Bone anchors are often used in surgical procedures for fixation. For example, an anchor may be attached to a suture and implanted into bone. After implantation into bone, the anchor engages the bone and resists further movement, providing an anchor point for the attached suture.
The fixation strength of the anchor to the bone is determined by the area of contact between the bone and the anchor and the normal force present there between (i.e., frictional sliding resistance). Assuming a constant normal force, as the contact area is increased, the fixation strength generally increases and vice versa.
In recent years, however, surgeons have been moving towards the use of smaller anchors in surgical repair operations. For example, the use of smaller anchors may be less invasive and allow for more rapid patient healing. With the user of smaller suture anchors, less surface area is available for frictional engagement with the surrounding bone and, thus, lower fixation strength is observed.
Accordingly, as the size of suture anchors decrease, there is a need for improved anchor designs that preserve and/or increase fixation strength with bone when implanted.
In an embodiment, a suture anchor is provided. The suture anchor includes a generally elongated anchor body extending from a proximal end to a distal end along a longitudinal axis, where a distal portion of the anchor body is tapered. The suture anchor further includes an eyelet formed through the anchor body, extending transverse to the longitudinal axis, and dimensioned to receive a suture, a plurality of first channels formed within the outer surface of the anchor body and extending longitudinally along at least a portion of the anchor body, and a plurality of circumferentially spaced ribs defined between the first channels and extending longitudinally along at least a portion of the anchor body length, where a distal end of each rib terminates within the tapered distal portion of the anchor body.
In further embodiments, the suture anchor includes one or more of the following, in any combination.
In an embodiment of the suture anchor, a height of at least two of the plurality of ribs is different.
In an embodiment, the suture anchor further includes a plurality of second channels formed within the surface of the anchor body and extending proximally from the eyelet.
In an embodiment of the suture anchor, each of the plurality of ribs extends distally past the eyelet.
In an embodiment of the suture anchor, a midline of each of the plurality of ribs is separated by an angle selected between about 7 degrees to about 60 degrees.
In an embodiment of the suture anchor, a ratio of height to width of each of the plurality of ribs is selected within the range between about 1:4 to about 20:1.
In an embodiment of the suture anchor, a ratio of the anchor body diameter to the height of each of the plurality of ribs is selected within the range between about 1:2 to about 1:10.
In an embodiment of the suture anchor, the tapered distal portion of the anchor body is selected within the range between about 10% to about 30% of the total anchor body length.
In an embodiment of the suture anchor, a distal terminus of the anchor body is blunt.
In an embodiment of the suture anchor, a distal terminus of the anchor body is sharp.
In an embodiment of the suture anchor, each of the plurality of ribs tapers towards the radial direction and wherein.
In an embodiment of the suture anchor, each of the plurality of ribs radially tapers to a vertex.
In an embodiment of the suture anchor, the anchor body possesses a root mean squared (RMS) surface roughness greater than or equal to 2 micro inches.
In an embodiment, a kit is provided. The kit includes an embodiment of the suture anchor discussed above and at least one of an awl and a drill having a diameter approximately equal to a diameter of the anchor body.
In an embodiment, a suture anchor is provided. The suture anchor includes a generally elongate anchor body core extending from a proximal end to a distal end along a longitudinal axis, where at least a distal end of the anchor body core is tapered. The suture anchor further includes an eyelet formed through the anchor body, extending transverse to the longitudinal axis, and dimensioned to receive a suture and a plurality of circumferentially spaced ribs extending radially outward from the anchor body core, where each of the plurality of ribs extends longitudinally along at least a portion of the anchor body length. A proximal portion of each rib extends proximal to the tapered distal end of the anchor body core, where a distal portion of each of the plurality of ribs is tapered and terminates within the tapered distal end of the anchor body core and where a taper angle of the distal end of each the plurality of ribs is greater than the taper angle of the distal end of the anchor body core.
Embodiments of the suture anchor may include one or more of the following, in any combination.
In an embodiment of the suture anchor, a distal leading edge of each of the plurality of ribs is formed in a knife-edge configuration.
In an embodiment, the suture anchor further includes a plurality of channels formed on the surface of the anchor body core and extending proximally from the eyelet, wherein the width of each channel is dimensioned to receive a suture.
In an embodiment of the suture anchor, the circumferential spacing between each of the plurality ribs is selected within the range between about 7 degrees to about 60 degrees.
In an embodiment of the suture anchor, a ratio of height to width of each of the plurality of ribs is selected within the range between about 1:4 to about 20:1.
In an embodiment of the suture anchor, a ratio of the anchor body diameter to the height of each of the plurality of ribs is selected within the range between about 1:2 to about 1:20.
In an embodiment of the suture anchor, the tapered distal portion of the anchor body is selected within the range between about 10% to about 30% of the total anchor body length.
In an embodiment of the suture anchor, the taper angle of the distal portion of each of the plurality of ribs is selected within the range between about 25 degrees to about 45 degrees.
In an embodiment of the suture anchor, the taper angle of the distal end of the anchor body core is selected within the range between about 5 degrees to about 25 degrees with respect to the longitudinal axis.
In an embodiment, a kit is provided. The kit includes an embodiment of the suture anchor discussed above and at least one of an awl and a drill having a diameter approximately equal to the diameter of the anchor body core.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages will be apparent from the following more particular description of the embodiments, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the embodiments.
With reference to
Embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to bone anchors having improved fixation as compared to conventional bone anchors. For example, as discussed in greater detail below, embodiments of the disclosed bone anchors including an anchor body having a tapered distal end and ribs extending longitudinally along at least a portion of the length of the anchor. The plurality of ribs further extend between the anchor body and the tapered distal tip, where the distal portion of the rib terminates within the tapered distal tip. Such ribs mitigate the plow-out effect, preserving contact between the ribs and the surrounding bone along the length of the anchor and providing increased surface area contact with the bone, improving fixation strength.
In certain embodiments, the ribs are defined by longitudinal channels formed in the anchor body surface. In other embodiments, the ribs extend radially outward from the anchor body surface. In further embodiments, the leading distal edge of the ribs are configured in a tapered “knife-edge” configuration, allowing the distal end of the anchor to cut through the bone more efficiently.
The discussion will now turn to the embodiment of
With reference to
The distal end 202A of the anchor body 202 is further adapted for insertion into bone. For example, as illustrated in
The anchor body 202 further includes a suture eyelet 214. The eyelet 214 extends through the anchor body 202, transverse to its longitudinal axis 204, and is dimensioned to receive a suture. For example, a suture (not shown) may be routed through the eyelet, with free limbs extending adjacent the outer surface of the anchor body. In alternative embodiments, the eyelet may include a bar or other protrusion for securing a suture thereto. In further alternative embodiments, the anchor body is cannulated and suture may be routed through the cannulation, and secured to the bar or protrusion.
With reference to
The first plurality of channels 210 define a plurality of ribs 212 there between that are circumferentially spaced about the anchor body 202. For example, as illustrated in
In alternative embodiments of the anchor 200′, illustrated in
In further embodiments, illustrated in
The cross-sectional area of each of the plurality of ribs 212, 212′ is further defined by the channels 210, 210′, respectively. For example, as illustrated in
In an embodiment, the channels 210, 210′ extend along at least a portion of the length of the anchor 200, where a distal end of each rib 212, 212′ terminates within the tapered distal portion 206. For example, as illustrated in
As further illustrated in
In certain embodiments, at least two of the plurality of channels 210, 210′ are of different depth. For example, as illustrated in
Viewed end-on, as illustrated in
The circumferential spacing of the ribs 212 is variable, as necessary, by positioning of the channels. For example, a midline 254 of each rib is taken as the center point along the rib width 252. The rib spacing is defined by an angle 256 between adjacent midlines 254. In certain embodiments, the separation angle is selected between about 7 degrees to about 60 degrees.
The discussion will now turn to
With further reference to
The anchor 400 is further adapted for insertion into bone. For example, as illustrated in
The anchor body 402 further includes a suture eyelet 414. The eyelet 414 extends through the anchor body 402, transverse to the longitudinal axis 404, and is dimensioned to receive a suture. For example, in use, a suture (not shown) may be routed through the eyelet, with free limbs extending adjacent the outer surface of the anchor body. In alternative embodiments, the eyelet may include a bar or other protrusion for securing a suture thereto. In further alternative embodiments, the anchor body is cannulated and suture may be routed through the cannulation, and secured to the bar or protrusion.
In an embodiment, a plurality of channels 416 (e.g., a pair of channels) is also formed in the outer surface of the anchor core 410, extending proximally from proximal ends of the eyelet, approximately parallel to the longitudinal axis 412. A width and depth of the channels 416 is dimensioned to receive a suture therein. In alternative embodiments, the channels may be omitted.
With reference to
As illustrated in the embodiment of
As further illustrated in
In further embodiments, a rib taper angle of the distal rib portion 412A is greater than a taper angle of the core 410. For example, the rib taper angle may be selected within the range between about 25 degrees to about 45 degrees, while the core taper angle may be selected within the range between about 5 degrees to about 25 degrees.
In further embodiments, a leading distal edge of the tapered portion 412A of the ribs 412 may include laterally tapered surfaces. This lateral taper, also referred to as a “knife edge” configuration, facilitates insertion of the ribs 412 into bone by gradually increasing the surface area of each rib in contact with the bone. As a result, the structurally intact bone surrounding the anchor is able to generate a greater reaction force against the surface of the inserted anchor. This greater reaction force in turn translates into increased contact pressure which in turn translates into increased anchor fixation strength.
Viewed end-on, as illustrated in
The circumferential spacing of the ribs 412 is also variable, as necessary. For example, a midline 454 of each rib may be taken as the center point along the rib width 462. The rib spacing may be defined by an angle 456 between adjacent midlines 454. In certain embodiments, the separation angle may be selected between about 7 degrees to about 60 degrees.
The discussion will now turn to
In further embodiments, the fixation strength of embodiments of the disclosed anchors (e.g., 200, 200′, 400) are enhanced by texturing the outer surface. For example, as illustrated in
To examine the fixation strength of embodiments of the anchor discussed herein, as compared to existing suture anchors, pullout tests were performed. Each anchor possessed a diameter of 5.5 mm. A first comparative suture anchor, possessed circumferential ribs and was tested 5 times. A second comparative suture anchor possessed laterally protruding wings and was tested 5 times. A third comparative suture anchor possessed helical threads and was tested 20 times. An embodiment of the suture anchor 400 of
It may be observed from the plot of
This force reduction improves the likelihood that, during insertion, the structural integrity of bone adjacent to the anchor is maintained. With the integrity of the bone adjacent to the anchor preserved, in combination with the increased contact area, between the anchor and bone maximized, fixation strength is further improved.
One skilled in the art will realize the invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The foregoing embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects illustrative rather than limiting of the invention described herein. Scope of the invention is thus indicated by the appended claims, rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5505735 | Li | Apr 1996 | A |
5522843 | Zang | Jun 1996 | A |
5733307 | Dinsdale | Mar 1998 | A |
5948000 | Larsen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6508830 | Steiner | Jan 2003 | B2 |
7217279 | Reese | May 2007 | B2 |
7320701 | Haut et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7914539 | Stone et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8409251 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20050107828 | Reese | May 2005 | A1 |
20050149024 | Ferrante | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070073299 | Dreyfuss et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070118229 | Bergin | May 2007 | A1 |
20070198017 | Tschakaloff et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080109038 | Steiner et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080167660 | Moreau et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090076544 | DiMatteo et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082806 | West, Jr. et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090149856 | Paakinaho | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100217266 | Helevirta | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100029273 | Hirotsuka et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20120203340 | Choinski et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120245631 | Lunn et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120296345 | Wack | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130023929 | Sullivan et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130096611 | Sullivan | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130103083 | Baird | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130144334 | Bouduban et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130267998 | Vijay et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140214152 | Bielefeld | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150080972 | Chin | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9729693 | Aug 1997 | WO |
0030552 | Jun 2000 | WO |
2000030552 | Jun 2000 | WO |
2002005718 | Jan 2002 | WO |
2013114347 | Aug 2013 | WO |
1997029693 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2014018946 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2014189605 | Nov 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Suture anchor BIORAPTOR(TM), downloaded from www.medicalexpo.com on Oct. 18, 2013. |
Suture anchor HITCH, downloaded from www.medicalexpo.com on Oct. 18, 2013. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for related International Application No. PCT/US2015/065287 dated Mar. 16, 2016. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for related International Application No. PCT/US2015/065203 dated Mar. 16, 2016. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for related International Application No. PCT/US2015/065212 dated Mar. 16, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from related International Application No. PCT/US2015/065287 dated May 31, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from related International Application No. PCT/US2015/065203 dated May 24, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from related International Application No. PCT/US2015/065212 dated May 30, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from related PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/065203 dated Jun. 13, 2017. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from related PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/065287 dated Jun. 13, 2017. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from related PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/065212 dated Jun. 13, 2017. |
Chinese Application No. 201580067336.2 First Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2018. |
Chinese Search Report for Application No. 201580067336.2. |
European Search Report for Application No. 19161652.3-1122 dated Aug. 5, 2019. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection Office Action—Application No. 2017-531221 dated Aug. 26, 2019. |
Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2015360315 dated Aug. 23, 2019. |
Chinese Second Office Action—Application No. 201580067336.2 dated Aug. 21, 2019. |
Chinese Search Report—Application No. 201580067336.2. |
Office action issued in corresponding Chinese application No. 201580067336.2 dated Mar. 30, 2020. |
Search report issued with office action in corresponding Chinese application No. 20150067336.2 dated Mar. 30, 2020. |
Office action issued in corresponding Japanese application No. 2017-531221 dated Feb. 17, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160166245 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |