The present invention relates generally to integrated circuit (IC) devices, and more particularly to body bias circuits and methods for insulated gate field effect transistors of IC devices.
Integrated circuit (IC) devices can be subject to manufacturing variations that can impact performance. In a typical IC device, electrical signals can be transmitted via an interconnect structure formed by multiple metallization layers, separated from one another by interlayer dielectrics (ILDs). Signals can be generated by transistors driving metallization layers between different potentials.
Many fabrication processes utilize chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) to planarize ILD surfaces. While CMP can improve planarization over other fabrication methods, it can still impart systematic and random thickness variations at the lot, wafer, die and pattern levels. Die level variation in such structures can result in performance and timing differences in the same type of devices. In particular, signal transmission paths can be affected by variations in metal-metal capacitance inherent in an interconnect structure. Differences in metal-metal capacitance can arise from variations in dielectric thickness between metallization lines and/or variations in metal thickness and width. Differences in resistance can also arise from such variations in metal thickness and width.
Active devices (e.g., transistors) may also be subject to some variation in performance. For example, uncontrollable manufacturing variations can result in “fast” transistors and “slow” transistors. Fast transistors can provide faster driving capability than slow transistors. Such fast vs. slow variations can be systematic, i.e., they can affect the mean value of performance parameters.
These and other variations can result in IC devices having differing performance limits. Conventionally, timing paths can be designed with sufficient margin to be adequate for a slowest case. This can require large signal driving devices and increased power consumption, as well as increased design effort. For some very high performance IC devices, such variations can present a limit to device speed and/or reliability.
Various embodiments of the present invention will now be described in detail with reference to a number of drawings. The embodiments show integrated circuits and methods for biasing bodies of transistors in an integrated circuit device, where such biasing can be based on performance of actual circuit structures present on the integrated circuit device.
In the various embodiments below, like items are referred to by the same reference character but the leading digits corresponding to the figure number.
Each monitoring section (102-0 to -n) can include physical circuit elements of the IC device 100 that can vary according to process variation. Monitoring sections (102-0 to -n) can output monitor values M0 to Mn that reflect variations in performance resulting from variations in process. In particular embodiments, each monitoring section (102-0 to -n) can provide a monitor value (M0 to Mn) that is dominated by one or more particular process features. In the particular embodiment shown, monitor sections (102-0 to -n) include those dominated by: n-type transistor performance, p-type transistor performance, wiring, and diffusion. It is understood that such features are but exemplary. In some embodiments, a monitoring section can include a ring oscillator circuit having an oscillating frequency reflecting the effect of one or more sources of process variations. However, in particular embodiments, a monitoring section can include a transistor drive monitoring section, embodiments of which are described in more detail below.
Monitor sections (102-0 to -n) can provide monitor values in various ways. For example, in some embodiments or modes of operation, monitor sections (102-0 to -n) can be operational during a test or characterization phase. Monitor values (M0 to Mn) generated in the test/characterization phase can be stored such that they remain fixed throughout the operation of the device. After the monitor values have been generated, the combination logic section 104 can access the stored monitor values to set the n-type and p-type transistor body bias voltages based on one or more of the stored monitor values during the operation of the device. The monitor values can be stored in internal storage that is part of the combination logic section 104, or in external storage that is located outside the combination logic section 104 and accessed by the combination logic section 104.
In other embodiments or modes of operation, monitor sections (102-0 to -n) can be activated periodically and/or constantly, allowing monitor values to be updated while the device is in operation. In such embodiments, a combination logic section 104 can receive the periodically or continuously updated monitor values (102-0 to -n) and modify the n-type and p-type body bias voltages based on the updated monitor values.
In still other embodiments or modes of operation, monitor sections (102-0 to -n) can be enabled in response to a command input to the IC device 100, where the monitor sections generate and store updated monitor values during a test/characterization phase that is initiated in response to receiving the command input at the IC device. In other embodiments, the monitor sections (102-0 to -n) can be enabled in response to received status information indicative of particular conditions or changes to particular conditions (e.g., power-on, reset, temperature, power supply voltage, etc.). For example, the test/characterization phase can be initiated if temperature exceeds a predetermined threshold value, such that monitor sections (102-0 to -n) are enabled to generate and store updated monitor values that are used to modify the n-type and p-type body bias voltages.
A combination logic section 104 can receive monitor values (M0 to Mn), and from such values, generates n-type and p-type body bias control values (NBias, PBias). In particular embodiments, a combination logic section 104 can assign different weights to one or more of the monitor values (M0 to Mn) such that particular monitor values (M0 to Mn) have a greater weight over others, to reflect how one type of process variation can have a greater effect than other types of process variations on a particular performance characteristic of a circuit within the IC device 100. In this way, body biases can be tuned to optimize an IC device for a particular performance target. In some embodiments, bias control values (NBias, PBias) can be static during the operation of the IC device 100. However, in other embodiments, such values can be static, changing according to mode of operation, and/or operating conditions. Additionally, the weights can compensate for differing sensitivities of the monitoring circuits to the variations, as well as the IC's sensitivity to such variations.
It is noted that bias control values (NBias, PBias) generated by a combination logic section 104 can be digital or analog values.
An n-type body bias circuit 106-0 can receive a bias control value (NBias), and in response generate an n-channel transistor body bias voltage (Vbn). That is, a voltage Vbn can vary according to the bias control value NBias. In very particular embodiments, Vbn can vary from a “back bias” level (VBB) to a forward bias level (VFB). A back bias level can force a body region below a low power supply voltage (e.g., less than VSS) to increase a threshold voltage, but lower a switching speed of an n-type transistor (as compared to such a transistor having a body bias of VSS). In contrast, a forward bias level can force a body region above a low power supply voltage (e.g., greater than VSS) to lower a threshold voltage of a transistor, but increase a switching speed of an n-type transistor (as compared to such a transistor having a body bias of VSS).
In a similar fashion, a p-type body bias circuit 106-1 can receive a bias control value (PBias), and in response, generate a p-channel transistor body bias voltage (Vbp). In certain embodiments, Vbp can vary from a “back bias” level (e.g., greater than a high power supply voltage VDD) to a “forward bias” level (e.g., less than VDD).
An operational section 150 can include transistors formed with body regions that can receive the body bias voltages (Vbn, Vbp). Such transistors can be arranged to provide a predetermined function as part of different functional blocks having different predetermined target performance characteristics, where the performance of each functional block can be independently adjusted by selection of the n-type and p-type body bias voltages. Accordingly, an operational section 150 can include n-type transistors formed in p-type body regions 108-0, and p-type transistors formed in n-type body regions 108-1. Body regions (108-0/1) can vary according to transistor type. Various examples of transistors that can have a body bias will be described in more detail below.
