1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to gas turbine engines and, more particularly, to blade and disk interfaces of such engines.
2. Background Art
Fan rotors can be manufactured integrally or as an assembly of blades around a disk. In the case where the rotor is assembled, the fixation between each blade and the disk has to provide retention against extremely high radial loads. This in turn causes high radial stress in the disk retaining the blades.
In the case of “swept” fans, the blades are asymmetric with respect to their radial axis. A significant portion of the weight of these blades is cantilevered over the front portion of the fixation, which causes an uneven axial distribution of the radial load on the fixation and disk. This load distribution causes high local radial stress in the front of the disk and high contact forces between the blade and the front of the disk.
Although a number of solutions have been provided to even axial distribution of stress in blades, such as grooves in blade platforms to alleviate thermal and/or mechanical stresses, these solutions do not address the problem of high local radial stress in the disk supporting the blades.
Some solutions have also been provided to reduce the increase of contact stress resulting in a non-zero broach angle of the blade, including the elimination of diagonally opposite portions of the load transfer interface which are less stressed. However, such solutions are not applicable to reduce the increased local contact stress produced by the asymmetry of “swept” fans. In addition, such solutions do not address the problem of high local radial stress in the disk supporting the blades.
Accordingly, there is a need for a blade and disk interface for a gas turbine engine fan producing reduced local contact stress and reduced local radial stress in the disk.
It is a general aim of the present invention to provide an improved blade and disk interface for a gas turbine engine.
It is also an aim of the present invention to provide a method for reducing a local contact stress between a disk and a blade.
It is a further aim of the present invention to provide a method for reducing a local radial stress in a bladed rotor disk assembly.
Therefore, in accordance with a general aspect of the present invention, there is provided a gas turbine engine rotor assembly comprising a rotor disk having a plurality of blade mounting slots circumferentially distributed about a periphery thereof for receiving complementary blade fixing portions of rotor blades, each of said blade mounting slots being bounded by a pair of opposed sidewalls extending longitudinally from a front side to a rear side of the rotor disk, and wherein a localized lateral play is provided between the sidewalls of each slot and the blade fixing portion of a respective one of the rotor blades along a longitudinal portion where contact stress is known to be maximal, said longitudinal portion being smaller than a length of the blade mounting slot and the blade fixing portion. In accordance with another feature of the present invention, the localized lateral play is at least partty provided by a region of reduced width in the blade fixing portion.
In accordance with a further general aspect of the present invention, there is provided a gas turbine engine rotor blade mountable in a blade retaining slot of a rotor disk, the rotor blade comprises a platform, an airfoil portion extending upwardly from said platform, a root depending downwardly from said platform and adapted for engagement in the blade retaining slot of the rotor disk, said root having a length extending from a front side to a rear side of the root, and wherein the root has a localized reduced width along a portion of the length thereof in a region where contact stress between the root and the slot is known to be high.
In accordance with a further general aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for reducing high local stress transfer between a gas turbine engine blade fixing and a blade mounting slot of a rotor disk, the method comprising the steps of: a) determining which portion of a full length of the blade fixing and the blade mounting slot is subject to maximal contact stresses, and b) providing a mismatch fit in said portion of maximal stress.
Reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, showing by way of illustration a preferred embodiment of the present invention and in which:
Referring to
Referring to
As stated above, the asymmetry of the blade 32 causes a significant portion of the blade weight to be cantilevered over the front portion of the dovetail 44. This creates an uneven axial distribution of the radial load on the dovetail 44 and disk 30. Such a load distribution produces unacceptably high local radial stress in the front of the disk 30 and contact stress between the dovetail 44 and the front of the dovetail groove 46. Each airfoil portion 34 has a center of gravity which is offset axially forwardly relative to the center of the blade fixing portion 44. The blades are forward swept.
Referring to
In a preferred embodiment, the thickness difference between the narrow front portion of the dovetail 44 and the remainder of the dovetail 44 is approximately 0.010 inches.
It understood that the localized mismatch 50 can be created in alternative ways, such as by increasing the width of the dovetail groove 46 at the front while keeping the section of the dovetail 44 constant. The mismatch 50 can also be similarly created in alternative attachments such as bottom root profiles commonly known as “fir tree” engaging a similarly shaped groove in the disk 30.
The mismatch 50 thus eliminates the unacceptably high local radial stress in the front of the disk 30 and contact forces between the dovetail 44 and the front of the dovetail groove 46 by minimizing or avoiding contact between the dovetail 44 and dovetail groove 46 in the region where the stress is maximal.
The embodiments of the invention described above are intended to be exemplary. Those skilled in the art will therefore appreciate that the foregoing description is illustrative only, and that various alternatives and modifications can be devised without departing from the spirit of the present invention. Accordingly, the present is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variances which fall within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3572970 | Smuland | Mar 1971 | A |
3832092 | Manharth | Aug 1974 | A |
5135354 | Novotny | Aug 1992 | A |
5141401 | Juenger et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5160242 | Brown | Nov 1992 | A |
5310318 | Lammas et al. | May 1994 | A |
5395213 | Stenneler | Mar 1995 | A |
5443365 | Ingling et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5567116 | Bourcier | Oct 1996 | A |
6019580 | Barr et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033185 | Lammas et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6065938 | Bartsch | May 2000 | A |
6183202 | Ganshaw | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6244822 | Sinclair et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6375429 | Halila et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6435833 | Reluzco et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6435834 | Reluzco et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6439851 | Wong | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6592330 | Lecke et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
20040076523 | Sinha et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 411 208 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1 433 959 | Jun 2004 | EP |
63-134804 | Jun 1988 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050254953 A1 | Nov 2005 | US |