Bluetooth technology allows Bluetooth devices to discover one another when they are within range and then to connect to one another. Discovery and subsequent connection to another Bluetooth device occurs through inquiry and page scan operations. The purpose of the inquiry operation is to discover other Bluetooth devices; and, the purpose of the page scan operation is to connect to other Bluetooth devices.
In operation, a first Bluetooth device, termed a “master”, acts as an inquirer by transmitting short packets at a very fast rate. A second device, termed a “slave”, listens for those packets by conducting an inquiry scan at a much slower rate. During this process, channel hopping is employed, as will be appreciated by the skilled artisan, so that eventually the devices will synchronize up with one another.
One of the problems associated with the discovery process is that during the time when the slave device listens for packets in its inquiry scan, the slave device is in a full receive state or mode, meaning that current draw and power consumption are high. This problem can be particularly challenging in the context of battery-powered devices.
This Summary is provided to introduce subject matter that is further described below in the Detailed Description and Drawings. Accordingly, the Summary should not be considered to describe essential features nor used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
In one embodiment, a method comprises initiating a scan mode in a Bluetooth slave device, wherein the scan mode is one other than a full receive mode; receiving a signal from a Bluetooth master device; ascertaining whether a signal energy with respect to said signal meets a defined threshold; and if the signal energy meets the defined threshold, entering the full receive mode.
In another embodiment, a Bluetooth device comprises circuitry configured to: initiate a scan mode, wherein the scan mode is one other than a full receive mode; receive a signal from a Bluetooth master device; ascertain whether a signal energy with respect to said signal meets a defined threshold; and if the signal energy meets the defined threshold, enter the full receive mode.
The same numbers are used throughout the drawings to reference like features.
Overview
In various embodiments, different scan modes are provided for Bluetooth devices. In at least some embodiments, a narrowband scanning mode is employed that looks for signal energy on individual transmission frequencies at a time. By looking for signal energy rather than decoding transmitted packets, at least some of the components in a Bluetooth device can remain in an idle or rest state. In at least some other embodiments, a midband scanning mode is employed and looks for signal energy across multiple different frequencies at a time. By looking for signal energy across multiple different frequencies rather than decoding transmitted packets, at least some of the components in a Bluetooth device can remain in an idle or rest state. In at least some other embodiments, a wideband scanning mode is employed and looks for signal energies across all relevant frequencies at a time. Further, at least some embodiments enable a Bluetooth device to switch between scanning modes as will become apparent below.
In the discussion that follows, a section entitled “Operating Environment” is provided and describes one example operating environment in which one or more embodiments can be employed. Following this, a section entitled “Narrowband Mode” is provided and describes an embodiment that employs a narrowband scanning mode in a Bluetooth device. Following this, a section entitled “Midband Mode” is provided and describes an embodiment that employs a midband scanning mode. Next, a section entitled “Wideband Mode” is provided and describes an embodiment that employs a wideband scanning mode. Following this section, a section entitled “Switching between Modes” is provided and describes embodiments that enable a Bluetooth device to switch between various scanning modes.
Operating Environment
As will be appreciated by the skilled artisan, the master and slave devices can be embodied as any suitable digital device including, by way of example and not limitation, telephones, laptop computer systems, head sets, printers, personal digital assistants, desktop computer systems, fax machines, keyboards, joy sticks, and virtually any other type of digital device. Typically, such devices include a Bluetooth transceiver to both transmit and receive signals.
In operation, a device discovery process is used by master device 102 to discover one or more slave devices such as slave device 104. Initially, master device 102 sends or broadcasts a general inquiry message or inquiry that can be received by slave device 104. When the master device 102 broadcasts an inquiry, it typically remains in an inquiry state for a predetermined period of time which may be programmable. If a slave device, such as slave device 104, is in a discoverable state, the slave device enters into an inquiry scan during which time it scans for inquiries for a predetermined period of time. The slave device 104 can then send an inquiry response to the master device 102. The inquiry response can provide information such as a Bluetooth device address for the master device 102 to use for connecting to the slave device 104.
To connect to a slave device, a master device then sends a page to the slave device that responded to its inquiry. In response to a page, the slave device sends a page response that provides information that enables the master device to display a user-friendly name for a user to select for connection to the slave device.
In a normal page scan operation, the master device 102 hops frequencies at 3200 hops per second over 32 channels. The master device typically transmits an ID packet having a duration of 68 μs every 312.5 μs. Typically, the 32 channels are split into two trains of 16 sub-channels. The master device steps through a train in 10 ms and then repeats the trains in a certain pattern for a programmable duration such as, for example, 5.12 seconds or 10.24 seconds. The master device operates in a repeated pattern, for example, transmit-transmit-receive-receive pattern until the slave device responds or times out.
The slave device 104 typically opens a scan window having a duration of 11.25 ms every 1.28 seconds, both durations of which are programmable. During this time, the slave device dwells at different channels at every scan window. The slave device responds once an ID packet has been detected and follows using the remaining connection set up protocol. For a 5.12 second master paging duration, there are typically four chances for the slave device to detect the ID packet from the master device.
Antenna 308 transmits and receives radio signals that are processed by RF module 302. The RF module comprises a Bluetooth radio which provides various functionality including, by way of example and not limitation, bridging to data networks and forming picotnets of connected devices. The Bluetooth radio operates in accordance with the Bluetooth standard BT2.1. Link controller 304 is embodied as a hardware digital signal processor for performing, among other processing, various baseband processing operations. Microcontroller 306 provides a separate central processing unit for managing the Bluetooth device and for handling inquiries and requests. The microcontroller can be used to discover and communicate with other Bluetooth devices via a Link Manager Protocol or LMP. The Link Manager Protocol provides services including, by way of example and not limitation, sending and receiving data, inquiring and reporting names or device identifiers, making and responding to link address inquiries, connection set up, authentication, and link mode negotiation and set up.
Having considered an example operating environment and some background principles on Bluetooth operation, consider now a discussion of various power-saving scanning modes in accordance with one or more embodiments.
Narrowband Mode
In one or more embodiments, a narrowband scanning mode is utilized to look for energy on a particular frequency. In at least some embodiments, the narrowband scanning mode does not utilize a full Bluetooth receive state, and hence full current consumption during the scan period. Instead, a sub-state is entered during which time the Bluetooth device does not attempt to decode a packet. Rather, the Bluetooth device looks for energy on a frequency and, responsive to finding energy on a frequency that fits a particular profile, a decision is made that a corresponding signal is a legitimate Bluetooth transmission.
With a scanning device, such as a Bluetooth slave device, one typically wants the device to be discoverable at all times. However, one does not necessarily know that there is another device, such as a master device, attempting to discover the slave device.
In accordance with one or more embodiments, when an energy detection scan is conducted, only the transceiver and a couple other components are in an operational state. This serves to conserve power and hence constitutes an operating efficiency. One of the advantages of using a narrowband scan is that the same system architecture can be used for the transceiver as well as other components on the device. Another of the advantages of using narrowband scanning is that adverse impacts due to interference can be reduced. One trade-off, however, is that compared to other scanning modes described below, there can be a higher current consumption. In some implementations, the current estimation for current consumption in the narrowband embodiment is about 20 milliamps.
In operation, a signal is received by the antenna and down converted by mixing/down converting circuit 402 to a frequency of 2 MHz with a bandwidth of 1 MHz. The energy of the received signal is detected by the peak detectors 410, 412 and analyzed by DSP 416. If a duration threshold that is set for the energy is reached, then the DSP 416 knows that the signal constitutes a Bluetooth package and not some other signal such as WIFI or microwave signal. If such is the case, DSP 416 generates an interrupt signal which is provided to MAC 420 effectively waking the MAC and other components up to operate in a normal receive mode in which packets can be decoded.
In the illustrated and described embodiment, at least some of the components of electrical circuit 400 are not turned on or operational during energy detection operations. These include analog-to-digital converter 414, main DSP 418, and MAC 420. Specifically, these components do not need to be continuously on. Rather, they are on for only a short period of time (such as during packet decoding) and are idle otherwise. Most of the time, this circuit operates in a low power mode, by virtue of a number of the components being idle. Only upon an energy detection meeting a defined threshold is normal operation assumed.
In operation, the peak detectors are implemented as window threshold detection circuits. In the particular design, there are two thresholds—a high threshold associated with one of the peak detectors, and a low threshold associated with the other of the peak detectors. Window peak detection utilizes both the high and low thresholds. The peak detectors also employ a common mode voltage between the high and low thresholds. When a signal is received that crosses the high and low thresholds, the peak detectors are triggered and a peak will be generated. Based on this peak generation detected by DSP 416, the interrupt signal is generated and provided to MAC 420.
Describing this operation from a somewhat higher level, consider the following. The default or normal operation of the scanning or slave device is to typically conduct a page and inquiry operation back-to-back, each of which lasts around 11 ms, with a page and inquiry operation being repeated typically every 1.28 seconds. Normally, the device is not necessarily expecting any data at any particular time, but it is ready for data. Each page and inquiry operation constitutes a scan window and the time associated with a page and inquiry operation scan window is referred to as a scan interval. In the typical Bluetooth device, a full receive mode is entered on a scan window during which time the device looks for a correlation hit which triggers a response. In the full receive mode, all of the components in
For example, every 10 ms the master device repeats 16 channels, which is going to be done 128 times. When an energy detection event occurs on a channel, a full receive mode is conducted to do a full scan. Around 10 ms later, the master device should be on the same channel. As will be appreciated by the skilled artisan, Bluetooth employs 79 channels, but for the inquiry and page operations, it uses a subset of 32 channels. For an inquiry operation, the 32 channels are fixed, but for a page operation, the 32 channels depend on the master device's Bluetooth address. The 32 channels are taken and broken into two trains, each having 16 channels.
In the illustrated and described embodiment, the energy detection operation is specific to each channel. In the narrowband mode, the Bluetooth baseband notifies the Bluetooth analog radio and the DSP 416 on which channel to conduct the narrowband detection operation. If energy is detected on a particular channel, the Bluetooth baseband will initiate a full receive mode on that channel using MAC 420 and the other components that were idle. During every scan interval, the scanning or slave device changes its channel, but it does this very slowly, e.g. every 1.28 seconds. At same time, the master device transmits on these channels very quickly. Thus, the master device repeats transmissions enough that there is a very good chance that the signals or channels will line up on both devices.
Step 500 initiates a narrowband scanning mode. An example of a narrowband scanning mode is provided above. Step 502 receives a signal from a master device. Step 504 ascertains whether the signal energy with respect to the received signal meets a defined threshold. The step is performed in the narrowband scanning mode on a channel by channel basis. If the received signal on a particular channel does not meet the energy threshold, the method returns to 502. If, on the other hand, the received signal on the particular channel does meet the energy threshold, step 506 enters a full receive mode. In the illustrated and described embodiment, when a full receive mode is entered, an interrupt signal is generated to wake up components that were otherwise in an idle state on the slave device. In the example above, components that are awakened include, by way of example and not limitation, MAC 420, main DSP 418, and analog-to-digital converter 414 (
Midband Mode
In one or more embodiments, a midband scanning mode can be employed to listen to multiple channels at a time rather than to a single channel at a time, as in the narrowband mode. Any suitable number of channels can be used in the midband scanning mode. In the example below, five channels are used at a time. It is to be appreciated and understood that any number of multiple channels can be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter.
As an example, consider the following in connection with
Step 700 initiates a midband scanning mode. An example of a midband scanning mode is provided above. Step 702 receives a signal from a master device. Step 704 ascertains whether a signal energy for multiple channels with respect to the received signal meets a defined threshold. The step is performed in the midband scanning mode on a multiple channel by multiple channel basis. As noted above, any suitable number of multiple channels can be used. If the received signal on a collection of channels does not meet the energy threshold, the method returns to 702. If, on the other hand, the received signal on the multiple channels does meet the energy threshold, step 706 enters a full receive mode. In the illustrated and described embodiment, when a full receive mode is entered, an interrupt signal is generated to wake up components that were otherwise in an idle state on the slave device. In the example above, components that are awakened include, by way of example and not limitation, MAC 420, main DSP 418, and analog-to-digital converter 414 (
Wideband Mode
In one or more embodiments, a wideband scanning mode can be employed to listen to all of the channels simultaneously rather than to individual channels or a sub-set of channels, as in the narrowband and midband scanning modes respectively.
One of the challenges of using the wideband scanning mode stems from noise that might be present within the range of channels which cannot be differentiated in terms of the channel or channels on which the noise occurs. An advantage of the wideband scanning mode, however, is that the pattern created by an inquiring or paging device (i.e. master device) is very distinct and very repetitive and is going to repeat multiple times in the period of one of the scan windows. So, in this case, the slave device looks for energy with a pattern that is distinct rather than a spike, as in the narrowband scanning mode.
As an example, consider
In the illustrated and described embodiment, the slave device employs a filter that looks for this particular pattern and it provides a baseband indication of how closely a match the energy of the received transmission is to this pattern. When a match occurs, a full scan is triggered and the slave device enters a full receive mode, as in the above example.
One advantage of this approach is that because the pattern is repeating, it is unique. Specifically, in at least some embodiments, the transmission pattern can be characterized by a profile that is a regular and recognizable profile. For example, each transmission, e.g. T1 and T2, lasts for 68 μs and there is a separation of 312.5 μs. Accordingly, the slave device looks for this pattern, as indicated at 802. Accordingly, the slave device attempts to detect energy that fits this pattern in terms of a qualified width of the energy (e.g., 68 μs) with a separation of 312.5 us between energy detections, over a period of time that includes multiple transmissions on the same frequency.
Thus, in this example, if the slave device looks at a window of 1250 μs, the above pattern is going to repeat over and over. If the slave device is in a clean environment, which is to say an environment that is free from noise, the slave device should detect the precisely-transmitted waveform in terms of its energy. If, however, there is some noise in the environment such as that caused by other devices, the slave device will see this noise as indicated by the dashed lines in 802. In operation, data transmission information is collected over a programmable period time, such as either during a full frame or a portion of a frame, such as half of a frame. Over time, during the master device's multiple transmissions, the slave device can build a histogram such as that shown at 804. For example, in at least some embodiments, to construct a histogram over the 1250 μs, multiple samples are taken every 32 μs. Each sample is stored into a memory element or accumulator. For the next 1250 μs, samples are taken and stored back into the accumulator to correspond to the previous samples at locations in the previous 1250 μs window.
The illustrated histogram constitutes a clean histogram in a clean environment. However, if there is interference or noise, the histogram may contain noise data, such as that shown by the dashed line labeled “Noise”. In one or more embodiments, to deal with the noise issue, different thresholds can be programmed and set to look for energy peaks in the histogram, the width of the peaks and the distance between the peaks, such as 68 μs and 312.5 μs, respectively. For example, a first threshold such as Threshold 1 can be set to look for energy peaks, and a second threshold such as Threshold 2 can be set to recognize noise. Based on this programmability in terms of threshold setting, if there is a close match of the pattern that is being looked for, the slave device can conclude that this is a desirable pattern that corresponds to a master device making an inquiry. From this information, the slave device can generate an interrupt signal to the overall system which wakes up idling components. Responsively, the slave device can then decode the next transmitted packet and ascertain whether a response is to be sent to the master device. In at least some embodiments, if there is some noise in the histogram, then the slave device may enter a different scanning mode, such as the narrowband or midband scanning modes to deal more appropriately with the noise, as described below.
Programmability provides an opportunity to look at a programmable number of iterations. Accordingly, the slave device can look for patterns that are repeated a number of times and make a decision to generate an interrupt signal based on a recognized pattern. Alternately or additionally, if the slave device is a clean environment, the scan window can be shrunk and then any indication of energy can be used to go into a regular scan or receive mode. This provides the ability for aggressive power management in clean environments. That is, as the slave device encounters a noisy environment, through programmability, the length of the scan window can be increased as well as the pattern requirements adapted to suit the environment.
Step 1000 initiates a wideband scanning mode. An example of a wideband scanning mode is provided above. Step 1002 receives a signal from a master device. Step 1004 ascertains whether an energy pattern for multiple channels with respect to the received signal is detected. The step can be performed by building a histogram over the received transmissions and then ascertaining from the histogram whether the energy pattern is detected. As noted above, one or more thresholds can be set to look for not only the desired energy pattern, but for noise as well. If the energy pattern is not detected, the method returns to 1002. If, on the other hand, the energy pattern is detected, step 1006 enters a full receive mode. In the illustrated and described embodiment, when a full receive mode is entered, an interrupt signal is generated to wake up components that were otherwise in an idle state on the slave device. In the example above, components that are awakened include, by way of example and not limitation, MAC 420, main DSP 418, and analog-to-digital converter 414 (
Switching Between Modes
As noted above, in at least some embodiments, the slave device is configured to switch between different scanning modes.
In one or more embodiments, the slave device initiates operation in its lowest power mode—here, the wideband scanning mode. The slave device performs wideband detection at pre-determined intervals which can be sustained for an indefinite period of time. Eventually, another device may be within the slave device's reception area and begin transmissions at which time the slave device will see some type of energy detection. When this happens, in at least some embodiments, the slave device may wish to enter into another scanning mode to ascertain whether the transmissions are from another Bluetooth device or whether the transmission constitute some type of noise.
In the simplest case, the slave device can enter, from the wideband scanning mode, a regular scanning mode. Thus, when an energy pattern is detected, a programmable period of regular scanning can be started. For example, the slave device might perform four regular scans as four scans correspond to the typical length of an inquiry or a page from the master device. During a regular scan, the MAC or Bluetooth baseband will wake up and perform a scan during the programmable period. When this is completed, the slave device will have either found a desirable signal or not. If it does not find a desirable signal, these components can go idle and the wideband mode can be entered. In addition, a false detection can be noted and stored. Specifically, in some embodiments, a counter can keep track of the number of false detections. If the false detections reach a particular threshold, the system can fall back into a different mode, such as narrowband scanning mode, in which the slave device attempts to qualify whether a transmission is really a Bluetooth device by narrowing down onto one or more channels. If there is an energy detection in this mode, the slave device can enter into a regular scan mode. If, in the regular scan mode, nothing is detected, a false detection can be noted.
In one or more embodiments, in order to conserve power, one goal is to remain in the wideband scanning mode as long as possible. When an energy detection occurs, the slave device falls back into a different scanning mode, such as a narrowband, midband or regular scanning mode to attempt to scope down on the signal for a set period of time. This can be advantageous for the following reason. Assume that the slave device is in a noisy environment where the wideband mode would be triggering regularly. In a worst case scenario, the slave device would switch into a regular scanning mode, although other modes are possible.
In at least some embodiments, however, the slave device can keep track the type of energy detection that occurs. For example, if the energy detection is a strong detection, then the slave device might switch into a regular scanning mode. If, on the other hand, the energy detection is a weak detection, the slave device might switch into the narrowband or midband modes.
Step 1100 enters a first scanning mode. Any suitable scanning mode can be entered. For example, in the illustration above, the first scanning mode constitutes a wideband scanning mode. An example of a wideband scanning mode is provided above. Step 1102 receives a signal from a master device. Step 1104 ascertains whether an energy profile is detected. The energy profile can be a profile associated with one or multiple channels. For example, an energy profile can be associated with a single channel (as in the narrowband scanning mode) or multiple channels (as in the midband or wideband scanning modes).
If the energy profile is not detected, the method returns to 1102. If, on the other hand, the energy profile is detected, step 1106 enters a different scanning mode. For example, if the first scanning mode is a wideband scanning mode, the different scanning mode can be one or more of a narrowband, midband or regular scanning mode.
In various embodiments, different scan modes are provided for Bluetooth devices. In at least some embodiments, a narrowband scanning mode is employed that looks for signal energy on individual transmission frequencies at a time. By looking for signal energy rather than decoding transmitted packets, at least some of the components in a Bluetooth device can remain in an idle or rest state. In at least some other embodiments, a midband scanning mode is employed and looks for signal energy across multiple different frequencies at a time. Again, by looking for signal energy across multiple different frequencies rather than decoding transmitted packets, at least some of the components in a Bluetooth device can remain in an idle or rest state. In at least some other embodiments, a wideband scanning mode is employed and looks for signal energies across all relevant frequencies at a time. Further, at least some embodiments enable a Bluetooth device to switch between scanning modes.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 12/190,240, filed on Aug. 12, 2008 which in turn claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/955,497, filed on Aug. 13, 2007, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4337463 | Vangen | Jun 1982 | A |
4805215 | Miller | Feb 1989 | A |
5347234 | Gersbach et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5634207 | Yamaji et al. | May 1997 | A |
5673291 | Dent | Sep 1997 | A |
5708656 | Noneman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5847616 | Ng et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5995819 | Yamaji et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6167245 | Welland et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6285262 | Kuriyama | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6320919 | Khayrallah et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6347091 | Wallentin et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6366622 | Brown et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374117 | Denkert et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6438364 | Waite | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452458 | Tanimoto | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6509777 | Razavi et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6519461 | Andersson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535037 | Maligeorgos | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6553229 | Dent | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6640308 | Keyghobad et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6650195 | Brunn et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6675328 | Krishnamachari et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6741846 | Welland et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6754189 | Cloutier et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6816452 | Maehata | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6816718 | Yan et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6934566 | Kang et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6946950 | Ueno et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6954708 | Rakshani et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7079811 | Lee et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7139540 | Wu et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7173431 | Lo et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7206840 | Choi et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7212798 | Adams et a | May 2007 | B1 |
7239882 | Cook | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7257095 | Liu | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7286009 | Andersen et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7298183 | Mirzaei et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7310023 | Cha et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7319849 | Womac | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7342895 | Serpa et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7355416 | Darshan | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7377441 | Wiklof et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7395040 | Behzad | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7403018 | Lo et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7564826 | Sherman et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7595768 | Li et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7599671 | Kopikare et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7616935 | Fernandez-Corbaton et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7626966 | Ruiter et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7656205 | Chen et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7659003 | Aoki et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672645 | Kilpatrick et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7689190 | Kerth et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7711004 | Xu | May 2010 | B2 |
7826411 | Gonikberg et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7849333 | Schindler | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7876786 | Bahl et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7881746 | Desai | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7936714 | Karr et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7957340 | Choi et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7966036 | Kojima | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7995544 | Benveniste | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000715 | Melpignano et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8014329 | Gong | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8060017 | Schlicht et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8072913 | Desai | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8077652 | William | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8078111 | Jovicic et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8081038 | Lee et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8107391 | Wu et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8139670 | Son et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8149715 | Goel | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8150328 | Chaudhri et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8170002 | Wentink | May 2012 | B2 |
