Genus and species: Rubus L. subgenus Rubus.
Variety denomination: ‘DrisBlackSixteen’.
The present invention relates to a new and distinct blackberry cultivar designated ‘DrisBlackSixteen’ and botanically known as Rubus L. subgenus Rubus. This new blackberry variety was discovered in Ventura County, Calif. in April 2009 and originated from a cross between the proprietary female parent blackberry plant ‘DrisBlackFive’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 24,701) and the proprietary male parent blackberry plant ‘BL481.2’ (unpatented). The original seedling of the new cultivar was first asexually propagated by tissue culture and root cuttings at a nursery in Santa Cruz County, Calif. in 2010. ‘DrisBlackSixteen’ was subsequently asexually propagated by tissue culture and root cuttings and underwent further testing at a nursery in Michoacan, Mexico, from 2011 to 2015. The present invention has been found to be stable and reproduce true to type through successive asexual propagations.
The following are the most outstanding and distinguishing characteristics of this new cultivar when grown under normal horticultural practices in Michoacan, Mexico.
This new blackberry plant is illustrated by the accompanying photographs which show the plant's canes, flowers, fruit, and leaves. The colors shown are as true as can be reasonably obtained by conventional photographic procedures. The photographs are of plants that are 2 years old.
The following descriptions of ‘DrisBlackSixteen’ are based on observations made in Michoacan, Mexico on 2-year old plants. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. ‘DrisBlackSixteen’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. Color terminology follows The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, London (R.H.S.) (2015 edition). Descriptive terminology is from the Plant Identification Terminology, An Illustrated Glossary 2nd edition, by James G. Harris and Melinda Woolf Harris, unless where otherwise defined.
‘DrisBlackSixteen’ differs from the proprietary female parent ‘DrisBlackFive’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 24,701) in that the fruit of ‘DrisBlackSixteen’ is firm with strong glossiness, whereas the fruit of ‘DrisBlackFive’ is very firm with medium glossiness. Additionally, the leaves of ‘DrisBlackSixteen’ are palmate shaped with medium glossiness, while the leaves of ‘DrisBlackFive’ are odd-pinnate shaped with weak glossiness.
‘DrisBlackSixteen’ differs from the proprietary male parent ‘BL481.2’ (unpatented) in that ‘DrisBlackSixteen’ has much larger fruit than ‘BL481.2’. Additionally, ‘DrisBlackSixteen’ has spines, whereas ‘BL481.2’ is spineless.
‘DrisBlackSixteen’ differs from the commercial variety ‘DrisBlackFour’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 24,609) in that the leaves of ‘DrisBlackSixteen’ are medium glossy and palmate shaped with predominately 5 leaflets, whereas the leaves of ‘DrisBlackFour’ are very weakly glossy and odd-pinnate shaped, with predominately 3 leaflets. Additionally, plants of ‘DrisBlackSixteen’ have a semi-upright to spreading growth habit and high vigor, whereas plants of ‘DrisBlackFour’ have an upright growth habit and low vigor.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PP6679 | Moore | Mar 1989 | P |
PP6782 | Jennings | May 1989 | P |
PP13525 | Fear | Jan 2003 | P3 |
PP13758 | Fear | May 2003 | P3 |
PP13759 | Fear | May 2003 | P3 |
PP14682 | Fear | Apr 2004 | P3 |
PP14765 | Fear et al. | May 2004 | P2 |
PP14780 | Fear et al. | May 2004 | P2 |
PP15058 | Fear et al. | Aug 2004 | P2 |
PP17162 | Clark et al. | Oct 2006 | P3 |
PP17983 | Cabrera Avalos | Sep 2007 | P2 |
PP22002 | Sills et al. | Jul 2011 | P2 |
PP22449 | Clark | Jan 2012 | P3 |
PP23497 | Clark et al. | Mar 2013 | P3 |
PP23725 | Sills et al. | Jul 2013 | P3 |
PP24249 | Clark | Feb 2014 | P3 |
PP24609 | Sills et al. | Jul 2014 | P3 |
PP24701 | Sills et al. | Jul 2014 | P3 |
PP24878 | Sills et al. | Sep 2014 | P2 |
PP25502 | Sills et al. | May 2015 | P3 |
PP26501 | Sills et al. | Mar 2016 | P3 |
PP26611 | Sills et al. | Apr 2016 | P3 |
PP26774 | Sills et al. | May 2016 | P3 |
PP27129 | Sills et al. | Sep 2016 | P2 |
PP27130 | Sills et al. | Sep 2016 | P2 |
PP27146 | Sills et al. | Sep 2016 | P2 |
20160183424 | Sills et al. | Jun 2016 | P1 |
20160183425 | Sills et al. | Jun 2016 | P1 |
20160249505 | Sills et al. | Aug 2016 | P1 |
Entry |
---|
Voss, Donald H., “The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart 2001”, Journal American Rhododendron Society, vol. 56, No. 1, 2001, 3 pages. |
Williams et al., “DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers”, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 18, No. 22, 1990, pp. 6531-6535. |