Body bias voltages (Vbn, Vbp) can be applied to transistors of operational section 150 to compensate for process variations detected by monitoring sections (102-0 to -n). Thus, if a metallization structure presents a high capacitance, resulting in a slower signal transmission speed, a body bias voltage can be lowered, to increase the driving speed of the transistors in the device. Similarly, if such transistors are considered “slow” transistors, a body bias voltage can be reduced or increased, for p-type and n-type transistors respectively, to bring the performance of the transistors back into a desired speed range. The opposite type of adjustment is possible as well. If metallization presents a smaller capacitance or transistors are “fast”, a body bias can be increased or decreased to compensate for these variations by corresponding changes of the transistor speeds in response to the applied body bias.
A weight value store 212 can provide weight values (W0 to Wi) to increase or decrease the effect that a monitor value can have on a resulting bias control value (PBias, NBias), typically achieved by multiplying the monitor value by the corresponding weight value. In some embodiments, weight values (W0 to Wi) can be determined through simulation or characterization of circuits within an integrated circuit device. In other embodiments, weight values (W0 to Wi) can be established by testing integrated devices of a same manufacturing group (e.g., lot), or by circuits on the device itself (such as monitor sections, described herein). Once such weight values are determined, the values (W0 to Wn) can remain fixed during the operation of the device, or alternatively, can be updated during the operation of the device. A monitor value store 210 can be formed with any suitable storage elements, including non-volatile elements, volatile storage elements (e.g., flash memory, fuses, SRAM, latches), or combinations of thereof. In the case of fixed weight values, a back end process, such as the opening of fusible links can be used to set the weight values.
A bias value generator circuit 214 can apply weighting values (W0 to Wn) to corresponding monitor values (M0 to Mn), and combine the results to generate bias control values (NBias, PBias) that are responsive to the weighting values (W0 to Wn) and the monitor values (M0 to Mn). A bias value generator circuit 214 can include any circuits suitable for combining/weighting monitor values. In some embodiments, a bias value generator circuit 214 can be an analog circuit, combining/multiplying voltages or currents. In other embodiments, a bias value generator circuit 214 can be a digital circuit, combining digital values through operations such as binary addition and multiplication. In the latter case, a bias value generator circuit 214 can be formed with custom logic, programmable logic, and/or can include a processor executing predetermined instructions.
It is noted that a combination logic section 204 can also modify a bias control value in response to additional control parameters. As but one example, the bias control values (e.g., NBias and/or PBias) can be adjusted according to a power supply voltage of the device. Such one or more of the bias control values can be adjusted by a predetermined amount if a change on the power supply voltage exceeds a threshold value. Such adjustments can be performed by directly modifying the bias control values, modifying the stored monitor values (M0 to Mn), or adjusting the weights (W0 to Wn) in response to received values of the control parameters.
A load section 318 can include an impedance that is driven by TUT section 316 in a monitor operation. In some embodiments, a load section 318 can include circuit elements (e.g., capacitors) formed with physical structures of an IC device, to reflect process variations of such structures.
A monitor section 320 can generate a monitor value Mx reflecting a TUT section 316 driving a load section 318. For example, in embodiments where the load section 318 is a capacitor, the monitor section 320 generates the monitor value Mx by first charging the capacitor to a predetermined first voltage. Typically, the TUT section is configured to be in a non-conductive state while the capacitor is being pre-charged to set a predetermined initial condition prior to the TUT measurement operation. (In certain embodiments, the capacitor can be pre-discharged to set the initial condition. For simplicity we use the terms pre-charged and dis-charged for the setting of the initial conditions and TUT measurement operations, respectively). After the capacitor has been charged to the predetermined first voltage, the monitor section 320 stops charging the capacitor and configures the TUT section 316 to a conductive state such that the capacitor starts discharging to a second predetermined voltage through the TUT section 316. Thus, a drive monitoring circuit 302 can be “dominated” by the performance of transistor(s) in TUT section 316 and/or physical features of an IC device reflected by load section 318. If different TUT sections 316 are used discharge a capacitor that is charged to the same predetermined first voltage, the rate at which the capacitor is discharged through the TUT section 316 represents the speed of the TUT section. Alternatively, if different load sections or different capacitors that are representative of different physical features of the IC device are charged to the same first predetermined voltage, and the same TUT section is used to discharge these load sections, then the rate at which the load section 318 is discharged represents the magnitude of the load resulting from the physical features of the IC device associated with the load section 318. Alternative embodiments of the drive monitoring circuit 302, can first discharge the load section 318 to a first predetermined voltage, and subsequently charge it to a second predetermined voltage through the TUT, where the rate of charging the load section 318 can represent the performance of the load section 318 or the TUT section 316.
A load section 418 can be a capacitance, which in the embodiment shown, is connected between monitor node 426 and low power supply voltage VSS. Load section 418 can be charged to a predetermined voltage by monitor circuit 420 through switch element 421, and in a subsequent monitor operation, can be discharged by TUT section 416.
A monitor circuit 420 can include a switch element 421, a comparator 422, and a counter circuit 424. A switch element 421 can charge monitor node 426 to (or toward) VDD in response to a Start output from counter circuit 424. A comparator 422 can have a negative polarity input (labeled “−” in
A counter circuit 424 can generate a count value Mx(count) that corresponds (i.e., is inversely proportional) to a speed at which a load section 418 can be discharged by TUT section 416. In particular, counter circuit 424 can start a count operation while simultaneously activating a Start signal. The activated Start signal can start a monitor operation by disabling switch element 421 and enabling TUT section 416, thereby starting the discharge of the load section 418 through the TUT. When an output of comparator 422 goes high, i.e. after the monitor node has discharged to reference voltage Vref, the “Stop” signal is activated and the count operation stops.
At time t1, a Start output is activated (driven high). Switch element 421 is disabled and TUT section 416 is enabled. As a result, load section 418 starts to discharge toward VSS. At the same time, monitor circuit 420 initiates the count operation. The count operation continues as long as the voltage at the monitor node 426 exceeds the reference voltage Vref, and output of comparator 422 remains low.
At time t2, as the monitor node continues to discharge through TUT section 416 if the voltage at the monitor node 426 falls below Vref. As a result, the comparator 422 transitions to a high voltage level, thereby activating the “Stop” signal and stopping the count operation. The resulting count value after time count operation has stopped is the monitor value Mx(count).
At time t3, a Start output can return to the inactive state. TUT section 416 can be disabled and switch element 421 can be enabled. As a result, monitor node 426 can be pre-charged once again to VDD, and the monitor operation can be repeated.
