The present inventions relate to safety razors and, more particularly, relate to razors for soft cut shaving and dry shaving.
Safety razor blades have had assemblies where a cutting blade is surrounded by flexible portions or guards within a construction assembly used to house the cutting blade and are generally flexible for the purposes of temporarily allowing a greater cutting blade exposure when force is manually applied and when force is withdrawn the cutting blade exhibits less exposure. The cutting blades within these prior safety razor blades are typically fastened rigidly in order to disallow the cutting blade to move in relation to the housing cartridge of the safety razor blade. We often see the housing or cartridge of the prior safety razors adjusting in order to contour to challenging surfaces while the blade is anchored in place for the purpose of remaining rigid. These characteristics prove beneficial in creating and allowing for a clean close shave cutting hairs as close as possible. Therefore, getting the cleanest and closest shave is often a primary competitive factor between shaving companies. In fact, in today's market we even see multiple rows of cutting blades rigidly in place in order to continue this trend. Because of the closeness these safety razors offer and because of the level of cutting blade exposure to one's skin we find that shaving cream is a necessary promoted lubricant in the shaving method in order to prevent cutting or bleeding. These safety razors were typically created for men who seek to shave their face as well as women who seek to shave their legs. Most prior art configurations illustrate flexible guards or a safety razor cartridge housing in order to safely contour a straight edge razor along the many curves that typically exist on a face of a man or legs of a woman while cutting hair as close as possible in order to promote the smoothest shave attainable.
Examples of safety blade prior art are exhibited herein. One example is illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 3,500,539 by Muros.
Another example of a prior art is U.S. Pat. No. 4,409,735 by Cartwright, wherein we see a shaving geometry that promotes a flexible cutting blade cartridge that offers more controlled flexibility when protruding a skin surface along the elongated side.
Yet another prior art is EP Patent 1,537,964 by Pennella et al., wherein we see a wet shaving geometry that incorporates guard elements. The guard elements are staggered alongside the sharp edge of the razor while perpendicular and bisecting each razor row.
Yet another prior art is U.S. Pat. No. 5,031,316 by Oldroyd wherein we see another illustration wherein a supporting member or guard surrounds the flexible cutting blade allowing a level of protection while the sharp edge of the cutting blade protrudes the skin surface.
Yet another prior art is U.S. Pat. No. 2,670,533 by Kearney, wherein we see another illustration that similar to the U.S. Pat. No. 3,500,539 by Muros wherein the cutting blade protrudes into a skin surface which in turn allows an overexposure of a rigid cutting blade.
Yet another prior art is U.S. Pat. No. 2,725,886 by Gagliano, wherein there is illustrated a comb or like structure used for cutting or trimming hair on one's head but the prior art does not have a supporting inner guard, pre-determined base, nor a void used to assist in creating the shaving geometry illustrated in embodiments of the present inventions.
Yet another prior art is U.S. Pat. No. 6,094,820 by Adachi, wherein there is illustrated a razor comb blade unit intended for cutting or trimming hair on one’. However, the cutting blade in this example is slidably held in the blade holder leaving no base, void or gap to allow a desired cutting blade flexibility as described in the embodiments of the present inventions.
Yet another prior art is U.S. Pat. No. 8,413,334 by Walker, wherein there is illustrated a more recent art form where we are presented again a purposely rigid cutting blade that is rigidly anchored into place in order to allow the safety blade housing or cartridge to alone provide a level of safety through the depth margin of slots or grooves between each tooth in the comb guard.
Thus, it is an object of the present inventions to provide a safety shaving razor blade that allows wet and dry shaving capabilities and the like.
It is still another object of the present inventions to minimize accidental cutting, nicking or razor burn from the sharp edge of the cutting blade which can often be negative results of shaving without applying shaving cream.
It is another object of the present inventions to provide such a razor blade that will eliminate the need to use a hair trimmer prior to shaving with a straight edge razor blade.
It is yet another object of the present inventions to provide such a razor blade that will cut hair at or slightly below a skin surface but not to the depth at which other safety razors provide. Thus, the shaving geometry eliminates the need of shaving cream in order to protect the skin surface from cutting or nicking.
It is still another object of the present inventions to provide such a razor blade that will allow an individual the choice to choose whether to dry shave without the application of water and/or shaving cream or to choose to apply shaving cream or shaving lubricant and/or water to one's back side during the shaving process such as in the shower.
It is still another object of the present inventions to allow certain individuals who may have extremely sensitive skin or even viruses such as MERSA the ability to shave certain areas without irritation the infected skin surface which when using an overly exposure cutting blade tends to irritate, flare up and spread a virus.
It is still another object of the present inventions to offer a quick and easy shave during situations where a medical emergency may occur. An example of this could be using embodiments of the present inventions in the effect that a medical team may need to shave an individual chest in order to apply defibrillator in order to control heart fibrillation when applying an electric current to the chest wall.
It is still another object of the present inventions to eliminate the user of batteries and moving parts which are all too often found when using electronic devices.
It is still another object of the present inventions to eliminate the use of a device that possess moving parts which tends to break down and cause returns when selling through distributors, wholesalers and retailers.
It is still another object of the present inventions to offer a device that maintains a handle of which can accept its replacement shaving blades as well as accepts a device used to lubricate one's back with a shaving cream or gel type of lubricant prior to shaving.
It is still another object of the present inventions to offer a device that can be folded into a smaller more compact size that would be easily stored in a convenient space such as on the wall of one's shower and such. Folding the device would also prove efficient when selling in retail stores in that it would save space which is very important to retailers.
It is still another object of the present inventions to offer a shaving device that would allow handicapped individuals access easily and effectively shave “hard-to-reach” areas such as their legs without the effort that is normally required when using a traditional straight edge shaver handle and razor blade.
It is still another object of the present inventions to create a razor blade that could act as a handle itself or adhere to a handle that could be used for any part of the body.
It is still another object of the present inventions to create a razor that could prove beneficial for prepping during medical surgery or in an emergency matter time is crucial and shaving must be performed rapidly.
It is still another object of the present inventions to create a razor that could prove beneficial for use in rehabilitation centers such as prisons or detention centers where safety is important.
There is a need for a safety razor blade with outer teeth, outer teeth edge, deep void, inner guard, inner guard edge and an integrated cutting blade whereby deep void is intermediate of cutting blade and outer teeth.
The present inventions are illustrated by way of example and are not limited by the accompanying figures, in which like references indicate similar elements. Elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale.
The details of the preferred embodiments and these and other objects and features of the inventions will be more readily understood from the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
In the first embodiment the sharp edge 120 of the cutting blade 110 does not protrude the skin planar surface A. As will be seem in each of the first through the fourth embodiments, the sharp edge 120 of the cutting blade 110 does not protrude the skin planar surface A. A cutting blade 110 made of stainless steel extends along a path intermediate of a deep void 160 and inner guard 130. It should be known the preferred cutting blade 110 exposure is less than about 0.030 inches (about 0.0762 centimeter). A strong opposing force of at least 10 pounds (4.536 kilograms (10 pounds)) may be applied while protecting and minimizing cutting or nicking on a skin surface when the apparatus engages.
A sharp edge 120 opposite of cutting blade end 220 is dependent on shaving blade geometry in order to produce greater or lesser friction. One characteristic in creating a lesser friction between sharp edge 120 of cutting blade 110 and a skin surface contour A is presented in this invention wherein a sharp edge 120 of a cutting blade 110 is prohibited from protruding said skin surface contour A. In the efforts to promote less friction, the level of distance between the base 200 and the sharp edge 120 of the cutting blade 110 will be substantial. Flexibility of cutting blade 110 is dependent upon the distance exhibited between a base 200 and sharp edge 120 wherein the greater the margin of distance the more flexibility is exhibited which results in less friction between sharp edge 120 and skin surface when opposing force is applied. An extremely decreased level of friction by an extremely flexible cutting blade 110 wherein said sharp edge 120 of cutting blade 110 does not protrude flat plane of a skin surface contour A and allows for a shave where lubricant is not a recommended application. The less the level of distance between base 200 and sharp edge 120 the more rigid and less flexible the cutting blade 110. Thus, a more rigid cutting blade 110 would be the result of an increased level of friction between sharp edge 120 of a cutting blade 110 and a skin surface.
An inner guard 130 is a supporting member mounted adjacent of said cutting blade 110 where, within said shaving geometry, inner guard 130 embodies an inner guard edge 180 which with an inside edge 190 of outer teeth tips 150 together create skin surface contour A. Inner guard edge 180 may have teeth wherein teeth possess a web covering in order to hide shorn hairs as will later be further disused and illustrated in
An outer comb 140 having elongated side 210 a row of outer teeth tips 150 and allowing shorn hair to exit the safety razor rearward of outer teeth inside edge 190 as illustrated in
A deep void 160 is spaced intermediately of outer teeth tips 150 and cutting blade 110. Deep void 160 in a preferred embodiment having a preferred thickness “K” of 0.014 inches (0.03556 centimeter) or less in order to control over-exposure and over flexibility of said cutting blade 110. The thickness K as described is can be measured between inner side of comb and inner side of the cutting blade 110. The deep void 160 level of thickness limits the level of flexibility of the cutting blade 110 and plays an important role in the preferred level of friction displayed between the sharp edge 120 of a cutting blade 110 and a the skin surface contours in
The skin surface contour A is flat when not pressed by the safety razor 100. When the safety razor 100 is pressed against the skin surface contour A during shaving, the skin surface contours B or C result as illustrated in
The skin surface contours B or C have a convex skin surface contour between a pair of skin indents respectively created between both the outer comb 140 and the inner guard 130. When both the inside edge 190 of the outer comb 140 and the inner guard edge 180 of the inner guard 130 press into the skin, the recessed sharp edge 120 moves relatively closer towards the skin surface contour B or C of the skin when cutting the hair.
The outer comb 140 and the inner guard 130 simultaneously touch the skin surface during shaving and can also firmly press respective indents into the skin surface during shaving. Thus the convex contour between a pair of skin indents is respectively created between both the outer comb 140 and the inner guard 130 pressing into the skin surface. Because the present inventions are suitable for dry shaving, without a shaving cream or surface lubricant, the inner guard 130 can firmly press against the skin surface and there is no concern about shaving cream or skin lubricant removal by scraping from the skin surface before the skin surface and hair hit the sharp edge 120 of the cutting blade 110.
Letter designations in the drawings depict certain planes, gap distances and contours, defined throughout, and for convenience are summarily defined wherein:
The safety razor 100 removes hair from skin using the cutting blade 110 comprising a sharp edge 120 along an elongated side 210 of a planar surface. An outer comb 140 has a row of outer teeth 140 running along the planar surface on an outside of the cutting blade 110, each of the outer teeth of the outer comb 140 is substantially perpendicular to the sharp edge 120 and spaced with a deep void 160 between the row of the outer comb 140 and the planar surface of the cutting blade 110, wherein ends of the outer comb 140 comprise outer teeth tips 150. An inner guard 130 runs along the planar surface on an inside of the cutting blade 110. The sharp edge 120 of cutting blade 110 is recessed up to a skin surface contour A. The skin surface contour defined from the inside edges 190 of outer teeth tips 150 to the inner guard edge 180. When cutting blade 110 is flexing said cutting blade 110 longitudinally bends in a curved-like arc while sharp edge 120 of cutting blade 110 causing further recess D relative to the skin surface contour A. The sharp edge of the cutting blade can longitudinally bend to cause further recess relative to the skin surface contour. The cutting blade 110 is fixedly anchored on the cutting blade end 220 opposite the sharp edge 120.
The inner guard 130 may comprise an inner comb comprising a row of inner teeth running along the elongated side of an inside of the cutting blade 110, each of the inner teeth substantially perpendicular to the sharp edge 120.
A user for hair removal moves the safety razor 100 across skin such that the outer comb 140 extends over the cutting blade 110 to contact the hair before the hair comes in contact with the sharp edge 120. Prior to the shaving operation or flexing of the cutting blade 110 the inner guard 130 can have substantially no void between the cutting blade 110 and inner guard 130. When the safety razor 100 moves across the skin, the hair first passes through the outer comb 140 and then second the sharp edge 120 of the cutting blade 110 bends in a direction towards the outer comb 140 against a skin surface contour shortening the width of the gap G between the sharp edge 120 of the cutting blade 110 and the row of outer teeth of the outer comb 140 in
The safety razor 100 is moved across skin such that an outer comb 140 extends over the cutting blade 110 to contact hair before the hair comes in contact with a sharp edge 120. When moving the safety razor 100 across skin, the hair first passes through the outer teeth of the outer comb 140 and second then the sharp edge 120 of the cutting blade 110 bends in a direction to shorten the width of the gap G between the sharp edge 120 of the cutting blade 110 and the row of outer teeth of the outer comb 140 and the hair is cut by the sharp edge 120.
A deep void 160 exists between the planar surface of the cutting blade 110 and the outer comb 140 in the first and second and third and fourth embodiments of respective
An opening G between the sharp edge 120 of cutting blade 110 and inside edges 190 of the outer teeth tips 150 of the outer comb 140 has a dimension G the same or less than a dimension J of an opening J between the sharp edge 120 of cutting blade 110 and an inner guard edge 180 of the inner guard 130. A dimension of the deep void 160 has a depth extending from the outer teeth tips 150 to a base 200 of the outer comb 140 substantially greater than a dimension G of the gap G. A dimension of the gap G is chosen in connection with the preferred distance of a base 200 from the sharp edge 120 of a cutting blade 110. It should be noted that the closer the base 200 is in distance to the sharp edge 120 of a cutting blade 110 the smaller the gap G becomes. The further away the base 200 is in distance to the sharp edge 120 of the cutting blade 110, the larger the gap G may become.
A problem with prior safety razors is that while they do offer a level of protection when contouring within the shaving process, it is widely known that in order to attain such a close shave that they still do require and create a cutting blade flexibility and exposure that is far too rigid to create a controlled atmosphere that would allow one to dry shave a hard-to-reach area such as one's back without application of shaving cream. More often in order to create a safety razor that navigates angles and bumps we see the safety razor 100 housing or “cartridge” being altered while the cutting blade 110 remains rigid. The strong friction is often illustrated in today's market between the sharp edge 120 of the cutting blade 110 and a skin surface which is why the application of shaving cream or shaving gel prior to shaving is recommended in order to minimize the cutting or nicking of the skin surface. The prior safety razors do not allow a controlled shaving geometry that minimizes cutting blade 110 exposure while offering a level of flexibility take place without the use of shaving cream or gel in order to greatly minimize cutting or bleeding. One common factor amongst the majority of safety razors is that the cutting blade, although engaging by guards that may assist in deflection when engaging a skin surface, often embody a cutting blade that is capable of protruding a skin surface contour A that is formed between an inner guard edge 180 and the inside edge 190 of the outer teeth tips 150. Another important missing characteristic of the prior art is that there does not exist an opening G between the sharp edge 120 of cutting blade 110 and an inside edge 190 that remains the same level of distance or less than an opening represented by J which exists between the sharp edge 120 of cutting blade 110 and an inner guard edge 180 of the inner guard 130. A final important notation is that a cutting blade 110 that is most commonly found within razors today do not embody a preferred level of distance between a sharp edge 120 and a base 200 that would allow for a proper amount of cutting blade 110 flexibility which creates an extremely light or soft level of friction between sharp edge 120 of a cutting blade 110 and a skin surface.
Furthermore, in embodiments of the present inventions there is a deep void 160 that is specified in
In an additional embodiment of the safety razor 100, an inner rearward distance F from a vertical plane of the sharp edge 120 of the flexible cutting blade 110 to a vertical plane of the to the inner guard edge of the inner guard 130 in relation to an outer rearward distance N from a vertical plane of the inside edge 190 of the outer comb 140 to a vertical plane of the sharp edge 120 of the flexible cutting blade 110 has a ratio of about 1. In other words, in this embodiment, the inner rearward distance F and the outer rearward distance N are substantially the same. The inner rearward distance F from the vertical plane of the sharp edge 120 of the flexible cutting blade 110 to the vertical plane of the inner guard edge of the inner guard 130 is about 0.508 mm to about 1.016 mm A preferred inner rearward distance F from the vertical plane of the sharp edge 120 of the flexible cutting blade 110 to the vertical plane of the inner guard 130 is about 0.762 mm. Also, the outer rearward distance N from the vertical plane of the inside edge 190 of the outer comb 140 to the vertical plane of the sharp edge 120 of the flexible cutting blade 110 is about 0.508 mm to about 1.016 mm A preferred outer rearward distance N from the vertical plane of the inside edge 190 to the vertical plane of the sharp edge 120 is about 0.762 mm. In this discussion of an additional embodiment, the diagonal distance E, diagonal distance J, and diagonal distance G are also effected and have alternate dimensions as well. Diagonal distance E may be about 1.54 mm to about 2.54 mm A preferred diagonal distance E is about 2.3622 mm Diagonal distance J may be about 0.762 mm to 1.6 mm A preferred distance J is about 1.4986 mm Diagonal distance G may be about 0.254 mm to about 0.889 mm A preferred diagonal distance G is about 0.8636 mm. Furthermore, the inner guard 180 having an inside end 360 and an outer edge 180 wherein the distance between the inside end 360 and the outer edge 180 is considered the inner guard 130 inside wall 370. The inside wall 370 distance is referenced as distance M. Distance M is about 0.381 mm to about 0.889 mm A preferred distance M is about 0.61 mm. The distance M is the same or greater than a thickness “K” of a deep void 160. It is important to note that diagonal distance J is substantially equal or greater than distance G. It is important to note that the skin convex enters and stretches inside of the outer edge 180 and inside edge 190 it is preferable to have a greater diagonal distance J in comparison to diagonal distance G. Having a greater diagonal distance J allows the stretching skin convex to press against the cutting blade 110 and bending the cutting blade 110 towards the inside of the outer comb 140. If diagonal distance J was less than diagonal distance G the skin convex will have a harder time pressing the cutting blade 110 towards the inside of the outer comb 140 and the cutting blade 110 becomes more likely to poke into the skin as a dagger instead of at an cutting angle between the sharp edge 120 of the cutting blade 110 and the skin surface.
In an additional embodiment of the safety razor 100, an inner distance BB from a vertical plane of the sharp edge 120 of the flexible cutting blade 110 to a vertical plane of the to the inner guard edge of the inner guard 130 in relation to an outer distance N from a vertical plane of the inside edge 190 of the outer comb 140 to a vertical plane of the sharp edge 120 of the flexible cutting blade 110 has a ratio of about 1. In other words, in this embodiment, the inner distance BB and the outer distance N are substantially the same. The inner distance BB from the vertical plane of the sharp edge 120 of the flexible cutting blade 110 to the vertical plane of the inner guard edge of the inner guard 130 is about 0.508 mm to about 1.016 mm. A preferred inner distance BB from the vertical plane of the sharp edge 120 of the flexible cutting blade 110 to the vertical plane of the inner guard 130 is about 0.762 mm. Also, the outer distance N from the vertical plane of the inside edge 190 of the outer comb 140 to the vertical plane of the sharp edge 120 of the flexible cutting blade 110 is about 0.508 mm to about 1.016 mm. A preferred outer distance N from the vertical plane of the inside edge 190 to the vertical plane of the sharp edge 120 is about 0.762 mm. In this discussion of an additional embodiment, the diagonal distance E, diagonal distance J, and diagonal distance G are also effected and have alternate dimensions as well. Diagonal distance E may be about 1.54 mm to about 2.54 mm. A preferred diagonal distance E is about 2.3622 mm. Diagonal distance J may be about 0.762 mm to 1.6 mm. A preferred distance J is about 1.4986 mm. Diagonal distance G may be about 0.254 mm to about 0.889 mm. A preferred diagonal distance G is about 0.8636 mm. Furthermore, the inner guard 180 having an inside end 360 and an outer edge 180 wherein the distance between the inside end 360 and the outer edge 180 is considered the inner guard 130 inside wall 370. The inside wall 370 distance is referenced as distance M. Distance M is about 0.381 mm to about 0.889 mm. A preferred distance M is about 0.61 mm. The distance M is the same or greater than a thickness “K” of a deep void 160. It is important to note that diagonal distance J is substantially equal or greater than distance G. It is important to note that the skin convex enters and stretches inside of the outer edge 180 and inside edge 190 it is preferable to have a greater diagonal distance J in comparison to diagonal distance G. Having a greater diagonal distance J allows the stretching skin convex to press against the cutting blade 110 and bending the cutting blade 110 towards the inside of the outer comb 140. If diagonal distance J was less than diagonal distance G the skin convex will have a harder time pressing the cutting blade 110 towards the inside of the outer comb 140 and the cutting blade 110 becomes more likely to poke into the skin as a dagger instead of at an cutting angle between the sharp edge 120 of the cutting blade 110 and the skin surface.
The inner edge of the inner guard 130 and the inside edge 190 of the outer comb 140 in practice are blunt or curved edges because no corner is perfectly sharp or square. If the inner edge of the inner guard 130 and the inside edge 190 of the outer comb 140 were perfectly sharp or square, they would risk cutting into the skin or feel uncomfortable. That being said, there may be a slightly square edge sufficient to indent and grip the skin in order for the skin inside of the inside edge 190 and the inner guard 130 to stretch. These ends are the outermost horizontal dimension to the end or tip of the inner guard 130 or the outer comb 140. Therefore the inner distance BB and outer distance N are stated measured from respective ends of the inner guard 130 and the outer comb 140. The trailing opening J takes a shape of an imaginary triangle. The imaginary triangle has three sides. The first side runs between the outer edge 180 and the plane of the cutting blade 110. The second side runs from where the inner guard 130 and the plane of the cutting blade 110 meet. The third and final side is where the flat skin plane A is inside of the sharp edge 120 and the outer edge 180. In other alternate embodiments the imaginary triangle may be a right triangle or an isosceles triangle or an isosceles right triangle. The trailing opening J cross sectional has three triangular corners or vertices which have three walls but it is not a perfect triangle being that the three walls or sides of the vertices are not always flat.
In an additional embodiment of the safety razor 100, an inner distance BB from a vertical plane of the sharp edge 120 of the flexible cutting blade 110 to a vertical plane of the inner guard edge of the inner guard 130 in relation to an outer distance N from a vertical plane of the inside edge 190 of the outer comb 140 to a vertical plane of the sharp edge 120 of the flexible cutting blade 110 has a ratio of about 1. In other words, in this embodiment, the inner distance BB and the outer distance N are substantially the same. The inner distance BB from the vertical plane of the sharp edge 120 of the flexible cutting blade 110 to the vertical plane of the inner guard edge of the inner guard 130 is about 0.508 mm to about 1.016 mm. A preferred inner distance BB from the vertical plane of the sharp edge 120 of the flexible cutting blade 110 to the vertical plane of the inner guard 130 is about 0.762 mm. Also, the outer distance N from the vertical plane of the inside edge 190 of the outer comb 140 to the vertical plane of the sharp edge 120 of the flexible cutting blade 110 is about 0.508 mm to about 1.016 mm. A preferred outer distance N from the vertical plane of the inside edge 190 to the vertical plane of the sharp edge 120 is about 0.762 mm. In this discussion of an additional embodiment the diagonal distance E, diagonal distance J, and diagonal distance G are also effected and have alternate dimensions as well. Diagonal distance E may be about 1.54 mm to about 2.54 mm. A preferred diagonal distance E is about 2.3622 mm. Diagonal distance J may be about 0.762 mm to 1.6 mm. A preferred distance J is about 1.4986 mm. Diagonal distance G may be about 0.254 mm to about 0.889 mm. A preferred diagonal distance G is about 0.8636 mm. Furthermore, the inner guard 180 having an inside end 360 and an outer edge 180 wherein the distance between the inside end 360 and the outer edge 180 is considered the inner guard 130 inside wall 370. The inside wall 370 distance is referenced as distance M. Distance M is about 0.381 mm to about 0.889 mm. A preferred distance M is about 0.61 mm. The distance M is the same or greater than a thickness “K” of a deep void 160. It is important to note that diagonal distance J is substantially equal or greater than distance G. It is important to note that the skin convex enters and stretches inside of the outer edge 180 and inside edge 190 it is preferable to have a greater diagonal distance J in comparison to diagonal distance G. Having a greater diagonal distance J allows the stretching skin convex to press against the cutting blade 110 and bending the cutting blade 110 towards the inside of the outer comb 140. If diagonal distance J was less than diagonal distance G the skin convex will have a harder time pressing the cutting blade 110 towards the inside of the outer comb 140 and the cutting blade 110 becomes more likely to poke into the skin as a dagger instead of at an cutting angle between the sharp edge 120 of the cutting blade 110 and the skin surface.
The inner edge of the inner guard 130 and the inside edge 190 of the outer comb 140 in practice are blunt or curved edges because no corner is perfectly sharp or square. If the inner edge of the inner guard 130 and the inside edge 190 of the outer comb 140 were perfectly sharp or square, they would risk cutting into the skin or feel uncomfortable. That being said, there may be a slightly square edge sufficient to indent and grip the skin in order for the skin inside of the inside edge 190 and the inner guard 130 to stretch. These ends are the outermost horizontal dimension to the end or tip of the inner guard 130 or the outer comb 140. Therefore the inner distance BB and outer distance N are stated measured from respective ends of the inner guard 130 and the outer comb 140.
