This invention relates to flexible protective barriers which may be temporarily or permanently erected to protect buildings and occupants or other structures from the effects of high velocity winds or shock waves, with associated debris, resulting from explosive blasts.
The continuing increase in terrorist attacks which rely on explosives delivered by humans or vehicles, including cars, trucks, boats, and airplanes, into or adjacent to a target requires protective measures to be in place to diminish the number of casualties and minimize property damage. Since the U.S. embassy bombings, as well as the government building in Oklahoma City, and now the World Trade Center in New York, emphasis has been placed on creating an impassable perimeter around the buildings.
However, these perimeters interrupt or dislocate the normal ingress and egress of the buildings and result in a “bunker” attitude. For example, some airports now prohibit parking within 300 feet of the terminal building. There have been suggestions to close off Pennsylvania Avenue in front of the White House, one of the main corridors in downtown Washington, D.C., with concrete barriers.
At least one prevalent attitude suggests that if a free and open life style must be changed for protection, the terrorists have won. No doubt, new construction and new materials will address this new situation. But the vast majority of public buildings were built before this threat was recognized and should be retro-fitted for the current situation without giving up utility and convenience. Such retro-fitting must be done quickly and economically.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,076,168 to Yoshida et al discloses a shielding fabric sheet for blasting operations. The fabric is made of a polyethylene fiber with a tensile strength of about 15 g/d, a tensile modulus of about 400 g/d and a total denier of about 600 and a weight of about 130 g/m.supp.2. The fabric can be used alone or laminated with another mesh. The material is used to cover an area or surround and area to be explosively demolished to contain the by-products of an explosion.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,915,449 to Schwartz discloses a bomb blast curtain to be installed over windows inside a building. The curtain has a specific mounting structure and such dimensions that it will expand to respond to the over pressure of a blast and contain the broken glass. The burst strength of the fabric is approximately 110 lbs. and the weight is approximately 4.2 oz/linear yd.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,176,050 to Gower discloses a fabric hurricane barrier for protecting property against the effects of high winds and foreign objects carried by the wind. The material is made of polypropylene yarns with an interstice size as small as {fraction (3/16)}th inch to prevent passage of objects and a burst strength of about 675 lbs after an elongation of about 22%.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,298,766 to Mor discloses a protective apparatus for glass panels having a plurality of spaced slender tensile elements, much like vertical Venetian blinds, installed inside a room. The elements may be woven or solid and made from a variety of materials. The opposite ends of the elements are mounted on a frame that may be adjusted to provide a desired degree of tension to the elements. The elements contain the effects of a blast.
Each of the prior art devices must be deployed continuously to insure adequate protection and therefore, each restricts the utility of the protected building by closing off all or parts of the structure.
What is needed in the art is a system that provides continuous protection while permitting conventional use of the structure and can be installed quickly and economically.
Accordingly, it is an objective of the instant invention to teach the use of a flexible blast curtain with separate panels erected outside a building in such a manner to allow normal ingress and egress, as well as visibility.
It is a further objective of the instant invention to teach mounting the fabric panels on the protected building or on frames adjacent the building in an architecturally pleasing array. This invention does not have rigidity but rather is very flexible, which gives several positive features including allowing for ease of storage as by rolling or folding. The flexible barrier of the invention is placed a distance out from the surface to be protected. An impacting missile stretches the barrier until it decelerates to a stop or is deflected. The barrier material has a predetermined tensile strength and stretch that makes it suitable for this application. The known strength and stretch, together with the speed, weight and size of the impacting missile, all of which are given in test requirements, permit design calculation to ascertain barrier deflection at impact. This deflection is a determinate of the minimum distance that this barrier is to be spaced out from the frangible area to be protected. Other determinates which may be included are additional deflection from wind pressure and from slack from an improper installation.
The barrier of this invention is mounted farther away from the surface to be protected than the prior art structures, thereby providing room for a longer deceleration of impacting flying debris (missiles). Thus greater energy from a missile can be safely dissipated than is possible with the prior art structures, and the energy which can be safely dissipated is calculable.
The distance which the barrier is spaced out from the frangible surface need not be great and is quite workable with standard building design. Even though the distance is not great, said distance does allow a significantly increased distance and time of deceleration such that the barrier will stop far stronger impacts than with the heretofore known rigid devices. In simple terms, the missile is slowed to a stop by elasticity as the barrier stretches. The greater the impact, the greater the stretch. Thus the building is not subjected to an abrupt harsh blow as the impact on a barrier is transferred to the building. The energy transfer is much gentler and less destructive than with the rigid devices.
It is yet another objective of the instant invention to teach constructing and installing blast curtains quickly and inexpensively.
It is a still further objective of the invention to teach the use of an attachment system that will absorb and dissipate the over pressure or wind of a blast without damage to the curtain.
Other objects and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein are set forth, by way of illustration and example, certain embodiments of this invention. The drawings constitute a part of this specification and include exemplary embodiments of the present invention and illustrate various objects and features thereof.
