This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/925,354 filed Oct. 19, 2010 which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/281,314 filed Nov. 16, 2009 under 35 U.S.C. §§119, 120, 363, 365, and 37 C.F.R. §1.55 and §1.78 each of which is incorporated herein by this reference. This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/385,486 filed Feb. 22, 2012, and incorporated herein by this reference.
The subject invention relates to vehicle underbody blast effects and ballistic damage mitigation.
Mines and improvised explosive devices (IEDs) can damage vehicles and injure or kill vehicle occupants. Some work has been carried out to detect and disable mines and IEDs. Other engineering concerns tailoring vehicles to be more resistant to the blast of a mine or IED. Examples include the V-hull of the MRAP and STRYKER vehicles designed to deflect away a part of the explosive forces originating below the vehicle. See for example, published U.S. Patent Application Nos. 2011/0169240 and 2011/0148147, incorporated herein by this reference.
There is a limit, though, to how much of the explosive blast can be deflected. And, some vehicles cannot be engineered to include a V-hull. Still other vehicles cannot be equipped with heavy armor. The military HMMWV vehicle, for example, is and must remain configured to quickly traverse difficult terrain.
In examples of this invention, a light weight effective blast shield is designed for use as a vehicle underbody design or attachment kit for blast mitigation due to a land mine or IED explosion. The shield is designed to partially deflect away the pressure wave of a blast and/or absorb a significant part of the blast energy by use of mechanisms and a phase changing material.
Featured is a blast/impact shield comprising a first body including a damping material in a solid state and which transitions to a viscous fluid state when stressed. A second body includes damping material in a solid state and which transitions to a viscous fluid state when stressed. A plunger plate has blades extending outwardly therefrom is between the first and second bodies. In one version, the first body is disposed adjacent a hull and the plunger plate blades are oriented toward the first body. One or both of the first and second bodies may include multiple layers of damping material and/or a slab of damping material.
Another blast/impact shield includes a first body of damping material in a solid state and which transitions to a viscous fluid state when stressed and a plunger plate with blades extending outwardly therefrom adjacent the first body for transitioning material the first body from a solid to a viscous fluid state locally when the blades of the plunger plate are driven into the body. The first body can be disposed adjacent the hull or the plunger plate can be disposed between the hull and the first body.
Still another blast/impact shield features phase change material in a solid state and configured in response to a blast when adjacent a hull to transition from a solid state to a viscous fluid state at least on or at one surface thereof reducing the effects of a pressure wave of the blast and the inertia of any soil accelerated by the blast.
The invention also features a blast mitigation method comprising fabricating a body of solid material which transitions from a solid state to a viscous fluid state when stressed attaching the body to the undercarriage of a vehicle the material of the body transitioning from a solid state to a viscous fluid state when an explosion occurs proximate the body and the body absorbing at least some energy from the explosion mitigating its impact on the vehicle.
The method may include placing the body in a frame. In one version, a plunger plate with blades extending outwardly therefrom is disposed adjacent the body and oriented such that the blades are in or adjacent the body. Another version includes adding to the undercarriage of the vehicle a second body of solid material which transitions to a viscous fluid state when stressed. Now, the plunger plate can be disposed between the first and second bodies.
The subject invention, however, in other embodiments, need not achieve all these objectives and the claims hereof should not be limited to structures or methods capable of achieving these objectives.
Other objects, features and advantages will occur to those skilled in the art from the following description of a preferred embodiment and the accompanying drawings, in which:
Aside from the preferred embodiment or embodiments disclosed below, this invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or being carried out in various ways. Thus, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. If only one embodiment is described herein, the claims hereof are not to be limited to that embodiment. Moreover, the claims hereof are not to be read restrictively unless there is clear and convincing evidence manifesting a certain exclusion, restriction, or disclaimer.
When vehicle 12,
The combination of plunger plate 22 and body 20 functions to absorb the blast pressure as the blades 24 are driven into body 20 and it changes from a solid to a viscous fluid state locally near the blades in response due to the pressure of the blast. Plate 22 may deform slightly and the blades of plate 22 will embed in body 20 and cut or partially cut into body 20.
