The invention relates to a blade-like stem of a hip joint prosthesis for anchoring in the femur, having a portion comprising a prosthesis neck and a femur-anchoring portion tapering towards a distal end.
A blade-like stem generally known in the art is described in EP 0 240 815 B1. A stem corresponding generally to
The lateral narrow side 8 widens out of the conical widened portion to form a trochanter wing 9 before merging, via a shoulder of the stem blade or anchoring portion, into the prosthesis neck termination plane.
In both cases, a stem-receiving space, that is to say a corresponding cavity, has to be provided beforehand in the femur, that being effected by means of a shaping instrument, especially a rasp, corresponding to the shape of the stem. Such shaping instruments or rasps correspond exactly to the geometry of the stem in question or differ specifically therefrom in order to obtain a predetermined undersize for a press-fit or a predetermined oversize as space for a cement mantle.
Once the hip joint has been opened and the neck of the femur resectioned, in the proximal femur the bony bearing is prepared for receiving the anchoring stem. According to the shape of the stem, the bony anchoring bed is created using a suitable shaping instrument, especially a rasp, by movement down along the stem axis. For moving down into the medullary space, which is filled with spongy bone and soft tissue, the rasp is driven forwards by means of a weight acting as a hammer or using some other suitable instrument. In the case of a curved stem axis, the shaping instrument or rasp is moved down in an arc along a curved path, while in the case of a straight stem axis the rasp is driven forward along a straight line corresponding substantially to the axis of the proximal medullary space.
For cementless anchoring of hip stems, the configuration of the anchoring portion as a straight stem has proved especially suitable clinically. This concept allows a secure implantation technique, high primary stability and good ingrowth behavior. The current surgical techniques for such stems generally require the medullary space to be opened not only in the plane of the resection surface of the neck of the femur, but also further laterally into the region of the greater trochanter. Reference is made in this respect to
More recently, there has been an increase in implantations of joint endoprostheses carried out using minimally invasive surgical techniques. The aim of such techniques is more rapid rehabilitation of the patient, which is associated with a reduction in pain and a shorter stay in hospital. Minimally invasive surgical techniques keep operative trauma, especially in respect of the functionally significant structures, to a very low level. For the functioning of the hip joint the important structural features are the muscles and tendons. The aim of minimally invasive implantation techniques is inter alia to avoid resections and detachments of tendon and muscle insertions in the region of the greater trochanter. Classic straight stems accordingly have disadvantages for the use of minimally invasive techniques.
To avoid resections in the region of the tendon insertions on the greater trochanter, in the case of straight stems the lateral area can be chamfered in the region of the trochanter. Straight stems having a flattened shoulder have been proposed. An example is the so-called Muller straight stem shown and described in “Technique d'implantation de protheses totales de Muller par voie laterale transgluteale”, Encyclopedie Medico-Chirurgicale (Paris) 44666, 1991.
The aim of that flattened shoulder is to avoid major defects in the region of the ridge of the trochanter. When shaping that flattened portion, a proportion of the lateral stem area, which proportion is constant within the size system, was generally configured with straight shaping inclined relative to the stem axis or with a radius. The rasp corresponding to the implant was generally made geometrically identical to the implant. From the technical standpoint, the rasp is used to create an undercut in the region of the greater trochanter, as can be seen in
In the case of implantation of a hip stem, the bony bed is shaped using rasps of increasing size up to the size giving the best fit, the rasp in question following the shape of the existing bed formed by the preceding rasp size. Because the distal portion of the straight stem is affected by moving down along a straight axis, compromises are made in terms of exact fit in respect of the inclined or curved shoulder area. That is influenced, however, by the surgeon's rasp technique and individual bone quality.
The present invention, described below, comprises a stem typically used for cementless anchoring in the femur. In principle, however, the present invention described below is intended to also relate, for example, to cemented stems as well as other stems.
Improving upon the above-mentioned prior art, one aim of the present invention is to provide a blade-like stem of the kind mentioned at the beginning that is especially suitable for minimally invasive surgical techniques. In so doing, the advantages of conventional straight stem implants should generally be retained, but muscle and tendon insertions should be protected as much as possible.
That problem is solved according to one embodiment of the invention as follows: the lateral narrow side of the stem comprises a distal straight portion and a proximal arcuate portion, the straight portion extending over a length of from 60% to 75% of the total length of the stem.
A preferred shape of the convex proximal arcuate portion of a shaft stem comprises an arcuate portion that can be in the form of a “tractrix,” which is described or defined by the proximal end of the lateral narrow side of the stem on introduction thereof (or of a corresponding rasp) into a complementary cavity in the femur while the contact between the lateral-distal and proximal-medial stem contour on the one hand and the associated boundary of the cavity on the other hand is maintained. The preferred shape of the proximal-lateral shoulder area is therefore derived from the guidance of the stem in the bony bed, as shown in
In principle, it would also be possible to continue the lateral-distal straight portion in the proximal region in accordance with
Also with reference to
As already mentioned above, it is especially advantageous for the lateral arcuate portion 11 to be in the form of a kind of “tractrix” which is described or defined by the proximal end of the lateral narrow side of the stem 10 on introduction thereof into a complementary cavity in the femur while the contact between the lateral-distal and proximal-medial stem contour on the one hand and the associated boundary of the cavity on the other hand is maintained. In this respect reference is again made to
Depending upon the size of the stem and the external conditions, the proximal arcuate portion 11 is preferably configured with a constant, however especially continuously or discontinuously changing radius of between 200 mm and 500 mm.
It has also proved practical for the proximal arcuate portion 11 to be configured with a radius that becomes increasingly larger continuously or discontinuously from distal to proximal.
The arcuate portion 11 can especially also be in the form of a hyperbolic, parabolic or elliptical portion such that towards the distal end of the arcuate portion the portion in question merges into the conical straight portion 23 at a predetermined point at which the tangent forms with the stem axis 24 an angle equal to half the cone angle.
In connection with the stem itself, it should also be mentioned that the anchoring portion widens conically over the length of the lateral-distal straight portion 23 starting from the distal end 20 in the direction of its longitudinal axis 24 either all round or only laterally-medially.
It should also be mentioned that the cross-section of the stem 10 is preferably rectangular, but may also be trapezoidal or rhombic.
The mentioned all-round conical widening of the anchoring portion 21 has a cone angle of about from 0.5° to 6°, especially about from 1° to 3°. In some embodiments, the anchoring portion 21 can widen on only the ventral and/or dorsal side.
All the features disclosed in the application documents are claimed as being important to the invention, insofar as they are novel over the prior art individually or in combination.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2005 044 872 | Sep 2005 | DE | national |
10 2005 048 873 | Oct 2005 | DE | national |
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/067,635 filed Oct. 15, 2008 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,498,340 on Nov. 22, 2016, which is a U.S. National Phase of International PCT Application No. PCT/EP2006/007842 filed Aug. 8, 2006, which claims priority to German Patent Application No. 10 2005 044 872.0 filed Sep. 20, 2005 and German Patent Application No. 10 2005 048 873.0 filed Oct. 12, 2005, the contents of each application incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4279042 | Andriacchi et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4310931 | Muller | Jan 1982 | A |
4404693 | Zweymuller | Sep 1983 | A |
4753657 | Lee et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4908035 | Deckner | Mar 1990 | A |
5156627 | Amstutz | Oct 1992 | A |
5888210 | Draenert | Mar 1999 | A |
6168632 | Moser et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6383228 | Schmotzer | May 2002 | B1 |
6540788 | Zweymuller | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6613094 | Zweymuller | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6808539 | Zweymuller | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7004973 | Zweymuller | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7175668 | Zweymuller | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7497875 | Zweymuller | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7749278 | Frederick et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8337565 | Wunderle | Dec 2012 | B2 |
9498340 | Moser | Nov 2016 | B2 |
20050055103 | Badatcheff et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050267586 | Sidebotham | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060206212 | Zweymuller | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060276904 | Zweymuller | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0032165 | Jul 1981 | EP |
0145939 | Jun 1985 | EP |
2678510 | Jan 1993 | FR |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report; European Patent Office; International Application No. PCT/EP2006/007842; dated Nov. 7, 2006, 4 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; European Patent Office; International Application No. PCT/EP2006/007842; dated Mar. 20, 2008; 9 pages. |
Canadian Office Action; Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Canadian Patent Application No. 2,622,010; dated Oct. 17, 2012; 2 pages. |
English Translation of Notification of Reasons for Rejection regarding counterpart Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-530349; Japanese Patent Office; dated May 25, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170065421 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12067635 | US | |
Child | 15357502 | US |