Latin name: Botanical classification: Rubus L. subgenus Rubus.
Varietal denomination: The varietal denomination of the claimed variety of blackberry plant is ‘DrisBlackThirtyThree’.
Blackberry is the common name for a multitude of plant species bearing dark purple to black aggregate fruit in the genus Rubus of the family Rosaceae. Most blackberries are within the subgenus Rubus.
Native chiefly to the northern temperate regions, blackberries are now being cultivated as a valuable fruit crop in many areas of the world, particularly in Europe, North America and Central America. Recognized for their high contents of antioxidants, dietary fiber, vitamin C, and vitamin K. Blackberry fruit are typically consumed as fresh fruit, individually quick frozen fruit, or in prepared foods, such as purées, juices, jellies, jams, grocery items, baked goods, and snack foods.
Globally, Mexico is the leading producer of blackberries, with nearly the entire crop being produced for export into the off-season fresh markets in North America and Europe. The Mexican market is almost entirely from the cultivar ‘Tupi’ (also spelled as ‘Tupy’). In the United States, Oregon is the leading commercial blackberry producer, followed by the state of California.
Blackberries are perennial plants that typically bear biennial stems (known as “canes”) from a perennial root system. The two cane types are primocanes, or first-year canes, which are usually vegetative, and floricanes, which are the same canes and produce fruit in the next growing season. In its first year, a new cane, the primocane, grows vigorously to its full length of three to six meters in a growth habit of erecting, arching, or trailing along the ground and bearing large compound leaves with 3, 5, or 7 leaflets; it does not produce any flowers. In its second year, the cane becomes a floricane and stops elongating, but the lateral buds break to produce flowering laterals that bear fruit.
Recently, primocane-fruiting blackberry varieties have been developed that are capable of flowering and fruiting on first-year canes. Primocane-fruiting blackberry varieties have several advantages, including potential of two crops on the same plant in the same year, reduction in pruning costs by mowing of canes, avoidance of winter injury, and production of fruit in an extended geographic area. However, primocane-fruiting blackberry varieties are also subject to a number of challenges, such as poor heat tolerance, lesser fruit quality, and low yield.
Blackberry is an important and valuable commercial fruit crop. Accordingly, there is a need for new varieties of blackberry plant. In particular, there is a need for improved varieties of blackberry plant that are stable, high yielding, and agronomically sound.
In order to meet these needs, the present invention is directed to an improved variety of blackberry plant. In particular, the invention relates to a new and distinct variety of blackberry plant (Rubus L. subgenus Rubus), which has been denominated as ‘DrisBlackThirty Three’.
Blackberry plant variety ‘DrisBlackThirtyThree’ was selected in Santa Cruz County, California in July of 2017 and originated from a controlled cross between the female parent blackberry plant ‘DrisBlackEight’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 26,501) and the male parent blackberry plant ‘DrisBlackTwentyThree’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 33,067). The original seedling of the new variety was first asexually propagated via root cuttings in Santa Cruz County, California in November of 2017.
‘DrisBlackThirtyThree’ was subsequently asexually propagated via root cuttings, and underwent testing in Santa Cruz County, California from 2017 to 2023 (six years). The present variety has been found to be stable and reproduce true to type through successive asexual propagations via root cuttings and tissue culture.
‘DrisBlackThirtyThree’ was selected for its yield potential, fruit size and flavor, shelf-life, spinelessness, and its moderate resistance to Fusarium wilt.
This new blackberry plant is illustrated by the accompanying photographs. The colors shown are as true as can be reasonably obtained by conventional photographic procedures. The photographs are of plants that are three to five years old.
The following descriptions set forth the distinctive characteristics of ‘DrisBlackThirtyThree’. The data that define these characteristics are based on observations taken in Santa Cruz County, California from 2017 to 2023. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. ‘DrisBlackThirtyThree’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. The botanical description of ‘DrisBlackThirtyThree’ was taken from plants that were three to five years old. The indicated values represent averages calculated from measurements of several plants. Color references are primarily to The R.H.S. Colour Chart of The Royal Horticultural Society of London (R.H.S.) (2015 edition). Descriptive terminology follows the Plant Identification Terminology, An Illustrated Glossary, 2nd edition by James G. Harris and Melinda Woolf Harris, unless where otherwise defined.
‘DrisBlackThirtyThree’ differs from the female parent ‘DrisBlackEight’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 26,501) in that ‘DrisBlackThirtyThree’ has angular to grooved cross-section of dormant cane, spines absent on dormant cane, absent or very weak undulation of margin on terminal leaflets, and the fruit shape in longitudinal section is narrow ovate, whereas ‘DrisBlackEight’ has rounded to angular cross-section of dormant cane, spines present on dormant cane, strong undulation of margin on terminal leaflets, and the fruit shape in longitudinal section is long conical. ‘DrisBlackThirtyThree’ also has higher yield potential and improved plant health compared to ‘DrisBlackEight’.
‘DrisBlackThirtyThree’ differs from the male parent ‘DrisBlackTwentyThree’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 33,067) in that ‘DrisBlackThirtyThree’ has angular to grooved cross-section of dormant cane, the undulation of margin on terminal leaflet is absent or very weak, the time of beginning of flowering on previous year's cane (floricane) is early, and the fruit shape in longitudinal section is narrow ovate, whereas ‘DrisBlackTwentyThree’ has rounded to angular cross-section of dormant cane, the undulation of margin on terminal leaflet is weak, the time of beginning of flowering on previous year's cane (floricane) is medium, and the fruit shape in longitudinal section is elliptic. ‘DrisBlackThirtyThree’ also has firmer fruit, improved plant health, and higher vigor when compared to ‘DrisBlackTwentyThree’.
‘DrisBlackThirtyThree’ differs from the reference variety ‘DrisBlackSix’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 25,502) in that ‘DrisBlackThirtyThree’ has an upright growth habit, angular to grooved cross-section of dormant cane, the predominant distribution of branches on dormant cane is only on upper third, and absent or very weak undulation of margin on terminal leaflets, whereas ‘DrisBlackSix’ has a semi-upright growth habit, rounded to angular cross-section of dormant cane, the predominant distribution of branches on dormant cane is over whole length, and weak to medium undulation of margin on terminal leaflets.
‘DrisBlackThirtyThree’ differs from the reference variety ‘DrisBlackThree’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 23,725) in that ‘DrisBlackThirtyThree’ has predominant distribution of branches only on the upper third of dormant cane, spines absent on dormant cane, weak blistering between veins on terminal leaflets, and the shape of fruit in longitudinal section is narrow ovate, whereas ‘DrisBlackThree’ has predominant distribution of branches over the whole length of dormant cane, spines present on dormant cane, medium blistering between veins on terminal leaflets, and the shape of fruit in longitudinal section is oblong.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PP6679 | Moore | Mar 1989 | P |
PP6782 | Jennings | May 1989 | P |
PP13525 | Fear et al. | Jan 2003 | P3 |
PP13758 | Fear et al. | May 2003 | P3 |
PP13759 | Fear et al. | May 2003 | P3 |
PP14682 | Fear et al. | Apr 2004 | P3 |
PP14765 | Cook et al. | May 2004 | P2 |
PP14780 | Cook et al. | May 2004 | P2 |
PP15058 | Cook et al. | Aug 2004 | P2 |
PP17162 | Moore et al. | Oct 2006 | P3 |
PP17983 | Cabrera | Sep 2007 | P2 |
PP22002 | Pabon et al. | Jul 2011 | P2 |
PP22449 | Clark | Jan 2012 | P3 |
PP23497 | Clark et al. | Mar 2013 | P3 |
PP23725 | Sills et al. | Jul 2013 | P3 |
PP24249 | Clark | Feb 2014 | P3 |
PP24609 | Rodriguez et al. | Jul 2014 | P3 |
PP24701 | Rodriguez et al. | Jul 2014 | P3 |
PP24878 | Alcazar et al. | Sep 2014 | P2 |
PP25502 | Pabon et al. | May 2015 | P3 |
PP26501 | Pabon et al. | Mar 2016 | P3 |
PP26611 | Pabon et al. | Apr 2016 | P3 |
PP26774 | Pabon et al. | May 2016 | P3 |
PP27129 | Sills et al. | Sep 2016 | P2 |
PP27130 | Sills et al. | Sep 2016 | P2 |
PP27146 | Sills et al. | Sep 2016 | P2 |
PP27681 | Sills et al. | Feb 2017 | P3 |
PP27746 | Sills et al. | Mar 2017 | P3 |
PP28548 | Sills et al. | Oct 2017 | P2 |
PP31110 | Sills et al. | Nov 2019 | P2 |
PP31291 | Sills et al. | Dec 2019 | P2 |
PP31825 | Sills et al. | Jun 2020 | P2 |
PP31826 | Sills et al. | Jun 2020 | P2 |
PP32268 | Sills et al. | Oct 2020 | P2 |
PP33067 | Sills et al. | May 2021 | P2 |
PP33068 | Sills et al. | May 2021 | P2 |
PP33088 | Sills et al. | May 2021 | P2 |
PP34069 | Sills et al. | Mar 2022 | P2 |
PP34291 | Sills et al. | Jun 2022 | P2 |
PP34320 | Escobedo et al. | Jun 2022 | P2 |
PP34438 | Sills et al. | Jul 2022 | P2 |
PP34481 | Sills et al. | Aug 2022 | P2 |
PP35078 | Sills et al. | Apr 2023 | P2 |
PP35233 | Sills et al. | Jun 2023 | P2 |
Entry |
---|
Voss, Donald H. The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart 2001 Journal American Rhododendron Society, vol. 56, No. 1 2002 3 pages. |
Williams, et al. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 18, No. 22 1990 pp. 6531-6535. |