The present disclosure relates to a boil-off gas reliquefaction method and system.
Recently, consumption of liquefied gas such as liquefied natural gas (LNG) has been rapidly increasing worldwide. Liquefied gas obtained by cooling natural gas to an extremely low temperature has a much smaller volume than natural gas and thus is much more suitable for storage and transportation. In addition, liquefied gas such as LNG is an eco-friendly fuel that has low air pollutant emissions upon combustion, since air pollutants in natural gas can be reduced or removed during a liquefaction process.
LNG is a colorless and transparent liquid obtained by cooling natural gas mainly composed of methane to about −163° C. to liquefy natural gas and has a volume of about 1/600 that of natural gas. Thus, liquefaction of natural gas enables very efficient transportation.
However, since natural gas is liquefied at an extremely low temperature of −163° C. under normal pressure, LNG can easily evaporate with a small change in temperature. Although an LNG storage tank is insulated, external heat is continuously transferred to the storage tank, causing LNG in transit to naturally evaporate, thereby generating BOG (BOG).
Generation of BOG means a loss of LNG and thus has a great influence on transportation efficiency. In addition, when BOG accumulates in a storage tank, there is a risk that the pressure inside the storage tank will excessively rise, causing damage to the tank. Various studies have been conducted to treat BOG generated in an LNG storage tank.
The disclosure of this section is to provide background of the invention. Applicant notes that this section may contain information available before this application. However, by providing this section, Applicant does not admit that any information contained in this section constitutes prior art.
One aspect of the present disclosure provides a boil-off gas reliquefaction method and system in which, among boil-off gas generated in a storage tank of a liquefied natural gas (LNG) vessel to be supplied as fuel to an engine, surplus boil-off gas above fuel requirement of the engine is re-liquefied using the boil-off gas as a refrigerant. Embodiments of the present invention provide a BOG reliquefaction method and system which can exhibit stabilized reliquefaction performance, thereby increasing overall reliquefaction efficiency and reliquefaction amount.
In accordance one aspect of the present invention, a BOG reliquefaction system for LNG vessels includes: a compressor compressing BOG; a heat exchanger cooling the compressed BOG by exchanging heat between the compressed BOG and BOG used as a refrigerant; and an expansion unit for expanding the BOG having been cooled by the heat exchanger, wherein the heat exchanger includes: a core in which heat exchange between a hot fluid and a cold fluid occurs, the core including a plurality of diffusion blocks; and a fluid diffusion member diffusing a fluid introduced into the core or a fluid discharged from the core.
The fluid diffusion member may resist a flow of a fluid to diffuse the fluid.
The fluid diffusion member may be a perforated panel.
The heat exchanger may further include: a hot fluid inlet header diffusing the hot fluid introduced into the heat exchanger to send the hot fluid to the core; a hot fluid outlet header collecting the hot fluid discharged from the core to discharge the hot fluid outside the heat exchanger; a cold fluid inlet header diffusing the cold fluid introduced into the heat exchanger to send the cold fluid to the core; and a cold fluid outlet header collecting the cold fluid discharged from the core to discharge the cold fluid outside the heat exchanger, the perforated panel being disposed between the hot fluid inlet header and the core, between the hot fluid outlet header and the core, between the cold fluid inlet header and the core, and/or between the cold fluid outlet header and the core.
Holes of the perforated panel may have cross-sectional areas that increase with increasing distance from a pipe through which a fluid is introduced or discharged.
Holes of the perforated panel may have a density that increases with increasing distance from the pipe through which a fluid is introduced or discharged.
The perforated panel may be separated a distance of 20 mm to 50 mm from the core.
The heat exchanger may include at least one partition, wherein the partition is disposed between the perforated panel and the core to prevent a fluid having been diffused by the perforated panel from being combined again.
The partition may be configured to divide an inner space thereof into plural sections.
The partition may not only prevent the refrigerant from being combined again among the plurality of diffusion blocks but also prevent the refrigerant from being combined again inside one diffusion block.
The partition may allow the perforated panel to remain separated from the core.
The partition may have a grid structure including at least one first bar extending in one direction and at least one second bar crossing the at least first one bar to divide an inner space thereof into plural sections.
The BOG reliquefaction system may further include a gas/liquid separator disposed downstream of the expansion unit to separate the expanded BOG into a re-liquefied gas and a gaseous component.
The gaseous component separated by the gas/liquid separator may be combined with BOG to be used as the refrigerant in the heat exchanger.
The BOG having been compressed by the compressor may be in a super-critical state.
The BOG having been compressed by the compressor may have a pressure of 100 bara to 400 bara.
The BOG having been compressed by the compressor may have a pressure of 150 bara to 400 bara.
The BOG having been compressed by the compressor may have a pressure of 150 bara to 300 bara.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a BOG reliquefaction system for LNG vessels includes: a compressor compressing BOG; a heat exchanger cooling the compressed BOG by exchanging heat between the compressed BOG and BOG used as a refrigerant; and an expansion unit for expanding the BOG having been cooled by the heat exchanger, wherein the heat exchanger includes a core in which heat exchange between a hot fluid and a cold fluid occurs, the core including a plurality of diffusion blocks and a difference in temperature between the plurality of diffusion blocks is in the range of 40° C. to 50° C.
In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, a BOG reliquefaction system for LNG vessels includes: a compressor compressing BOG; a heat exchanger cooling the compressed BOG by exchanging heat between the compressed BOG and BOG used as a refrigerant; and an expansion unit for expanding the BOG having been cooled by the heat exchanger, wherein the heat exchanger includes a core in which heat exchange between a hot fluid and a cold fluid occurs, the core including a plurality of diffusion blocks and a flow rate measured on a diffusion block to or from which the largest amount of fluid is supplied or discharged is less than 4 times that measured on a diffusion block to or from which the smallest amount of fluid is supplied or discharged.
According to embodiments, reliquefaction performance can be stably maintained regardless of change in flow rate of BOG to be re-liquefied.
According to embodiments, a fluid supplied to or discharged from a heat exchanger can be diffused, thereby preventing a flow of refrigerant from being concentrated on one diffusion block.
According to embodiments, a refrigerant can be evenly diffused inside one diffusion block, as well as evenly distributed to plural diffusion blocks, and a perforated panel can remain separated from a core. Particularly, it is possible to prevent the perforated panel from contacting the core and blocking a flow path of a fluid into the core.
According to embodiments, a perforated panel is coupled to a heat exchanger such that thermal expansion and contraction of the perforated panel can be relieved. Thus, the perforated plate can be prevented from being bent or broken despite suffering from shrinkage due to contact with BOG at ultra-low temperature and a joint between the perforated plate and the heat exchanger can also be prevented from being broken.
According to embodiments, the heat exchanger includes a channel capable of resisting a flow of fluid, thereby suppressing or preventing a flow of a refrigerant from being concentrated on one diffusion block without using a separate member for fluid diffusion.
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. The present invention may be applied to various vessels such as a vessel equipped with an engine fueled by natural gas and a vessel including a liquefied gas storage tank. It should be understood that the following embodiments can be modified in various ways and do not limit the scope of the present invention.
For treatment of BOG, BOG may be re-liquefied to be returned to an LNG storage tank. BOG may be used as an energy source in a source of fuel consumption such as a marine engine, and the like.
Examples of a method for reliquefaction of BOG include a method of using a refrigeration cycle with a separate refrigerant in which BOG is allowed to exchange heat with the refrigerant to be re-liquefied and a method of using BOG as a refrigerant to re-liquefy BOG without any separate refrigerant. Particularly, a system employing the latter method is called a partial reliquefaction system (PRS).
Examples of a marine engine capable of being fueled by natural gas include gas engines such as a DFDE engine, an X-DF engine, and an ME-GI engine.
A DFDE engine has four strokes per cycle and uses an Otto cycle in which natural gas having a relatively low pressure of about 6.5 bar is injected into a combustion air inlet, followed by pushing a piston upward to compress the gas.
An X-DF engine has two strokes per cycle and uses an Otto cycle using natural gas having a pressure of about 16 bar as fuel.
An ME-GI engine has two strokes per cycle and uses a diesel cycle in which natural gas having a high-pressure of about 300 bar is injected directly into a combustion chamber in the vicinity of the top dead center of a piston.
A BOG treatment system according to embodiments of the present invention described below may be applied to all types of vessels and marine structures provided with a storage tank storing low-temperature liquid cargo or liquefied gas, including vessels such as LNG carriers, liquefied ethane gas carriers, and LNG RVs and marine structures such as LNG FPSOs and LNG FSRUs. In the following embodiments, liquefied natural gas, which is a representative low-temperature liquid cargo, will be used by way of example, and the term “LNG vessel” may include LNG carriers, LNG RVs, LNG FPSOs, and LNG FSRUs, without being limited thereto.
In addition, a fluid in each line according to embodiments of the present invention may be in any one of a liquid state, a gas-liquid mixed state, a gas state, and a supercritical fluid state, depending upon operating conditions of the system.
Referring to
The BOG having been compressed by the compressor and cooled by the heat exchanger is separated into a liquid component and a gaseous component by a gas/liquid separator after passing through a pressure reducing means (for example, an expansion valve, an expander, etc.). The liquid component separated by the gas/liquid separator is returned to the storage tank and the gaseous component separated by the gas/liquid separator is combined with the BOG ({circle around (1)}) discharged from the storage tank and then supplied to the heat exchanger to be used as the refrigerant.
In the BOG reliquefaction system according to embodiments of the present invention, reliquefaction of BOG is performed using BOG discharged from the storage tank as refrigerant without any separate cycle for reliquefaction of BOG. It should be understood that the present invention is not limited thereto and a separate refrigeration cycle may be established to ensure reliquefaction of all BOG, as needed. Such a separate cycle can ensure reliquefaction of almost all BOG despite requiring separate equipment or an additional power source.
Reliquefaction performance of a BOG reliquefaction system using BOG as refrigerant as set forth above varies greatly depending on the pressure of BOG to be liquefied (hereinafter, “reliquefaction target BOG”). An experiment (hereinafter, “Experiment 1”) was conducted to determine change in reliquefaction performance with varying pressure of reliquefaction target BOG. Results are as follows:
Experiment 1 was conducted under the following conditions:
1. Target vessel: An LNG carrier including a high-pressure gas injection engine as a propulsion engine and a low-pressure engine as a power generation engine.
2. Process simulator: Aspen HYSYS V8.0
3. Equation for calculating property values: Peng-Robinson equation
4. Amount of BOG: 3800 kg/h, in consideration of the fact that about 3500 kg/h to about 4000 kg/h of BOG is generated in a 170,000 cubic meter (CBM) LNG carrier.
5. Component of BOG: 10% nitrogen (N2) and 90% methane (CH4), common to BOG discharged from the storage tank and BOG compressed by the compressor.
6. Pressure and temperature of BOG discharged from storage tank: Pressure: 1.06 bara, temperature: −120° C.
7. Fuel consumption of engine: The total BOG consumption by the propulsion engine and the power generation engine was assumed to be 2,660 kg/h, accounting for 70% of the total amount of BOG generated in the storage tank (3,800 kg/h), although such engines are operated under a low load in view of economic efficiency in actual operation of an LNG vessel.
8. Capacity of compressor: Capacity of the compressor was assumed to cover 120% (3,800 kg/h×120%=4,650 kg/h) of the amount of BOG generated in the storage tank in terms of the intake flow rate of the compressor, considering that the compressor has a capacity to cover up to 150% of the total amount of BOG generated in the storage tank.
9. Performance of heat exchanger: Logarithmic mean temperature difference (LMTD); 13° C. or higher, minimum approach: 3° C. or higher
In design of a heat exchanger, for given temperature and heat flux values of a cold fluid and a hot fluid introduced into the heat exchanger, the logarithmic mean temperature difference (LMTD) is minimized to the extent that the temperature of a fluid used as a refrigerant is not higher than the temperature of a fluid to be cooled (that is, to the extent that graphs depicting the heat flux-dependent temperature of the cold fluid and the hot fluid do not cross each other).
For a countercurrent flow heat exchanger in which a hot fluid and a cold fluid are introduced and discharged in opposite directions, respectively, the LMTD is a value expressed by (d2−d1)/1n(d2/d1), wherein di=th2−tc1 and d2=th1−tc2 (tc1: temperature of the cold fluid before the heat exchanger, tc2: temperature of the cold fluid having passed through the heat exchanger, th1: temperature of the hot fluid before the heat exchanger, th2: temperature of the hot fluid having passed through the heat exchanger). Here, a lower value of the LMTD indicates higher efficiency of the heat exchanger.
The LMTD is represented by the distance between graphs depicting the heat flux-dependent temperature of the cold fluid used as a refrigerant and the hot fluid cooled through heat exchange with the refrigerant. A shorter distance between the graphs indicates a lower value of the LMTD, which, in turn, indicates higher efficiency of the heat exchanger.
Under the above experimental conditions 1 to 9, thermodynamic calculations were performed to quantitatively demonstrate the effect of high-pressure compression of reliquefaction target BOG on reliquefaction performance. In order to verify BOG pressure-dependent reliquefaction performance and cooling curve characteristics of the heat exchanger, the reliquefaction amount and cooling curve of the heat exchanger were thermodynamically calculated when the pressure of reliquefaction target BOG was 39 bara, 50 bara to 200 bara (at intervals of 10 bara), 250 bara, and 300 bara.
Table 1 shows theoretical expected values of reliquefaction performance of the BOG reliquefaction system according to the embodiment of the present invention depending upon the pressure of reliquefaction target BOG.
Referring to
The greatest difference between reliquefaction target BOG at low pressure and reliquefaction target BOG at high pressure is “cooling temperature before expansion”. As shown in
This is because, due to properties of methane (CH4), which is a main component of BOG, a latent heat section is present on the graph of heat flux-dependent change in temperature when the pressure of BOG is below a critical pressure (about 47 bara for pure methane) and a section similar to the latent heat section is still present but reduced when the pressure of BOG is higher than or equal to the critical pressure. Thus, it is desirable that reliquefaction of BOG be performed at a pressure higher than or equal to 47 bara, i.e., the critical pressure, in view of increase in reliquefaction amount.
Generally, an ME-GI engine is supplied with a fuel gas at a pressure of 150 bara to 400 bara (particularly 300 bara). As shown in
In Table 1, “reliquefaction amount” denotes an amount of re-liquefied LNG having passed through the compressor 10, the heat exchanger 20, the pressure reducer 30, and the gas/liquid separator 40 as shown in
In addition, the reliquefaction performance may be represented by “reliquefaction rate”, which refers to a value obtained by dividing the amount of re-liquefied LNG by the total amount of the reliquefaction target BOG. In other words, “reliquefaction amount” indicates the absolute amount of re-liquefied LNG and “reliquefaction rate” indicates a proportion of the re-liquefied LNG to total reliquefaction target BOG.
For example, when an LNG vessel is operated at low speed and BOG consumption of a propulsion engine is thus reduced, the amount of reliquefaction target BOG increases causing increase in “reliquefaction amount”. However, under the conditions of Experiment 1, “reliquefaction rate” can be reduced since the sum of the BOG discharged from the storage tank, which is a fluid used as a refrigerant, and the gaseous component separated by the gas/liquid separator is almost constant due to capacity limitations of the compressor.
In Experiment 1, the flow rate of the refrigerant into the compressor is 4560 kg/h, which is 120% of the flow rate (3800 kg/h) of BOG from the storage tank, and the flow rate of reliquefaction target BOG is 1,900 kg/h, which is obtained by subtracting 2660 kg/h, which is a gas consumption of engines (ME-GI engine: 2,042 kg/h+DFDE engine: 618 kg/h) from the flow rate of the refrigerant into the compressor.
In addition, no great change in reliquefaction amount was observed when the pressure of reliquefaction target BOG was increased from 300 bara to 400 bara, and a difference between reliquefaction amounts when the pressure of reliquefaction target BOG is 150 bara and when the pressure of reliquefaction target BOG is 400 bara was less than 4%.
In each of the graphs depicting
In each of the graphs depicting
In conclusion, high reliquefaction performance can be obtained when reliquefaction target BOG is in a supercritical state, particularly when the pressure of reliquefaction target BOG is in the range of 100 bara to 400 bara, preferably 150 bara to 400 bara, more preferably 150 bara to 300 bara.
Considering that an ME-GI engine is requires a fuel gas in the pressure range of 150 bara and 400 bara, when BOG compressed to a pressure level that meets pressure requirements of the ME-GI engine is used as reliquefaction target BOG, high reliquefaction performance can be obtained. Therefore, a system fueling an ME-GI engine is advantageously associated with a BOG reliquefaction system in which BOG is used as a refrigerant.
In Experiment 1, reliquefaction performance depending upon the pressure of reliquefaction target BOG was evaluated using a simulation program. In order to investigate whether the same is true for an actual reliquefaction apparatus using a heat exchanger, an experiment using a printed circuit heat exchanger (PCHE) (hereinafter, “Experiment 2”) was conducted.
Under actual operating conditions of an LNG vessel, emission of BOG is constant, but BOG consumption of an engine is changed, resulting in change in amount of surplus BOG, i.e., a reliquefaction target. In Experiment 2, reliquefaction performance of an actual reliquefaction apparatus was evaluated while varying the amount of reliquefaction target BOG. For experimental convenience, nitrogen was initially used in place of methane, which is explosive; the temperature of nitrogen used as a refrigerant was adjusted to be equal to the temperature of BOG discharged from the storage tank; and the other conditions were also adjusted to be identical to conditions 1 to 9 of Experiment 1.
Considering that fuel consumption of an ME-GI engine varies depending on operating conditions, the ME-GI engine is assumed to be used in an actual LNG carrier. Under the conditions in Experiment 1, assuming that the size of the ME-GI engine is 25 MW (two units of 12.5 MW), the LNG carrier may sail at about 19.5 knots when operated at full speed (fuel consumption of the engine: about 3,800 kg/h) and may sail at 17 knots when operated at economical speed (fuel consumption of the engine: about 2,660 kg/h). Considering actual operating conditions, the LNG carrier is supposed to be in operation at a full speed of about 19.5 knots, in operation at an economical speed of 17 knots, or at anchor (fuel consumption of ME-GI engine: 0, fuel consumption of DFDG engine: 618 kg/h). In Experiment 2, reliquefaction performance was evaluated assuming that the LNG carrier would be operated under these conditions.
In a test using nitrogen as refrigerant and reliquefaction target BOG, reliquefaction performance was almost the same level as theoretical expected values in Experiment 1 regardless of the amount of reliquefaction target BOG. In other words, although BOG consumption of a propulsion engine and thus the amount of reliquefaction target BOG varied depending upon the speed of the LNG carrier, reliquefaction performance remained stable regardless of the amount of reliquefaction target BOG when nitrogen was used as a refrigerant and reliquefaction target BOG.
In a test using methane (i.e., BOG generated in an actual storage tank) as refrigerant and reliquefaction target BOG instead of nitrogen in the actual BOG reliquefaction system, reliquefaction performance was almost the same level as the theoretical expected values in Experiment 1 when the LNG carrier was at anchor or in operation at approximately full speed (during operation at full speed, most of the BOG generated in the LNG storage tank can be used as fuel). However, when the LNG carrier was in operation at economical speed (fuel consumption: 70% of the fuel consumption in full-speed operation) or in operation at a speed below the economical speed, reliquefaction performance was below 70% of the theoretical expected values and, particularly was much lower than that level in a specific speed range. In other words, in the test using methane (i.e., BOG generated in an actual storage tank) as refrigerant and reliquefaction target BOG, reliquefaction performance fell short of the theoretical expected values when the amount of reliquefaction target BOG was in a specific range.
Specifically, reliquefaction performance fell short of the theoretical expected values under the following conditions:
1. When the LNG carrier using a 25 MW ME-GI engine was operated at a speed of 10 to 17 knots.
2. When the amount of BOG generated in the storage tank was 3,800 kg/h and the amount of BOG used as fuel in engines (ME-GI engine for propulsion+DFDG engine for power generation) was in the range of 1,100 kg/h to 2,660 kg/h.
3. When the amount of BOG generated in the storage tank was 3,800 kg/h and the amount of reliquefaction target BOG was in the range of 1,900 kg/h to 3,300 kg/h.
4. When an amount ratio of reliquefaction target BOG to BOG used as a refrigerant (including the gaseous component separated by the gas/liquid separator) was in the range of 0.42 to 0.72.
As described above, there was a great difference between an actual value and a theoretical expected value of reliquefaction amount depending on the operating conditions of the LNG carrier or the amount of reliquefaction target BOG. If the amount of BOG having failed to be re-liquefied is increased due to poor reliquefaction performance, the BOG needs to be discharged to the outside or to be combusted, which causes waste of energy or a need for a separate reliquefaction cycle. Such a difference between nitrogen and BOG in terms of a degree of similarity of an actual value of reliquefaction amount to a theoretical expected value is thought to be due to difference in properties between nitrogen and BOG.
From the above results, it can be seen that there is a need for a process which can stably maintain reliquefaction performance, regardless of change in operating conditions of an LNG carrier, i.e., change in amount of reliquefaction target BOG.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a BOG reliquefaction method for an LNG vessel having a high-pressure gas injection engine includes: compressing BOG discharged from the storage tank to high pressure and forcing all or some fraction of the high-pressure compressed BOG to exchange heat with BOG discharged from the storage tank; and reducing the pressure of the heat-exchanged high-pressure compressed BOG, wherein the method further includes stably maintaining reliquefaction performance regardless of change in operating conditions of the LNG vessel or change in amount of reliquefaction target BOG.
If an engine provided to the LNG vessel is an engine fueled by BOG at low pressure, such as an X-DF engine, rather than a high-pressure gas injection engine, the BOG reliquefaction method according to embodiments of the present invention is advantageously employed to further compress and re-liquefy surplus BOG among BOG having been compressed to be supplied to the low-pressure engine.
The BOG reliquefaction method is advantageously used when the LNG vessel is operated at a speed of 10 to 17 knots, when a flow rate of BOG used as fuel in the engines (propulsion engine+power generation engine) is in the range of 1,100 kg/h to 2,660 kg/h, when a flow rate of reliquefaction target BOG is in the range of 1,900 kg/h to 3,300 kg/h, or when an amount ratio of reliquefaction target BOG to BOG used as a refrigerant (including the gaseous component separated by the gas/liquid separator) is in the range of 0.42 to 0.72.
In the BOG reliquefaction method, stably maintaining reliquefaction performance includes stably maintaining reliquefaction performance when the heat exchanger has a heat capacity ratio of 0.7 to 1.2.
When the heat capacity ratio is CR, a flow rate of a hot fluid (herein, reliquefaction target BOG) is m1, a specific heat of the hot fluid is c1, a flow rate of a cold fluid (herein, BOG used as the refrigerant) is m2, and a specific heat of the cold fluid is c2, the following equation is satisfied:
CR=(m1×c1)/(m2×c2)
In Experiment 2, it was confirmed that reliquefaction performance fell short of theoretical expected values when the amount of BOG used as the refrigerant (including the gaseous component obtained through the gas/liquid separator) was kept constant and the amount of reliquefaction target BOG was changed, that is, when m2 is kept constant and ml is changed in the above equation. In addition, it was also confirmed that reliquefaction performance fell short of theoretical expected values when the amount of BOG used as the refrigerant (including the gaseous component obtained through the gas/liquid separator) was changed, that is, when m2 is changed in the above equation.
Thus, in the BOG reliquefaction method according to embodiments of the present invention, stably maintaining reliquefaction performance further includes stably maintaining reliquefaction performance when the heat capacity ratio of the heat exchanger is in the range of 0.7 to 1.2 due to change in at least one of the amount of BOG used as the refrigerant (including the gaseous component obtained through the gas/liquid separator) and the amount of reliquefaction target BOG.
In the BOG reliquefaction method, stably maintaining reliquefaction performance further includes allowing the reliquefaction amount to be maintained above 50% of a theoretical expected value under the conditions of Experiment 1. Preferably, the reliquefaction amount is maintained above 60% of the theoretical expected value, more preferably above 70% of the theoretical expected value. If the reliquefaction amount is less than or equal to 50% of the theoretical expected value, there is a problem in that surplus BOG needs to be combusted in a gas combustion unit (GCU) during operation of the LNG vessel under specific operating conditions of the LNG vessel.
From the above results, it can be seen that it is necessary to stably maintain reliquefaction performance regardless of change in operating conditions of the LNG vessel, that is, regardless of change in flow rate of reliquefaction target BOG.
Further, it was found that a heat exchanger including at least two blocks combined together contributes to the significant difference between an actual value and a theoretical expected value of reliquefaction performance.
Examples of a typical heat exchanger used in a BOG reliquefaction system for an LNG vessel include PCHEs, commercially available from KOBELCO Construction Machinery Co., Ltd., Alfa Laval Co., Ltd., Heatric Corporation, and the like. Such a PCHE generally includes at least two diffusion blocks combined together since a single diffusion block has limited capacity.
The diffusion block means a block which constitutes a heat exchanger, especially PCHE (or called DCHE), and exchanges heat of fluid. The diffusion block can be told simply ‘block.’
If the capacity of boil-off gas when it needs to be used by at least two diffusion blocks combined together is ‘A or more and B or less(A˜B)’, A can be one of 1500 kg/h, 2000 kg/h, 2500 kg/h, 3000 kg/h and 3500 kg/h and B can be one of 7000 kg/h, 6000 kg/h, and 5000 kg/h. For example, the capacity of boil-off gas when it needs to be used by at least two diffusion blocks combined together can be 2500 kg/h or more and 5000 kg/h or less (2500 kg/h 5000 kg/h).
Referring to
A hot fluid is supplied into the heat exchanger through the hot fluid inlet pipe 110 and then diffused by the hot fluid inlet header 120 to be sent to the core 190. Then, the hot fluid is cooled in the core 190 through heat exchange with a cold fluid and then collected in the hot fluid outlet header 130 to be discharged to the outside of the heat exchanger through the hot fluid outlet pipe 140.
The cold fluid is supplied into the heat exchanger through the cold fluid inlet pipe 150 and is then diffused by the cold fluid inlet header 160 to be sent to the core 190. Then, the cold fluid is used as a refrigerant in the core 190 to cool the hot fluid through heat exchange and then collected in the cold fluid outlet header 170 to be discharged to the outside of the heat exchanger through the cold fluid outlet pipe 180.
In embodiments of the present invention, a cold fluid used as the refrigerant in a heat exchanger is BOG discharged from a storage tank (including a gaseous component separated by a gas/liquid separator, and a hot fluid cooled in the heat exchanger is compressed reliquefaction target BOG.
In the typical PCHE, the core 190 may include a plurality of diffusion blocks (In
Referring to the graph of
In addition, when BOG is used as a refrigerant, a flow of the refrigerant is likely to be concentrated on any one of the plural diffusion blocks, which has first received the refrigerant, causing the temperature of that diffusion block to become lower than those of the other diffusion blocks.
When concentration of the refrigerant in one diffusion block having first received the refrigerant is combined with reduction in thermal conductivity between the diffusion blocks, there can be a great difference in temperature between the blocks, causing deterioration in reliquefaction performance.
Referring to
The heat exchanger according to this embodiment is characterized by including a means for diffusing a fluid supplied to or discharged from the heat exchanger, specifically a means for resisting a flow of a fluid to diffuse the fluid. Although the perforated panels 210, 220, 230, 240 are shown as the means for diffusing a fluid or the means for resisting a flow of a fluid herein, it should be understood that the means for diffusing a fluid is not limited to the perforated panels.
In this embodiment, each of the perforated panels 210, 220, 230, 240 is a thin plate member having a plurality of holes. Preferably, the first perforated panel 210 has the same cross-sectional size and shape as the hot fluid inlet header 120, the second perforated panel 220 has the same cross-sectional size and shape as the hot fluid outlet header 130, the third perforated panel 210 has the same cross-sectional size and shape as the cold fluid inlet header 160, and the fourth perforated panel 210 has the same cross-sectional size and shape as the cold fluid outlet header 120.
In this embodiment, the plurality of holes formed through each of the perforated panels 210, 220, 230, 240 may have the same cross-sectional area. Alternatively, the plurality of holes may have cross-sectional areas that increase with increasing distance from the pipe 110, 140, 150, or 180 through which a fluid is introduced or discharged.
In addition, the plurality of holes formed through each of the perforated panels 210, 220, 230, 240 may have a uniform density. Alternatively, the plurality of holes may have a density that increases with increasing distance from the pipe 110, 140, 150, or 180 through which a fluid is introduced or discharged. A lower density of the holes indicates a smaller number of holes per unit area.
Preferably, the perforated panels 210, 220, 230, 240 are separated a predetermined distance from the core 190 such that a fluid having passed through the first perforated panel 210 and the third perforated panel 230 toward the core 190 can be effectively diffused and a fluid having been discharged from the core 190 toward the second perforated panel 220 and the fourth perforated panel 240 can be effectively diffused. For example, each of the perforated panels 210, 220, 230, 240 may be separated a distance of 20 mm to 50 mm from the core 190.
The heat exchanger according to this embodiment allows a fluid to be diffused by at least one of the first to fourth perforated panels 210, 220, 230, 240, thereby reducing concentration of a flow of the refrigerant in one of the diffusion blocks.
A heat exchanger according to a second embodiment of the present invention further includes a first partition 230 disposed between the first perforated panel 210 and the core 190, a second partition 320 disposed between the second perforated panel 220 and the core 190, a third partition 330 disposed between the third perforated panel 230 and the core 190, and a fourth partition 340 between the fourth perforated panel 240 and the core 190, in addition to the components of the heat exchanger according to the first embodiment.
In this embodiment, each of the first to fourth partitions 310, 320, 330, 340 serves to prevent a fluid diffused by each of the first to fourth perforated panels 210, 220, 230, 240 from being combined again.
Referring to
Unlike the first partition shown in
When the inner space of the first perforated panel 210 is divided by a grid of crisscrossed bars, as shown in
In addition, dividing the inner space of the first perforated panel 210 by a grid of crisscrossed bars advantageously allows the first perforated panel 210 to remain spaced apart from the core 190. Particularly, it is possible to prevent the first perforated panel 210 from being bent and contacting the core 190 due to the pressure of a fluid passing through the first perforated panel 210. If the first perforated panel 210 contacts the core 190, a fluid is not likely to be properly supplied to the core at the contact portion, causing reduction in heat exchange efficiency.
Referring to
Referring to
Unlike the second partition shown in
When the inner space of the second perforated panel 220 is divided by a grid of crisscrossed bars, as shown in
In addition, dividing the inner space of the second perforated panel 220 by a grid of crisscrossed bars advantageously allows the second perforated panel 220 to remain spaced apart from the core 190. Particularly, it is possible to prevent the second perforated panel 220 from being bent and contacting the core 190 due to the pressure of a fluid passing through the second perforated panel 220. If the second perforated panel 220 contacts the core 190, a fluid is not likely to be properly supplied to the core at the contact portion, causing reduction in heat exchange efficiency.
Referring to
Referring to
Unlike the first partition shown in
When the inner space of the third perforated panel 230 is divided by a grid of crisscrossed bars, as shown in
In addition, dividing the inner space of the third perforated panel 230 by a grid of crisscrossed bars advantageously allows the third perforated panel 230 to remain spaced apart from the core 190. Particularly, it is possible to prevent the third perforated panel 230 from being bent and contacting the core 190 due to the pressure of a fluid passing through the third perforated panel 230. If the third perforated panel 230 contacts the core 190, a fluid is not likely to be properly supplied to the core at the contact portion, causing reduction in heat exchange efficiency.
Referring to
Referring to
Unlike the fourth partition shown in
When the inner space of the fourth perforated panel 240 is divided by a grid of crisscrossed bars, as shown in
In addition, dividing the inner space of the fourth perforated panel 240 by a grid of crisscrossed bars advantageously allows the fourth perforated panel 240 to remain spaced apart from the core 190. Particularly, it is possible to prevent the fourth perforated panel 240 from being bent and contacting the core 190 due to the pressure of a fluid passing through the fourth perforated panel 240. If the fourth perforated panel 240 contacts the core 190, a fluid is not likely to be properly supplied to the core at the contact portion, causing reduction in heat exchange efficiency.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Conversely, in the heat exchanger according to the second embodiment, there is a relatively small difference in temperature between the plural diffusion blocks. Specifically, in the heat exchanger according to the second embodiment, a difference between the maximum value and the minimum value of the graph is in the range of about 40° C. to about 50° C., which is much lower than that in the typical heat exchanger.
According to embodiments of the present invention, when BOG is used as a refrigerant of a heat exchanger and the heat exchanger includes plural diffusion blocks, the refrigerant can be relatively evenly distributed to the diffusion blocks; a difference in temperature between the diffusion blocks can be reduced to increase heat exchange efficiency; and stable reliquefaction performance can be secured regardless of the amount of reliquefaction target BOG.
Each of the perforated panels may be formed of SUS to shrink when BOG at ultra-low temperature, i.e., a refrigerant, contacts the perforated panel and to return to an original shape after the refrigerant leaves the perforated panel. The thin perforated panel has much lower heat capacity than the heat exchanger. If the perforated panel is welded to the heat exchanger, the perforated panel is likely to break since the heat exchanger having higher heat capacity shrinks less when contacting the BOG and the perforated panel having lower heat capacity shrinks more when contacting the BOG.
Thus, it is required that the perforated panel be coupled to the heat exchanger in such a way that thermal expansion and contraction of the perforated panel can be relieved. Now, methods for coupling the perforated panel according to fourth and fifth embodiments of the present invention will be described, which can relieve thermal expansion and contraction of the perforated panel.
Like the heat exchanger according to the first embodiment, a heat exchanger according to this embodiment further includes at least one of the first perforated panel 210 disposed between the hot fluid inlet header 120 and the core 190, the second perforated panel 220 disposed between the hot fluid outlet header 130 and the core 190, the third perforated panel 230 disposed between the cold fluid inlet header 160 and the core 190, and the fourth perforated panel 240 disposed between the cold fluid outlet header 170 and the core 190, in addition to the components of the typical PCHE shown
Referring to
Since the fourth perforated panel 24 is fitted between the two support members 420 not to be securely fixed to the cold fluid outlet header, the fourth perforated plate is prevented from being bent or broken despite suffering from shrinkage due to contact with BOG at ultra-low temperature and a joint between the fourth perforated plate and the cold fluid outlet header can also be prevented from being broken.
Preferably, the support members 420 are as small as possible to the extent that the support members can accommodate shrinkage of the fourth perforated panel 240, and a distance between the support members 420 is as short as possible to the extent that the fourth perforated panel 240 is slightly movable when suffering from shrinkage.
Similarly to the fourth perforated plate 240, the first perforated panel 210 is fitted between two support members separated a predetermined distance from each other and welded to the hot fluid inlet header 120, the second perforated panel 220 is fitted between two support members separated a predetermined distance from each other and welded to the hot fluid outlet header 130, and the third perforated panel 230 is fitted between two support members separated a predetermined distance from each other and welded to the cold fluid inlet header 160.
Like the heat exchanger according to the first embodiment, a heat exchanger according to this embodiment further includes at least one of the first perforated panel 210 disposed between the hot fluid inlet header 120 and the core 190, the second perforated panel 220 disposed between the hot fluid outlet header 130 and the core 190, the third perforated panel 230 disposed between the cold fluid inlet header 160 and the core 190, and the fourth perforated panel 240 disposed between the cold fluid outlet header 170 and the core 190, in addition to the components of the typical PCHE shown
Referring to
The fourth perforated panel 240 according to this embodiment extends parallel to the core 190 at both ends thereof and is stepped away from the core 190. In addition, the fourth perforated panel 240 according to this embodiment is fitted between a single support member 420 and the core 190, rather than being fitted between the two support members 410 as in the third embodiment.
In other words, the single support member 420 is welded to the cold fluid outlet header 170 to be separated a predetermined distance from the core 190 such that both ends of the fourth perforated panel 240 extending parallel to the core 190 are fitted between the support member 420 and the core 190 and the fourth perforated panel 240 is stepped away from the core 190 at a portion thereof inside each of the ends fitted between the support member 420 and the core 190.
Since the fourth perforated panel 24 according to this embodiment is fitted between the support member 420 and the core 190 not to be securely fixed to the cold fluid outlet header 170, the fourth perforated plate is prevented from being bent or broken despite suffering from shrinkage due to contact with BOG at ultra-low temperature, and a joint between the fourth perforated plate and the cold fluid outlet header can also be prevented from breaking.
Preferably, the support member 420 is as small as possible to the extent that the support member can accommodate shrinkage of the fourth perforated panel 240, and a distance between the support member 420 and the core 190 is as short as possible to the extent that the fourth perforated panel 240 is slightly movable when suffering from shrinkage. In addition, preferably, both ends of the fourth perforated panel 240 extending parallel to the core are as short as possible to the extent that the fourth perforated panel can be fitted between the support member 420 and the core 190 and deformation and movement of the fourth perforated panel due to shrinkage is allowable.
Like the fourth perforated panel 240, each of the first to third perforated panels 210, 220, 230 extends parallel to the core 190 at both ends thereof and is stepped away from the core 190. Specifically, the first perforated panel 210 is fitted at both ends thereof between a support member welded to the hot fluid inlet header 120 and the core 190, the second perforated panel 220 is fitted at both ends thereof between a support member welded to the hot fluid outlet header 130 and the core 190, and the third perforated panel 230 is fitted at both ends thereof between a support member welded to the cold fluid inlet header 160 and the core 190.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The channel 198 having a smaller cross-sectional area at the entrance allows a fluid entering the channel to be resisted thereby and flow in a diffused manner, thereby reducing or preventing concentration of supply of the fluid in one of the plural diffusion blocks.
Referring to
As described above, each of the heat exchangers according to the fifth and sixth embodiments of the present invention includes a channel configured to resist a flow of a fluid and thus can reduce or prevent concentration of supply of the refrigerant in one of plural diffusion blocks without a separate member for fluid diffusion.
It should be understood that various modifications, changes, alterations, and equivalent embodiments can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10-2017-0012151 | Jan 2017 | KR | national |