomer frustums to form an actuator shape. The second mold may include a soft thermoplastic polyurethane inner mold. The method may include demolding the actuator. The method may include inserting a thermoplastic polymer support shell into the actuator.
In various embodiments, the thermoplastic polymer may include polyethylene terephthalate (PET). In various embodiments, the plurality of thermoplastic polymer frustums may include at least one thermoplastic polymer frustum with a large base angle and at least one thermoplastic polymer frustum with a small base angle. In various embodiments, the elastomer may include silicone.
In various embodiments, an apparatus may include a plurality of actuators. In various embodiments, each actuator may include a body. The body may include a plurality of pairs of frustums. The body may be configured to receive a fluid to extend the actuator. The body may be configured to remove a fluid to contract the actuator.
The apparatus may include a first surface. The first surface may be operably connected to a first end of each actuator. The apparatus may include a second surface. The second surface may be operable connected to a second end of each actuator.
The contents of this section are intended as a simplified introduction to the disclosure, and are not intended to limit the scope of any claim.
With reference to the following description and accompanying drawings:
The following description is of various exemplary embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability or configuration of the present disclosure in any way. Rather, the following description is intended to provide a convenient illustration for implementing various embodiments including the best mode. As will become apparent, various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of the elements described in these embodiments without departing from principles of the present disclosure.
For the sake of brevity, conventional techniques and components may not be described in detail herein. Furthermore, the connecting lines shown in various figures contained herein are intended to represent exemplary functional relationships and/or physical couplings between various elements. It should be noted that many alternative or additional functional relationships or physical connections may be present in exemplary systems and/or components thereof.
With reference now to
In various exemplary embodiments, an actuator comprises a body comprising a plurality of pairs of frustums. The body is configured to receive a fluid to extend the actuator and to remove the fluid to contract the actuator.
In some embodiments, each pair of frustums comprises two thin frustum shells sharing a common base circle diameter; one of the shells is configured with a large base angle and the other of the shells is configured with a small base angle; and/or the two frustum shells are coupled by a soft folding hinge.
In some exemplary embodiments, a method for forming an actuator comprises:
With reference now to
With continued reference to
Frustums 110 and 111 may have a thickness of between 0.1 and 4 mm. In the preferred embodiment, frustum 110 has a thickness of less than lmm and frustrum 111 has a thickness of less than 3 mm.
A soft folding hinge 120 may connect the frustum shells 110, 111 to one another. Soft folding hinge 120 may be formed from a polymeric material. Soft folding hinge 120 may be formed from an elastomer. For example, soft folding hinge 120 may be formed from ethylene propylene rubber, ethylene propylene diene rubber, epichlorohydrin rubber, polyacrylic rubber, silicone rubber, fluorosilicone rubber, fluoroelastomers, perfluoroelastomers, polyether block amides, chlorosulfonated polyethylene, ethylene-vinyl acetate, or any suitable combination thereof. Soft folding hinge 120 may be formed from a thermoset. For example, soft folding hinge 120 may be formed from polyisoprene, polybutadiene, chloroprene rubber, polychloroprene, neoprene, butyl rubber, a halogenated butyl rubber, styrene-butadiene rubber, nitrile rubber, or any suitable combination thereof. Soft folding hinge 120 may be formed from a thermoplastic elastomer. For example, soft folding hinge 120 may be formed from a styrenic block copolymer, thermoplastic polyolefinelastomers, thermoplastic vulcanizates, thermoplastic polyurethanes, thermoplastic copolyester, thermoplastic polyamides, or any suitable combination thereof. In various embodiments, the soft folding hinge 120 may be formed from any moldable material with a hardness of 00 to 90 ShoreA on the Shore Hardness Scale. In a nonlimiting example, soft folding hinge 120 may be formed from silicone rubber.
Soft folding hinge 120 may be formed from a material that has a high extension ratio. For example, soft folding hinge 120 may be formed from a material that has an extension ratio between about 1 and about 12, more preferably between about 3 and about 10. Soft folding hinge 120 may be formed from a material that can endure high pressure without blasting at relatively thin thickness.
With continued reference to
This unique feature enables the fast snap-through discrete elongation/compression behaviors of actuator 102. When an uneven force is applied to frustums 140, 141, frustum 140 may partially fold to frustum 141, leading to a bending motion. The natural state of actuator 102 can be adjusted by stacking the different numbers of pairs of frustums in series. For example, a stack of frustums may contain 2 pairs of frustums, 3 pairs of frustums, 4 pairs of frustums, 5 pairs of frustums, or more.
With continued reference to
The elastomer is desirably configured with a high extension ratio. For example, the elastomer may be configured with an extension ratio of between about 1 and about 12, more preferably between about 3 and about 10. The elastomer may be able to endure high pressure without blasting at relatively thin thickness. In some examples, the elastomer material may have a thickness of about 1 mm, about 2 mm, about 3 mm, about 4 mm, about 5 mm, about 10 mm, about 20 mm, or greater. In various embodiments, the elastomer may be proportional in size to the actuator 101. For example, a small actuator may utilize an elastomer with a thickness of about 2 mm, while a larger actuator may utilize an elastomer with a thickness of about 10 mm. In the preferred embodiment, the maximum thickness is about 3 mm.
As shown in
To maintain both the capability of elongation and retraction, a thin support shell 115 may be utilized for the elastomer wall of frustum shell 110 to prevent the elastomer material from deforming. Otherwise, actuator 101 may be unable to return to its original compressed position because the elastomer wall will be sucked inward and take up the space where frustum shell 111 folds into. Support shell 115 has about the same shape as frustum shell 110 and is held in place by the shape of the inner wall. Support shell is not embedded into the elastomer to avoid constraining the elastomer's elongation property. Support shell 115 may be formed from a polymeric material. Support shell 115 may be formed from a plastic. Support shell 115 may be formed from a rigid plastic. Support shell 155 may be formed from a flexible plastic. In some examples, support shell 115 may be formed from poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET). In various embodiments, the support shell 115 may be formed from any hard material with a thickness of less than about lmm. Support shell 115 may have a thickness of between about 1 mm and about 10 mm. Support shell 115 may have a thickness of between about 2 mm and about 9 mm. Support shell 115 may have a thickness of between about 4 mm and about 7 mm. Support shell 115 may have a thickness of about 5 mm.
In various embodiments, silicone rubber may be chosen as the elastomer for the extensible air chamber. A polyethylene terephthalate (PET) sheet may be selected as the material for the thin frustum shells and support shells. In order to embed PET into the silicone rubber, yarn is wrapped around the shell to serve as a cover for the sharp edge and as a medium that can attached to the silicone strongly. Alternatively or additionally, natural or synthetic fibers may be wrapped around the shell. The fibers may be natural fibers. For example, the fibers may include cotton, silk, linen, bamboo, hemp, maize, nettle, soy, wool, alpaca, angora, mohair, llama, cashmere, camel hair, yak hair, possum hair, musk ox hair, other animal hair, or any suitable combination thereof. The fibers may be synthetic fibers. For example, the fibers may include nylon, acrylic fiber, rayon, polyester, or any suitable combination thereof. The fibers may be made of any material that is able to absorb the molding.
With reference now to
With reference again to
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Actuator 230 may contain 2 pairs of frustums, 3 pairs of frustums, 4 pairs of frustums, 5 pairs of frustums, or more.
As shown in
With returning reference to
With continued reference to
With continued reference to
With reference now to
With reference now to
The model contains variables defined by the equations below.
where m, u, ln, and pm are the mass, input pressure set-point, natural state length, and the air pressure inside the chamber of the actuator, respectively. k(u), b(u), a(u), and f3(u) are input-dependent parameters. γ=5.577 is the coefficient that maps the chamber's air pressure to the output force, identified through the aforementioned payload test, described with reference to
With reference now to
While the principles of this disclosure have been shown in various embodiments, many modifications of structure, arrangements, proportions, the elements, materials and components, used in practice, which are particularly adapted for a specific environment and operating requirements may be used without departing from the principles and scope of this disclosure. These and other changes or modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure.
The present disclosure has been described with reference to various embodiments. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the specification is to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure. Likewise, benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described above with regard to various embodiments. However, benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential feature or element.
As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Also, as used herein, the terms “coupled,” “coupling,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a physical connection, an electrical connection, a magnetic connection, an optical connection, a communicative connection, a functional connection, and/or any other connection. When language similar to “at least one of A, B, or C” or “at least one of A, B, and C” is used in the specification or claims, the phrase is intended to mean any of the following: (1) at least one of A; (2) at least one of B; (3) at least one of C; (4) at least one of A and at least one of B; (5) at least one of B and at least one of C; (6) at least one of A and at least one of C; or (7) at least one of A, at least one of B, and at least one of C.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/327,691, filed Apr. 5, 2022, entitled “Bistable Elastomeric Actuator.” The content of the foregoing application is hereby incorporated by reference (except for any subject matter disclaimers or disavowals, and except to the extent of any conflict with the disclosure of the present application, in which case the disclosure of the present application shall control).
