Blowing agent blends

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6310111
  • Patent Number
    6,310,111
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, March 15, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 30, 2001
    22 years ago
Abstract
Foam blowing agents blends of 5-50 mole % HCFC-22 and 95-50 mole % of n-pentane, i-pentane and/or cyclopentane are provided, as are polyol premixes and polyurethane foam compositions containing such blends.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to foam blowing agent blends of (a) chlorodifluoromethane (“HCFC-22” or “22”) with (b) n-pentane (n-C5), i-pentane (i-C5) and/or cyclopentane (c-C5) and to polyol premixes and polyurethane foam compositions containing such blends.




Until now, the leading polyurethane foam blowing agent has been 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane (“141b”), in order to meet the market place requirements for energy, fire performance and cost. At the same time, however, 141b has a high ozone depletion potential (“ODP”) of about 0.1. Thus, many foam manufacturers are now investigating the lower ODP pentanes as candidates to replace 141b, as noted for example in an article on “Hydrocarbon Blown Rigid Polyurethane Foam for the Boardstock Industry—A novel Approach” by R. E. Berrier et al which appeared in Polyurethanes Expo '98, Sep. 17-20, 1998. They too, however, have property shortcomings for use in foam, such as high cost and high k-factor performance in foam (thus giving foams with poor thermal insulating properties).




HCFC-22 has also been disclosed, as in U.S. Pat. No. 4,636,529) for use as a foam blowing agent agent. When used alone, it has certain disadvantages such as a high global warming potential (“GWP”) of about 1700 and an ODP of about 0.055.




It would therefore be useful to provide the industry with an alternative foam blowing agent which overcomes the deficiencies of 22 or the pentanes alone in terms of properties such as ODP, GWP, cost, and k-factor performance.




BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




Foam blowing agent compositions are provided, which compositions comprise (a) about 5 to 50 mole % of chlorodifluoromethane and (b) about 95 to 50 mole % of a pentane selected from the group consisting of one or more of n-pentane, i-pentane and cyclopentane, as well as foam premix compositions, which premix compositions comprise a polyol and the foregoing blowing agent blend, and polyurethane foam compositions, which foam compositions comprise an A-side containing an isocyanate and a B-side containing a polyol and all or a portion of the foregoing blowing agent blend.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




It has now been found that the foregoing blends of pentanes with HCFC-22 overcomes deficiencies associated with the use of either alone. Most important, as shown below, the addition of relatively small amounts of 22 has been found to lower the k-factor (and thus enhance the thermal insulating properties) of foams made with such blends relative to the use of the pentanes alone, while still taking advantage of the low ODP (zero) and GWP properties of the pentanes (for example, cyclopentane has a GWP of 11 versus a GWP of 1700 for 22 alone). Other advantages include lowering of the cost of use of pentanes alone (especially cyclopentane), improved solubility in raw materials such as polyester polyols (especially for n-pentane and i-pentane) and less volatile organic compound (“VOC”) content than pure hydrocarbon since HCFC-22 is not a VOC.




The unexpected improvement shown in the following examples in low temperature (0° C.) k-factor performance is particularly significant for many foam applications such as for refrigerators, freezers and cold storage facilities.




The preferred amount of 22 in the blends varies with the particular pentane or pentane mixture, as shown by the examples below, but is generally in the 10-35 mole % range.




In the premix compositions, the blowing agent blend is typically present in a concentration range of about 2-60 weight % (preferably 5-40 weight %), based on the weight of the polyol.




In the polyurethane foam compositions, the effective concentrations of the blends are typically about 0.1-25 weight % (preferably 0.5-15%) based on the weight of the total polyurethane foam formulation.




The pentane component and/or the 22 component of the blend can be added to the A-side or the B-side or a portion thereof distributed in each side. It is also possible to add the blowing agent composition as a third stream to the foam machine, wholly apart from the A- or B-side.




The other components of the premix and foam formulations may be those which are conventionally used, which components and their proportions are well known to those skilled in the art. For example, catalysts, fire retardants and surfactants are typical components of the B-side.




The practice of the invention is illustrated in more detail in the following non-limiting examples. The formulations used (all having an Iso Index of 300) each contained 170.51 parts M-489, a polymeric methane diphenyl diisocyanate available from Bayer Corporation; 100 parts T-2541, a polyester polyol having a hydroxyl number of 240 available from Kosa; 0.19 part PC-5 and 0.33 part PC-46, which are, respectively, pentamethyldiethylenetriamine and potassium acetate in ethylene glycol, catalysts available from Air Products; 2.98 parts K-15, potassium octoate in dipropylene glycol, a catalyst available from Air Products; 2 parts B-8462, a polysiloxane-polyether copolymer surfactant available from Goldschmidt Chemical Corporation; 10 parts AB-80, a tris(1-chloro-2-propyl)phosphate fire retardant available from Albright & Wilson Americas, Inc; and about 24-25 parts blowing agents, the exact amounts of which are more particularly set forth below; all parts are by weight.




