This invention relates to black generation techniques in CMYK color printers. Such printers lay down four kind of inks, or colorants: cyan (C), magenta (M), yellow (Y), and black (K), where black is used to enhance the shadow details of the printed images.
In general, cyan, magenta, and yellow inks, or colorants, cannot produce a high quality black image when combined. To enhance the shadow details of printed images, and to save non-black colorants, a fourth color, black (K), also referred to herein as “key,” is used. However, with the addition of black, many colors may be produced by using multiple sets of C, M, Y and K. The goal, therefore, is to find a way to optimally use C, M, Y and K.
The prior art teaches two primary approaches for achieving this goal. one approach is to use a black generation curve and three under color removal (UCR) curves. An example of such a set of curves is shown generally at 20 in
Ci=1.0−R, M1=1.0−G, and Y1=1.0−B, (1)
where RGB and CMY values are normalized to the range between 0.0 and 1.0. The minimum of these initial CMY values, k1=min(C1, Mi, Yi), is used as the index to the 1-D LUT for the black generation curve, BG(k), to obtain the output K amount, as shown in Eq. 2:
K=BG(ki). (2)
With the addition of K, the output CMY colorants should be appropriately reduced to produce the desired color. This is accomplished by using the three UCR curves for C, M, and Y, respectively, as shown in Eq. 3:
C=Ci−UCRC(k1), M=Mi−UCRM(k1), and Y=Y1−UCRY(k1). (3)
The black generation and UCR curves are experimentally obtained for different printing processes. This basic approach, however, is not flexible enough to fully utilize the printer color gamut resulting from the addition of the K colorant.
Another approach is to use interpolation between the maximum black CMYK and the minimum black CMYK to obtain a desired CMYK. For any given color, i.e., a CIELAB value, there is a range of K values that is possible in the CMYK combination of colorants to produce that color. The lower limit is referred to as Kmin, and the upper limit is referred to a Kmax. A value of K is chosen between these limits, which allows black usage to change throughout the tone scale and color space. A flow chart for this approach is shown in
The traditional UCR type of black generation technique is well known in the art. It is discussed in J. A. C. Yule, Principles of Color Reproduction, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1967. It is also implemented in the PostScript® Language by Adobe Systems Inc., which is described in PostScript® Language Reference Manual, Second Edition, 1990. The newer method of interpolating between CMYK values with maximum and minimum K is discussed in M. Tsukada, et al., New Algorithm for UCR Using Direct Color Mapping, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 2413, pp. 365–374, February 1995; and R. Holub et al., The Black Printer, Journal of Imaging Technology, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 149–158, August 1989.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,482,917 to Gaulke et al., for Method for a Reproduction of Colored Masters in Four-Color Printing Using Color Reduction, granted Nov. 13, 1984, describes a method wherein the color gamut is divided into a gray and a chromatic region. Different UCR curves are used for the gray and chromatic regions. For colors on the boundary dividing the gray and chromatic regions, CMYK values obtained using both curves are combined to produce a single set of CMYK values for that color.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,551,751, to Jung, for Color Reduction Dependent on Tone, granted Nov. 5, 1985; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,590,515, to Wellendorf for Method and Apparatus for Modifying Color Reduction Depending on Tone, granted May 20, 1986, both describe the use of different UCR curves for image areas with different tone characteristics.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,172,223, to A. Suzuki, et al., for Method of Processing a Color Image to Obtain Color and Black Reproduction Signals, granted Dec. 15, 1992, describes the use of quadratic functions as the UCR curves. In addition to applying the UCR curves, a 3×3 matrix is also used to convert the input CMY values to the output CMY values.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,268,754 to Van de Capelle, et al., for Method and a Device for Converting a Color Coordinate Set, granted Dec. 7, 1993, describes a general strategy to convert signals in an n-dimensional color space to an m-dimensional color space. The case of m=4 is applicable to generating CMYK signals for four-color printers. Rather complex methods involving gradients are described. For methods specific to CMYK printers, only the basic UCR type of techniques is discussed.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,305,119, to R. J. Rolleston et al., for Color Printer Calibration Architecture, granted Apr. 19, 1994, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,528,386, granted Jun. 18, 1996, to R. J. Rolleston, et al., for Color Printer Calibration Architecture, describe a general CMYK printer color table generation process. Black generation using a UCR method is discussed as part of the overall printer calibration system. The traditional UCR method is used.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,402,253 to Seki, for Color Conversion Method and Apparatus with a Variable Gray Component Replacement Ratio, granted Mar. 28, 1995, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,502,579 to Kita, et al., for Color Image Processing Method and Apparatus Capable of Adjusting the UCR Ratio, granted Mar. 26, 1996, describe the use of device independent color values such as the CIELAB and LCH values to modify the black generation and UCR curves.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,425,134 to Ishida, for Print Color Material Amount Determining Method, granted Jun. 13, 1995, describes a method wherein a range of all the CMYK colorants that can produce a desired color is first obtained. A complex algorithm is then used to determine the common range of CMYK values which produce all of the desired colors. The final CMYK colorants for a particular color are selected from the common range.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,508,827 to Po-Chien, for Color Separation Processing Method and Apparatus for a Four Color Printer Using Color Solid Corresponding to Tristimulus Values, granted Apr. 16, 1996, describes the determination of CMYK values with maximum and minimum possible K. Then linear interpolation is used to obtain the final CMYK values based on the desired K amount.
