Claims
- 1. A blow box intended to be used in a plant for drying a material web (1), such as a web of papermaking pulp being advanced through said plant, said blow box having an elongate, essentially right-angled parallel-epipedon shape including an essentially horizontal upper box wall (3) and being intended to be placed, jointly with a plurality of identical blow boxes, below the material web (1) for the purpose of holding the material web floating, i.e. suspended in the air, in a well-defined position above the upper blow box wall (3) by means of air streams that are being blown out of the box while simultaneously drying the material web, said blow box being designed to be placed below the material web (1) in a manner ensuring that the longitudinal centre line (C) of the upper box wall (3) extends transversely of the direction of advancement (P1) of the web (1), the upper well (3) of said blow box being formed with a plurality of essentially circular nozzle orifices (5), and with a plurality of so-called eyelid perforations (6), each one of said perforations consisting of a slit (7) extending in parallel with said centre line (C) and of a depression (8) formed in the upper box wall (3) adjacent the slit, at one side of the latter, said eyelid perforations (6) being arranged in two rows extending in parallel with and on either side of the centre line (C), said nozzle orifices being arranged in rows (9a, 9b, 10a, 10b), likewise extending in parallel with and on either side of said centre line (C), the eyelid perforations in one row being so displaced in the longitudinal direction of the blow box relatively to the eyelid perforations of the other row that the eyelid perforations of both rows together form a zigzag pattern, the eyelid perforations (6) of both rows being oriented in such a manner as to cause air to exit essentially in parallel with the upper box wall (3), towards said centre line (C), and essentially perpendicularly thereto, and the nozzle orifices (5) being directed in such a manner as to cause air to exit essentially at right angles to the upper box wall (3), characterised in that the slits (7) of the eyelid perforations (6) in both rows are equally spaced from said centre line (C), that said centre line (C) intersects the depressions (8) of the eyelid perforations (6) in both rows, that the nozzle orifices (5) are arranged in respectively a first and a second pair of rows (9a, 9b and 10a, 10b, respectively), the two rows of each pair being positioned on either side of and spaced equally from said centre line (C), that the distance of the rows (9a, 9b) of the first pair to said centre line (C) is smaller than the distance of the rows (10a, 10b) of the second pair to said line, that for each eyelid perforation (6) there is a corresponding nozzle orifice (5) in the row (9a or 9b) of the first pair of nozzle orifices that is positioned on the same side of said centre line (C) as a slit (7) of the associated eyelid perforation (6), and also a corresponding nozzle orifice (5) in the row (10a, 10b) of the second pair that is positioned on the opposite side of said centre line (C), each eyelid perforation (6) and its two corresponding nozzle orifices (5) being essentially in alignment in the crosswise direction of the blow box, and in that the upper box wall (3) has a shallow continuous arcuate shape across its entire width.
- 2. A blow box as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that the height of the arc H of the arcuate shape of the upper box wall (3) is related to the degree of perforation P as follows: H=k.multidot.P-5.88, wherein k is a constant which is between 6.2 and 6.9 when H is denoted in mm and P in %.
- 3. A blow box as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterised in that the product of the distance l.sub.2, in mm, between said centre line (C) and the edge of the slit (7) closest to said line, and the width L of said blow box (2), in mm, is 2,800-4,100, preferably about 3,440.
- 4. A blow box as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterised in that the ratio of the length l.sub.1 of the depression (8) to the distance l.sub.2 between said centre line (C) and the edge of the slit positioned closest to that line is 1.2-1.6, preferably 1.4.
- 5. A blow box intended to be used in a plant for drying a material web, said web processing paper pulp and having an elongate, essentially right-angled parallel-piped shape including an essentially horizontal upper box wall, said wall being disposed jointly with a plurality of identical blow boxes below the material web for the purpose of holding the material web floating in a well-defined position above the upper blow box wall by means of air streams that are being blown out of the box while simultaneously drying the material web, said blow box being disposed below the material web to ensure that the longitudinal centre line of the upper box wall extends transversely of the direction of advancement of the web, the upper wall of said blow box being formed with a plurality of essentially circular nozzle orifices and with a plurality of eyelid perforations consisting of a slit extending in parallel with said centre line and of a depression formed in the upper box wall adjacent the slit, at one side, said eyelid perforations being arranged in two rows extending in parallel with on either side of the centre line, said nozzle orifices being arranged in rows extending in parallel with and on either side of said centre line, the eyelid perforations in one row being so displaced in the longitudinal direction of the blow box relatively to the eyelid perforations of the other row such that the eyelid perforations of both rows together form a zigzag pattern, the eyelid perforations of both rows being oriented in such a manner as to cause air to exit essentially in parallel with the upper box wall towards said centre line and essentially perpendicularly thereto, the nozzle orifices being directed in such a manner as to cause air to exit substantially at right angles to the upper box wall, the slits of the eyelid perforations in both rows being equally spaced from said centre line, said centre line intersecting the depressions of the eyelid perforations in both rows, the nozzle orifices being arranged in respective first and second pair of rows, the two rows of each pair being positioned on either side of and spaced equally from said centre line, the distance of the rows of the first pair to said centre line being smaller than the distance of the rows of the second pair to said line, each eyelid perforation having a corresponding nozzle orifice in the row of the first pair of nozzle orifices, each corresponding nozzle orifice being positioned on the same side of said centre line as a slit of the associated eyelid perforation, a corresponding nozzle orifice in the row of the second pair being positioned on the opposite side of said centre line, each eyelid perforation and its two corresponding nozzle orifices being essentially in alignment in the cross-wise direction of the blow box, the upper box wall having a shallow continuous arcuate shape across its entire width, a ratio of a length of the depression to a distance between the centre line and an edge of a respective slit being positioned closest to that line is generally between 1.2-1.6.
Priority Claims (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
9503822 |
Oct 1995 |
SEX |
|
Parent Case Info
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. .sctn.371 of prior PCT International Application No. PCT/SE96/01277, which has an International filing date of Oct. 9, 1996, which designated the United States of America, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by references.
PCT Information
Filing Document |
Filing Date |
Country |
Kind |
102e Date |
371c Date |
PCT/SE96/01277 |
10/9/1996 |
|
|
6/18/1998 |
6/18/1998 |
Publishing Document |
Publishing Date |
Country |
Kind |
WO97/16594 |
5/9/1997 |
|
|
US Referenced Citations (4)
Number |
Name |
Date |
Kind |
3982327 |
Kurie et al. |
Sep 1976 |
|
4719708 |
Karlsson et al. |
Jan 1988 |
|
5471766 |
Heikkila et al. |
Dec 1995 |
|
5946819 |
Reimer et al. |
Sep 1999 |
|
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
0561256 A1 |
Sep 1993 |
EPX |
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry |
Berndt Kaltin, "More Capacity in Less Space with Flakt New Compact Pulp Dryer", Sweden. |
Jorgen G. Hedenhag, "New Applications for Flakt Paper Dryers", Connecticut, Jan. 1976. |