The present invention relates to throwing wheels, sometimes referred to as blasting wheels or shotblast wheels, used to project streams of particles against work pieces to subject the work pieces to cleaning, abrading or peening action or the like. A typical wheel of this kind is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,476,412. Among the objects of the present invention is an improved apparatus for and method of connecting blades to a single wheel plate or to a set of interconnected wheel plates for a centrifugal blasting wheel.
Airless centrifugal throwing wheels of the type described consist of a single or double wheel plate having a number of blades extending radially from the wheel plate(s) in equally circumferentially spaced apart relation, with a means of removable securing the blades between the wheel plate(s). In operation, the bladed wheel is rotated at high speed about a central axis and abrasive particulate material is fed onto the inner portions of the blade whereby the material is displaced by centrifugal force outwardly over the surface of the blades and projected at high velocity from the ends of the blades.
Blades of this type typically wear out under the abrading effects of the particles that are thrown. These abrasive particles move along the blades and gradually wear out portions of the throwing wheel as well as the blades themselves. Further when the particulate that is being used needs to be changed to a different material either in abrasiveness or otherwise, or when the blades become worn, the blades need to be removed and the equipment needs to be reset.
Because of the tolerances of blade casting, as well as wearing of the channel slot in the wheel and connecting member projecting from the blade through use, the channel slot is or becomes larger than the blade connecting member. This results in a sloppy fit of the blade to the wheel allowing minute particulate to work its way into the blade mounting channel which tends to seize the blade to the throwing wheel, typically referred to in the industry as “shot locking”.
This “shot-locking” makes removal of the Blades difficult and includes potential safety issues as the blades may require substantial force to remove. Typically in order to remove a prior art blade, significant downward striking force is required, such as with a hammer. blades are typically constructed of cast white iron or high chrome iron, which is very brittle, and can crack or chip when struck. These chips at times “splinter” and can cause safety issues for operators and/or damage to other wheel components.
In many prior designs, blades must be “hammered” out of the corresponding wheel channel the entire length of the blade locking connection before the blade can be removed.
Many connecting methods have been devised to attach blades to wheel plates. Some methods requires pins, springs or other mechanical locking devices. One such method is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,869,289 which utilizes leaf springs to attach the blades to the wheel. The prior art also used a stop member that was inserted through the wheel to prevent the blades from moving radially outward. In addition to stopping the blade from movement, the stop members are used to properly position the blades in the wheel to allow for proper balancing of the rotating wheel. Because of the complexity and precision needed to properly install the blades, installation of the blades in the prior art is time consuming and difficult. Further the stop member is subject to failure and damage more quickly then the surrounding structure.
Another such connecting method is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,476,412. The prior art utilizes a simple dove tail design that narrows along the blade connecting member, that corresponds with the connecting channel to the outer section of the rotating wheel. The centrifugal outward force keeps the blades in place while the wheel rotates. The prior art uses a trapezoidal design that creates parallel surfaces between the blade and wheel. The prior art design requires the blade to “wedge” into the “V” groove channel of the wheel. Due to difficulty in casting this prior art blade, actual blade location in the wedge can vary causing the wheel to be imbalanced even with new blades. As with other prior art, this design also suffers from issues of “shot-locking” as described above.
The disadvantages of prior art can be overcome by providing a method of equal and continuous non-parallel contact between blade and wheel plate surfaces and eliminating parallel surfaces that cause blades to become “shot-locked” with abrasive grit.
Additionally, the blade and wheel are both cast with a repeatable and positive locating position for the blade within the wheel channel insuring proper wheel balance at high rotational speeds of up to 3600 rpm.
The wheel apparatus is provided with a plurality of blade elements having a tapered “ellipse” shape in the cross section beginning with a larger ellipse at the center radiating out to a smaller ellipse near the out diameter of the wheel. Each blade is provided with a similar tapered ellipse that slides into an equally tapered elliptical wheel slot channel of the wheel providing the desired equal and continuous contact between the wheel apparatus and the blade(s).
In a preferred embodiment, the invention is directed toward an interlocking joint connection between the wheel plate and wheel blade. The joint includes a frustum-shaped radially extending channel or mortise formed in the wheel and a corresponding frustum-shaped tenon projecting from the blade. Both the mortise and tenon have a longitudinal axis extending radially from the axis of rotation of the wheel and an elliptically-shaped cross section, and both are tapered so that their radially inner end has a greater cross sectional area than their radially outer end.
