N/A
Various embodiments relate generally to bleacher systems and devices and, more specifically, relate to a deck interlock assembly for a retractable bleacher.
This section is intended to provide a background or context. The description may include concepts that may be pursued, but have not necessarily been previously conceived or pursued. Unless indicated otherwise, what is described in this section is not deemed prior art to the description and claims and is not admitted to be prior art by inclusion in this section.
Folding and telescopic seating structures are bleachers that can be extended for use and closed so as to be retracted into a vertical stack of tiered seating to save floor space.
Because the adjacent tiers of folding and telescopic seating systems are required to slide past each other, operating clearances or allowances need to be designed in. This is typically done in various manners. One approach is to build in camber to the frame pair supporting each individual deck assembly. With this approach, either the angle of the frame's support column welded to the wheeled track, or the angle of the frame's cantilever welded to the support column, or both, are welded at deliberately “non-square” angles, so that the deflection due to the weight of the deck structure, when assembled, nearly or completely levels out the deck. With this approach a lot of the closing friction can be eliminated. However, a downside is that the amount of camber designed into the frames is the same, whereas the weights of the telescopic decks vary widely (based on short vs. long section sizes, heavy vs. light deck accessories, etc.) Thus, the amount of camber can be too much, resulting in a bouncy feeling to the decks when walked upon (particularly when lightly loaded well below capacity), or too little, resulting in excessive closing friction which degrades the operational performance of the telescopic platform.
A second common approach is to design frames with adjustable cantilevers. With adjustable cantilevers, the cantilever-to-frame column angle can be field adjusted, to fine tune the designed amount of operating clearance to allow the telescopic seating structure to close easily, but not enough camber to result in decks that feel bouncy when walking upon. There are numerous downsides to this approach. The design of an adjustable cantilever adds complexity and cost—and some design approaches are purely ineffective. Also, each individual tier may need to be field adjusted to “tune” the bleacher, adding expensive installation labor. And these adjustments can fall out of specification over time, requiring more adjusting over time.
It would be desirable to have a deck interlock mechanism that serves to reduce or eliminate this undesirable movement or deck slap that is experienced as users traverse the bleacher and its associated noise. Additionally, it would be desirable for the deck interlock mechanism to serve to rigidly secure the upper and lower deck assemblies of a bleacher to provide the precisely designed vertical clearance between adjacent tiers when the retractable bleacher is in its fully extended orientation. This clearance would be consistent from tier to tier irrespective of short versus long section sizes, heavy versus light deck accessories, etc.
The below summary is merely representative and non-limiting.
The above problems are overcome, and other advantages may be realized, by the use of the embodiments.
In a first aspect, an embodiment provides a deck interlock apparatus for maintaining a designed vertical clearance between adjacent tiers of a retractable bleacher when the bleacher is in a fully extended orientation. In this embodiment, the deck interlock apparatus includes a first deck interlock member that is mounted to a rear support portion extending upward from the rearward end of a first stabilizer and a second deck interlock member that is mounted to the forward end of a second stabilizer that is disposed at a height above the first stabilizer. The first stabilizer is longitudinally movable in a direction generally parallel to the second stabilizer as the retractable bleacher is opened or closed. The first and second deck interlock members are disposed in abutting relationship and cooperative when the retractable bleacher is fully extended in the open configuration to prevent vertical movement between a first tier including the first stabilizer and a second tier including the second stabilizer.
More specifically, the first interlock member comprises a pawl that is mounted to the upper end of a rear support portion that extends upward from the rearward end of a first stabilizer and the second interlock member comprises a capture bracket that is mounted to the forward end of a second stabilizer disposed at a height above the first stabilizer. The first stabilizer is longitudinally movable with respect to the second stabilizer in response to the opening and closing of the retractable bleacher. When the retractable bleacher is closed, the second stabilizer is disposed generally above and parallel to the first stabilizer. Upon full extension of the retractable bleacher a pawl finger extending from the pawl mounted to the rear support portion of the first, lower stabilizer engages the capture bracket mounted to the forward end of the second, upper stabilizer to rigidly secure the tiers associated with the first and second stabilizers to assure a designed vertical operational clearance between the adjacent tiers and to prevent vertical movement therebetween. In the above-described manner, “deck slap” and the undesirable noise associated therewith is avoided. Further, the “rise” or elevation change from tier to tier is precisely and consistently maintained.
