The subject invention relates to vehicle underbody blast effects and ballistic damage mitigation.
Mines and improvised explosive devices (IEDs) can damage vehicles and injure or kill vehicle occupants. Some work has been carried out to detect and disable mines and IEDs. Other engineering concerns tailoring vehicles to be more resistant to the blast of a mine or IED. Examples include the V-hull of the MRAP and STRYKER vehicles designed to deflect away a part of the explosive forces originating below the vehicle. See for example, published U.S. Patent Application Nos. 2011/0169240 and 2011/0148147, incorporated herein by this reference.
There is a limit, though, to how much of the explosive blast can be deflected. And, some vehicles cannot be engineered to include a V-hull. Still other vehicles cannot be equipped with heavy armor. The military HMMWV vehicle, for example, is and must remain configured to quickly traverse difficult terrain.
In examples of this invention, a lightweight effective blast shield is designed for use as a vehicle (e.g., underbody) design or as an attachment kit for blast mitigation due to a land mine or IED explosion. The shield is designed to partially deflect away the pressure wave of a blast and/or absorb a significant part of the blast energy by use of mechanisms and a phase changing material. Structures herein may be used to absorb impulses, energy, and/or blasts may be protected in the same way.
The invention features a method of manufacturing a shield by fabricating a plunger plate to include outwardly extending blades on one surface thereof and coupling the plunger plate to a body of damping material with the blades of the plunger plate adjacent the body of damping material. The damping material is configured to transition from a solid to a viscous fluid state locally near the blades of the plunger plate as they are driven into the body. The plunger plate may be formed as a truncated-V shape or a V-shape. The body can be sandwiched between a hull plate and the plunger plate. The hull plate may further include blades extending outwardly from the adjacent body. The hull plate can also be formed as a truncated-V shape or a V-shape.
One method includes stiffening the hull plate and/or plunger plate, adding damping material on top of the hull plate, and/or forming the body in sections and/or plies. The body and plunger plate can be disposed to extend over only a portion of an undercarriage of a vehicle but can could also extend over a majority of the undercarriage of the vehicle. The plunger plate can be side mounted to a vehicle. The body can be formed to include grooves receiving the blade of the plunger plate therein. There can also be grooves on the other surface of the body. The body can be sandwiched between a hull plate and the plunger plate. The hull plate may further includes blades extending outwardly therefrom adjacent the body. The body grooves receiving the blades of the plunger plate therein are preferably offset from the grooves receiving the blades of the hull plate therein.
One preferred shield is made of a damping material e.g., an ultra high molecular weight polyethylene with an acceptable specific heat of fusion greater than 120 J/g to greater than 190 J/g and a molecular weight preferably greater than 3.5 million.
The shield further may further include a second body also made of damping material in a solid state which transitions to a viscous fluid state when stressed. The plunger plate may be disposed between the bodies. In another design, a second plate is adjacent a vehicle hull and the body is between the plunger plate and the second plate. The second plate can be configured as a plunger plate.
The subject invention, however, in other embodiments, need not achieve all these objectives and the claims hereof should not be limited to structures or methods capable of achieving these objectives.
Other objects, features and advantages will occur to those skilled in the art from the following description of a preferred embodiment and the accompanying drawings, in which:
Aside from the preferred embodiment or embodiments disclosed below, this invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or being carried out various ways. Thus, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. If only one embodiment is described herein, the claims hereof are not to be limited to that embodiment. Moreover, the claims hereof are not to be read restrictively unless there is clear and convincing evidence manifesting a certain exclusion, restriction, or disclaimer.
When vehicle 12,
The combination of plunger plate 22 and body 20 functions to absorb the blast energy as the blades 24 are driven into body 20 and it changes from a solid to a viscous fluid state locally near the blades in response due to the pressure of the blast. Plate 22 may deform slightly and the blades of plate 22 will embed in body 20 and cut or partially cut into body 20.