When blade removal is required, the mating tapered ellipse(s) of blade and wheel channel provide a measured and increasingly improved release in that all distances between the blade and the wheel channel slot continually increase as the blade is slid further out of the wheel channel slot from the locked position to the center removal position.
Wherein, the wheel plate(s) has an elliptical tapered channel slot extending from the center area of the wheel to the outer diameter.
Wherein, the elliptical channel slot has an opening that is larger at the inner portion of the wheel and tapering in a continual ellipse equally with the wheel plate(s) on all surfaces to a lesser opening near the outer portion of the wheel.
Wherein, the blade(s) are cast with an equally tapered ellipse, larger at the feed end and smaller at the exit end, matching the continually tapered ellipse channel slot(s) of the wheel plate.
Wherein, the blade ellipse is positioned into the wheel elliptical channel slot providing an equal and continuously tapered connection with no parallel surfaces between the blade and wheel plate(s).
Wherein, the elliptical blade connecting means corresponds to the elliptical channel slot on the wheel plate(s).
Wherein the casting process of the ellipse blade and wheel channel design eliminates parallel flat surfaces that can cause shot locking between the blade and wheel channel slot(s).
Wherein, the ellipse blade design has a positive blade position within the ellipse channel slot that is repeatable due to casting process and design.
Accordingly, in one aspect, the present invention provides a centrifugal blasting wheel comprising:
Preferably, the cross sectional shape of the channel is an ellipse.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a blade releasably connectable to a wheel plate of a centrifugal blasting wheel, comprising:
Preferably, the cross sectional shape of the connecting member is an ellipse.
Typical forms of prior art blades 12 and 16 are shown in
The blade 12 is typically inserted from the inner central portion of the wheel plate 10 and moved or slid radially outwardly so that tenon 19 slidably engages channel or mortise 8 to form an interlocking joint.
Another typical form of prior art wheel plate is shown in
Referring now to
The preferred embodiment of the wheel plate of the present invention is shown in
The preferred embodiment of the blade 26 of the present invention used with a single sided wheel plate is shown in
The preferred embodiments of the blades 26, 27 have a blade to wheel channel slot connecting member or members located at the longitudinal side edge(s) thereof. The invention utilizes a blade connecting member or tenon 22 of a continually tapering ellipse design in that the radially outer end 29 of the tapered tenon is lesser in cross sectional area than the tapered radially inner end 30 tenon. Thus, both the height (h) and width (w) of tenon 22 is greater at inner end 30 than at outer end 29.
The preferred embodiment of the wheel plate channel(s) or mortise 24 is shown in
The wheel plate channel slot or mortise 24 has an elliptical cross sectional shape in that both the width of and height of the ellipse located at the radially outer end of the channel slot FB is smaller in total area than the radially inner end of the channel slot EB as show in
The preferred embodiment of the blade connecting member or tenon 22 corresponds to the cross section of the wheel channel slot 24 in that the radially outer width FCW of tenon 22 in
Additionally
In order to assemble the blade 26 and wheel 25, the outer end 29 of the tenon 22 is positioned in alignment with channel 24 at inner periphery 31, and radially inwardly thereof. Tenon 22 is then slid into channel 24 until stop member 37 engages and abuts against stop wall 34. Thereafter, blade 26 may be locked in place in any conventional manner.
Although this disclosure has described and illustrated certain embodiments of the invention, it is to be understood that the invention is not restricted to these particular embodiments but encompass other embodiments that may include functional or mechanical equivalents to features that have been described and illustrated herein.
The embodiments of the invention in which we claim an exclusive property or privilege are defined as follows:
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2012/031866 | 4/2/2012 | WO | 00 | 9/27/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/135836 | 10/4/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4649673 | Van Huyssteen | Mar 1987 | A |
5209024 | Carpenter et al. | May 1993 | A |
5476412 | Stoltz | Dec 1995 | A |
5759091 | MacMillan | Jun 1998 | A |
20030002987 | Davidson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140038498 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61470877 | Apr 2011 | US |