The invention relates to the field of medical devices for use in biopsy procedures. In particular, the invention pertains to a bone marrow biopsy device and method for obtaining bone marrow samples therewith.
Biopsy samples from bone tissue are typically collected from a sampling site in a patient by the use of bone biopsy devices. Typical bone biopsy devices include a hollow cannula which surrounds a stylet. The style includes a sharp distal tip which extends distally beyond the tip of the hollow cannula when the stylet is secured within the cannula. The combined cannula and stylet is used to penetrate through the cortex or outer layer of bone so as to sample the softer tissue or marrow within the bone. Once the cannula and stylet have penetrated into the bone, the stylet is removed and the cannula further advanced into the bone to capture a marrow sample.
The architecture of the tissue sample is important in several respects. Initially, the size of the sample is important, with larger sample sizes representing better samples for subsequent testing to be performed on the tissue. The larger the cannula and stylet which is used, however, the more pain is generated at the penetration site for the patient. Another aspect of sampling is minimizing damage to the sample, such as compressive forces, during sampling and removal.
A variety of bone biopsy devices have been proposed to improve the biopsy sampling procedure. Andelin et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,110,128, Guirtino et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,615,690 and Mittermeier et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,063,037 describe a biopsy devices with structural features designed to enhance sample retention. Other bone biopsy devices have been developed which aid in the preservation of sample integrity by virtue of their structure. One such device is described in Krueger et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6, 443,910, which includes a sampling cannula having a “cutting finger” on the distal portion of the cannula.
Difficulty has been encountered in the art in the balancing between the structural requirements of bone biopsy devices and desirable sampling attributes. Providing bone biopsy devices that consistently sample without damaging forces being exerted upon the sample has proven challenging. Furthermore, accommodating patient comfort by reducing the need for multiple site sampling has presented another challenge. Preserving the architecture of the sample during its obtaining and removal presents yet another factor to be balanced in bone biopsy devices.
There is a need in the field of medical bone biopsy devices for biopsy devices which facilitate the retention of the obtained sample while at the same time preserving the structural integrity of the sample and reducing the amount of trauma to the patient.
The invention provides for a bone marrow biopsy device, specifically a sampling cannula, having structural features which improve the ability to sever and retain a relatively large marrow sample. It has been discovered that a sampling cannula can be constructed which affords the benefits of obtaining a relatively long core of bone tissue sample and enhancing the retention of the sample within the cannula while at the same time preserving the structural integrity of the sample. In particular, it has been discovered that a bone marrow sampling cannula having the advantages of an open trough-like distal structure can comprise both a friction-enhancing interior surface texture and wall openings which facilitate sample retention without substantially damaging the biological “architecture” of the core sample.
The invention provides for a sampling cannula for use in bone marrow biopsy system comprising:
In a preferred embodiment, the trough portion comprises a plurality of wall openings. In another preferred embodiment, each wall opening comprise a substantially rectangular shape.
The invention further provides for a bone marrow biopsy system comprising:
In a preferred embodiment, the distal tip of the trough portion of the sampling cannula resides within the outer cannula such that the trough portion distal tip terminates proximal to the distal tip of the outer cannula. The bone marrow biopsy system can further comprise an ejector rod.
As used herein, the terms “trough” and “trough-like” as used to describe a structural feature of the device of the invention, are meant to describe a cannula structure having an open segment at which the interior surface of the cannula is exposed through an elongated, generally linear open region on the opposite side from an intact portion.
The term “substantially rectangular” as used to refer to a wall opening of the sampling cannula is intended to encompass variations of length, width, and overall shape provided there is an overall longitudinal dimension of such opening.
Referring to
The dimensions of the cannula 10 and trough 13 can vary according to the nature of the sampling site and/or desired sample size. The cannula cross-sectional diameter of the device can vary provided the device can effectively obtain and retain a sample within. For example, 8 gauge, 11 gauge or 13 gauge sizes can be used. For a given combination of dimensions and materials to be used, the hoop strength of the trough portion, i.e., structural integrity of the intact cross-sectional circumference of the intact portion of the cannula body, must be maintained to an extent sufficient to withstand the physical forces exerted upon it during the penetration and sampling stages of the bone marrow biopsy procedure.
The length of the trough portion 13 can vary according to the sample size desired provided the structural integrity of the device is not adversely compromised when sampling forces are exerted upon it. In a preferred embodiment, the trough portion 13 can have a length of up to about 4 cm. Most preferably, the length of the trough portion 13 is about 3 cm. A relatively long trough length is preferred so as to permit a lengthier core sample to be obtained from a patient. Such lengthy sample sizes allow the user to advantageously observe the pathological history of the sampled bone.
The distal tip 15 of the trough portion 13 of the sampling cannula 10 can be shaped to facilitate penetration and cutting of the bone tissue. In one embodiment and as shown in
The dimensions of the trough portion 13 in terms of cross-sectional intact circumference of the cannula body 10 can vary provided sampling by rotational motion thereof can effectively sever and retain a sample therein without adversely compromising the structural integrity of the trough portion. In addition to trough portion length, the rigidity of the cannula body material, thickness of the cannula wall, diameter (gauge) of the cannula all must be balanced together with the amount of the intact portion of the cannula body in the trough. The amount of intact cross-sectional circumference of the trough portion can range from about 65% to about 85% of a complete cannula circumference. The amount of the intact portion of the trough will vary in cooperation with the diameter or size of the cannula used. Accordingly, the larger the diameter (or lower the gauge) of the cannula, the greater the amount of intact portion required. For example, if a 13 gauge cannula is used for the device, the amount of intact circumferential portion can be about 65%, whereas is an 8 gauge cannula is used, the amount of intact circumferential portion can be about 85%.
During sampling, opening(s) 16 through the wall of the trough portion function to permit a slight encroachment of the tissue therein, thereby physically “interlocking” or engaging a portion of the sample within and providing resistance to longitudinal migration of the sample. The number, size, shape and arrangement of wall opening(s) 16 in the trough portion 13 can vary provided the opening(s) 16 enhance the retention of the sample within the trough. In accordance with the invention, at least one opening 16 is present through the wall of the trough portion 13. In a preferred embodiment, a plurality of wall openings 16 in the trough portion 13 are present. In one embodiment shown in the Figures, three openings can be present.
The shape of the wall opening(s) 16 can vary as well. Opening shapes which can be used include, but are not limited to, rectangular, square, ovular, circular, triangular, and the like. A preferred opening shape is substantially rectangular opening wherein the longer dimension is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the sampling cannula body as shown in
The size of opening 16, i.e., opening dimensions, can vary provided it is large enough to permit encroachment of the collected tissue sample while small enough to avoid compromising the structural integrity of the trough portion. When a substantially rectangular opening shape is used, the opening(s) can have a length (relative to the longitudinal axis of the trough portion) ranging from about 0.25 mm to about 0.75 mm. In one embodiment, a rectangular opening has a length of about 0.50 mm. The width (relative to the longitudinal axis of the trough portion) of a rectangular opening can vary as well. The depth (inward direction from a side view relative to the bottom-most portion of the base of the trough) can vary and is typically in the range from about 0.1 mm to about 0.3 mm.
When a plurality of openings are used, the trough portion of the device can comprise combinations of opening shapes having the different sizes, shapes, or both. According to the invention and when a plurality of openings are used, the arrangement of openings 16 in the trough portion 13 can vary as well. Suitable opening arrangements include, but are not limited to, linear alignment along the longitudinal axis of the cannula (as shown in the Figures) and staggered within the trough portion. In a preferred embodiment, a plurality of openings 16 are located within a distance from about 1 cm to about 1.5 cm from the distal end 15 of the trough portion 13.
Referring again to
In a further embodiment, the exterior surface of the proximal portion 11 of the sampling cannula can comprise viewable markings or indicia 17. Markings 17 which can be used include, but are not limited to, orientation indicia, depth markings, numbers, symbols, letters, and the like. Such markings can be printed, etched or embossed. In one particular embodiment and as shown in
Thus, in use, the distance of displacement of the sampling cannula relative to the outer cannula after the outer cannula has been advanced into the sampling site should substantially correspond to the length of the sample which will be obtained when the sampling cannula is likewise advanced and rotated to sever the sample.
The proximal portion 11 of the sampling cannula of the invention can further comprise a hub 18 coupled thereto in order to facilitate grip and handling by the user during operation of device, e.g., forward pressure for insertion in longitudinal direction and rotational motion for severing sample from site. The hub 18 can be attached to the cannula body 10 using a variety of conventional techniques, such as UV-curable adhesive bonding. The exterior surface of the hub 18 can comprise a surface texture, treatment or geometry to further facilitate grip and handling. The hub 18 can also further comprise markings or indicia, such as an orientation marking 90 (see
According to the invention, the sampling cannula can be used as a component of a bone biopsy assembly such as that described by Krueger et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,443,910, the entire text of which is incorporated herein by reference. In general, bone biopsy assemblies that can be used which include the sampling cannula of the invention include those such as that shown in
Accordingly, the handle 22 is fixed to the outer cannula 20, and the stylet 21 is positioned within the outer cannula 20 and the cap 40 secured onto the handle 22 and covering the proximal end of the stylet 30. The assembled system is then inserted into the bone as illustrated in
The bone biopsy system can further comprise an ejector rod 30 adapted or structured to be inserted within the sampling cannula in order to expel the core sample from the sampling cannula. The ejector rod 30 can comprise an ejector rod hub 31. The ejector rod can be composed of any rigid or semi-rigid material suitable for such use, including polymeric and metallic materials. Preferably, the ejector rod 30 is composed of plastic.
The sampling cannula 10, outer cannula 20 and stylet 21 can be composed of any material which is sterilizable and suitable for use in medical devices and which can withstand the physical forces exerted upon it during bone biopsy techniques. Suitable materials include metals and metallic alloys, such as stainless steel and titanium. The hub, handle and ejector rod components can be composed of polymeric materials or plastic, and made according to conventional molding techniques readily available to those in the medical device field.
Process of Making the Device:
The following is one example of a manufacturing technique which can be used to make the device in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
Raw stainless steel tubing is cut to the desired length using a disc cutter to prepare a cannula. A bevel or curved tip is created in one end of the cannula using a grinder at the desired angle relative to the longitudinal axis of the cannula. One or more of the cannulas are fixed onto a plate. A wheel grinder is applied to the uppermost surface of each cannula and applied to the desired depth to remove the uppermost surface of the cannula as well as the desired length of the cannula to be removed. The grinder thus creates a trough structure and exposes the interior of the cannula. Next, a grinding machine is applied to the underside intact portion of the cannula using one or more discs sized and spaced to create the desired dimensions of the openings in the trough portion. More than one opening can be created simultaneously. Electropolishing techniques using electrolytic acid solution can be used to remove burrs and particulate matter from the surface. The exposed interior of the trough portion of the cannula can be sandblasted to create the roughened surface texture. Additionally, the exterior surface of the proximal end of the cannula can be sandblasted as well to facilitate the bonding of a hub thereto. To attach a hub to the proximal end of the cannula, the hub can be positioned on the proximal end and bonding material can be injected into the space between.
Plastic components, for example a sampling cannula hub 18, can be formed in accordance with conventional molding equipment and methods readily available in the art.
Biopsy Procedure Using the Device:
Referring to
The patient is prepared in accordance with standard surgical preparation techniques for bone biopsy procedures. As seen in Step #1, a bone biopsy assembly including an outer cannula 20 with a removable stylet 21 within and coupled to a handle 22 is inserted into the patient penetrating the skin and cortical layer of the bone to be sampled. Once the cortex of the bone has been penetrated by the distal end of the outer cannula 20, the stylet 21 is then removed as depicted in Step #2. As shown in Step #3, once the stylet has been removed, the outer cannula 20 is further advanced into the sampling site to create a “core” sample within the outer cannula. At this point, the device of the invention is inserted into the interior of the outer cannula to the desired depth as indicated by observing the proximal portion of the device outside the patient's body as depicted in Step #4. Once the device of the invention, specifically the trough portion of the device, has been advanced to the desired extent, the user rotates the hub as shown in Step #5 to rotate the trough portion of the device to sever the sample from the site. The device of the invention is then removed from the bone with the sample contained within the trough. Once outside of the patient's body, the ejector rod 30 can be inserted into the device in a longitudinal direction to expel the sample from the device as shown in Step #6. Alternatively and as shown in Steps #4and 5, the ejector rod 30 can accompany the device of the invention throughout the insertion and removal of the device wherein the rod does not penetrate beyond the cortex.
The invention is useful in the medical field under circumstances where sampling a patient's bone tissue is needed. The device affords the practitioner or user the advantages of maintaining the architectural integrity of the sample as well as improved sample retention upon removal.
The invention has been described with reference to various and specific embodiments and techniques. It will be understood, however, that reasonable modifications and variations of such embodiments and techniques can be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention defined by the claims set forth below.
This application is based on U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/335,694 filed on Oct. 25, 2001 and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/799,143 filed Mar. 5, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,730,043 issued on May 4, 2004, which I a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/552,444 filed Apr. 18, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,443,910 issued Sep. 3, 2002.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2219605 | Turkel | Oct 1940 | A |
| 2827039 | Seiger | Mar 1958 | A |
| 3007471 | McClure, Jr. | Nov 1961 | A |
| 3175554 | Stewart | Mar 1965 | A |
| 3554185 | Kohl | Jan 1971 | A |
| 3570498 | Weighton | Mar 1971 | A |
| 3606878 | Kellogg, Jr. | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3844272 | Banko | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3882849 | Jamshidi | May 1975 | A |
| 3929123 | Jamshidi | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3995619 | Glatzer | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4010737 | Vilaghy et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4013080 | Froning | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4096860 | McLaughlin | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4356828 | Jamshidi | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4396021 | Baumgartner | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4403617 | Tretinyak | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4461305 | Cibley | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4469109 | Mehl | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4487209 | Mehl | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4543966 | Islam et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4619272 | Zambelli | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4630616 | Tretinyak | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4643196 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4649918 | Pegg et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4681123 | Valtchev | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4682606 | DeCaprio | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4699154 | Lindgren | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4702260 | Wang | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4708147 | Haaga | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4747414 | Brossel | May 1988 | A |
| 4766907 | de Groot et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4774948 | Markham | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4781202 | Janese | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4785826 | Ward | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4790329 | Simon | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4793363 | Ausherman et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4798213 | Doppelt | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4799494 | Wang | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4799495 | Hawkins et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4817631 | Schnepp-Pesch et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4838282 | Strasser et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| D303009 | Strasser et al. | Aug 1989 | S |
| 4873991 | Skinner | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4903709 | Skinner | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4922602 | Mehl | May 1990 | A |
| 4931059 | Markham | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4936313 | Burkhardt et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4953558 | Akerfeldt | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4958625 | Bates et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4986279 | O'Neill | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5012818 | Joishy | May 1991 | A |
| 5027827 | Cody et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5031634 | Simon | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5036860 | Leigh et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5040542 | Gray | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5080655 | Haaga | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5127916 | Spencer et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5172701 | Leigh | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5284156 | Schramm et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5318543 | Ross et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5333619 | Burgio | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5341816 | Allen | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5348022 | Leigh et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5357974 | Baldridge | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5368045 | Clement et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5385151 | Scarfone et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5394887 | Haaga | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5429138 | Jamshidi | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5449001 | Terwilliger | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5462062 | Rubinstein et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5476101 | Schramm et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5476102 | Como et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5477862 | Haaga | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5487392 | Haaga | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5507298 | Schramm et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5522398 | Goldenberg et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5526821 | Jamshidi | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5595186 | Rubinstein et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5615690 | Giurtino et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5634473 | Goldenberg et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5655542 | Weilandt | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5713368 | Leigh | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5718237 | Haaga | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5788651 | Weilandt | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5807277 | Swaim | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5823970 | Terwilliger | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5833628 | Yuan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5843001 | Goldenberg | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5868684 | Akerfeldt et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5885226 | Rubinstein et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5910121 | Paolo et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5944673 | Gregoire et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5964716 | Gregoire et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6007496 | Brannon | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6063037 | Mittermeier et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6066153 | Lev | May 2000 | A |
| 6086543 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6110128 | Andelin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6162203 | Haaga | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6165136 | Nishtala | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6241687 | Voegele et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6416484 | Miller et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6428487 | Burdorff et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6764452 | Gillespie et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 20010005778 | Ouchi | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20020042581 | Cervi | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020151822 | Burdorff et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20040267268 | Gillespie et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 4305226 | Sep 1993 | DE |
| 1136039 | Sep 2001 | EP |
| 1175866 | Jan 2002 | EP |
| 0738126 | Apr 2002 | EP |
| 2687303 | Aug 1993 | FR |
| 01261099 | May 1996 | IT |
| 483978 | Sep 1975 | SU |
| 567447 | Aug 1977 | SU |
| WO 9732524 | Sep 1997 | WO |
| WO 0010465 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20030050574 A1 | Mar 2003 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60335694 | Oct 2001 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09552444 | Apr 2000 | US |
| Child | 09799143 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09799143 | Mar 2001 | US |
| Child | 10280166 | US |