This invention relates to a technique for simulating film grain in an image.
Motion picture films comprise silver-halide crystals dispersed in an emulsion, coated in thin layers on a film base. The exposure and development of these crystals form the photographic image consisting of discrete tiny particles of silver. In color negatives, the silver undergoes chemical removal after development and tiny blobs of dye occur on the sites where the silver crystals form. These small specks of dye are commonly called ‘grain’ in color film. Grain appears randomly distributed on the resulting image because of the random formation of silver crystals on the original emulsion. Within a uniformly exposed area, some crystals develop after exposure while others do not.
Grain varies in sizes and shapes. The faster the film, the larger the clumps of silver formed and blobs of dye generated, and the more they tend to group together in random patterns. The grain pattern is typically known as ‘granularity’. The naked eye cannot distinguish individual grains, which vary from 0.0002 mm to about 0.002 mm. Instead, the eye resolves groups of grains, referred to as blobs. A viewer identifies these groups of blobs as film grain. As the image resolution becomes larger, the perception of the film grain becomes higher. Film grain becomes clearly noticeable on cinema and high-definition images, whereas film grain progressively loses importance in SDTV and becomes imperceptible in smaller formats.
Motion picture film typically contains image-dependent noise resulting either from the physical process of exposure and development of the photographic film or from the subsequent editing of the images. The photographic film possesses a characteristic quasi-random pattern, or texture, resulting from physical granularity of the photographic emulsion. Alternatively, a similar pattern can be simulated over computed-generated images in order to blend them with photographic film. In both cases, this image-dependent noise is referred to as grain. Quite often, moderate grain texture presents a desirable feature in motion pictures. In some instances, the film grain provides visual cues that facilitate the correct perception of two-dimensional pictures. Film grain is often varied within a single film to provide various clues as to time reference, point of view, etc. Many other technical and artistic uses exist for controlling grain texture in the motion picture industry. Therefore, preserving the grainy appearance of images throughout image processing and delivery chain has become a requirement in the motion picture industry.
Several commercially available products have the capability of simulating film grain, often for blending a computer-generated object into a natural scene. Cineon® from Eastman Kodak Co, Rochester N.Y., one of the first digital film applications to implement grain simulation, produces very realistic results for many grain types. However, the Cineon® application does not yield good performance for many high-speed films because of the noticeable diagonal stripes the application produces for high grain size settings. Further, the Cineon® application fails to simulate grain with adequate fidelity when images are subject to previous processing, for example, such as when the images are copied or digitally processed.
Another commercial product that simulates film grain is Grain Surgery™ from Visual Infinity Inc., which is used as a plug-in of Adobe® After Effects®. The Grain Surgery™ product appears to generate synthetic grain by filtering a set of random numbers. This approach suffers from disadvantage of a high computational complexity.
None of these past schemes solves the problem of restoring film grain in compressed video. Film grain constitutes a high frequency quasi-random phenomenon that typically cannot undergo compression using conventional spatial and temporal methods that take advantage of redundancies in the video sequences. Attempts to process film-originated images using MPEG-2 or ITU-T Rec. H.264 ISO/IEC 14496-10 compression techniques usually either result in an unacceptably low degree of compression or complete loss of the grain texture.
Thus, there exists a need for a technique simulating film grain, especially a technique that affords relatively low complexity.
Briefly, in accordance with the present principles, there is provided a method for simulating a film grain pattern. The method begins by obtaining a set of bit-accurate transformed coefficients. The set of bit-accurate transformed coefficients then undergoes filtering. Thereafter, the filtered set of bit-accurate transformed coefficients undergoes a bit-accurate inverse transform to yield a film grain pattern.
To understand the technique of the present principles for creating a bit-accurate film grain pattern, a brief overview of film grain simulation will prove helpful.
The overall management of film grain requires the transmitter 10 (i.e., the encoder) provide information with respect to the film grain in the incoming video. In other words, the transmitter 10 “models” the film grain. Further the receiver 11 (i.e., decoder) simulates the film grain according to the film grain information received from the transmitter 10. The transmitter 10 enhances the quality of the compressed video by enabling the receiver 11 to simulate film grain in the video signal when difficulty exists in retaining the film grain during the video coding process.
In the illustrated embodiment of
A film grain modeler 16 accepts the input video stream, as well as the output signal of the film grain remover 14 (when present). Using such input information, the film grain modeler 16 establishes the film grain in the incoming video signal. In its simplest form, the film grain modeler 16 could comprise a look up table containing film grain models for different film stocks. Information in the incoming video signal would specify the particular film stock originally used to record the image prior to conversion into a video signal, thus allowing the film grain modeler 16 to select the appropriate film grain model for such film stock. Alternatively, the film grain modeler 16 could comprise a processor or dedicated logic circuit that would execute one or more algorithms to sample the incoming video and determine the film grain pattern that is present.
The receiver 11 typically includes a video decoder 18 that serves to decode the compressed video stream received from the transmitter 10. The structure of the decoder 18 will depend on the type of compression performed by the encoder 12 within the transmitter 10. Thus, for example, the use within the transmitter 10 of an encoder 12 that employs the ITU-T Rec. H.264|ISO/IEC 14496-10 video compression standard to compress outgoing video will dictate the need for an H.264-compliant decoder 18. Within the receiver 11, a film grain simulator 20 receives the film grain information from the film grain model 16. The film grain simulator 20 can take the form of a programmed processor, or dedicated logic circuit having the capability of simulating film grain for combination via a combiner 22 with the decoded video stream.
Film grain simulation aims to synthesize film grain samples that simulate the look of the original film content. As described, film grain modeling occurs at the transmitter 10 of
In accordance with the present principles, disclosed herein are several implementations of a method for creating a bit-accurate film grain pattern, such as for storage in a database for film grain simulation in HD DVD systems. Such a film grain pattern database enables film grain simulation in accordance with the parameters in a film grain Supplemental Enhancement Information (SEI) message according to the H.264|MPEG-4 AVC standard as discussed above. More specifically, devices and systems that implement the existing or future HD DVD specifications can employ such a film grain pattern database to store samples of different film grain types, each characterized by different frequency model parameters.
As discussed in detail below, the method of the present principles for creating a bit-accurate pattern of film grain makes use of a basic strategy that enables implementation in several different ways within the receiver 11. The basic strategy for creating a bit-accurate film grain pattern begins by establishing a set of integer transformed coefficients, typically, although not necessarily, Discrete Cosine Transformed (DCT) coefficients, typically N×N in size where N is an integer. The term “image” will some times refer to such a set of integer transformed coefficients. The step of establishing a set or image of integer transformed coefficients can occur in several different ways. For example, the establishing step could entail the processor or discrete logic circuitry in the receiver 11 of
The next step in the basic process of creating a bit-accurate film grain pattern entails frequency filtering the integer-transformed coefficients according to a desired film grain size and shape. For example, the frequency filtering could employ a predefined set of cut frequencies fHL, fVL, fHH, and fVH that represent cut-off frequencies (in two dimensions) of a filter that characterizes the desired film grain pattern. Following the frequency filtering, the integer transformed coefficients undergo an inverse transform to create the bit-accurate film grain pattern for subsequent storage in a database. In some instances, scaling could occur following the inverse transform of the coefficients.
In practice, the film grain pattern creation method of the present principles makes use of integer DCT and inverse DCT operations, thus assuring bit accuracy which proves useful for verification and testing purposes. However, different implementations of the basic strategy as described below do not necessarily afford bit accuracy between each other. Choosing a particular implementation will depend on the desired tradeoff between memory requirements and computational cost.
The image of Gaussian random values created during step 102 then undergoes a bit-accurate transform, typically by way of an integer Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) operation during step 104, although other bit-accurate transform techniques exist. The integer DCT coefficients established during step 102 then undergo frequency filtering during step 106. Typically, the frequency filter occurs using a predefined set of cut frequencies fHL, fVL, fHH, and fVH that represent cut-off frequencies (in two dimensions) of a filter that characterizes the desired film grain pattern. Next step 108 occurs during which the frequency filtered, transformed coefficients undergo an inverse bit-accurate transformation, typically, although not necessarily, an integer Inverse Discrete Cosine Transformation (IDCT), to yield a bit-accurate film grain pattern. Under some circumstances, scaling of the inversely transformed block of coefficient following step 108 will prove useful to vary the intensity of the bit-accurate film grain pattern.
Following step 108, step 110 occurs and the bit-accurate film grain that results from the integer IDCT transformation (and scaling if performed) undergoes storage in a database 111. Steps 102-110 undergo repeating during execution of the loop initiated during step 101. The loop continues for all possible film grain sizes and shapes, whereupon loop execution ends during step 112, after which the method ends during step 114.
To achieve bit accuracy, the method of
In addition to a bit-accurate Gaussian random number generator, a bit-accurate implementation of a Discrete Cosine Transform remains necessary to provide bit accuracy for the whole system. The illustrated embodiments described herein make use of an integer approximation of the DCT. The use of any integer approximation remains possible if the result obtained by the integer transformation lies reasonably close to the result obtained by the floating point DCT. This requirement ensures that the filtering performed in the transformed domain constitutes frequency filtering.
In the illustrated embodiment, an integer version of the DCT occurs by scaling the floating point version of the DCT. The N×N DCT matrix can be computed as:
where C(i,j) represents the coefficient of the transformation matrix at row j and column i. Then, the integer matrix is computed as:
where round(x) returns the nearest integer approximation of x, and the scaling_factor is a positive integer value. The value of the scaling factor determines the quality of the integer approximation of the DCT (the larger the scaling factor, the better the approximation) as well as the number of bits required to compute the transform (the smaller the scaling factor, the lesser bits are required).
Once the integer approximation of the DCT has been defined, the DCT transform is computed as follows:
B=((CintT*b*Cint)+2scaling
where CintT denotes the transposed version of the transformation matrix. Analogously, the inverse transform is computed as follows:
b=((Cint*B*CintT)+2scaling
In a particular embodiment where an 8×8 DCT is used, the integer approximation would be:
with scale factor equal to 16.
The image of Gaussian random values obtained during step 202 then undergoes a bit-accurate transform, typically by way of an integer Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) operation during step 204, although other bit-accurate transform techniques exist. The integer transformed coefficients established during step 202 then undergo frequency filtering during step 206. Typically, the frequency filter occurs using a predefined set of cut frequencies fHL, fVL, fHH, and fVH that represent cut-off frequencies (in two dimensions) of a filter that characterizes the desired film grain pattern. Next step 208 occurs during which the frequency filtered block of transformed coefficients undergoes an inverse bit-accurate transformation, typically, although not necessarily, an integer Inverse Discrete Cosine Transformation (IDCT), to yield a bit-accurate film grain pattern. Under some circumstances, scaling of the frequency filtered, inverse transformed block of coefficients will prove useful.
Thereafter, step 210 occurs and the film grain pattern resulting from the integer inverse transformation (and scaling if performed) undergoes storage in a database 211. The steps 202-210 within the loop initiated during step 201 undergo repeating for all possible film grain sizes and shapes, whereupon loop execution ends during step 212, after which the method ends during step 214. In this way, the database 211 stores a plurality of film grain patters for future use in simulating film grain in a video signal.
As compared to the method of
Steps 306-310 within the loop initiated during step 305 undergo for all possible film grain sizes and shapes, whereupon loop execution ends during step 312, after which the method ends during step 314. In this way, the database 311 stores film grain patterns for all sizes and shapes of film grain.
Following step 402, step 405 occurs which initiates entry into a loop that repeats for all possible film grain sizes and shapes. Step 406, the first step within the loop, initiates frequency filtering of the integer DCT coefficients obtained during step 402. Typically, the frequency filter occurs using a predefined set of cut frequencies fHL, fVL, fHH, and fVH that represent cut-off frequencies (in two dimensions) of a filter that characterizes the desired film grain pattern. Following step 406, the frequency filtered integer DCT coefficients undergo an inverse bit-accurate transformation, typically, although not necessarily, an integer Inverse Discrete Cosine Transformation (IDCT), during step 408 to yield a pattern of film grain. Under some circumstances, scaling of the inversely transformed block of coefficients following step 408 will prove useful. Thereafter, step 410 occurs and the film grain pattern resulting from the integer IDCT transformation (and scaling if performed) undergoes storage in a database 411.
Steps 406-410 within the loop initiated during step 405 undergo repeating for all possible film grain sizes and shapes, whereupon loop execution ends during step 412, after which the method ends during step 414. In this way, the database 411 stores film grain patterns for all sizes and shapes of film grain.
The method of
Following step 502, step 506 occurs during which the integer DCT coefficients undergo frequency filtering. Typically, the frequency filter occurs using a predefined set of cut frequencies fHL, fVL, fHH, and fVH that represent cut-off frequencies (in two dimensions) of a filter that characterizes the desired film grain pattern. Following step 506, the frequency filtered integer DCT coefficients undergo an inverse bit-accurate transformation, typically, although not necessarily, an integer Inverse Discrete Cosine Transformation (IDCT), to yield a block of film grain during step 508. Under some circumstances, scaling of the inversely transformed block of coefficient following step 508 will prove useful. Thereafter, step 510 occurs and the block of film grain that results from the integer IDCT transformation (and scaling if performed) undergoes storage in a database 511.
Steps 502-510 within the loop initiated during step 501 undergoes repeating for all possible film grain sizes and shapes, whereupon loop execution ends during step 512, after which the method ends during step 514. In this way, the database 511 stores film grain patterns for all sizes and shapes of film grain.
The implementation of film grain pattern creation described with respect to
The foregoing describes several different implementations of a technique for creating at least one, and preferably a plurality of film grain patterns for simulating film grain in a video signal.
This application claims the benefit, under 35 U.S.C. §365 of International Application PCT/US2005/038802 filed Oct. 26, 2005 which was published in accordance with PCT Article 21(2) on May 26, 2006 in English and which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application No.'s 60/628,837 filed Nov. 17, 2004.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2005/038802 | 10/26/2005 | WO | 00 | 5/11/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/055208 | 5/26/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4897775 | Kaassens | Jan 1990 | A |
4935816 | Faber | Jun 1990 | A |
4998167 | Jaqua | Mar 1991 | A |
5028280 | Ihara et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5140414 | Mowry | Aug 1992 | A |
5216556 | Steinberg et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5262248 | Ihara et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5285402 | Keith | Feb 1994 | A |
5285482 | Sehier et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5335013 | Faber | Aug 1994 | A |
5374954 | Mowry | Dec 1994 | A |
5406326 | Mowry | Apr 1995 | A |
5453840 | Parker et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5457491 | Mowry | Oct 1995 | A |
5461596 | Barrett | Oct 1995 | A |
5471572 | Buchner et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475425 | Przyborski et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5526446 | Adelson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5550815 | Cloonan et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5629769 | Cookingham et al. | May 1997 | A |
5641596 | Gray et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5659382 | Rybczynski | Aug 1997 | A |
5687011 | Mowry | Nov 1997 | A |
5706361 | Kent et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5709972 | Cookingham et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715008 | Sekiguchi et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5742892 | Chaddha | Apr 1998 | A |
5751398 | Beard | May 1998 | A |
5767860 | Zimmer et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5805782 | Foran | Sep 1998 | A |
5817447 | Yip | Oct 1998 | A |
5831673 | Przyborski et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845017 | Keyes | Dec 1998 | A |
5917609 | Breeuwer et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6067125 | May | May 2000 | A |
6134200 | Timmermans | Oct 2000 | A |
6216838 | Bacher | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219838 | Cherichetti et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233647 | Bentz et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6269180 | Sevigny | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285711 | Ratakonda et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6327304 | Miller et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6327391 | Ohnishi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6370192 | Pearlstein et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373992 | Nagao | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6441918 | Hori | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459699 | Kimura et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496221 | Wolf et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6559849 | Anderson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6587509 | Suzuki et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6650327 | Airey et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6665369 | Ukita | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667815 | Nagao | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6724942 | Arai | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728317 | Demos | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6744928 | Juri et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6839152 | Fan et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6868190 | Morton | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6963668 | Engeldrum et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6990251 | Edgar | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990252 | Shekter | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995793 | Albadawi et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7065255 | Chen et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7092016 | Morton et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7106907 | Lin et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7245783 | Fielding | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7286565 | Carr | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7362911 | Frank | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7596239 | Winger et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7630005 | Takei | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7653132 | Dang | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7664337 | Balram et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7738722 | Gomila et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742655 | Gomila et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7856055 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7958532 | Paul et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20010056568 | Hirotsu et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020003903 | Engeldrum et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016103 | Behnke | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020034337 | Shekter | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020133764 | Wang | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020154140 | Tazaki | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163657 | Bogdanowicz | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020171649 | Fogg | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030011615 | Tidwell | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031128 | Kim et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043922 | Kalker | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063778 | Rowe et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030068097 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030086623 | Berkner et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101453 | Matsuyama | May 2003 | A1 |
20030206231 | Chen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030206662 | Avinash | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218610 | Mech et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040013308 | Jeon et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040073926 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040101059 | Joch et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20060082649 | Gomila et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083316 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083426 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083429 | Joly | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060104366 | Huang et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060182183 | Winger | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060183275 | Schoner | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060256853 | Schlockermann et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060291557 | Tourapis | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070002947 | Lu et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070030996 | Winger et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036452 | Llach et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047658 | Tourapis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058866 | Boyce et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058878 | Gomilla et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070241 | Boyce et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070104380 | Gomila et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070117291 | Cooper et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070297515 | Gomila et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080252781 | DeWaele et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1530252 | Sep 2004 | CN |
0364285 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0622000 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0575006 | Dec 1993 | EP |
0622000 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1175091 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1215624 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1511320 | Mar 2005 | EP |
2312124 | Oct 1997 | GB |
1156069 | Jun 1989 | JP |
3187661 | Aug 1991 | JP |
4097681 | Mar 1992 | JP |
5252459 | Sep 1993 | JP |
8079765 | Mar 1996 | JP |
9062718 | Mar 1997 | JP |
9139940 | May 1997 | JP |
9247681 | Sep 1997 | JP |
10509297 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11 250246 | Sep 1999 | JP |
200041242 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2001357090 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2001357090 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2001357095 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002057719 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002374541 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003024326 | Jan 2003 | JP |
200324326 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003163853 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003179923 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2004120057 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004135169 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2005080301 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2007507172 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007521573 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007529945 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2073913 | Sep 1991 | RU |
2088962 | Aug 1997 | RU |
2139637 | Oct 1999 | RU |
2139637 | Jan 2001 | RU |
WO9314591 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9404960 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO9520292 | Jul 1995 | WO |
WO9710676 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO9722204 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO9841026 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO0018109 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO0146992 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0174064 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO0177871 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO0233958 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0251160 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 03005731 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO2004077348 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO2004095829 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO2004095829 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO2004104931 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO2005027045 | Mar 2005 | WO |
W02005032143 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005032143 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005039188 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2006022705 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO2006057703 | Jun 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Oktem et al., “Transform Domain Algorithm for Reducing Effect of Film-Grain Noise in Image Compression” Electrnonic Letters, Oct. 14, 1999, vol. 35, No. 21. |
Auto FX Software: Dreamsuite Series Two, Film Grain, http://web.archive.org/web/20040805085520/www.autofx.com/dreamsuite2/effect—pages/filmgrain.html, Aug. 5, 2004. |
“SEI message for film grain encoding: syntax and results”, Christina Gomila, Sep. 2-5, 2003. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,834 mailed Aug. 19, 2008. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,834 mailed Feb. 20, 2009. |
Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,834 mailed Jun. 16, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/569,318 mailed Aug. 15, 2008. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/569,318 mailed Feb. 13, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/569,318 mailed Jul. 31, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/572,820 mailed Jun. 1, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/571,148 mailed Apr. 15, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/575,676 mailed Dec. 15, 2008. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/575,676 mailed Mar. 13, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/246,848 mailed Jun. 26, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/252,177 mailed May 29, 2008. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/252,177 mailed Nov. 5, 2008. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/252,177 mailed Apr. 17, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/252,177 mailed Sep. 18, 2009. |
Al-Shaykh et al, “Lossy Compression of Images Corrupted by Film Grain Noise,” School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 1996 IEEE. |
Al-Shaykh et al. “Restoration of Lossy Compressed Noisy Images,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 8, No. 10, Oct. 1999. |
Al-Shaykh, “Lossy Compression of Noisy Images,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 7, No. 12, Dec. 1998. |
Brightwell et al., “Automated Correction of Film Unsteadiness, Dirt and Grain,” International Broadcasting Convention, Sep. 16-20, 1994, Conference Publication No. 397, IEE, 1994. |
Campisi et al, “Signal-Dependent Film Grain Noise Generation Using Homomorphic Adaptive Filtering,” IEE Proceedings, Image Signal Process, vol. 147, No. 3, Jun. 2000. |
Chao et al, “Constant Quality Rate Control for Streaming MPEG-4 Fgs. Video,” Integrated Media Systems Center and Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, 2000 IEEE. |
Chavel et al., “Film Grain Noise in Partially Coherent Imaging,” Optical Engineering, vol. 19, No. 3, May-Jun. 1980. |
Fischer et al, “Image Sharpening Using Permutation Weighted Medians,” Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Delaware, fischer@ee.udel.edu, paredesj@ee.udel.edu, arce@ee.udel.edu. |
Gomila, “SEI Message for Film Grain Encoding,” XP-002308742, Joint Video Team (JVT) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG, Document: JVT-H022, 8th Meeting, May 23-27, 2003, Geneva, CH. |
Illingworth et al, “Vision, Image and Signal Processing,” The Institution of Electrical Engineers, IEE Proceedings, Jun. 2000, vol. 147, No. 3. |
McLean et al, “Telecine Noise Reduction,” XP-002285972, 2001 The Institute of Electrical Engineers. |
Oktem et al, “Transform Domain Algorithm for Reducing Effect of Film-Grain Noise in Image Compression,” Electronics Letters, Oct. 14, 1999, vol. 35, No. 21. |
Peng et al, “Adaptive Frequency Weighting for Fine-Granularity-Scalability,” Visual Communications and Image Processing 2002, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4671, 2002 SPIE 0277-786X/02. |
Prades-Nebot et al, “Rate Control for Fully Fine-Grained Scalable Video Coders,” Visual Communications and Image Processing 2002, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4671 (2002), SPIE 0277-786X/02. |
Schaar et al, “Fine-Granularity-Scalability for Wireless Video and Scalable Storage,” Visual Communications and Image Processing 2002, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4671 (2002) SPIE 0277-786X/02. |
Shahnaz et al, “Image Compression in Signal-Dependent Noise,” Applied Optics, vol. 38, No. 26, Sep. 10, 1999. |
Yan et al, “Efficient Video Coding with Hybrid Spatial and Fine-Grain SNR Scalabilities,” Department of Electronic Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, China. |
Yan et al, “Film Grain Noise Removal and Generation for Color Images,” Department Electrical and Computer Engineers, University of Toronto, dimitris@comm.toronto.edu. |
Yan et al, “Signal-Dependent Film Grain Noise Removal and Generation Based on Higher-Order Statistics,” University of Toronto, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, dimitris@comm.toronto.edu, 1997 IEEE. |
Yoshida, “Go with the Grain, Film R&D Chief Urges, for Art's Sake,” EE Times, Feb. 7, 2005. |
Zhang et al, “Constant Quality Constrained Rate Allocation for FGS Video Coded Bitstreams,” Visual Communications and Image Processing 2002, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4671 (2002) SPIE 0277-786X/02. |