Thus, the TUT section 516 of the drive monitor circuit 502 is composed of a p-channel TUT having a source-drain path connected between a monitor node 526 and a high power supply voltage VDD, and a gate connected to a “StartN” signal generated by a counter circuit 524. In a monitor operation, the TUT section 516 can charge the monitor node 526 from a predetermined initial voltage (which is a negative voltage in this embodiment) to (or toward) VDD, where the time interval to charge the monitor node to a reference voltage level Vref is representative of the performance of the TUT section 516.
The load section 518 can be a capacitance, which in the embodiment shown is connected between the monitor node 526 and the high power supply voltage VDD. The monitor circuit 520 can include a switch element 521, a comparator 522, and a counter circuit 524. The “StartN” signal generated by the counter circuit 524 is an active-low signal that starts the monitor operation when it is at a low voltage level. When the “StartN” signal is at a high voltage level, the switch element 521 pre-discharges the monitor node 526 towards VSS, and therefore, the load section 518 is discharged until the voltage across the load section 518 is −VDD (or negative VDD). Subsequently, the counter circuit 524 starts a count operation and simultaneously activates the “StartN” signal by placing a low voltage level on that signal. The activated “StartN” signal starts the monitor operation by disabling switch element 521 and enabling the TUT section 516, thereby starting to charge the load section 518 through the TUT section 516. The charging of the load section continues either as long as the “StartN” signal is asserted, or until the monitor node voltage reaches VDD (i.e., the load section 518 has been charged such that the voltage across the load section 518 increases from −VSS to VDD). As the monitor node voltage increases from VSS towards VDD, the output of the comparator 522 goes high after the monitor node voltage exceeds the reference voltage Vref. This activates the “Stop” signal and stops the count operation of the counter circuit 524. The resulting count value after the count operation has stopped is the monitor value Mx(count).
An IC can have different transistor types, sizes, etc. comprising those on the critical timing paths, so it can be useful to monitor multiple devices by having corresponding TUTs. These multiple TUTs can have individual loads or may share loads.
A TUT section 616 can include multiple TUTs (628-0 to -i) and a multiplexer (MUX) 630. In response to select inputs TUT_SEL, one of TUTs (628-0 to -i) can be connected to monitor node 626. In the particular embodiment shown, TUTs can include a low threshold voltage transistor (LVT), a standard threshold voltage transistor (SVT) (which is slower than LVT transistors), and a high threshold voltage transistor (HVT) (which is slower than both SVT and LVT transistors). However, in other embodiments, TUTs can include transistors having other differences (e.g., doping profiles, width/length ratios, oxide thicknesses, etc.). Also, while
A MUX 630 can be formed from the same device types as corresponding TUTs (i.e., n-channel, p-channel). That is, a charge/discharge path flows through a transistor(s) having a same conductivity type. In other embodiments, a MUX 630 can include signal paths formed by complementary conductivity (e.g., CMOS) devices, which can introduce substantially no threshold voltage drop into the charge/discharge path. Regardless, the conductivity of the MUX should be much greater than that of the TUT so that the result is not significantly impacted. Alternatively, the weights and Vref on the comparator can be adjusted so that the measurement results properly represents the TUT and load combination.
Switching in different TUT types can enable a monitor value to represent the performance of such a transistor type.
A load section 618 can include multiple loads (634-0 to -j) and a multiplexer (MUX) 632. In response to select inputs Z_SEL, one of loads (634-0 to -j) can be connected to monitor node 626. In the particular embodiment shown, loads can include capacitors formed by various structures of an IC device, and hence can reflect process variations of the device. In
However, in other embodiments, loads (634-0 to -j) can include other impedance types, or combinations of impedances, such as resistance, inductance, etc.
Switching in different load types can enable a monitor value to represent the delay caused by the capacitance presented by such a load type. Additionally, in the presence of systemic variation of the IC, the monitor value can also represent the performance impact resulting from such variations.
However, unlike
Accordingly, in operation, a drive monitor circuit 702 can evaluate circuit element performance by executing different monitor operations, as described herein or equivalents, that select different combinations of TUTs (728-0 to 728-i) with different loads (734-0 to 734-j). It is understood that such different monitor operations can select a single TUT and a single load, multiple TUTs and a single load, a single TUT and multiple loads, as multiple TUTs with multiple loads.
For example, in embodiments where the load section 718 includes a capacitor, the monitor section 720 can evaluate the performance of one or more transistors included in the TUT section 716 by performing a monitor operation for each of the transistors while setting the select input Z_SEL to connect the same capacitor of the load section 718 to the monitor node 726. During each monitor operation the monitor section 720 selects one of the TUTs of the TUT section 716 using the TUT_SEL input (e.g., TUT0, . . . , TUTi) and generates the monitor value Mx for the selected TUT by first charging the load section 718 to a predetermined first voltage. Typically, the TUT section 716 is configured to be in a non-conductive state while the load section 718 is being charged. After the load section 718 has been charged to VDD, the monitor operation is started by asserting the “Start” signal of the counter circuit 724 and simultaneously starting the count operation of the counter circuit 724. This stops the charging of the load section 718 and configures the selected TUT of the TUT section 716 to a conductive state such that the load section 718 starts discharging to VSS through the selected TUT. This discharging of the load section 718 continues either as long as the “Start” signal is asserted, or until the monitor node voltage reaches VSS (i.e., the load section 718 has been discharged such that the voltage across the load section 718 decreases from VDD to VSS). As the monitor node voltage decreases from VDD towards VSS, the output of the comparator 722 goes high after the monitor node 726 voltage goes below the reference voltage Vref. This activates the “Stop” signal and stops the count operation of the counter circuit 724. The resulting count value after the count operation has stopped is the monitor value Mx(count). After the monitor value for the selected TUT has been completed, the performance of additional TUTs in the TUT section are evaluated by charging the load section 718 to VDD, setting TUT_SEL input to a value that selects the next TUT of the TUT section 716 that is to be evaluated, and performing another monitor operation by activating the start signal to obtain the monitor value Mx for the next TUT. This process can be repeated to obtain the monitor value for additional TUTs in the TUT section 718.
Alternatively, the monitor circuit 702 can evaluate the performance impact resulting from different process variations and physical features of the IC device by performing the monitor operation for corresponding loads of the load section 718, e.g. 734-0 . . . j, under the control of the load select signal Z_SEL, while using the same TUT section to discharge the selected load section, then the rate at which the selected load section is discharged represents the performance impact of the load resulting from the process variation or physical feature of the IC device associated with the selected load. The value of the load select signal Z_SEL can be changed to select additional loads in the load section 718, and the steps for charging the monitor node 726 and subsequently discharging it using the same TUT section can be repeated to evaluate the performance impact of additional sources of process variation or physical features of the ID device.
Other M-M capacitors can be formed with single interdigitated metallization layer, to monitor a capacitance arising from lateral separation of wirings. Similarly, other M-M capacitors can be formed by vertically stacked metallization layers, to monitor a capacitance arising from vertical separation of wirings.
A capacitance between such layers (partially represented by capacitances C0 to C7) can vary according to process variation. Accordingly, by including capacitors formed by combinations of metallization layers as load elements in monitoring sections, the effect of such processes variation can be compensated for, to optimize circuit performance.
In the embodiment shown, an n-type body bias circuit 1006-0 can include a charge pump 1047 and a frequency adjust (frequency control) circuit 1046. A charge pump 1047 can drive its output Vbn to a potential based on a clock signal CLK_Q. Frequency adjust circuit 1046 can generate clock signal CLK_Q according to bias control values NBias, which can be generated as described for embodiments herein, or equivalents. Thus, to increase a magnitude of Vbn (i.e., drive Vbn to a lower potential), an NBias value can cause frequency adjust circuit 1046 to increase the frequency of CLK_Q. Conversely, to decrease a magnitude of Vbn (i.e., drive Vbn to a higher potential), an NBias value can cause frequency adjust circuit 1046 to decrease the frequency of CLK_Q.
In the embodiment shown, a p-type body bias circuit 1006-1 can include a switched capacitor network 1045 and a switch control circuit 1044. A switched capacitor network 1045 can drive its output Vbp to a potential based on a switch control network 1044. Switch control network 1044 can generate control signals based on bias control values PBias, which can be generated as described for embodiments herein, or equivalents.
Body bias circuits as described herein, can generate forward body bias voltages VFB and reverse body bias voltages VBB. In particular embodiments, a forward body bias voltage can be generated by creating a voltage offset from a generated body bias voltage. One such embodiment is shown in
A p-type body bias circuit 1106-1 can generate a body bias voltage Vbp based on bias control values PBias. Bias control values PBias can be generated according to weighted monitor values, as described herein. That is, PBias can be a function of one or more monitor values (Mx) weighted by one or more weight values (Wx). In one particular embodiment, a body bias voltage Vbp can be a reverse body bias voltage VRB that can increase a threshold voltage and decrease leakage of a p-channel transistor.
A voltage offset circuit 1148 can generate a voltage having a predetermined offset with respect to a received voltage. In some embodiments, an offset can be a voltage lower than a received voltage. In the embodiment shown, voltage offset circuit 1148 can generate a voltage V1, where V1=Vbp−Voffset. V1 can be a forward body bias voltage VFB. In one particular embodiment, a voltage offset circuit can be a Widlar voltage source circuit, but any suitable offset circuit can be employed.
A mode select MUX 1150 can selectively apply either Vbp or V1 as a body bias voltage for power switching device 1152. In one mode (e.g., an active or high performance mode), mode select MUX 1150 can apply V1 as a body bias voltage, to lower a threshold voltage of a switching device 1152. In a second mode (e.g., an inactive or low leakage mode), mode select MUX 1150 can apply Vbp as a body bias voltage, to increase a threshold voltage of a switching device 1152.
A switching device 1152 can be one or more p-channel transistors having a body connected to an output of mode select MUX 1150, a source connected to a high power supply VDD, a drain connected to an internal power supply node 1158, and a gate connected to receive an enable signal EN. By operation of switching device 1152, a voltage VDD_PG can be generated at internal power supply node 1158, to provide power to load section 1156.
A load section 1156 can be connected between internal power supply node 1158 and a low power supply VSS. In some embodiments, a load section 1156 can include a circuit that provides some predetermined function for the IC device containing the power switching circuit 1100.
A core section 1262 can perform a predetermined function, and can include complementary (i.e., p-channel and n-channel) transistors, having bodies that receive adjustable body bias voltages (Vpcore, Vbn). A core section 1262 can be formed between an internal power supply node 1258 VDD_PG and a low power supply node VSS. In one embodiment, an internal power supply node 1258 VDD_PG can correspond to that shown as 1158 in
Core bias MUX 1260 can selectively apply either a body bias voltage Vbp or the voltage at internal power supply node VDD_PG (which can be less than Vbp), according to a mode value MODE_SEL. More particularly, in one mode (e.g., an active or high performance mode), core bias MUX 1260 can apply VDD_PG as a body bias voltage. In a second mode (e.g., an inactive or low leakage mode), core bias MUX 1260 can apply Vbp as a body bias voltage. Such a local switching of the p-channel wells of core section 1262 can reduce band to band tunneling junction current when a switching device (i.e., 1152 of
In some embodiments, body biasing, as described for a power gating switch in
A voltage regulating circuit 1300 can also include a low dropout regulator (LDO) section 1368 and core section 1362. An LDO section 1368 can include a regulating device 1352, a mode control MUX 1364, and an amplifier 1366. A regulating device 1352 can be a p-channel transistor having a body connected to an output of mode select MUX 1350, a source connected to a high power supply VDD, a drain connected to a regulated node 1358, and a gate connected to receive a regulation control voltage Vreg, output from mode control MUX 1364.
A mode control MUX 1364 can selectively output either a high power supply voltage VDD or an output of amplifier 1366. In one mode (e.g., a regulated mode), mode control MUX 1364 can apply the output of amplifier 1366, which can drive a gate of regulating device 1352 to maintain regulated node 1358 at a predetermined voltage. In a second mode (e.g., an inactive or low leakage mode), mode control MUX 1364 can apply VDD as a body bias voltage, to turn off regulating device 1352.
An amplifier 1366 can provide an output that can vary according to a feedback voltage Vfdbk provided from core section 1362. Thus, if a voltage at regulated node 1358 is too low, Vfdbk can fall below Vref, and an output of amplifier 1366 can be driven lower. Conversely, if a voltage at regulated node 1358 is too high, Vfdbk can rise above Vref, and an output of amplifier 1366 can be driven higher.
A core section 1362 is represented by load sections 1356-0 and 1356-1. It is understood that such sections (1356-0/1) can represent circuits for performing the various functions of an IC device.
Body biasing as described for embodiments herein can be applied to bodies of various transistor types. Examples of some transistor types which can receive a body bias voltage are shown in
In
As in the case of
Embodiments of various structures and manufacturing processes suitable for use in DDC transistors are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/708,497, filed on Feb. 18, 2010, titled Electronic Devices and Systems, and Methods for Making and Using the Same, by Scott E. Thompson et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 8,273,617, issued on Sep. 25, 2012, titled Low Power Semiconductor Transistor Structure and Method of Fabrication Thereof; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/971,955 filed on Dec. 17, 2010 titled Transistor with Threshold Voltage Set Notch and Method of Fabrication Thereof; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/895,785 filed on Sep. 30, 2010 titled “Advanced Transistors With Threshold Voltage Set Dopant Structures”; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/071,399 filed on Mar. 24, 2011, titled “Analog Circuits Having Improved Transistors, and Method Therefor”, by Lawrence T. Clark et al; the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. In addition, methods and structures for modifying the threshold voltage of DDC transistors are discussed in pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/459,971 titled “Multiple Transistor Types Formed in a Common Epitaxial Layer by Differential Out-diffusion from a Doped Underlayer”, filed Apr. 30, 2012, the entirety of which disclosure is incorporated by reference herein.
It is understood that, with appropriate change to substrate or dopant material, conductivities of any of the transistors described above can be switched (i.e., from p-channel to n-channel and vice versa).
Having described various circuit features, methods of monitoring and adjusting transistor performance will now be described.
Accordingly, according to monitor results, a body bias voltage can be adjusted to bring a transistor performance within a desired limit. Thus, if devices are manufactured having different transistor performance, such difference can be detected by monitoring circuits, and a body bias adjusted to enable the devices to have similar or substantially identical performance to the nominal case. Thus the IC can have its systematic variability compensated towards the nominal IC performance, thereby limiting IC non-uniformity due to manufacturing variations.
The monitor circuit embodiments described above can be used to implement a fine grained body biasing scheme, where the body bias voltages used for individual functional blocks or different regions of the integrated circuit can be independently adjusted to compensate for local variations (e.g., process, temperature, or voltage variations) across the integrated circuit.
The integrated circuit 1700 uses one body bias generator 1750 that generates a pmos body bias voltage and an nmos body bias voltage sufficient to provide the highest body bias voltage that is to be supplied to the p-channel and n-channel transistors, respectively, of the functional blocks in the integrated circuit 1700. The nmos and pmos body bias voltages generated by the body bias generator 1750 are distributed to the functional blocks 1702-1708 using wires 1752 and 1754, respectively. The body bias tuning circuit at each functional block, receives the body bias voltages on the wires 1752 and 1754, and generates local pmos and nmos body bias voltages for the corresponding functional block in accordance with the body bias control signal received from the monitor circuit of that functional block. In alternative embodiments, where only one body bias voltage is required (e.g., only the nmos or pmos transistors are back biased), the body bias generator 1750 can generate only one body bias voltage, and only one wire can be used to distribute that body bias voltage to the functional blocks in the integrated circuit.
It should be appreciated that in the foregoing description of exemplary embodiments of the invention, various features of the invention are sometimes grouped together in a single embodiment, figure, or description thereof for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure aiding in the understanding of one or more of the various inventive aspects. This method of disclosure, however, is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed invention requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the claims following the detailed description are hereby expressly incorporated into this detailed description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment of this invention.
It is also understood that the embodiments of the invention may be practiced in the absence of an element and/or step not specifically disclosed. That is, an inventive feature of the invention may be elimination of an element.
Accordingly, while the various aspects of the particular embodiments set forth herein have been described in detail, the present invention could be subject to various changes, substitutions, and alterations without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/668,063 filed on Nov. 2, 2012.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3958266 | Athanas | May 1976 | A |
4000504 | Berger | Dec 1976 | A |
4021835 | Etoh et al. | May 1977 | A |
4242691 | Kotani et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4276095 | Beilstein, Jr. et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4315781 | Henderson | Feb 1982 | A |
4518926 | Swanson | May 1985 | A |
4559091 | Allen et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4578128 | Mundt et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4617066 | Vasudev | Oct 1986 | A |
4662061 | Malhi | May 1987 | A |
4761384 | Neppl et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4780748 | Cunningham et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4819043 | Yazawa et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4885477 | Bird et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4908681 | Nishida et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4945254 | Robbins | Jul 1990 | A |
4956311 | Liou et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5034337 | Mosher et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5144378 | Hikosaka | Sep 1992 | A |
5156989 | Williams et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5156990 | Mitchell | Oct 1992 | A |
5166765 | Lee et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5208473 | Komori et al. | May 1993 | A |
5294821 | Iwamatsu | Mar 1994 | A |
5298763 | Shen et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5369288 | Usuki | Nov 1994 | A |
5373186 | Schubert et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5384476 | Nishizawa et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5426328 | Yilmaz et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5444008 | Han et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5552332 | Tseng et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559368 | Hu et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5608253 | Liu et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5622880 | Burr et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624863 | Helm et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625568 | Edwards et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5641980 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5663583 | Matloubian et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5712501 | Davies et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5719422 | Burr et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5726488 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5726562 | Mizuno | Mar 1998 | A |
5731626 | Eaglesham et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5736419 | Naem | Apr 1998 | A |
5753555 | Hada | May 1998 | A |
5754826 | Gamal et al. | May 1998 | A |
5756365 | Kakumu | May 1998 | A |
5763921 | Okumura et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5780899 | Hu et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5847419 | Imai et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5856003 | Chiu | Jan 1999 | A |
5861334 | Rho | Jan 1999 | A |
5877049 | Liu et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885876 | Dennen | Mar 1999 | A |
5889315 | Farrenkopf et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5895954 | Yasumura et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899714 | Farremkopf et al. | May 1999 | A |
5918129 | Fulford, Jr. et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5923067 | Voldman | Jul 1999 | A |
5923987 | Burr | Jul 1999 | A |
5936868 | Hall | Aug 1999 | A |
5946214 | Heavlin | Aug 1999 | A |
5985705 | Seliskar | Nov 1999 | A |
5989963 | Luning et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6001695 | Wu | Dec 1999 | A |
6020227 | Bulucea | Feb 2000 | A |
6043139 | Eaglesham et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6060345 | Hause et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060364 | Maszara et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066533 | Yu | May 2000 | A |
6072217 | Burr | Jun 2000 | A |
6087210 | Sohn | Jul 2000 | A |
6087691 | Hamamoto | Jul 2000 | A |
6088518 | Hsu | Jul 2000 | A |
6091286 | Blauschild | Jul 2000 | A |
6096611 | Wu | Aug 2000 | A |
6103562 | Son et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6121153 | Kikkawa | Sep 2000 | A |
6147383 | Kuroda | Nov 2000 | A |
6153920 | Gossmann et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157073 | Lehongres | Dec 2000 | A |
6175582 | Naito et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184112 | Maszara et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190979 | Radens et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194259 | Nayak et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198157 | Ishida et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6218892 | Soumyanath et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218895 | De et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221724 | Yu et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229188 | Aoki et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232164 | Tsai et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235597 | Miles | May 2001 | B1 |
6245618 | An et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6268640 | Park et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271070 | Kotani et al. | Aug 2001 | B2 |