A-side premix components, containing isocyanate and 75% of the blowing agent, were mixed and cooled to 10° C. B-side premix components, containing polyol, surfactant, fire retardant, and 25% of the blowing agent, were also mixed and cooled to 10° C.












TABLE I









Parts of Blowing Agent in Comparative






Examples with only Pentane Blowing Agent





























i-C5:




24.91




 9.96

















c-C5:









14.53




24.23












n-C5:



















24.91























TABLE I









Parts of Blowing Agent in Comparative






Examples with only Pentane Blowing Agent





























i-C5:




24.91




 9.96

















c-C5:









14.53




24.23












n-C5:



















24.91















In making the foam, the A and B side premixes were mixed for 20 seconds, followed by injection of the catalyst mixture. Mixing was continued for 15 seconds (except for the i-C5/22 blend, for which the mixing continued for only 10 seconds in order to reduce frothing), after which the mixture was poured into a box.




ASTM procedures were then followed to measure (initial) k-factors (ASTM C518) of the resultant foams at ambient temperature (24° C.) and at 0° C. The results are shown in Tables III and IV:












TABLE III









K-factors (in BTU.in/ft


2


.hr.° F.) at 24° C.






(% s in blends are in mole %)


























For 100% n-C5:




0.173







For 5%/95% blend




0.171







of 22/n-C5:







For 10%/90% blend




0.167







of 22/n-C5:







For 100% i-C5:




0.167







For 5%/95% blend




0.164







of 22/i-C5:







For 10%/90% blend




0.164







of 22/i-C5:







For 15%/85% blend




0.163







of 22/i-C5:







For 100% c-C5:




0.161







For 10%/90% blend




0.161







of 22/c-CS:







For 20%/80% blend




0.154







of 22/c-CS:







For 100% of a




0.160







60/40 c-C5/i-C5







blend:







For 5%/95% blend




0.160







of 22 with the







60/40 c-C5/i-C5







blend:







For 10%/90% blend




0.156







of 22 with the







60/40 C-C5/i-C5







blend:







For 20%/80% blend




0.151







of 22 with the







60/40 C-C5/i-C5







blend:























TABLE IV









K-factors (in BTU.in/ft


2


.hr.° F.) at 0° C.






(% s in blends are in mole %)


























For 100% n-C5:




0.192







For 5%/95% blend




0.183







of 22/n-C5:







For 10%/90% blend




0.176







of 22/n-C5:







For 100% i-C5:




0.177







For 5%/95% blend




0.165







of 22/1-C5:







For 10%/90% blend




0.160







of 22/i-C5:







For 15%/85% blend




0.157







of 22/1-C5:







For 100% c-C5:




0.159







For 10%/90% blend




0.156







of 22/c-C5:







For 20%/80% blend




0.147







of 22/c-C5:







For 100% of a




0.167







60/40 c-C5/i-C5







blend:







For 5%/95% blend




0.166







of 22 with the







60/40 c-C5/i-C5







blend:







For 10%/90% blend




0.157







of 22 with the







60/40 c-C5/i-C5







blend:







For 20%/80% blend




0.148







of 22 with the







60/40 c-C5/i-C5







blend:














Claims
  • 1. A polyurethane foam composition comprising an isocyanate, a polyol and a foam blowing agent comprising (a) about 5 to 50 mole % of chlorodifluoromethane and (b) about 95 to 50 mole % of a pentane selected from the group consisting of one or more of n-pentane, i-pentane and a mixture of i-pentane and cyclopentane, said foam composition having (c) an A-side which contains the isocyanate and, optionally, a portion of the foam blowing agent and (d) a B-side which contains the polyol and the balance of the foam blowing agent.
  • 2. The polyurethane foam composition of claim 1 wherein the pentane portion of the foam blowing agent comprises a mixture of i-pentane and cyclopentane.
  • 3. The polyurethane foam composition of claim 1 wherein the foam blowing agent comprises (a) about 5 to 50 mole % of chlorodifluoromethane and (b) about 95 to 50 mole % of a pentane selected from the group consisting of one or more of n-pentane and i-pentane.
US Referenced Citations (2)
Number Name Date Kind
4636529 Crooker Jan 1987
5444101 De Vos et al. Aug 1995
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
“Hydrocarbon Blown Rigid Polyurethane Foam For the Boardstock Industry—A Novel Approach” by R. Berrier et al.