1. The Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to soft tissue repair surgery, such as rotator cuff repair surgery. More specifically, the present invention relates to bone anchors for attaching soft tissue to bone using a suture.
2. Related Technology
Soft tissue injuries, especially rotator cuff injuries, can occur from repeated stress or acute trauma. The rotator cuff is a group of muscles and tendons in the shoulder that attach to the humerus bone of the arm. The rotator cuff allows a person to rotate the arm and raise it above the head. A common injury to the rotator cuff occurs when repeated stress or acute trauma causes the rotator cuff to partially or complete tear away from the humerus bone. These and similar types of injuries may require surgery to correctly reattach the soft tissue to the bone.
Various devices have been used to reattach soft tissue to bone. Known methods include staples, wedges, inserts, screws, and sutures alone. Threaded suture anchors, such as bone screws, have recently been developed to provide a particularly firm location where a suture can be anchored to bone. In these systems, a suture is tied between the bone anchor and soft tissue. Providing a firm attachment point for the suture is important because of the relatively strong forces that are experienced in a flexing muscle.
Despite recent advances in bone anchors, existing bone anchors and rotator cuff repairs can fail and have other disadvantages. Typically, a rotator cuff repair fails either because the bone anchor dislodges or the suture tears through the soft tissue. As force is applied to the suture, the suture can cut through the soft tissue like a cheese wire, leaving the rotator cuff detached from the humerus bone. When one suture fails, it can place more stress on the surrounding sutures, thus increasing the likelihood that other sutures will fail in like manner.
Using a greater number of sutures per unit area of soft tissue can minimize suture attachment failure. However, the number of sutures that can be used in a particular procedure is limited by the number of bone anchors that can be used and the number of sutures per anchor. During a surgical procedure, the bone anchors are placed in the humerus bone where the tissue has torn away. Thus, the number of bone anchors is limited to the number of anchors that will fit in the repair area without compromising the integrity of the humerus bone. In most rotator cuff repair surgeries, this number is two or three anchors.
The number of sutures that can be attached to each bone anchor depends on the configuration of the bone anchor. Double loading of bone anchors has been achieved for some bone anchors and is currently preferred over single loading. Typically these bone anchors have an eyelet or loop and the sutures are attached by threading the sutures through the eyelet or loop.
Loading multiple sutures on an eyelet or loop is problematic because it can cause “suture capture.” During a rotator cuff repair procedure, a practitioner typically ties a knot that can be adjusted by sliding. To properly tie and adjust the knot, the suture must be able to slide in the bone anchor. Multiple sutures loaded on an eyelet or loop create friction and/or pinching that can prevent the suture from sliding in the bone anchor (i.e. causes “suture capture”). Suture capture occurs most often at the point where the sutures are sliding on the eyelet or loop of the bone anchor and after the first suture has been tied. If a first suture is tied with it crossing over an untied suture the first suture can cause friction and/or pinch the second suture against the eyelet or loop, thereby causing suture capture. As the number of sutures increases the likelihood of suture capture also increases.
Suture capture can be particularly disruptive to a surgical procedure. In many cases, if a suture becomes captured the suture can break when the practitioner attempts to adjust the knot. Because the bone anchors are small and the bone anchor is in the bone of a human when the suture breaks, it is not possible for the practitioner to thread the bone anchor with a new suture. Furthermore, it is very undesirable to remove the bone anchor once it is in place, especially if one of the sutures in the anchor has already been tied. In such cases, the bone anchor is typically left in place with only one suture. The reduced number of sutures places more strain on the soft tissue, which can increase the risk of tissue failure.
Recently, bone anchors that are less likely to cause suture capture have been developed. These anchors have two separate attachment sites inside a longitudinal bore. Attaching sutures within a longitudinal bore is particularly advantageous because it allows the bone anchor to be fully threaded (fully threaded bone anchors have threads near the proximal end that can be embedded in hard cortical bone). However, attaching sutures at different locations inside a longitudinal bore is very difficult due to size restraints. The outer diameter of a bone anchor is typically between 5.0 mm and 7.0 mm. This maximum outer diameter limits the bore diameter to between about 2.5 and 4.0 mm. Due to these size restraints, exiting bone anchors have been limited to a maximum load of two sutures.
The bone anchors of the present invention overcome the disadvantages of the prior art discussed above by providing improved suture attachment sites for engaging bone tissue. In an exemplary embodiment, the bone anchors of the present invention have an anchor body extending between a proximal end and a distal end. The anchor body has a longitudinal bore that opens at the proximal end of the anchor body. At least three attachment sites are positioned within the bore. Each attachment site is capable of slidably receiving a respective suture thereon. The three attachment sites are spaced apart and configured such that the portions of the respective sutures that are in contact with the three attachment sites are maintained separated during use.
In a first embodiment, the three attachment sites are formed by placing two or more transverse pins (e.g. an upper pin and a lower pin) across the longitudinal bore. The pins are placed offset from one another such that two pins together provide three separate attachment sites. To load three sutures on the two pins, a first suture is looped on the lower pin with both ends of the suture passing by one side of the upper pin. A second suture is looped on the lower pin with both ends of the suture passing on the opposite side of the upper pin. The lower pin provides two separate attachments sites when used in combination with an upper pin because the upper pin can maintain separation between the two sutures looped on the lower pin (i.e. by passing the ends of respective sutures on opposite sides of the upper pin. A third suture attachment site is provided by the upper pin.
In a second embodiment the bone anchor comprises an anchor body having a bore that opens at a distal end of a threaded portion (in addition to the opening at the proximal end of the anchor body). A longitudinal pin is configured to be inserted into the opening at the distal end. The portion of the longitudinal pin that is inserted into the bore includes three or more suture attachment sites. In one embodiment, the inserted portion (i.e. the insert) of the longitudinal pin has two or more protrusions and one or more holes to provide three or more attachment sites for attaching sutures. The three or more attachment sites are configured to maintain the sutures separated at the point where the sutures are in contact with their respective attachment sites.
In the first and second embodiments, the attachment sites are typically formed deep within the bore to allow room for a socket to be formed in the proximal end of the anchor body. This feature allows a driver tool to be inserted for driving the bone anchor into a bone. Because the driver tool is placed on the interior of the bone anchor, the anchor body can be threaded to the proximal end. Threading the proximal end of the anchor body provides the bone anchor with the ability to better engage the cortical bone near the surface of the bone.
Providing three separate attachment sites within the bore of the bone anchors of the present invention provides several advantages not available to bone anchors with one or two sutures. Importantly, the use of three sutures can improve the success of reparatory surgery on tissue that is weak and susceptible to tearing by increasing the number of sutures per unit area. The use of a three sutures allows forces per unit area to be reduced by 67% compared to a single suture and 33% compared to a two suture anchor.
It has also been found that the use of three sutures can be beneficial even in the case where a patient's tissue is adequate to hold with only two sutures per bone anchor. The third suture can be advantageously used as a reserve in case there is a problem with one of the first two sutures, (e.g. the suture breaks, the suture is poorly placed, or a knot is loose). If the third suture is not needed, it can be easily removed. A third suture can be beneficial if a practitioner decides during an operation that the tissue needs one additional suture. If the bone anchor has a reserve suture, the practitioner can place the additional suture without adding an additional anchor. In some cases, the practitioner may want to place an odd number of sutures. Bone anchors that provide three sutures allow the practitioner to place 5 sutures, for example, using two anchors.
In another aspect of the present invention, the bone anchors can have a non-threaded portion at the distal end to form a stabilizing extension. The extension provides additional stability to the bone anchor by reducing the tendency of the anchor body to move or rotate laterally. Bone anchors are often placed in a bone at an angle. Much like a longer tent stake is less likely to give out, the extension of the bone anchor of the present invention helps prevent the bone anchor from becoming dislodged. Stabilizing the bone anchor reduces the likelihood that the bone anchor will fail and allows the bone anchor to be safely loaded with more sutures.
In yet another aspect of the invention, the anchor body is a screw that includes a portion of fine threads and a portion of coarse threads. The fine threads are configured to engage hard bone tissue, such as cortical bone, and the coarse threads are configured to engage soft bone tissue, such as cancellous bone. A portion of the threads are made finer by increasing the root diameter and increasing the surface angle of the thread. The pitch of the coarse threads and fine threads is kept the same such that the proximal threads can follow the impression created by the distal threads as the bone anchor is driven into a bone.
Optimizing the thread pattern for engaging different types of bone tissue allows the bone anchor to better engage adjacent bone tissue. Because the bone anchor can better engage adjacent bone tissue, the bone anchor can be loaded with additional sutures without compromising stability of the bone anchor. The additional sutures per anchor reduce the stress placed on each individual suture through the soft tissue, which helps prevent the sutures from cutting through the soft tissue.
These and other objects and features of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims.
To further clarify the above and other advantages and features of the present invention, a more particular description of the invention will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is appreciated that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope. The invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
With reference to
Proximal end 14 includes an opening 30, which provides access to a hollow interior bore 30 of anchor body 12. A hex socket 22 is formed in bore 30 of anchor body 12, which allows bone anchor 10 to be driven into a bone using a hex driver. It will be appreciated that bore 30 of anchor body 12 can have nay other desired shape, such as triangular, square, pentagonal, star-shaped, oval, etc. Transverse pins 23a and 23b are disposed through anchor body 12 and provide attachment points for looping sutures thereon.
Bone anchor 10 has threads 20 that wrap continuously around anchor body 12 in a desired (e.g., clockwise) direction. The pattern of threads 20 determines in part how bone anchor 10 engages surrounding bone tissue. In one embodiment, threads 20 make about six turns around anchor body 12 and extend toward proximal end 16.
As shown in
Anchor body 12 also has a non-threaded portion at distal end 16, which forms stabilizing extension 18. Stabilizing extension 18 is generally cylindrical and typically has a width less than root diameter 26. In one embodiment, the length of extension 18 is more than about 20% of the length of the threaded portion of anchor body 10. In another embodiment, extension 18 is more than 100% the length of the threaded portion and in yet another embodiment, more than about 200% of the length of the threaded portion.
In one embodiment, extension 18 is configured to be inserted into a pilot hole drilled into the bone where bone anchor 10 is to be placed. Preparing a pilot hole reduces the risk that insertion of the screw in a bone will cause damage to bone anchor 10 and/or fracture bone tissue as the bone anchor 10 is inserted into the bone. Preventing damage to bone anchor 10 and surrounding bone tissue reduces the chances that bone anchor 10 will become loosened or fail during use. In another embodiment, the bone anchor can have a self drilling distal end.
Anchor body 12 is advantageously made from a strong biocompatible material, such as a titanium alloy or stainless steel. Alternatively, anchor body 12 can be made from a biodegradable material, such as poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA) that can be absorbed into adjacent bone tissue over time as the repair site heals. Other biocompatible and/or biodegradable materials suitable for use in bone anchors are known to those skilled in the art.
Bore 30 opens at proximal end 14 to provide access to the interior of anchor body 12. In an exemplary embodiment, a proximal portion of bore 30 is hexagonally shaped to form a hex socket 22 for receiving a hex driver. This female type driver tool engagement mechanism eliminates the need to have a protruding proximal end 16. Instead, proximal end 16 is substantially flat and can be placed at or just below a bone surface, as discussed more fully below.
As shown in
The distal portion of bore 30 also contains one or more transverse pins for looping sutures thereon. Pins 23a and 23b are formed or inserted in anchor body 12 lying across bore 30. The diameter of pins 23a and 23b are selected such that there is sufficient space between pin 23a and pin 23b and interior surface 28 for passing a suture around the pins 23a and 23b. In addition to providing a location for looping sutures, pins 23a and 23b provide additional structural support (i.e., an endoskeleton) to anchor body 12.