The trailing opening J takes a shape of an imaginary triangle. The imaginary triangle has three sides. The first side runs between the outer edge 180 and the plane of the cutting blade 110. The second side runs from where the inner guard 130 and the plane of the cutting blade 110 meet. The third and final side is where the flat skin plane A is inside of the sharp edge 120 and the outer edge 180. In other alternate embodiments the imaginary triangle may be a right triangle or an isosceles triangle or an isosceles right triangle. The trailing opening J cross sectional has three triangular corners or vertices which have three walls but it is not a perfect triangle being that the three walls or sides of the vertices are not always flat.
A
As previously indicated,
The cutting blade 110 is at an angle nearly parallel to both the outer comb 140 and the inner guard 130 in embodiments. The cutting blade 110 of embodiments longitudinally bends in a direction of uncut hairs when the safety razor 100 is moved across the skin surface. The sharp edge of the cutting blade can longitudinally bend to cause further recess relative to the skin surface contour. This bend is in a direction less perpendicular to the skin surface. In embodiments of the present inventions, the cutting blade 110 in the safety razor 100 performs less rigidly against the skin surface and hair than in most prior razors. The deeper the void, the more the blade is cantilevered and the less rigid is its flexibility. Alternately, with a springier cutting blade 110 material or an inner spring, the blade has more flexibility. Such contributes to enhanced performance on dry conditions knowing that the closest save is not a highest priority on certain skin such as self-shaving the skin surface of ones back with a long handle 280 and no mirror.
A user of the safety razor 100 of embodiments can adjust how far the sharp edge 120 digs into the user's skin by varying the pressure of the safety razor 100 thereby adjusting how far the cutting blade 110 longitudinally bends. This may in some embodiments adjust the relative blade recess depth from the skin. These embodiments can be one mechanism for a user who feels adverse cutting feedback to adjust the blade recess by altering the pressure during the movement stroke. In other embodiments the cutting blade may be configured so altering speed or intensity of the movement stroke adjusts the blade recess.
The term “flexible”, as described previously in the first and second embodiment, is intended to describe the amount of bending or curved margin D the cutting blade 110 is granted in response to normal human opposing shaving forces. The “flexibility” of the cutting blade 110 in the first embodiment of
A low friction between sharp edge 120 and a skin surface is illustrated in the first through the fourth embodiments illustrated in
It is important to note in embodiments of the present inventions preferred cutting axis is a cutting axis between 20-50 degrees. An axis outside of 20-50 degrees, though may be accomplished, proves difficult when accessing petite skin surface areas whereby the risk of cutting or razor burn is greatly increased.
In further contrast to prior art the current invention does not require the razor blades to be exposed to water or shaving cream in order to offer a clean and close shave or to protect from cutting, nicking or skin irritation. This is a very important factor of the present inventions since application of shaving cream or lubricant can be extremely time consuming especially when applying to one's back side. Thus, not requiring the shaving cream lubricant is very time efficient. Furthermore, because the cutting blade 110 may be made from stainless steel the invention allows the safety razor 100 to last longer without any rusting since water and shaving cream, which will cause erosion or rust, is not necessary.
The preferred distance of separation between the inner guard edge 180 and the sharp edge 120 is a preferable margin of about 0.030 inches (about 0.0762 centimeter). The preferred distance of separation between the sharp edge 120 and the outer comb 140 inside edge 190 is about 0.032 inches (about 0.08128 centimeter). The preferred thickness of inner guard 130 is about 0.024 inches (about 0.06096 centimeter) or less. The preferred thickness of outer teeth tips 150 is about 0.026 inches (about 0.06604 centimeter) or less. The preferred cutting blade 110 exposure is about 0.030 inches (about 0.0762 centimeter) or less. Although the shaving geometry can be accomplished outside of these measurements these are preferred.
Although the invention is described herein with reference to specific embodiments, various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present inventions as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present inventions. They can have different configurations than the examples illustrated in the drawings. Any benefits, advantages, or solutions to problems that are described herein with regard to specific embodiments are not intended to be construed as a critical, required, or essential feature or element of any or all the claims.
Any letter designations such as (a) or (b) etc. used to label steps of any of the method claims herein are step headers applied for reading convenience and are not to be used in interpreting an order or process sequence of claimed method steps. Any method claims that recite a particular order or process sequence will do so using the words of their text, not the letter designations.
Unless stated otherwise, terms such as “first” and “second” are used to arbitrarily distinguish between the elements such terms describe. Thus, these terms are not necessarily intended to indicate temporal or other prioritization of such elements.
The instant patent application is a Continuation-in-part (CIP) of U.S. Pat. No. 9,718,200 first filed as U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/170,269 on Jan. 31, 2014 by the same inventor.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
65130 | Spblman | May 1867 | A |
775134 | Gillette | Nov 1904 | A |
913005 | Lancellotte | Feb 1909 | A |
974083 | Likewise | Oct 1910 | A |
991147 | Gillette | May 1911 | A |
1047617 | Cress | Dec 1912 | A |
1060245 | Gaisman | Apr 1913 | A |
1111721 | Gillette | Sep 1914 | A |
1158480 | Gillette | Nov 1915 | A |
1158481 | Gillette | Nov 1915 | A |
1288522 | Cowan | Dec 1918 | A |
1383516 | Benton | Jul 1921 | A |
1386353 | Norton | Aug 1921 | A |
D59243 | MacLagan | Oct 1921 | S |
1419187 | Wilson | Jun 1922 | A |
1477689 | Burns | Dec 1923 | A |
1572154 | McConoughey | Feb 1926 | A |
1749051 | Watt | Mar 1930 | A |
1789234 | Keenan | Jan 1931 | A |
1876570 | Cesario | Sep 1932 | A |
1899414 | Gray | Feb 1933 | A |
1976987 | Gardner | Oct 1934 | A |
2108267 | O'Neil | Feb 1938 | A |
2151265 | Clausen | Mar 1939 | A |
2165391 | Lewis | Jul 1939 | A |
2168447 | Patterson | Aug 1939 | A |
2171880 | Lewis | Sep 1939 | A |
2198531 | Fulenwider | Apr 1940 | A |
D123180 | Pileggi | Oct 1940 | S |
D124684 | Werner | Jan 1941 | S |
2229971 | Hammering | Jan 1941 | A |
2234440 | Lewis | Mar 1941 | A |
2237676 | Lewis | Apr 1941 | A |
2325868 | Morrow | May 1941 | A |
2252628 | Grachan | Aug 1941 | A |
2256326 | Quinio | Sep 1941 | A |
2270388 | Stampleman | Jan 1942 | A |
2288299 | Pileggi | Jun 1942 | A |
2363894 | Muros | Nov 1944 | A |
2370815 | Ross | Mar 1945 | A |
D150189 | Zurlinden | Jul 1948 | S |
D154784 | Lazar | Aug 1949 | S |
2488436 | Santoro, Sr. | Nov 1949 | A |
D157063 | Mansfield | Jan 1950 | S |
D157064 | Mansfield | Jan 1950 | S |
D159994 | Lee | Sep 1950 | S |
D161784 | Palmer | Jan 1951 | S |
2536485 | Behr | Jan 1951 | A |
2568368 | Sayer et al. | Sep 1951 | A |
2580058 | Willhelm | Dec 1951 | A |
2587964 | Burns | Mar 1952 | A |
RE23505 | Davis | May 1952 | E |
2615243 | Brown | Oct 1952 | A |
2615244 | Mansfield | Oct 1952 | A |
D169147 | Lamb | Mar 1953 | S |
2633635 | North | Apr 1953 | A |
2641055 | Mansfield | Jun 1953 | A |
2661529 | Infantino | Dec 1953 | A |
2663930 | Di Zazzo | Dec 1953 | A |
2670533 | Kearney | Mar 1954 | A |
2703449 | Haynes | Mar 1955 | A |
2725886 | Gagliano | Dec 1955 | A |
2746144 | Spanel | May 1956 | A |
2766521 | Benvenuti | Oct 1956 | A |
2810953 | Brody | Oct 1957 | A |
2814865 | Sunich | Dec 1957 | A |
2834357 | Gould | May 1958 | A |
2840901 | Narizzano | Jul 1958 | A |
2858835 | Parziale | Nov 1958 | A |
2866984 | Plough | Jan 1959 | A |
2869229 | Hightower | Jan 1959 | A |
2896320 | Caplan | Jul 1959 | A |
2900718 | Bailey | Aug 1959 | A |
2952907 | Miller | Sep 1960 | A |
2959853 | Mercer | Nov 1960 | A |
2967354 | Ahlborn | Jan 1961 | A |
2972187 | Gore | Feb 1961 | A |
D190580 | Christensen | Jun 1961 | S |
3041721 | Quinio, Sr. | Jul 1962 | A |
3054180 | Gore | Sep 1962 | A |
3084430 | Pacitti | Apr 1963 | A |
D195954 | Chrislcnscn | Aug 1963 | S |
3106020 | Tape | Oct 1963 | A |
D197588 | Macon | Feb 1964 | S |
3138865 | Meyer | Jun 1964 | A |
3238616 | Eweson | Mar 1966 | A |
3259978 | Weichselbaum | Jul 1966 | A |
D205453 | Christensen | Aug 1966 | S |
D208619 | Baker | Sep 1967 | S |
3358367 | Bartley | Dec 1967 | A |
3384960 | Solomon | May 1968 | A |
D211443 | Tin | Jun 1968 | S |
3402467 | Manahan | Sep 1968 | A |
3413720 | Mullen | Dec 1968 | A |
3421213 | Pawlikowski | Jan 1969 | A |
3500539 | Muros | Mar 1970 | A |
3536080 | Player | Oct 1970 | A |
D219501 | Trevor | Dec 1970 | S |
3570121 | Graceffo | Mar 1971 | A |
3571927 | Stone | Mar 1971 | A |
3599327 | Calandra | Aug 1971 | A |
3644992 | Bennett et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3646672 | Braginetz | Mar 1972 | A |
3675323 | Braginetz | Jul 1972 | A |
3768161 | Miller | Oct 1973 | A |
3805381 | Broussard | Apr 1974 | A |
3816912 | Glaberson | Jun 1974 | A |
3816913 | Ferraro | Jun 1974 | A |
D232874 | Koblick | Sep 1974 | S |
3834017 | Tolmie | Sep 1974 | A |
D235696 | Krupski | Jul 1975 | S |
3895437 | DiBuono | Jul 1975 | A |
3969817 | DiBuono | Jul 1976 | A |
3986258 | Liedtke | Oct 1976 | A |
4009517 | Horn | Mar 1977 | A |
4011656 | Liedtke | Mar 1977 | A |
4020549 | Edwards | May 1977 | A |
4026016 | Nissen | May 1977 | A |
4069580 | Cartwright et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4074429 | Roberts | Feb 1978 | A |
4094066 | Daniel, Jr. | Jun 1978 | A |
4163316 | Hagmann et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4198746 | Trotta | Apr 1980 | A |
D259743 | Hollinger | Jun 1981 | S |
4281456 | Douglass et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
RE30913 | Cartwright et al. | Apr 1982 | E |
4335509 | Smith | Jun 1982 | A |
4344226 | Blake | Aug 1982 | A |
4346721 | Molaro | Aug 1982 | A |
4378633 | Jacobson | Apr 1983 | A |
4401129 | Laque | Aug 1983 | A |
4409735 | Cartwright et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4441252 | Caves | Apr 1984 | A |
4446619 | Jacobson | May 1984 | A |
4461078 | Carreker | Jul 1984 | A |
4501066 | Sceberras | Feb 1985 | A |
4512077 | Tanabe et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4562644 | Hitchens | Jan 1986 | A |
4599793 | Iten | Jul 1986 | A |
4663841 | Custer | May 1987 | A |
4692986 | Motta | Sep 1987 | A |
4709475 | Phung | Dec 1987 | A |
4712300 | Hemmeter | Dec 1987 | A |
4741103 | Hultman | May 1988 | A |
4768528 | Steele | Sep 1988 | A |
4831731 | Elits | May 1989 | A |
4850107 | Valliades | Jul 1989 | A |
4893641 | Strickland | Jan 1990 | A |
4912846 | Yu | Apr 1990 | A |
4905372 | Willis | May 1990 | A |
4928716 | Greene | May 1990 | A |
4955136 | Diaz-Rivera | Sep 1990 | A |
D312144 | Buba | Nov 1990 | S |
D314247 | Amit | Jan 1991 | S |
5009003 | Grange | Apr 1991 | A |
5010645 | Furukawa | Apr 1991 | A |
5031316 | Oldroyd | Jul 1991 | A |
5031319 | Althaus | Jul 1991 | A |
5129157 | Wood | Jul 1992 | A |
5167069 | Quinn | Dec 1992 | A |
5220728 | Ueno et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5236439 | Kozikowski | Aug 1993 | A |
5343622 | Andrews | Sep 1994 | A |
5351356 | Townsend | Oct 1994 | A |
D352568 | Meisner | Nov 1994 | S |
D353941 | O'Hearn | Jan 1995 | S |
D354626 | Hurwitz | Jan 1995 | S |
D355049 | Yasui | Jan 1995 | S |
5386750 | Morrison | Feb 1995 | A |
5388332 | Oldroyd | Feb 1995 | A |
5410810 | Gillibrand | May 1995 | A |
5426853 | McNinch | Jun 1995 | A |
D364939 | Scott | Dec 1995 | S |
5522137 | Andrews | Jun 1996 | A |
5524346 | Backhaus | Jun 1996 | A |
5526568 | Copelan | Jun 1996 | A |
5560746 | Willow | Oct 1996 | A |
5643403 | Poole | Jul 1997 | A |
5673711 | Andrews | Oct 1997 | A |
5704127 | Cordio | Jan 1998 | A |
D391021 | van Oene | Feb 1998 | S |
5771589 | Kim | Jun 1998 | A |
5771591 | Armbruster | Jun 1998 | A |
5778535 | Ledesma | Jul 1998 | A |
5787594 | Estrada | Aug 1998 | A |
5802720 | Pribe | Sep 1998 | A |
5802721 | Wain | Sep 1998 | A |
5911480 | Morgan | Jun 1999 | A |
5933960 | Avidor | Aug 1999 | A |
5944032 | Masterson | Aug 1999 | A |
6018877 | Greene | Feb 2000 | A |
6032372 | Dischler | Mar 2000 | A |
6041503 | Calwell | Mar 2000 | A |
6058608 | Wruck | May 2000 | A |
D428667 | Christian | Jul 2000 | S |
6082007 | Andrews | Jul 2000 | A |
6094820 | Adachi | Aug 2000 | A |
6112421 | Greene | Sep 2000 | A |
6125857 | Silber | Oct 2000 | A |
6141875 | Andrews | Nov 2000 | A |
D435316 | Chenvainu | Dec 2000 | S |
6161288 | Andrews | Dec 2000 | A |
6164290 | Andrews | Dec 2000 | A |
