The present invention is directed to blade cartridges and razors employing such blade cartridges. The cartridges contain a guard on its leading edge, which comprises an array of flexible fins. There is at least one change in stiffness among the different fins situated within the array.
Utilization of guards on the leading edge of razor blade cartridges is well known. Many guard designs contain a series of individual fins that are made from elastomeric materials, enabling them to flex back and forth as the blade cartridge is moved over the skin surface. The fins are designed to stimulate and stretch the skin in front of the blades to improve comfort and proper positioning of the skin for cutting of hairs growing outwardly from the skin. In addition to this function, the first fin or first few fins (that is, the fins furthest away from or distal to the blades) also serve to remove excess shave preparation from the skin prior to blade interaction. The possibility and/or historical experience with irritation and nicks and cuts may cause some consumers to apply an excessive amount of shave preparation to their skin. The significant amount of preparation can however create too much of a cushion between the blade and the skin to achieve a satisfactorily close shave.
Applicants have discovered that the flexibility needs of the fins conducting the separate functions of removing excess shave preparation and stimulating/stretching the skin can be at odds with each other. In particular, applicants have discovered that while it can be beneficial to employ moderately pliable fins for stimulating and stretching the skin, this level of flexibility can cause the fins to “slide” over a layer of shave preparation rather than “pushing” the preparation out of the way. Furthermore, if the initial fin or fins fail to adequately remove the excess shaving preparation, the remaining fins cannot make good contact with the skin to perform the function of stimulating and stretching the skin. But including relatively stiff fins throughout the array of fins to ensure preparation removal may lead to skin irritation, both from the guard itself and from close blade interaction with the skin. Applicants accordingly have designed an improved guard including a plurality of fins that comprises one or more distal fins that are stiffer than one or more proximal fins, wherein the plurality of fins can collectively remove a targeted amount of shave preparation and position the skin and hair for a close and comfortable shave.
While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which is regarded as forming the present invention, it is believed that illustrative embodiments of the present invention may be better understood from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention may be understood more readily by reference to the following detailed description of illustrative and preferred embodiments. It is to be understood that the scope of the claims is not limited to the specific components, methods, conditions, devices, or parameters described herein, and that the terminology used herein is not intended to be limiting of the claimed invention. Also, as used in the specification, including the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include the plural, and reference to a particular numerical value includes at least that particular value, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. When a range of values is expressed, another embodiment includes from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent basis “about,” it will be understood that the particular values form another embodiment. All ranges are inclusive and combinable.
Referring now to the figures and in particular to
An enlarged view of blade cartridge 14 is shown in
Exemplary guard 22 will be further described with reference to
The guard can serve one or more functions, including, for example, removing excess shaving preparation from the skin, and stretching and stimulating the skin prior to blade exposure. As noted above, Applicants have discovered that the flexibility needs of the fins conducting the separate functions of removing excess shave preparation and stimulating/stretching the skin can be at odds with each other. To address this Applicant-identified design compromise, the array of fins has at least one change in stiffness among the different fins situated within the array. In one embodiment, a sub-array of one or more fins 60 that are farthest or distal to the blades are stiffer than a sub-array of one or more fins 62 that are closest or proximate to the blades. Being relatively stiffer, fin(s) 60 can function to effectively remove excess shaving preparation prior to engagement of fin(s) 62 and blades 18. The relatively greater pliability/flexibility of fin(s) 62 then can allow for fin(s) 62 to effectively stimulate and/or stretch the skin to prepare it for blade passage. If excess shaving preparation is not removed from the skin by fin(s) 60, then fin(s) 62 may be unable to contact the skin sufficiently to prepare the skin and hair for cutting.
There are a number of different execution approaches for making fin(s) 60 to be stiffer than fin(s) 62. For example, fin(s) 60 may have a different size and/or shape (e.g., a different base to tip height), have a different cross-sectional profile, have a different material mass, or be made from a different material in comparison to fin(s) 62. In one embodiment, fin(s) 60 have a base to tip height dimension that is at least 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, or 80% shorter than that of fin(s) 62. Another approach that may increase directional stiffness of one or more fins is to significantly vary the opposing sidewall lengths of the fins. With reference to fins 44j and 44k in
With reference to
The dimensions and values disclosed herein are not to be understood as being strictly limited to the exact numerical values recited. Instead, unless otherwise specified, each such dimension is intended to mean both the recited value and a functionally equivalent range surrounding that value. For example, a dimension disclosed as “40 mm” is intended to mean “about 40 mm ”
Every document cited herein, including any cross referenced or related patent or application is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety unless expressly excluded or otherwise limited. The citation of any document is not an admission that it is prior art with respect to any invention disclosed or claimed herein or that it alone, or in any combination with any other reference or references, teaches, suggests or discloses any such invention. Further, to the extent that any meaning or definition of a term in this document conflicts with any meaning or definition of the same term in a document incorporated by reference, the meaning or definition assigned to that term in this document shall govern.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of this invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional application No. 61/187,840, filed on Jun. 11, 2009.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61187840 | Jun 2009 | US |