Considering the complete assembly of the blast/impact mitigation shield fitted to the underbody of a vehicle, schematically shown in
When a land-mine or and IED buried at certain depth in soil is detonated under a vehicle, first the mass of soil above the mine or IDE strikes the bottom surface of the UHMW-PE body 25 with extremely high velocity. This extremely high momentum of soil is almost immediately reduced to zero as the soil mass impinges on the UHMW-PE body 25. The resulting normal force is of such high magnitude that in all areas of soil impingements the critical stress required for phase transition of UHMW-PE is crossed. The soil mass gets embedded into the phase transitioned viscous material of the UHMW-PE body and in this process a part of the blast energy is absorbed by the body 25. The blast pressure, whose magnitude depends on the high explosive (HE) charge mass contained within the mine/IED, applies an extremely high impact force on the base of plunger plate 22, which then forces all the plunger blades to penetrate into the UHMW-PE body 20. The resulting stress magnitudes in the UHMW-PE material in front of and surrounding the blades exceed the critical compressive stress magnitude for phase transition of UHMW-PE material. The blades of plunger plate 22 therefore penetrate into the locally transformed viscous material of UHMW-PE body 20, which is supported against the application of normal force by the hull or the armor plate 18 of the vehicle. The work done in this process of plunger plate 22 displacement against the resistive force offered to penetration of blades by the UHMW-PE body 20 is quite significant and this accounts for a large amount of blast energy absorption. The remaining blast energy would cause the vehicle to be thrown up in the air. The height of throw depends on the remaining energy available following significant amount of energy absorbed by the blast/impact mitigation shield.
The blast/impact mitigation shield therefore reduces the net vertical upward force experienced by the vehicle and its occupants. This results in relatively lower magnitude of vertical acceleration, which can be designed to remain within a certain tolerance level for a specific threat of blast impulse.
The reduction in upward vertical acceleration of a vehicle fitted with a blast/impact mitigation shield following an underbody mine/IED blast can also be explained considering the rate of change of momentum. While a vehicle with only an armor plate used as underbody hull experiences a huge change in momentum within an extremely small time interval, the same vehicle, if fitted with a blast/impact mitigation shield, will take considerably longer time interval for the change of momentum due to the work done by the plunger plate 22 on the UHMW-PE body 20. The force magnitude being proportional to the rate of change of momentum will be smaller for the latter case and so also the magnitude of vertical acceleration.
The phase change material has an extremely high heat of fusion (145-195 J/g), and thus it requires a lot of energy to transition it from a solid to a liquid state. In so doing, a lot of impact energy is dissipated.
In the example of
Upon detonation of the C4 explosive, blades 24a-24d cut thorough the first layer of body 20 but only partially embedded in the second layer of body 20. The third layer was unaffected. One-half inch thick metal plunger plate 22 was permanently deformed 1.3″ and hull 18 was deformed 2.9″.
In still another example, under carriage shield 14,
Six 1″ layers were bolted to a ¾″ thick rolled homogeneous armor (RHA) steel “hull” and tested. At a 9.25″ standoff, the hull plate was permanently deformed by 2⅞″. The bottom most layer of UHMW-PE material was blistered, cracked, and shredded (heavily soil embedded). The second layer of UHMW-PE material was only marginally affected and was intact, somewhat discolored since it was somewhat exposed to this soil blast. The third through sixth layers of UHMW-PE material were unaffected. With a 15.25 inch standoff using four layers, the hull plate deformed by 4″. The lowest most UHMW-PE layer was intact but imbedded with soil. The second through fourth layers were unaffected.
Examples of the invention provide a new type of blast or impact absorption that utilize a novel design and unique elastic-plastic deformation behavior of ultra high molecular weight (UHMW) polyethylene or similar materials. They unexpectedly exhibit rapid absorption of kinetic energy and limit blast force magnitude through an energy absorption process and the rate of change of momentum following an impact or blast event. See also U.S. application Ser. No. 13/385,486 file Feb. 22, 2012 incorporated herein by this reference.
Featured is a blast mitigation shield comprising damping material in a solid state and which transitions from a solid to a viscous fluid state when stressed in compression above a critical stress, for example due to a blast event. A plunger plate includes blades positioned in or adjacent to the damping material to be driven into the damping material when impacted by a blast event transitioning the damping material to a viscous fluid state absorbing the impact. In other examples, the system described herein is configured as a drop platform. The “hull” described herein is thus the primary surface of the drop platform.