6271551 | Schmitz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288429 | Iwata et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297132 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6300177 | Sundaresan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313489 | Letavic et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319799 | Ouyang et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320222 | Forbes et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323525 | Noguchi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326666 | Bernstein et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335233 | Cho et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342790 | Ferguson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348806 | Okandan et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358806 | Puchner | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6380019 | Yu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391752 | Colinge et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6426260 | Hshieh | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426279 | Huster et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432754 | Assaderaghi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6444550 | Hao et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6444551 | Ku et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449749 | Stine | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456104 | Guarin et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461920 | Shirahata et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6461928 | Rodder | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6472278 | Marshall et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6482714 | Hieda et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489224 | Burr | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6492232 | Tang et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500739 | Wang et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6503801 | Rouse et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6503805 | Wang et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6506640 | Ishida et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518623 | Oda et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6521470 | Lin et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6534373 | Yu | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6541328 | Whang et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6541829 | Nishinohara et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6548842 | Bulucea et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551885 | Yu | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552377 | Yu | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6573129 | Hoke et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6576535 | Drobny et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6600200 | Lustig et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6620671 | Wang et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624488 | Kim | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6627473 | Oikawa et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6630710 | Augusto | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6660605 | Liu | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6662350 | Fried et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667200 | Sohn et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6670260 | Yu et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6693333 | Yu | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6730568 | Sohn | May 2004 | B2 |
6737724 | Hieda et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6743291 | Ang et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6743684 | Liu | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751519 | Satya et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6753230 | Sohn et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760900 | Rategh et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770944 | Nishinohara et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6787424 | Yu | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6797553 | Adkisson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6797602 | Kluth et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6797994 | Hoke et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6808004 | Kamm et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6808994 | Wang | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6813750 | Usami et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821825 | Todd et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821852 | Rhodes | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822297 | Nandakumar et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831292 | Currie et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6835639 | Rotondaro et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6852602 | Kanzawa et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6852603 | Chakravarthi et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6881641 | Wieczorek et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6881987 | Sohn | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891439 | Jaehne et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6893947 | Martinez et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6900519 | Cantell et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6901564 | Stine et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6916698 | Mocuta et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6917237 | Tschanz et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6927463 | Iwata et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6928128 | Sidiropoulos | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6930007 | Bu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6930360 | Yamauchi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6957163 | Ando | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6963090 | Passlack et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6995397 | Yamashita et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7002214 | Boyd et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7008836 | Algotsson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7013359 | Li | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7015546 | Herr et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7015741 | Tschanz et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022559 | Barnak et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7036098 | Eleyan et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7038258 | Liu et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7039881 | Regan | May 2006 | B2 |
7045456 | Murto et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7057216 | Ouyang et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7061058 | Chakravarthi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7064039 | Liu | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7064399 | Babcock et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7071103 | Chan et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7078325 | Curello et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7078776 | Nishinohara et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089513 | Bard et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7089515 | Hanafi et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7091093 | Noda et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7103861 | Ang et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7105399 | Dakshina-Murthy et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7109099 | Tan et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7119381 | Passlack | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7122411 | Mouli | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127687 | Signore | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7132323 | Haensch et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7161401 | Li | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169675 | Tan et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7170120 | Datta et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7176137 | Perng et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7186598 | Yamauchi et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7189627 | Wu et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7199430 | Babcock et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7202517 | Dixit et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7208354 | Bauer | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7211871 | Cho | May 2007 | B2 |
7221021 | Wu et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7223646 | Miyashita et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7226833 | White et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7226843 | Weber et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7230680 | Fujisawa et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235822 | Li | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7256639 | Koniaris et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7259428 | Inaba | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260562 | Czajkowski et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7294877 | Rueckes et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7297994 | Wieczorek et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301208 | Handa et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7304350 | Misaki | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7307471 | Gammie et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312500 | Miyashita et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7321254 | Li et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323754 | Ema et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7332439 | Lindert et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336088 | Rius Vazquez et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7348629 | Chu et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7354833 | Liaw | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7380225 | Joshi et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7398497 | Sato et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7402207 | Besser et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7402872 | Murthy et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7416605 | Zollner et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7427788 | Li et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7442971 | Wirbeleit et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7449733 | Inaba et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7462908 | Bol et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7469164 | Du-Nour | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7470593 | Rouh et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7485536 | Jin et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7487474 | Ciplickas et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7491988 | Tolchinsky et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7494861 | Chu et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496862 | Chang et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496867 | Turner et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7498637 | Yamaoka et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7501324 | Babcock et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7501880 | Bonaccio et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7503020 | Allen et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7504876 | Raghavan et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7507999 | Kusumoto et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7514766 | Yoshida | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7521323 | Surdeanu et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7531393 | Doyle et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7531836 | Liu et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7538364 | Twynam | May 2009 | B2 |
7538412 | Schulze et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7562233 | Sheng et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7564105 | Chi et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7566600 | Mouli | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7569456 | Ko et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7586322 | Xu et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7592241 | Takao | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7595243 | Bulucea et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7598142 | Ranade et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7605041 | Ema et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7605060 | Meunier-Beillard et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7605429 | Bernstein et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7608496 | Chu | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7615802 | Elpelt et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7622341 | Chudzik et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7638380 | Pearce | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7642140 | Bae et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7644377 | Saxe et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7645665 | Kubo et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7651920 | Siprak | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7655523 | Babcock et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7659772 | Nomura et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7673273 | Madurawae et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7675126 | Cho | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7675317 | Perisetty | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7678638 | Chu et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7681628 | Joshi et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7682887 | Dokumaci et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7683442 | Burr et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7696000 | Liu et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704822 | Jeong | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704844 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7709828 | Braithwaite et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7723750 | Zhu et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7737472 | Kondo et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7741138 | Cho | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7741200 | Cho et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7745270 | Shah et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7750374 | Capasso et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7750381 | Hokazono et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7750405 | Nowak | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7750682 | Bernstein et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7755144 | Li et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7755146 | Helm et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7759206 | Luo et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7759714 | Itoh et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761820 | Berger et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7795677 | Bangsaruntip et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7808045 | Kawahara et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7808410 | Kim et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7811873 | Mochizuki | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7811881 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7816936 | Ito | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7818702 | Mandelman et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7821066 | Lebby et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7829402 | Matocha et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7831873 | Trimberger et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7846822 | Seebauer et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7855118 | Hoentschel et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7859013 | Chen et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7859290 | Kim | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7863163 | Bauer | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7867835 | Lee et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7883977 | Babcock et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7888205 | Herner et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7888747 | Hokazono | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7895546 | Lahner et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7897495 | Ye et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7906413 | Cardone et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7906813 | Kato | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7910419 | Fenouillet-Beranger et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7919791 | Flynn et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7926018 | Moroz et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7935984 | Nakano | May 2011 | B2 |
7941776 | Majumder et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7945800 | Gomm et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7948008 | Liu et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7952147 | Ueno et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7960232 | King et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7960238 | Kohli et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7968400 | Cai | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7968411 | Williford | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7968440 | Seebauer | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7968459 | Bedell et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7989900 | Haensch et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7994573 | Pan | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8004024 | Furukawa et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8012827 | Yu et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8029620 | Kim et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8031252 | Segami et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8039332 | Bernard et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8046598 | Lee | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8048791 | Hargrove et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8048810 | Tsai et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8051340 | Cranford, Jr. et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8053340 | Colombeau et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8063466 | Kurita | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8067279 | Sadra et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8067280 | Wang et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8067302 | Li | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8067976 | Sumita | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8076719 | Zeng et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8097529 | Krull et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8103983 | Agarwal et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105891 | Yeh et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8106424 | Schruefer | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8106461 | Chen et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8106481 | Rao | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8110487 | Griebenow et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8114761 | Mandrekar et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8119482 | Bhalla et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8120069 | Hynecek | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8129246 | Babcock et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8129797 | Chen et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8134159 | Hokazono | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8143120 | Kerr et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8143124 | Challa et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8143678 | Kim et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8148774 | Mori et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8163619 | Yang et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8169002 | Chang et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8170857 | Joshi et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8171323 | Rakshani et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8173499 | Chung et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8173502 | Yan et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8176461 | Trimberger | May 2012 | B1 |
8178430 | Kim et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8179530 | Levy et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8183096 | Wirbeleit | May 2012 | B2 |
8183107 | Mathur et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8185865 | Gupta et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8187959 | Pawlak et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8188542 | Yoo et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8196545 | Kurosawa | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8201122 | Dewey, III et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8214190 | Joshi et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8217423 | Liu et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8217712 | Miyatake et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8225255 | Ouyang et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8227307 | Chen et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8236661 | Dennard et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8239803 | Kobayashi | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8247300 | Babcock et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8255843 | Chen et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8258026 | Bulucea | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8266567 | El Yahyaoui et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8286180 | Foo | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8288798 | Passlack | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8293606 | Madhavan et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8299562 | Li et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8324059 | Guo et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8354671 | Im et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
20010014495 | Yu | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020042184 | Nandakumar et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030006415 | Yokogawa et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030047763 | Hieda et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030122203 | Nishinohara et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030173626 | Burr | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030183856 | Wiecczorek et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030215992 | Sohn et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040075118 | Heinemann et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040075143 | Bae et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040084731 | Matsuda et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040087090 | Grudowski et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040126947 | Sohn | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040175893 | Vatus et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040180488 | Lee | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050106824 | Alberto et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050116282 | Pattanayak et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134394 | Liu | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050250289 | Babcock et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050280075 | Ema et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060022270 | Boyd et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060049464 | Rao | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068555 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068586 | Pain | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071278 | Takao | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060154428 | Dokumaci | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060197158 | Babcock et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060203581 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060220114 | Miyashita et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060223248 | Venugopal et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070040222 | Van Camp et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070117326 | Tan et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070158790 | Rao | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070212861 | Chidambarrao et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070238253 | Tucker | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080067589 | Ito et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080108208 | Arevalo et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080169493 | Lee et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080169516 | Chung | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080197439 | Goerlach et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080227250 | Ranade et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080237661 | Ranade et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080258198 | Bojarczuk et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272409 | Sonkusale et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090057746 | Sugll et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090108350 | Cai et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090134468 | Tsuchiya et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090224319 | Kohli | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090302388 | Cai et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090309140 | Khamankar et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090311837 | Kapoor | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090321849 | Miyamura et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100012988 | Yang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100038724 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100100856 | Mittal | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100148153 | Hudait et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149854 | Vora | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100187641 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100207182 | Paschal | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100270600 | Inukai et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110059588 | Kang | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110073961 | Dennard et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110074498 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110079860 | Verhulst | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110079861 | Shifren et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110095811 | Chi et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110147828 | Murthy et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110169082 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110175170 | Wang et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110180880 | Chudzik et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110193164 | Zhu | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110212590 | Wu et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110230039 | Mowry et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242921 | Tran et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110248352 | Shifren et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110294278 | Eguchi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309447 | Arghavani et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120021594 | Gurtej et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120034745 | Colombeau et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120056275 | Cai et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120065920 | Nagumo et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120108050 | Chen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120132998 | Kwon et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120138953 | Cai et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120146155 | Hoentschel et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120167025 | Gillespie et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120187491 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120190177 | Kim et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120223363 | Kronholz et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0274278 | Jul 1988 | EP |
0312237 | Apr 1989 | EP |
0531621 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0683515 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0889502 | Jan 1999 | EP |
1450394 | Aug 2004 | EP |
59193066 | Jan 1984 | JP |
4186774 | Mar 1992 | JP |
8288508 | Jan 1996 | JP |
8153873 | Jun 1996 | JP |
2004087671 | Mar 2004 | JP |
10-0794094 | Jul 2003 | KR |
2011062788 | May 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English Translation of JP 8153873 Submitted herewith. |
Abiko, H et al., “A Channel Engineering Combined with Channel Epitaxy Optimization and TED Suppression for 0.15 μm n-n Gate CMOS Technology”, 1995 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, 1995, pp. 23-24. |
Chau, R et al., “A 50nm Depleted-Substrate CMOS Transistor (DST)”, Electron Device Meeting 2001, IEDM Technical Digest, IEEE International, 2001, pp. 29.1.1-29.1.4. |
Ducroquet, F et al. “Fully Depleted Silicon-on-Insulator nMOSFETs with Tensile Strained High Carbon Content Si1-yCy Channel”, 2006, ECS 210th Meeting, Abstract 1033. |
Ernst, T et al., “Nanoscaled MOSFET Transistors on Strained Si, SiGe, Ge Layers: Some Integration and Electrical Properties Features”, 2006, ECS Trans. 2006, vol. 3, Issue 7, pp. 947-961. |
Goesele, U et al., Diffusion Engineering by Carbon in Silicon, 2000, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. vol. 610. |
Hokazono, A et al., “Steep Channel & Halo Profiles Utilizing Boron-Diffusion-Barrier Layers (Si:C) for 32 nm Node and Beyond”, 2008, 2008 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 112-113. |
Hokazono, A et al., “Steep Channel Profiles in n/pMOS Controlled by Boron-Doped Si:C Layers for Continual Bulk-CMOS Scaling”, 2009, IEDM09-676 Symposium, pp. 29.1.1-29.1.4. |
Holland, OW and Thomas, DK “A Method to Improve Activation of Implanted Dopants in SiC”, 2001, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. |
Kotaki, H., et al., “Novel Bulk Dynamic Threshold Voltage MOSFET (B-DTMOS) with Advanced Isolation (SITOS) and Gate to Shallow-Well Contact (SSS-C) Processes for Ultra Low Power Dual Gate CMOS”, 1996, IEDM 96, pp. 459-462. |
Lavéant, P. “Incorporation, Diffusion and Agglomeration of Carbon in Silicon”, 2002, Solid State Phenomena, vols. 82-84, pp. 189-194. |
Noda, K et al., “A 0.1-μm Delta-Doped MOSFET Fabricated with Post-Low-Energy Implanting Selective Epitaxy”, Apr. 1998, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 809-814. |
Ohguro, T et al., “An 0.18-μm CMOS for Mixed Digital and Analog Aplications with Zero-Volt-Vth Epitaxial-Channel MOSFET's”, Jul. 1999, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 46, No. 7, pp. 1378-1383. |
Pinacho, R et al., “Carbon in Silicon: Modeling of Diffusion and Clustering Mechanisms”, Aug. 2002, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 92, No. 3, pp. 1582-1588. |
Robertson, LS et al., “The Effect of Impurities on Diffusion and Activation of Ion Implanted Boron in Silicon”, 2000, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. vol. 610. |
Scholz, R et al., “Carbon-Induced Undersaturation of Silicon Self-Interstitials”, Jan. 1998, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72(2), pp. 200-202. |
Scholz, RF et al., “The Contribution of Vacancies to Carbon Out-Diffusion in Silicon”, Jan. 1999,Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 74, No. 3, pp. 392-394. |
Stolk, PA et al., “Physical Mechanisms of Transient Enhanced Dopant Diffusion in Ion-Implanted Silicon”, May 1997, J. Appl. Phys. 81(9), pp. 6031-6050. |
Thompson, S et al., “MOS Scaling: Transistor Challenges for the 21st Century”, 1998, Intel Technology Journal Q3′ 1998, pp. 1-19. |
Wann, C. et al., “Channel Profile Optimization and Device Design for Low-Power High-Performance Dynamic-Threshold MOSFET”, 1996, IEDM 96, pp. 113-116. |
Werner, P. et al., “Carbon Diffusion in Silicon”, Oct. 1998, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 73, No. 17, pp. 2465-2467. |
Yan, Ran-Hong et al., “Scaling the Si MOSFET: From Bulk to SOI to Bulk”, Jul. 1992, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 39, No. 7. |
Komaragiri, R. et al., “Depletion-Free Poly Gate Electrode Architecture for Sub 100 Nanometer CMOS Devices with High-K Gate Dielectrics”, IEEE IEDM Tech Dig., San Francisco CA, 833-836, Dec. 13-15, 2004. |
Samsudin, K et al., Integrating Intrinsic Parameter Fluctuation Description into BSIMSOI to Forecast sub-15 nm UTB SOI based 6T SRAM Operation, Solid-State Electronics (50), pp. 86-93. |
Wong, H et al., “Nanoscale CMOS”, Proceedings of the IEEE, Vo. 87, No. 4, pp. 537-570. |
Machine Translation of KR 10-0794094 Submitted herewith. |
Banerjee et al, “Compensating Non-Optical Effects using Electrically-Driven Optical Proximity Correction”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 7275, 2009. |
Cheng et al, “Extremely Thin SOI (ETSOI) CMOS with Record Low Variability for Low Power System-on-Chip Applications”, IEDM 2009, Dec. 2009. |
Cheng et al., “Fully Depleted Extremely Thin SOI Technology Fabricated by a Novel Integration Scheme Featuring Implant-Free, Zero-Silicon-Loss, and Faceted Raised Source/Drain”, 2009 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, 2009. |
Drennan et al., “Implications of Proximity Effects for Analog Design”, Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2006, CICC '06, IEEE, Sep. 10-13, 2006, pp. 169-176. |
Hook et al., “Lateral Ion Implant Straggle and Mask Proximity Effect”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 50, No. 9, Sep. 2003. |
Hori et al., “A 0.1 um CMOS with a Step Channel Profile Formed by Ultra High Vacuum CVD and In-Situ Doped Ions”, IEDM 1993, May 12, 1993. |
Matsuhashi et al., “High-Performance Double-Layer Epitaxial-Channel PMOSFET Compatible with a Single Gate CMOSFET”, 1996 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, 1996. |
Shao et al., “Boron diffusion in silicon: the anomalies and control by point defect engineering”, Materials Science and Engineering R 42 (2003), Nov. 2003, pp. 65-114. |
Sheu et al., “Modeling the Well-Edge Proximity Effect in Highly Scaled MOSFETs”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 53, No. 11, Nov. 2006, pp. 2792-2798. |
Chan et al., “DDRO: A Novel Performance Monitoring Methodology Based on Design-Dependent Ring Oscillators”, IEEE International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design, Mar. 9, 2012. |
Chen et al., “Fully On-Chip Temperature, Process, and Voltage Sensors”, IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 2010. |
Datta et al., “A 45.6u2 13.4uW 7.1V/V Resolution Sub-Threshold Based Digital Process-Sensing Circuit in 45nm CMOS”, GLSVLSI '11, Lausanne, Switzerland, May 2, 2011 to May 4, 2011. |
Ghosh et al., “On-Chip Negative Bias Temperature Instability Sensor Using Slew Rate Monitoring Circuitry”, IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, May 24, 2009 to May 27, 2009. |
Ghosh et al., “On-Chip Process Variation Detection and Compensation for Parametric Yield Enhancement in sub-100nm CMOS Technology”, IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, IBM Austin Center for Advanced Studies, 2007. |
Nan et al., “Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling for Power-Constrained Design using Process Voltage and Temperature Sensor Circuits”, Journal of Information Processing Systems, vol. 7, No. 1, Mar. 2011. |
Saxena et al., “Variation in Transistor Performance and Leakage in Nanometer-Scale Technologies”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 55, No. 1, Jan. 2008. |
Tschanz et al., “Adaptive Body Bias for Reducing Impacts of Die-to-Die and Within-Die Parameter Variations on Microprocessor Frequency and Leakage”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 37, No. 11, Nov. 2002. |
Zhang et al., “An On-Chip Characterizing System for Within-Die Delay Variation Measurement of Individual Standard Cells in 65-nm CMOS”, Design Automation Conference, Jan. 25, 2011 to Jan. 28, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13668063 | Nov 2012 | US |
Child | 14463399 | US |