Pins 23a and 23b are disposed in bore 30 substantially non-parallel to each other. As illustrated in
Bone anchor 10, in
Another advantageous feature of pins 23a and 23b is their position distal to hex socket 22 and within bore 30. Pins 23a and 23b are placed within bore 30 such that the forces applied by sutures 36 are transferred to a more central location within anchor body 12. Forces applied to bone anchor 10 below the surface of a bone are less likely to cause bone anchor 10 to become loosened or dislodged. Pins 23a and 23b are placed below hex socket 22 so a hex driver can be inserted without hitting the pins. This placement also allows sutures to be threaded through a hole in a driver tool (not shown) so that bone anchor 10 can be installed pre-loaded with sutures.
While bone anchor 10 has been illustrated with two pins (i.e., pins 23a and 23b), bone anchor 10 may have more or fewer pins depending on the required number of sutures and/or the space available within bore 30 for placing more sutures. For instance, in another embodiment, the anchor body 10 may have a single post with one or more sutures loaded thereon. Furthermore, a second pin can be disposed in bore 30 even where sutures are to be placed only on one pin, with the second pin being used solely to separate sutures. In addition, a second pin can be placed in anchor body 12 for structural support only.
Pins 23a and 23b are made from a strong metal or synthetic fiber so as to provide a ridged attachment point for sutures 36. In an exemplary embodiment, pins 23a and 23b are cylindrical to provide a smooth surface for sutures 36 to slide against. While pins 23a and 23b are illustrated as straight, pins 23a and 23b can be bent or have shapes other than cylindrical. Straight pins, however, can be more easily placed in anchor body 12 and therefore can reduce the cost and complexity of manufacturing bone anchor 10. The foregoing and similar attachment devices are examples of rigid attachment means for attaching a suture to an anchor.
In one embodiment, one or both of pins 23a and 23b are made from a radioopaque material such as titanium or stainless steel. A radioopaque pin can be used with a radiotransparent anchor body, such as an anchor body made from a biodegradable material such as PLLA. This configuration of materials allows a practitioner to identify and locate bone anchor 10 in a radiograph when bone anchor 10 is made mostly of biodegradable materials.
The bone anchor according to the present invention need not be formed as a threaded device, but can also be formed as a tap-in type anchor. Also, the measurements, angles and ratios between the dimensions of the bone anchor can be varied from those described above and in the following alternative embodiment so as to be suitable for the conditions and applications in which the bone anchor is to be used.
Fine threads 38 are finer because they have a wider root diameter 46. Root diameter 46 of fine thread 38 is wider than root diameter 48 of coarse threads even after subtracting out the increase in width due to the overall taper of anchor body 12 as illustrated by lines 44a and 44b. Fine threads 38 have root diameter 46 and a major diameter 42 that are configured to engage harder bone. Coarse threads 40 have a root diameter 48 and major diameter 42 that are configured to engage soft bone. In an exemplary embodiment, major diameter 42 is about 5.3 mm. root diameter 46 is about 4.8 mm and root diameter 48 is about 3.3 mm. Fine threads 38 can have a similar shape as coarse threads 40 or a different shape as desired. For example, fine threads 38 can have a larger or smaller thread angle.
In one embodiment, fine threads 38 have the same pitch as coarse threads 40. By keeping the pitch the same between thread sections, the finer threads 38 will be able to use the same impression cut by coarse threads 40.
In manufacturing bone anchor 10, in accordance with the present invention, anchor body 12 and posts 23 can be cast and formed in a die. Alternatively anchor body 12 can be cast or formed and posts 23a and 23b inserted later. For instance, anchor body 12 can be cast and formed from PLLA. Anchor body 12 can then be drilled to prepare holes for stainless steel pins 23a and 23b.
The suture anchors according to the present invent can be distributed to practitioners with one or more of sutures 36 threaded through bore 30 and looped to pins 23a and/or 23b. In one method of manufacturing bone anchor 10, sutures 36 are looped on pins 23a and 23b as pins 23a and 23b are inserted into anchor body 12.
An example of a type of suture suitable for use in conjunction with the bone anchor of the present invention is #2 braided polyester. If more than one strand of sutures 36 is used, the sutures can be a different color such that a practitioner can more easily pair the ends of the sutures during a surgical operation.
Because bone anchor 10 is placed in humerus bone 54 at an angle, extension 18 provides a mechanical advantage against bone anchor 10 moving laterally and opening the angle to the tangent. By preventing lateral movement, extension 18 prevents sutures 36 from loosening once sutures 36 have been properly tied. In addition, if bone anchor 10 were to move within bone 54, bone anchor 10 can become dislodged and fail. Extension 18 does not have threads thereon, which reduce friction as bone anchor 10 is driven into a pilot hole.
Proximal end 14 of bone anchor 10 is substantially flat or non-protruding such that bone anchor 10 can be placed at or just below the surface of bone 54. Threads extend to proximal end 14 such that bone anchor 10 has maximum engagement with bone 54. The opening at proximal end 14 also allows for sutures 36 to exit the bore. The opening of the bore is smooth such that sutures 36 can easily slide thereon.
Sutures 36 exit bone anchor 10 at proximal end 14 and are drawn through the soft tissue of rotator cuff 56. Sutures 36 can be spaced to more evenly distribute the load exerted by rotator cuff 56. As shown in
Longitudinal pin 162 includes a portion that forms an insert 166 that is configured to be received in the opening of distal end 164. Insert 166 of pin 162 includes three attachment sites for looping three respective sutures thereon. Two attachment sites are provided by protrusions 168a and 168b (collectively protrusions 168). A third attachment site is provide by a transverse hole 170.
While protrusions 168 have been shown having a diameter smaller than the diameter of bore 130 at distal end 164, protrusions 168 can be made wider by providing a keyway that receives the protrusions as the insert 166 is received into bore 130.
Longitudinal pin 162 is also configured to engage threaded portion 160 to prevent the insert 166 from being pulled completely through bore 130. In the embodiment shown in
If desired, longitudinal pin 162 can be permanently or temporarily fixed to threaded portion 160 so as to prevent pin 162 from falling out of bore 130 (i.e. movement in the longitudinal direction) and/or from rotating within bore 130. Any mechanism can be used for preventing such movement so long as it does not disrupt the spacing in bore 130 that allows sutures 136 to freely slide. In one embodiment, pin 162 can be fixed using an adhesive. Alternatively the distal end of threaded portion 160 can interlock with tip 178 to provide a mechanical restriction to rotation.
Protrusion 168b is also spaced apart from tip 178 and central portion 178 provides a barrier between protrusion 168a and 168b. If desired, spacers 172 can be placed between protrusions 168a and 168b to prevent sutures 136a and 136b from coming into contact.
The spacing and arrangement of central portion 178, protrusions 168, wall 174 and tip 176 allow sutures 136a and 136b to freely slide in bore 130 and maintain the sutures separated from one another along the portion of the sutures that are in contact with protrusions 168. As can be seen in
If desired, a second transverse hole can be made through central portion 174 to allow for placement of a fourth suture. In a preferred embodiment, this transverse hole is placed at a 90 degree angle to hole 170 such that the exits of this hole are positioned over spacers 172.
Protrusions 168 and spacers 172 can take any desired shape so long as the combination of protrusions and spacers allows sufficient space for a suture to be looped on the protrusion 168 and slide without being captured.
Bone anchor 100 can also include any of the features described above with respect to bone anchor 10. For example, bone anchor 100 can have fine and coarse threads, and extension, be made of a bioabsorbable material, and or have other similar features.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/317,204, filed Dec. 22, 2005, entitled “Bone Anchors For Use In Attaching Soft Tissue To Bone,” now issued U.S. Pat. No. 8,114,127, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/873,987, filed Jun. 22, 2004, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 7,322,978, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3861269 | Laverty | Jan 1975 | A |
4632100 | Somers et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
5019079 | Ross | May 1991 | A |
5156616 | Meadows et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5370662 | Stone et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5505736 | Reimels et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5571139 | Jenkins, Jr. | Nov 1996 | A |
5573547 | LaVeen et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5573548 | Nazre et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5575801 | Habermeyer et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5584835 | Greenfield | Dec 1996 | A |
5702397 | Goble et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5733307 | Dinsdale | Mar 1998 | A |
5743914 | Skiba | Apr 1998 | A |
5814070 | Borzone et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824011 | Stone et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5851219 | Goble et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5868789 | Huebner | Feb 1999 | A |
5891168 | Thal | Apr 1999 | A |
5895351 | Nottage et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904704 | Goble et al. | May 1999 | A |
5935129 | McDevitt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5957953 | DiPoto et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961524 | Crombie | Oct 1999 | A |
5964783 | Grafton et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6027523 | Schmieding | Feb 2000 | A |
6045573 | Wenstrom, Jr. et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6096060 | Fitts et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123711 | Winters | Sep 2000 | A |
6139565 | Stone et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149653 | Deslauriers | Nov 2000 | A |
6159235 | Kim | Dec 2000 | A |
6214031 | Schmieding et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6264677 | Simon et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6319270 | Grafton et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6436124 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6464706 | Winter et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6508830 | Steiner | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6511499 | Schmieding et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6547564 | Hansson | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554852 | Oberlander | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6569186 | Winters et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6569188 | Grafton et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6610080 | Morgan | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6616665 | Grafton et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6623492 | Berube et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6641596 | Lizardi et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6648892 | Martello | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652563 | Dreyfuss | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6660023 | McDevitt et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6666877 | Morgan et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6699250 | Osterle et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6743233 | Baldwin et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6840953 | Martinek | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6923824 | Morgan et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7322478 | Goto et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7322978 | West | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7588587 | Barbieri et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
8114127 | West | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8343186 | Dreyfuss et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20010004694 | Carchidi et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010037113 | Justin | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010053913 | Freedland | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020016594 | Schlapfer et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020052629 | Morgan et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020128684 | Foerster | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147463 | Martinek | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173822 | Justin et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183751 | Justin et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004545 | Burkhart et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030065332 | TenHuisen et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030065361 | Dreyfuss | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074002 | West, Jr. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088252 | Kaikkonen et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030125745 | Tseng et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144696 | Sinnott et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030158555 | Sanders et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030187446 | Overaker et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030187477 | Lintner | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040133239 | Singhatat | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050119698 | Martinek | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050222618 | Dreyfuss et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050283158 | West | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060100630 | West | May 2006 | A1 |
20120065677 | West | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130013064 | West | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 705 572 | May 1995 | EP |
1 584 296 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1 588 666 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1260182 | Nov 2007 | EP |
HEI 10-507398 | Aug 1998 | JP |
WO 9706731 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 0069352 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0211630 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 2004047617 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2005102190 | Mar 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated Apr. 17, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/873,987. |
Notice of Allowanced dated Sep. 20, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/873,987. |
Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2010 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 11/317,204. |
Final Office Action dated May 6, 2010 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 11/317,204. |
Office Action dated Dec. 8, 2010 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 11/317,204. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2011 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 11/317,204. |
Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2011 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 11/317,204. |
Notice of Allowanced dated Oct. 24, 2011 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 11/317,204. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/075,771, filed Nov. 8, 2013, West. |
Barber, F.A., et al., Sutures and Suture Anchors: Update 2003, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 19, No. 9 Nov. 2003: pp. 985-990. |
Barber, F.A., et al., Sutures and Suture Anchors—Update 2006, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 22, No. 10 Oct. 2006: pp. 1063-1069. |
Office Action cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,913, dated May 14, 2014. |
Office Action cited in U.S. Appl. No. 13/616,623, dated Mar. 27, 2014. |
Office Action cited in U.S. Appl. No. 14/075,771, dated Mar. 27, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120143250 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11317204 | Dec 2005 | US |
Child | 13351460 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10873987 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 11317204 | US |