The present application claims priority of pending French patent application No. 10 50406 filed on Jan. 21, 2010, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to the field of devices used for sliding on snow, and more specifically boards for use in snowboarding. It is related more specifically to a new board architecture with the geometric characteristics thereof being intended to improve maneuverability and control on compacted snow, while facilitating use on powder snow. In the remainder of the description, the different technical terms defining the geometric parameters of the sliding boards will be defined with reference to ISO standard 6289, or else by a specific definition where appropriate.
Generally speaking, the boards used in snowboarding have seen their geometry evolve so that they can be adapted for use both on piste, i.e. on compacted snow, and on powder snow. A present-day trend thus comprises using snow boards of shorter length to facilitate on-piste maneuvering. Complementarily, to retain sufficient lift, the boards have been modified in order to broaden them in the front (and rear), i.e. beyond the forward (and rear) contact line. The wider transverse lines to the front and rear can thus be placed on some models beyond the forward and rear contact lines.
A description has been given in the document EP-1 935 459 of a snow board which has such a geometry, wherein the running length, defined between the forward and rear contact lines, is shorter than the distance separating the wider lines. This amounts in practice to offsetting the contact lines by a few centimeters behind the wider lines in such a way that the active sidecut when executing a turn exceeds the running length, thereby allowing the board to be maneuvered more easily when it is flat on the snow.
However, these boards do have one drawback in that they remain overall fairly difficult to maneuver on packed snow, since the significant running length thereof opposes swiveling motions when the board is flat, on compacted snow.
A problem that the invention therefore proposes to resolve is that of improving board response by facilitating the maneuverability thereof on the basis of properties defined by the intrinsic geometry of the board. The invention thus relates to a board for snowboarding, which has:
In accordance with the invention, this snowboard is characterized in that, when seen from above, the forward and rear contact lines pass through areas, a forward and a rear area respectively, each delimited by two transverse lines, an inner and an outer line respectively, which are located between the central positions of the binding-mounting areas. To be more specific, the outer transverse line of the forward mounting area is located at a distance of at least 100 mm from the central position of the forward mounting area of the binding, and for the rear mounting area, the outer transverse line is located at a distance of at least 120 mm relative to the central position.
In other words, seen from above, the forward and rear contact lines pass through an area delimited by two transverse lines, forward and rear respectively, located between the central positions of the binding-mounting areas, the forward transverse line being at a distance of at least 100 mm relative to the central position of the forward mounting area of the binding, the rear transverse line being at a distance of at least 120 mm relative to the central position of the rear mounting area of the binding.
Put another way, the board is designed in such a way that the forward and rear contact lines are found substantially between the areas in which the bindings are established. This configuration means that the running length is substantially reduced, which greatly improves board maneuverability, particularly when it is flat on compacted snow. Moreover, the natural camber of the board is modified, namely slightly increased when the user mounts the board. This modification is particularly noteworthy, since it is contrary to what is seen on existing boards, where the space located under the board reduces when the user mounts the board, owing to the fact that the contact lines are located outside, i.e. beyond the positions of the bindings. Conversely therefore, the inventive board sees its camber increase when the board is in use. The presence of the camber allows two distinct grip zones to be maintained. Stability is therefore ensured, despite a large reduction in the running length relative to traditional boards.
In practice, at the level of each binding, the optimum zone for positioning the contact line is between two inner and outer transverse lines, which may be located at distances more or less distant from the central position of the binding-mounting area, as a function of the influence that is required on the camber of the board when in use. This positioning may to advantage differ between the front and the rear, in order to take account of the fact that the setting of the bindings is not symmetrical relative to the middle of the board, and that the bindings may be set back, i.e. moved away relative to the middle of the board. Thus, for the forward binding, the inner transverse line may be located 220 mm, or even 200 mm from the center of the forward binding-mounting area. For the rear binding, this inner transverse line may be located 230 mm or even 210 mm from the center of the rear mounting area. Likewise, on the forward side, the outer transverse line may be 100 mm, 110 mm or 120 mm from the center of the forward binding-mounting area. On the rear side, the outer transverse line may be 120 mm, 130 mm or 140 mm from the center of the rear binding-mounting area. Depending on the type of geometry of the mounting area, and particularly on the capacity thereof to accommodate bindings in multiple adjustment positions, the two transverse lines may be selected in accordance with the aforementioned predetermined locations.
In practice, the central position of the binding-mounting area corresponds to the middle (in the longitudinal direction) of the binding-mounting points, or to the middle of the binding centers between the two extreme positions of the binding. In a widely found type of binding, a mechanism is used for screwing the base plate, or an intermediary such as a disk, onto the board at four points formed by inserts built in when the board is manufactured. These mounting points could also be created after the board is manufactured, at the request of the user. There are also bindings wherein the number of locking points is different, without this departing from the framework of the present invention, in so far as it is possible to determine the center of the mounting area as being at the middle of the binding centers between the two extreme positions of the binding, which can be embodied by markers on the board. Reference may for example be made to the mechanism described in the document FR 2 791 268, according to which the center of the mounting area is in the middle of the rail into which the locking pin is inserted, or again on a dedicated marking.
Furthermore, it is frequently the case that boards are designed so that the bindings can be mounted in a plurality of different positions, so as thereby to allow an adjustment of the “stance”, or in other words the width between the feet of the user. This also allows the longitudinal position of the mid-point between the feet to be adjusted. In this case, the board has different inserts which are distributed longitudinally, from which the center of the mounting area can be defined, as being the center of mass of the centers of the mounting points for the different positions that the binding is able to adopt.
The invention thus comprises combining a positioning of the contact lines substantially between the feet of the user with a board turn-up allowing optimized control when executing a turn.
According to another inventive feature, plumb with the centers of the forward and/or rear binding-mounting areas, the running surface of the board is separated from the horizontal plane on which it lies by a distance of between 0.5 and 4 mm, preferentially between 1 and 3 mm, and very preferentially in the vicinity of 2 mm.
Complementarily, at a distance of 50 mm short of the wider lines, the running surface of the board is separated from the horizontal plane on which it lies by a distance of between 3 and 9 mm, preferentially between 4 and 8 mm, and very preferentially between 5 and 7 mm.
These measurements are taken with the board laden at the center, its camber being canceled. It is important to note that at these different points where the height of the running surface is measured, we are beyond the contact line, in the shovel, and not in the camber, unlike with conventional boards.
Indeed, it has been noted that the board turn-up forward from the forward contact line has a significant influence on the maneuverability and control thereof. Thus, when the board is perfectly flat, the portion of the edges in contact with the snow extends between the forward and rear contact lines. On the other hand, it should be noted that this is no longer the case when executing a turn, when the board is no longer lying flat on the snow, or also in soft snow. In this event, the portion of the sidecut which comes into contact with the snow extends beyond the forward and rear contact lines, and theoretically as far as the widest points of the board in the event of an extreme tilt. It has been determined that for the most widely used intermediate tilts, of about 30°, a compromise needs to be made as regards the way in which the board turns up beyond the contact lines. Thus, and according to one of the inventive features, this influence is determined by measuring the height of the board at different longitudinal levels, and in particular plumb with the centers of the binding-mounting areas, as well as at a point located short of the wider lines, and typically at a distance of about 50 mm from said lines.
Thus, the height measured at these points will not have to be too large at the risk of too greatly reducing the length of the sidecut in contact with the snow in the event of a standard tilt. Conversely, this height must be not too low either since otherwise, when starting a turn, and for very small tilts, of about 10°, the sidecut grip points would be very much offset towards the front and the rear relative to the contact lines. Put another way, board maneuverability would be reduced because of the too low height of the characteristic point where the height in question is measured.
The characteristic positioning of the contact lines, substantially between the binding-mounting areas, has the advantage that the intrinsic camber of the board is increased when the board is laden with the user. Indeed, the stresses caused by the weight of the user are applied outside the contact lines, around which the board is deformed under the effect of the weight of the user. The camber with the board laden with the user is slightly more significant than that of the non-laden board, in contrast to conventional boards. It will be noted therefore that the positions of the contact lines according to ISO standard 6289 are measured with a canceled camber, the board being laden at the center, whereas in normal operation, the inventive board is laden with the weight of the user in characteristic zones away from the center of the board, so that the camber is not canceled.
This characteristic positioning of the forward and rear contact lines may also be defined in a relative way as a function of the mid-position of the two binding-mounting areas, and to be more specific of the two centers of said zones. In practice, it is also possible to define the distance between the two contact lines, which corresponds to the running length, and which is 320 mm maximum.
The advantage in relation to the characteristic arrangement of the contact lines may be further enhanced by a complementary arrangement in respect of board thickness. Provision may thus be made to reduce the thickness of the board in a peripheral area.
Said area may extend over the entire periphery of the board, or be limited only to the front and rear portions, with a constant thickness being retained in the waist area as far as the lateral edges.
The reduction in thickness may give the shape of a bevel, with the sliding surface in these peripheral areas which forms a slight non-zero angle (typically of the order of a few degrees) relative to the sliding running surface in the central area thereof.
The way in which the invention may be embodied, together with the advantages arising therefrom, will become clearer from the description and the following embodiment, supported by the appended figures wherein:
Clearly, the dimensions and different proportions featuring on the drawing are given for the main purpose of facilitating understanding of the invention, and may be at variance with the actual dimensions and proportions.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Whatever type of binding and mounting point is used, it is possible to define a central point 20,21 as being the middle or center of symmetry of the different mounting points 10,11 of the binding. This point also corresponds to the intersection of the longitudinal axis of the foot, with the longitudinal axis 8 of the board when the binding is in its median position of longitudinal adjustment.
In accordance with the invention, the forward and rear contact lines of the board are defined so that they are located substantially between the binding-mounting areas, and thereby between the zones where direct pressure is applied by the user. The contact lines are determined with the camber canceled, using a 0.1 mm thick gage. To be more specific, as shown in
According to one inventive feature, the forward contact line 33 is therefore between the two characteristic boundaries 30,31.
The same reasoning applies for the rear binding-mounting area, it being understood that the distances D3, D4 separating the characteristic lines 35,36 from the central point 21 of the rear binding-mounting area, may be identical or preferentially different from those of the forward binding-mounting area.
As shown in
According to another inventive feature, and as shown in
On the rear shovel side of the board, a similar turn-up is measured, at a distance D6, also of 50 mm from the wider line 4. At this point, the bottom surface of the board is at a distance H2 from the horizontal plane on which it lies, said distance H2 being able to be equal to the distance H1 measured on the other side of the board, or once again different.
Complementarily, plumb with the center 20 of the forward binding-mounting area 14, the bottom surface of the board is separated from the horizontal plane on which the board lies, by a distance H3 of between 0.5 and 4 mm. In practice, this distance is measured when the board is laden at its center and its camber is therefore canceled. Symmetrically, at the center 21 of the rear binding-mounting area 15, the bottom surface of the board is separated from the horizontal plane on which the board lies, by a distance H4 which may be equal to or different from H3, and of between 0.5 and 3 mm.
It is clear from what has been said above that the inventive sliding board has a great many advantages, particularly the possibility of being used both on compacted snow and powder snow, with the same ease of use and the same maneuverability.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 50406 | Jan 2010 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5667238 | Sarver | Sep 1997 | A |
5823562 | Stubblefield | Oct 1998 | A |
6102428 | Bobrowicz | Aug 2000 | A |
6189912 | Ritzinger | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6315317 | Liard et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6382658 | Stubblefield | May 2002 | B1 |
6986525 | Liard | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7798514 | Canaday et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7823892 | Olson et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8029013 | Canaday et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
20010052679 | Stubblefield | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20040262884 | Langford et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060226613 | Wilson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080106068 | Drake et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080272575 | Olson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080290621 | Vailli | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090256333 | Canaday et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100013191 | McKeever | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20110079986 | Gradman et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1935459 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2791268 | Sep 2000 | FR |
9833563 | Aug 1998 | WO |
9910053 | Mar 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
French Search Report; Application No. FR 1050406; Oct. 4, 2010; 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110175326 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |