1. Field of Invention
The present invention relates generally to an orthotic apparatus and to mechanical devices for use with the same that together assist with enabling the full normal motion of a joint as an alternative to surgical manipulation.
2. Description of Related Art
The number one complication of a joint injury is loss of motion. The loss of motion is often due to an excess production of fibrous tissue within the joint called arthrofibrosis. Arthrofibrosis is both a mechanical and a biological process which results in loss of motion of a joint.
Synovial cells make up the lining of a joint. These cells are the source of the problem called arthrofibrosis. The synovial cells transform themselves into fibroblasts upon exposure to cytokines and growth factors produced by damaged vascular endothelium. Sudden increases in range of motion produced by intermittent vigorous physical therapy or intra-operative manipulation cause bleeding within the joint further exposing the synovial cells to the cytokines and growth factors which cause arthrofibrosis.
The current methods for gaining range of motion in joints with early or late arthrofibrosis include vigorous physical therapy, specialized splints, continuous passive motion machines and surgical manipulation under anesthesia. Unfortunately, vigorous physical therapy and surgical manipulation under anesthesia have a high failure rate associated with peri-articular bleeding and the resultant progression of arthrofibrosis. Continuous passive motion machines are not effective as they spend most of the time in the middle range of motion of the joint and not focused on stretching at end range of motion.
The current specialized splints include serial casting, Dynasplint and the Joint Active System, on which the invention will provide personal opinions. All of these splints enclose the limb segment proximal and distal to the joint that needs to be stretched. Furthermore, the Dynasplint allows for only a low load stretching process. The Joint Active Systems devices allow for higher loads to be placed at the joint but at the expense of increased pressure at the limb segments proximal and distal to the joint. The loads used by the Joint Active Systems are low in intensity. Serial casting splints are not removable by the patient and have limited adjustability to change the load placed at the joint. Due to the splint design of these devices energy is trapped within the structure of the splints during the stretching process. As a result there is an unpredictable variation in load seen by the joint during the stretching process. This ‘unpredictability’ creates a sense of unease in the patient using the device to gain range of motion. None of these devices produce a load high enough to assure that for every degree the device moves the joint moves the same amount. Finally, none of these devices allow for an instantaneous or quick release of the load applied to the joint.
There is a need to produce an orthotic device for the treatment of arthrofibrosis, which can stretch the joint into full normal end range of motion in a predictable, consistent and reliable fashion. This device should be rigid enough to not allow the storage of energy within its structure. Furthermore, it should be able to produce a load at the joint high enough to assure that for every degree the device moves the joint moves the same amount. Finally, this orthotic device should allow for instantaneous or quick release of the load applied to the joint.
Generally described, the present invention to provide apparatuses and methods for evaluating the performance of joints and their associated elements.
In accordance with the purposes of the various embodiments of the present invention as described herein, an apparatus is provided that comprises an actuator and a linkage. The actuator itself comprises: 1) an actuator portion defining an interior cavity; and 2) an inflatable bladder member at least partially inside the cavity of the cylinder portion. The inflatable bladder includes a movable inflatable bladder portion that is configured to move in response to inflation of the bladder. The linkage is operatively positioned intermediate the movable inflatable bladder portion and an area of a patient needing treatment and further configured to be activated and to impose treatment upon inflation of the bladder.
In accordance with an additional aspect of the present invention, an apparatus is provided that comprises an actuator, a linkage, and a patient connection and manipulation device. The actuator itself comprises: 1) an actuator portion defining an interior cavity; and 2) an inflatable bladder member at least partially inside the cavity of the cylinder portion. The inflatable bladder includes a movable inflatable bladder portion that is configured to move in response to inflation of the bladder. The linkage is operatively positioned intermediate the movable inflatable bladder portion and an area of a patient needing treatment and further configured to be activated and to impose treatment upon inflation of the bladder. The patient connection and manipulation device is configured to be attached relative to the patient, attached intermediate the linkage and the patient, and configured to at least partially assist with treatment upon activation of the linkage.
In accordance with an additional aspect of the present invention, a joint manipulation device for manipulating the joint of a patient, the patient having two bones connected at the joint, is provided. The joint manipulation device comprises an actuator and a linkage. The actuator itself comprises: 1) a cylinder portion defining an interior cavity; 2) a piston portion configured to move relative to cylinder portion within the cavity; and 3) an inflatable bladder member at least partially inside the cavity of the cylinder portion, the actuator configured such that inflation of the bladder causes the piston portion to move relative to cylinder portion. The linkage is operatively positioned intermediate the actuator and the joint of the patient, the linkage configured to be activated and to flex the joint upon inflation of the bladder.
