The field of the invention generally relates to medical devices for treating conditions involving the skeletal system and in particular bone growth applications.
Distraction osteogenesis, also known as distraction callotasis and osteodistraction has been used successfully to lengthen long bones of the body. Typically, the bone, if not already fractured, is purposely fractured by means of a corticotomy, and the two segments of bone are gradually distracted apart, which allows new bone to form in the gap. If the distraction rate is too high, there is a risk of nonunion, if the rate is too low, there is a risk that the two segments will completely fuse to each other before the distraction period is complete. When the desired length of the bone is achieved using this process, the bone is allowed to consolidate. Distraction osteogenesis applications are mainly focused on the growth of the femur or tibia, but may also include the humerus, the jaw bone (micrognathia), or other bones. The reasons for lengthening or growing bones are multifold, the applications including, but not limited to: post osteosarcoma bone cancer; cosmetic lengthening (both legs-femur and/or tibia) in short stature or dwarfism/achondroplasia; lengthening of one limb to match the other (congenital, post-trauma, post-skeletal disorder, prosthetic knee joint), non-unions.
Distraction osteogenesis using external fixators has been done for many years, but the external fixator can be unwieldy for the patient. It can also be painful, and the patient is subject to the risk of pin track infections, joint stiffness, loss of appetite, depression, cartilage damage and other side effects. Having the external fixator in place also delays the beginning of rehabilitation.
In response to the shortcomings of external fixator distraction, intramedullary distraction nails have been surgically implanted which are contained entirely within the bone. Some are automatically lengthened via repeated rotation of the patient's limb. This can sometimes be painful to the patient, and can often proceed in an uncontrolled fashion. This therefore makes it difficult to follow the strict daily or weekly lengthening regime that avoids nonunion (if too fast) or early consolidation (if too slow). Lower limb distraction rates are on the order of one millimeter per day. Other intramedullary nails have been developed which have an implanted motor and are remotely controlled. The motorized intramedullary nails have an antenna which needs to be implanted subcutaneously, thus complicating the surgical procedure, and making it more invasive. These devices are therefore designed to be lengthened in a controlled manner, but due to their complexity, may not be manufacturable as an affordable product. Others have proposed intramedullary distracters containing and implanted magnet, which allows the distraction to be driven electromagnetically by an external stator (i.e., a large electromagnet). Because of the complexity and size of the external stator, this technology has not been reduced to a simple and cost-effective device that can be taken home, to allow patients to do daily lengthenings.
In a first embodiment, a lengthening device is configured for placement inside or across bone having first and second separate sections. The device includes a housing configured for attachment to one of the first and second separate bone sections and a distraction shaft having an internal cavity along a length thereof and configured for attachment to the other of the first and second separate bone sections. The device includes a permanent magnet configured for rotation relative to the housing and having at least two poles, the permanent magnet operatively coupled to a lead screw, the lead screw interfacing with a threaded portion of the internal cavity of the distraction shaft. A thrust bearing is disposed in the housing and interposed between the lead screw and the permanent magnet, the thrust bearing sandwiched between first and second abutments in the housing.
In a second embodiment, a lengthening device is configured for placement inside an intramedullary canal of a bone having first and second separate sections. The device includes a housing configured for attachment to one of the first and second separate bone sections and a distraction shaft having an internal cavity along a length thereof and configured for attachment to the other of the first and second separate bone sections. A permanent magnet is disposed in the housing and configured for rotation and having at least two poles. A planetary gear set having a plurality of gears is provided, wherein one of the gears is operatively coupled to the permanent magnet and configured for transmitting torque, and wherein another gear of the plurality of gears terminates in an output shaft operatively coupled to a lead screw, the lead screw interfacing with a threaded portion of the internal cavity of the distraction shaft.
In a third embodiment, a lengthening system is configured for placement inside an intramedullary canal of a bone. The system includes an actuator with a housing containing a rotatable permanent magnet and moveable distraction shaft telescopically mounted relative the housing, the moveable distraction shaft operatively coupled to the rotatable permanent magnet via a lead screw, wherein a distal end of the distraction shaft is configured for attachment to a first region of the bone and wherein a proximal end of the actuator has a geometrically shaped hub of a male type. The system further includes an extension rod having at one end thereof a geometrically shaped hub of a female type configured to secure to the geometrically shaped hub of the male type disposed on the actuator, wherein an opposing end of the extension rod is configured for attachment to a second region of the bone.
In yet another embodiment, a lengthening system is configured for placement inside an intramedullary canal of a bone. The system includes an actuator with a housing containing a rotatable permanent magnet and a moveable distraction shaft telescopically mounted relative the housing, the moveable distraction shaft operatively coupled to the rotatable permanent magnet via a lead screw, wherein a distal end of the distraction shaft is configured for attachment to a first region of the bone and wherein a proximal end of the actuator comprises a geometrically shaped hub of a female type. The system further includes an extension rod having at one end thereof a geometrically shaped hub of a male type configured to secure to the geometrically shaped hub of the female type disposed on the actuator, wherein an opposing end of the extension rod is configured for attachment to a second region of the bone.
In still another aspect of the invention, an external adjustment device for adjusting an adjustable implant includes a power supply, a control module, and a handheld device comprising at least one permanent magnet. The handheld device is configured to be placed on a first side of a patient's limb and the at least one permanent magnet is configured to turn a cylindrical magnet located inside an adjustable implant. The control module is configured to restrict the number of turns of the cylindrical magnet located inside the adjustable implant.
Over the treatment period, the bone 100 is continually distracted, creating a new separation 106, into which osteogenesis can occur. Continually distracted is meant to indicate that distraction occurs on a regular basis which may be on the order of every day or every few days. An exemplary distraction rate is one millimeter per day although other distraction rates may be employed. That is to say, a typical distraction regimen may include a daily increase in the length of the intramedullary lengthening device 110 by about one millimeter. This may be done, for example, by four lengthening periods per day, each having 0.25 mm of lengthening. The intramedullary lengthening device 110, as will be shown in the following FIGS., has a magnetic drive system, which allows the distraction shaft 114 to be telescopically extended from the housing 112, thus forcing the first section 102 and the second section 104 of the bone 100 apart from one another. As the distraction is performed, a portion of the housing 112 is able to slide within the hole or bore 108 of the first section 102 if bone 100 within a displacement section 120. The orientation of the intramedullary lengthening device 110 within the bone may be opposite of that shown in
Turning to
Cylindrical magnet 134 is fixedly contained within a magnet casing 158 using, for example, an adhesive such as an epoxy. The magnet casing 158 rotates relative to the magnet housing 128. The cylindrical magnet 134 may be a rare earth magnet such as Nd—Fe—B and may be coated with Parylene or other protective coatings in addition to being protected within the magnet casing 158, for example hermetically potted with epoxy. The magnet casing 158 contains an axle 160 on one end which attaches to the interior of a radial bearing 132. The outer diameter of the radial bearing 132 is secured to the interior of the end cap 130. This arrangement allows the cylindrical magnet 134 to rotate with minimal torsional resistance. At its other, opposing end, the magnet housing 158 includes an axle 161, which is attached to a first planetary gear set 154. The axle 161 includes the sun gear of the first planetary gear set 154, the sun gear turning the planetary gears of the first planetary gear set 154. The first planetary gear set 154 serves to reduce the rotational speed and increase the resultant torque delivery from the cylindrical magnet 134 to the lead screw 136. A second planetary gear set 156 is also shown between the first planetary gear set 154 and the lead screw 136, for further speed reduction and torque augmentation. The number of planetary gear sets and/or the number of teeth in the gears may be adjusted, in order to achieve the desired speed and torque delivery. For example, a lead screw with eighty (80) threads per inch attached to two planetary gear sets of 4:1 gear ratio each inside a 9 mm device with magnet location in the distal femur can achieve at least 100 lb. of distraction force at a greater than average distance or gap from the external device (
The thrust bearing 138 serves to protect the magnet/gear assembly of the drive from any significant compressive or tensile stresses. The thrust bearing 138 consists of two separate races with ball bearings between the two races. When there is a compressive force on the device, for example, when distracting a bone 100, and thus resisting the tensile strength of the soft tissues, the thrust bearing 138 abuts against a magnet housing abutment or lip 150 located in the magnet housing 128. Additionally, though the device is not typically intended for pulling bones together, there may be some applications where this is desired. For example, in certain compressive nail applications it is the goal to hold two fractured sections of a bone together. Because the bone 100 may have fractured in a non-uniform or shattered pattern, it may be difficult to determine the desired length of the nail until after it is implanted and fully attached. In these situations, it can be easy to misjudge the length, and so a gap may exist between the bones. By placing a slightly extended intramedullary device 110 and securing it, the device 110 may be retracted magnetically, after it has been secured within the bone fragments, so that it applies the desired compression between the two fragments. In these compressive nail applications, there would be tensile force on the device 110 and the thrust bearing 138 would abut against a splined housing abutment or lip 152. In both situations, the thrust bearing 138 and a rigid portion of one of the housing sections take the large stresses, not the magnet/gear assembly of the drive system. In particular, the thrust bearing 138 is sandwiched between the abutment or lip 150 and the abutment or lip 152.
Turning specifically to
Preferably, such instructions or limits may be pre-programmed by the physician or even the manufacturer in a secure fashion such that user cannot alter the pre-programmed setting(s). For example, a security code may be used to pre-program and change the daily distraction limit (or other parameters). In this example, the person operating the external adjustment device 180 will not be able to distract more than one (1) mm in a day (or more than two mm in a day), and will not have the security code to be able to change this function of the external adjustment device 180. This serves as a useful lockout feature to prevent accidental over-extension of the intramedullary lengthening device 110. The safety feature may monitor, for example, rotational movement of magnets 186 of the external adjustment device 180, described in more detail below, or the safety feature may monitor rotation of the cylindrical magnet 134 in the intramedullary lengthening device 110, via non-invasive sensing means.
The components of the magnetic handpiece 178 are held together between a magnet plate 190 and a front plate 192. Most of the components are protected by a cover 216. The magnets 186 rotate within a static magnet cover 188, so that the magnetic handpiece 178 may be rested directly on the patient, while not imparting any motion to the external surfaces of the patient. Prior to distracting the intramedullary lengthening device 110, the operator places the magnetic handpiece 178 over the patient near the location of the cylindrical magnet 134 as seen in
A cross section of a patient's lower thigh 218 with the intramedullary lengthening device 110 implanted within the femur 220 is shown in
The configuration of the magnetic handpiece 178 of the external adjustment device 180 as shown in
Turning to
Proximal locking screws 418 insert through locking screw holes 430 in the extension rod 406. The extension rod 406 may be straight, or may have a specific curve 432, for example, for matching the proximal end of the femur or tibia. It can be appreciated that the modular arrangement allows the actuator 412 to be attached to one of numerous different models of extension rods 406, having different lengths, curves (including straight), diameters, hole diameters, and angulations. The first sterilization tray 402 may include many of these different extension rods 406, which may be selected as appropriate, and attached to the actuator 412. Because the actuator 412 is supplied sterile, this arrangement is also desirable, as only a single model need be supplied. However, if desired, several models of actuator may exist, for example, different diameters (10.5 mm, 12.0 mm, 9 mm, 7.5 mm) or with different distal screw hole diameters, configurations or angulations. The preferred configuration for a multitude of patients and different bone types and sizes can be available, with a minimum number of sterile actuator models.
Turning to
Turning to
The torque limiting driver 488 of
It should be noted that although the embodiments of the intramedullary lengthening devices presented are shown to be used in a preferred orientation (distal vs. proximal), any of these embodiments may be used with the distraction shaft pointing distally or proximally. In addition, the invention may also be applied to distractible bone plates that are not located within the intramedullary canal, but are external to the bone.
An alternative lengthening scheme than those presented above may be also used. For example, one alternative includes the purposeful over-lengthening (to further stimulate growth) followed by some retraction (to minimize pain). For instance, each of four daily 0.25 mm lengthening periods may consist of 0.35 mm of lengthening, followed by 0.10 mm of retraction.
The materials of the accessories 408 are medical grade stainless steel, though other materials of varying densities may be used depending on the desired weight and the required size. The majority of the components of the intramedullary lengthening devices are preferably Titanium or Titanium alloys although some of the internal components may be made from stainless steel.
While embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, various modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. As one example, the devices described herein may be used to lengthen or reform a number of other bones such as the mandible or the cranium. The invention, therefore, should not be limited, except to the following claims, and their equivalents.
This Application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/240,071 filed on Sep. 4, 2009 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/363,986 filed on Jul. 13, 2010. The '071 and '986 Provisional Patent Applications are incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3810259 | Summers | May 1974 | A |
3976060 | Hildebrandt et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4522501 | Shannon | Jun 1985 | A |
4940467 | Tronzo | Jul 1990 | A |
5074882 | Grammont et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5263955 | Baumgart et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5364396 | Robinson et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5403322 | Herzenberg et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5429638 | Muschler et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5466261 | Richelsoph | Nov 1995 | A |
5516335 | Kummer et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527309 | Shelton | Jun 1996 | A |
5536269 | Spievack | Jul 1996 | A |
5549610 | Russell et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5575790 | Chen et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5620445 | Brosnahan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5620449 | Faccioli et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626579 | Muschler et al. | May 1997 | A |
5672177 | Seldin | Sep 1997 | A |
5704938 | Staehlin et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5704939 | Justin | Jan 1998 | A |
5720746 | Soubeiran | Feb 1998 | A |
5762599 | Sohn | Jun 1998 | A |
5935127 | Border | Aug 1999 | A |
5961553 | Coty et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976138 | Baumgart et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6033412 | Losken et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6106525 | Sachse | Aug 2000 | A |
6126661 | Faccioli et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6200317 | Aalsma et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6234956 | He et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245075 | Betz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6336929 | Justin | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6358283 | Hogfors et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6402753 | Cole et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417750 | Sohn | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6510345 | Van Bentem | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6565573 | Ferrante et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6565576 | Stauch et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6796984 | Soubeiran | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6835207 | Zacouto et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6918910 | Smith et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
8011308 | Picchio | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8057472 | Walker et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20010034524 | Bales | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020050112 | Koch et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020111629 | Phillips | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143344 | Taylor | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151898 | Sohngen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151978 | Zacouto et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020183750 | Buhler | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030053855 | Baur | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030144669 | Robinson | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030195515 | Sohngen | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040030395 | Blunn et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040138663 | Kosashvili et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040193266 | Meyer | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050012617 | DiSilvestro et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050055025 | Zacouto et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065529 | Liu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050107787 | Kutsenko | May 2005 | A1 |
20050234448 | McCarthy | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246034 | Soubeiran | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251109 | Soubeiran | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261779 | Meyer | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004459 | Hazebrouck et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009767 | Kiester | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060036259 | Carl et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036323 | Carl et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036324 | Sachs et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047282 | Gordon | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060052782 | Morgan et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058792 | Hynes | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069447 | DiSilvestro et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074448 | Harrison et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079897 | Harrison et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085043 | Stevenson | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060271107 | Harrison et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070015622 | Stauch | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016202 | Kraft et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070043376 | Leatherbury et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070173837 | Chan et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070233098 | Mastrorio et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239159 | Altarac et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239161 | Giger et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244488 | Metzger et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270803 | Giger et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276378 | Harrison et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080048855 | Berger | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065181 | Stevenson | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080108995 | Conway et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090030462 | Buttermann | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090062798 | Conway | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090112207 | Walker et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112263 | Pool et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090254088 | Soubeiran | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090275984 | Kim et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100049204 | Soubeiran | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100228167 | Ilovich et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228357 | Stauch | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2655093 | Dec 2007 | CA |
68515687.6 | Dec 1985 | DE |
10 2005 045 070 | Apr 2007 | DE |
1905388 | Apr 2008 | EP |
2901991 | Dec 2007 | FR |
WO 9951160 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 2006090380 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2007015239 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2007025191 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007118179 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2007144489 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008003952 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008040880 | Apr 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Gray's Anatomy, http://education.yahoo.com/reference/gray/subjects/subject/128, published Jul. 1, 2007. |
Prontes, Isabel, http://www.ehow.com/about—4795793—longest-bone-body.html, published Jun. 12, 2012. |
PCT International Search Report for PCT/US2010/047842, Applicant: Ellipse Technologies, Inc., Form PCT/ISA/210 and 220, dated Nov. 4, 2010 (4 pages). |
PCT Written Opinion of the International Search Authority for PCT/US2010/047842, Applicant: Ellipse Technologies, Inc., Form PCT/ISA/237, dated Nov. 4, 2010 (6 pages). |
Cole, J., Paley, D., Dahl, M., “Operative Technique. ISKD. Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor. Tibial Surgical Technique” IS-0508(A)-OPT-US © Orthofix Inc. Nov. 2005 (28 pages). |
Gebhardt, M., Neel, M., Soubeiran, A., Dubousset, J., “Early clinical experience with a custom made growing endoprosthesis in children with malignant bone tumors of the lower extremity actioned by an external permanent magnet: The Phenix M system”, International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage, Sep. 13, 2007, Hamburg, Germany. (2 pages). |
Guichet, J., Deromedis, B., Donnan, L., Peretti, G., Lascombes, P., Bado, F., “Gradual Femoral Lengthening with the Albizzia Intramedullary Nail”, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Edition, 2003, vol. 85, pp. 838-848 (12 pages). |
Grimer, R., Chotel, F., Abudu, S., Tillman, R., Carter, S., “Non-invasive extendable endoprosthesis for children—expensive but worth it!”, International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage, Sep. 13, 2007, Hamburg, Germany. (1 page). |
Gupta, A., Meswania, J., Pollock, R., Cannon, S., Briggs, T., Taylor, S., Blunn, G., “Non-Invasive distal Femoral Expandable Endoprosthesis for Limb-Salvage Surgery in Paediatric Tumours”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Edition, 2006, vol. 88-B, No. 5, pp. 649-654, Churchill Livingstone, London, England. (6 pages). |
Hankemeier, S., Gösling, T., Pape, H., Wiebking, U., Krettek, C., “Limb Lengthening with the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor (ISKD)”, Operative Orthopäpdie und Traumatologie, 2005, vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 79-101, Urban & Vogel, Munich, Germany. (23 pages). |
Shark, P., “The Machinery of Life”, Mechanical Engineering Magazine, Feb. 2004, Printed from Internet Site Oct. 24, 2007 http://www.memagazine.org/contents/current/features/moflife/moflife.html (10 pages). |
Soubeiran, A., Gebhart, M., Miladi, L., Griffet, J., Neel, M., Dubousset, J., “The Phenix M System. A Fully Implanted Lengthening Device Externally Controllable Through the Skin with a Palm Size Permanent Magnet; Applications to Pediatric Orthopaedics”, 6th European Research Conference in Pediatric Orthopaedics, Oct. 6, 2006, Toulouse, France. (7 pages). |
Soubeiran, A., Gebhart, M., Miladi, L., Griffet, J., Neel, M., Dubousset, J., “The Phenix M System, a fully implanted non-invasive lengthening device externally controllable through the skin with a palm size permanent magnet. Applications in Limb salvage.” International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage, Sep. 13, 2007, Hamburg, Germany. (2 pages). |
Verkerke, G., Koops, H., Veth, R., Oldhoff, J., Nielsen, H., vanden Kroonenberg, H., Grootenboer, H., van Krieken, F., “Design of a Lengthening Element for a Modular Femur Endoprosthetic System”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 1989, vol. 203, No. 2, pp. 97-102, Mechanical Engineering Publications, London, England. (6 pages). |
Verkerke, G., Koops, H., Veth, R., van den Kroonenberg, H., Grootenboer, H., Nielsen, H., Oldhoff, J., Postma, A., “An Extendable Modular Endoprosthetic System for Bone Tumour Management in the Leg”, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 1990, vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 91-96, Butterfield Scientific Limited, Guilford, England. (6 pages). |
Verkerke, G., Koops, H., Veth, R., Grootenboer, H., De Boer, L., Oldhoff, J., Postma, A. “Development and Test of an Extendable Endoprosthesis for Bone Reconstruction in the Leg”, The International Journal of Artificial Organs, 1994, vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 155-162, Wichtig Editore, Milan, Italy. (8 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110060336 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61363986 | Jul 2010 | US | |
61240071 | Sep 2009 | US |