8170546 | Bennett | May 2012 | B2 |
8189506 | Kneckt et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8204015 | Chaudhri et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8229087 | Sumioka et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8254296 | Lambert | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8274894 | Kneckt et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8275314 | Lin et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8310967 | Goel | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8315564 | Banerjea | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8340034 | Lee | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8364188 | Srinivasan et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8369782 | Lin et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8472427 | Wheeler et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8472968 | Kim | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8532041 | Lambert et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8553561 | Chokshi et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8571479 | Banerjea | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8577305 | Rossi et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8588705 | Tsui et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8600324 | Cousinard et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
20020025810 | Takayama et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020049854 | Cox et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030040316 | Stanforth et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030148750 | Yan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030198200 | Diener et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040063403 | Durrant | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040105401 | Lee | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040110470 | Tsiden et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040162106 | Monroe et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040192222 | Vaisanen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040198297 | Oh et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040214575 | Jovanovic | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040233881 | Kang et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050018641 | Zhao et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050025104 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050025174 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050058151 | Yeh | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050064840 | Heydari et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050090218 | Ishida et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050120119 | Bhanu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135360 | Shin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050174962 | Gurevich | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186962 | Yoneyama et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050206554 | Yamaura | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050250528 | Song et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050254423 | Berghoff | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050281278 | Black et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060007863 | Naghian | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060049880 | Rein et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063509 | Pincu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060079232 | Omori et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060114044 | Mintchev et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060120338 | Hwang et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060128308 | Michael et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060128347 | Piriyapoksombut et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060189359 | Kammer et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060199565 | Ammirata | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060200862 | Olson et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215601 | Vleugels et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060223474 | Yoshizaki et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239443 | Oxford et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060251198 | Ma et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060252418 | Quinn et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060264179 | Bonneville et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060268756 | Wang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060268804 | Kim et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060281404 | Lee et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282541 | Hiroki | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282667 | Kim et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286935 | Utsunomiya et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070010237 | Jones et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010247 | Mouna-Kingue et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070014314 | O'Neil | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070077908 | Vorenkamp et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070081553 | Cicchetti et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070103829 | Darshan et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109973 | Trachewsky | May 2007 | A1 |
20070142080 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070173286 | Carter et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070178888 | Alfano et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070183443 | Won | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070200622 | Filoramo et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202814 | Ono et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206519 | Hansen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070206762 | Chandra et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070223430 | Desai et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070238482 | Rayzman et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242645 | Stephenson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070264959 | Carrez | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268862 | Singh et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280471 | Fallahi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070286298 | Choi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297388 | Appaji et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080027033 | Gonda et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080045162 | Rofougaran et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080056201 | Bennett | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080069034 | Buddhikot et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080076466 | Larsson | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080080446 | Chung | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080095058 | Dalmases et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080095059 | Chu | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080111639 | Ryckaert et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080129118 | Diab | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080130595 | Abdel-Kader | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080137580 | Axelsson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080139212 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161031 | Tu | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080170550 | Liu et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181154 | Sherman | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187003 | Becker | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080232287 | Shao et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080259846 | Gonikberg et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080261552 | Chung | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080261640 | Yoshida | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262991 | Kapoor et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272818 | Ko | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080279163 | Desai | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080310067 | Diab et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320108 | Murty et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005061 | Ward et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090010210 | Hiertz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090137206 | Sherman et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090143043 | Yoshizaki et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090168686 | Love et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090168725 | Mishra | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090170497 | Miao et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090175250 | Mathur et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090190541 | Abedi | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090196210 | Desai | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090202013 | Sebastian | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090209288 | Rofougaran | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090239471 | Tran et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245133 | Gupta et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090245279 | Wan et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090247217 | Hsu et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268652 | Kneckt et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090280762 | Park et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090285264 | Aldana et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090291640 | Bhattad et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090311961 | Banerjea | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090312027 | Foschini et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090321056 | Ran et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100009675 | Wijting et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011231 | Banerjea et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100029325 | Wang et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100052796 | Menkhoff | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100061244 | Meier et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069112 | Sun et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100080319 | Blocher et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100082957 | Iwata | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100097952 | McHenry et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103867 | Kishiyama et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100130129 | Chang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138549 | Goel et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100165896 | Gong et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100216497 | Kawasaki | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100238793 | Alfano et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100248734 | Yamakazi et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100283654 | Waheed et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100303026 | Chaudhri et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100316027 | Rick et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100322213 | Liu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110002226 | Bhatti | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110007675 | Chiou et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110009074 | Hsu et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110053522 | Rofougaran et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110097998 | Ko et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110103363 | Bennett | May 2011 | A1 |
20110161697 | Qi et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110164538 | Karr et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110194519 | Habetha | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120025921 | Yang et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120099476 | Mahaffy | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120276938 | Wagholikar et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130045687 | Banerjea | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130045688 | Banerjea | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130057344 | Touzard et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130176903 | Bijwe | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102067689 | May 2011 | CN |
1860827 | Nov 2007 | EP |
2006174162 | Jun 2006 | JP |
200728568 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007028568 | Feb 2007 | JP |
WO-0178252 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-02082751 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO-02091623 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 2006043956 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006090254 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2007008981 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO-2007064822 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO-2008707777 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO-2009101567 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO-2011056878 | May 2011 | WO |
WO-2013104989 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO-2013119810 | Aug 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Foreign Office Action”, Japanese Application No. 2011-513586, Oct. 23, 2012, 7 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,336, Oct. 4, 2012, 13 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/190,251, Oct. 4, 2012, 6 pages. |
“Advisory Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/190,251, (Dec. 7, 2011), 3 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/190,251, (Sep. 13, 2011), 15 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/323,292, (Aug. 24, 2012), 26 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/534,361, (Feb. 29, 2012), 13 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, EP Application No. 09789754.0, (May 17, 2011), 8 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, European Patent Application No. 09789754.0, (Jul. 12, 2012), 4 pages. |
“Information Technology—Telecommunications and Information Exchange between Systems—Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Specific Requirements”, Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, IEEE Standard 802.11h-2003 (Amendment to IEEE Std 802.11-1993),(Oct. 14, 2003), 80 pages. |
“Information Technology—Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between systems—Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Specific Requirements”, IEEE Standard, (Aug. 1, 2005), pp. 1-60. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/190,240, (Jan. 6, 2012), 7 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/190,251, (Mar. 29, 2012), 11 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/190,251, (Mar. 29, 2011), 8 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/323,292, (Dec. 21, 2011), 17 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,446, (Dec. 28, 2011), 17 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/534,361, (Oct. 12, 2011), 11 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/190,240, (May 16, 2012), 4 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,446, (Jun. 14, 2012), 6 pages. |
“Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications”, Information technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems—Local and metropolitan area networks—Specific requirements,—IEEE,(Apr. 2003), pp. 1-69. |
“PCT Search Report”, U.S. Appl. No. PCT/US2009/046289, (Oct. 29, 2009), 13 pages. |
Jung, Eun-Sun et al., “A Power Control MAC Protocol for Ad Hoc Networks”, Wireless Networks; The Journal of Mobile Communication, Computation, and Information, vol. 11, No. 1-2, Kluwer Academic Publishers,(Jan. 1, 2005), pp. 55-66. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,336, Feb. 25, 2013, 11 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, Chinese Application No. 200980122587.0, Feb. 21, 2013, 17 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, European Patent Application No. 09789754.0, Mar. 11, 2013, 4 Pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, Japanese Application No. 2011-513586, Apr. 9, 2013, 4 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,482, Mar. 19, 2013, 19 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,502, Feb. 21, 2013, 6 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,502, Jun. 25, 2013, 11 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/534,361, Feb. 14, 2013, 12 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/323,292, Jun. 28, 2013, 8 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,336, May 3, 2013, 9 pages. |
“Supplemental Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,336, Jun. 5, 2013, 2 pages. |
“Supplemental Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,336, Jun. 18, 2013, 2 pages. |
Jung, et al.,“A Power Control MAC Protocol for Ad Hoc Networks”, Wireless Networks; The Journal of Mobile Communication, Computation and Information, Kluwer Academic Publishers vol. 11, No. 1-2, Jan. 1, 2005, 12 Pages. |
“Foreign Notice of Allowance”, Japanese Application No. 2011-513586, Jul. 16, 2013, 2 pages. |
Qiao, et al.,“Interference Analysis and Transmit Power Control in IEEE 802.11a/h Wireless LANs”, IEEE/ACM Transactions On Networking, IEEE/ACM, New York, NY, US, vol. 15. No. 5, Oct. 1, 2007, 14 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,482, Sep. 3, 2013, 8 pages. |
Tinnirello, et al.,“Revisit of RTS/CTS Exchange in High-Speed IEEE 802.11 Networks”, World of Wireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks. 2005. Wowmom 2005. Sixth IEEE International Symposium on a Taormina-Giardini Naxos, Italy Jun. 13-16, 2005 Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, Jun. 13, 2005, 10 Pages. |
“Search Report”, European Application No. 13169350.9, Aug. 13, 2013, 10 Pages. |
“Supplemental Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,336, Aug. 14, 2013, 2 pages. |
“Supplemental Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/323,292, Oct. 7, 2013, 2 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, Chinese Application No. 200980122587.0, Sep. 10, 2013, 11 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/099,169, Mar. 28, 2013, 12 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/429,090, Oct. 24, 2013, 13 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/479,124, Sep. 27, 2013, 14 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/883,054, Nov. 22, 2013, 18 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/542,845, Oct. 23, 2013, 29 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/249,740, Oct. 16, 2013, 9 pages. |
“Supplemental Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/323,292, Oct. 17, 2013, 2 pages. |
“Supplemental Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,482, Nov. 29, 2013, 2 pages. |
“Supplemental Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/358,955, Oct. 11, 2013, 3 pages. |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Radio Resource Control (RRC); Protocol Specification (Release 10)”, 3GPP TS 36.331; V10.5.0; 3GPP Organizational Partners, 2012, 302 pages. |
“Advisory Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,721, Aug. 13, 2013, 3 pages. |
ANDREAal.,“Analysis and Design of Injection-Locked LC Dividers for Quadrature Generation”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 39, No. 9, Sep. 2004, pp. 1425-1433. |
“Draft Standard for Information Technology-Telecommunications and information exchange between systems-Local and metropolitan area networks-Specific requirements”, IEEE P802.11s/D1.03, Apr. 2007, 251 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/358,955, Mar. 18, 2013, 12 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,802, Nov. 15, 2012, 15 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,721, Jun. 6, 2013, 16 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/484,563, Apr. 24, 2012, 18 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/616,454, Apr. 11, 2012, 19 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/186,429, Oct. 13, 2011, 23 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/542,845, Sep. 25, 2012, 23 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/358,955, Feb. 17, 2012, 26 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/487,425, May 3, 2012, 9 pages. |
“Further Higher Data Rate Extension in the 2.4 GHz Band”, IEEE P802.11g/D8.2,Draft Supplement to STANDARD [for] Information Technology, Apr. 2003, 69 pages. |
ZYGMUNTal.,“Gossip-Based Ad Hoc Routing”, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 14, No. 3, Jun. 2006, pp. 479-491. |
“IEEE Standard for Information Technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems—Local and metropolitan area networks—Specific requirements Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications Amendment”, IEEE Computer Society, Oct. 14, 2010, pp. 12-18, 23, 65-68. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion”, PCT Application PCT/US2012/035597, Aug. 6, 2012, 13 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/167,841, Jul. 15, 2011, 10 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/484,563, Oct. 4, 2011, 13 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/732,036, Aug. 9, 2012, 13 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,721, Nov. 7, 2012, 15 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,721, May 10, 2012, 15 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/235,333, Jun. 28, 2011, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,802, Mar. 29, 2012, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/186,429, Apr. 25, 2011, 19 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/542,845, Apr. 4, 2012, 19 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/358,955, Sep. 6, 2011, 24 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/358,955, Aug. 20, 2012, 33 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/487,425, Jan. 12, 2012, 7 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/616,454, Dec. 22, 2011, 8 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/249,740, Mar. 26, 2013, 9 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/167,841, Nov. 25, 2011, 11 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/616,454, Aug. 22, 2012, 4 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/235,333, Nov. 15, 2011, 5 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/484,563, Jul. 9, 2012, 6 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/716,569, Apr. 19, 2012, 7 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/732,036, Feb. 21, 2013, 8 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/186,429, Jun. 6, 2013, 9 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/487,425, Jul. 26, 2013, 9 pages. |
“Part 11: Wireless Lan Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications”, IEEE Std 802.11b-1999/Cor 1-2001, Amendment 2: Higher-speed Physical Layer (PHY) extension in the 2.4 GHz band, Nov. 7, 2001, 23 pages. |
“Part 11: Wireless Lan Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications”, IEEE Std 802.11a-1999, High-speed Physical Layer in the 5 GHz Band, 1999, 91 pages. |
“PCT Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2013/025144, Jun. 5, 2013, 10 pages. |
“PCT Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2011/054358, Dec. 16, 2011, 13 pages. |
“PCT Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/IB2013/000390, Aug. 21, 2013, 19 Pages. |
“Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/167,841, May 12, 2011, 6 pages. |
“Supplemental Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/186,429, Jul. 10, 2013, 2 pages. |
“Supplemental Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/716,569, Jul. 23, 2012, 2 pages. |
Syed “TGn Sync Proposal Technical Specification”, IEEE 802.11-04/0889r6, This document presents the technical specification for the MAC and the PHY layer of the TGn Sync proposal to IEEE 802.11 TGn, May 18, 2005, pp. 1-131. |
Syed“TGn Sync Proposal Technical Specification”, IEEE 802.11-04 / Wireless LANs, May 2005, pp. 1-131. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60955497 | Aug 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12190240 | Aug 2008 | US |
Child | 13604563 | US |