Various aspects are discussed below with reference to the accompanying figures. It will be appreciated that for simplicity and clarity of illustration, elements shown in the drawings have not necessarily been drawn accurately or to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements may be exaggerated relative to other elements for clarity or, several physical components may be included in one functional block or element. Further, where considered appropriate, reference numerals may be repeated among the drawings to indicate corresponding or analogous elements. For purposes of clarity, not every component may be labeled in every drawing.
Aspects of the described embodiments are more evident in the following description, when read in conjunction with the attached Figures.
This patent application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/754,900, filed Nov. 2, 2018, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the various embodiments. It will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that these embodiments may be practiced without some of these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components and structures may not have been described in detail so as not to obscure the disclosed invention.
It is to be understood that the embodiments are not limited in their application to the details of construction and the arrangement of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The embodiments may be practiced or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
It should also be appreciated that certain features, which are, for clarity, described in the context of separate embodiments, may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Additionally, specific features and structures described in conjunction with one embodiment and providing a specific function may be employed in other embodiments provided such a configuration is consistent with the provision of the specific function in the other embodiments. Conversely, various features, which are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any suitable sub-combination.
In various embodiments, the deck interlock apparatus inhibits relative vertical movement between adjacent tiers of bleacher decking of a retractable bleacher. The deck interlock apparatus includes a first engagement member secured to a first decking tier and a second engagement member secured to a second adjacent decking tier. The first engagement member and the second engagement member are configured, arranged and cooperative to prevent vertical movement of the second decking tier with respect to the first decking tier when the retractable bleacher is fully extended to provide a rigid connection or interlock between adjacent tiers. In this manner, deck slap is avoided and a firm walking surface is provided for users of the bleacher. Further, a consistent rise from tier to tier is assured. The first and second engagement members may be mounted to stabilizers, frame members or the like, as described in greater detail below.
Referring to
Seating is typically disposed on the decking 200 of the bleacher tiers. The individual tiers comprise deck assemblies supported by cantilevers 204 that include supporting columns 206 as illustrated in
When a retractable bleacher is being extended from the closed configuration in which the decking tiers are vertically stacked one over the other to the open configuration in which the retractable bleacher is fully extended for use, the lower decking tier including the decking stabilizers 208 associated with the lower decking tier move longitudinally with respect to the decking stabilizers 208 of the upper tier including the decking stabilizers associated with the upper tier. The decking stabilizers move longitudinally in a direction generally perpendicular to the nose 212 of the retractable bleacher. By way of example, consider a retractable bleacher with four (4) decking tiers identified as tiers 1 to 4, where tier 1 is the lowest tier and tier 4 is the highest tier. As the bleacher opens from a closed vertical stack, tier 1 extends with respect to tiers 2-4 (which remain vertically stacked), tiers 1 and 2 extend with respect to tiers 3-4 (which remain vertically stacked), and finally tiers 1-3 extend with respect to tier 4. The bleacher is now fully open. Similarly, with closing: tier 1 closes under tier 2, tiers 1-2 (now vertically stacked) close under tier 3, and finally tiers 1-3 (vertically stacked) close under tier 4. The bleacher is now closed. Thus, during opening, the pawl typically approaches the capture bracket.
It should be noted that the above description describes a typical “forward-fold” operation in which the top tier is fixed and the frames roll forward for opening, starting with the first tier. There is an alternate operation known as “reverse-fold” in which the first tier, not the top tier, is fixed and the frames roll backward for opening, starting with the top tier. Using the same 4 tier example, as the bleacher opens from a closed stack, tier 4 extends back away from tiers 1-3 which remain stacked, tiers 3-4 extend back away from tiers 1-2 which remain stacked, and finally tiers 2-4 extend back away from tier 1. The bleacher is now fully open. Similarly, with closing: tiers 2-4 close over tier 1 (causing tier 1-2 to be stacked), tiers 3-4 close over the stacked tiers 1-2 (causing tier 1-3 to be stacked), and finally tier 4 closes over the stacked tiers 1-3 to make a vertical stack. The bleacher is now closed. Operationally, the pawl to capture bracket relation functions analogously—rather than the pawl approaching the capture bracket, the capture bracket approaches the pawl.
The pawl 214, in one embodiment, is a cast steel part although it may be manufactured from any suitable material such as a hard and durable plastic. Each stabilizer 208 includes a generally vertically extending rear support portion 218. A pawl 214 having a pawl finger 214a is affixed to an upper extent of the rear support portion 218 of each deck stabilizer 208.
The capture bracket 216 in one embodiment is a plastic part although it may be fabricated of any other suitable material. The capture bracket 216 is secured to the forward end of each deck stabilizer 208. In one embodiment a series of opposed pairs of holes 220 are provided near the forward of each stabilizer 208 corresponding to the designed bleacher row spacing. As illustrated in
A pawl 214 is mounted at or near the upper extent of the rear support portion 218 of each stabilizer 208 and is aligned so that a pawl finger 214a of the pawl 214 extends through the opening in the lower surface of the U-shaped channel of the stabilizer 208. The pawl finger 214a traverses the interior of the U-shaped channel of the stabilizer 208 as the retractable bleacher is opened or closed. Rollers or disks 225 having a generally vertical axis are mounted in the upper portion of the rear support portions 218 and are movable within the U-shaped channel of the stabilizers 208 as the retractable bleacher is opened or closed to provide lateral stability of adjacent bleacher tiers.
When the bleacher is fully extended, downward facing inclined surfaces 226 of pawl fingers 214a of pawls 214 mounted to the rear support portions 218 of stabilizers 208a of a first tier engage in abutting relation upward facing inclined surfaces 228 of capture brackets 216 mounted to the forward end of the stabilizers 208b and securely fix the respective tiers vertically with respect to one another so as to prevent vertical movement therebetween while maintaining designed vertical operational clearance.
The design of the pawl 214 and capture bracket 216 are such that as the pawl finger 214a approaches the capture bracket 216 as the retractable bleacher is extended, if the capture bracket 216 is too high, the pawl 214 will force the capture bracket 216 downward and will also pull the deck of the associated tier downward with it to properly secure the two tiers in the designed vertical orientation with respect to one another. Additionally, as the pawl finger 214a approaches the capture bracket 216 as the retractable bleacher is extended, if the capture bracket 216 is too low, inclined bottom surfaces 240 of the capture bracket 216 engage the shoulders 232 of the pawl 214 to force the capture bracket 216 upward to drive the deck of the associated upper tier upward until a generally flat portion 230 of the bottom surface of the capture bracket 216 rests on the pawl shoulders 232 so as to achieve the proper vertical orientation of the tiers with respect to one another. Either way, with inclined surface 226 of the pawl 214 in abutting engagement with the inclined surface 228 of the capture bracket 216, and the bottom surface 230 of the capture bracket 216 resting on the shoulders 232 of the pawl 214, adjacent decking tiers are mechanically secured against vertical movement with respect to each other, e.g., no relative movement either up or down can occur. Anyone standing on such a deck will feel no motion of the deck and “deck slap” is avoided. The deck will have a very solid feel, as though it were a fixed, non-telescopic structure.
The above-described deck interlock apparatus offers significant improvements when incorporated into existing retractable deck structures as noted below.
The interlock apparatus is self-adjusting—no installer adjustments are necessary.
The interlock apparatus can be located at deck stabilizer locations (typically between 3 and 5 per tier or more). Adjustable cantilever designs occur only at 2 per tier.
The decking interlock apparatus may also be implemented at frame locations.
With the folding and telescopic seating fully extended and the deck interlock mechanism engaged, there can be no vertical movement between adjacent tiers—the decks are locked together. The result is a more quiet, safer design.
The deck interlock mechanism ensures adjacent decks are vertically located at their exact rise. For example, if the design rise is 10″, the locked rise will be exactly 10″. Without the presently disclosed deck interlocks, for example, it would not be unusual to measure tiers at 10.25″ rise, due to varying camber of the decks (for designs that utilize camber or adjustable cantilevers). Deck interlocks ensure the design rise is consistently met tier by tier. This is important in achieving a consistent, non-varying rise in the aisles.
Engagement of the interlock members occurs only at the last fractional inch of opening travel—and is disengaged at the initial moment of closing—thereby adding no detrimental operating friction to the system.
The deck interlock mechanism adds another level of telescopic seating safety by providing an engagement, or interlock, between adjacent tiers. It also adds safety by eliminating any deck movement, particularly on lightly loaded telescopic platforms, and by ensuring a consistent, non-varying rise.
The deck interlock mechanism is very easy to install, adding little or no installation time.
In one embodiment, the first and second engagement members have been illustrated in the form of a pawl and a capture bracket. It should be appreciated by those of ordinary skill, that other configurations of the first and second engagement members may be employed without departing from the concepts herein described. By way of example and not limitation, any first and second engagement members that include cooperative ramps, wedges, ramps and pins, or other structures that correct for vertical misalignment of the adjacent decking tiers in response to full extension of the retractable bleacher are contemplated as being within the scope of the present disclosure.
As described above, the interlock mechanism includes first and second engagement members in the form of a pawl and a capture bracket that are mounted to first and second stabilizers of the retractable bleacher. It should be appreciated that the presently disclosed interlock mechanism may be employed at the retractable bleacher frame members rather than at the stabilizers as described above. Typically, in retractable bleacher systems, the top of the lower tier frame column tracks into the cantilever of the upper tier frame as the bleacher opens and closes. Accordingly, a first engagement member, such as a pawl, may be disposed on the top of the column, and a second engagement member, such as the disclosed capture bracket may be disposed on the front of the cantilever. In fact, the interlock mechanism can be stand-alone designed to be independently mounted anywhere along the riser/nose line.
For clarity of description and illustration, an interlock mechanism has been described herein that provides for a rigid interlock of first and second tiers of a retractable bleacher when the bleacher is fully extended. However, retractable bleachers may employ any number of decking tiers and the presently disclosed interlock system employing first and second cooperative engagement members may be employed to rigidly maintain the vertical orientation of some or all of the adjacent decking tiers. By way of example and not limitation, it is not uncommon for retractable bleacher systems to include up to 5, 10, 20 or 30 decking tiers and the presently disclosed interlock mechanism may be employed to vertically secure each of the decking tiers with respect to their adjacent decking tiers.
It should be recognized by those of ordinary skill in the art that modifications to and variations of the above-described apparatus and method for fabricating and using a retractable bleacher having a bleacher interlock mechanism to rigidly secure adjacent bleacher tiers in a designed vertical orientation to avoid deck slap may be made without departing from the concepts disclosed herein. Accordingly, the invention is not to be viewed as limited except by the scope and content of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2815541 | Anderson | Dec 1957 | A |
2846738 | Walworth | Aug 1958 | A |
2870492 | Chervenka | Jan 1959 | A |
2983968 | Wurn | May 1961 | A |
2990587 | Murphy | Jul 1961 | A |
3069732 | Murphy | Dec 1962 | A |
3142871 | Harms | Aug 1964 | A |
3279131 | Curra, Jr. | Oct 1966 | A |
3389511 | Drehobl | Jun 1968 | A |
3429081 | McClelland | Feb 1969 | A |
3667171 | McClelland | Jun 1972 | A |
3768215 | Raymond | Oct 1973 | A |
4000586 | Vance | Jan 1977 | A |
4045921 | Molloy | Sep 1977 | A |
4063392 | Van Ryn | Dec 1977 | A |
4155202 | Hartman | May 1979 | A |
4189876 | Crossman | Feb 1980 | A |
4446659 | Quigley | May 1984 | A |
4467569 | Blanchard | Aug 1984 | A |
4557080 | Walworth | Dec 1985 | A |
4565036 | Lyman, Jr. | Jan 1986 | A |
4571895 | Lyman, Jr. | Feb 1986 | A |
4850159 | Conner | Jul 1989 | A |
5069007 | Paddock | Dec 1991 | A |
5459964 | Doublet | Oct 1995 | A |
5559411 | Winship | Sep 1996 | A |
5784835 | McArthur, Jr. | Jul 1998 | A |
5822929 | Guiles | Oct 1998 | A |
6003270 | MacIntyre | Dec 1999 | A |
6041554 | McArthur, Jr. | Mar 2000 | A |
6212828 | McArthur, Jr. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6244657 | Momose | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6324790 | Victor | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6354041 | Guiles | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6539672 | Frost | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6598351 | Hallberg | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6615548 | Nakamura | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6854216 | Ahrens | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7546705 | Rivera, Jr. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7900402 | Staten | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8296999 | Uhl | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8438786 | Jacobs | May 2013 | B2 |
9332846 | Koch | May 2016 | B2 |
9540831 | Koch | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9650796 | Klingenberg | May 2017 | B2 |
9752338 | Strayer, Jr. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
10053881 | Briggs | Aug 2018 | B2 |
20080190038 | Jacobs | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20110099915 | Sudkamp | May 2011 | A1 |
20120144757 | Hockemeyer | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130055647 | Favell | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20200141142 | Leighton | May 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200141142 A1 | May 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62754900 | Nov 2018 | US |