U S. Pat. No. 5,553,199 to Spaulding, et al., for Method and Apparatus for Calibrating a Four Color Printer, granted Sep. 3, 1996, describes the development of a maximum K strategy and a minimum K strategy. The strategies are implemented by 3-D interpolations. For input CMY values, the maximum and minimum K strategies are used to generate two CMYK sets. Then a parameter indicating the desired K amount is used to interpolate these two CMYK sets to obtain the final CMYK values.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,710,824 to Mongeon, for System to Improve Printer Gamut, granted Jan. 20, 1998, describes the use of both the maximum and minimum input CMY values to control the K usage. A non-linear function is used to control the K addition based on the primary colorant amount.
A method of determining colorant amounts to be laid down in a color printer includes determining an initial set of cyan, magenta and yellow (CMY) values; ordering the initial set of CMY values to determine the largest, middle and smallest values of the three values and generating an ordering vector; selecting a gamut center black generation LUT and two gamut boundary black generation LUTs from a set of black generation LUTs; indexing the selected black generation LUTs to determine black values for each black generation LUT as a function of the minimum of the CMY values; interpolating the final output black colorant amount from the black values; and interpolating the final output CMY colorant amounts from the initial set of CMY values, the maximum CMY ink limit constraint, and a set of boundary threshold values.
An object of the invention is to provide a method wherein interpolation over the entire printer input color gamut is used to control the amount of C, M, Y, and K to be printed.
Another object of the invention is to provide a method wherein the final CMYK amount is obtained by interpolation based on black generation curves.
A further object of the invention is to provide procedures for optimally generating black generation curves to maximize the printing gamut.
Another object of the invention is to automatically control black usage by the black generation curves inside and on the boundary of the printer input color gamut.
This summary and objectives of the invention are provided to enable quick comprehension of the nature of the invention. A more thorough understanding of the invention may be obtained by reference to the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the invention in connection with the drawings.
a–f depict the tetrahedra which define regions for color gamut interpolation.
There are three subtractive primaries usually used in printing devices Cyan, Magenta and Yellow. All hues can be generated by these colorants, but additional colorants may be used to extend the color gamut beyond that of use of CMY only. The most common colorant used is black.
This disclosure considers a CMYK printer. The term “printer input color gamut” refers to the CMY primaries and the term “printer output color gamut” refers to the set of colors obtainable using black (K) colorant.
Adding K to CMY lowers the L* value of the resulting color, so some amount of CMY must be removed. The term undercolor removal (UCR) defines the reduction of CMY amounts along a neutral scale, while the term gray component replacement (GCR) defines the reduction of CMY amounts throughout the entire gamut of the printer. There are other schemes used to increase gamut in select areas, and one of these is referred to as undercolor addition (UCA). UCA is the addition of K in the darkest areas of the images and adds detail in the shadow regions.
Put another way, the typical GCR/UCR strategy is to define X=min(C, M, Y) and have K=f(X). Then C′=C−g(X), etc., where f and g are functions that are addressed in this disclosure, and are designed for optimizing the attributes of gamut, ink usage, neutral consistency, granularity, etc. This disclosure focuses on a form of GCR.
The invention generates a black, or key, colorant for CMYK color printers to maximize the gamut of the printer. In general, cyan (C), magenta (M), and yellow (Y) colorants, or inks, when combined, cannot produce a true black, and produce only a dark brownish color. To enhance shadow details of a printed image, a fourth colorant, black (K), is used. With the addition of black, many colors may be produced by multiple sets of C, M, Y, and K This invention provides an optimal way to use CMY and K with the objective of maximizing the printer gamut, thereby using the best set of any multiple sets to produce a particular color.
This invention uses interpolation over the entire printer input color space to control the amount of C, M, Y, and K colorant applied in generating a desired color. For each color, similar to the aforementioned UCR-based methods, the invention begins with an initial set of CMY values, Ci, Mi and Yi, and then determines the final CMYK amounts. The minimum of this initial CMY amount is also used as one of the parameters to control the black generation.