Considering the complete assembly of the blast/impact mitigation shield fitted to the underbody of a vehicle, schematically shown in
When a land-mine or and IED buried at certain depth in soil is detonated under a vehicle, first the mass of soil above the mine or IED strikes the bottom surface of the UHMW-PE body 25 with extremely high velocity. This extremely high momentum of soil is almost immediately reduced to a much smaller magnitude as the soil mass impinges on the UHMW-PE body 25. The resulting normal force is of such high magnitude that in all areas of soil impingements the critical stress required for phase transition of UHMW-PE is crossed. The soil mass gets embedded into the phase transitioned viscous material of the UHMW-PE body and in this process a part of the blast energy is absorbed by the body 25. The ejected soil and the blast pressure, whose magnitude depends on the explosive charge mass contained within the mine/IED and also the standoff, applies an extremely high impact force on the base of plunger plate 22. which then forces most of the plunger blades to penetrate into the UHMW-PE body 20. The resulting stress magnitudes in the UHMW-PE material in front of and surrounding the blades exceed the critical compressive stress magnitude for phase transition of UHMW-PE material. The blades of plunger plate 22 therefore penetrate into the locally transformed viscous material of UHMW-PE body 20, which is supported against the application of normal force by the hull or the armor plate 18 of the vehicle. The work done in this process of plunger plate 22 displacement against the resistance offered to penetration of blades by the UHMW-PE body 20 is quite significant and this accounts for a large amount of blast energy absorption/dissipation. The remaining blast energy would cause the vehicle to be thrown up in the air. The height of throw depends on the remaining energy available following significant amount of energy absorbed by the blast/impact mitigation shield.
The blast/impact mitigation shield therefore reduces the net vertical upward force experienced by the vehicle and its occupants. This results in relatively lower magnitude of vertical acceleration, which can be designed to remain within a certain tolerance level for a specific threat of blast impulse.
The reduction in upward vertical acceleration of a vehicle fitted with a blast/impact mitigation shield following an underbody mine/TED blast can also be explained considering the rate of change of momentum. While a vehicle with only an armor plate used as underbody hull experiences a huge change in momentum within an extremely short time interval, the same vehicle, if fitted with a blast/impact mitigation shield, will take considerably longer time interval for the change of momentum due to the work done by the plunger plate 22 on the UHMW-PE body 20. The force magnitude being proportional to the rate of change of momentum will be smaller for the latter case and so also the magnitude of vertical acceleration.
The preferred phase change material has an extremely high heat of fusion (145-195 J/g), and thus it requires a significant amount of energy to transition it from a solid to a non-flowing viscous liquid state. In so doing, a significant amount of impact energy is dissipated. A material exhibiting a heat of fusion of greater than 190 J/g and a molecular weight of greater than 3.5 million is preferred. But, a heat of fusion greater than about 120 Joules per gram (J/g) may be acceptable. The percent crystallinity should preferably be greater than 10.
The molecular weight, specific heat of fusion and percent crystallinity of the UHMW-PE material stated above are preferred values. However, other polymer materials such as high density polyethylene (HDPE) and other polyethylene exhibiting similar phase transition behavior above a certain critical compression stress, but having smaller values of the above physical parameters can be used for this application.
In the example of
Upon detonation of the C4 explosive, blades 24a-24d cut thorough the first layer of body 20 but only partially embedded in the second layer of body 20. The third layer was unaffected. One-half inch thick metal plunger plate 22 was permanently deformed 1.3″ and hull 18 was deformed 2.9″.
In still another example, under carriage shield 14,
Six 1″ layers were bolted to a ¾″ thick rolled homogeneous armor (RHA) steel test “hull” and tested as in the example above. At a 9.25″ standoff, the hull plate was permanently deformed by 2 ⅞″. The bottom most layer of UHMW-PE material was blistered, cracked, and shredded (heavily soil embedded). The second layer of UHMW-PE material was only marginally affected and was intact, somewhat discolored since it was somewhat exposed to this soil blast. The third through sixth layers of UHMW-PE material were unaffected. With a 15.25″ standoff using four layers of 1″ thick UHMW-PE material, the hull plate deformed by 4″. The lowest most UHMW-PE layer was intact but imbedded with soil. The second through fourth layers were unaffected.
