Blueprinting of multimedia assets

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11308528
  • Patent Number
    11,308,528
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, May 2, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 19, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
Content management systems that utilize blueprinting and external content libraries are described herein. Methods for managing a web-based marketing campaign using a blueprint may include establishing a blueprint for a web-based marketing campaign using a content management system, the blueprint having rules for managing assets utilized by at least a portion of a plurality of publications of a hierarchical model of the web-based marketing campaign, the plurality of publications having at least one parent publication and at least one child publication. In some instances, a portion of the assets utilized by the hierarchical model are stored on an external content library. The methods may also include determining a change in at least one asset for the at least one parent publication, and automatically inheriting the change in the at least one asset for the at least one parent publication to the at least one child publication according to the blueprint.
Description
FIELD OF THE PRESENT TECHNOLOGY

The present technology relates generally to web content management and web content management systems, and more specifically, but not by way of limitation, to web content management systems and methods that employ blueprinting to manage multi-faceted and/or multi-channel online marketing campaigns.


BACKGROUND

Managing multi-channel and/or multi-dimensional online marketing campaigns can be an onerous task. For example, ensuring that changes in assets in one or more publications of a multi-faceted (e.g., online marketing campaign having a plurality of publications such as web pages, campaign mobile advertisements, social media communications, products, microsites, and so forth) online marketing campaign are appropriately shared and/or inherited through the online marketing campaign is an important, yet tedious endeavor. Inconsistent content delivery of media assets across the web marketing campaign may result in a sloppy product presentation and unpredictable brand communication to customers. Thus, it may be advantageous for each publication within the marketing campaign to be treated as either a unique site or as a parent/child structure that can hide, inherit, localize and publish data from other related sites/structures. What is needed is an architecture that enables business communication professionals to effortlessly use shared resources across multiple publications, while retaining control over content that makes each site unique.


SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT TECHNOLOGY

According to some embodiments, the present technology may be directed to methods for managing a web-based marketing campaign using a blueprint. These methods may comprise the steps of: (a) establishing a blueprint for a web-based marketing campaign using a content management system, the blueprint comprising rules for managing assets utilized by at least a portion of a plurality of publications of a hierarchical model of the web-based marketing campaign, the plurality of publications comprising at least one parent publication and at least one child publication, at least a portion of the assets utilized by the hierarchical model being stored on an external content library; (b) determining a change in at least one asset for the at least one parent publication; and (c) automatically inheriting the change in the at least one asset for the at least one parent publication to the at least one child publication.


According to additional embodiments, the present technology may be directed to methods for managing a web-based marketing campaign using a blueprint. These methods may comprise the steps of: (a) establishing a blueprint for a web-based marketing campaign using a content management system, the blueprint comprising rules for managing assets utilized by at least a portion of a plurality of publications of a semantic model of the web-based marketing campaign, the blueprint comprising rules for localizing assets for each of the plurality of publications, at least a portion of the assets being stored on an external content library; (b) determining a change in at least one asset for at least one of the plurality of publications; and (c) automatically inheriting the change in the at least one asset for the at least one of the plurality of publications to a dependent publication, according to the blueprint.


According to additional embodiments, the present technology may be directed to methods for managing a web-based marketing campaign using a blueprint. These systems may comprise: (a) a memory for storing executable instructions; and (b) a processor for executing the executable instructions, the executable instructions comprising: (i) a blueprinting module that establishes a blueprint for a web-based marketing campaign using a content management system, the blueprint comprising rules for managing assets utilized by at least a portion of a plurality of publications of a hierarchical model of the web-based marketing campaign, the plurality of publications comprising at least one parent publication and at least one child publication, at least a portion of the assets utilized by the hierarchical model being stored on an external content library; (ii) an asset manager module that receives a change in at least one asset for the at least one parent publication; and (iii) wherein the blueprinting module automatically inherits the change in the at least one asset for the at least one parent publication to the at least one child publication.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Certain embodiments of the present technology are illustrated by the accompanying figures. It will be understood that the figures are not necessarily to scale and that details not necessary for an understanding of the technology or that render other details difficult to perceive may be omitted. It will be understood that the technology is not necessarily limited to the particular embodiments illustrated herein.



FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary architecture for practicing aspects of the present technology.



FIG. 2A is an exemplary graphical user interface in the form of an external content repository browser.



FIG. 2B is an exemplary graphical user interface in the form of a media manager provider interface.



FIG. 3A illustrates an exemplary hierarchical model of publications.



FIG. 3B illustrates an exemplary semantic model of publications.



FIG. 4 is an exemplary user interface in the form of a hierarchical model map.



FIG. 5 illustrates inheritance and localization of assets between parent and child publications within a hierarchical model of publications, using a blueprint.



FIG. 6 is a flowchart of an exemplary method for managing a web-based marketing campaign using a blueprint.



FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an exemplary computing system for implementing embodiments of the present technology.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

While this technology is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there is shown in the drawings and will herein be described in detail several specific embodiments with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principles of the technology and is not intended to limit the technology to the embodiments illustrated.


It will be understood that like or analogous elements and/or components, referred to herein, may be identified throughout the drawings with like reference characters. It will be further understood that several of the figures are merely schematic representations of the present technology. As such, some of the components may have been distorted from their actual scale for pictorial clarity.


Generally speaking, the present technology may be directed, in some embodiments, to web content management methods and systems that employ blueprinting to manage multi-faceted and/or multi-channel online marketing campaigns. The capabilities of the present technology provide a unique solution for multi-site management, especially when compounded with multi-faceted deployment requirements that may include localization, taxonomy, workflows, and geographic locales. Additionally, the present technology maintains relationships across multiple sites of an online marketing campaign, allowing for one-click updating, with site owners notified of asset changes while the content update (e.g., asset changes) is automatically inherited. The term inherited, as used throughout, may refer also to the “sharing” of content between publications, as well. That is, while the term inheriting connotes a parent-child relationship, the term sharing may be construed as being agnostic to vertical or horizontal relationships between publications. Nevertheless, inheriting may be understood to include both inheritance and sharing of assets between publications.


It will be understood that each publication (the highest-level directory structure) within a web marketing campaign can be configured as its own unique site or as a parent/child structure that can hide, inherit, localize and publish data. This architecture enables business communication professionals to effortlessly use shared resources across multiple websites, while retaining control over content that makes each site unique.


In operation, the present technology may be utilized to leverage and empower brand, management, multi-channel microsites, information architecture (IA) designs, taxonomy, search engine optimization (SEO)/search, campaigns, editorial workflows, and other web marketing activities that would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art. Additionally, the present technology addresses the multiplicity of web content management needs of current organizations that use a variety of platforms to publish content for the web, mobile, social media, and tablets—just to name a few.


The blueprints provided herein are flexible and can be adjusted over time to meet new business requirements using features such as personalization tags, permissions, roles, and architecture-based functions. These features enable organizations to take ownership of their blueprint by making changes and adjustments to their online marketing campaigns without having to redevelop the entire site strategy or templates and, in the end, cuts down significantly on development effort and timelines.


Additionally, these web content management systems may utilize external content libraries that reside on external content repositories. That is, the present technology may be utilized to virtually mount an external content library to a content management system that utilizes blueprints of the present technology.


These and other advantages of the present technology will be described in greater detail below with reference to the collective drawings (e.g., FIGS. 1-7).



FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary architecture 100 for practicing aspects of the present technology. According to some embodiments, the exemplary architecture 100, hereinafter “architecture 100,” may generally include a content management system, hereinafter “CMS 105.” According to some embodiments, the CMS 105 may be configured to virtually mount an external content library such that assets stored in the external content library are accessible through the content management system similarly to local assets of a local content repository associated with the content management system.


Additionally, the CMS 105 may be configured to allow content authors to manage a web-based marketing campaign using a blueprint. In some embodiments, managing of a web-based marketing campaign may comprise the step of establishing a blueprint for a web-based marketing campaign using a content management system. It will be understood that the blueprint may comprise rules for managing assets utilized by at least a portion of a plurality of publications of a hierarchical model of the web-based marketing campaign. In some instances, the plurality of publications may comprise at least one parent publication and at least one child publication. Additionally, at least a portion of the assets utilized by the hierarchical model may be stored on an external content library.


According to some embodiments, the methods of the present technology may comprise a step of determining a change in at least one asset for the at least one parent publication, as well as a step of automatically sharing and/or inheriting the change in the at least one asset for the at least one parent publication to the at least one child publication, according to the blueprint.


It is noteworthy to mention that rather than a hierarchical model of publications, the blueprint may likewise be utilized with a semantic model of publications, which will be described in greater detail below.


According to various embodiments, the CMS 105 may be configured to use an external content library by registering an external content library with the CMS 105 using an external content provider module. Additionally, the CMS 105 may then map assets of the external content library for use within the CMS 105.


The CMS 105 is shown as comprising a content manager 110 that communicatively couples with one or more external content provider modules, such as external content provider module 115. The CMS 105 may also comprise a framework module 120 that governs the interactions between the content manager 110 and an external content library 125, via the external content provider module 115 (which is also referred to as the external repository provider module 115). Generally speaking, the CMS 105 may be configured to utilize one or more external content repositories, such as the external content library 125, as well as a local content repository 105A. The external content provider module 115 and the framework module 120 cooperate to provide end users with access to assets that reside on the external content library 125, as if the assets were stored locally on the local content repository 105A, as will be described in greater detail infra.


The external content library 125 may be stored in an external content repository 125A that resides on an external system 125B such as a web server or computing device that is positioned remotely from the CMS 105. It will be understood that the external content library 125 and the CMS 105 may preferably be owned by different entities. Additionally, individual assets on the external content library 125 may be associated or owned by different owners such that the external content library 125 includes assets for a plurality of owners. The external content library 125 and the CMS 105 may be communicatively coupled via a network 135. It is noteworthy to mention that the network 135 includes any one (or combination) of private or public communications networks such as the Internet. In some instances, an external content provider module 115 may communicatively couple with the external content repository 125A via an application programming interface (API). The API used by the external content provider module 115 may include a secure or insecure API.


In some instances, the CMS 105 may be implemented within a cloud-based computing environment. In general, a cloud-based computing environment is a resource that typically combines the computational power of a large model of processors and/or that combines the storage capacity of a large model of computer memories or storage devices. For example, systems that provide a cloud resource may be utilized exclusively by their owners, such as Google™ or Yahoo!™; or such systems may be accessible to outside users who deploy applications within the computing infrastructure to obtain the benefit of large computational or storage resources.


The cloud may be formed, for example, by a network of web servers, with each web server (or at least a plurality thereof) providing processor and/or storage resources. These servers may manage workloads provided by multiple users (e.g., cloud resource consumers or other users). Typically, each user places workload demands upon the cloud that vary in real-time, sometimes dramatically. The nature and extent of these variations typically depend on the type of business associated with the user.