Blast or impact shields in accordance with the examples of the invention include one or more bodies of damping material in a solid state and which transition from a solid to a viscous fluid state when stressed in compression. Examples of the material include ultra high molecular weight polyethylene, high density polyethylene HDPE, and equivalents thereof. A constraining frame is optional. If used, the plunger plate may include extended blades which may terminate in pointed knife portions positioned at or closely adjacent to the damping material. When the plunger plate is impacted by a blast event or an impact event, the blades are driven into the damping material transitioning it locally near the blades from a solid to a viscous fluid state absorbing the energy of the blast or the impact through work done by the plunger blades. For an airdrop platform, the damping material and/or plunger blades may be secured to the bottom of a drop platform, and/or distributed as narrow strips along the perimeter of the bottom surface.
The blast/impact mitigation shield can be designed for a vehicle having flat bottom hull as schematically shown in
Thus, although specific features of the invention are shown in some drawings and not in others, this is for convenience only as each feature may be combined with any or all of the other features in accordance with the invention. The words “including”, “comprising”, “having”, and “with” as used herein are to be interpreted broadly and comprehensively and are not limited to any physical interconnection. Moreover, any embodiments disclosed in the subject application are not to be taken as the only possible embodiments.
In addition, any amendment presented during the prosecution of the patent application for this patent is not a disclaimer of any claim element presented in the application as filed: those skilled in the art cannot reasonably be expected to draft a claim that would literally encompass all possible equivalents, many equivalents will be unforeseeable at the time of the amendment and are beyond a fair interpretation of what is to be surrendered (if anything), the rationale underlying the amendment may bear no more than a tangential relation to many equivalents, and/or there are many other reasons the applicant can not be expected to describe certain insubstantial substitutes for any claim element amended.
Other embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art and are within the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2997325 | Peterson | Aug 1961 | A |
3006484 | Pringiers | Oct 1961 | A |
3053526 | Kendall | Sep 1962 | A |
3139290 | Swick | Jun 1964 | A |
3209864 | Boyd | Oct 1965 | A |
3365189 | Carlson | Jan 1968 | A |
3659835 | Peterson | May 1972 | A |
3713641 | Kendall | Jan 1973 | A |
3741560 | Schaller | Jun 1973 | A |
3747915 | Hall | Jul 1973 | A |
3773187 | Carlson | Nov 1973 | A |
3847252 | Casciola | Nov 1974 | A |
3876044 | Kendall et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3913707 | Wastenson et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4040523 | Carle et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4403012 | Harpell et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4778633 | Kiang et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
5349893 | Dunn | Sep 1994 | A |
5354605 | Lin et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5875875 | Knotts | Mar 1999 | A |
6050211 | Yamaguchi | Apr 2000 | A |
6135252 | Knotts | Oct 2000 | A |
6393999 | Schneider | May 2002 | B1 |
6477934 | Bruhn et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6532857 | Shih et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6807891 | Fisher | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7255034 | Strassgurtl et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7806038 | Duke | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7845266 | Duke et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7908959 | Pavon | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7987762 | Joynt et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7997181 | Tunis et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
7997182 | Cox | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8033208 | Joynt et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8146477 | Joynt | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8418597 | Pavon | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20040206591 | Smelser | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060013977 | Duke et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070144337 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080090933 | Muratoglu et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080111396 | Barbe et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090065462 | Gansweidt | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100170386 | Bhatnagar et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100173117 | Duke et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100307327 | Gettle | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100307329 | Kaswen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110114427 | Parida et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110148147 | Tunis et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110169240 | Schreiner et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110259185 | Berning et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120055324 | Pepka | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120152098 | Howland et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120186436 | Parida et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120204711 | Engleman et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130152774 | Gonzalez | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130319215 | Parida et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10 2009 029 814 | Jan 2011 | DE |
60252832 | Dec 1985 | JP |
2007231241 | Sep 2007 | JP |
WO 2011059471 | May 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/57816 mailed Nov. 15, 2013 (nine (9) pages). |
Jauffres et al., “Microstructural origin of physical and mechanical properties of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene processed by high velocity compaction”, Elsevier Ltd. Polymer 48, (2007), pp. 6374-6383. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/604,019, Parida et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/604,248, Parida et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/604,288, Parida et al. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/058420 mailed Jul. 1, 2013 (five (5) pages). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/57814 mailed May 2, 2014 (four (4) pages). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/57821 mailed May 2, 2014 (seven (7) pages). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US2010/002793, mailed Dec. 30, 2010 (five(5) pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130319215 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |