This invention relates to solvent bonding of polymers.
Three-dimensionally patterned polymer structures are presently of interest for various applications (e.g., biological and medical applications). Methods for fabricating such structures have therefore received attention in the art. For example, US 2003/0183982 considers formation of such structures by a three-dimensional printing process. Another example is provided by US 2002/0182241, which considers formation of three-dimensional patterned polymer structures by bonding two-dimensionally patterned polymer layers together. Various bonding techniques are mentioned in this work, including solvent bonding, thermal bonding and plasma bonding.
These bonding methods are well known in the art, and accordingly are not discussed in detail in US 2002/0182241. For example, US 2004/0112518 considers plasma bonding, U.S. Pat. No. 6,652,942 considers solvent bonding, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,258,093 considers thermal bonding. Bonding of patterned polymer layers to create microchannel heat exchangers is considered in U.S. Pat. No. 6,827,128. In this work, thermal bonding is preferred, and it is indicated that solvent bonding is unsuitable. Although it is not stated in this reference why solvent bonding is unsuitable, it is likely that these workers found conventional solvent bonding processes degrade or destroy small features in the micro-patterned layers.
Many variants of solvent bonding are known in the art. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,848,811 considers a self-limiting solvent bonding process to more precisely control application of solvent to parts to be bonded. In U.S. Pat. No. 4,651,382 application of a solvent to parts with a syringe is considered. Another example is provided by U.S. Pat. No. 4,595,446, where application of a solvent as a liquid spray mist is considered. A further example is U.S. Pat. No. 4,512,947, which considers a specialized applicator for solvent application. Yet another example is U.S. Pat. No. 4,256,524, which considers application of a solvent followed by heat and/or pressure to activate the solvent and form a solvent bond.
However, none of these solvent bonding approaches addresses the problem of solvent bonding polymer bodies that have small (e.g., microscopic) features which can easily be damaged by solvent bonding. Accordingly, it would be an advance in the art to provide solvent bonding of micro-patterned polymer objects that does not damage the micro-patterns.
The present invention provides solvent bonding by exposure to a solvent vapor. Vapor phase solvent bonding provides accurate and precise control of the amount of solvent provided to the polymer bodies or objects being bonded. Such precision control of solvent quantity enables solvent bonding to be performed in a manner that does not damage or destroy micro-patterns present in the polymer bodies being bonded. Vapor solvent bonding can be performed in two regimes: saturated and linear. In the saturated regime, the temperature of a polymer body surface is less than the condensation temperature of a polymer vapor. Thus, a liquid condensate will tend to form in this regime. In the linear regime, the temperature of a polymer body surface is greater than the condensation temperature of the solvent vapor. Although a liquid condensate will not form, the polymer surface will be softened by absorbing solvent molecules out of the vapor phase and therefore bonding can still be performed.
a-c show examples of micro-patterned polymers exposed to solvent according to embodiments of the invention.
a-b show an example of polymer bonding according to an embodiment of the invention.
Exposure of a surface of a polymer body to a solvent vapor can take place in either of two regimes: saturated or linear. In the saturated regime, the temperature of the surface of the polymer body is less than or equal to the condensation temperature Tc determined by the partial pressure of the solvent vapor and its chemical composition. Therefore, in the saturated regime, a liquid condensate of solvent tends to form on the surface of the polymer body, since the solvent vapor is saturated (or super-saturated) at the temperature of the polymer surface. The condensation temperature as a function of partial pressure is known for many solvent vapors and can readily be determined by routine measurements if necessary.
In the linear regime, the temperature of the surface of the polymer body is above the condensation temperature Tc and the absorbed amount of solvent is proportional to the partial pressure of the solvent vapor. Accordingly, a liquid solvent condensate will not tend to form on the surface of the polymer, since the solvent vapor is unsaturated at the temperature of the polymer surface but solvent molecules will be absorbed by the polymer. Even though a liquid condensate is not formed on the surface, such exposure can soften polymer body surfaces sufficiently for formation of a solvent bond.
Generally, more solvent is deposited on polymer body surfaces in the saturated regime than in the linear regime. Accordingly, exposure in the saturated regime is preferred for polymer-solvent combinations requiring a relatively large amount of solvent to form the bond. Exposure in the linear regime is preferred for polymer-solvent combinations requiring a relatively small amount of solvent to form the bond. Further process design flexibility is afforded by setting the polymer bodies being bonded to the same temperature or to different temperatures. If the two bodies are at the same temperature, then the solvent vapor exposure is in the same regime (i.e., saturated or linear) at both polymer bodies. If the two polymer bodies are at different temperatures, then the solvent vapor exposure can be in different regimes at the polymer bodies.