The content manager 110 of the CMS 105 may be utilized by content authors to design, create, and manage web contents such as web pages using various web development tools that would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art. Content authors may create web contents from scratch, or in some instance, utilize templates.


In general, content authors may create web content using graphical user interfaces generated by a user interface module 140 of the content manager 110. An exemplary graphical user interface in the form of an external content repository browser window (e.g., Media Manager UI), generated by the user interface module 140 is illustrated in FIG. 2A. An exemplary graphical user interface in the form of a media manager provider interface, generated by the user interface module 140 is illustrated in FIG. 2B. Each of these graphical user interfaces will be described in greater detail infra.


As mentioned before, the CMS 105 may include one or more external content provider modules, such as the external content provider module 115 that each registers with an individual external content library. In some instances, a single external content provider module may register with more than one external content library, and further, the single external content provider module may register with multiple external content libraries of differing domains (e.g., classes).


The external content provider module 115 may register the external content library 125 using an API. The API may utilize either secure or insecure data transmission methods for exchanging data between the external content provider module 115 and the content manager 110. In some instances, content authors or system administrators may configure settings that are utilized by the external content provider module 115 for exchanging data between the external content provider module 115 and the content manager 110. For example, a system administrator may establish end point configuration settings for exchanging data between the external content library and the external content provider.


In various embodiments, registering the external content library 125 with the external content provider module 115 may comprise establishing a transport level security configuration between the external content library 125 and the external content provider module 115. According to some embodiments, configuration settings may comprise the establishment of a trust relationship for end-user asset provisioning. For example, content authors may be required to present and/or verify their identity before accessing assets that reside on an external content repository.


Once the external content library 125 has been registered with the CMS 105 via the external content provider module 115, the framework module 120 may be executed to map at least a portion of the content (e.g., assets) that resides on the external content repository.


Generally speaking, the framework module 120 may comprise an asset mapper module 145, an asset tracker module 150, an asset manager module 155, and a query module 160. It is noteworthy that the framework module 120 may include additional or fewer modules, engines, or components, and still fall within the scope of the present technology. As used herein, the term “module” may also refer to any of an application-specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”), an electronic circuit, a processor (shared, dedicated, or group) that executes one or more software or firmware programs, a combinational logic circuit, and/or other suitable components that provide the described functionality. In other embodiments, individual modules of the framework module 120 may include separately configured web servers.


The asset mapper module 145 may be configured to map the assets that reside on the external content library 125 to the content manager 110 such that the contents of the external content library 125 are made available to the content manager 110 similarly to content or assets stored locally on a local content repository of the CMS 105.


Mapping of the assets may include identifying assets included in one or more external content libraries that reside within file systems or file structures (e.g., folders, sub-folders, drives, etc.) of the external content repository 125A. Once the assets have been identified, the asset mapper module 145 to determine particular types of information regarding each type of asset. For example, the asset mapper module 145 may be configured to determine a file name, file type, file size, file version, and/or any other types of file information that would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art. Various combinations of these types of information may also be gathered. Additionally, the asset mapper module 145 may obtain or generate a thumbnail image of each asset that is mapped, if available.


Once the assets of the external content library 125 have been mapped by the asset mapper module 145, the assets are made available to the content manager 110 as if the assets were stored locally on the local content repository 105A. For example, when a content author is creating web content and the content author queries the content manager 110 for available assets, mapped assets that are stored on the external content library 125 are returned in the search results, along with any local assets that reside on the local content repository 105A.


For example, a content author may query the content manager 110 for image file assets that are associated with a particular keyword or keywords. The content manager 110 may utilize mapped asset indices created from asset mappings determined by the asset mapper module 145. These asset mappings may be of assets located on an external content library 125 or assets that are stored locally on the local content repository 105A. The content manager 110 may return a query response that includes representations of assets that match the query, which reside on either the external or local content libraries. It will be understood that the asset mapper module 145 may map the assets of the external content library 125 onto the content manager 110 using other features than indices, such as tables, graphs, lists, and so forth.


Additionally, the mapped assets of the external content library 125 may be viewed by a content author via the content manager 110 by way of a graphical user interface generated by the user interface module 140. FIG. 2A illustrates an exemplary user interface in the form of an external content repository browser window 200. This browser window 200 may resemble an explorer window that would be generated by an operating system, a browser window generated by a web browser application, or any other suitable interface that would allow the end user to browse the contents of a file structure, such as a folder. The browser window 200 may comprise a web content ribbon 205 that allows a content author to manage web content using a plurality of features. Again, these features may comprise blueprinting features, publishing features, web content editing features, as well as other features that would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art.


The browser window 200 may also comprise a content management pane 210 that provides views of various publications (e.g., web content) and their constituent assets in a hierarchical format. The browser window 200 may also comprise an asset pane that includes a plurality of assets. These assets have been mapped to the content manager 110 such that the assets may be displayed to the content author. In this example, thumbnail images of assets of an external content library are displayed to the content author. A Media Manager UI 215 may be utilized to define a playlist scheme that defines the use of an exemplary asset such as an image file. The content author may specify the media type and resource type for the image asset from dropdown lists. The UI 215 may also comprise a graphical representation of a hierarchy of assets of a playlist for use within a publication (e.g., pre-roll, content, post-roll). In some embodiments, right clicking or hovering over an asset in the browser window 200 may cause the user interface module 140 to display information regarding the asset such as a file name, file size, and so forth. Again, these file attributes were determined during mapping of the assets by the asset mapper module 145.



FIG. 2B is an exemplary graphical user interface in the form of a media manager provider interface 225. The interface 225 may comprise a folder tree that includes assets mapped to local and/or external content. In this example, a marketing videos folder 230 has been selected. A media pane 235 is then populated with assets 240 included in the videos folder 230. An component content window 245 comprises a visual representation of an asset “My nice Video” as well as Tabs 250 that include a General Tab with basic descriptive information for an asset 255, an Info tab that includes further information for the asset, and a Workflow tab that includes implementational details for using the asset in a publication.


After browsing for assets on the external content repository, the content author may select an asset from the external content library for use in the creation of web content, such as a web page. The selection and inclusion of the asset causes the asset mapper module 145 to perform a second type of mapping. More specifically, the second type of mapping executed by the asset mapper module 145 may link a selected asset to web content being created by the content author. That is, the framework module 120 of the content manager 110 may utilize the asset mapper module 145 to manage links between, for example, a web page created by the content author, and an asset located on an external content repository that has been selected for inclusion into the web page. Thus, when the web page is published, the linked asset may be obtained from the external content repository when the web page is requested.


The asset mapper module 145 may also advantageously track the mapping between the asset on the external content library 125 and the content manager 110 such that changes to the asset are identified and updated in the content manager 110 to reduce the likelihood that changes in the asset will result in errors in retrieving the content at a later date. Therefore, the asset mapper module 145 may continuously or periodically evaluate the assets of the external content library 125 to identify changes in assets.


For example, if the owner of the asset on the external content library 125 changes the location of asset from one file folder to another file folder, the asset mapper module 145 may recognize this change and update the mapping between the asset and the web content to reflect this change. In sum, the mapping of assets by the asset mapper module 145 may not be only a static or singular event that occurs when the external content library 125 is initially registered, but may occur at regular or sporadic intervals to ensure that assets are available and properly linked to web content, as required.


As mentioned briefly above, the asset mapper module 145 may utilize a built-in Security Token Services (STS) to establish a secure trusted connection between CMS 105 and one or more external content repositories. In other instances, the asset mapper module 145 may utilize an external STS such as Active Directory Federation Services™ Windows Azure Active Directory™/Access Control Service (WAAD/ACS), Tivoli Access Manager™, Ping Identity™, or other external STS that would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art.


As assets residing on mapped external content libraries are utilized, the asset tracker module 150 may be executed to track the usage of such assets. For example, the asset tracker module 150 may identify when an asset has been included in a publication. The asset tracker module 150 may also identify when the asset has been requested by a publishing server, such as the web server that is utilized to publish the web content that includes the selected assets. Other similar metrics regarding the incorporation of assets within web content and/or actual usage (e.g., requests) of assets relative to their provisioning via delivery of the web content.


The asset tracker module 150 may provide usage information for an asset of the external content library utilized through the content management system to an owner of the asset. In some instances, the owner of the asset may be compensated for the inclusion of the asset within a web page or other web content. The tracking of asset usage by the asset tracker module 150 may provide a unique mechanism for compensating the owners of assets that reside on external content repositories. Advantageously, content authors may utilize assets that are external to the CMS 105 without being obligated to obtain the entire external content library. Additionally, the ability of the present technology to map and make available assets that are external to the CMS 105 allows for extending a corpus of assets that are available to the content library of the CMS 105 without obligating the system administrators of the CMS 105 to store assets locally, which increases the operating expenses for the CMS 105.


In sum, the ability of the present technology to register and map external content libraries to a local CMS 105 effectively creates a distributed and robust collection of assets for the CMS 105 that reduces the administrative cost and burden of maintaining a comprehensive content library.


According to some embodiments, the content manager 110 may be configured to allow content authors to modify assets stored on external content repositories by execution of an asset manager module 155. In some instances, proper authorization may be required from the owner of the assets of an external content library before a modification to an asset may be allowed. For example, the asset owner may be required to select various permissions for an asset, such as read, write, delete, and so forth.


Generally, content authors may also be allowed to delete and/or upload assets to the external content library 125, with these changes being identified by the asset mapper module 145 to ensure that mappings remain valid.


In some embodiments, the asset manager module 155 may be utilized to evaluate versions of an asset of the external content library 125. The asset mapper module 145 may cooperate with the asset manager module 155 to track and map the usage of the various versions of an asset of the external content library 125.


One of the many advantages of the mapping of external assets for use in a local CMS 105 is that when a content author queries the content manager 110 of the CMS 105 for assets, the content manager 110 may provide results that include assets from local content repositories, as well as external content libraries. Thus, as the content author builds their web content and queries for content that the content author desires to utilize in their web content, the content author may view assets on external content libraries as if the resided locally on a local content repository.


Thus, the query module 160 may be executed to receiving a content query via the content manager 110. The query module 160 may search a local content repository associated with the content management system and the external content library using the content query, and return results in response to the content query. Again, the registering and mapping of assets on external content repositories to the CMS 105 results in the assets of the external content libraries being made available as if they were stored locally on a local content repository of the CMS 105.


In accordance with the present disclosure, if a content author desires to effective manage a plurality of publications of a web marketing campaign, the content author may establish a blueprint for the web marketing campaign. Thus, the blueprinting module 165 of the content manager 110 may be executed to establish a blueprint for the web marketing campaign.


In general, publications for a web marketing campaign may be arranged into either a hierarchical model of publications or a semantic model of publications. The content manager 110 may execute the user interface module 140 to generate various user interfaces that allow the content author to create a blueprint. For example, the content author may establish relationships between publications, such as parent/child.


Additionally, the content author may establish rules for inheriting changes in assets based upon these established relationships. For example, the content author may establish a rule that requires all logo images to be inherited from the parent in an unmodified format to ensure that the logo/branding associated with the publication is consistent. A rule may be established that all tradename, trademark, servicemark, logo, brand, or other source identifiers be consistently used (e.g., inherited in an unmodified manner). The content author may also establish an exemplary rule such as localization requirements for a child publication. For example, the content author may establish rules for a child publication that is to be published to French readers that requires all text assets to be translated into French.


According to some embodiments, external content stored on the external content library 125 may be appended with metadata by the content manager 110. Metadata for the assets of a publication may be inherited according to the blueprint associated with the publication. In some instances the metadata may be localized to reflect the specific attributes of assets associated with a child publication. For example, if an asset such as a video file or an image file includes an alternative text asset, this alternative text may be shown on a website (e.g., child publication). It will be understood that the text for the asset may be localized to a language of that specific regional website. Thus, the alternative text for the asset may vary upon the localization rules included in the blueprint. If the blueprint includes three localized child publications for three countries such as the U.K., Mexico, and France, the alternative text for the same asset in each of these child publications may specify English text for the U.K. child publication, Spanish text for the Mexico child publication, and French text for the French child publication.



FIG. 3A illustrates an exemplary hierarchical model 300 of publications. The hierarchical model 300 is shown as comprising global content (e.g., assets) 305, a plurality of products 310A-D, which may inherit assets from the global content 305, and a plurality of microsites 315A-C, which may inherit assets from one or more of the plurality of products 310A-D. The global content 305 may include assets of external content libraries that reside on external content repositories. The hierarchical model 300 is shown as also comprising a “.com” website 320, which may inherit assets from any of the microsites 315A-C.


Linkages or relationships between publications (e.g., microsites, products, websites, etc.) may be included in the blueprint. The blueprint comprises rules for managing assets utilized by each of the publications in the hierarchical model 300. These linkages are shown as arrows extending between publications. For example, product 310A and product 310B may be linked to microsite 315A such that changes in assets to either product 310A and/or product 310B may inherit down to microsite 315A.


It is noteworthy to mention that in a hierarchical model, changes in assets for a child publication (e.g., a publication that is vertically disposed below another publication in the hierarchy), such as with the localization of an asset, may not result in automatic inheritance of those changes vertically to a parent publication. For example, changes in an asset of the microsite 315A may not cause a corresponding change in the same asset on the product 310A or product 310B. Additionally, this change at the child level may break the linkage between the child publication and the parent publication, at least with respect to the asset.



FIG. 3B illustrates an exemplary semantic model 325 of publications. The semantic model 325 may include global content 330, which includes assets that are to be utilized in the web marketing campaign. In contrast with the global content of the hierarchical model of FIG. 3A, the global content 330 is conceptually the locus/corpus of assets for a plurality of publications. Rather than having to inherit assets from a parent publication, each publication may receive assets directly from the global content 330. Again, the global content 330 may include assets of external content libraries that reside on external content repositories. Thus, the semantic model allows for multiple inheritance features for child publications.


Thus, various product publications, microsites, and websites may be interrelated with one another using a semantic model such that the global content 330 is central to the model.


Additionally, a publication in the semantic model 325 can have parent/child relationships with other publications within the system. Advantageously, a publication in a semantic model can be both a parent and a child, which allows sharing of assets both from and to other publications. A child publication can have multiple parents, and when this occurs a prioritization (e.g., priority rules) can be established that determine which parent has first priority for sharing assets with the dependent publication. Changes made in the parent publication may affect all, or a portion, of the child publications. However, changes made at the child level may or may not affect the parent publication(s).



FIG. 4 is an exemplary user interface in the form of a hierarchical model map 400. The map 400 represents an exemplary use case where a hierarchical model has been utilized to establish relationships between various publications. In this example, marketing content has been localized in .COM at Level 3. Because marketing content was created at Level 2 in the global content publication, it has also been shared with the microsite publication however it is not localized but directly inherited with the microsite. This map 400 also demonstrates how content can be inherited, localized and shared within a hierarchical model. This map 400 may be made available for content authors who have permission to view the marketing content, allowing for a quick view of where assets are coming from, where the assets have been inherited and localized, and the identity of the content author who created the asset.


According to some embodiments, a blueprint model may be combined with taxonomies for assets, allowing content authors to publish “smart” content for their customers. Categories and keywords within the taxonomy model follow the blueprint model rules, giving business organizations flexibility when defining asset related tagging guidelines based on the needs of their clients—whether the need be cultural, language, and/or product availability.



FIG. 5 illustrates inheritance and localization of assets between parent and child publications within a hierarchical model of publications, using a blueprint. A parent publication 505, shown here as a web page that includes a text asset 510 and a media asset (also referred to as an image asset) 515. Based upon rules contained in the blueprint, a child publication 520 is shown as inheriting the same image asset 515, while the text asset has been localized by translating the text asset from English into French to produce a localized text asset 525.


Rather than translating the child publication 520 manually, the blueprint may instruct the content manager 110 to automatically localize the text asset. Thus, when the text asset 510 of the parent publication 505 is modified, the content manager 110 may utilize the blueprint to determine that an automatic translation of the updated text asset is required for localization.


According to some embodiments, the image asset 515 may be an asset that is stored in an external content library 125. Thus, the blueprint that governs the parent and child publications 505 and 520, may also include mappings of the image asset that is stored in the external content library to both the parent publication 505 and the child publication 520. As mentioned above, the mapping of assets for a publication (e.g., web content) may be determined by the asset mapper module 145 (see FIG. 1).


It will be understood that the rules for managing the relationship between the parent publication 505 and the child publication 520 may require that text content be localized by translation into French, while image assets are inherited. While this example is rudimentary, it is descriptive of the effects of a blueprint relative to how assets are shared between publications in a hierarchical or semantic model. In other examples, the rules for the blueprint may require translation any time a publication is intended to be provisioned to an audience that speaks a different language from the language used to create the parent publication. Other rules may comprise changing the color, layout, or other aesthetic portions of a child publication. Again, the rules included in the blueprint may be used to ensure that child publications are culturally, linguistically, contextually, or otherwise relevant to their intended audience.


Once a blueprint has been established for a web marketing campaign, changes in an asset in a publication may be automatically shared and/or inherited to dependent (e.g. child or laterally related) publications according to the blueprint by executing the blueprinting module 165. The automatic inheritance of asset changes using the blueprint via the blueprinting module 165 may enhance the effectiveness of the web marketing campaign by ensuring that branding, assets, and other content included in publications are consistently maintained across the publications of a web marketing campaign without requiring manual updating of each publication.



FIG. 6 is a flowchart of an exemplary method 600 for managing a web-based marketing campaign using a blueprint. The method 600 may comprise a step 605 of establishing a blueprint for a web-based marketing campaign using a content management system. According to some embodiments, the blueprint may comprise rules for managing assets utilized by at least a portion of a plurality of publications of a hierarchical model of the web-based marketing campaign. It will be understood that the plurality of publications may comprise at least one parent publication and at least one child publication. Additionally, at least a portion of the assets utilized by the hierarchical model may be stored on an external content library.


In some embodiments, the method 600 may comprise a step 610 of determining a change in at least one asset for the at least one parent publication. Once a change in at least one asset has been determined, the method may then comprise a step 615 of automatically sharing and/or inheriting the change in the at least one asset for the at least one parent publication to the at least one child publication according to the blueprint.



FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary computing system 700 that may be used to implement an embodiment of the present technology. The computing system 700 of FIG. 7 may be implemented in the contexts of the likes of computing systems, networks, exchanges, servers, or combinations thereof disclosed herein. The computing system 700 of FIG. 7 includes one or more processors 710 and main memory 720. Main memory 720 stores, in part, instructions and data for execution by processor 710. Main memory 720 may store the executable code when in operation. The system 700 of FIG. 7 further includes a mass storage device 730, portable storage medium drive(s) 740, output devices 750, user input devices 760, a graphics display 770, and peripheral devices 780.


The components shown in FIG. 7 are depicted as being connected via a single bus 790. The components may be connected through one or more data transport means. Processor unit 710 and main memory 720 may be connected via a local microprocessor bus, and the mass storage device 730, peripheral device(s) 780, portable storage device 740, and graphics display 770 may be connected via one or more input/output (I/O) buses.


Mass storage device 730, which may be implemented with a magnetic disk drive or an optical disk drive, is a non-volatile storage device for storing data and instructions for use by processor unit 710. Mass storage device 730 may store the system software for implementing embodiments of the present technology for purposes of loading that software into main memory 720.


Portable storage device 740 operates in conjunction with a portable non-volatile storage medium, such as a floppy disk, compact disk, digital video disc, or USB storage device, to input and output data and code to and from the computing system 700 of FIG. 7. The system software for implementing embodiments of the present technology may be stored on such a portable medium and input to the computing system 700 via the portable storage device 740.


Input devices 760 provide a portion of a user interface. Input devices 760 may include an alphanumeric keypad, such as a keyboard, for inputting alpha-numeric and other information, or a pointing device, such as a mouse, a trackball, stylus, or cursor direction keys. Additionally, the system 700 as shown in FIG. 7 includes output devices 750. Suitable output devices include speakers, printers, network interfaces, and monitors.


Graphics display 770 may include a liquid crystal display (LCD) or other suitable display device. Graphics display 770 receives textual and graphical information, and processes the information for output to the display device.


Peripherals devices 780 may include any type of computer support device to add additional functionality to the computing system. Peripheral device(s) 780 may include a modem or a router.


The components provided in the computing system 700 of FIG. 7 are those typically found in computing systems that may be suitable for use with embodiments of the present technology and are intended to represent a broad category of such computer components that are well known in the art. Thus, the computing system 700 of FIG. 7 may be a personal computer, hand held computing system, telephone, mobile computing system, workstation, server, minicomputer, mainframe computer, or any other computing system. The computer may also include different bus configurations, networked platforms, multi-processor platforms, etc. Various operating systems may be used including Unix, Linux, Windows, Macintosh OS, Palm OS, Android, iPhone OS and other suitable operating systems.


