The present application relates to gas turbine engines and more particularly to improvements in a method and an arrangement for tuning/detuning a rotor blade array.
Gas turbine rotor assemblies rotate at extreme speeds. Inadvertent excitation of resonant frequencies by the spinning rotor can cause an unwanted dynamic response in the engine, and hence it is desirable to be able to tune, or mistune, the rotor in order to avoid specific frequencies or to lessen their effect.
In accordance with a general aspect, there is provided a method of tuning a bladed rotor in a gas turbine engine, wherein the bladed rotor includes a circumferential array of blades extending from a rotor hub, each blade having an airfoil extending from a blade platform; the method comprising: providing a platform projection depending from every second blade, the platform projections together forming a circumferentially interrupted rib on the hub, and tuning the bladed rotor by adding or removing mass from at least one platform projection to alter the natural frequency of the rotor.
In accordance with another aspect, there is provided a bladed rotor for a gas turbine engine, the bladed rotor comprising a hub and a circumferential array of blades extending from the hub; each blade having an airfoil extending from a gaspath side of a platform provided at a periphery of the hub; and an annular array of projections depending from an interior side of the blade platform at circumferential locations generally corresponding to every second blade, the projections cooperating to form a circumferentially interrupted rib, the interrupted rib configured to provide a desired frequency response to the bladed rotor.
In accordance with a further general aspect, there is provided a method of tuning a bladed rotor for a gas turbine engine, the bladed rotor including a rotor hub having a circumferential array of airfoil blades extending therefrom, the hub having a gas path side defining a portion of the gas path in which the bladed assembly is to be mounted and an interior side opposite the gas path side; the method comprising: providing at least one projection extending from the rotor hub interior side, determining a frequency response of the bladed assembly in an as-manufactured condition, determining a desired frequency response, and then modifying the at least one projection to provide the bladed assembly with the desired frequency response.
Reference is now made to the accompanying figures in which:
The fan 12, the high pressure compressor 18, the high pressure turbine 20 and the low pressure turbine 14, for the purposes of the present description include rotors represented by the blades 30 in
The rotors, especially the fan 12, may be provided in the form of blisks, that is, in the form of integrally bladed disks (IBR). As shown in
As shown in
If the airfoils 32 of two adjacent blades 30 have the same natural frequency, one may mistune the blade 30 to which a projection 36 is dependent so that the frequency of the respective airfoil 32 will be mismatched to the frequency of the airfoil 32 on the adjacent blade 30.
The projections 36 may be tuned or mistuned by removing material therefrom thereby altering the mass thereof, causing the respective airfoil 32 to be modified in terms of its frequency. Alternately, material can be added to the projection 36 by a bonding process like welding. A projection 36 or similar rib features depending from the blade platform may be in this manner used to control blade frequencies.
The array of projections 36 are shown as being located at the leading edge of the platform 34a but it is understood that the array of projections 36 may be located at the trailing edge or other suitable location on the platform 34a. The shape of the projections 36 making up the array may be identical forming a regular shaped rib albeit interrupted.
It can be appreciated that a gas turbine engine rotor may be tuned by providing at least one projection extending from a platform interior side, determining a frequency response of the bladed rotor in an as-manufactured condition, determining a desired frequency response, and then modifying the at least one projection to provide the bladed rotor with the desired frequency response. Modifying the at least one projection may be done by removing material from the projection or by adding material thereto.
The material addition (i.e. the projections 36) on the disk provides a convenient way of changing the blade frequencies. The projections 36 may be used to tune or mistune the blades (where frequencies of adjacent blades are different) to provide the bladed rotor with the desired frequency response.
The above description is meant to be exemplary only, and one skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention disclosed. For instance, it will be understood that he present teaching may be applied to any bladed rotor assembly, including but not limited to fan and compressor rotors, and may likewise be applied to any suitable rotor configuration, such as integrally bladed rotors, conventional bladed rotors etc. Any modifications which fall within the scope of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of a review of this disclosure, and such modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/313,485, filed Dec. 7, 2011 which claims priority on U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/420,927 filed on Dec. 8, 2010, the content of both applications being hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4097192 | Kulina | Jun 1978 | A |
4361213 | Landis, Jr. et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4879792 | O'Connor | Nov 1989 | A |
5160242 | Brown | Nov 1992 | A |
5286168 | Smith | Feb 1994 | A |
5373922 | Marra | Dec 1994 | A |
5582077 | Agram et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
6354780 | Davis | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6405434 | Landolt et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6854959 | Barb | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7024744 | Martin et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7069654 | Robbins | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7252481 | Stone | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7347672 | Bertrand et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
20100074752 | Denis | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2596805 | Aug 2006 | CA |
1188900 | Mar 2002 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Office Action received in counterpart Canadian application No. 2,761,208 dated Sep. 29, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170097016 A1 | Apr 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61420927 | Dec 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13313485 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 15202934 | US |