The present invention relates to the protection of persons proximate to an explosion.
More particularly, the invention provides an array of partitions, and a method, arranged to attenuate blast from an explosion on one side of a partition and thereby protect or at least reduce the severity of injury of people on the far side of said partition(s).
A known terrorist tactic used against populations in Colombia, Indonesia, Lebanon, Ireland, Israel, the Philippines, Northern Spain and other countries is to detonate an explosive device among a crowd of people, the aim being to kill and injure as many as possible so as to draw attention—if not sympathy—to their cause or hatreds. Such explosion may be set off by a timing device, radio telephone or manually in the case of a suicide bomber. Security services have difficulty in preventing such attacks, due to the problems of identifying a terrorist among many thousands of other people going about their daily activities. Furthermore, it is not possible economically to place a security guard in every bus, bus shelter, school, kindergarten, large building, store and street where people congregate, nor is it possible to know in advance when and where attacks will be executed.
In Israel, public transportation vehicles in particular have been the subject of many attacks. A Hebrew language newspaper “BASHOVUA” 17 Oct. 2002, in an article “Drivers in the line of fire” reports that between 1948 and 2002 there have been 39 attacks against buses causing 270 fatalities and many more wounded and disabled, some for life.
Well known in the prior art are taxis fitted with a partition separating the passenger and driver compartment. The partition is intended primarily to prevent the passenger(s) from attacking the driver, and do not relate to explosive blast protection.
Hammerton in UK Patent Application 2 275 281 discloses a stud partition which is claimed to be resistant to bullets or bomb blast. The partition is intended for installation in or around a building. Because of its weight and volume the partition is unsuitable for use in vehicles.
A removable partition intended for vans and station wagons is disclosed by Mckenzie in U.S. Pat. No. 4,621,856. The panel has a bowed forward configuration and is intended primarily to prevent persons or objects hitting the driver in the event of emergency braking or of a collision.
In practical terms advance information can prevent only some but not all attacks. What can be done is to arrange areas where attacks are likely in a manner to reduce casualties resulting from explosive charges. A patent search failed to produce any relevant documents on the subject of applying such ideas to public transportation vehicles. In particular nothing was found relating to the reduction of casualties in passenger bus bombings.
It is therefore one of the objects of the present invention to fill a gap in prior art blast protective devices and to provide a partition array to reduce casualties in case of an explosion in a previously defined space.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a blast-protective partition array for passenger buses, while continuing to allow free movement along the length of the vehicle.
The present invention achieves the above objects by providing an array of blast-resistant partitions arranged to subdivide a predetermined space into a multiplicity of interconnected subspaces and thereby to substantially confine an explosive blast to one or more of said subspaces while protecting the remaining subspaces in said predetermined space.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention there is provided an array of blast-resistant partitions wherein said predetermined space is the interior of a public transportation vehicle.
In a further preferred embodiment of the present invention there is provided a method of substantially confining an explosive blast comprising
In especially preferred embodiments of the present invention, said partitions will extend upwardly from the floor surface to a height of about 2 meters, i.e. to protect standing people.
Yet further embodiments of the invention will be described hereinafter.
It will thus be realized that the novel arrangement of the present invention serves also to deter those wishing to kill and injure as many people as possible. A terrorist seeing the partitions is likely to understand their purpose and will then spend time looking for alternative targets—such time increasing the probability of being captured by security forces.
The partition of the present invention will reduce fatalities and injuries even when a large explosive charge is detonated either at the front or the back of the bus, as happened Oct. 21, 2002, when a passenger bus was rammed in the rear by a vehicle holding 100 kg of explosives at the Karkur Junction. Injury reduction also eases the task of rescuing passengers and allowing at least some of the lightly injured to escape by their own efforts before the possible outbreak of fire.
Wherever the partitions are used, space needs to be allocated to enable people to enter and leave. While in some applications the panel could be hinged as a door, usually this is impractical and the subspaces are open on one side to provide passage. Thus the blast is attenuated in the subspaces, even though absolute protection is not provided. However a high degree of protection against flying objects is ensured in all subspaces not directly open to the source of an explosion.
The invention will now be described in connection with certain preferred embodiments with reference to the following illustrative figures so that it may be more fully understood.
With specific reference now to the figures in detail, it is stressed that the particulars shown are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of the preferred embodiments of the present invention only and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of the principles and conceptual aspects of the invention. In this regard, no attempt is made to show structural details of the invention in more detail than is necessary for a fundamental understanding of the invention, the description taken with the drawings making apparent to those skilled in the art how the several forms of the invention may be embodied in practice.
In the drawings:
There is seen in
The partitions 12 divide the inside of the vehicle into a multiplicity of interconnected subspaces 18. Each row of seats 20, after partitions 12 have been added, forms two subspaces 18, one on each side of an aisle running the length of the bus 16.
While not shown partitions can also be positioned in the aisles, where space permits, such as opposite the inner exit doors.
An explosive blast in subspace 18a is substantially confined therein, thereby protecting the remaining subspaces 18 in the bus 16, and reducing the risk of serious injury to passengers occupying the remaining subspaces 18. The subspace 18 also protects its occupants from flying solid objects, whether part of the explosive charge or originating in the vehicle.
Referring now to
The partition is provided with apertures 42 to attenuate blast pressure in the subspace wherein the blast occurs while air pressure rise in the remaining subspaces is within a limit avoiding injury of persons located therein.
Advantageously the upper portion 40 of the partition 38 is made of transparent polycarbonate resin.
Where the partition 38 is to be attached in a vehicle, as for example was seen in
For non-mobile applications there are no weight limits and the lower portion of the partition is made of conventional materials, for example steel-reinforced concrete.
Also part of the present invention is a method of substantially confining an explosive blast comprising the following steps:
An explosive blast in one or more of the subspaces is substantially confined thereto and the partitions protect the remaining subspaces in the predetermined space.
It will be evident to those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to the details of the foregoing illustrative embodiments and that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributes thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
152572 | Oct 2002 | IL | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1433708 | Fenton | Oct 1922 | A |
1501790 | McClay et al. | Jul 1924 | A |
1632360 | Wilson | Jun 1927 | A |
1717533 | Ward | Jun 1929 | A |
2185209 | Love | Jan 1940 | A |
2320596 | Henney | Jun 1943 | A |
3510164 | Setina | May 1970 | A |
4309055 | Law | Jan 1982 | A |
4438677 | Spotzl et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4448107 | Kotai et al. | May 1984 | A |
4621856 | McKenzie | Nov 1986 | A |
4864913 | Grunewald et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5249534 | Sacks | Oct 1993 | A |
5482230 | Bird et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5716026 | Pascasio et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5769257 | Fleisher et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5811719 | Madden, Jr. | Sep 1998 | A |
5866839 | Ohayon | Feb 1999 | A |
5921504 | Elizondo | Jul 1999 | A |
6056239 | Cantu et al. | May 2000 | A |
6286882 | Rastetter | Sep 2001 | B1 |
20030047648 | Batt et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
198 38 236 | Mar 2000 | DE |
1 110 861 | Jun 2001 | EP |
2 275 281 | Aug 1994 | GB |
3-16838 | Jan 1991 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040089143 A1 | May 2004 | US |