It is noteworthy that any hardware platform suitable for performing the processing described herein is suitable for use with the technology. Computer-readable storage media refer to any medium or media that participate in providing instructions to a central processing unit (CPU), a processor, a microcontroller, or the like. Such media may take forms including, but not limited to, non-volatile and volatile media such as optical or magnetic disks and dynamic memory, respectively. Common forms of computer-readable storage media include a floppy disk, a flexible disk, a hard disk, magnetic tape, any other magnetic storage medium, a CD-ROM disk, digital video disk (DVD), any other optical storage medium, RAM, PROM, EPROM, a FLASHEPROM, any other memory chip or cartridge.


While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. The descriptions are not intended to limit the scope of the technology to the particular forms set forth herein. Thus, the breadth and scope of a preferred embodiment should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments. It should be understood that the above description is illustrative and not restrictive. To the contrary, the present descriptions are intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the technology as defined by the appended claims and otherwise appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art. The scope of the technology should, therefore, be determined not with reference to the above description, but instead should be determined with reference to the appended claims along with their full scope of equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A method for managing a plurality of web-based and non-web publications using a blueprint, the method comprising: establishing a blueprint for a plurality of web-based publications and non-web publications using a content management system, the blueprint comprising rules for managing linkages of a plurality of assets between a plurality of publications of a hierarchical model of publications, the plurality of assets utilized by at least a portion of the publications,the plurality of publications comprising at least one parent publication and at least one child publication treated as a parent/child structure that can hide, inherit, localize and publish data,the blueprint rules further comprising rules for localizing assets including rules for whether to automatically translate changes in the assets for the at least one child publication without manual translation,rules for determining based on a type of the assets whether to inherit the changes in the assets in an unmodified format, including without translation of the asset changes, between the parent and the at least one child publications, andrules for determining based on content of the assets whether to inherit the changes in the assets in an unmodified manner, including without translation of the asset changes, between the parent and child publications,at least a portion of the plurality of assets utilized by the hierarchical model being stored on an external content library mapped to the content management system via a network, the assets on the external content library owned by a plurality of different owners, wherein the external content library is registered and mapped by: registering the external content library with the content management system using an external content provider module, whereby one or more content authors must present or verify their identity before accessing assets that reside on the external content library; andmapping assets of the external content library for use within the content management system; andat least a portion of the plurality of assets utilized by the hierarchical model being stored locally on the content management system on a local content repository;periodically evaluating the assets of the external content library to detect a change in at least one asset of the plurality of assets stored on the external content library for the at least one parent publication;using the blueprint rules for the linkages and localizing assets to determine whether to automatically translate at least a portion of the change in the at least one asset across multiple websites for the at least one parent publication to the at least one child publication without translating manually; andusing the blueprint rules for the linkages and localizing assets to determine whether to automatically inherit at least an unmodified portion of the change including without translation of the portion of the change, in the at least one asset across multiple websites for the at least one parent publication to the at least one child publication.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the external content library is registered and mapped to the content management system.
  • 3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the mapping of the assets of the external content library for use within the content management system by an asset mapper module occurs at intervals to ensure that the assets are available and properly linked to web content.
  • 4. The method according to claim 1, wherein localizing comprises any of translation, hiding, inheriting, pushing, or any combinations thereof, of assets for a publication.
  • 5. The method according to claim 1, wherein a publication comprises any of assets, templates, functionalities, keywords, metadata, workflows, or any combinations thereof.
  • 6. The method according to claim 1, further comprising, upon selection of an asset from the external content library via the content management system, mapping the selected asset from the external content library into web content being created on the content management system.
  • 7. The method according to claim 1, wherein a blueprint rule for automatically localizing a change in a video asset that includes text metadata to reflect specific attributes of the asset associated with the at least one child publication comprises: automatically inheriting images of the video without modification,automatically inheriting at least a portion of changes to the text metadata without translating the inherited portions of the changes to the text metadata, andautomatically translating at least a portion of text metadata of the metadata not automatically inherited into a language of the at least one child publication without manual translation.
  • 8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the external content library includes assets for a plurality of owners and individual assets on the external content library are owned by different owners.
  • 9. The method according to claim 1, further comprising tracking usage of assets stored on the external content library and providing usage information for the assets to respective owners of the assets.
  • 10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the blueprint rules further comprise rules for localizing text in the at least one asset to that of a language of one of the multiple websites.
  • 11. The method according to claim 1, wherein the blueprint rules further comprises rules for localizing a text asset of the at least one asset by translating the text asset from a first language to a second language, to produce a localized text asset in one of the multiple websites.
  • 12. The method according to claim 1, wherein the non-web publications are for mobile, social media, and tablet platforms.
  • 13. The method according to claim 1, wherein when a content author selects an asset from the external content library for inclusion in a creation of web content via a graphical user interface, a second mapping is executed by linking the selected asset to the web content being created by the content author.
  • 14. A method for managing a web-based and non-web based marketing campaign using a blueprint, the method comprising: establishing a blueprint for a web-based marketing campaign using a content management system, the blueprint comprising rules for managing linkages for video assets between a plurality of publications of a semantic model of the web-based and non-web based marketing campaign the video assets including text metadata shown by at least a portion of the plurality of publications, the blueprint further comprising additional rules for when to inherit at least a portion of changes in the video assets and when to automatically translate at least a portion of the changes in the video assets for each of the plurality of publications, at least a portion of the video assets being stored on an external content library and mapped to the content management system via a network, wherein the external content library is registered and mapped by: registering the external content library with the content management system using an external content provider module, whereby one or more content authors must present or verify their identity before accessing assets that reside on the external content library; andmapping assets of the external content library for use within the content management system;continually evaluating the assets of the external content library to detect a change in at least one asset for at least one of the plurality of publications; andusing the blueprint rules for the linkages and localizing assets to determine: when to automatically translate without manual translation at least a portion of the change in the text metadata of at least one video asset across multiple websites for at least one parent publication to at least one child publication,when to automatically inherit in an unmodified format, including without translation at least a portion of the change in the text metadata of the at least one video asset for the at least one of the plurality of publications to a dependent publication, andwhen to automatically translate at least a portion of the text metadata not automatically inherited into a language of the at least one child publication without manual translation.
  • 15. The method according to claim 14, wherein the external content library is virtually mounted to the content management system such that assets located on the external content library are accessible through the content management system similarly to local assets of a local content repository associated with the content management system.
  • 16. The method according to claim 14, wherein the semantic model comprises a plurality of parent publications and a plurality of dependent publications.
  • 17. The method according to claim 16, wherein when a dependent publication has two or more parent publications, the rules for managing assets included in the blueprint comprise a priority for each parent publication that determines an order for asset inheritance from between the two or more parent publications to the dependent publication.
  • 18. A content management system for managing a web-based and non-web based marketing campaign using a blueprint, the system comprising: a memory for storing executable instructions; anda processor for executing the executable instructions, the executable instructions comprising: a plurality of external content provider modules each communicatively coupled via a network to an individual external content library;a blueprinting module that establishes a blueprint for a web-based and non-web marketing campaign using a content management system, the blueprint comprising rules for managing linkages of assets between at least a portion of a plurality of publications of a hierarchical model of the web-based marketing campaign utilizing the assets,the plurality of publications comprising a parent publication and a child publication, at least a portion of the assets utilized by the hierarchical model being stored on an external content library,the blueprint further comprising:localizing rules for automatically translating without manual translation changes in assets between the parent and child publications, andinheritance rules for: automatically inheriting in an unmodified format, including without the manual translation changes in the assets between the parent and child publications, based on a type of the assets, andautomatically inheriting at least a portion of the changes to text metadata in an unmodified manner, including without translating the inherited portions of the changes to the text metadata, based on content of the portion of the changes; andan asset manager module that receives a change in an asset mapped from the external content library to the asset manager module for the parent publication, wherein the blueprinting module uses the linkage rules and the inheritance rules to automatically inherit in an unmodified form, including without translation of at least a portion of the change in the asset between the parent publication and the child publication, and uses the linkage rules and the localizing rules to automatically translate without manual translation the at least a portion of the change in the asset from the parent publication to the child publication and wherein the external content library is registered and mapped by: registering the external content library with the content management system using an external content provider module, whereby one or more content authors must present or verify their identity before accessing assets that reside on the external content library; andmapping assets of the external content library for use within the content management system.
  • 19. The system according to claim 18, wherein the external content library is registered and mapped to the content management system via an external content provider module.
  • 20. The system according to claim 19, wherein the external content provider module registers the external content library with the content management system and an asset mapper module maps the assets of the external content library for use within the content management system, and wherein the mapping of the assets of the external content library occurs at intervals to ensure that the assets are available and properly linked to web content.
  • 21. The system according to claim 20, wherein upon selection of an asset from the external content library via the content management system, the asset mapper module maps the selected asset from the external content library into the web content being created on the content management system.
  • 22. The system according to claim 18, wherein the localizing rules comprises any rule of translation, hiding, inheriting, pushing, or any combinations thereof, of assets for a publication.
  • 23. The system according to claim 18, wherein a publication comprises any of assets, templates, functionalities, keywords, metadata, workflows, or any combinations thereof.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/619,591, filed Sep. 14, 2012, entitled “Blueprinting of Multimedia Assets.” The disclosure of the aforementioned application is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (463)
Number Name Date Kind
4845658 Gifford Jul 1989 A
4916614 Kaji Apr 1990 A
4920499 Skeirik Apr 1990 A
5075850 Asahioka et al. Dec 1991 A
5295068 Nishino et al. Mar 1994 A
5351189 Doi Sep 1994 A
5418717 Su et al. May 1995 A
5477451 Brown et al. Dec 1995 A
5497319 Chong et al. Mar 1996 A
5640575 Maruyama Jun 1997 A
5644775 Thompson et al. Jul 1997 A
5675802 Allen et al. Oct 1997 A
5708780 Levergood et al. Jan 1998 A
5715314 Payne et al. Feb 1998 A
5724424 Gifford Mar 1998 A
5751957 Hiroya et al. May 1998 A
5774868 Cragun et al. Jun 1998 A
5812776 Gifford Sep 1998 A
5813007 Nielsen Sep 1998 A
5873056 Liddy Feb 1999 A
5884097 Li et al. Mar 1999 A
5884246 Boucher et al. Mar 1999 A
5894554 Lowery et al. Apr 1999 A
5895446 Takeda et al. Apr 1999 A
5909492 Payne et al. Jun 1999 A
5966685 Flanagan et al. Oct 1999 A
5974372 Barnes Oct 1999 A
5978828 Greer et al. Nov 1999 A
5987401 Trudeau Nov 1999 A
5987402 Murata et al. Nov 1999 A
6026413 Challenger et al. Feb 2000 A
6041333 Bretschneider et al. Mar 2000 A
6041360 Himmel et al. Mar 2000 A
6044344 Kanevsky Mar 2000 A
6049785 Gifford Apr 2000 A
6085162 Cherny Jul 2000 A
6092035 Kurachi et al. Jul 2000 A
6108703 Leighton et al. Aug 2000 A
6122666 Beurket et al. Sep 2000 A
6128652 Toh et al. Oct 2000 A
6128655 Fields et al. Oct 2000 A
6161082 Goldberg et al. Dec 2000 A
6163785 Carbonell et al. Dec 2000 A
6195649 Gifford Feb 2001 B1
6199051 Gifford Mar 2001 B1
6205437 Gifford Mar 2001 B1
6212634 Geer et al. Apr 2001 B1
6216212 Challenger et al. Apr 2001 B1
6219818 Freivald et al. Apr 2001 B1
6256712 Challenger et al. Jul 2001 B1
6263332 Nasr et al. Jul 2001 B1
6278969 King et al. Aug 2001 B1
6279112 O'toole, Jr. et al. Aug 2001 B1
6330566 Durham Dec 2001 B1
6330598 Beckwith et al. Dec 2001 B1
6338033 Bourbonnais et al. Jan 2002 B1
6347316 Redpath Feb 2002 B1
6356865 Franz et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356903 Baxter et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363337 Amith Mar 2002 B1
6401105 Carlin et al. Jun 2002 B1
6415257 Junqua Jul 2002 B1
6438540 Nasr et al. Aug 2002 B2
6449599 Payne et al. Sep 2002 B1
6477524 Taskiran Nov 2002 B1
6477575 Koeppel et al. Nov 2002 B1
6490358 Geer et al. Dec 2002 B1
6490563 Hon Dec 2002 B2
6526426 Lakritz Feb 2003 B1
6581061 Graham Jun 2003 B2
6623529 Lakritz Sep 2003 B1
6658627 Gallup Dec 2003 B1
6725333 Degenaro et al. Apr 2004 B1
6748569 Brooke et al. Jun 2004 B1
6782384 Sloan et al. Aug 2004 B2
6865528 Huang Mar 2005 B1
6920419 Kitamura Jul 2005 B2
6973656 Huynh et al. Dec 2005 B1
6976207 Rujan Dec 2005 B1
6990439 Xun Jan 2006 B2
7013264 Dolan Mar 2006 B2
7031908 Huang Apr 2006 B1
7050964 Menzes May 2006 B2
7076494 Baer Jul 2006 B1
7089493 Hatori et al. Aug 2006 B2
7111229 Nicholas et al. Sep 2006 B2
7124092 O'toole, Jr. et al. Oct 2006 B2
7177792 Knight Feb 2007 B2
7191447 Ellis et al. Mar 2007 B1
7207005 Laktritz Apr 2007 B2
7209875 Quirk Apr 2007 B2
7249013 Al-Onaizan Jul 2007 B2
7249314 Walker et al. Jul 2007 B2
7272639 Levergood et al. Sep 2007 B1
7295962 Marcu Nov 2007 B2
7295963 Richardson et al. Nov 2007 B2
7302429 Wanker Nov 2007 B1
7333927 Lee Feb 2008 B2
7340388 Soricut Mar 2008 B2
7353165 Zhou Apr 2008 B2
7369984 Fairweather May 2008 B2
7383320 Silberstein et al. Jun 2008 B1
7389222 Langmead Jun 2008 B1
7389223 Atkin Jun 2008 B2
7448040 Ellis et al. Nov 2008 B2
7454326 Marcu Nov 2008 B2
7464086 Black et al. Dec 2008 B2
7509313 Colledge Mar 2009 B2
7516062 Chen et al. Apr 2009 B2
7533013 Marcu May 2009 B2
7606814 Deily et al. Oct 2009 B2
7620538 Marcu Nov 2009 B2
7620549 Di Cristo Nov 2009 B2
7624005 Koehn Nov 2009 B2
7668782 Reistad et al. Feb 2010 B1
7680647 Moore Mar 2010 B2
7698126 Kohlmeier et al. Apr 2010 B2
7716037 Precoda May 2010 B2
7734459 Menezes Jun 2010 B2
7739102 Bender Jun 2010 B2
7739286 Sethy Jun 2010 B2
7788087 Corston-Oliver Aug 2010 B2
7813918 Muslea Oct 2010 B2
7836057 Micaelian et al. Nov 2010 B1
7836110 Schoenbach et al. Nov 2010 B1
7865358 Green Jan 2011 B2
7904595 Cheng et al. Mar 2011 B2
7925493 Watanabe Apr 2011 B2
7945437 Mount et al. May 2011 B2
7949633 Shaver et al. May 2011 B1
7958453 Taing Jun 2011 B1
7983896 Ross Jul 2011 B2
7983897 Chin Jul 2011 B2
8015222 Abnous et al. Sep 2011 B2
8036929 Reisman Oct 2011 B1
8078450 Anisimovich et al. Dec 2011 B2
8135575 Dean Mar 2012 B1
8185830 Saha et al. May 2012 B2
8195447 Anismovich Jun 2012 B2
8214196 Yamada Jul 2012 B2
8239186 Chin Aug 2012 B2
8239207 Seligman Aug 2012 B2
8260846 Lahav Sep 2012 B2
8286185 Ellis et al. Oct 2012 B2
8296127 Marcu Oct 2012 B2
8296463 Cheng et al. Oct 2012 B2
8346585 Griffith et al. Jan 2013 B1
8352244 Gao et al. Jan 2013 B2
8364463 Miyamoto Jan 2013 B2
8386234 Uchimoto et al. Feb 2013 B2
8413045 Lemonik et al. Apr 2013 B2
8423346 Seo et al. Apr 2013 B2
8442812 Ehsani May 2013 B2
8453052 Newman et al. May 2013 B1
8489980 Lakritz Jul 2013 B2
8521506 Lancaster et al. Aug 2013 B2
8527260 Best Sep 2013 B2
8548794 Koehn Oct 2013 B2
8554591 Reistad et al. Oct 2013 B2
8594992 Kuhn et al. Nov 2013 B2
8600728 Knight Dec 2013 B2
8606900 Levergood et al. Dec 2013 B1
8612203 Foster Dec 2013 B2
8615388 Li Dec 2013 B2
8635327 Levergood et al. Jan 2014 B1
8635539 Young Jan 2014 B2
8666725 Och Mar 2014 B2
8671214 Lockhart et al. Mar 2014 B2
8676804 Janos et al. Mar 2014 B1
8683329 Tang et al. Mar 2014 B2
8688454 Zheng Apr 2014 B2
8725496 Zhao May 2014 B2
8768686 Sarikaya et al. Jul 2014 B2
8775154 Clinchant Jul 2014 B2
8799200 Lahav Aug 2014 B2
8818790 He et al. Aug 2014 B2
8843359 Lauder Sep 2014 B2
8862456 Krack et al. Oct 2014 B2
8898052 Waibel Nov 2014 B2
8903707 Zhao Dec 2014 B2
8909683 Ledet Dec 2014 B1
8930176 Li Jan 2015 B2
8935148 Christ Jan 2015 B2
8935149 Zhang Jan 2015 B2
8935150 Christ Jan 2015 B2
8935706 Ellis et al. Jan 2015 B2
8954539 Lahav Feb 2015 B2
8972268 Waibel Mar 2015 B2
9026425 Nikoulina May 2015 B2
9053202 Viswanadha Jun 2015 B2
9081762 Wu Jul 2015 B2
9092405 Hayden Jul 2015 B1
9141606 Marciano Sep 2015 B2
9176952 Aikawa Nov 2015 B2
9183192 Ruby, Jr. Nov 2015 B1
9183198 Shen et al. Nov 2015 B2
9201870 Jurach Dec 2015 B2
9208144 Abdulnasyrov Dec 2015 B1
9317622 Zuromski et al. Apr 2016 B1
9336487 Lahav May 2016 B2
9369489 Kato Jun 2016 B2
9396184 Roy Jul 2016 B2
9396436 Lahav Jul 2016 B2
9430449 Leblond et al. Aug 2016 B2
9465797 Ji Oct 2016 B2
9471563 Trese Oct 2016 B2
9471920 Kolkowitz et al. Oct 2016 B2
9519640 Perez Dec 2016 B2
9519682 Pujara et al. Dec 2016 B1
9547626 de Voogd Jan 2017 B2
9552355 Dymetman Jan 2017 B2
9596188 Cheng et al. Mar 2017 B2
9600473 Leydon Mar 2017 B2
9613026 Hodson Apr 2017 B2
9773270 Costa et al. Sep 2017 B2
9781050 Cheng et al. Oct 2017 B2
9954794 Cheng et al. Apr 2018 B2
10007646 Colborn et al. Jun 2018 B1
10025776 Sjoberg et al. Jul 2018 B1
10061749 Homer et al. Aug 2018 B2
10452740 Leblond et al. Oct 2019 B2
10521492 Homer et al. Dec 2019 B2
10572928 Costa et al. Feb 2020 B2
10580015 Erasmus et al. Mar 2020 B2
10614167 Bondarchuk et al. Apr 2020 B2
10657540 Martchenko et al. May 2020 B2
10678866 Ranganathan et al. Jun 2020 B1
10990644 Homer et al. Apr 2021 B2
11044949 Homer et al. Jun 2021 B2
11080493 Bondarchuk et al. Aug 2021 B2
11182455 Siddiquee et al. Nov 2021 B2
20010029507 Nojima Oct 2001 A1
20020007383 Yoden et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020010590 Lee Jan 2002 A1
20020023101 Kurihara et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020046018 Marcu Apr 2002 A1
20020065848 Walker et al. May 2002 A1
20020083103 Ballance Jun 2002 A1
20020103698 Cantrell Aug 2002 A1
20020112013 Walsh Aug 2002 A1
20020120762 Cheng et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020124109 Brown Sep 2002 A1
20020178166 Hsia Nov 2002 A1
20020178257 Cerrato Nov 2002 A1
20020193983 Tokieda et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030009320 Furuta Jan 2003 A1
20030023757 Ishioka et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030158953 Lal Aug 2003 A1
20030163346 Tinti et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030200094 Gupta Oct 2003 A1
20040010496 Behrendt et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015723 Pham et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040019849 Weng et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040034520 Langkilde-Geary Feb 2004 A1
20040039593 Eskandar Feb 2004 A1
20040044517 Palmquist Mar 2004 A1
20040044576 Kurihara et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040068435 Braunzell Apr 2004 A1
20040148409 Davis et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040187090 Meacham Sep 2004 A1
20040255281 Imamura et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050039116 Slack-Smith Feb 2005 A1
20050086105 McFadden et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050156714 McCarthy et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050171944 Palmquist Aug 2005 A1
20050187774 Vuong Aug 2005 A1
20050189415 Fano et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050203884 Allen et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050228865 Hirsch Oct 2005 A1
20050235351 Seltzer et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050246283 Gwiazda et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060041558 McCauley Feb 2006 A1
20060053367 Chen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060080257 Vaughan et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060080265 Hinds et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060080397 Chene et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060095443 Kumar et al. May 2006 A1
20060095526 Levergood et al. May 2006 A1
20060178918 Mikurak Aug 2006 A1
20060248442 Rosenstein et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060282255 Lu Dec 2006 A1
20070016363 Huang et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070022003 Chao et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070033104 Collins et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070043553 Dolan Feb 2007 A1
20070047781 Hull et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070048714 Plastina et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070083425 Cousineau et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070112553 Jacobson May 2007 A1
20070118545 Chandrasekharan et al. May 2007 A1
20070192374 Abnous Aug 2007 A1
20070208991 Rider Sep 2007 A1
20070209005 Shaver et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070209080 Ture et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070226058 Lorenzen et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070234213 Krikorian et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080028300 Krieger Jan 2008 A1
20080086298 Anismovich Apr 2008 A1
20080109374 Levergood et al. May 2008 A1
20080120089 Schurig May 2008 A1
20080120090 Schurig May 2008 A1
20080120120 Cirulli et al. May 2008 A1
20080154577 Kim Jun 2008 A1
20080195664 Maharajh et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080201344 Levergood et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080209320 Mawhinney et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080244053 Sampson et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080256235 Or Sim Oct 2008 A1
20080270398 Landau et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080288240 D'Agostini et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080316228 Seljavaara Dec 2008 A1
20090061764 Lockhart et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090094017 Chen et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090099931 Aaltonen et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090138458 Wanker May 2009 A1
20090171780 Aldrey et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090197580 Gupta et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090217196 Neff et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090217352 Shen et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090234711 Ramer Sep 2009 A1
20090240539 Slawson Sep 2009 A1
20090248801 Then et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090259684 Knight et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090313005 Jaquinta Dec 2009 A1
20090313245 Weyl et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100017704 Jaffe et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023475 Lahav Jan 2010 A1
20100023581 Lahav Jan 2010 A1
20100057439 Ideuchi et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100057561 Gifford Mar 2010 A1
20100070364 Dugan Mar 2010 A1
20100070843 Duym Mar 2010 A1
20100070847 Hampton et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100121630 Mende et al. May 2010 A1
20100153404 Ghosh et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100179803 Sawaf Jul 2010 A1
20100211865 Fanning et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100217783 Farver et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100233996 Herz et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100242069 Jung et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100257457 De Goes Oct 2010 A1
20100274661 Aaltonen et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100281008 Braunwarth Nov 2010 A1
20100305940 Dendi et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100306402 Russell et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100312619 Ala-Pietila et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110010243 Wilburn et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110022381 Gao Jan 2011 A1
20110047468 Ishizaka Feb 2011 A1
20110060998 Schwartz et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110066469 Kadosh Mar 2011 A1
20110078626 Bachman et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110097693 Crawford Apr 2011 A1
20110099077 Darin et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110125783 Whale et al. May 2011 A1
20110161312 Wallman Jun 2011 A1
20110191458 Cheng et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110264736 Zuckerberg et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110270975 Troup Nov 2011 A1
20110313754 Bastide et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110320395 Dada Dec 2011 A1
20120016655 Travieso Jan 2012 A1
20120022852 Tregaskis Jan 2012 A1
20120023129 Vedula et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120042006 Kiley et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120096366 Narla et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120131441 Jitkoff et al. May 2012 A1
20120136718 Katti May 2012 A1
20120143816 Zhang et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120158485 Ogawa Jun 2012 A1
20120185759 Balinsky et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120197718 Martchenko et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120197770 Raheja et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120197957 de Voogd Aug 2012 A1
20120198351 Lee et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120203861 Flack et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120216108 Yambal et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120221319 Trese Aug 2012 A1
20120221407 Erasmus et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120226818 Atas et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120233665 Ranganathan et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120266076 Lockhart et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120330644 Giraudy et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120330990 Chen et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130031470 Daly, Jr. et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130036202 Lahav Feb 2013 A1
20130054404 Garcia Feb 2013 A1
20130067055 Cheng et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130091014 Kellogg Apr 2013 A1
20130097488 Coman et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130124185 Sarr et al. May 2013 A1
20130124987 Lakritz May 2013 A1
20130144566 De Biswas Jun 2013 A1
20130151940 Bailor et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130173247 Hodson Jul 2013 A1
20130238392 Sloan Sep 2013 A1
20130262986 Leblond et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130282859 McDonald Oct 2013 A1
20130304607 Costa et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130325442 Dahlmeier Dec 2013 A1
20130326345 Haggart et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140019625 Cheng et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140058718 Kunchukuttan Feb 2014 A1
20140082032 Leblond et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140087760 Bennett Mar 2014 A1
20140114864 Babich Apr 2014 A1
20140142917 D'Penha May 2014 A1
20140142918 Dotterer May 2014 A1
20140173414 Chan et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140181013 Micucci et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140188993 Klein et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140229257 Reistad et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140236942 Li Aug 2014 A1
20140250369 Mitnick et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140278342 Shoshan et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140282977 Madhu et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140297252 Prasad et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140297759 Mody Oct 2014 A1
20140298483 Kato Oct 2014 A1
20140303956 Wilson Oct 2014 A1
20140304080 Yilmaz Oct 2014 A1
20140310229 Lahav Oct 2014 A1
20140351053 Link Nov 2014 A1
20140358519 Mirkin Dec 2014 A1
20140358524 Papula Dec 2014 A1
20140365201 Gao Dec 2014 A1
20150040000 Rice et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150051896 Simard Feb 2015 A1
20150052424 Sikchi et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150074518 Rumsey et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150106390 Fuchs Apr 2015 A1
20150127660 Zilberberg et al. May 2015 A1
20150149455 Whitley, Jr. May 2015 A1
20150149885 Homer et al. May 2015 A1
20150149886 Homer et al. May 2015 A1
20150186362 Li Jul 2015 A1
20150188961 Ricci Jul 2015 A1
20150213259 Du et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150213363 Lahav Jul 2015 A1
20150248484 Yu et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150254732 Snyder Sep 2015 A1
20150310504 Potter Oct 2015 A1
20160014088 Maekawa Jan 2016 A1
20160019546 Eisen Jan 2016 A1
20160057195 Jaskiewicz Feb 2016 A1
20160155178 Konaiyagarri et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160239496 Motte et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160248785 Petry et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160275057 Dendi et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160283952 Hall Sep 2016 A1
20160371693 Kolkowitz et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170124069 Bondarchuk et al. May 2017 A1
20170149683 Cheng et al. May 2017 A1
20170235848 Van Dusen et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170337614 Costa et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180314674 Homer et al. Nov 2018 A1
20190065514 Siddiquee et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190158567 Siddiquee et al. May 2019 A1
20190163459 Sreenivasa et al. May 2019 A1
20200104343 Homer et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200151740 Martchenko et al. May 2020 A1
20200167529 Bondarchuk et al. May 2020 A1
20220043868 Siddiquee et al. Feb 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (84)
Number Date Country
5240198 May 1998 AU
694367 Jul 1998 AU
5202299 Oct 1999 AU
2221506 Dec 1996 CA
102193914 Sep 2011 CN
102662935 Sep 2012 CN
102902667 Jan 2013 CN
69525374 Aug 2002 DE
69431306 May 2003 DE
69633564 Nov 2005 DE
0830774 Mar 1998 EP
1128301 Aug 2001 EP
1128302 Aug 2001 EP
1128303 Aug 2001 EP
0803103 Feb 2002 EP
1235177 Aug 2002 EP
0734556 Sep 2002 EP
0830774 Oct 2004 EP
1489523 Dec 2004 EP
1170680 Aug 2005 EP
2299369 Mar 2011 EP
2668599 Dec 2013 EP
2668626 Dec 2013 EP
2678814 Jan 2014 EP
2896007 Jul 2015 EP
2896008 Jul 2015 EP
2896007 Jul 2020 EP
2241359 Aug 1991 GB
H10509543 Sep 1998 JP
H11507752 Jul 1999 JP
2001117847 Apr 2001 JP
2001136583 May 2001 JP
3190881 Jul 2001 JP
3190882 Jul 2001 JP
2001188992 Jul 2001 JP
2001350790 Dec 2001 JP
3260693 Feb 2002 JP
2002073677 Mar 2002 JP
2002132822 May 2002 JP
3367675 Jan 2003 JP
2003032660 Jan 2003 JP
2003157402 May 2003 JP
2003216608 Jul 2003 JP
2004538542 Dec 2004 JP
2005056080 Mar 2005 JP
2005174120 Jun 2005 JP
2005267535 Sep 2005 JP
3762882 Apr 2006 JP
2006216073 Aug 2006 JP
2006260329 Sep 2006 JP
2007042127 Feb 2007 JP
2008027265 Feb 2008 JP
2009020845 Jan 2009 JP
2009518761 May 2009 JP
2009538489 Nov 2009 JP
2009301480 Dec 2009 JP
4485548 Jun 2010 JP
2010152588 Jul 2010 JP
2011002905 Jan 2011 JP
4669373 Apr 2011 JP
4669430 Apr 2011 JP
5952307 Jul 2016 JP
5952312 Jul 2016 JP
6138054 Jun 2017 JP
WO9516971 Jun 1995 WO
WO9613013 May 1996 WO
WO9642041 Dec 1996 WO
WO9715885 May 1997 WO
WO9819224 May 1998 WO
WO9952626 Oct 1999 WO
WO2002039318 May 2002 WO
WO20030081441 Feb 2003 WO
WO-2004057464 Jul 2004 WO
WO2007068123 Jun 2007 WO
WO20070118424 Oct 2007 WO
WO2010062540 Jun 2010 WO
WO2010062542 Jun 2010 WO
WO2012101240 Aug 2012 WO
WO2012101243 Aug 2012 WO
WO2012113791 Aug 2012 WO
WO2013144358 Oct 2013 WO
WO2013167734 Nov 2013 WO
WO2014041148 Mar 2014 WO
WO2014041149 Mar 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (151)
Entry
“Inheritance (object-oriented programming)”, archived Wikipedia on Sep. 4, 2011, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inheritance_(object-oriented_programming)&oldid=448382925.
Fausd, Juan, “Website Localization and Multilingual CMS”, Globalization Partners International, Mar. 24, 2011 https://www.globalizationpartners.com/201 Jan. 3, 24/website-localization-and-multilingual-cms/ (Year: 2011).
Pendo, Joshua, “Best way to translate database driven content”, Stack Overflow, Mar. 14, 2012, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9705287/best-way-to-translate-database-driven-content (Year: 2012).
“The GNU Make Manual”, Version 3.79, edition 0.55, Apr. 2000, Free Software Foundation, Inc, 137 pages.
Rational Software Corporation, “Introduction to ClearCase”, Dec. 1999, Rational ClearCase, Release 4.0. 78 pages.
Rational Software Corporation, “Administering ClearCase”, Rational ClearCase Release 4.0, 1999, 419 pages.
Challenger et al., “A Scalable System for Consistently Caching Dynamic Web Data”, INFOCOM '99. Eighteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computerand Communications Societies. Proceedings. IEEE, Mar. 21-25, 1999, pp. 294-303, vol. 1, 10 pages.
Challenger et al., “A Publishing System for Efficiently Creating Dynamic Web Content”, INFOCOM 2000. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computerand Communications Societies. Proceedings. IEEE, Mar. 26-30, 2000, vol. 2. 10 pages.
Croll et al., “Content Management—The Users Requirements”, International Broadcasting Convention, Conference Publication No. 447, Sep. 12-16, 1997, 4 pages.
IDIOM, Inc. “WorldServer 2 White Paper”, 2000, 19 pages.
Market Wire. “VerticalNet Selects Uniscape as Globalization Provider to Speed Global Expansion”, Jun. 2000, <www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_pwwi/is_200006/ai_mark01011558/print> accessed on Oct. 1, 2005, 2 pages.
PRNewsWire and News desk. “Personify Selects Uniscape to Enable Ebusiness Solutions for Global Markets”, Aug. 30, 2000, <www.findwealth.com/personify-selects-uniscape-to-enable-180593pr.html> accessed on Oct. 1, 2005, 2 pages.
Uniscape, Inc. “Uniscape, Inc. Home Page”, publicly posted Feb. 20, 1999, <web.archive.org/web/19990220195249//http://www.uniscape-inc.com/> accessed on Oct. 1, 2005, 2 pages.
Business Wire. “Uniscape Introduces Pilot Program to Provide Multilingual Website Management Solutions,” Feb. 11, 1999, <www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1999_Feb_11/11/ai_53852378> accessed on May 9, 2011, 1 page.
Business Wire. “Uniscape Announces New Solution for Automating Management of Software Localization Process,” Aug. 17, 1998, <www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1998_August_17/ai_21090247> accessed on Sep. 30, 2005, 2 pages.
Market Wire. “Cephren Relies on Uniscape During Rapid Global eBusiness Expansion,” Oct. 18, 2000, <www.marketwire.com/mw/iwpr?id=18115&cat=te> accessed on Oct. 1, 2005, 2 pages.
My Yahoo—RSS Headlines Module—Frequently Asked Questions. XP002508567. Dec. 17, 2008.
Unidex, Inc.: “XML Convert,” Aug. 4, 2007, <http://www.unidex.com/xflat.htm> accessed on Apr. 5, 2012, 1 page.
Wikipedia—“SOAP,” Jan. 22, 2011, <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SOAP&oldid=409349976> accessed on Apr. 4, 2012, 5 pages.
Mutz et al., “User-Agent Display Attributes,” HTTP Working Group, Nov. 26, 1996, 6 pages.
XP007905525, The Technical Aspects Identified in the Present Application (Art. 15 PCT) are considered part of common general knowledge. Due to their notoriety no documentary evidence is found to be required. Official Journal Nov. 2007, p. 592.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 26, 2012 in application No. PCT/EP2012/051284, filed Jan. 27, 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 15, 2012 in application No. PCT/EP2012/052934, filed Feb. 21, 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 2, 2012 in application No. PCT/EP2012/051291, filed Jan. 27, 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 23, 2013 in Patent Cooperation Treaty application No. PCT/EP2013/056842, filed Mar. 29, 2013 pp. 1, 3-6, 8-10.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 8, 2014 in Patent Cooperation Treaty application No. PCT/EP2013/069078, filed Sep. 14, 2013 pp. 1, 3-7.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 8, 2014 in Patent Cooperation Treaty application No. PCT/EP2013/069077, filed Sep. 14, 2013 pp. 1, 3, 4, 6-8.
Colligan et al.; Special Edition Using Microsoft Office Frontpage 2003; 2004; Que Publishing; pp. 50-91 and 323-326.
“Highlight;” Microsoft Computer Dictionary; May 1, 2002; Microsoft Press; p. 320.
First Examination Report dated Jun. 17, 2014 in European Patent Convention application No. 12707723.8, filed Feb. 21, 2012, pp. 1, 3-6.
Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Feb. 11, 2015 in European Patent Convention application No. 1270772.8, filed Feb. 21, 2012.
Final Office Action, dated Sep. 23, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,989, filed Jan. 29, 2011.
Non-Final Office Action, dated Jun. 8, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/436,656, filed Mar. 30, 2012.
Advisory Action, dated Jun. 29, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/609,293, filed Sep. 11, 2012.
Non-Final Office Action, dated Sep. 29, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,384, filed Sep. 10, 2013.
Non-Final Office Action, dated Oct. 30, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/091,329, filed Nov. 26, 2013.
Result of Consultation dated May 28, 2015 in European Patent Convention application No. 12707723.8, filed Feb. 21, 2012.
Decision to Refuse dated Jun. 29, 2015 in European Patent Application 12707723.8 filed Feb. 21, 2012.
Minutes of Oral Proceeding dated Jun. 29, 2015 in European Patent Application 12707723.8 filed Feb. 21, 2012.
Non-Final Office Action, dated Sep. 28, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,989, filed Jan. 29, 2011.
Final Office Action, dated Oct. 6, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 13/035,852, filed Feb. 25, 2011.
Advisory Action, dated Nov. 29, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 13/035,852, filed Feb. 25, 2011.
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 24, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,988, filed Jan. 29, 2011.
Non-Final Office Action, dated Nov. 28, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 13/891,029, filed May 9, 2013.
Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 7, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 13/609,293, filed Sep. 11, 2012.
Final Office Action, dated Jul. 12, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 13/886,194, filed May 2, 2013.
Final Office Action, dated Oct. 31, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 13/886,194, filed May 2, 2013.
Non-Final Office Action, dated Nov. 28, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,384, dated Sep. 10, 2013.
Advisory Action, dated Sep. 8, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/091,329, filed Nov. 26, 2013.
Non-Final Office Action, dated Jul. 14, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,015, filed Nov. 28, 2013.
Final Office Action, dated Nov. 3, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,015, filed Nov. 28, 2013.
Advisory Action, dated Jan. 13, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,015, filed Nov. 28, 2013.
Non-Final Office Action, dated Jan. 18, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 14/091,329, filed Nov. 26, 2013.
Final Office Action, dated Jan. 24, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 13/886,194, filed May 2, 2013.
Advisory Action, dated Feb. 9, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 14/093,015, filed Nov. 28, 2013.
“Krishnan, ““Unmittelbare Ergenbnisse Noch Schneller: Google Vorschau—Der Google Produkt-Kompass,”” Nov. 9, 2010, <http://web.archive.org/web/20101109154340/http://google-produkt-kompass.blogspot.com/2010/11/unmittelbare-ergebnisse-nochschneller.html> accessed on Apr. 4, 2012, 2 pages.”
Nepveu et al. “Adaptive Language and Translation Models for Interactive Machine Translation” Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Jul. 25, 2004, 8 pages. Retrieved from: http://www.cs.jhu.edu/˜yarowsky/sigdat.html.
Ortiz-Martinez et al. “Online Learning for Interactive Statistical Machine Translation” Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL, Jun. 10, 2010, pp. 546-554. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220817231_Online_Learning_for_Interactive_Statistical_Machine_Translation.
Callison-Burch et al. “Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation” [W12-3100] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 10-51. Retrieved from http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation.
Lopez, Adam. “Putting Human Assessments of Machine Translation Systems in Order” [W12-3101] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 1-9. Retrieved from http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation.
Avramidis, Eleftherios. “Quality estimation for Machine Translation output using linguistic analysis and decoding features” [W12-3108] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 84-90. Retrieved from http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation.
Buck, Christian. “Black Box Features for the WMT 2012 Quality Estimation Shared Task” [W12-3109] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 91-95. Retrieved from Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation. Retrieved from http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation.
Felice et al. “Linguistic Features for Quality Estimation” [W12-3110] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 96-103. Retrieved at http://aclanthology info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation.
Gonzalfz-Rubio et al. “PRHLT Submission to the WMT12 Quality Estimation Task” [W12-3111] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 104-108. Retrieved from http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation.
Hardmeier et al. “Tree Kernels for Machine Translation Quality Estimation” [W12-3112] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation,Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 109-113. Retrieved from http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation.
Langlois et al. “LORIA System for the WMT12 Quality Estimation Shared Task” [W12-3113] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 114-119. Retrieved from http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation.
Moreau et al. “Quality Estimation: an experimental study using unsupervised similarity measures” [W12-3114] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 120-126. Retrieved from http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation.
Gonzalez et al. “The UPC Submission to the WMT 2012 Shared Task on Quality Estimation” [W12-3115] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 127-132. Retrieved from http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation.
Popovic, Maja. “Morpheme- and POS-based IBM1 and language model scores for tanslation quality estimation” Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 133-137. Retrieved from http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation.
Rubino et al. “DCU-Symantec Submission for the WMT 2012 Quality Estimation Task” [W12-3117] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 138-144. Retrieved from http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation.
Soricut et al. “The SDL Language Weaver Systems in the WMT12 Quality Estimation Shared Task” [W12-3118] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 145-151. Retrieved from http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation.
Wu et al. “Regression with Phrase Indicators for Estimating MT Quality” [W12-3119] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 152-156. Retrieved from http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation.
Wuebker et al. “Hierarchical Incremental Adaptation for Statistical Machine Translation” Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1059-1065, Lisbon, Portugal, Sep. 17-21, 2015.
“Best Practices—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Mar. 6, 2017 [retrieved on Oct. 19, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/translators/best-practices>, 2 pages.
“Data Security—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Oct. 14, 2016 [retrieved on Oct. 19, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/security>, 1 pages.
“Data Security and Confidentiality,” Lilt website [online], 2017 [retrieved on Oct. 19, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet: <https://lilt.com/security>, 7 pages.
“Memories—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Jun. 7, 2017 [retrieved on Oct. 19, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/project-managers/memory>, 4 pages.