Examples of the invention provide a new type of blast or impact energy absorption that utilize a novel design and unique elastic-plastic deformation behavior of ultra high molecular weight (UHMW) polyethylene or similar materials. They unexpectedly exhibit rapid absorption of kinetic energy and reduce blast force magnitude through an energy absorption process and in causing slight delay in the rate of change of momentum during an impact or blast event. The UHMW-PE material undergoes a reverse phase transition back to solid state when the stress level drops below the critical value following the impact or blast event. It dissipates the absorbed energy by way of expansion through solidification and also in doing work by partially pushing back the plunger or plunger blades. See also U.S. application Ser. No. 13/385,486 file Feb. 22, 2012 incorporated herein by this reference.
Featured is a blast mitigation shield comprising damping material in a solid state and which transitions from a solid to a viscous fluid state when stressed in compression above a critical stress, for example due to a blast event. A plunger plate includes blades positioned in or adjacent to the damping material to be driven into the damping material when impacted by a blast event transitioning the damping material to a viscous fluid state absorbing the impact. In other examples, the system described herein is configured as a drop platform. The “hull” described herein is thus the primary surface of the drop platform.
Blast or impact shields in accordance with the examples of the invention include one or more bodies of damping material in a solid state and which transition from a solid to a viscous fluid state when stressed in compression. Examples of the material include ultra high molecular weight polyethylene, high density polyethylene (HDPE), and equivalents thereof. A constraining frame is optional. If used, the plunger plate may include extended blades which may terminate in pointed knife portions positioned at or closely adjacent to the damping material. When the plunger plate is impacted by a blast event or an impact event, the blades are driven into the damping material transitioning it locally near the blades from a solid to a viscous fluid state absorbing the energy of the blast or the impact through work done by the plunger blades. For an airdrop platform, the damping material and/or plunger blades may be secured to the bottom of a drop platform, and/or distributed as narrow strips along the perimeter of the bottom surface.
The blast/impact mitigation shield can be designed for a vehicle having flat bottom hull as schematically shown in
In other examples, hull plate 36 and plunger plate 30 have a V-shaped, or flat, or conforming shape to fit a particular vehicle undercarriage.
Hull plate 36 may also include blades 62 on its underside (like a plunger plate) and the top of body 34′ may now include grooves 64 receiving blades 62 therein. Blades 62 may also be triangular shaped steel members. Hull plate 36′ may further include stiffening member 66. UHMW-PE strips 40a and 40b may also be provided as before. The grooves 64 on the top of body 34′ are offset from the grooves 60 on the bottom of body 34′. As before, the angled blades 32′ and 62 may penetrate and entrap the phase transitioned material of body 34′ between the hull and blast plates and partly absorb the energy released by a blast.
Thus, although specific features of the invention are shown in some drawings and not in others, this is for convenience only as each feature may be combined with any or all of the other features in accordance with the invention. The words “including”, “comprising”, “having”, and “with” as used herein are to be interpreted broadly and comprehensively and are not limited to any physical interconnection. Moreover, any embodiments disclosed in the subject application are not to be taken as the only possible embodiments.
In addition, any amendment presented during the prosecution of the patent application for this patent is not a disclaimer of any claim element presented in the application as filed: those skilled in the art cannot reasonably be expected to draft a claim that would literally encompass all possible equivalents, many equivalents will be unforeseeable at the time of the amendment and are beyond a fair interpretation of what is to be surrendered (if anything), the rationale underlying the amendment may bear no more than a tangential relation to many equivalents, and/or there are many other reasons the applicant can not be expected to describe certain insubstantial substitutes for any claim element amended.
Other embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art and are within the following claims.
This application is a continuation in part application of patent application Ser. No. 13/507,051. This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/925,354 filed Oct. 19, 2010 which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/281,314 filed Nov. 16, 2009 under 35 U.S.C. §§119, 120, 363, 365, and 37 C.F.R. §1.55 and §1.78 each of which is incorporated herein by this reference. This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/385,486 filed Feb. 22, 2012, and incorporated herein by this reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13507051 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 13604019 | US |