An advantage of the invention is that in addition to a black generation LUT, used in the center of the printer input gamut, where Ci=Mi=Yi, referred to herein as the “gamut center black generation LUT,” multiple black generation LUTs are used on the boundary of the gamut, where max(Ci, Mi, Yi)=1.0, to control the final CMYK amount, referred to herein as the “gamut boundary black generation LUTs.” Put another way, at least one, and not more than two, of the Ci, Mi, Yi values=1.0, and at least one of the Ci, Mi, Yi values=zero. The gamut center black generation LUT and the gamut boundary black generation LUTs comprise what is referred to herein as a “black generation LUT set.” The final CMYK amount is obtained by interpolation based on the black generation LUT set. Specific procedures are described later herein for optimally generating the black generation LUT set to maximize the printer output gamut.
A system incorporating the method of the invention is depicted in
Algorithm Description
First, the method for obtaining output CMYK values on a center diagonal line 54, also referred to herein as a gamut center black generation curve, connecting “White” and “Black,” is described. In the initial CMY space, points on this line have equal CMY, Ci,=Mi=Yi, going from 0.0 (“White”) to 1.0 (“Black). These equal CMY values are denoted as CMYi, and will be used as the index to the black generation LUT, BG0, at center diagonal line 54, to obtain the desired K amount at the center diagonal:
K=BG0(CMYi). (4)
The output CMY values on center diagonal 54 are equal to one another, but they are scaled by the maximum output CMY amount, CMYmax. Therefore, the output C, M, or Y values will be:
CMY=CMY1*CMYmax. (5)
There is also a boundary black generation LUT, BGC, on a boundary line 56, also referred to herein as a gamut boundary black generation curve, connecting “C” to “Black.” On line 56, Ci,=1.0, and Mi=Yi goes from 0.0 at “C” to 1.0 at “Black.” The equal MY value is denoted as MY1, and is used as the index to look up the K amount from the boundary black generation LUT on the cyan-to-black boundary:
K=BGc(MYi). (6)
In order to maximize the output printer gamut, after the addition of K on the cyan-to-black boundary, the output M and Y amounts are set to zero, rather than being increased from 0.0 at “C” to 1.0 at “Black.” The reason for this is shown in
However, and now referring to
and
These output responses are also shown in
Referring again to
In the preferred embodiment of the invention, six boundary black generation LUTs are used on the boundary lines connecting “Black” to the six vertices on circumference 58. “C”, “G”, “Y”, “R”, “M”, and “B.” As shown in
k(C0)=BG0(vs), k(C1)=BG1(vs), and k(C2)=BG2(vs). (9)
The thresholds on lines B1A and B2A for the smooth transition of the output CMY values to the “Black” point are denoted as T1 and T2, respectively. The re-ordered output CMY values on C0 may be obtained with Eq. 5:
(v1(C0), v2(C0), v3(C0))=(vs, vs, vs)*CMYmax. (10)
The re-ordered output CMY values at C1 may be obtained by Eqs. 7 and 8 by recognizing that the C, M, and Y components in those equations should be replaced by the largest, middle, and smallest components, respectively:
Because the re-ordered input CMY vector at vertex B2 is (1.0, 1.0, 0.0), the re-ordered output CMY values on boundary line B2A should smoothly transition from (1.0, 1.0, 0.0) at B2 to (CMYmax, CMYmax, CMYmax) at A, or “Black.” Therefore, the reordered output CMY values at C2 may be written as:
By projecting the input point P along axis V2 on the plane perpendicular to axis V3, intersections D1 and D2 are obtained on lines C0C1 and C0C2, respectively. Using linear interpolation, the re-ordered output CMYK values on the intersection points may be obtained by:
(v1(D1), v2(D1), v3(D1), k(D1))=(1−w1)*(v1(C0), v2(C0), v3(C0), k(C0))+w1*(v1(C1), v2(C1), v3(C1), k(C1), (15)
and
(v1(D2), v2(D2), v3(D2), k(D2))=(1−w1)*(v1(C0), v2(C0), v3(C0), k(C0))+w1*(v1(C2), v2(C2), v3(C2), k(C2)), (16)
where the weighting factor w1 is given by:
The final re-ordered CMYK values at P are then interpolated from those on D1 and D2,
(v1, v2, v3, K)=(1−w2)*(v1(D1), v2(D1), v3(D1), k(D1))+w2*(v1(D2), v2(D2), v3(D2), k(D2)), (18)
where (v1, v2, v3) is the re-ordered output CMY vector and K is the output K value. The weighting factor w2 is given by:
A complete block diagram of the invention is shown in
The smallest of the input CMY values, vs, is also an input to block 96. It is used to index the selected black generation curves to obtain output K values at points C0, C1, and C2, as shown in Eq. 9. A “weight generator,” block 98 generates weighting factors w1 and w2 based on Eqs. 17 and 19. These weights are used in the “K Interpolator,” block 100 to obtain the final output K amount 101. The interpolation formulas are Eqs. 15, 16, and 18 for the K component. In the “CMY Interpolator,” block 102, boundary thresholds T1 and T2 are selected from block 104, based on Table 2.
The reordered CMY output values at points, C0, C1 and C2 are obtained by Eqs. 10–14. With the weighting factors from weight generator 98, the re-ordered output CMY values are obtained by Eqs 15, 16, and 18. Finally, the ordering information, V, is used to convert the reordered output CMY values into the correct output CMY values 106.
Design Parameters
The first design parameter to be determined is the maximum output K amount, Kmax. Ideally, color patches having maximum CMY amount (C=M=Y=1.0) and K changes from 0.0 to 1.0, would be printed, however, this is not a viable solution for most technologies. Color patches having known CMY values may be printed to form a base line. The L response of these color patches is measured. A typical L versus K plot is shown in
Next, the center black generation LUT, BG0, is designed. Referring now to
The intersections of curve 116 with the family of L versus CMY curves are shown as P1, P2, . . . Pn−1, Pn, in
BG0(CMY1)=BG0(s)(CMY1*CMYmax). (21)
The final step of the parameter design process of this invention is to design the boundary black generation LUTs and determine the boundary threshold values at the six boundary lines of the input CMY cube. The cyan-to-black boundary is used to illustrate how to design the LUT and determine the threshold. The same design procedure may be applied to other boundaries
a depicts the input cyan triangular plane, generally at 130, and its output gamut in the CIELAB space, generally at 140 in
As shown in
where LC is the L value of the pure cyan colorant.
To design the boundary black generation LUTs, the L versus equal CMY input at the center diagonal needs to be determined. Because the black generation LUT at the center diagonal, BG0, is already known, the output CMYK values on the center diagonal may be obtained by inputting equal CMY values to Eqs. 4 and 5. By printing out color patches with these output CMYK values and measuring their L values, the L versus CMY response may be obtained. This response is shown in Quadrant IV of
where KC is the threshold for the smooth transition of the output CMY values from C=1.0 and M=Y=0.0 on the cyan boundary to C=M=Y=CMYmax at the black point. This threshold is usually set to something between 0.1 to 0.2, or 10% to 20%, and is later converted to the threshold for the input M and Y values on the cyan boundary, TC. The L versus K response on the cyan boundary is the measured L values on these color patches plotted against the input K values as shown in Quadrant II of
After BGC is obtained, threshold KC is projected horizontally rightward to BGC and the corresponding value on the horizontal axis, TC, will be the threshold on the cyan-to-black boundary. Some approximation is used here. Because black generation curve BGC is not a straight line between the input range from TC to 1.0, the linear relationship in Eqs. 23 and 24 in terms of K will not translate into linear relationship in terms of min(Ci, Mi, Yi), which means that the piece-wise linear functions in Eqs. 7 and 8, and in 11 and 12, are only approximations. Because the output CMYK colors in this area of the gamut are dominated by K, such approximations will only minimally affect the appearance of the final output color. The procedure for obtaining BGC and TC on the cyan-to-black boundary may be used to obtain the black generation LUTs and thresholds on other boundaries. This procedure may also be summarized by Eqs. 25 and 26:
and
TN=BGN−1(KN), (26)
where N represents C, M, Y, R, G, or B and vs=min(Ci, Mi, Yi).
Thus, a method for CMYK color printer black generation using multiple lookup tables and interpolation has been disclosed. It will be appreciated that further variations and modifications thereof may be made within the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4275413 | Sakamoto et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4477833 | Clark et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4482917 | Gaulke et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4551751 | Jung | Nov 1985 | A |
4590515 | Wellendorf | May 1986 | A |
5172223 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5268754 | Van de Capelle et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5305119 | Rolleston et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5402253 | Seki | Mar 1995 | A |
5425134 | Ishida | Jun 1995 | A |
5438649 | Ruetz | Aug 1995 | A |
5502579 | Kita et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5508827 | Po-Chieh | Apr 1996 | A |
5528377 | Hutcheson | Jun 1996 | A |
5528386 | Rolleston et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5539540 | Spaulding et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5553199 | Spaulding et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5581376 | Harrington | Dec 1996 | A |
5710824 | Mongeon | Jan 1998 | A |
5768410 | Ohta et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5982990 | Gondek | Nov 1999 | A |
6466332 | Fukasawa | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6611356 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
20030020937 | Fukasawa | Jan 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020113982 A1 | Aug 2002 | US |