The present disclosure relates to table saw attachments designed to improve safety and performance. More specifically, this disclosure relates to blade guards with hold-down capability, splitters, and anti-kickback devices.
A table saw is a power tool used to cut a workpiece to a desired size or shape. A table saw includes a work surface or table and a circular blade extending up through the table. A person uses a table saw by holding a piece of wood or other workpiece on the table and feeding it past the spinning blade to make a cut. Sometimes the workpiece will climb or rise up on the blade, creating a safety hazard that can result in the workpiece shifting unexpectedly or being kicked back or propelled by the blade toward the user. A user may inadvertently contact the spinning blade while trying to reposition the workpiece or as a result of the workpiece shifting or kicking back. The blade guard disclosed in this document provides a configuration that holds the workpiece down as the workpiece approaches the blade and as it is being cut to minimize the workpiece from climbing on the blade.
The disclosed blade guard also includes structure to substantially enclose the blade and protect against contact with the blade, a splitter or spreader to keep a workpiece from shifting sideways and catching on the rear edge of the blade, and an anti-kickback device such as a set of anti-kickback pawls configured to oppose a workpiece being thrown back toward a user. In one configuration, the blade guard also provides a block to prevent workpieces from contacting the blade if the workpieces are too high or thick to freely pass under the anti-kickback pawls or under any other structure associated with the blade guard and/or splitter.
In the exemplary embodiment shown in
The forward end of the top guard includes a nose or tip 27 that slopes down toward table 12. When the top guard is mounted on the splitter in the configuration shown in
In the exemplary embodiment shown in
To form nose 27, the front of the top surface curves down and tapers inward along the sides. The taper on the left side allows the blade guard to tilt to forty-five degrees without interfering with the table and the taper is mirrored on the right side to be aesthetically pleasing. The sides taper moving down as if coming to a point but instead of forming a point the sides are clipped off near the bottom so that the tip 46 of the nose is flat or cut straight across. Side walls 50 of the top guard meet the edges of the top surface as it curves down to give support to the nose and follow the curved surface gradually tapering off a little over half way down the nose. The nose extends down about one-and-one-half inches from the top of the top guard, ending anywhere from zero to about three-eighths of an inch above the top of the blade when the guard is installed on the splitter. As stated, the nose acts like a stop to prevent workpieces that are too thick from moving in toward the blade and splitter.
Side walls 50 extend down from the top surface as shown and have three steps or indentations moving from the nose towards the rear. These indentations allow the side guards to run alongside the side walls and overlap each other, as shown in
Side guards 24 hang down from top guard 22, as shown in
The side guards hang down from both the right and left sides of the top guard to shield each side of the blade. In the depicted embodiment, there are three side guards on each side, although there could be more. The side guards on the right side include front side guard 28, middle side guard 30 and rear side guard 32. The side guards on the left side are mirror images of those on the right side, and they include front side guard 34, middle side guard 36 and rear side guard 38. Each side guard is generally flat with a rim around the edge and has a somewhat triangular shape. In order to shield the teeth of the blade, the front side guards are larger than the middle side guards which are in turn larger than the rear side guards. The side guards are pivotally attached to the top guard by press-fit rivets 68 and, as stated, are free to pivot. The side guards are positioned so that they overlap slightly when they hang down. They are also positioned so that they do not catch on one another when they pivot. The rear side guard is seated farthest inward, next is the middle side guard, and finally, the front side guard which is seated farthest to the outside, as can be seen in
The side guards are generally triangularly shaped, as mentioned, with the smallest angle, roughly thirty degrees, formed at the top between two long straight sides—side 70 which faces the front of the side guard, and side 72 which faces the rear of the side guard, as shown in
The bottom portions of the side guards are different for the front, middle and rear side guards in order to provide the desired blade coverage. The front side guard is like a triangle with each bottom corner clipped off, and with the corner that faces the rear clipped off more than the other bottom corner. The clipped corners are replaced by straight segments 80 and 82, and a straight bottom segment 84 runs between them, as shown in
The middle side guard 36, shown in
The rear side guard 38, shown in
As mentioned, the side guards are pivotally attached to the top guard by press-fit rivets 68. Each rivet is pressed into a hole 108 in a boss 110 on the outside of each side guard near the top of each side guard under rounded corner 78 (the holes and bosses are labeled in
Surfaces 122 on the outer edge of segments 74 of each side guard face the front of the top guard and act, in conjunction with vertical surfaces 54 on the top guard, as stops. When the side guards hang down without contacting a workpiece or the saw table, surfaces 122 contact vertical surfaces 54 and keep the side guards in a position where sides 70 slope back, as shown in
In order for the side guards to pivot back smoothly and reliably, the side guards are designed so that the point of contact between the bottom of each side guard and the surface of the table is positioned to the rear of the rivet attaching the side guard to the top guard. The farther back the contact point is from the pivot point the more easily the side guard pivots back. However, if the front edge of the front side guards (i.e., sides 70) in the depicted embodiment were to run from near the rivet to the point of contact with the table, in some positions the front side guard would not adequately cover the teeth of the blade from the sides. Accordingly, front side 70 of the front side guards runs from near the rivet down to a first corner point 126 that is forward of a second corner point 128 between segments 82 and 84, as shown in
Top Guard 22 is mounted on splitter 26, as shown in
Top guard 22 attaches to splitter 26 in such a way that it is held securely in place when in its operable position, but is also quickly and easily installed or removed by hand without the need of tools and without the need of moving a bail or lever. A user might remove the top guard for some cutting operations, and therefore, being able to install and remove the top guard quickly and easily facilitates guard usage and makes it more likely that a user will re-install the top guard after removing it.
In the depicted embodiment, a user removes the top guard from the splitter by first pulling the top guard forward or toward the front of the saw, and then rotating the top guard upward to a substantially vertical position. Once the top guard is in a substantially vertical position it can be lifted up and away from the splitter, as shown in
A latch mechanism by which the top guard is held on the splitter consists of a bolt 142, two pins 144 and 146, and two coil springs 148, one spring on each side of the top guard. Bolt 142 is located toward the rear and along the bottom of the top guard, as shown in
To install the top guard on the splitter, the top guard is first oriented substantially vertically with spacer 154 positioned above a cutout 172 in the splitter. Cutout 172 is shaped somewhat like the letter “J”, as shown in
Positioning cutouts 172 and 180 a relatively large distance apart, having splitter 26 extend into gap 150 in the top guard, and sizing gap 150 so that projections 62 contact the sides of the splitter, allows the top guard to be attached or mounted securely to the splitter without any significant side-to-side play in the top guard. Also with this configuration, a user can release or remove the top guard from the splitter by pulling the top guard forward to stretch springs 148 until pin 146 clears notch 181. The user can then pivot the top guard upward until pin 144 clears notch 174, and then the user can lift the top guard up and away from the splitter, as described. This can all be done without using any tool and without having to move a locking bail or lever.
Additionally, the user can pivot the top guard up to a generally vertical position while pin 166 remains in cutout 172, as shown in
The configuration of the top guard described thus far allows a workpiece to pass under the top guard with only the bottom edges of the side guards contacting the workpiece. With this configuration the top guard is above the blade and there is a gap between the top of the blade and the bottom of the top guard. This configuration provides the maximum possible depth of cut while using the top guard. However, with this configuration a workpiece may also shift or climb the blade unexpectedly, which can result in a dangerous condition such as kickback. To address this issue, top guard 22 can be flipped over to hold down the workpiece.
In the hold-down position a workpiece can be guided into the blade with more control since the top guard helps hold the workpiece down. This is particularly helpful when cutting sheet goods such as 4′×8′ plywood sheets which can flex and climb the blade, and which can be difficult for a person to handle and feed into the saw without shifting.
The top guard includes a hollow area 64, shown in
When the top guard is turned over for the hold-down configuration, side guards 24 pivot around so that they continue to hang down from the top guard and shield the teeth of the blade. The side guards function as in the non-hold-down configuration discussed above, although side edges 72 face forward instead of sides 70. Additionally, surfaces 124 on the side guards abut surfaces 54 on the top guard to hold the side guards at an angle, instead of surfaces 122. As stated, in the depicted embodiment the top guard is designed to slope down when in the hold-down position so that the lowest point on the top guard is at the bottom of the nose, thus reducing the chance of binding occurring between the workpiece and the top guard as the workpiece moves past the blade. The shapes of the side guards are determined experimentally to achieve the desired blade coverage whether the guard is in a hold-down or non-hold-down position. The guard may quickly and easily be removed or installed from a hold-down position in the same way as it can be removed or installed from the non-hold-down position described earlier. The ability of the blade guard described herein to be quickly and easily changed from a non-hold-down position to a hold-down position without the use of tools and without having to move a bail or lever is a significant advantage over other blade guards.