In accordance with an additional aspect of the present invention, a joint manipulation device for manipulating the joint of a patient, the patient having two bones connected at the joint, is provided. The joint manipulation device comprises an actuator and a linkage. The actuator itself comprises: 1) a cylinder portion defining an interior cavity; 2) a piston portion configured to move relative to cylinder portion within the cavity; and 3) an inflatable bladder member at least partially inside the cavity of the cylinder portion, the actuator configured such that inflation of the bladder causes the piston portion to move relative to cylinder portion. The linkage is operatively positioned intermediate the actuator and the joint of the patient, the linkage configured to be activated and to flex the joint upon inflation of the bladder.
In accordance with an additional aspect of the present invention, a joint manipulation device for manipulating the joint of a patient, the patient having two bones connected at the joint, is provided. The joint manipulation device comprises an actuator and a linkage. The actuator itself comprises: 1) a cylinder portion defining an interior cavity; 2) a piston portion configured to move linearly relative to cylinder portion within the interior cavity; and 3) an inflatable bladder member at least partially inside the cavity of the cylinder portion, the actuator configured such that inflation of the bladder causes the piston portion to move linearly relative to cylinder portion within the interior cavity. The linkage is operatively positioned intermediate the actuator and the joint of the patient, the linkage configured to be activated and to flex the joint upon inflation of the bladder.
In accordance with an additional aspect of the present invention, a joint manipulation device for manipulating the joint of a patient, the patient having two bones connected at the joint, is provided. The joint manipulation device comprises an actuator, a linkage, and a patient connection and manipulation device. The actuator comprises: 1) a cylinder portion defining an interior cavity; 2) a piston portion configured to move linearly relative to cylinder portion within the interior cavity; and 3) an inflatable bladder member at least partially inside the cavity of the cylinder portion, the actuator configured such that inflation of the bladder causes the piston portion to move linearly relative to cylinder portion within the interior cavity. The linkage is operatively positioned intermediate the actuator and the joint of the patient, the linkage configured to be activated and to flex the joint upon inflation of the bladder. The patient connection and manipulation device is configured to be attached relative to the patient, attached intermediate the linkage and the patient, and configured to at least partially assist flexion of the joint of the patient upon activation of the linkage.
In accordance with an additional aspect of the present invention, a joint manipulation device for manipulating the joint of a patient, the patient having two bones connected at the joint, is provided. The joint manipulation device comprises an actuator, a linkage, and a patient connection and manipulation device. The actuator comprises: 1) an actuator portion defining an interior cavity; 2) an inflatable bladder member at least partially inside the cavity of the cylinder portion, the inflatable bladder including a movable inflatable bladder portion, the actuator configured such that inflation of the bladder causes the movable inflatable bladder portion to move. The linkage is operatively positioned intermediate the movable inflatable bladder portion and the joint of the patient, the linkage configured to be activated and to flex the joint upon inflation of the bladder. The patient connection and manipulation device is configured to be attached relative to the patient, attached intermediate the linkage and the patient, and configured to at least partially assist flexion of the joint of the patient upon activation of the linkage.
Other aspects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the invention when taken in conjunction with the drawing and the appended claims.
Having thus described the invention in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
I. General Overview
The invention generally is directed towards various embodiments of a bladder-driven linear actuator system for use with a variety of patient testing and measurement devices. Generally described, the various embodiments of the system include the use of an inflatable and deflatable balloon (e.g., a bladder), which is captured within a cylinder and a sliding head member. The balloon may be inflated with any number of manual or automated pumps or other inflation systems. Because air is trapped inside the balloon during inflation, the cylinder itself does not require an air-tight seal, and the sliding head does not need to seal tight to the inner diameter of the moveable external member (not shown in
The present invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not all embodiments of the inventions are shown. Indeed, these inventions may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
II. Element List
III. Outline
A) The Bladder Driven Systems
B) Globe Systems
C) Joint Distraction Systems
D) Miscellaneous
IV. Details
A) The Bladder Driven Systems
1) Generally
Generally described, these systems according to various embodiments include the use of an inflatable and deflatable balloon (e.g., a bladder), which is captured within a cylinder and a sliding head member. The balloon may be inflated with any number of manual or automated pumps or other inflation systems. Because air is trapped inside the balloon during inflation, the cylinder itself does not require an air-tight seal, and the sliding head does not need to seal tight to the inner diameter of the cylinder. As the balloon is inflated, the sliding head member moves linearly within the cylinder.
2) Bladder Driven Linear Actuator System 10 (
Reference is now made to
The balloon according to various embodiments may be inflated with any number of manual or automated pumps or other inflation systems. Because air is trapped inside the balloon during inflation, the cylinder itself does not require an air-tight seal, and the sliding head does not need to seal tight to the inner diameter of the cylinder. As the balloon is inflated the sliding head member moves linearly within the cylinder. During this inflation, a subcavity 19S of the cavity 19 at least partially defined by the cylinder wall 12 contains the balloon 14 (see
In at least the embodiment shown in
According to various embodiments, as best understood from
In any of these and still other envisioned embodiments, the use of an inflatable/deflatable balloon 24 substantially eliminates the need for complex seals, as is customary with conventionally designed air cylinders. In addition, in certain embodiments, the elastic nature of the balloon allows for the external moveable member to slowly return to the initial start position in a controlled manner as the air is released from the balloon.
3) Bladder Driven Linear Actuator System 20 (
This configuration includes the following elements:
According to various embodiments of the system 20, instead of the use of tension strings or the like, compression elements may be used such as a solid connecting rod 28. In at least certain embodiments, the rod 28 may be pushed/pulled by the sliding head member 26. This rod 28 may, in certain embodiments move straight along its longitudinal axis so as to push an external member (linearly as shown in
According to various embodiments, as best understood from
According to various envisioned embodiments of the system 20 as illustrated in
4) Bladder Driven Linear Actuator System 30 (
This configuration includes the following elements:
As has been described previously, according to various embodiments as shown in
According to various envisioned embodiments of the system 30 as illustrated in
5) Bladder Driven Linear Actuator System 40 (
According to various embodiments, the configuration of system 40 includes elements substantially similar to those shown in
6) Bladder Driven Linear Actuator System 50 (
According to various embodiments, the configuration of system 50 as illustrated in at least
7) Bladder Driven Linear Actuator System 60 (
According to various embodiments, the configuration of system 60 as illustrated in at least
8) Use to Move Other External Members
According to various embodiments, the external member could be any of the moving members noted above, or other of a variety of member(s) needing movement, as may be desired for a particular application. It should be understood that such member(s), whatever their configuration and/or orientation, should be considered as contemplated within the scope of the present invention.
While not limited specifically to medical use, such systems as previously discussed herein and illustrated in at least
The aforementioned bladder driven cylinder (a.k.a. air cylinder) can be incorporated according to various embodiments into any of a variety of particularly inventive mechanical therapy devices, which may be intended to improve joint range of motion. As a non-limiting example, the cylinder may be employed for the purposes of stretching contracted tissue, wherein the proximal segment of a joint in one embodiment may be held in a constant position while the distal segment is moved. In these and still other envisioned embodiments, devices intended to increase joint range of motion may have an external member attached to the distal segment, such that moving the external member causes rotation about the desired joint thus stretching the targeted contracted tissue. In such instances, the aforementioned air cylinder according to any of the various embodiments described previously herein and further additionally envisioned, may be effectively used to provide the desired stretching torque, as inflating the balloon will cause the external member attached to the distal segment to rotate and stretch the tissue.
As yet another non-limiting example, the aforementioned bladder driven cylinder assembly (a.k.a. air cylinder) may be employed for the purposes of flexing contracted finger tissue, as generally shown in
According to various embodiments, the cylinder assembly 500 may include a cap 505, a cylinder 515, and a bladder 510, as shown in at least
According to various embodiments, the cylinder assembly 500 may be coupled to an external member 502 configured to capture one or more of the patient's appendages. While the illustrated embodiment includes a single external member 502 that encircles a single finger of the patient, alternative members may encircle, or otherwise grasp or retain, two or more fingers, thumbs, and/or wrists, or any combination thereof, as may be desired for a particular application. In this manner, in use, various embodiments cause flexion of the captured appendage by applying a desired level of force to the appendage in response to an inflation of the bladder 510 and a travel of the cap 505 along the cylinder assembly 500.