The invention can be practiced with any polymer-solvent combination capable of solvent bonding. The polymer bodies being bonded can have the same composition or can have different compositions. Although most of the examples given herein show bonding of two bodies, the invention is also applicable to simultaneous or sequential bonding of three or more polymer bodies. Suitable polymers for practicing the invention include: poly methyl methacrylates; polyethylene; polystyrene; nylons; polyester; polyurethane; polyterafluoroethylene; poly vinyl chloride; poly carbonate; polypropylene; poly vinyl alcohol; poly-lactide; poly-glycolide; poly-dioxanone (PDS); aliphatic poly-ester; poly-caprolactone; poly-anhydrides; poly ortho esters; alkali derivatives of trimethylenecarbonate; δ-valerolactone; β-butyrolactone; γ-butyrolactone; ε-decalactone; hydrocybutyrate; hydroxyvalerate; 1,4-dioxepan-2-one; 1,5,8,12-tetraoxacyclotetradecane-7,14-dione; 1,5-dioxepan-2-one; 6,6-dimethyl-1,4-diocan-2-one; and mixtures or co-polymers thereof.
Suitable solvents for practicing the invention include: 1,4-Dioxane (C4H8O2); 1,1,1,3,3,3-Hexafluoroisopropanol (C3H2F6O); formic acids; ethyl formate; acetic acid; Hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP); cyclic ethers (such as THF, DMF, and PDO); acetone; acetates of C2 to C5 alcohol (such as ethyl acetate and t-butylacetate); glyme; methyl ethyl ketone; dipropyleneglycol methyl ether; lactones; 1,3-diocilane; 1,3-dioxolane2-one; ethyl carbonate; dimethlycarbonate; benzene; toluene; benzyl alcohol; p-xylene; naphthalene; tetrahydrofuran; N-methyl pyrrolidone; dimethylformamide; chloroform; 1,2-dichloromethane; morpholine; dimethylsulfoxide; hexafluoroacetone sesquihydrate (HFAS); anisole; and mixtures thereof.
Pressing the exposed surfaces of the polymer bodies together can be performed in any manner to practice the invention. The force applied during bonding should be large enough to provide consistent bond yield, and small enough not to mechanically damage the polymer bodies and/or any features that may be present on the polymer bodies. Typical bonding forces range from about 0.1 N/cm2 to about 100 N/cm2.
Polymer structures including a vapor exposure solvent bond are also provided by the invention. Due to the precise control of solvent exposure provided by the invention, very shallow and well-defined solvent bonds are provided. More specifically, a depth of the resulting solvent bond in the polymer bodies is preferably between about 10 nm and about 1 μm. Since the preferred solvent bond depth is less than about a micron at each of the bonded surfaces, the invention is especially applicable to bonding of micro-patterned polymer bodies. As indicated above, solvent bonding has not been regarded as suitable for bonding micro-patterned polymers, presumably because of the tendency for exposure to solvent to degrade or even destroy micro-pattern features. However, the solvent exposure accuracy and precision provided by the present invention overcome this problem. Thus micro-patterned polymers (e.g., having feature sizes in a range from about 10 nm to about 400 μm) can be bonded according to the invention without damage to the micro-pattern.
Vapor chamber 206 can be a full enclosure having well-defined inlets and outlets. Alternatively, vapor chamber 206 can be a partial enclosure providing sufficient control of solvent vapor partial pressure. For example, such a partial enclosure can be used on an assembly line where polymer bodies to be bonded are automatically fed to vapor chamber 206 and bonded therein. The choice between a full enclosure and partial enclosure can be made by an art worker upon consideration of tradeoffs involving process speed and control of process parameters.
Relevant process parameters include the temperatures of the surfaces 216 and 218, the exposure time during which these surfaces are exposed to solvent vapor, the time during which the surfaces are pressed together, the pressure with which the surfaces are pressed together, the flow rate of the solvent vapor, the partial pressure of the solvent vapor, and the temperature of vapor chamber 206.
a-c show examples of micro-patterned polymers exposed to solvent according to embodiments of the invention.
a-b show an example of polymers bonded according to an embodiment of the invention.
A noteworthy advantage of solvent bonding according to the present invention is that it can be performed at low temperatures and with a minimal amount of solvent. This advantage is especially relevant for applications dealing with temperature or solvent sensitive materials. Such materials can be the polymers being bonded and/or can be materials within inclusions present in polymer micro-patterns.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 60/554,201, filed Mar. 17, 2004, entitled “3-D Interconnected Multi-Layer Microstructure of Thermoplastic Materials”, and hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60554201 | Mar 2004 | US |