This invention was made with government support under 1800940 awarded by the National Science Foundation. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2150904 | Becker | Mar 1939 | A |
3319532 | Pridham, Jr. | May 1967 | A |
3645173 | Yarlott | Feb 1972 | A |
4120635 | Langecker | Oct 1978 | A |
4464980 | Yoshida | Aug 1984 | A |
4629641 | Paullin | Dec 1986 | A |
4800723 | Clot | Jan 1989 | A |
5697285 | Nappi | Dec 1997 | A |
7134648 | Rode | Nov 2006 | B1 |
9624911 | Griffith | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9765909 | Ashcroft | Sep 2017 | B2 |
10562180 | Telleria | Feb 2020 | B2 |
20170282360 | Telleria | Oct 2017 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Tao, W. et al., “Design, Characterization, and Dynamic Modeling of BEAST: a Bistable Elastomeric Actuator for Swift Tasks”. 2022. p. 1-6. |
Polygerinos, P. et al., “Soft Robotics: Review of Fluid-Driven Intrinsically Soft Devices; Manufacturing, Sensing, Control, and Applications in Human-Robot Interaction,” Advanced Engineering Materials. 2017. vol. 19, No. 12. |
Nguyen, P. H. et al., “Fabric soft poly-limbs for physical assistance of daily living tasks,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation. 2019. pp. 8429-8435. |
Nguyen, P. H. et al., “Design and computational modeling of fabric soft pneumatic actuators for wearable assistive devices,” Scientific reports. 2020. vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 1-13. |
Hao, Y. et al., “Universal soft pneumatic robotic gripper with variable effective length,” Proc. Chinese Control Conference, vol. Aug. 2016, pp. 6109-6114. |
Lashci, C. et al., “Soft robotics: New perspectives for robot bodyware and control,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2014. vol. 2, No. JAN, pp. 1-5. |
Topçu, E. E. et al., “Development of electropneumatic fast switching valve and investigation of its characteristics,” Mechatronics. 2006. vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 365-378. |
Sridar, S. et al., “Towards Untethered Soft Pneumatic Exosuits Using Low-Volume Inflatable Actuator Composites and a Portable Pneumatic Source,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 2020. vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 4062-4069. |
Hutmacher, D. et al., “Ultrafast Soft Actuators,” ResearchSquare. 2021. pp. 1-16. |
Pal, A. et al., “Exploiting Mechanical Instabilities in Soft Robotics: Control, Sensing, and Actuation,” Advanced Materials. 2021. vol. 2006939, p. 2006939. |
Chi, Y. et al., “Bistable and Multistable Actuators for Soft Robots: Structures, Materials, and Functionalities,” Advanced Materials. 2022. vol. 2110384, p. 2110384. |
Ha, C. S. et al., “Design, fabrication, and analysis of lattice exhibiting energy absorption via snap-through behavior,” Materials and Design. 2018. vol. 141, pp. 426-437. |
Gustafson, K. et al., “Model-based design of a multistable origami-enabled crawling robot,” Smart Materials and Structures. 2020. vol. 29, No. 1. |
Gorissen, B. et al., “Inflatable soft jumper inspired by shell snapping,” Science Robotics. 2020. vol. 5, No. 42, pp. 1-8. |
Nguyen, A. K. et al., “A Tri-Stable Soft Robotic Finger Capable of Pinch and Wrap Grasps,” Proc. IEEE Robotics and Automation. 2020. pp. 9028-9034. |
Thuruthel, T. G. et al., “A bistable soft gripper with mechanically embedded sensing and actuation for fast grasping,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. 2020. pp. 1049-1054. |
Tang, Y. et al., “Leveraging elastic instabilities for amplified performance: Spine-inspired high-speed and high-force soft robots,” Science advances, vol. 6, No. 19, p. eaaz6912, 2020. |
Bende, N. P. et al., “Overcurvature induced multistability of linked conical frusta: How a ‘bendy straw’ holds its shape,” Soft Matter. 2018. vol. 14, No. 42, pp. 8636-8642. |
Pan, F. et al., “3D Pixel Mechanical Metamaterials,” Advanced Materials. 2019. vol. 31, No. 25, pp. 1-8. |
McWilliams, J. et al., “Push-on push-off: A compliant bistable gripper with mechanical sensing and actuation,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Soft Robotics, 2021, pp. 622-629. |
Qiao, Z. et al., “Dynamic modeling and motion control of a soft robotic arm segment,” in Proc. American Control Conference, 2019, pp. 5438-5443. |
Zhang, B. “Bistable and multi-stable thin-walled structures,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oxford, 2017. |
Tao W. et al., “Bioinspired design and fabrication principles of reliable fluidic soft actuation modules,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Biomimetics. 2015. pp. 2169-2174. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230313819 A1 | Oct 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63327691 | Apr 2022 | US |