6189222 | Doyle | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6249973 | Hirano | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266888 | Zowaski | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6301785 | Kwiecien et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308416 | Bosy | Oct 2001 | B1 |
D452046 | Borcherds | Dec 2001 | S |
6418623 | Marcarelli | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434828 | Andrews | Aug 2002 | B1 |
D463622 | Harrington | Sep 2002 | S |
6449849 | Hackerman | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6493950 | Kludjian | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6519856 | Dischler | Feb 2003 | B1 |
D472673 | Carvotta | Apr 2003 | S |
6550148 | Cecil | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6581290 | Fishel | Jun 2003 | B1 |
D476772 | Wonderley | Jul 2003 | S |
6598303 | Bosy | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6681665 | Calwell | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6694626 | Kludjian et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6722039 | Kitano | Apr 2004 | B2 |
D495827 | Branden | Sep 2004 | S |
D495844 | Berti | Sep 2004 | S |
D496129 | Ogi | Sep 2004 | S |
6823594 | Kludjian et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
D499511 | Wakayama | Dec 2004 | S |
D500172 | Fields | Dec 2004 | S |
6871403 | Clark | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6886262 | Ohtsubo | May 2005 | B2 |
D506035 | Dombrowski | Jun 2005 | S |
D507379 | Alphonso | Jul 2005 | S |
6915580 | Dassel | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6973730 | Tomassetti | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7028407 | Ehrlich et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7093363 | Kuo | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7103980 | Leventhal | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7140115 | Greene | Nov 2006 | B2 |
D542972 | Pryor | May 2007 | S |
D550400 | Orloff | Sep 2007 | S |
D560032 | Lopez | Jan 2008 | S |
7316045 | Koke | Jan 2008 | B2 |
D563044 | Ramm | Feb 2008 | S |
D585157 | Park | Jan 2009 | S |
7475481 | Napoli | Jan 2009 | B1 |
D587846 | Wonderley | Mar 2009 | S |
D593711 | Yamamoto | Jun 2009 | S |
D603096 | Greene | Oct 2009 | S |
D605362 | Andersen | Dec 2009 | S |
D611653 | Marut | Mar 2010 | S |
D611654 | Nakasuka | Mar 2010 | S |
D611655 | Askew | Mar 2010 | S |
7698823 | Iadarola | Apr 2010 | B1 |
D616147 | Adams | May 2010 | S |
7726032 | Hernandez | Jun 2010 | B1 |
D621544 | Bommarito | Aug 2010 | S |
D623800 | Clemons | Sep 2010 | S |
7856725 | Marut | Dec 2010 | B2 |
D630378 | Jung | Jan 2011 | S |
D631198 | Adams | Jan 2011 | S |
7926183 | Groh | Apr 2011 | B2 |
D638580 | Adams | May 2011 | S |
7934320 | Gratsias et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
D640415 | Wonderley | Jun 2011 | S |
D641928 | Psimadas | Jul 2011 | S |
8006393 | Collins | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8033027 | Leventhal | Oct 2011 | B2 |
D653395 | Adams | Jan 2012 | S |
8091241 | Ouchi et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
D654222 | Coresh | Feb 2012 | S |
D656675 | Payne | Mar 2012 | S |
8141258 | Frisch et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
D659904 | Gilbert | May 2012 | S |
8166658 | Nakasuka | May 2012 | B2 |
8166661 | King | May 2012 | B2 |
D664297 | Prat-Pfister | Jul 2012 | S |
8209869 | Royle | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8307552 | Drouillard | Nov 2012 | B1 |
D669220 | Otsuka | Dec 2012 | S |
D669221 | Otsuka | Dec 2012 | S |
D674546 | Barrow | Jan 2013 | S |
D676197 | Boulanger | Feb 2013 | S |
8413334 | Walker, Jr. et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8479398 | Coresh | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8484852 | King | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8524207 | Ellis | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8539961 | Gaugler | Sep 2013 | B2 |
D698999 | Otsuka | Feb 2014 | S |
D699396 | Hasegawa | Feb 2014 | S |
8671576 | Hotella | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8683641 | Weinberger | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8701291 | Hirano | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8707561 | Kneier | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8726517 | Lau | May 2014 | B2 |
8739411 | Kinghorn | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8782903 | Clarke et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8782911 | Greene | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8839521 | Hazard | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8973272 | Moon | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9049976 | Blocker | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9108328 | Kneier | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9193080 | Whelan et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
D772484 | Otsuka | Nov 2016 | S |
D776384 | Eldridge | Jan 2017 | S |
D777392 | Reaux | Jan 2017 | S |
9604376 | Sacks | Mar 2017 | B2 |
D783900 | Coviello | Apr 2017 | S |
9630332 | Coresh | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9676112 | Bolcar | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9718200 | Dryfhout | Aug 2017 | B2 |
D798065 | Brilla | Sep 2017 | S |
D802213 | Contaldi | Nov 2017 | S |
D808589 | Dryfhout | Jan 2018 | S |
9937629 | Dryfhout | Apr 2018 | B1 |
20020023352 | Mil'shtein | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030000039 | Borcherds | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014871 | Coffin | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030177648 | Zeiter | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030204958 | Jewell | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030208914 | Ehrlich | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040016126 | deBlois | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040035003 | Stiles | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040107585 | Helmrich | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128835 | Coffin | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040177518 | Leventhal | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050066532 | Kludjian | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050188554 | Kjemhus | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198826 | Segrea | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050241162 | Nicolosi | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060101655 | Givant | May 2006 | A1 |
20060130334 | Park | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143926 | Khubani et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060162165 | Villalobos | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070180700 | Sandor | Aug 2007 | A9 |
20070283567 | Magli | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080034525 | Panfili | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090019700 | Shushan | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090032043 | Gaugler | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090255124 | Hasbani | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100071214 | Kinghorn | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100071215 | Wonderley | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100139097 | Perez-Lopez | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110094108 | Wain | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110094114 | Payne-Baggetta | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110167639 | Lau | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110271534 | Briganti | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120090181 | Broekhuizen | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110855 | Allen, Sr. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120151772 | Moon | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120192427 | Hazard | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120192431 | Wain | Aug 2012 | A9 |
20130000127 | Coresh | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130019484 | Allen | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130023807 | Hennessey | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130152400 | Nunez | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130239413 | Fischer | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130298412 | Harski | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140033537 | Ramakrishnan | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140068948 | Marder | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140123506 | Gaines | May 2014 | A1 |
20140150264 | Micinilio | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150217468 | Dryfhout | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150320172 | Spencer | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160151925 | Gers-Barlag | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170217035 | Treu | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170334080 | Dryfhout | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170334081 | Dryfhout | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180035849 | Vergara | Feb 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2936645 | Aug 2015 | CA |
2329495 | Jul 1999 | CN |
2363853 | Feb 2000 | CN |
201693578 | Jan 2011 | CN |
102196886 | Sep 2011 | CN |
202862240 | Apr 2013 | CN |
102006044316 | Mar 2008 | DE |
065820 | Sep 1994 | EP |
1173311 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1356900 | Oct 2003 | EP |
0885698 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1537964 | Jul 2010 | EP |
2918383 | Sep 2015 | EP |
2909025 | May 2008 | FR |
120109 | Oct 1918 | GB |
2306373 | May 1997 | GB |
H07265562 | Oct 1995 | JP |
9-135973 | May 1997 | JP |
2004236766 | Aug 2004 | JP |
1996004110 | Feb 1996 | WO |
WO0245921 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO2012161449 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO2015116561 | Aug 2015 | WO |
WO2017201075 | Nov 2017 | WO |
WO2017201080 | Nov 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Search Report by the Chinese Patent Office dated Aug. 18, 2017 in Chinese patent application No. 2015800064966. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan for JP9-135973A with English abstract. |
Espacenet—Bibliographic data for CN2329495Y with English abstract. |
Espacenet—Bibliographic data for CN2363853Y with English abstract. |
Agnieszka Kozlowska, Studying Tactile Sensitivity—Population Approach, Anthropological Review, vol. 61, pp. 3-10, figs 18, tables 11, ISBN 83-86969-35-0, ISSN 0033-2003, Poznan 1998. |
Sidney Weinstein, Tactile Sensitivity of the Phalanges, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 14, pp. 351-354, Southern Universities Press, © 1962. |
Gemperle, F.; Hirsch, T.; Goode, A.; Pearce, J.; Siewiorek, D.; Smailigic, A. Wearable Vibro-Tactile Display. Carnegie Mellon Wearable Group, Carnegie Mellon University, 2003. |
Sherrick, C. E.; Cholewiak, R. W.; Collins, A. A. The Localization of Low- and High-Frequency Vibrotactile Stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88 (1), 169-179, 1990. |
Verrillo, R. T. Vibrotactile Thresholds for Hairy Skin. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72 (1), 47-50, 1966. |
Zhu, B; Skin-Inspired Haptic Memory Arrays with an Electrically Reconfigurable Architecture, 2015. |
Shih; Dubrowski; Carnahan; Evidence for Haptic Memory, 2009. |
van Erp, J.B.F. Tactile displays for navigation and orientation: perception and behavior (pp. 26-27), Soesterberg, The Netherlands: TNO Human Factors, 2007. |
Myles; Binseel; The Tactile Modality: A Review of Tactile Sensitivity and Human Tactile Interfaces; ARL-TR-4115 report, 2007. |
English Language Abstract for DE102006044316A1 Espacenet Bibliographic data Mar. 27, 2008. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 12, 2017 in PCT/US2017/032949. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Sep. 12, 2017 in PCT/US2017/032949. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 11, 2017 in PCT/US2017/032956. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Sep. 11, 2017 in PCT/US2017/032956. |
Shave from www.ishave.com downloaded Jun. 24, 2008. |
Shave from www.inventorspot.com downloaded Jun. 24, 2008. |
Mangroomer from www.amazon.com/MANGROOMER downloaded Jun. 25, 2008. |
Razorba from www.razorba.com downloaded Jun. 24, 2008. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, English Language Abstract for JP-A-2004-236766 Aug. 26, 2004 Nishida. |
International Search Report dated May 13, 2015 in corresponding PCT/US2015/013009. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated May 13, 2015 in corresponding PCT/US2015/013009. |
Search Report and Office Action from Chinese Patent Office dated Aug. 2, 2018 in corresponding Chinese patent application 201710352681.1. |
English translation of WO0245921A1 published Jun. 13, 2002. |
English translation of JPH07265562A published Sep. 21, 2011. |
English translation of CN201693578U published Jan. 5, 2011. |
English translation of CN2329495Y published Jul. 21, 1999. |
English translation of CN202862240U published Apr. 10, 2013. |
FR2909025 Carlos English Abstract May 30, 2008. |
EP0615820 Schwarz English Abstract Sep. 21, 1994. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14170269 | Jan 2014 | US |
Child | 15156850 | US |