According to various embodiments, the cylinder assembly 500 may be coupled to the external member 502 via a string 504 (see
Still further, in all of these and still other envisioned embodiments, the string 504 may be attached in any manner desirable provided inflation of the bladder 510 causes the string to move the external member 502 in such a manner as to cause flexion of the patient's appendage (e.g., finger(s), wrist, hand, etc.).
B) Globe Systems
1) Generally
As a non-limiting example, one type of a device using the aforementioned and described various embodiments of a bladder driven cylinder (a.k.a. air cylinder) system is a device which can be included in a “globe” system. In these and still other envisioned embodiments, such “globe” systems generally include the use of a hollow globe that substantially encircles the hand, with the globe having at least one through port which is configured to accept the distal end of the lower arm of a patient/user, as will be described in further detail below.
2) The Wrist Globe Systems
One non-limiting example of various “globe” systems that may, in accordance with various embodiments, be used together with any of the bladder driven linear cylinder systems of
According to various envisioned embodiments, the therapy device 100 generally includes the following subassemblies:
As shown generally in
According to various embodiments, the globe 110 may further have at least one through-port provided by the cylindrical forearm capturing member 120. In certain embodiments, the member 120 may be configured to accept the distal end of the lower arm of a patient/user. In these and other envisioned embodiments, the forearm capturing member 120 may be rigidly attached relative to the globe (which could be considered the main frame of the device 100), while in still other embodiments, the member 120 may be selectively removably attached relative to the globe. In any of these various embodiments, it should be understood that the member 120 is generally configured to keep the forearm of the user 5 in a relatively constant position while the hand capturing member 130, positioned inside the globe, captures the hand of the user 5.
The hand capturing member 130 according to various embodiments is configured so as to be rotatably mounted relative to the globe 110, such that its axis of rotation PRA (see, for example,
According to various embodiments, the spherical or hemispherical shape of member 130 may further allow rigid rods (or the like) to be connected (either fixedly or selectively removably) relative to the proximal portion of the hand capturing member, as will be described in further detail herein-below.
Rotation of the hand capturing member 130 according to various embodiments may alternatively be facilitated by the bladder driven linear actuator system 150 (perhaps best understood from at least
Globe 110
According to various envisioned embodiments, the globe possesses a substantially globular shape, although in at least certain embodiments, it may be configured to be selectively broken apart to access the interior as needed.
Cylindrical Forearm Capturing Member 120
Returning to
Hand Capturing Member 130
Remaining with
Pivot Rod 140
The pivot rod 140 according to various embodiments and as illustrated in, for example,
Returning to at least the illustrated embodiment, which can be understood in further conjunction with
Bladder Driven Linear Actuator System 150
According to various embodiments, the bladder driven linear actuator system 150 may contain elements configured substantially similar to those of the bladder driven linear actuator system 10 described above. In these and still other envisioned embodiments, the system 150 may comprise at least the following elements:
152 Cylinder Wall
153 Fixed End Cap
154 Inflatable/Deflatable Balloon
155 rubber bulb pump
156 Sliding head member
157 return rubber band (or spring etc)
158 Tensioning string
159 External member
A tensioning string 158 according to various embodiments may be inserted through horizontal slots (not numbered, but illustrated in at least
In any of these and other envisioned embodiments, a rubber bulb pump 155 may further be attached relative to the balloon, such that squeezing of the balloon 155 causes the balloon to inflate, which results in the linear movement of the sliding head member 156 relative to the cylinder wall 152 (see
As a non-limiting example, in the treatment of joint contractures, the patient generally needs to be treated daily in order to create lasting gains in range of motion. In one such treatment protocol, the patient, when using an exemplary “globe” system may be asked to inflate the balloon 155 using the hand bulb until the hand capturing member rotates to a position in which the patient feels a comfortable stretch. In certain embodiments, the patient may then be asked to maintain this position for 5 to 15 minute intervals. If during the course of a treatment interval, the intensity of the stretch diminishes as the tissue is lengthened, patients may then be instructed to again squeeze the hand bulb to maintain the most effective stretching intensity. Patients are then asked to repeat the 5 to 15 minute stretching interval throughout the day in order to achieve 60 minutes of end range stretching per day. Of course, alternative methods of treatment and protocols for the same may be employed, as contemplated within the scope of using the devices of the present invention.