International Search Report Dated Feb. 22, 2006. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/552,179 mailed Sep. 1, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,833 mailed May 10, 2010. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,833 mailed Oct. 20, 2010. |
Office Action ADV ACT from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,833 mailed Jan. 7, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,833 mailed Feb. 15, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,833 mailed May 10, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/556,833 mailed Sep. 30, 2011. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/571,148 mailed May 12, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/571,148 mailed Sep. 10, 2010. |
Office Action ADV ACTION from U.S. Appl. No. 10/572,820 mailed Mar. 19, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/572,820 mailed May 11, 2010. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/572,820 mailed Sep. 30, 2010. |
Office Action ADV ACTION from U.S. Appl. No. 10/575,676 mailed Jun. 7, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/575,676 mailed Jul. 19, 2011. |
Finala Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/575,676 mailed Oct. 26, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/581,151 mailed Jan. 20, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/246,474 mailed Sep. 1, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/246,848 mailed Jul. 6, 2010. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/246,848 mailed Oct. 13, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,070 mailed Jul. 21, 2010. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,070 mailed Nov. 12, 2010. |
Office Action ADV ACTION from U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,070 mailed Jan. 11, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,070 mailed Jun. 22, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/273,067 mailed Aug. 4, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,581 mailed Jun. 8, 2011. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,581 mailed Oct. 14, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,816 mailed Sep. 15, 2011. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,816 mailed Dec. 5, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/667,846 mailed Oct. 4, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/284,378 mailed Dec. 22, 2010. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/285,540 mailed Nov. 23, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/285,540 mailed Mar. 30, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/589,217 mailed Jul. 13, 2010. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/589,217 mailed Oct. 28, 2010. |
Office Action ADV ACTION from U.S. Appl. No. 12/589,217 mailed Dec. 2, 2010. |
Byun et al: Power Efficient MPEG-4 Decoder Featuring Low-Complexity Error Resilience, ASIC, 2002 Proceedings IEEE Asia Pacific Conference Aug. 6-8, 2002 Piscataway, NJ USA IEEE. |
Conklin et al: “Dithering 5-Tap Filter for Inloop Deblocking,” JVT of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG, 3rd Meeting, Fairfax, VA May 6-10, 2002, pp. 1016. |
Gomila et al: “Film Grain Modeling vs. Encoding”, JVT of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG 11th Meeting, Munich, DE, Mar. 15-19, 2004. |
Naderi et al: “Estimation of Images Degraded by Film Grain Noise”, Applied Optics, vol. 17, Issue 8, pp. 1223-1237, Jan. 1, 1978. |
Pirsch et al: “VLSI Architures for Video Compression—A Survey”, Proceedings of IEEE, New York, USA, vol. 83, No. 2, Feb. 1, 1995, pp. 220-246. |
Puri et al: “Video Coding Using the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC Compression Standard”, Signal Processing Image Communication, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 19, No. 9. Oct. 1, 2004, pp. 7993-7894. |
Takashi et al: “a 60-Mw MPEG-4 Video Codec Using Clustered Voltage Scaling w/Variable Supply Voltage Scheme”, IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, Piscataway, NJ, Nov. 1998,v.33 #11. |
Naderi et al., “Estimation of Images Degraded by Film-Grain Noise”, 1978 Optical Society of America, 1978, pp. 1228-1237. |
Byun et al., “Power Efficient MPEG-4 Decoder Architecture Featuring Low-Complexity Error Resilience”, 2000 IEEE. |
Pirsch et al., “VLSI Architectures for Video Compression—A Survey”, Proceedings ofthe IEEE, vol. 83, No. 2, Feb. 1995. |
Conklin et al., “Dithering 5-Tap Filter for Inloop Deblocking”, JVT of ISO/IEC PEG & ITU-T VCEG, Document: JVT-C056, 3rd eeting: Fairfax, VA, May 6-10, 2002. |
Bjontegaard—“Addition—of—comfort—noise—as—post—processing”: ITU Telecommunications Standarization Sector, Sunriver, Oregon, Sep. 8, 1997. pp. 102. |
Lerner—“Fixed—vs.—floating—point: A—surprisingly—hard—choice”. eetimes, Feb. 6, 2007. pp. 1-4. |
McMahon—EtAl—“High—Quality—SD—and—HD—AVC—Test—Results”. Joint Video Team (JVT of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG) Geneva, Switzerland. Oct. 9, 2002. |
Schlockerman—EtAl: “Film Grain—coding—in—H.264/AVC”; JVT (JVT of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG); 9th Meeting, San Diego, California Sep. 2, 2003. |
Wiegand—EtAl—“Overview—of—the—H.264/AVC—Video—Coding—Standard” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 13, No. 7. Jul. 2003. |
Sullivan—EtAl—“The H.264/AVC advanced—video—coding—standard:—Overview—and—Introduction—to—the—Fidelity—Range—Extensions”. Proceedings of SPIE 5558 App of Digital Image Processing XXVII, Nov. 2, 2004. |
Schlockerman—EtAl: “Film—Grain—coding—in—H.264/AVC”; JVT (JVT on of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG); 9th Meeting, San Diego, California Sep. 2, 2003. |
Sullivan—EtAl—“The—H.264/AVC—advanced—video—coding—standard:—Overview—and—Introduction—to—the—Fidelity—Range—Extensions”. Proceedings of SPIE 5558 App of Digital Image Processing XXVII, Nov. 2, 2004. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070269125 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60628837 | Nov 2004 | US |