Blade guard 20 also includes a pair of anti-kickback pawls 182, as shown in
Sometimes a workpiece may be soft or have a surface prone to scratching, or the anti-kickback pawls may be biased down with enough force to scratch or leave visible impressions on the surface of the workpiece. If the anti-kickback pawls cannot be easily removed or disabled, the user might remove the entire blade guard or permanently remove the anti-kickback pawls to avoid scratching the workpieces. To address this situation, anti-kickback pawls 182 are designed in such a way that they can either be rotated up into a position that holds them out of the way or they can be easily removed and re-installed without the use of tools.
Spring 184 stretches over bushing 190 so that straight segments 206 lie against the front of the wider sections 194 of bushing 190 and straight segments 208 lie against the back side of sections 194. Corners 209 catch the back sides of each anti-kickback pawl and, as stated, each end 210 is inserted into a hole 212 in each anti-kickback pawl. Each hole 212 is positioned on an anti-kickback pawl so that the triangle formed by hole 212 and the point of contact between straight segment 206 and bushing 190 and the point of contact between straight segment 208 and bushing 190 keeps spring 184 in tension stretched over bushing 190 and holds the anti-kickback pawl assembly together as a unit.
As shown in
To re-install the anti-kickback pawl assembly, loop 202 is fitted over extension 214 and center groove 218 of bushing 190 is positioned over the top edge of the splitter. Bolt 186 is then pulled back, stretching spring 184, and moved into cutout 222 through opening 224. The top and bottom edges of extension 214 and cutout 222 are rounded to facilitate movement of the bushing into the cutout. The bolt is then released and spring 184 pulls the bolt into notch 220 and the remaining tension in the spring holds the anti-kickback assembly in place.
In normal operation, spring 184 pulls the anti-kickback pawls down and forward until the front edge of each anti-kickback pawl contacts a pawl stop 228 on the splitter. Pawl stop 228 consists of a small metal cylinder press-fit into the splitter. When a piece of wood, or other workpiece, passes through the blade guard, the anti-kickback pawls rotate back so that the bottom of the pawls ride gently on the surface of the workpiece. As the anti-kickback pawls rotate back, the distance between notch 216 at the top of splitter 26 around which the loop 202 of spring 184 is anchored, and holes 212 through which the ends 210 of spring 184 pass in the anti-kickback pawls, increases and spring 184 is stretched. The resulting tension in the spring creates the restoring force that causes the anti-kickback pawls to rotate forward again after the workpiece leaves the blade guard. However, because coils 204 are not fixed, the top of spring 184 is able to pivot upwards about notch 216 and towards the front of the blade guard as spring 184 is stretched thus reducing the tension in the spring from what it would have been if coils 204 were fixed. That is, because of the geometry of the spring, the distance between notch 216 (which may also be referred to as an anchor point) and holes 212 is less as the anti-kickback pawls rotate back than it would have been if coils 204 were held at a fixed position and holes 212 were at a set distance from the fixed position of the coil. This results in a reduced restoring force by the spring. Not only is the restoring force reduced for this configuration but the difference is greater the more the anti-kickback pawls rotate back. A reduced restoring force helps to minimize marks or visible impressions that the tips of the anti-kickback pawls might otherwise leave on workpieces.
The geometry of spring 184 also allows the anti-kickback pawls to be easily disabled simply by rotating the pawls upward to a stable position. When the anti-kickback pawls are rotated back, the tension in the spring increases as the distance between anchor point 216 and each hole 212 increases, and reaches its maximum when anchor point 216 and hole 212 are in line with pivot axis 230 at the center of bolt 186 when viewed from the side, as shown in
The blade guards with hold-down capability, splitters, and anti-kickback devices disclosed herein are applicable to woodworking power tool equipment, and particularly to table saws.
It is believed that the disclosure set forth above encompasses multiple distinct inventions with independent utility. While each of these inventions has been disclosed in its preferred form, the specific embodiments thereof as disclosed and illustrated herein are not to be considered in a limiting sense as numerous variations are possible. The subject matter of the inventions includes all novel and non-obvious combinations and sub-combinations of the various elements, features, functions and/or properties disclosed herein. No single feature, function, element or property of the disclosed embodiments is essential to all of the disclosed inventions. Similarly, the recitation of “a” or “a first” element, or the equivalent thereof, should be understood to include incorporation of one or more such elements, neither requiring nor excluding two or more such elements.
It is believed that the following claims particularly point out certain combinations and sub-combinations that are directed to disclosed inventions and are novel and non-obvious. Inventions embodied in other combinations and sub-combinations of features, functions, elements and/or properties may be claimed through amendment of the present claims or presentation of new claims in this or a related application. Such amended or new claims, whether they are directed to a different invention or directed to the same invention, whether different, broader, narrower or equal in scope to the original claims, are also regarded as included within the subject matter of the inventions of the present disclosure.
This application claims the benefit of and priority from the following U.S. Provisional Patent Application, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference: Ser. No. 61/463,557, filed Feb. 17, 2011.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
162814 | Graves et al. | May 1875 | A |
264412 | Kuhlmann | Sep 1882 | A |
299480 | Kuhlman et al. | May 1884 | A |
307112 | Groff | Oct 1884 | A |
545504 | Hoover | Sep 1895 | A |
713196 | Bennett | Nov 1902 | A |
997720 | Troupenat | Jul 1911 | A |
1037843 | Ackley | Sep 1912 | A |
1082870 | Humason | Dec 1913 | A |
1148169 | Howe | Jul 1915 | A |
1244187 | Frisbie | Oct 1917 | A |
1496212 | French | Jun 1924 | A |
1511797 | Berghold | Oct 1924 | A |
1552553 | Georgia | Sep 1925 | A |
1563317 | Auel | Dec 1925 | A |
1774521 | Neighbour | Sep 1930 | A |
2007887 | Tautz | Jul 1935 | A |
2075282 | Hedgpeth | Mar 1937 | A |
2095330 | Hedgpeth | Oct 1937 | A |
2121069 | Collins | Jun 1938 | A |
2352235 | Tautz | Jun 1944 | A |
2466325 | Ocenasek | Apr 1949 | A |
2572326 | Evans | Oct 1951 | A |
2593596 | Olson | Apr 1952 | A |
3808932 | Russell | May 1974 | A |
3880032 | Green | Apr 1975 | A |
4453112 | Sauer et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4721023 | Bartlett et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
5116249 | Shiotani et al. | May 1992 | A |
5123317 | Barnes, Jr. et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5230269 | Shiotani et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5231906 | Kogej | Aug 1993 | A |
5857507 | Puzio et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6131629 | Puzio et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6736042 | Behne et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6796208 | Jorgensen | Sep 2004 | B1 |
7000515 | Jorgensen | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7437981 | Burke et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
20010035081 | Sutton | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020117037 | Satori | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040226424 | O'Banion et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040255745 | Peot et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050235793 | O'Banion et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20070000366 | Peot et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070056416 | Shibata | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070113714 | Burke et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070113715 | Burke et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070163408 | Buck et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070186739 | Peot et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186741 | Buck et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070277661 | Domeny et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080022827 | Weir et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090044673 | Liu et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100147125 | Stellman | Jun 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3137732 | Sep 1983 | DE |
8807584 | Sep 1988 | DE |
4205965 | Jul 1993 | DE |
9306198 | Aug 1993 | DE |
WO 03006213 | Jan 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
The INCA Woodworking Machinery Handbook—With Useful Tips and Jigs for Everyone, INCA Maschinen, 1984. |
SI16WA-WF Circular Saw with Tilting Blade Spare Parts Catalogue, SCMI Corporation, Norcross, GA, Nov. 1986 and 1991. |
Inca 2200 Table Saw Photo of Internal Mechanisms, around 1992. |
Inca 2100SE Blade Guard Photos, 1992. |
Inca 2100SE Professional Tablesaw Owners Manual, Injecta Machinery, 1992. |
Skil Model 3400-Type 1 10″ Table Saw Parts List and Technical Bulletin, S-B Power Tool Company, Jun. 1993. |
SI320 Circular with Tilting Blade Spare Parts Catalogue, SCM, Dec. 23, 1998. |
SI3200/3800 Circular with Tilting Blade Spare Parts Catalogue, SCM, Dec. 23, 1998. |
Grizzly Industrial, Inc. Heavy-Duty 12″ Table Saw Model G5959 and G9957 Parts List, 1998 and Oct. 2001. |
Altendorf publication, Wilhelm Altendorf GmbH & Co. KG, Minden, Germany, 1999. |
SI300N Circular with Tilting Blade Spare Parts Catalogue, SCM, Jun. 12, 2000. |
Bosch Model 4000 Worksite Table Saw Operating/Safety Instructions, S-B Power Tool Company, Jul. 2000. |
Two photographs of a saw displayed at a trade show on Aug. 23, 2000. |
SI400N Circular with Tilting Blade Spare Parts Catalogue, SCM, Sep. 19, 2000. |
DeWalt Woodworker's Table Saw DW746 Instruction Manual, DeWalt Industrial Tool Co., 2000. |
SC 3W Circular Saw Manual, SCM Group S.p.A Divisione Minimax—Samco, Feb. 2001. |
Ryobi 10″ Table Saw BT3000 Operator's Manual, Ryobi Technologies, Inc., Mar. 2001. |
SI450E Circular with Tilting Blade Spare Parts Catalogue, SCM, Apr. 26, 2001. |
Bosch 10″ Table Saw Model 0601476139 Parts List and Technical Bulletin, S-B Power Tool Company, Apr. 2001. |
Powermatic 10″ Tilting Arbor Saw Model 66 Instruction Manual & Parts List, JET Equipment & Tools, Jun. 2001. |
Skil Model 3400 Table Saw Operating/Safety Instructions, S-B Power Tool Co., Sep. 2001. |
Tablesaw Splitters and Blade Covers, Fine Woodworking, pp. 77-81, Dec. 2001. |
The Merlin Splitter by Excalibur a Sommerville Design Product Overview & Generic Installation Notes, Sommerville Design & Manufacturing Inc., at least as early as 2002. |
Ryobi 10″ Table Saw BT3100 Operator's Manual, Ryobi Technologies, Inc., Aug. 2002. |
Rojek KPF 300A-xxxx-RN-1P3 Table Saw/Shaper Combination Machine specification sheet, Sep. 30, 2002. |
Laguna Tools Signature Series by Knapp, Oct. 21, 2002. |
Rojek Circular Saw PK 300 Spare part catalogue, Apr. 14, 2003. |
Ridgid TS3650 Operators Manual 10″ Cast Iron Table Saw, May 2003, Jun. 2003 and Jul. 15, 2003. |
Porter-Cable Double Insulated 10″ Bench Top Table Saw Instruction Manual, Porter-Cable Corporation, Sep. 15, 2003. |
SI300S-S1300S4 Circular with Tilting Blade Spare Parts Catalogue, SCM, Oct. 30, 2003. |
Delta Biesemeyer 10″ Table Saw Blade Guard Systems Instruction Manual, Delta Machinery, May 9, 2005. |
Powermatic WMH Tool Group Operating Instructions and Parts Manual 10-inch Cabinet Saw Model 2000, Nov. 2005. |
Makita Model 2704 Exploded Drawings and Parts List, Nov. 2005. |
Porter-Cable 10″ Portable Table Saw 3812, Porter-Cable Corporation, 2005. |
Porter Cable 10″ Portable Table Saw Model 3812 Parts List with Guard Exploded View, 2005. |
Grizzly Industrial, Inc. Model G0605X/G0606X Extreme Series 12″ Table Saw Owner's Manual, Grizzly Industrial, Inc., Oct. 2006. |
Riving Knives—Not Just for The Europeans Anymore, Popular Woodworking, Jul. 20, 2007. |
WoodNet Forums Woodworking Talk Forum, posting dated Jan. 9, 2008. |
Grizzly Industrial, Inc. Model G0651/G0652 10″ Extreme Series Table Saws Owner's Manual, Grizzly Industrial, Inc., Mar. 2008. |
SCM SI 450 Circular saw with tilting blade product brochure, Villa Verucchio, Italy, undated. |
SCM Group publication, Rimini, Italy, undated. |
Makita Table Saw 2704 Instruction Manual, Makita Corporation of America, date unknown. |
Laguna Tools table saw owner's manual, date unknown. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120216665 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61463557 | Feb 2011 | US |