“Memories (API)—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Jun. 2, 2017 [retrieved on Oct. 19, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/api/memories>, 1 page.
“Quoting—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Jun. 7, 2017 [retrieved on Oct. 19, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet: <https://lilt.com/kb/project-managers/quoting>, 4 pages.
“The Editor—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Aug. 15, 2017 [retrieved on Oct. 19, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/translators/editor>, 5 pages.
“Training Lilt—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Oct. 14, 2016 [retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/troubleshooting/training-lilt>, 1 page.
“What is Lilt_—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online],Dec. 15, 2016 [retrieved on Oct. 19, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/what-is-lilt>, 1 page.
“Getting Started—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Apr. 11, 2017 [retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/translators/getting-started>, 2 pages.
“The Lexicon—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Jun. 7, 2017 [retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/translators/lexicon>, 4 pages.
“Simple Translation—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Aug. 17, 2017 [retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/api/simple-translation>, 3 pages.
“Split and Merge—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Oct. 14, 2016 [retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/translators/split-merge>, 4 pages.
“Lilt API_API Reference,” Lilt website [online], retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017, Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/docs/api>, 53 pages.
“Automatic Translation Quality—Knowledge Base”, Lilt website [online], Dec. 1, 2016, retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017, Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/evaluation/evaluate-mt>, 4 pages.
“Projects—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Jun. 7, 2017, retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017, Retrieved from the Internet: <https://lilt.com/kb/project-managers/projects>, 3 pages.
“Getting Started with lilt,” Lilt website [online], May 30, 2017, retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017, Retrieved from the Internet: <https://lilt.com/kb/api/lilt-js>, 6 pages.
“Interactive Translation—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Aug. 17, 2017, retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017, Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/api/interactive-translation>, 2 pages.
Hilderbrand et al., “Adaptation of the Translation Model for Statistical Machine Translation based on Information Retrieval,” EAMT 2005 Conference Proceedings, May 2005, pp. 133-142. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228634956_Adaptation_of_the_translation_model_for_statistical_machine_translation_based_on_information_retrieval.
Och et al., “The Alignment Template Approach to Statistical Machine Translation Machine Translation,” Computational Linguistics, vol. 30, No. 4, Dec. 1, 2004, pp. 417-442 (39 pages with citations). Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1105589.
Sethy et al., “Building Topic Specific Language Models FromWebdata Using Competitive Models,” Interspeech 2005—Eurospeech, 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Lisbon, Portugal, Sep. 4-8, 2005, 4 pages. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221490916_Building_topic_specific_language_models_from_webdata_using_competitive_models.
Dobrinkat, “Domain Adaptation in Statistical Machine Translation Systems via User Feedback,” Master's Thesis, University of Helsinki, Nov. 25, 2008, 103 pages. Retrieved from http://users.ics.aalto.fi/mdobrink/online-papers/dobrinkat08mt.pdf.
Business Wire, “Language Weaver Introduces User-Managed Customization Tool,” Oct. 25, 2005, 3 pages. Retrieved from http: ProQuest.
Winiwarter, W., “Learning Transfer Rules for Machine Translation from Parallel Corpora,” Journal of Digital Information Management, vol. 6 No. 4, Aug. 2008, pp. 285-293. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/220608987_Learning_Transfer_Rules_for_Machine_Translation_from_Parallel_Corpora.
Potet et al., “Preliminary Experiments on Using Users' Post-Editions to Enhance a SMT System,” Proceedings of the European Association for Machine Translation (EAMT), May 2011, pp. 161-168. Retrieved from Retrieved at http://www.mt-archive.info/EAMT-2011-Potet.pdf.
Ortiz-Martinez et al., “An Interactive Machine Translation System with Online Learning” Proceedings of the ACL-HLT 2011 System Demonstrations, Jun. 21, 2011, pp. 68-73. Retrieved from http://www.actweb.org/anthology/P11-4012.
Lopez-Salcedo et al.,“Online Learning of Log-Linear Weights in Interactive Machine Translation,” Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 328, 2011, pp. 1-10. Retrieved from http://www.casmacat.eu/uploads/Main/iberspeech2.pdf.
Blanchon et al., “A Web Service Enabling Gradable Post-edition of Pre-translations Pro duced by Existing Translation Tools: Practical Use to Provide High quality Translation of an Online Encyclopedia” Jan. 2009, 9 pages. Retrieved from http://www.mt-archive.info/MTS-2009-Blanchon.pdf.
Levenberg et al.“Stream-based Translation Models for Statistical Machine Translation” Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL, Dec. 31, 2010, pp. 394-402.
Lagarda et al. “Statistical Post-Editing of a Rule Based Machine Translation System” Proceedings of NAACL HLT 2009: Short Papers, Jun. 2009, pp. 217-220.
Ehara, “Rule Based Machine Translation Combined with Statistical Post Editor for Japanese to English Patent Translation,” MT Summit XI, 2007, pp. 13-18.
Bechara et al. “Statistical Post-Editing for a Statistical MT System” Proceedings of the 13th Machine Translation Summit, 2011, pp. 308-315.
Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings, European Patent Application No. 12703483.3, dated Nov. 30, 2017, 11 pages.
“Web analytics,” Wikipedia [online], Jan. 27, 2001 [retrieved on Sep. 11, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Web_analytics&oldid=410384013>, 11 pages.
“Examining Division Preliminary Opinion,” European Patent Application No. 12703483.3, dated Apr. 30, 2018, 9 pages.
“Decision to Refuse,” European Patent Application No. 12703483.3, dated Jun. 19, 2018, 24 pages.
“Minutes of Oral Proceeding”, European Patent Application No. 12703483.3, dated Jun. 19, 2018, 4 pages.
“Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings,” European Patent Application No. 12703482.5, dated Feb. 14, 2018, 10 pages.
“Office Action,” European Patent Application No. 13776975.8, dated Jun. 4, 2018, 11 pages.
“Decision to Refuse,” European Patent Application No. 12703482.5, dated Sep. 17, 2018, 4 pages.
Leblond, Dominique, “Blueprinting of Multimedia Assets”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/619,591, filed Sep. 14, 2012, 40 pages.
“Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings,” European Patent Application No. 13776975.8, dated Jul. 2, 2019, 18 pages.
Wikipedia: “XML” [online], [retreived on Mar. 2, 2020], Retreived from the Internet: <https://www.wikipedia.com/XML>, 2 pages.
“Notice of Allowance,” European Patent Application No. 13776975.8, dated Feb. 12, 2020, 7 pages.
Eckerson, Wayne, “Performance Management Strategies: How to Create and Deploy Effective Metrics,” TDWI Best Practices Report, First Quarter (2009), 35 pages.
Padmanabhan et al., “Using Predictive Prefetching to Improve World Wide Web Latency,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 26.3, 1996, pp. 22-36.
Hasegawa et al., “Multilingual Disaster Information System: Information Delivery Using Graphic Text for Mobile Phones,” AI & Soc 19, 2005, pp. 265-278.
“Serialization (C#)”, Microsoft, <https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/mt656716.aspx>, Jan. 2, 2020, 4 pages.
“What are object serialization and deserialization?” Stack Overflow, <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1360632/object-serialization-anddeserialization>, Sep. 1, 2009, 6 pages.
“Java Serialization and Deserialization”, Studytonight, <http://www.studytonight.com/java/serialization-and-deserialization.php>, 2020, Accessed Oct. 23, 2020, 7 pages.
Upadhyay, Chirantan, “Serialization and Deserialization in ASP.NET with C#”, Code Project, <https://www.codeproject.com/kb/cs/seranddeserialization.aspx>, May 27, 2009, 7 pages.
“Serialize”, PHP, <http://php.net/manual/en/function.serialize.php>, accessed Oct. 23, 2020, 28 pages.
“Interface Serializable”, Oracle, <http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/io/Serializable.html>, accessed Oct. 23, 2020, 3 pages.
Sakai, Marie et al., “Building DITA-based CMS as integrated documentation environment”, The 6th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems, and The 13th International Symposiurn on Advanced Intelligence Systems, IEEE, 2012, 5 pages.
“Oracle ATG Platform Programming Guide”; Oracle Corporation; retrieved on Jan. 19, 2021 from <URL:https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E35319_01/Platform.10-2/ATGPlatformProgGuide/html/s0101introduction01.html>, 2013, 2 pages.
Christensson, Per. “HTML Definition.” TechTerms. Sharpened Productions, <URL:https://techterms.com/definition/html>, May 23, 2015, 2 pages.
Adomavicius et al., “Context-Aware Recommender Systems”, AI Magazine, 2011, 14 pages.
Final Office Action, dated Apr. 20, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,989, filed Jan. 29, 2011.
Advisory Action, dated Apr. 28, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 13/886,194, filed May 2, 2013.
Notice of Allowance, dated May 9, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 13/891,029, filed May 9, 2013.
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 14, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,384, dated Sep. 10, 2013.
Non-Final Office Action, dated Jun. 15, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 13/035,852, filed Feb. 25, 2011.
Advisory Action, dated Jun. 23, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 13/886,194, filed May 2, 2013.
Non-Final Office Action, dated Jul. 11, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 15/423,305, filed Feb. 2, 2017.
Schafer, Ben J. et al., “Recommender Systems in E-Commerce,” Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on Electronic Commerce (EC '99), ACM, New York, NY, 1999, pp. 158-166.
Notice of Allowance dated May 24, 2016 in Japanese Patent Application 2013-550888 filed Jan. 27, 2012, pp. 1-3.
Notice of Allowance dated May 24, 2016 in Japanese Patent Application 2013-554869 filed Feb. 21, 2012, pp. 1-3.
Preview; Feb. 26, 2011; Dictionary.com; pp. 1-2.
Edgar; “Why Do Browsers Display My Site Differently?” Jun. 3, 2009 (updated Nov. 2010); matthewedgar.net; pp. 1-5.
Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2016 in Japanese Patent Application 2013-550887 filed Jul. 26, 2013.
Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2015 in Japanese Patent Application 2013-550888 filed Jan. 27, 2012.
Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2016 in Japanese Patent Application 2013-554869 filed Feb. 21, 2012.
Wikipedia; “Serialization”; Nov. 14, 2013; 10 pages; https://web.archive.org/web/20131114152415/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serialization.
Microsoft, MSDN; “Serialization .NET Framework 4.5”; Jan. 10, 2013; 2 pages; https://web.archive.org/web/20130110102559/http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/7ay27kt9(v=vs. 110).aspx.
European Patent Application No. 12703483.3, “Office Action,” dated Jan. 25, 2017, 7 pages.
“Notice of Allowance,” Japan Patent Application No. 2013-550887, dated Apr. 11, 2017, 3 pages.
Japan Patent Application No. 2013-550887, “Office Action,” dated Oct. 4, 2016, 4 pages [8 pages including translation].
European Patent Application No. 12703482.5, “Office Action,” dated Sep. 6, 2016, 4 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140081775 A1 Mar 2014 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13619591 Sep 2012 US
Child 13886199 US