Bistable hinge with reduced stress regions

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6321923
  • Patent Number
    6,321,923
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, April 26, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 27, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A closure is provided for a container opening. The closure includes a base for mounting to the container and a lid movable between a closed position and an open position. The lid and base are connected by a bistable, snap-action hinge structure having a web with a reduced thickness region along a lateral edge.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




This invention relates to a hinge structure for connecting two members, and the hinge structure is particularly suitable for joining a container closure lid to the container closure body.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION AND TECHNICAL PROBLEMS POSED BY THE PRIOR ART




A variety of packages, including dispensing packages or containers, have been developed for personal care products such as shampoo, lotions, etc., as well as for other fluid materials. One type of closure for these kinds of containers typically has a bistable hinge structure connecting a lid to a base mounted over the container opening. The hinge structure has a snap-action biasing force which maintains the lid in a selected closed or open position.




One type of bistable hinge structure incorporated in a closure is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,135,456. This patent discloses a snap-action hinge structure comprising a thin hinge web joining a base and a lid to accommodate movement of the lid between an open and closed position. The hinge structure has two, spaced-apart pivot axes. In particular, the hinge structure incorporates two, spaced-apart hinges, one hinge having an arcuate configuration connecting the lid to the hinge web and the other hinge having an arcuate configuration connecting the base to the hinge web. The two pivot axes are defined by two parallel lines wherein, at points where the two hinges are closest to each other, one line is tangent to the lid hinge and the other line is tangent to the body hinge.




In contrast, the hinge structure for a cylindrical closure disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,403,712 has a single, main geometric axis hinge and has two webs which each is defined by two hinges which diverge on either side of the web. In commercial embodiments of the cylindrical closure having a single axis hinge structure disclosed in the U.S. Pat. No. 4,403,712, the hinge thickness changes along the length of the hinges. The thickness transition regions can define stress risers which may ultimately have a deleterious effect upon the structure during repeated operation.




Also, in some commercial closures which are sold by Seaquist Closures, 711 Fox Street, Box 20, Mukwanago, Wis. 53149, U.S.A., and which include the single axis hinge structure disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,403,712, the web is provided with an increased thickness region adjacent to the lateral edge of the web.




A snap-action hinge structure with significant improved operating characteristics compared to the hinge structures disclosed in the U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,135,456 and 4,403,712 is a dual axis hinge structure disclosed in the U.S. Pat. No. 5,642,824. The hinge structure is of the type that includes a web having a central portion between two wider ends wherein an arcuate hinge connects the base to the web along one side of the web between the ends and wherein an arcuate hinge connects the lid to the web along another side of the web between the ends. The hinge structure includes at least one abutment surface located so that when the lid is in the closed position, the abutment surface extends adjacent the web central portion from near one of the hinges toward the other hinge. During the closing and opening of the lid, the abutment surface is contacted by the web central portion whereby the position of the web is controlled.




Although the dual axis hinge structure disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,642,824 functions with improved operating characteristics, there are some applications, such as those involving a large number of opening and closing cycles, in which the dual axis hinge structure, as well as other biased hinge structures or bistable, snap-action hinge structures, may be more likely to fail or break.




It is believed that in a snap-action hinge structure which includes a web having a wide end, the stresses are unevenly distributed along the lateral edge of the web end. This is thought to increase the stresses where the lateral edge connects with the closure body and lid. Failure or fracture of such hinge structures is typically initiated at those regions where a lateral edge of the hinge structure web connects with the closure body and/or lid.




Thus, it would be desirable to provide an improved snap-action hinge design in which the stresses in the hinge structure could be more carefully controlled. In particular, it would be beneficial if such an improved design could provide a selected or improved distribution of stress along the outer, lateral edges of the hinge structure.




It would be especially desirable to provide a hinge structure which would have reduced stresses where the hinge structure web lateral edges connect with the closure body and/or lid.




An improved hinge structure design should also permit the hinge structure to provide the desired opening and closing angle range for the lid. A hinge structure with such a capability can provide performance features that are desirable in particular applications.




Also, it would be desirable if such an improved hinge structure could be readily incorporated in a closure that would accommodate efficient, high quality, large volume manufacturing techniques with a reduced product reject rate.




Further, such an improved hinge structure should advantageously accommodate its use in closures with a variety of conventional containers having a variety of conventional container finishes, such as conventional threaded or snap-fit attachment configurations.




The present invention provides an improved hinge structure which can accommodate designs having the above-discussed benefits and features.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




According to the present invention, a hinge structure is provided for connecting two members, and the hinge structure is particularly suitable for use in connecting a closure lid to the base of the closure wherein the closure is adapted to be mounted to, or formed as a unitary part of, a container. The hinge structure has enhanced resistance to fracture or failure. The improved resistance to failure results from a configuration that provides a particular distribution of stress along the outer edges of the hinge structure and a concomitant reduction in stress at the points where the outer edges of the hinge structure are connected to the two members, such as a closure body and a closure lid.




The hinge structure is a biased, bistable, snap-action hinge structure. The hinge structure is a continuous structure that is molded unitary with the two members, such as the closure lid and the closure base.




The hinge structure includes a web having a narrow portion and at least one lateral edge. The hinge structure also includes a hinge connecting one of the members to the web along one side of the web. The hinge structure includes another hinge connecting the other of the members to the web along another side of the web.




The web has a region of reduced thickness. The reduced thickness region is located between, and is reduced in thickness relative to, the two hinges. The reduced thickness region extends to the lateral edge.




In a preferred embodiment, the reduced thickness region is defined by a generally trapezoid shaped recess having one side along the lateral edge of the web. In a presently most preferred embodiment, the web has a substantially uniform thickness except for the reduced thickness region which has a thickness which is about one third less than the remaining portion of the web thickness.




In one preferred use of the hinge structure of the present invention, the hinge structure is included in a closure provided for an opening to a container interior. The closure includes a base for mounting to the container over the opening. The base defines a discharge aperture communicating with the opening. The closure includes a lid movable between a closed position occluding the aperture and an open position spaced from the aperture. The bistable, snap-action hinge structure connects the lid to the base.




The hinge structure includes a web having a narrow, central portion between two wider ends which each defines a lateral edge. The hinge structure also includes an arcuate hinge connecting the lid to the web along one side of the web between the lateral edges. The hinge structure includes another arcuate hinge connecting the closure base to the web along another side of the web between the lateral edges.




The web has two spaced-apart regions of reduced thickness. The reduced thickness regions are located between, and are reduced in thickness relative to, the arcuate hinges. Each reduced thickness region extends to one of the adjacent, lateral edges.




Numerous other advantages and features of the present invention will become readily apparent from the following detailed description of the invention, from the claims, and from the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




In the accompanying drawings forming part of the specification, in which like numerals are employed to designate like parts throughout the same,





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of a first embodiment of a hinge structure of the present invention as incorporated in a closure shown in the as-molded open position;





FIG. 2

is a top plan view of the closure in the fully open, as-molded condition;





FIG. 3

is a side elevational view of the closure shown in the as-molded open condition and mounted on a container;





FIG. 4

is a greatly enlarged, fragmentary, top plan view of the hinge structure region of the closure shown in the fully open, as-molded condition, and the plan view is taken generally along the plane


4





4


in

FIG. 3

;





FIG. 5

is a fragmentary, perspective view of the hinge structure shown in

FIG. 4

;





FIG. 6

is a fragmentary, elevational view taken generally along the plane


6





6


in

FIG. 4

;





FIG. 7

is a fragmentary, cross-sectional view taken generally along the plane


7





7


in

FIG. 4

;





FIG. 8

is a rear elevational view of the closure in the fully closed condition to show the closed hinge structure;





FIG. 9

is a view similar to

FIG. 6

, but

FIG. 9

shows a second embodiment of the hinge structure; and





FIG. 10

is a view similar to

FIG. 6

, but

FIG. 10

shows a third embodiment of the hinge structure.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




While this invention is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, this specification and the accompanying drawings disclose only some specific forms as examples of the invention. The invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments so described, and the scope of the invention will be pointed out in the appended claims.




For ease of description, a closure incorporating the hinge structure of this invention is described in various positions, and terms such as upper, lower, horizontal, etc., are used with reference to these positions. It will be understood, however, that the closure may be manufactured, stored, and used in orientations other than the ones described.




With reference to the figures, a first embodiment of a hinge structure of the present invention is illustrated in

FIGS. 1-8

as incorporated in a closure represented generally in some of those figures by reference number


40


.




The closure


40


is adapted to be disposed on a container, such as a container


42


(

FIG. 3

) which has a conventional mouth or opening (not visible) formed by a neck


43


(

FIG. 3

) or other suitable structure. The container neck


43


may have a circular or non-circular cross-sectional configuration, and the body of the container


42


may have another cross-sectional configuration, such as an oval cross-sectional shape, for example. The closure


40


is molded from a thermoplastic material compatible with the container contents.




The container


42


may be stored and used in the orientation shown in

FIG. 1

wherein the closure


40


is at the top of the container


42


. The container


42


may also be normally stored in an inverted position (not illustrated). When stored in the inverted position, the container


42


employs the closure


40


as a support base.




The container


42


is typically a squeezable container having a flexible wall or walls which can be grasped by the user and compressed to increase the internal pressure within the container


42


so as to squeeze the product out of the container when the closure


40


is opened (as explained in detail hereinafter). The container wall typically has sufficient, inherent resiliency so that when the squeezing forces are removed, the container wall returns to its normal, unstressed shape.




The closure


40


includes a base or body


50


for being mounted to the container neck


43


. The base


50


includes a skirt


52


(

FIG. 3

) which has a conventional snap-fit bead or groove (not visible) or other suitable means for engaging suitable cooperating means, such as a mating bead or grove (not visible) on the container neck


43


to secure the closure base


50


to the container


42


. The closure body


50


could alternatively include an interior, annular connector wall with internal threads for engaging external threads on the container neck


43


.




At the top of the closure base skirt


52


, the closure base


50


has a transverse deck


56


(

FIG. 5

) which extends over the upper, distal end of the container neck


43


. The deck


56


typically has a downwardly extending, annular, internal flexible seal (not visible) which is received against the inner edge of the container neck


43


in the container neck opening so as to provide a leak-tight seal between the closure base deck


56


and the container neck


43


.




As illustrated in

FIGS. 1-3

, the closure base deck


56


has a spout


62


projecting upwardly to define a discharge aperture


60


over the container neck opening.




The closure


40


includes a lid


70


(

FIGS. 1-3

) connected to the base


50


with a hinge structure


80


. The lid


70


includes a peripheral skirt


82


(

FIG. 1

) defining a peripheral termination surface


84


. The lid peripheral surface


84


is adapted to contact, or at least confront, the closure base


50


when the lid


70


is closed. Preferably, as illustrated in

FIG. 1

, the closure base


50


defines a peripheral shoulder


86


recessed below the main portion of the deck


56


, and the recessed shoulder


86


confronts the surface


84


of the lid skirt


82


when the lid


70


is closed.




The closure lid


70


includes a transverse deck or cover


88


(FIG.


1


). Extending from the underside of the lid cover


88


is an annular member


90


which is adapted to be received in, and sealingly engage the interior of, the closure base spout


62


when the lid


70


is closed.




In the preferred embodiment, the hinge structure


80


is integrally molded as a unitary part of the closure with the base


50


and lid


70


. One preferred material for molding the closure is polypropylene. It has been found that this material provides a relatively strong, durable closure. The material functions in the hinge structure


80


with desirable biasing forces, has the capability for withstanding typical loads imposed by a user of the closure when the user opens and closes the lid


70


, and has the capability for accommodating a relatively high number of opening and closing cycles without failure.




As illustrated in

FIGS. 4 and 5

, the hinge structure


80


includes a web


100


having a central, narrow portion between two wider ends


102


. The two ends


102


are generally parallel in the preferred embodiment illustrated. The hinge structure


80


includes basic features disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,642,824 which is incorporated herein by reference thereto to the extent not inconsistent herewith.




A first, arcuate hinge


121


connects the base


50


to the web


100


along one side of the web


100


between the ends


102


. A second, arcuate hinge


122


connects the lid


70


to the web


100


along another side of web


100


between the ends


102


. As illustrated in

FIG. 4

, the first hinge


121


lies on an arc concentric with the arc defining an adjacent peripheral portion of the closure base


50


, and the second hinge


122


lies on an arc defining an adjacent peripheral portion of the lid


70


. As illustrated in

FIG. 8

, the first hinge


121


lies in an upwardly convex curve on the side of the closure base


50


. As illustrated in

FIG. 8

, the second hinge


122


lies on an upwardly concave curve on the side of the closure lid


70


.




In a preferred embodiment as illustrated in

FIG. 8

, the inner surface of the first hinge


121


has a particular configuration when the lid is fully open. Specifically, with reference to

FIG. 6

, the inner surface of the first hinge


121


(when the lid is fully open) has a curved, radius surface defined between the arcuate line


128


and another arcuate line


132


. Adjacent to the base side of the hinge


121


there is a radius surface


124


defined between the arcuate line


128


and an arcuate line


126


. The arcuate line


126


defines the locus of tangency between the radius surface


124


and an adjacent shoulder surface


136


on the base


50


. The arcuate line


128


defines the locus of tangency between the radius surface


124


and the radius surface of the first hinge


121


. The arcuate line


132


defines the locus of tangency between the radius surface of the first hinge


121


and the adjacent portion of the web


100


.




In a preferred, contemplated commercial embodiment wherein the closure


40


is fabricated from polypropylene, the radius of the surface


124


is 0.01 inch, the radius of the upwardly facing inner surface of the hinge


121


(as viewed in

FIG. 4

) is 0.03 inch, and the thickness of the web


100


is 0.012 inch.




The second hinge


122


has a configuration generally identical to that of the first hinge


121


, except that the second hinge


122


, of course, is oriented in the opposite direction to connect the web


100


to the lid


70


. When the lid is fully opened (FIG.


7


), the inner surface of the second hinge


122


has a curved, radius surface defined between an arcuate line


128


A (

FIG. 4

) and an arcuate line


132


A (FIG.


4


). Along the lid side of the second hinge


122


there is radius surface


124


A (FIG.


4


). The radius surface


124


A is defined the between the arcuate line


128


A and an arcuate line


126


A.




The arcuate line


126


A defines the locus of tangency between the radius surface


124


A and an adjacent shoulder


136


A on the lid


70


. The arcuate line


128


A defines the locus of tangency between the radius surface


124


A and the adjacent radius surface of the second hinge


122


. The line


132


A defines the locus of tangency between the radius surface of the second hinge


122


and the adjacent portion of the web


100


.




The second hinge


122


preferably has the same configuration and dimensions as the first hinge


121


. Therefore, the radius of surface


124


A and the radius of the surface of the hinge


122


are equal to the radius of surface


124


and the radius of the surface of the first hinge


121


, respectively.




With reference to

FIG. 7

, when the lid


70


is fully open, the radius surface on the outside of each hinge


121


and


122


along the exterior of the web


100


is designated by the reference numeral


140


. In a preferred, contemplated commercial embodiment, the radius of the surface


140


is about 0.012 inch, but at the center of the hinge the radius is 0.010 inch and at each lateral edge the radius is 0.015 inch with the radius gradually increasing from the center to the two lateral edges.




The hinge structure


80


is accommodated in the closure base


50


by a notch


142


defined in the closure base skirt


52


(FIG.


5


). Similarly, the hinge structure


80


is accommodated in the closure lid


70


by a notch


144


in the closure lid skirt


82


(FIG.


5


).




Preferably, the web


100


is substantially symmetric about a centerline


135


(FIG.


4


). Another line


137


is perpendicular to the centerline


135


and passes through the centers of the closure base


50


and closure lid


70


. The distance between the centerline


135


and the intersection of the line


137


with the hinge


121


equals the distance between the centerline


135


and the intersection of the line


137


with the hinge


122


.




Typically, the maximum outside dimensions of the shoulder


86


on the closure base skirt


52


is about 0.01 inch greater than the corresponding maximum outside dimensions of the lid skirt


82


at the lid skirt confronting surface


84


. As a consequence, the midpoint of the hinge structure


80


along the line


137


is offset slightly toward the lid


70


compared to the point mid-way between the centers of the lid


70


and base


50


(on the intersection of line


137


).




The central portion web


100


of the hinge structure


80


is narrower than the two ends


102


. The widest part of the hinge structure


80


occurs at each end


102


. Preferably, the widths of the two ends


102


are equal. A major portion of the width of each end


102


is defined by a straight line segment


102


′ when the lid


70


is in the full open condition. The straight line segment


102


′ is symmetrically disposed relative to the longitudinal centerline


135


of the hinge structure


80


. At each end of the segment


102


′, the end of the first hinge


121


is defined by an edge


102


″, and the end of the second hinge


122


is defined by an edge


102


A″. The edges


102


″ and


102


A″ slant or curve slightly toward the centerline


137


of the closure, which centerline


137


passes through the centers of the closure base


50


and closure lid


70


.




Each end of the radius surface


124


is defined by an edge


102


′″, and each end of the radius surface


124


A is defined by an edge


102


A′″. Each edge


102


′″ and


102


A′″ curves or slants from the edge


102


″ and


102


A″, respectively, so that the edges


102


′″ and


102


A′″ join the surfaces


136


and


136


A, respectively, at an orientation that is substantially parallel to the closure centerline


137


joining the centers of the closure base and lid. When the lid


70


is closed (FIG.


8


), the stress tends to cause a slight curvature of each end segment


102


′.




In the preferred embodiment illustrated in

FIGS. 1-8

, the shoulder


136


decreases in width from each end of the hinge structure


80


toward the middle of the hinge structure


80


where the width of the shoulder


136


becomes very small or, preferably, substantially disappears. This occurs because an abutment surface


150


(

FIG. 5

) is provided for controlling the position of the web


100


upon the closing or opening of the lid


70


. In the preferred embodiment illustrated, the abutment surface


150


is molded as a unitary part of the closure base


50


.




The abutment surface


150


projects outwardly from the closure base


50


. The closure base


50


has wall portions


157


(

FIGS. 4 and 5

) which each extends from one end of the notches


142


and merges with the abutment surface


150


. The closure base


50


also has a generally vertically oriented, arcuate surface


158


(

FIGS. 4 and 5

) which extends from the top surface of the shoulder


86


and beyond the top of the abutment surface


150


. The arcuate surface


158


extends around the periphery of the closure base deck


56


, and the peripheral shoulder


86


projects outwardly therefrom on either side of the abutment surface


150


.




In

FIG. 5

, arcuate line


155


defines an upper edge of a radius surface at the top of the surface


158


, and arcuate line


153


defines a lower edge of a radius surface at the top of the surface


158


.




The abutment surface


150


projects outwardly from the surface


158


as shown in

FIGS. 4

,


5


, and


7


. A horizontal ledge


162


is defined at the top of the abutment surface


150


and projects from the arcuate surface


158


. The outer edge of the ledge


162


is defined by a convex radius surface


164


(

FIG. 5

) which merges with the vertical abutment surface


150


. In a presently contemplated commercial embodiment, the surface


164


has a radius of about 0.01 inch.




The arcuate hinge


121


is spaced below the deck


56


, below the ledge


162


at the top of the abutment surface


150


, and below the closure base shoulder surface


86


.




In the region of the hinge structure


80


, the closure base notch


142


in the closure base wall


52


is defined along its bottom by the shoulder


136


(

FIGS. 4

,


5


, and


7


) which decreases in width toward the center of the hinge structure


80


. Adjacent the central portion of the hinge structure


80


, the width of the shoulder surface


136


decreases to nearly zero as the protruding abutment surface


150


projects further outwardly into the surface


136


.




The radius of the arcuate surface


158


(at the outer edge of the deck


56


adjacent the hinge structure


80


) is larger than the radius of the exterior, vertical surface of the abutment surface


150


. Moreover, both the inner and outer radii of the shoulder


136


are larger than the radius of the exterior, vertical surface of the abutment surface


150


.




The abutment surface


150


is defined by an arcuate surface which is preferably positioned symmetrically relative to the web ends


102


so that the surface


150


projects outwardly from the cylindrical surface


158


into the shoulder


136


. In the preferred illustrated embodiment, the abutment surface


150


, at the centerline


137


of the hinge structure


80


, may be characterized as extending both (1) upwardly to an elevation above the base shoulder surface


86


, and (2) downwardly along a vertical line to the shoulder


136


slightly below the first hinge


121


.




The ledge


162


at the top of the abutment surface


150


is recessed below the upper surface of the base deck


56


. The elevation of the abutment ledge


162


is established so that when the lid


70


is closed, the lid shoulder surface


136


A (

FIGS. 4 and 5

) will not interfere with the abutment surface ledge


162


.




The abutment surface


150


establishes a vertically oriented abutment beyond which the hinge web


100


cannot move when the lid


70


is closed and opened. The abutment surface


150


controls the position of the hinge structure web


100


upon the closing and opening of the lid


70


. Preferably, the abutment surface


150


has a vertical height, at the location along the center of the hinge structure


80


(on the centerline


137


of the centers of the closure base


50


and lid


70


), which is at or above the second hinge


122


when the lid


70


is fully closed. In other words, at the longitudinal center of the hinge structure


80


(on centerline


137


), the abutment surface


150


extends upwardly above hinge


121


for a distance that is greater than the shortest distance between the hinges


121


and


122


.




Upon the closing or opening of the lid


70


, the hinge structure web


100


engages the abutment surface


150


so that the position of the web


100


is controlled as described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,642,824. In general, the web


100


bows inwardly toward and against the abutment surface


150


when the lid


70


is partially closed. The abutment surface


150


should preferably extend adjacent the web central portion


100


from the first hinge


121


toward the second hinge


122


(when the lid is closed) more than one-half the shortest distance between the hinges (as measured at the centerline


137


between the web ends


102


). However, preferably, the abutment surface


150


at the centerline


137


of the hinge structure


80


extends all the way to, and slightly beyond, the hinge


122


when the lid


70


is closed, and this is presently believed to provide the most accurate control.




The radial extent of the projecting abutment surface


150


can be easily varied during manufacturing according to the hinge characteristics that are desired for a particular application. If the abutment surface


150


projects outwardly a considerable amount, then the hinge structure web


100


contacts the abutment surface


150


earlier during the closing process. If the projection of the abutment surface


150


is less, then the hinge structure web


100


would contact the abutment surface


150


later in the closing process, or only when the lid is substantially 100 percent closed.




When the abutment surface


150


projects further outwardly, the biasing action of the hinge structure


80


can be made greater to provide an opening and closing action with more “snap” or force. When the projection of the abutment surface


150


is reduced, the biasing force can be made less, and the opening and closing action of the closure will be “softer.” Further, when the abutment surface


150


projects further outwardly, the full open position of the lid


70


defines a greater opening angle relative to the closure base


50


than if the abutment surface


150


projects outwardly a lesser amount.




In a presently contemplated commercial embodiment, the radius of the abutment surface


150


is 0.553 inch and the diameter of the arcuate surface


158


from which it projects is about 1.320 inch. The height of the abutment surface


150


(at the ledge surface


162


) is 0.03 inch from the molding parting plane


177


(

FIG. 7

) defined by the inner surface of the hinge web


100


when the lid is in the as-molded, fully opened position. In contrast, in the contemplated commercial embodiment, when the lid


70


is in the closed position, the lowest part of the second hinge


122


(at the centerline


137


between the hinge web ends


102


) would be 0.005 inch lower than the abutment surface ledge


162


. Thus, the abutment surface


150


extends upward slightly beyond the lowest point of the lid hinge


122


when the lid


70


is closed.




The incorporation of the abutment surface


150


in the hinge structure


80


of the present invention is not a necessary part of the present invention. The hinge structure of the present invention may be employed with other hinge structures that do not employ the abutment surface


150


and/or that employ a fixed center hinge pivot between the two spaced-apart hinges


121


and


122


.




Generally, in a presently contemplated commercial embodiment, it is desired to provide a hinge structure


80


in which the strain in the hinge structure


80


is not too much when the lid


70


is in the fully closed position. This minimizes the tendency of the hinge structure


80


to loose its snap-action biasing capability when the lid


70


is maintained closed for long periods of time in the fully closed position.




In alternate designs wherein the hinge structure


80


would have a greater amount of strain when the lid


70


is in the fully closed position, the strain could, over time, result in some creep of the closure material and subsequent relaxation. This would reduce the amount of biasing force that the hinge structure would exert during opening and closing of the lid.




The operation of the hinge structure


80


, in so far as the structure has been described herein, is described in detail in the U.S. Pat. No. 5,642,824. Generally, as the hinge structure


80


is moved from the opened to the closed position, and vice versa, the changes in the distance between the hinges


121


and


122


near the ends


102


relative to the smaller changes in the distance between the hinges


121


and


122


at the centerline


137


create a significant tension force or “stretch” at the outer most ends


102


. This causes the hinge structure


80


to be unstable in any position between the full open and full closed positions.




This results in the hinge structure


80


having an inherent bias (when the lid is between the full open and full closed positions). This urges the hinge structure


80


to assume one of the two bistable positions (either full open or full closed).




The stretch or tension in the hinge structure


80


serves to create a temporary deformation within the hinge structure that is sufficient to move the lid


70


automatically toward the closed position or toward the open position when it is released from any position between the full open and full closed positions. The lid will automatically move to the full closed position if it is released while it is initially closer to the full closed position. On the other hand, the lid will automatically move to the full open position if the lid is released from an initial position which is closer to the full open position.




It will be appreciated that the full open orientation of the closure illustrated of the figures corresponds to the initial, as-molded position. This as-molded position preferably has the base and lid opened 180°. Once the lid


70


is first closed and the lid is thereafter opened and maintained free of any exterior forces, the hinge structure will typically maintain the lid in an open position which has an opening angle somewhat less than the substantially 180° opening angle of the original, as-molded, open orientation.




According to the present invention, the hinge structure


80


is configured to provide a selected stress or particular distribution of stress along the outer, lateral edges


102


of the web


100


. In particular, it has been found that the reduction of the web thickness at the regions


200


increases the stress at the midpoint of, and along, each lateral edge


102


adjacent to the region


200


. This causes a reduction in stress where the edges


102


connect to the closure body


50


and closure lid


70


. It is in these connection locations where failure or fracture of the hinge structure


80


is most likely to initiate. Thus, a reduction in the stresses at these four points of the hinge structure


80


will reduce the likelihood of the failure of the hinge structure


80


.




In one presently contemplated embodiment of the structure


80


, the web


100


includes two spaced-apart regions


200


(

FIGS. 4-7

) which define a reduced thickness in the web between, and relative to, the hinges


121


and


122


.




Preferably, each region


200


extends laterally to the adjacent lateral edge


102


.




In a presently preferred embodiment, the web


100


has a generally uniform thickness between the hinges


121


and


122


, and each region


200


of reduced thickness results in a reduction of the web thickness of about one third.




In the preferred embodiment illustrated in

FIGS. 1-7

, the web


100


may be characterized as having (1) an inside surface facing toward the closure base and lid (when the lid is in the closed position), and (2) an outside surface oppositely facing from the inside surface, and each reduced thickness region


200


is defined on the web inside surface by a generally trapezoid shaped recess having one side along one of the lateral edges


102


. The depth of the recess in the illustrated preferred embodiment is about one third of the thickness of the adjacent, uniform thickness portion of the web


100


. It is contemplated that in a polypropylene hinge structure where the generally uniform thickness portion of the web has a thickness between about 0.010 inch and 0.015 inch, and preferably about 0.012 inch, the preferred range of the thickness of the reduced thickness part of the web is at least about ½ or more of the thickness of the adjacent, uniform thickness portion of the web.




As can be seen in

FIG. 6

, each trapezoid shaped recess at each region


200


includes two sides which are each parallel to an adjacent hinge


121


or


122


, and each of those sides includes a lower arcuate surface


202


, an intermediate straight surface


204


, and an upper arcuate surface


206


. The lower arcuate surface


202


merges on one side with a generally planar bottom surface defining the bottom of the recess and merges on the other side with the straight surface


204


. The upper, arcuate surface


206


merges on one side with the straight surface


204


and on the other side with the upper, exposed, inside surface of the web


100


as shown in FIG.


6


.




As shown in

FIG. 6

, the width of the reduced thickness region


200


is defined on one end by a side which is generally parallel to the web lateral edge


102


, and that end is defined by a bottom, arcuate surface


222


, by an intermediate straight surface


224


, and by an upper arcuate surface


226


. The bottom arcuate surface


224


merges on one side with the planar bottom wall


208


of the reduced thickness region


200


and merges on the other side with the straight surface


224


. The upper, arcuate surface


226


merges on one side with the straight surface


224


and on the other side with the exposed, upwardly facing, inner surface of the web


100


. The curved surfaces


202


,


206


,


222


, and


226


function to reduce stress concentrations within the web at the bottom and top edges of the recess inwardly of the web lateral edge


102


.




However, the actual stress at the midpoint of the length of the web lateral edge


102


adjacent to the reduced thickness region


200


is greater than the stress at the midpoint of the web edge in a prior art hinge web (e.g., as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,642,824) which has either a substantially uniform thickness or an increased thickness along the edge between the hinges. The stress along the lateral edge


102


of the web


100


is greatest at the midpoint of the length of the lateral edge


102


, and the stress decreases outwardly from the center portion of the lateral edge


102


toward the hinges


121


and


122


. The greater stress at the center of each lateral edge


102


reduces the stresses where the web


100


connects with the hinges


121


and


122


at both of the lateral edges


102


. The stress reductions at these four points on the hinge structure minimize the likelihood of hinge failure initiating at these points.




A second embodiment of a hinge structure


80


A is shown in

FIG. 9

as incorporated in a closure having a closure base


50


A and a lid


70


A. The hinge structure


80


A includes a web


100


A joined to the closure base


50


A with a hinge


121


A and joined to the closure lid


70


A with a hinge


122


A. In the second embodiment of the hinge structure


80


A, the web


100


A includes a first region


200


A of reduced thickness on one side of the web and a second region


200


A′ on the other side of the web


100


A. Each region


200


A and


200


A′ preferably has the same configuration as the region


200


described above for the first embodiment with reference to

FIGS. 1-8

.





FIG. 10

illustrates a third embodiment of the hinge structure


80


B incorporated in a closure having a closure base


50


B and a closure lid


70


B. The hinge structure


80


B includes a web


100


B joined on one side with a hinge


121


B to the closure base


50


B and joined on the other side to the closure lid


70


B with a hinge


122


B. The hinge structure


80


B is substantially identical with the second embodiment of the hinge structure


80


A described above with reference to

FIG. 9

except that the third embodiment of the hinge structure


80


B does not include the upper reduced thickness region


200


A. The third embodiment of the hinge structure


80


B only includes a bottom recess or reduced thickness region


200


B which preferably has the same configuration as the recess


200


A′ described above with reference to the second embodiment of the hinge structure


80


A illustrated in FIG.


9


.




In still other embodiments (not illustrated), the hinge structure may include a fixed, central axis and two spaced-apart triangular shaped webs.




Each web is located at an end of the axis and is oriented with an apex of the web at the axis end. Each web has a lateral edge opposite the apex at the fixed axis, and each web has a reduced thickness region adjacent the lateral edge.




It will be appreciated that the shapes of the reduced thickness regions (such as regions


200


in the first embodiment of the hinge structure illustrated in

FIGS. 1-8

) may be altered to provide varying degrees of effect on producing a more uniform distribution of stress along each lateral edge of the hinge web. Thus, this permits control of the amount of stress reduction at the four regions in the hinge structure where the lateral edges of the web are connected to hinges. The stress reduction is of particular importance in any condition of the hinge structure wherein the hinge structure is subjected to stress during normal operation, such as when the hinge structure is moved away from its initially, as-molded, condition.




Typically, the hinge structure is initially molded in a fully opened condition. That is, when such a hinge structure is initially molded as part of a closure, the closure is molded with the lid in an initially open condition. After molding, the closure hinge structure is substantially stress-free. Stresses are developed within the hinge structure when the hinge structure is moved away from its initially molded, open condition (e.g., when the closure lid is moved away from the open condition toward the closed condition. The stress in the hinge structure reaches a maximum at the “over center” point (i.e., at an intermediate position between the closed and opened positions). The stress in the closure hinge structure is reduced somewhat when the lid has been moved to the fully closed position, but the hinge structure remains under sufficient stress to bias the lid to, and hold the lid at, the closed position. It is during the movement of the closure lid away from the fully opened condition toward the closed condition that the increased stresses can cause failure of the hinge. Because the present invention reduces the hinge operational stresses at the four regions of the hinge web corners at the two hinges, the hinge structure can be designed to accommodate many cycles of opening and closing without failure and/or can be designed with less material and/or with less expensive, but lower strength, materials.




It is seen that the present invention thus provides an improved hinge structure which is especially suitable for use in a closure which has a lid wherein it is desired that the lid operate with a snap-action motion while moving to and from a closed position.




The hinge structure protrudes minimally from the rear of the closure when the closure lid is in the closed position. This is compatible with high speed closure applying machinery employed in conventional container product filling lines. This permits the closure to be used with containers processed at high line speeds.




It will be appreciated that a closure incorporating the hinge structure of the present invention provides a system for covering an opening to a container with a closure having a base and lid connected with a multiple axis bistable hinge structure or with a single, fixed axis bistable hinge structure. The hinge structure can incorporate a web and an engaging abutment surface which can be designed to provide a small or large biasing force and a small or large lid opening angle.




It will also be appreciated that the closure may be provided with a variety of dispensing passage structures.




Further, a closure incorporating the hinge structure of the present invention need not be molded as a unitary article. The hinge structure could be molded as a separate element, and the lid and base could also be molded as separate pieces. The separate hinge structure could then be attached (e.g., by welding, adhesive, mechanical snap-fit, etc.) to the lid and base. The optional abutment surface, if employed, could be molded as part of the separate hinge structure element or it could be molded as part of the lid or base. However, if the abutment surface is molded as part of the lid or base while the web and hinges are molded together as an element separate from the lid and base, then the abutment surface may nevertheless still be characterized as being a functional, but separate, part of the hinge structure


per se


.




It will be readily observed from the foregoing detailed description of the invention and from the illustrations thereof that numerous other variations and modifications may be effected without departing from the true spirit and scope of the novel concepts or principles of this invention.



Claims
  • 1. A bistable, snap-action hinge structure for connecting two members, said hinge structure comprising:a continuous structure molded unitary with the two members to include (a) a web having a narrow portion and at least one wider end which defines a lateral edge, (b) a hinge that connects one of the members to said web along one side of said web, and (c) a hinge that connects the other of the members to said web along another side of said web, each said hinge bending to permit said web to move through a range of orientations relative to said member, said web having a reduced thickness region, said reduced thickness region extending to said lateral edge and having a reduced thickness at said lateral edge relative to the thickness of adjacent portions of said web at said lateral edges.
  • 2. The hinge structure in accordance with claim 1 in which a major portion of said web lateral edge is defined by a generally straight line segment when said hinge structure is fully opened.
  • 3. The hinge structure in accordance with claim 1 in which said reduced thickness is defined on one side surface of said web.
  • 4. The hinge structure in accordance with claim 1 in which said reduced thickness region is defined by a generally trapezoid shaped recess having one side along said lateral edge.
  • 5. The hinge structure in accordance with claim 1 in which said web has a substantially uniform thickness except for said reduced thickness region which has a reduced thickness which is at least about ½ or more of the thickness of the adjacent, uniform thickness portion of the web.
  • 6. A hinge structure for a closure for a container opening wherein said closure includes (1) a base for mounting to said container over said opening and defining a discharge aperture communicating with said opening, and (2) a lid movable between a closed position occluding said aperture and an open position spaced from said aperture, said hinge structure comprising:a bistable, snap-action hinge structure molded as a continuous structure unitary with the base and lid to include (a) a web having a central, narrow portion between two wider ends which each defines a lateral edge, (b) an arcuate hinge that connects said base to said web along one side of said web between said lateral edges, and (c) an arcuate hinge that connects said lid to said web along another side of said web between said lateral edges, each said hinge bending to permit said web to move through a range of orientations relative to said base and lid, said web having two spaced-apart reduced thickness regions, each said reduced thickness region extending to one of said lateral edges and having a reduced thickness at said lateral edge relative to the thickness of adjacent portions of said web at said lateral edges.
  • 7. The hinge structure in accordance with claim 6 in which said hinge structure includes at least one abutment surface located so that when said lid is in said closed position the abutment surface (1) extends adjacent said web central portion from one of said hinges toward the other hinge, and (2) contacts said web central portion whereby the position of said web is controlled upon the closing and opening of said lid.
  • 8. The hinge structure in accordance with claim 7 in whichsaid abutment surface is unitary with said base; said base has (1) a cylindrical surface with a first radius, and (2) a recessed shoulder projecting from said cylindrical surface adjacent said web ends for accommodating seating of said lid thereon when said lid is in said closed position; said abutment surface extends outwardly from said cylindrical surface adjacent said web central portion; and said abutment surface is defined by a cylindrical arc surface having a second radius less than said first radius.
  • 9. The hinge structure in accordance with claim 6 in which said closure is molded from one of the group of materials consisting of polypropylene and polyethylene.
  • 10. The hinge structure in accordance with claim 6 in which said base and lid each have an exterior wall which defines a notch for accommodating said web.
  • 11. The hinge structure in accordance with claim 6 in whicha major portion of each of said web lateral edges is defined by a generally straight line segment when said hinge structure is fully opened; and said straight line segments are generally parallel.
  • 12. The hinge structure in accordance with claim 6 in which the shortest distance between said two hinges is located along a line midway between said web end lateral edges.
  • 13. The hinge structure in accordance with claim 6 in whicheach said hinge, when the lid is in the open position, defines a radius surface; and said hinge structure includes an adjacent radius surface tangent to each said hinge radius surface.
  • 14. A hinge structure in accordance with claim 6 in which said web is free of apertures.
  • 15. The hinge structure in accordance with claim 6 in whichsaid web has an (1) inside surface facing toward said base and lid when said lid is in said closed position, and (2) outside surface oppositely facing from said inside surface; and each said reduced thickness region is defined on said web inside surface.
  • 16. The hinge structure in accordance with claim 15 in which each said reduced thickness region is defined by a generally trapezoid shaped recess having one side along one of said lateral edges.
  • 17. The hinge structure in accordance with claim 6 in which said web has a substantially uniform thickness except for said reduced thickness regions which each has a reduced thickness which is at least about ½ or more of the thickness of the adjacent, uniform thickness portion of the web.
US Referenced Citations (38)
Number Name Date Kind
1928445 Boyd Sep 1933
3110410 Pehr Nov 1963
3135456 Palazzolo Jun 1964
3629901 Wolf et al. Dec 1971
4403712 Wiesinger Sep 1983
4414705 Ostrowsky Nov 1983
4457458 Heinol Jul 1984
4545495 Kinsley Oct 1985
4573600 Dubach Mar 1986
4726091 Joyce Feb 1988
4778071 Fillmore Oct 1988
4793501 Beck Dec 1988
4813560 Begley Mar 1989
4854473 Dubach Aug 1989
5067624 Thanisch Nov 1991
5115931 Dubach May 1992
5143234 Lohrman et al. Sep 1992
5356017 Rohr et al. Oct 1994
5386918 Neveras et al. Feb 1995
5423442 Nozawa et al. Jun 1995
5435456 Dubach Jul 1995
5489035 Fuchs Feb 1996
5501348 Takeuchi Mar 1996
5531349 Wojcik Jul 1996
5540343 Schumacher Jul 1996
5558239 Dubach Sep 1996
5588546 Farside Dec 1996
5620107 Takeuchi Apr 1997
5632417 Robbins, III et al. May 1997
5642824 Hess, III et al. Jul 1997
5667094 Rapchack et al. Sep 1997
5755352 Wojcik et al. May 1998
5762216 Takeuchi Jun 1998
5785193 Kobayashi et al. Jul 1998
5865353 Baudin Feb 1999
5913435 Fuchs Jun 1999
6041477 Rentsch et al. Mar 2000
6152320 Hierzer et al. Nov 2000
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
GUM 1960247 Feb 1967 DE
42 39 299 A1 Mar 1994 DE
0 590 325 A2 Apr 1994 EP
0 631 942 A1 Jan 1995 EP
WO 9420713 Sep 1994 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Sketch A.
Sketch B.