The use of this invention allows very large areas with spans of greater than 25 feet to be covered with ease. Thus most window groupings, even several stories of a building, could be readily protected. This invention is light in weight, easy to use, does not require reinforcing bars, can be constructed in varying degrees of transparency, can be weather tight, is economical, and is capable of dissipating far greater forces without damage than mechanical barriers. Missiles striking this barrier make very little sound. Additionally, the blast curtain is suitable to be configured with the necessary motor and supportive devices for automatic deployment.
As shown in
The blast curtain 10 is mounted to the building in the area which affords the strongest connection between the curtain and the building. Where there is a structural overhang, the curtain may be mounted as shown in FIG. 1.
In
The panels are made of fabric and may have an adjustable porosity to enable some energy and light to pass through the curtain. This raises the total over pressure the curtain can survive and permits visibility through the curtain. The material of the curtain can withstand an over pressure of a least 700 psi. The attachment assembly is constructed to perform to the same standard. The curtain may be tailored to a particular strength by using multiple layers of fabric or different material constructions, including films and meshes. The fabrics could be made from polymers, such as polyethylene, polypropylene, etc., including Kevlar, or other high strength compositions, such as metals, and mixtures thereof. One embodiment allows an upwind pressure of 1″ of mercury, which roughly translates into a 100 mph wind, through at 250 cfm or approximately 3 mph. The amount of air passage depends on the interstice size.
In some instances because of the construction of the building and/or the physical layout of the plant, attachment to the building may be impractical. Therefore, the blast curtain 10 may be installed on frames 60, as shown in
It is to be understood that while a certain form of the invention is illustrated, it is not to be limited to the specific form or arrangement of parts herein described and shown. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes may be made without departing from the scope of the invention and the invention is not to be considered limited to what is shown and described in the specification and drawings.
This application is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 09/565,211, filed May 4, 2000 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,325,085, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/270,249, filed Mar. 15, 1999 and now U.S. Pat. No. 6,176,050 B1 issued Jan. 23, 2001 which is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 08/861,209, filed May 21, 1997, now abandoned. The content of all the prior applications and the prior art cited therein is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1106624 | Cadwallader et al. | Aug 1914 | A |
2237106 | Minert | Apr 1941 | A |
2465936 | Schultz | Mar 1949 | A |
3001795 | Johnson, Jr. | Sep 1961 | A |
3480069 | Handwerker | Nov 1969 | A |
3805816 | Nolte | Apr 1974 | A |
3862876 | Graves | Jan 1975 | A |
3922822 | Mollinger | Dec 1975 | A |
3949527 | Double | Apr 1976 | A |
4259819 | Wemyss | Apr 1981 | A |
4283888 | Cros | Aug 1981 | A |
4290243 | Mellin | Sep 1981 | A |
4432381 | Greenbaum | Feb 1984 | A |
4487212 | Moore | Dec 1984 | A |
4590714 | Walker | May 1986 | A |
4730423 | Hughes | Mar 1988 | A |
4848386 | Cooper | Jul 1989 | A |
4858395 | McQuirk | Aug 1989 | A |
5076168 | Yoshida et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5174073 | Sabo | Dec 1992 | A |
5197239 | Glynn et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201152 | Heffner | Apr 1993 | A |
5226262 | Kelley | Jul 1993 | A |
5319896 | Winger | Jun 1994 | A |
5347768 | Pineda | Sep 1994 | A |
5394927 | Huebner | Mar 1995 | A |
5406764 | Van Auken et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5435524 | Ingram | Jul 1995 | A |
5502929 | Daniels | Apr 1996 | A |
5522165 | Molla | Jun 1996 | A |
5522184 | Oviedo-Reyes | Jun 1996 | A |
5531239 | Hannah | Jul 1996 | A |
5535565 | Majnaric | Jul 1996 | A |
5579794 | Sporta | Dec 1996 | A |
5687512 | Spoozak et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5791090 | Gitlin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799680 | Dorflinger | Sep 1998 | A |
5862637 | Bruce | Jan 1999 | A |
5915449 | Schwartz | Jun 1999 | A |
5966877 | Hawes | Oct 1999 | A |
6076448 | Rexroad | Jun 2000 | A |
6088975 | Wiegel | Jul 2000 | A |
6161339 | Cornett | Dec 2000 | A |
6176050 | Gower | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6212840 | Davidovitz | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226945 | Henry et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230455 | Arehart | May 2001 | B1 |
6298766 | Mor | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6325085 | Gower | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6412540 | Hendee | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6453621 | Bundy, Jr. et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
411152935 | Jun 1999 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030127122 A1 | Jul 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09270249 | Mar 1999 | US |
Child | 09565211 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09565211 | May 2000 | US |
Child | 10146094 | US | |
Parent | 08861209 | May 1997 | US |
Child | 09270249 | US |