The present system and method relate to bone fixation devices. More particularly, the present system and method provide for a screw assembly configured to facilitate the internal fixation of vertebral bodies.
Various devices for internal fixation of bone segments in the human or animal body are known in the art. One type of system is a pedicle screw system, which is sometimes used as an adjunct to spinal fusion surgery, and which provides a means of gripping a spinal segment. A conventional pedicle screw system comprises a pedicle screw and a rod-receiving device. The pedicle screw includes an externally threaded stem and a head portion. The rod-receiving device couples to the head portion of the pedicle screw and receives a rod (commonly referred to as a distraction rod). Two such systems are inserted into respective vertebrae and adjusted to distract and/or stabilize a spinal column, for instance during an operation to correct a herniated disk. The pedicle screw does not, by itself, fixate the spinal segment, but instead operates as an anchor point to receive the rod-receiving device, which in turn receives the rod. One goal of such a system is to substantially reduce and/or prevent relative motion between the spinal segments that are being fused.
Although conventional prior art pedicle screw systems exist, they lack features that enhance and/or benefit newer, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques that are more commonly being used for spinal surgeries. It has been suggested that one possible advantage of an MIS approach is that it can decrease a patient's recovery time.
Conventional pedicle screw systems and even more recently designed pedicle screw systems have several drawbacks. Some of these pedicle screw systems are rather large and bulky, which may result in more tissue damage in and around the surgical site when the pedicle screw system is installed during surgery. The prior art pedicle screw systems have a rod-receiving device that is pre-operatively coupled or attached to the pedicle screw. In addition, some of the prior art pedicle screw systems include numerous components that must all be carefully assembled together. Further, traditional pedicle screw systems are pre-operatively assembled, which makes these systems more difficult to install and maneuver in a spinal operation where MIS techniques are used.
An exemplary tulip assembly configured to be coupled to a head of a bone fixation device includes at least one inner member configured to fix the tulip assembly to the head of a bone fixation device, and an outer member including at least one engagement surface configured to selectively fix a rod in the tulip assembly via rotation of the outer member.
According to another exemplary embodiment, a tulip assembly configured to be coupled to a head of a bone fixation device includes at least one inner member configured to fix an angular position of the tulip assembly relative to the bone fixation device and an outer member including at least one engagement surface configured to selectively fix a rod in the tulip assembly via rotation of the outer member. According to this exemplary embodiment, the fixation of an angular position of the tulip assembly relative to the bone fixation device and the rod fixation are temporally separate operations.
According to yet another exemplary embodiment, a tulip assembly configured to be coupled to a head of a bone fixation device includes: an outer housing member including an upper portion and a lower portion having an internal tapered edge in the lower portion, a first inner member disposed in a lower portion of the outer member, the first inner member being elastically expandable to receive the head of a bone fixation device, a second inner member disposed in an upper portion of the outer member, the second inner member being configured to receive a distraction rod, wherein the first inner member includes an external tapered edge and an internal tapered edge, the external tapered edge being configured to mate with the internal tapered edge of the outer housing member to compress the first inner member.
A pedicle screw system, according to one exemplary embodiment disclosed herein, includes a pedicle screw having a threaded portion and a head portion, and a tulip assembly including at least one inner member configured to fix said tulip assembly to the head portion, and an outer member including at least one engagement surface configured to selectively fix a rod in the tulip assembly via rotation of the outer member.
Similarly, a method of fixing a tulip assembly to a pedicle screw includes inserting the pedicle screw into a bone, the pedicle screw including a head portion, expanding a first inner member over and head portion of the pedicle screw after the pedicle screw is inserted into a bone, fixing an angle of the tulip assembly relative to the pedicle screw using the first inner member and a second inner member, inserting a rod into the tulip assembly, and positionally locking the rod in the tulip assembly after the angle is fixed by rotating an outer member of the tulip assembly including at least one rod engagement surface.
Another exemplary method of fixing a tulip assembly to a pedicle screw includes inserting the pedicle screw into a bone, the pedicle screw including a head portion, expanding a first inner member over and head portion of the pedicle screw after the pedicle screw is inserted into a bone, fixing an angle of the tulip assembly relative to the pedicle screw using the first inner member and a second inner member, and positionally locking a rod in the tulip assembly after the angle is fixed.
The accompanying drawings illustrate various exemplary embodiments of the present system and method and are a part of the specification. Together with the following description, the drawings demonstrate and explain the principles of the present system and method. The illustrated embodiments are examples of the present system and method and do not limit the scope thereof.
Throughout the drawings, identical reference numbers designate similar but not necessarily identical elements.
The present specification describes a system and a method for separately locking the orientation of a tulip assembly relative to a pedicle screw and locking a positional location of a rod in the tulip assembly. Further, according to one exemplary embodiment, the present specification describes the structure of a tulip assembly configured to be placed on the head of a pedicle screw after placement of the pedicle screw in a patient's body and configured to receive and positionally secure a top loaded rod. Further details of the present exemplary system and method will be provided below.
By way of example, pedicle screw systems may be fixed in the spine in a posterior lumbar fusion process via minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques. The systems are inserted into the pedicles of the spine and then interconnected with rods to manipulate (e.g., correct the curvature, compress or expand, and/or structurally reinforce) at least portions of the spine. Using the MIS approach to spinal fixation and/or correction surgery has been shown to decrease a patient's recovery time and reduce the risks of follow-up surgeries.
The ability to efficiently perform spinal fixation and/or correction surgeries using MIS techniques is enhanced by the use of pedicle screw systems provided in accordance with the present exemplary systems and methods, which systems and methods provide a number of advantages over conventional systems. For example, a pedicle screw system in accordance with one embodiment of the present exemplary system and method provides the advantage that the pedicle screw may be inserted into the bone without being pre-operatively coupled with the rod-coupling assembly (hereinafter referred to as a tulip assembly). This is advantageous because the surgeon often needs to do other inter-body work after inserting the pedicle screw, but before attaching the larger and bulkier tulip assembly. Such an advantageous pedicle screw system may be even more crucial when using MIS techniques because the inter-body spatial boundaries in which the surgeon must work may be quite limited.
In addition, pedicle screw systems in accordance with several embodiments of the present system and method advantageously allow a user to initially fix (e.g., lock) the tulip assembly to the pedicle screw at a desired angle before inserting and/or capturing the rod. Initially locking the tulip assembly to the pedicle screw means that at least one of the components of the tulip assembly is manipulated to grip and/or clamp onto the pedicle screw to reduce and/or prevent any translational and/or rotational movement of the tulip assembly relative to the pedicle screw. The ability to initially lock the tulip assembly to the pedicle screw may facilitate the surgeon in performing compression and/or distraction of various spinal and/or bone sections.
The term “distraction,” when used herein and when used in a medical sense, generally relates to joint surfaces and suggests that the joint surfaces move perpendicular to one another. However when “traction” and/or “distraction” is performed, for example on spinal sections, the spinal sections may move relative to one another through a combination of distraction and gliding, and/or other degrees of freedom.
Another advantageous feature of at least one embodiment of the present exemplary system and method is that an all-inclusive tulip assembly that can be coupled to the head portion of the pedicle screw intra-operatively is disclosed. This advantageous tulip assembly may include the aspects or features that enable the tulip assembly to be initially locked onto the head portion of the pedicle screw and then to further receive, capture, and finally lock the rod into the tulip assembly. In one exemplary embodiment, the tulip assembly is initially locked onto the head portion of the pedicle screw after the rod has been received in the tulip assembly. This advantageous tulip assembly may decrease the complexity of the pedicle screw system installation by reducing the installation to essentially a three-step process including, inserting the pedicle screw into bone, initially locking the tulip assembly onto the pedicle screw, which may be accomplished with or without the rod in the tulip assembly, and then capturing and locking the rod into the tulip assembly. In addition to accommodating the new MIS approach to spinal correction and/or fusion, the present exemplary system and method are configured to eliminate instances of cross-threading and/or post-operative tulip splaying, which occurs when the amount of stress/strain in rod, which may be caused by post-operative back flexion, forces open the tulip assembly and eventually leads to the disassembly and/or the failure of the pedicle screw system.
In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present system and method for separately locking the orientation of a tulip assembly relative to a pedicle screw and a positional location of a rod in the tulip assembly. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present method may be practiced without these specific details. Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. The appearance of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
Exemplary Overall Structure
While the present system and method may be practiced by or incorporated into any number of bone fixation systems, the present system and method will be described herein, for ease of explanation only, in the context of a pedicle screw system. Accordingly, the present system and method includes, according to one exemplary embodiment illustrated in
According to one exemplary embodiment,
In one exemplary embodiment, the pedicle screw (102) is cannulated, which means a channel (130) (shown in dashed lines and extending axially through the pedicle screw (102)) extends through the entire length of the pedicle screw (102). The channel (130) allows the pedicle screw (102) to be maneuvered over and receive a Kirschner wire, commonly referred to as a K-wire. The K-wire is typically pre-positioned using imaging techniques, for example, fluoroscopy imaging, and then used to provide precise placement of the pedicle screw (102). While the pedicle screw (102) illustrated in
Returning again to
According to one exemplary embodiment, the bore (138) is configured to facilitate assembly of the tulip assembly (106;
Continuing with
The tulip body (132) also includes a number of elements that allow the relative angular position (107;
The inner member (134) of the present tulip assembly (106;
Specifically, as illustrated in
Additionally, as illustrated in
Exemplary Implementation and Operation
As illustrated in
With the one or more pedicle screws inserted into a patient's spinal system (step 1000), the tulip assembly may be snapped over the head of a previously inserted pedicle screw (step 1005), as illustrated by the arrow in
Once the tulip assembly (106) is at the desired position relative to the pedicle screw (102), the tulip assembly may then be rotated to achieve a desired orientation with respect to the pedicle screw (step 1010;
With the tulip assembly (106) positioned relative to the pedicle screw (step 1010;
The upward force applied to the tulip body (132), illustrated by the arrow of
In addition, as illustrated in
Continuing with
With the rod (104) inserted in the rod reception channel (step 1030), the tulip position relative to the pedicle screw may be provisionally locked by positioning the inner tulip member (step 1040;
According to one exemplary embodiment, when the positioning lip (815) of the inner member (134) is placed under the internal lip (143) of the tulip body (132), the frictional force exerted on the head portion (110) of the pedicle screw (102) is maintained, provisionally locking the tulip position. According to one exemplary embodiment, the friction provided by the head receiving taper (830) portion of the inner member is greater than the friction provided by the lower head interfacing surface (940) and the seating taper (900) of the expansion/contraction member (136). This variation of friction between the lower head interfacing surface (940) and the head receiving taper (830) prevents screw advancement when the outer housing is rotated for rod locking, as is described below. According to one exemplary embodiment, the variation of friction between the lower head interfacing surface (940) and the head receiving taper (830) is achieved by varying their respective tapers, and consequently, varying the mechanical advantage achieved by each.
With the position of the tulip assembly (106) relative to the pedicle screw (102) established, the tulip body (132) may be partially rotated to substantially retain the rod (step 1050;
As the tulip body (132) is further rotated, as illustrated in
During operation, the present exemplary pedicle screw system as described, but not limited to the embodiments herein, is designed for fixation of bone material and/or bone segments during a surgical procedure, such as fusing spinal segments in which MIS techniques are employed. For example, according to one exemplary embodiment, the pedicle screw system is inserted into the pedicles of a patient's spine and then interconnected with rods to provide support to the spine to allow for post-operative fusion of the spinal segments. While the pedicle screw can be inserted with the tulip assembly coupled with the pedicle screw, one embodiment for the installation of the pedicle screw system includes inserting the pedicle screw into the bone and subsequently coupling the tulip assembly to the pedicle screw, where such an approach has advantages over currently known pedicle screw system assemblies and/or installations.
In addition, according to a number of exemplary embodiments, various structural features of the pedicle screw system as described, but not limited to the embodiments herein, may provide other advantages over existing pedicle screw systems. First, the pedicle screw may be inserted into the bone of a patient without the presence of the tulip assembly or rod, which permits the surgeon to place the screw and then perform subsequent inter-body work without having to work around the tulip assembly or the rod. Second, the tulip assembly includes a mechanism for capturing the rod that eliminates problems associated with conventional pedicle screws, such as cross-threading, because the exemplary pedicle screw systems disclosed herein do not use any threads to couple the tulip assembly to the pedicle screw or to capture and lock the rod into the tulip assembly. Third, the interface between the head portion of the pedicle screw and the tulip assembly provide an initial lock, which allows the angle of the tulip assembly to be set or fixed with respect to the pedicle screw before insertion of the rod and/or before the rod is captured in the tulip assembly. With this type of pedicle screw system, the surgeon has the ability to check and even double check the placement, angle, and/or orientation regarding aspects of the pedicle screw system to facilitate, and even optimize, the compression, distraction, and/or other manipulation of the spinal segments. Further, the present exemplary pedicle screw system accommodates the new MIS techniques being applied to spinal operations.
One possible post-operative advantage of the present exemplary pedicle screw system is that the cooperation and interaction of the inner member with the tulip body of the tulip assembly substantially reduces, and most likely prevents, the known problem of tulip splaying. Tulip splaying is generally regarded as a post-operative problem caused by a stressed rod forcing open portions of the tulip body, which eventually leads to the disassembly and likely failure of the pedicle screw system within the patient. Yet another post-operative advantage of the pedicle screw systems is that unlike existing rod-coupling members or constructs, the exemplary tulip assemblies described herein have a smaller size envelope (e.g., less bulky, lower profile, and/or more compact shape) and are easier to place onto the pedicle screw, when compared to traditional tulip assemblies. The smaller size and ease of installation may reduce trauma to the soft-tissue regions in the vicinity of the surgical site, which in turn generally allows for a quicker recovery by the patient. Yet another possible advantage of the present exemplary pedicle screw system over traditional existing systems is that all of the parts needed to lock the tulip assembly to the pedicle screw and to capture and lock the rod into the tulip assembly are included within the tulip assembly. Accordingly, once the tulip assembly is snapped or otherwise coupled to the pedicle screw, no additional locking cap or threaded fastener is needed to complete the assembly/installation of the pedicle screw system. According to aspects described herein, and as appended by the claims, the present exemplary pedicle screw systems permit insertion of the pedicle screw without the tulip assembly coupled thereto, locking the tulip assembly onto the pedicle screw, and subsequently capturing and locking the rod into the tulip assembly.
The preceding description has been presented only to illustrate and describe the present method and system. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present system and method to any precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching.
The foregoing embodiments were chosen and described in order to illustrate principles of the system and method as well as some practical applications. The preceding description enables others skilled in the art to utilize the method and system in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the present exemplary system and method be defined by the following claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/258,831 titled “Pedicle Screw Systems and Methods of Assembling/Installing the Same” filed on Oct. 25, 2005, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. .section. 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 60/622,107 filed Oct. 25, 2004; 60/622,180 filed Oct. 25, 2004; 60/629,785 filed Nov. 19, 2004; 60/663,092 filed Mar. 18, 2005; and 60/684,697 filed May 25, 2005 all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties and made a part hereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
483342 | Bolte | Sep 1892 | A |
900717 | Feaster | Oct 1908 | A |
2344381 | Young | Mar 1944 | A |
3019504 | Castagliuolo | Feb 1962 | A |
3648691 | Lumb et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3752203 | Hill, Jr. | Aug 1973 | A |
3875936 | Volz | Apr 1975 | A |
4011602 | Rybicki et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4085744 | Lewis et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4269178 | Keene | May 1981 | A |
4289124 | Zickel | Sep 1981 | A |
4294300 | Bouwman | Oct 1981 | A |
4309139 | Nakae | Jan 1982 | A |
4411259 | Drummond | Oct 1983 | A |
4604995 | Stephens et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4611580 | Wu | Sep 1986 | A |
4611581 | Steffee | Sep 1986 | A |
4641636 | Cotrel | Feb 1987 | A |
4648388 | Steffee | Mar 1987 | A |
4653481 | Howland et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4655199 | Steffee | Apr 1987 | A |
4658809 | Ulrich et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4696290 | Steffee | Sep 1987 | A |
4719905 | Steffee | Jan 1988 | A |
4763644 | Webb | Aug 1988 | A |
4771767 | Steffee | Sep 1988 | A |
4805602 | Puno et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4815453 | Cotrel | Mar 1989 | A |
4887595 | Heinig et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4887596 | Sherman | Dec 1989 | A |
4913134 | Luque | Apr 1990 | A |
4946458 | Harms et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4950269 | Gaines | Aug 1990 | A |
5005562 | Cotrel | Apr 1991 | A |
5024213 | Asher et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5042982 | Harms et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5067955 | Cotrel | Nov 1991 | A |
5084049 | Asher et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5092867 | Harms et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5113685 | Asher et al. | May 1992 | A |
5120171 | Lasner | Jun 1992 | A |
5127912 | Ray et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5129900 | Asher et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5176680 | Vignaud et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5183359 | Barth | Feb 1993 | A |
5190543 | Schlapfer | Mar 1993 | A |
5207678 | Harms et al. | May 1993 | A |
5257993 | Asher et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5261913 | Marnay | Nov 1993 | A |
5312402 | Schlapfer | May 1994 | A |
5346493 | Stahurski et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5360431 | Puno et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5380325 | Lahille et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5466237 | Byrd, III et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474555 | Puno et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5520689 | Schlapfer | May 1996 | A |
5549608 | Errico et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5562663 | Wisnewski et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5603714 | Kaneda et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609593 | Errico et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5624442 | Mellinger et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5647873 | Errico et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5667508 | Errico et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669911 | Errico et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5690630 | Errico et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5797911 | Sherman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5879350 | Sherman | Mar 1999 | A |
5882350 | Ralph | Mar 1999 | A |
5885286 | Sherman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891145 | Morrison et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5954725 | Sherman | Sep 1999 | A |
6010503 | Richelsoph | Jan 2000 | A |
6063090 | Schlapfer | May 2000 | A |
6077262 | Schlapfer et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6090111 | Nichols | Jul 2000 | A |
6113601 | Tatar | Sep 2000 | A |
6132432 | Richelsoph | Oct 2000 | A |
6235033 | Brace et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6280442 | Barker et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6302888 | Mellinger et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
RE37665 | Ralph | Apr 2002 | E |
6371957 | Amrein et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6402752 | Schaffler-Wachter | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6451021 | Ralph et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6475218 | Gournay et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6488681 | Martin et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6623485 | Doubler et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626908 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6652526 | Arafiles | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6660004 | Barker et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6716214 | Jackson | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6730089 | Jackson | May 2004 | B2 |
6730093 | Saint Martin | May 2004 | B2 |
6755829 | Bono et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6786903 | Lin | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6793657 | Lee et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802844 | Ferree | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6827719 | Ralph et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6840940 | Ralph et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6843791 | Serhan | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6858030 | Martin et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6869433 | Glascott | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6896677 | Lin | May 2005 | B1 |
7022122 | Amrein | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7081117 | Bono et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083621 | Shaolian et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7125426 | Moumene et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7141051 | Janowski et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7261715 | Rezach et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7291151 | Alvarez | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7291153 | Glascott | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7294128 | Alleyne et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7322981 | Jackson | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7338491 | Baker et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7377923 | Purcell et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
20020013585 | Gournay et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026193 | Barker et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020082601 | Toyama et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091386 | Martin et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111626 | Ralph et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120272 | Yuan et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133154 | Saint Martin | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133158 | Saint Martin | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143341 | Biedermann et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151900 | Glascott | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020183748 | Martin et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030073996 | Doubler et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078583 | Biedermann et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030187433 | Lin | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030187434 | Lin | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199873 | Richelsoph | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040039383 | Jackson | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039384 | Boehm | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049190 | Biedermann | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040097933 | Lourdel et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040116929 | Barker et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127896 | Lombardo et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138662 | Landry et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153068 | Janowski et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172020 | Beaurain et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040172022 | Landry et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040236330 | Purcell et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249380 | Glascott | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050033296 | Bono et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049589 | Jackson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050113830 | Rezach et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131410 | Lin | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050177154 | Moumene et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177157 | Jahng | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182400 | White | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187548 | Butler et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192570 | Jackson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050192571 | Abdelgany | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050192573 | Abdelgany | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203515 | Doherty et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203516 | Biedermann et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203519 | Harms et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215998 | Donath | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215999 | Birkmeyer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216003 | Biedermann et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216004 | Schwab | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222570 | Jackson | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050261687 | Garamszegi et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060025771 | Jackson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060069391 | Jackson | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084982 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084984 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084987 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089644 | Felix | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100621 | Jackson | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100622 | Jackson | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111712 | Jackson | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111715 | Jackson | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129147 | Biedermann et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129149 | Iott et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155278 | Warnick | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161152 | Ensign et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161153 | Hawkes et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173456 | Hawkes et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195086 | Sybert | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060217716 | Baker et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229615 | Abdou | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235392 | Hammer et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235393 | Bono et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241603 | Jackson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060264933 | Baker et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276792 | Ensign et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293659 | Alvarez | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293664 | Schumacher | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070043357 | Kirschman | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043359 | Altarac et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055242 | Bailly | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093831 | Abdelgany et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093832 | Abdelgany | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100341 | Reglos et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123867 | Kirschman | May 2007 | A1 |
20070162008 | Cline, Jr. et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167949 | Altarac et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070239159 | Altarac et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070293861 | Rezach et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080039839 | Songer et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039840 | Songer et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045956 | Songer et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080071277 | Warnick | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097441 | Hayes et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097457 | Warnick | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080167689 | Matthis et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3219575 | Dec 1983 | DE |
3639810 | May 1988 | DE |
3711013 | Jun 1988 | DE |
9403231 | Apr 1994 | DE |
128058 | Dec 1984 | EP |
242705 | Oct 1987 | EP |
242708 | Oct 1987 | EP |
1190678 | Mar 2002 | EP |
2615095 | Nov 1988 | FR |
2624720 | Jun 1989 | FR |
2706762 | Dec 1994 | FR |
2852815 | Oct 2004 | FR |
167228 | Jul 1921 | GB |
2173104 | Oct 1986 | GB |
8707134 | Dec 1987 | WO |
0152758 | Jun 2001 | WO |
02080788 | Oct 2002 | WO |
03086204 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2004103194 | May 2004 | WO |
2006047555 | May 2006 | WO |
2006047707 | May 2006 | WO |
2006047711 | May 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070123862 A1 | May 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60684697 | May 2005 | US | |
60663092 | Mar 2005 | US | |
60629785 | Nov 2004 | US | |
60622107 | Oct 2004 | US | |
60622180 | Oct 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11258831 | Oct 2005 | US |
Child | 11327132 | US |