The present invention relates to a bogie frame for a railway vehicle, and a method of monitoring the health of the bogie frame.
The present application claims priority from European application EP23165637.2, filed on Mar. 30, 2023, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference into this application.
Due to increasing societal and political demands for decarbonisation, lightweight construction is a constant concern in machinery structures. Although railway vehicles already provide significant environmental benefits compared to other modes of vehicular transport, structural weight reduction remains an important issue. Lightweight aluminium alloy bogie frames have been proposed to reduce the weight of railway vehicles. However, these structures either contain welded joints or consist of a single casting, which both lead to disadvantages in terms of strength and reliability of the bogie frame.
The use of bolted joints in a bogie frame provides a number of advantages compared to e.g. welded joints. For example, a bolted joint avoids subjecting the bogie frame to residual stresses that may be caused by a welded joint. Also a bolted joint can be easily repaired or replaced. Therefore, the reliability and repairability of the bogie frame can be improved.
Typically, a given bolted joint will include more than one bolt to provide redundancy and spread loads. Therefore, the loosening or failure of a single bolt does not immediately correspond to failure of the whole joint. However, it can be difficult to determine when a bolt has partially or even completely failed if the joint is maintained by the remaining bolt(s), albeit in a weakened arrangement. Essentially, if the loosened or failed bolt is not retightened, repaired or replaced, the load on the remaining bolt(s) is increased and the integrity of the joint as a whole can be compromised.
It would be desirable to provide a way of addressing these issues.
The present invention has been devised in light of the above considerations.
According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a bogie frame for a railway vehicle, the bogie frame comprising structural members defining the frame, and one or more reinforcing components joining the structural members, the or each reinforcing component comprising:
In normal operation, the/each fastening bolt and the/each reinforcing component forming the joint between the first and second structural members supports a respective load across the structural members. When a bolt fails, its load transfers to any remaining bolts and to the one or more of the reinforcing components. This load transfer can increase the load across a particular reinforcing component to such an extent that the reinforcing component accumulates damage. However, this damage accumulation will tend to be focused in the first and/or second end portions of the first fibre-reinforced plastic layer as they are weaker than the central portion. Moreover, because the end portions are transparent or translucent, this damage, which is typically in the form of cracks, can be visually identified on inspection of the reinforcing component. In this way, the joint between the first and second structural members can be monitored for partial or complete failure of one or more of the fastening bolts, even while the joint as a whole remains intact, i.e. capable of transmitting loads between the first and second structural members. Partial bolt failure may include loosening and/or plastic deformation of a bolt. Complete bolt failure may include rupture of a bolt into separate parts.
Thus signs of damage in the first and/or second end portions can give an early indication of bolt failure, providing an opportunity to tighten, repair or replace the failed bolt before subsequent failure of any remaining bolts or rupture of the reinforcing component occurs. Therefore, the reliability and safety of the joint can be improved.
The first fibre-reinforced plastic layer may be made of a glass-fibre-reinforced plastic (GFRP), for example, a glass-fibre-reinforced epoxy resin.
The second fibre-reinforced plastic layer may be made of a carbon-fibre-reinforced plastic (CFRP), for example, a carbon-fibre-reinforced epoxy resin.
The/each reinforcing component may extend between the first and second end portions in a direction which is parallel to that of the one or more fastening bolts which join the first and second structural members.
The bogie frame may comprise a plurality of reinforcing components joining the first and second structural members. The plurality of reinforcing components may be spaced (e.g. at regular intervals) in a row along a line of the joint between the first and second structural members. In this configuration, the plurality of reinforcing components can provide a visual indication of how bolt failure is causing the joint to open by the relative amounts, along the row, of damage accumulation in the first and/or second end portions.
Additionally, or alternatively, when the structural members of the bogie frame are joined by a plurality of fastening bolts, the plurality of reinforcing components may be positioned to assist with identification of a failed fastening bolt. More particularly, when a fastening bolt fails, a greater load will generally be transferred to the reinforcing component which is nearest to the failed bolt. Therefore, damage accumulation is more likely to occur in that reinforcing component.
The plurality of reinforcing components may have different mechanical properties, e.g. different strengths. For example, a higher strength reinforcing component may be located at a position where the load transmission between the first and second structural members is greater.
The plurality of reinforcing components may be configured such that each reinforcing component is adjacent to and aligned with a different respective fastening bolt. For example, each reinforcing component may be located to minimise a separation between the reinforcing component and its fastening. In this configuration, damage accumulation in the first and/or second end portion of a given reinforcing component may be an indication of failure of its fastening bolt.
Generally, the first and the second end portions are equal in size. However, the/each reinforcing component may be asymmetric, e.g. the first end portion may be smaller than the second end portion. For example, the first end portion may extend a shorter distance from the central portion than the second end portion. In this configuration, load distribution in the reinforcing component can be such that damage accumulation in the first end portion is more concentrated and therefore easier to visualise than damage accumulation in the second end portion. Conveniently, the first end portion may be located at a more accessible location on the bogie frame, e.g. a location closer to an outer side of the bogie frame, than the second end portion.
The first and second end portions may be adhesively bonded to the first and second structural members, respectively. For example, a structural adhesive such as epoxy, acrylic or urethane may be used to form an adhesive bond. Compared to other fixings, such as mechanical fixings, adhesive bonds are generally lighter and reduce stress concentrations.
The/each reinforcing component is typically formed as a strip, for example in which the first fibre-reinforced plastic layer provides a planar substrate and the second fibre-reinforced plastic layer is bonded to one side of the planar substrate.
The first and/or the second end portion may be divided into a plurality of fingers which attach to the respective structural member. For example, the plurality of fingers may extend in a direction which is parallel to that of the one or more fastening bolts which join the first and second structural members.
The plurality of fingers may be spaced (e.g. at regular intervals) in a row along a line of the joint between the first and second structural members. In this configuration, the plurality of fingers can provide a visual indication of how bolt failure is causing the joint to open by the relative amounts, along the row, of damage accumulation in the fingers.
Additionally, or alternatively, when the structural members of the bogie frame are joined by a plurality of fastening bolts, the plurality of fingers may be positioned to assist with identification of a failed fastening bolt. More particularly, when a fastening bolt fails, a greater load will generally be transferred to the finger nearest to the failed bolt. Therefore, damage is more likely to occur in that finger.
The plurality of fingers of the/each end portion may be separately attached to the respective structural elements. For example, the plurality of fingers may have distinct and separate adhesive bonds with the respective structural member. In this way, interfacial failure of the bond of one of the fingers (e.g. a delamination crack) is less likely to extend into another bond of an adjacent finger leading to similar failure of the other bond.
The/each reinforcing component may further comprise one or more sensors configured to monitor strain in the first and/or second end portions. For example, the one or more sensors can be located at a relatively inaccessible location on the bogie frame, e.g. on one of the first and second end portions which is located further from an outer side of the bogie frame than the other end portion.
When the first and/or the second end portion is divided into a plurality of fingers which attach to the respective structural member, the one or more sensors may be configured to monitor strain in each finger separately. Therefore, the sensors may monitor the type or direction of the load causing the failure of a fastening bolt and/or which fastening bolt has failed.
The/each reinforcing component may further comprise a removable cover configured to protect an exposed surface of one of the first and second end portions. In this way, superficial damage to the exposed surface (e.g. by scratching), or dirt accumulation on the exposed surface, may not hamper the visual identification of damage accumulation in the/each end portion. Conveniently, both end portions may be protected by respective removable covers.
When the first and/or second end portion comprises the plurality of fingers, each of the fingers may further comprise respective removable covers each configured to protect an exposed surface of its finger.
The first structural member may be one of a pair of side members of the bogie frame, e.g. the side members may extend in a longitudinal direction of the railway vehicle. Conveniently, the side members may be extrusions, e.g. made of an aluminium alloy. The extrusion direction may be along the longitudinal direction.
The second structural member may be a centre member which extends between the pair of side members, e.g. the centre member may extend between the side members in a transverse direction of the railway vehicle, perpendicular to its longitudinal direction. The centre member may be a metal casting, e.g. an iron-based casting or an aluminium alloy casting.
According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of monitoring the health of the bogie frame according to the first aspect, the method including:
As mentioned above, joint deterioration can be caused by failure of at least one of the fastening bolts. Thus the method may further include identifying a partially or completely failed fastening bolt as the cause of joint deterioration.
When the reinforcing component comprises the removable cover(s), the inspection step may include removing the/each removable cover from the/each end portion or from one or more of the plurality of fingers.
When the first and/or second end portion comprises the plurality of fingers, the inspection step may include comparing amounts of any damage to respective fingers.
Additionally, or alternatively, when the bogie frame comprises a plurality of reinforcing components, the inspection step may include comparing amounts of any damage to respective end portions of the components.
The invention includes the combination of the aspects and preferred features described except where such a combination is clearly impermissible or expressly avoided.
Embodiments and experiments illustrating the principles of the invention will now be discussed with reference to the accompanying figures in which:
Further background to the present invention, and aspects and embodiments of the present invention will now be discussed with reference to the accompanying figures. Further aspects and embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art. All documents mentioned in this text are incorporated herein by reference.
Usually, two bogies (not shown) are fitted to each car body 10 of the railway vehicle 1, one near each end of the car body 10. However, the bogie 2 may be disposed between adjacent car bodies 10. The bogie 2 is important for providing stability to the railway vehicle 1 by absorbing strong vibrations and high centrifugal forces, particularly on curved sections of the track 4.
The depicted centre member 16 comprises a cast element 18 being a cast multi-chamber element 18 which may be made from metal casting. In the depicted examples of the centre member 16 shown in
However, it may also be possible that only a part of the centre member 16 consists of a cast multi-chamber element 18 and further parts thereof may have other designs.
For example, the cast material of the multi-chamber element 18 may be iron-based or aluminium alloy. Preferably, the cast material may be an aluminium alloy. The depicted centre member 16 has an opening 18c in a top view, which is arranged symmetrically to a longitudinal axis of the centre member 16. By arranging the opening 18c as shown in
In the upper surface 18a of the cast multi-chamber element 18 there are provided two recesses 18d for receiving first strengtheners 20, the bottom 18da of which lies in a plane parallel to the upper surface 18a. The insertion of the first strengtheners 20 into the recesses 18d will be described later in connection with
Another contact surface 24a is provided adjacent to the upper surface 18a of the multi-chamber element 18 on both sides thereof facing a contact surface 24b of the extruded profile 14a. Further, one can recognize a fastening element 26 at a front side of the centre member 16, which is integrated in the cast structure of the multi-chamber element 18. This fastening element 26, may be an element for connecting the bogie frame 6′ to a centre pin (not depicted) mounted on the car body 10.
Furthermore, it can be derived from
An advantage of the bogie frame 6′ shown in the
In this example, each side member 14 comprises a straight extruded profile 14a and two cast curved elements 28 made from metal casting. The depicted straight extruded profiles 14a include a plurality of holes 64 for connecting them with the centre member 16 by bolt connections (fastening bolts) 62 (cf.
For example, the cast curved elements 28 may be made of iron or aluminium alloy. Preferably, the cast curved elements 28 may be made of an aluminium alloy. Most preferably, the aluminium alloy may be a cast alloy of the 7x xx.x series.
The cast curved elements 28 shown in
In other words, the curved element 28 comprises an integrated connecting part 28ba that allows the curved element 28 to be coupled to at least one wheel 8 of the railway vehicle 1. This means that cast curved elements 28 allow the bogie frame 6′ to be connected to the set of wheels 8 via the integrated connecting parts 28ba.
As visible in
Furthermore, the position of the joining points 38a, at which the cast curved element 28 is connected to the extruded profile 14a, is depicted in
Furthermore, the enlarged section of the bogie frame 6′ shown in
The depicted strengthener 44 is a flat element which can be inserted into the cast structure of the curved element 28 of the side member 14 (cf.
Each strengthener 44 may be fixed to the respective cast curved element 28 by a bolt connection via the joining points 44a. It may be also possible to fix the strengtheners 44 to the cast curved elements 28 by means of adhesive bonds. The strengthener 44 may be made of steel and/or carbon fibre-reinforced plastic (CFRP). The strengtheners 44 may be produced using a casting process or any other suitable production process.
The depicted first strengtheners 20 are also flat elements having approximately the form of a bird. They are inserted into a recess 18d provided in the upper surface 18a of the multi-chamber element 18 such that it forms a flat surface with the latter (cf.
Having a “bird shape” means for the first strengthener 20 to extend longitudinally and transversely of the railway vehicle 1 when inserted into the recess 18d in the upper surface 18a of the multi-chamber element 18a. In this case, an extension in the longitudinal direction L of the railway vehicle 1 is larger than an extension in the transverse direction thereof. Furthermore, the “bird shape” of the first strengthener 20 results in a symmetrical shape of the extension in the longitudinal direction L of the railway vehicle 1, wherein a width of the extension in this longitudinal direction L increases with increasing distance from a transverse axis of the first strengthener 20.
The “bird shape” may, for example, be achieved by forming an outer contour of the first strengthener 20 in a top view such that an outer contour of a side thereof facing an outside of the centre member 16 in the longitudinal direction L of the railway vehicle 1 has a W-shape and an outer contour of an opposite side has a T-shape, wherein the bottom of the W and the top of the T are facing each other (cf. also
Inserting the first strengthener 20, having approximately the form of a bird in a top view, in a recess 18d in the upper surface 18a of the multi-chamber element 18 further increases the stiffness thereof without limiting the space required for mounting the components of the railway vehicle 1.
The first strengtheners 20 may also be made of steel and/or CFRP. They may be fixed to the centre member 16 by bold connections and or adhesive bonds. The first strengtheners 20 may be produced using a casting process or any other process appropriate to create the specific shape of the first strengthener 20.
In particular,
The struts 48a extend in longitudinal direction of the centre element 16, which means they can increase the stiffness in lateral direction of the bogie frame 6′. In the presented case, each second strengthener 48 uses three mounting brackets 50 to keep the struts 48a in the desired position. The second strengtheners 48 may be connected via the mounting brackets to the upper or lower surface 18a, 18b of the cast multi-chamber element 18 by a bolt connection and/or an adhesive bond.
Preferably, the second strengtheners 48 may be made of CFRP. This allows for increasing the stiffness of the centre member 16 without increasing its weight significantly.
Furthermore, the brackets 50 may also be fixed to the upper surface 18a of the multi-chamber element 18 via elastic adhesive bonds (not shown). The damping effect of the elastic adhesive material can contribute to absorption of the vibration and noise when transmitting through the bogie frame 6′. In addition, the bonding with the elastic adhesive can contribute to reduction of the thermal stress induced by the mismatch of the thermal properties between the CFRP and the cast material of the multi-chamber element 18. This results in improved mechanical strength and stiffness at the adhesive bond area on the upper surface 18a of the multi-chamber element 18.
Although the fastening bolts 62 are configured to receive most of the load between the side members 14 and the centre member 16, the side members 14 are also joined to the centre member 16 by the reinforcing components 60, which extend between the side members 14 and the centre member 16 in the transverse direction T of the railway vehicle 1, which is substantially parallel to the direction of the fastening bolts 62. Specifically, in
In normal operation, each fastening bolt 62 and each reinforcing component 60 forms a joint between the structural members 14, 16 and supports a respective load across the structural members 14, 16. If one of the fastening bolts 62 partially or completely fails, its load transfers to the remaining bolts 62 and to the reinforcing component(s) 60 across the same joint. This load transfer can increase the load across a particular reinforcing component 60 to such an extent that visible damage accumulates on that reinforcing component 60, as discussed in more detail below. In this way, the joints between the side members 14 and the centre member 16 can be monitored for failure of the fastening bolts 62, even when most of the fastening bolts 62 have not failed and the joint as a whole appears to be fully intact and capable of transmitting the necessary loads between the structural members 14, 16. Therefore, the visible damage gives an early indication that a fastening bolt 62 has failed, providing an opportunity to tighten, repair or replace the failed bolt 62 before subsequent failure of any of the remaining bolts 62 or rupture of either of the reinforcing components 60 occurs.
In this configuration, failure of the particular fastening bolt 62 can be identified with more certainty. In particular, if the reinforcing component 60a is visibly more damaged than the other reinforcing component 60 on the same side of the centre member 16, it is more likely that the damage was caused by failure of the particular fastening bolt 62 rather than other more distant fastening bolts.
Each reinforcing component 60 is formed as a strip and comprises a planar, first fibre-reinforced plastic layer 70 having a first end portion 72 and a second end portion 74, the first 72 and second 74 end portions being spaced in the direction T. The first end portion 72 is attached to a platform formed on an upper surface 15 of the side member 14 (first structural member 14). The second end portion 74 is attached to a platform formed on an upper surface 18a of the centre member 16 (second structural member 16).
The first end portion 72 and the second end portion 74 are adhesively bonded to their platforms on the side member 14 and the centre member 16, respectively. A structural adhesive such as epoxy, acrylic or urethane can be used to form the adhesive bond. The adhesive bond is generally lighter than an equivalent mechanical fixing and reduces stress concentrations in the reinforcing component 60 and the structural members 14, 16.
The reinforcing component 60 further comprises a second fibre-reinforced plastic layer 76 disposed on a mid part of the first fibre-reinforced plastic layer 70 between its first end portion 72 and its second end portion 74 such that the first and second end portions 72, 74 are left uncovered by the second fibre-reinforced plastic layer 76. The second fibre-reinforced plastic layer 76 forms with the mid part of the first fibre-reinforced plastic layer 70 a central portion 78 of the reinforcing component 60 that is stronger than the first and second end portions 72, 74.
Additionally, the first 72 and second 74 end portions of the first fibre-reinforced plastic layer 70 are transparent or translucent. Preferably, the first fibre-reinforced plastic layer 70 is made of glass fibre-reinforced plastic (GFRP), e.g. a glass-fibre-reinforced epoxy resin, which is inherently translucent. Preferably, the second fibre-reinforced plastic layer 76 is made of a carbon-fibre-reinforced plastic (CFRP), e.g. a carbon-fibre-reinforced epoxy resin.
In
In this configuration, the reinforcing components 60a, 60b, 60c can provide a visual indication of how the joint may be opening under bolt failure. For example, if the joint is opening more at the end of the row where reinforcing component 60a is located, then the expectation would be that the amount of visible damage accumulation would be greatest in the first and/or second end portions 72, 74 of reinforcing component 60a, and least in the first and/or second end portions 72, 74 of reinforcing component 60c. Conversely, if the joint is opening more at the other end of the row, then the expectation would be reversed, with greater amounts of visible damage accumulation in the first and/or second end portions 72, 74 of reinforcing component 60c. Related to this, the locations of the reinforcing components 60a, 60b, 60c may assist with identification of the fastening bolt which has failed. For example, if the fastening bolt at hole 64a fails, more of its load will tend to transfer to the closest reinforcing component 60a than to the other reinforcing components 60b, 60c. Consequently, the formation of cracks 80 in the first 72 and/or second 74 end portions of the closest reinforcing component 60a may be an indication that the fastening bolt in the first hole 64a has failed.
The reinforcing components 60 of the bogie frame 6 in
In
By such an adjustment, the load distribution in the reinforcing component 160 can be such that damage accumulation in the first end portion 172 is more concentrated and therefore easier to view than damage accumulation in the second end portion 174. Conveniently, the first end portion 172 can then be located at a more accessible location on the bogie frame 6, e.g. on an outer side of the bogie frame 6 attaching to the side member 14, rather than attaching to the less reachable centre member 16.
Like the row of reinforcing components 60a, 60b, 60c of
Typically, the fingers 296, 298 of the first end portion 272 and the second end portion 274 are attached to the respective structural elements 14, 16 by distinct and separate adhesive bonds. Accordingly, interfacial failure of the adhesive bond of one of the fingers (e.g. a delamination crack) is then less likely to extend across to an adjacent finger.
However, the fingers 296 of the first end portion 272, which are inward of the side member 14, also carry respective sensors 394, such as strain gauges, configured to monitor strain in the first end portion 272. In this way, the first end portion 272 can still be monitored despite being relatively inaccessible to visual inspection. The sensors 394 also enable the reinforcing component 260 to be monitored continuously, e.g. to obtain data of the load across the joint in real time. This can speed up diagnosis of fastening bolt failure.
The features disclosed in the foregoing description, or in the following claims, or in the accompanying drawings, expressed in their specific forms or in terms of a means for performing the disclosed function, or a method or process for obtaining the disclosed results, as appropriate, may, separately, or in any combination of such features, be utilised for realising the invention in diverse forms thereof.
While the invention has been described in conjunction with the exemplary embodiments described above, many equivalent modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art when given this disclosure. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments of the invention set forth above are considered to be illustrative and not limiting. Various changes to the described embodiments may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
For the avoidance of any doubt, any theoretical explanations provided herein are provided for the purposes of improving the understanding of a reader. The inventors do not wish to be bound by any of these theoretical explanations.
Any section headings used herein are for organizational purposes only and are not to be construed as limiting the subject matter described.
Throughout this specification, including the claims which follow, unless the context requires otherwise, the word “comprise” and “include”, and variations such as “comprises”, “comprising”, and “including” will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or step or group of integers or steps but not the exclusion of any other integer or step or group of integers or steps.
It must be noted that, as used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Ranges may be expressed herein as from “about” one particular value, and/or to “about” another particular value. When such a range is expressed, another embodiment includes from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by the use of the antecedent “about,” it will be understood that the particular value forms another embodiment. The term “about” in relation to a numerical value is optional and means for example +/−10%.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
23165637.2 | Mar 2023 | EP | regional |