3) The Finger Globe Systems 200
Yet another non-limiting example of various “globe” systems that may, in accordance with various embodiments be used together with any of the bladder driven linear cylinder systems of
According to various envisioned embodiments, the system 200 may generally include the following subassemblies:
In other envisioned embodiments, the system 10, as previously described herein, may be used to increase finger motion. However, in any of these and still other envisioned embodiments, it should be understood that the various Finger Globe Systems (e.g., 200) generally feature an air cylinder, a method to stabilize the proximal segment, and a method to capture the distal segment in such a way that allows the air cylinder to pull a tensioning string causing rotation of the contracted joint, as have been generally described previously herein with regard to various other systems.
According to various embodiments, the finger device may also use a spherical or hemispherical exterior member to allow for multiple angles for the axis of rotation. This can be set and adjusted as such that the axis of rotation is set 13° from being perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the forearm. As illustrated in
Unlike the wrist device described above, the finger device according to various embodiments generally does not attempt to move the entire hand, but instead primarily attempts to individually move a single joint on a single finger. In certain embodiments, this is accomplished by the use of a distal capturing member 300, such as that shown in at least
In order to achieve its movement of a single joint according to various embodiments, the distal capturing member must generally be configured so as it is capable of movement in at least three (3) degrees of freedom. In certain embodiments, the primary axis of rotation must generally remain free to move throughout use, whereas the other two degrees of freedom are used at the beginning of a treatment period to properly align the distal capturing device on the desired joint to be treated. In these and still other envisioned embodiments, these latter two degrees of freedom may likewise remain free during adjustment, but may also in at least certain embodiments be secured in location to ensure consistent proper alignment throughout the treatment period.
The primary axis of rotation is the axis that the member 300 must rotate about in order to flex and extend the finger or finger portion, as illustrated in at least
According to various embodiments, the distal capturing member 300 must be able to translate medially and laterally along the primary axis of rotation in order to isolate the individual finger. In at least the illustrated embodiment of
It should further be understood that by allowing the distal capturing member to have 3 degrees of freedom according to various embodiments, the 2nd through 5th digits of a patient/user's hand may all be treated appropriately according to the patient's natural alignment.
It should be understood that an inability to correctly align the axis of rotation of a portion of the person's body with the person's natural rotational axis will result in rotation about an unnatural axis of rotation, either limiting the ability of the device to treat the patient's condition or potentially placing unintended rotational stress on tissues not involved with the joint contracture. As such, the member 300 according to various embodiments of the invention, however, configured, shaped, or sized, must be such that, at a minimum, proper alignment about an axis of rotation of a portion of the patient/user's body is attainable, as illustrated in at least
In at least certain embodiments, the use of the spherical or hemispherical exterior member allows the health care provider to realign the axis of rotation as holes or slots can be placed in any position in the globe in order to accommodate the wrist-pivot or finger-pivot related member described herein. This allows an infinite number of potential axes that can be used, thus allowing for the axis of rotation to be perfectly aligned for each individual patient.
4) Various Methods of Using the Above-Described Globe Systems Generally
For all of the joints mentioned above, a treatment protocol similar to the previously described 60 minutes/day would effectively increase joint range of motion.
In all embodiments of both the wrist and finger devices, many methods may be utilized to capture and/or stabilize both the segment proximal to and distal to the contracted joint. Both the proximal and distal members can be adjustable to account for variability in finger, hand, and forearm dimensions between patients. In the wrist system, the hand capturing member can made in different sizes for different sized hands, or can made to be adjustable with set screws or elastic components such as the thumb-operated thumbscrews depicted in
For both the finger and wrist devices, both the proximal and distal capturing/support members may also be customized by a health care professional to match each patient. In one embodiment, these customized capturing/support members can be formed with currently marketed heat-moldable plastics, either with or without the use of foam inserts to provide cushioning to prevent areas of high pressure to prevent excess stress and the risk of skin breakdown.
C) Joint Distraction Systems
The Bladder Driven Linear Actuator System 10 according to various embodiments may also be used to provide joint distraction, as shown in at least
The conventional method to distract the joint is to attach an external member to the hand and wrist, which is then attached to a string and pulley system. A static weight is then attached to the opposite end of the string to provide a constant distraction load. However, this technique does not take into account differ patient body sizes. A 10 pound weight will cause much greater distraction the shoulder of a pediatric patient or frail, elderly patient than it would a 6′2″, 280 pound industrial worker.
In contrast to these conventional methods, the use of the Bladder Driven Linear Actuator System 10 would allow for varying levels of force to be applied for each individual patient. By placing a graded scale on the exterior of the wall of the air cylinder, health care professionals could monitor the distance that the joint is distracted, thus creating consistent, reproducible operating conditions for all patients no matter his or her height and weight.
In certain embodiments, a Velcro strap would be placed around the patient's proximal upper arm, just distal to the elbow. One side of the tensioning string could be attached to the lateral aspect of the arm strap and the other attached to the medial aspect of the strap. Then, as the balloon was inflated with the hand bulb, shoulder joint distraction would occur (such as shown in
In addition, similar methods and devices could be utilized according to various embodiments previously described herein and further envisioned to provide the distraction necessary to reduce a displaced fracture or when resetting a fracture. Similar methods and devices could then be used to treat tibial, femoral, radial, ulnar, and humeral fractures.
D) Miscellaneous
As shown in at least
V. Conclusion
The foregoing description of the various embodiments of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Obvious modifications or variations are possible in light of the above teachings. The embodiments were chosen and described to provide the best illustration of the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. All such modifications and variations are within the scope of the invention as determined by the appended claims when interpreted in accordance with the breadth to which they are fairly, legally and equitably entitled. The drawings and preferred embodiments do not and are not intended to limit the ordinary meaning of the claims in their fair and broad interpretation in any way.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/377,688, filed Aug. 27, 2010, entitled “Robotic Knee Testing Device, Subjective Patient Input Device, Bladder Driven Linear Actuator, and Methods for Using the Same,” and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/385,792, filed Sep. 23, 2010, entitled “Bladder Driven Linear Cylinder and Associated Devices Driven Thereby,” both of which are incorporated herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
T100602 | Roley et al. | May 1981 | I4 |
4294141 | Miller | Oct 1981 | A |
4407277 | Ellison | Oct 1983 | A |
4586495 | Petrofsky | May 1986 | A |
4650183 | McIntyre | Mar 1987 | A |
4727860 | McIntyre | Mar 1988 | A |
4733859 | Kock et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4771548 | Donnery | Sep 1988 | A |
4782831 | Gallant | Nov 1988 | A |
4823807 | Russell et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4825852 | Genovese et al. | May 1989 | A |
4834073 | Bledsoe et al. | May 1989 | A |
4909262 | Halpern et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4930497 | Saringer | Jun 1990 | A |
5027799 | Laico et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5056535 | Bonnell | Oct 1991 | A |
5211161 | Stef | May 1993 | A |
5228432 | Kaiser et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5335674 | Siegler | Aug 1994 | A |
5362298 | Brown et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5382225 | Sutcliffe | Jan 1995 | A |
5399147 | Kaiser | Mar 1995 | A |
5402800 | Hollis | Apr 1995 | A |
5435321 | McMillen et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5645079 | Zahiri et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
4278860 | McIntyre | Mar 1998 | A |
6599255 | Zhang | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6669660 | Branch | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6821231 | Hall | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6872186 | Branch et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7041069 | West | May 2006 | B2 |
7479121 | Branch | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7547289 | Branch | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7628766 | Kazerooni et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7665167 | Branch et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7753862 | Branch et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7854685 | Cole et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7951097 | Schaeffer | May 2011 | B2 |
7985227 | Branch et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
20040260208 | Laprade et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050222573 | Branch et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060064048 | Stano | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060097557 | Tholkes et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070055176 | Branch et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070123997 | Herr et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129653 | Sugar et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20090124936 | Branch et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090264797 | Mayr | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100179605 | Branch et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20120046540 | Branch et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120085353 | Siston | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2615171 | Jan 2007 | CA |
36 09 535 | Sep 1987 | DE |
39 25 014 | Jan 1991 | DE |
0 204 639 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0293372 | Jun 1991 | EP |
1 219 240 | Jul 2002 | EP |
WO 8804536 | Jun 1988 | WO |
WO 8804536 | Jun 1988 | WO |
WO 9302621 | Feb 1993 | WO |
WO 02096274 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2007009063 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2009064367 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2012021726 | Feb 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
B.D. Beynnon et al., “The Effect of Functional Knee-Braces On Strain On The Anterior Cruciate Ligament In Vivo,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery; Boston, US; vol. 74A, No. 9; Oct. 1, 1992; pp. 1298-1312; XP000322579. |
Daniel, “MEDmetric® Knee Ligament Arthrometer ModelsKT1000™ and KT2000™,” Reference, Maintenance and User guide for the Knee Ligament Arthrometer®, 1st Ed., May 1993, 51 pp. San Diego, CA. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2006/027376 filed Apr. 19, 2007. |
International Search Report from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2008/012578. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, where Applicable, Protest Fee Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2008/012578. |
Li-Wun Zhang et al., “Dynamic and Static Properties of The Human Knee Joint in Axial Rotation,” Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1997, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Chicago, IL, USA Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 1997; Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, US; vol. 4; Oct. 30, 1997; pp. 1738-1741; XP010325504. |
Markolf, K. L., et al., “In vivo knee stability. A quantitative assessment using an instrumented clinical testing apparatus,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume Jul. 1978, vol. 60, No. 5, Jul. 1978, XP002515912, ISSN: 0021-9355, p. 664-p. 674. |
Medmetric Corporation, “In These Times of Managed Care, Measured Outcomes are Crucial,” found at http://web.archive.org/web120040610111553/http://medmetric.com (1 page). |
Medmetric Corporation, “KT1000/S;” found at http://web.archive.org/web/20040628060104/www.kt1000.com/kts.htm (2 pages). |
Medmetric Corporation, “KT2000,” found at http://web.archive.org/web/20040618192953/www.kt1000.com/kts.htm (2 pages). |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 9, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 11/457,443, filed Jul. 13, 2006. |
Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/457,443, filed Jul. 13, 2006. |
Roley et al., “T100,602—Apparatus for Measuring Angles,” United States Defensive Publication, May 5, 1981; 5 pages. |
S.C. Shoemaker et al., “In-Vivo Rotatory Knee Stability Ligamentous and Muscular Contributions,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery; Boston, US; vol. 64, No. 2; 1982; pp. 208-216; XP008050394. |
Shino, K. et al., “Measurement of anterior instability of the knee. A new apparatus for clinical testing,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume, Aug. 1987, vol. 69, No. 4, Aug. 1987, XP002515908; ISSN: 0301-620X, p. 608-p. 613. |
Shultz Sandra, J., et al., “Measurement of varus-valgus and internal-external rotational knee laxities in vivo—Part I: assessment of measurement reliability and bilateral asymmetry,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research: Official Publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Aug. 2007, vol. 25, No. 8, Aug. 2007, XP002515908, ISSN: 0736-0266, p. 981-p. 988. |
Uh B.S., et al., “A new device to measure knee laxity during weightbearing and non-weightbearing conditions,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research: Official Publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society Nov. 2001, vol. 19, No. 6, Nov. 2001, XP002515911; ISSN: 0736-0266, p. 1185-p. 1191. |
Van Der Esch, M. et al., “Reproducibility of instrumented knee joint laxity measurement in healthy subjects,” Rheumatology (Oxford, England) May 2006, vol. 45, No. 5, May 2006, pp. 595-599, XP002515910; ISSN: 1462-0324. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Nov. 17, 2011, for Application No. PCT/US2011/047696. |
Branch, et al. “Instrumented Examination of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Minimizing Flaws of the Manual Clinical Examination,” Arthroscopy, vol. 26, No. 7, Jul. 2010, pp. 997-1004. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/047696, mailed Aug. 3, 2012, 8 pages, European Patent Office, The Netherlands. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/797,324, dated Oct. 1, 2012, 9 pages, USA. |
Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/267,109, filed Nov. 7, 2008. |
Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/797,324, filed Jun. 9, 2010. |
European Patent Office, Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2012, for Application No. EP06787304.2. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/209,380, Jun. 4, 2013, 29 pages, USA. |
Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/797,324, filed Jun. 9, 2010. |
International Searching Authority, ISR and Written Opinion for International Appn No. PCT/US20121048377, mailed Jan. 4, 2013, 20 pages, EPO, The Netherlands. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/267,109, dated Mar. 13, 2013, 28 pages, USA. |
International Searching Authority, ISR and Written Opinion for International Appn No. PCT/US2013/060229, mailed Dec. 5, 2013, 12 pages, EPO, The Netherlands. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120053495 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61377688 | Aug 2010 | US | |
61385792 | Sep 2010 | US |